I have noticed that people in the comments are blaming me for putting out this lecture as if I have come up with these arguments. I just wanted to clear out the air here. Iss lecture me aur harr lecture me jo kisi philosopher se related hota hai, jo bhi cheeze mein usme btata hu vo uss philosopher ki kahi hui baate hoti hai naki meri. I am just a vessel to articulate what these philosophers preached, so do not take these lectures otherwise, haa meri storytelling ki methodology kaafi expressive hai toh cheeze exaggerated lagti hai but inn lectures ko unn philosophers ki parchaai k tarah lo. Thanks & Regards
There's no such comment. Lol. Just that you were unable to sense the sarcastic tone of the comment and took it seriously. Anyway nice video bro. Keep up the good work.
@@No_Name.1797 have you even studied about them ? Did they kill people because they believed in atheistic philosophy, i challange you to give me a proposition of atheistic philosophy which suggests you to commit genocide, i think it's the other way around.
@@cogito9350 unki sari country hi ww2 ke badh economy ko badane mae hi lagi tho issue kyu hoga sara khel diversity ka hai sab ek hi jese hai tho mostly agree karte hai ek culture ko leke even ab itna hai ki muslim ya hindu hoke bhi vo culture values nhi chodege
The biggest problem of that argument was the assumption that morality comes from religion, while it actually came from human societies And aaj ke time pe, ask a murderer ki Tum kanoon se jyada darte ho ya bhagwaan se, and see his response
Most of the time people know what is moral and what is immoral. when they don't fear the consequences of their actions then then they may choose immoral action.
@@No_Name.1797 While that appears to make sense, but there isn't any established link b/w crime and atheism. *In my opinion* telling "hey bhagwaan saza dega crime karne me" can be used only to control children
@@No_Name.1797 I had said in my comment that morality wasn't developed from religion, but from human society and in today's time it is possible to teach a child to not commit crimes without the help of religion
As an atheist my goals are as follows 1. Seeking for the truth. 2.giving scientific reason for something that happened and putting faith on God. 3.by scientific evidence and research we can find the cure for any problem. And you pointed that atheist does not morals and ethics. You can find the data of criminals who are atheist and also criminals who are religious and cross check them. Think of any bad things as an atheist I can do society and things you can do as religious person on the name of religion . And also the main thing I choose to be a atheist that my claims are way more logical then religious claims. And I got biggest problem with now a days religious people is that they just bring justifications like my religion is older than any religion so my religion is superior. And they brings some mythological stories and tell this region right here this is written in my religious texts so the stories are real and tell me that this non-logical stories are truth Indian history. I'm an Atheist and also a Indian. I too have proud towards my country. And also I am so shameful for for religious rituals and practices. I live in Hyderabad it also know as silicon valley of India. Here near my surroundings a case took place a couple murdered they own 2 fully grown daughters and they claiming that god came and asked them for they daughter and they said they daughters didn't died yet they just went to meet got Shiva particularly shiva and they come back in 24 hours literally bro they head got separated from they body. Now explain me how they're more moral then me you told religious have more morality. I'm now questioning religious people's ethics work Whom do you choose one side is your family not only family some another human and other side is just a rock. This is not only one incident and explain me how following things are scientific or logical make a video on it this are following things 1. Sati dahan 2.sacrifices of animals including humans. 3.cast system. 4.witch hunting. If you are religious make a video on this topics. If you are pin my comment.
Your argument is right. There is nothing to debate. Being atheist doesn't make you immoral and being religious doesn't make anyone moral.. taking Indian example.. even ravan was religious but still a bas person morally. Moral depends not if you have faith or not but in your own self.. how you see the world. People who have faith shouldn't think that other who don't are bad.. if you have a sense of purpose and goals, it's fine if your atheist And what your talking about is not religion but a side effect of it called superstitions.. If there is blind faith, people will believe whatever is presented to them without thinking twice.. I myself am a religious person. But I consider and think about things and don't just believe them. Superstition is a effect of fear of unknown, the unknown called god. They try to condolence in something, that they believe can make them understand the unknown. They try to please the unknown, in such ways (no I'm not justifying them, they did wrong)
Bro take a chill pill man, he was giving a lecture on what DOSTOEVSKY argued... Go tell fydor your points. Copy paste this argument and go to some theology channel, seems out of place here.
Calling Hyderabad silicon valley of India shows your knowledge Bro And you are just telling the extreme examples, 970 million Hindus live in India, probably more, I don't see this type of incident everyday. Also you didn't mentioned that those parents were brainwashed by a baba, and most of these baba do it for money and not for the God or religion. I respect all the religion, cause each religion fulfills the spiritual need of the society, which is also as important as roti, kapada, makaan, cause everyone is not as philosophical as you are. Extreme was and will be always there, in avery religion, but you cannot ignore the good aspects and the balanced ones.
What kind of example is that? So Two crazy people mur dered their children and Hinduism is responsible for it? Killing your children is not dharma so what they did was definitely not according to Hinduism. The four topics that you mentioned - 1. Sati - husband dies, wife fills despair and sui cide. Sati was a regional practice in minute parts of India. The practice got ugly with time. But you can see from various historical accounts that many widows were discouraged by family members from sati. This became well known with missionary literature because they concocted this as a pan India evil practice to convert hindus of India. R. R. MohanRoy, a crypto Cristian helped missionaries peddle this lie as a brown sepoy. 2. Animal sacrifice - don't follow it so don't have any argument on this. You have to ask a shakta. 3. Caste system - Verna, a fluid system became a rigid after British consensus. British liked to categories things which helped them in controlling them. They didn't like a fluid system with variables so they forcefully put different jatis with different work expertise into rigid categories we see today. Brahmins had the most amount of restrictions according to scripture and shudras had the least. There were many shudra kings who employed brahmins as chief priests. 4. Witch burning - a Christian practice of Europe and came to India with them. Christians used to burn women scientists and polytheist during witch burning sessions.
Sir, I got myself interested in philosophy, though I'm not a deep thinker but still your lecture fascinates me to open my mind to various thoughts. Time just literally flies by whenever I watch your videos Excited for more upcoming ones!!!
Don't waste your life studying philosophy...we are not here to learn, we're here to enjoy...life is journey of 80 or 90 years so don't waste it...learn, earn, enjoy, travel, have lots of sex etc otherwise when you become old, you will regret.
@@AmarKumarr959no one will regret for knowing the truth for learning new things. You will die without knowing the amazing stuffs thousand thinkers from thousand years has put forward to understand the depth of life and overall meaning. What will you gain having sex and parties? Nothing but distracted from truth.
As soon as your existence ceases, the meaning that you has given to your life will no more alive. On the other hand, for a theist there is always an objective, inherent meaning of this life in the form of afterlife.
@@redblueblur6321 It is real for those who have taken that pill. And from a nihilistic perspective, it makes sense to take that pill because since objectively speaking, there is no purpose or meaning, deluding yourself into believing that there is one is a good idea if it makes your life better, since nothing matters anyways. Having said that, doing a philosophical suicide is not something I can do hence I will be nihilistic forever but if religious people are happy in their delusions, i'm happy for them.
@Motivativation-to-elevation. Being a theist for after life , support from God, and even meaning . This approach is for a coward person. Have some courage brother 💪 🙏. And I am not critizing you. I still respect your opinion on this . But think about it 💗
Being an atheist, life feels more logical and peaceful And remember that morality religion ya god se nahi aati Or society ke liye khatarnak vo log hain jinhe god ya religion chahiye apne moral values and limits set karne ke liye
After reading most comments, I found most people are clueless about what is social, religious and political. Supporters of atheism are criticising religion with those point which are political. Other side criticism of atheism with those points which come under social phenomenon.
Being an Atheist and someone who read four of his novels last year, I do not believe Dostoevsky was attacking atheism. Rather, he was attacking bad ideas in the context of Russia's significant move towards liberalism. He was in the Petrovsky Circle: a group of people with a common interest to reform Russian society. Dostoevsky was drawn to their ideas but after looking at the way they behaved and acted hypocritical, not mention his near death experience after being caught changed his life. Although he turned to Orthodox Christianity, his struggles with faith and reason are very much a huge part of his novels. The Brothers Karamazov has Ivan whose view on God's existence is ambiguous so he rather attacks God in the famous Grand Inquisitor. Note that he never says anything about the existence of God. He also later has a vision of the Devil before he goes mad. Demons (my favorite novel of his) is based on an actual murder that took place in his time and his point in the novel was how bad ideas can mislead people. Even in Crime and Punishment, Dostoevsky was criticising Utilitarianism more than Atheists because that is the philosophy Rashknolnikov uses to murder the women. I do not agree with the reading that Dostoevsky believed morality only lied in religion. He struggled with faith himself and lot of his characters who do commit crimes were Christians (like Razomakhin or the notorious Fyodor Karamazov). Both theists and non-theists were immoral in his works.
as a guy who survived some months of my life just on the hope that God is with me I believe living a life with God is a lot better than an atheistic mindset ( real wala gen z chutio wala nhi ) .i thank God everyday that wo samay maine survive krlia i was on the verge of hanging
Yes when you become atheist you put yourself above everything and you do things that feed your ego which is self destruction. Don't fear god have faith in him, love him and be curious to attain his consciousness.
I think people will still be moral even if we remove the concept of God because moral values are based on the social consensus and it is an evolutionary process. Problem occurs when religious people limits their morality to their religious texts. They don't understand that when any religious rule was given, there was some purpose at that time but now it is not required
For once let's remove the concept of God. Why would you not do an unethical practice in your life for some material gain if you're certain that you'll not get caught? Suppose you become a king of a place, you are incharge of making rules, wouldn't you make rules and laws which will benifit you and your family the most? People are inherently selfish, greedy, angry and lustful. If He gets a chance of authority he, most of the time tried to fulfill all his explicit desires. Religion keeps a person, a community or the whole population in check from macro to micro level, that if you'll do this or that which you know is immoral or unethical but you think you'll not be caught, you'll do it to fulfill your desire. but if you're religious it will stop you doing so because you have direction and higher purpose that your Lord is watching, you can decieve the whole world but how will I hide this from the one who is watching me All the time?
No, I won't do unethical acts because there are laws that are made by state which I elected. And we have abolished the monarch system so that no single person can make laws in his benifit only. And if you think the concept of God is required to stop you from being unethical then you intrinsically know that God is just a concept and chances of you being unethical are still there. Plus, there is problem of multiple religions, which is right which is wrong. Tell me if someone says I have to kill non religious people's because God says so, is it ethical? And there are many unethical practices associated with the religions(caste system, triple talaq etc). My argument was that ultimately all laws are made by humans only including religious laws to curb the unethical practices prevailing at that time Or at that place which you can not apply universally. For example consumption of alcohol is haram in islam but it is necessity in cold countries.
In the book "The Argumentative Indian" Dr. Amartya Sen took the reference from Gautam Buddha's quote "......making choice of good behviour is independent of God" there are so many panth that shows compassion andd empathy without relying on any God (eg: Buddhism, Jainism) secondly the counterargument of nihilism is atheism doesn't lead us into a hopeless state. I will prefer to take reference of Bhagat Singh. He was against suicide and full of motivation. In the book " Why I am an atheist" he motivated his brother Sukhdev when he dicided to commit suicide and third one is crime will increase as nobody is watching them but we can't deny the conscience and intuitions. If we do something wrong a sudden cognitive dissonance takes place. How can anyone escape this ? A morality and ethical behaviour is taught from our childhood which is definately independent of any religion and universal for all. Deontology is not the only way to solve problems with morality sometime we need to follow Utilitarian also. And if religion is the only way to acheive liberalism and peace in society then why killing the people having scientific thoughts like Galileo or Giordano Bruno ? or Why Tehrima Durrani wrote novel like "My feudal lord" or "Blashpemy" showing the crimes are commited for the sake of religion. Conclusion: Religion theism and atheism is independent of our morality, It depends on parenting, schooling and studying the great philosopher and perosonalities, rational thinking and courage to taking decision following the inner voice.
I just feel we can have another perspective to this with the aphorism that says, "There's a different in believing in God, and believing in the existence of God"
no warning sign or no words on hurting sentiments of atheists??? lol dharmik logo ka hota toh aabhi 10minit ka apology into banta.. but in a way i think its good.. no warning sign needed.. very good video indeed
Bhai isne kahi videos banayi hain jin mein atheist philosophers religion k against bolts hain lakin usne ak video atgeism k against bana li to ab ap k hosh hi ur gaye isse sori karne ki koi zarorat nahi almost is type KO sabhi videos mein he batata I k main ne ap KO bataya k nisi philosophers k is dunya k bare mein kia soch thi usse kaisi understanding thi aur ye bhi bata deta I k apni understanding aur ideas zabardasti kisi par impose na karo balke apni ideas share karo k tum kuch seekh sako apni knowledge improve kar lo to isse sorry karne ki koi zarorat nahi I aur na hi koi sane theist ya atheist expect kare qk zarorat hi nahi i❤
Hurting sentiments? Sir, you should be scouting my whole channel before dropping such a comment. Again the message was to articulate Dostoevsky on what he had to speak, not what I had to speak! There is an amassing difference between the both
@@DesiPhilosopher748 no no I'm just stating the difference between two different type of viewers group.. now one group can literally harm/death threat anyone on slight criticism n the other group will debate or show frustration/disagreement in usually non violent way.. I hope you understand what I'm saying sir.. nothing against you. N yes I do follow ur work
Dhai aakhar prem ke. Dada most religious people gave us genocide and corruption. On the other hand most athiest gave us advocacy of humanity, spoke peace and were kinder than the most. Statistically speaking. Religion ne shanti se zyada yudha diye hain duniya ko.
see bro, im an atheist but I'd say insaan ko bura kaam karna hai toh wo kaise bhi karega. with or without god. take the example of bhagat Singh he was a hard-core atheist but he wanted the welfare of human kind, he believed in uplifting the workers, humanitarianism. you don't need god to tell u what's wrong or right . we all have a conscience. it just comes down to what sort of person u are
First answer. A people who is athiest have lot of changes that they are critical thinker and can think about what is really Good or bad . And then we have laws, constitution and . The people who are believers they also can be dangerous for society ex. Hetler
Atheism n critical thinking doesn't go hand n hand. An atheist is in infinite abyss of moral theories, constitutions doesn't make sense here , it's contrary to atheism.
Let's say atheism is bad but it is pointing towards truth in that case just because it's destroying our civilization should we be abandoning it ? Isn't that injustice to the philosophical process of uncovering truth ? What should be honoured more according to a philosopher, love towards truth of wellbeing of the civilization ?
Please aap painting ya dusre art works ko Philosopher ke najarse philosophy se kaise ddkhta hai ya samjta hai uske upar Lecture lijiyena ...Please I am Request you ... muje us topic ke upar philosophy ko jane ki bohat jyada Curiosity hai ... mene youtube mene es topic pe kabhi bar Search Kiya par kahi bhi eske upar video nahi mil raha .... Please 🙏 aap eske upar banayena video
Atheism can induce existential angst and depression .But believing in someone or something can be taxing especially when logic and facts go against that belief . also atheism doesn't directly mean unkindness and apathy one can have values and moral for simply having a conscience and being an empath which is directly related to brain and its working (psychology) not just from forced fear imposed by a religion . fyodor is a beautiful philosopher but he was from 1800s where church god and religion (bible) were only things guiding man unlike today where humaity can have ted talks lectures sermons and interviews with a click
1:21 morality in human behavior. mortality samaj se banti hai dharmic to Ethiopia aur Pakistan bhi hai. Morality insan ke andar hoti hai ye experiment se sabit bhi ho gya hai
I think any thing no completely wrong or right, we should evey this in balance, so many problems and confusion end . Always it not about atheist or non atheist.we can follow the path of agnostic. ⁉️ Please share your thoughts or opinions
Sir ek concept he mene likha he " If you forcefully apply your thoughts to others, it's means your thoughts are already dead "-by me, By me? I think kyoki mene ye kahi padha nai tha or muje suza to mene likh diya, mere nam ke sath😅
Maybe you're not 100 percent right but till a limit Your idea makes some sense if you forcefully impose your idea on someone or force someone to do something that he hass no interest into it he will simply start hating that idea or work many victims don't even think for a while whether this idea or work is good or bad
2nd answer . Good think is not to get or find sometimes it's just acceptance. Accept we are humen being and just like other animals we don't need a meaning and we can make our worth of life
Humanity is replacing religion by large number, and there will not be any chaos and injustice if people become atheist BECAUSE we have another option for religion and that is humanity. Today or in history, most war happened because of religion and this thing wouldn't have been created we might got a better world. I think Dostoevsky was either biased or he didn't know about the better option of humanity. This is my opinion but I'm ready to accept something if you convince me. What are your thoughts?
Aaisa kuch nhi h atheist sirf or sirf god ko nhi manate h ....faltu ka hope nhi rakhte kisi kaam ko khud karne ki koshish karte o god pr trust nhi krte but pyar daya sachhai science logic es sb pr trust krte hai....
Religious people are so called Religious, they don't have any individual identity or any individual mind, mass (vid) jaha jaata h wo sab piche piche bhagte h. They listin story from text, imagine and believe. They are very fearfull and anxious. Yadi kal ye pata chale Religious logo ko ki, jhut bol ne se swarg ( heven ) jaaoge, to ye kal se jhut bolnaa chalu kardenge. Inko ye pata chale ki bhagwan ko paane k liye mandir nehi, club Jaana padta h to ye kal se club pe daru pite hue milinge. Inka bhagwan k sath len den ka rista h. Ye sab v bhagwan ko nehi maante yadi in sabko koi kahani nehi sunaya hota to ye sab reality k hisab se chalte. Insabke aandar kisina kisi prakar dar h. Ye sab dar se Bach ne keliye bhagwan ko maante h. Yadi Bhagwan inka baat sunta h to ye bolte h bhagwan h, nehi to nehi h. Inko v kahi na kahi bhagwan k uper bharosha nehi h. Sirf kitabi bate tote ( parrot 🦜) ki tarha rate h. Mai aapne ko atheist Maan ta hu, or mujhe reality Manjur h.... jo Jessa dikhta h mai wesa boltaa hu. Naa ki tumhari Tarha andar se kuch or Bahar se kuch dikhata hu. Yadi bhaiya kuch read karne jaisa lage to pin kardena.. Thank you ❤
baat to sahi hai lekin ye dar ke religion follow karna ya benefit ke lie religion follow karna har kisi ka reason nahi hosakta . Inner peace ke lie agar koi spirituality mein maney to woh apke argument ke against hai . Agar koi moral ground religion ke upar rakhta hai toh glt kya hai ismey end result mein woh accha insaan hi hai.
@@pranavsharma904 bro spirituality and religion ye dono alag h. Aap spiritual ho to aap religious nehi ho sakta h. Aap to sprit ya ( atama ) ki baat kar rahe h, to atma ko at the end chahiye mukti, to yadi ek spiritual person aapne ko religion se joodegaa to wo free keise Hoga, or wo end tak keise jaayega yaniki mukti ki wor. Aap spiritual ho jaaoge to Aap religion se uper uth jaaoge.mai hindu hu but mai avi kuran padh raha hu, to meri mummy mujhse pura chidti h, wo kahina kahi religious h. Wo subha ( morning ) Sam ( evening ) puja karti h per wo religious h, naa ki spiritual.
bhai aap please indian philosophy par bhi baat karo... jitne videos dekhe hai usse keh sakta hu ki aap acche se cover karenge without any bias... the 8 schools of thought would be good... iski series bhi chalegi aaram se banaiye
Honestly I don't think that the source of morality is only religion and god. The person who wants to beleive in god and thinks that god gives purpose to his life then this thought is not wrong for him at all. But faith in god can also make people blind. For mere faith people kill each other to protect their religion or god. At this time human starts thinking that he can protect god. Suicide bombers are people of faith they think they'll see heaven and think they'll meet god because of some hope. Is it moral???Morality depends upon how human can interpret situation. You will see many theists without sence of morality and similarly you may also see moral atheists who respects each others beleifs. Moral are those who are kind.
It's very complex to define the existance of term god itself thus it shows subjective nature if we look in objective perspective. it doesn't mean that god it is completely false we are hearing about nde's past life regression and lot of subjectiv experiences where athiests need to find thier arguments, I just want to say guys we humans are all here we need to be tolerant to each other then only progress ther's no way we can live happily if we are constanly promoting our ego of any sought
morality is followed Because of a common belief...and wo belief ye hai ki agar hum murder karenge toh god humein punish karega....app democracy mein believe krte tabhi democracy hai...lekin app gravitational force mein believe kro ya na kro ye stil exist krega ..i have read somewhere a king said ki mere kingdom ke logon ko mt btana ki god jesa concept nhi hai.. otherwise they will kill me overnight...
Personally I thing atheism with certain basic rules is best, like you can obey 8 principles of buddhism or 8 out of 10 principle principles of sikhism. And even if you're theist then you can obey all 10 principles, this is enough to live you're life.
Brother your message us meaningless for most of the people because they don't what are the rules of Buddhism or sikkism and you haven't told us Can you please tell us what are the rules that you want us to follow?
Brother, Buddha's eightfold path consists of right understanding, right purpose, right speech, right conduct, right livelihood, right effort, right kind of awareness, and right concentration and in skikshim Main teachings are there is one God and remember that god ( this point only for thiest), Equal rights for women and mankind, Work hard and do honest work, donate 10% of your income for the betterment of society, Be fearless, protect the right of others and stand for them, be gentle and act with humility.
@@ankitdixit9719 to bhai tumara ye q mana I k logo ko atheist hona chahiye ye sab jo apne bataya ye to religion ka almost 80 percent ya is se bhi zyada banta I to ap logon se ye q nahi kehte k theist raho ya atheist insaniat se pyar karo is dunya mein insaniat k liye apne potential k according kuch acha contributr karo aur blindly believe na kia karo inquirer bano critical thinking we kam lo with recpect apne Jo rules bataye hain he to hum se koi bhi taqaza nahi karte k humhe atheist hona chahiye main jagra nah I kar raha bus apna perspective samne rakh raha hon
Religious people have better mental health in comparison with atheists. I'm not saying that they're better than atheists, but when it comes to grappling with existential angst, sufferings, and tragedies, religious people tend to have an advantage in coping due to their belief in higher power's control. Even from an evolutionary standpoint, belief in higher power is better for your mental health...
I have spent so much time on this topic ( existence of God ), and get to know that if you ask theists to prove that God exist, they cannot... or yehi question agr atheist sy pucho ky prove kro ky God doesn't exist tou wo bhi nahe kr skty. Is hisab sy dekha jaye tou agnosticism is a sensible choice but agnostic banna kind of dumb sa lgtaa 😅 that you are running from the debate... So rn i'm confused 😂 don't know what to become... Lekin aik baat hai ky religion ko sirf us religion ky scriptures sy judge krna chahiye naa ky logon ko dekh kr... Or agr existence of God plus miracles wli baat ko maan lo ( without getting proves 😅 ) .... Being a religious person is not a bad deal, atheism never appealed to me, so i'm still doing research and trying to understand my religion.
Main manta hu ki khuda hai or jo nahi manta us se mera ye sawal hai ke ye duniya ye kainaat or insan kese ban gaye agar wo iska jawab dedeta hai toh main maan lunga ki khuda nahi or wo kahega toh fir khuda ko kisne banaya toh usay kisi ne nahi banaya every created thing has a creater but God uncreated. wo hamesha se maujood hai aisa koi waqt he nahi tha ki jab wo na ho jab kuch nahi tha toh khuda he tha agar ispe gehrayaai se sochnge ki ye chize kaha se aayi toh aqal khud yehi kahi gi ke koi toh hoga sabse pehle jisne ya jis se ye sara sil sila shuru hua nahi toh athiest bata de ke kaha se a gaye hum insan aur ye paid paudhe chane suraj Or ye kainaat Or khuda ko jhuthlane wale toh hamesha aag me jalenge janlenge Or jalte rahenge
Lack of belief in god = lack of purpose is an assumption. Purpose is not giving by god but religious institution who also teach castism, misogyny, superstitions etc Humans have developed not by following blindly but by questioning. God doesn't teach to be moral because human, animal sacrifices, oppression is also done to satisfy god. We atheists do oppose the concept of god but more than that, we oppose these things which harm humanity
kya nihilism hi कारण hai ki hm basic rights ko pane ke liye bhi govt. se struggle kr rhe hain like employment, climate etc. Basic responsibility as a citizen bhool gye hain, or iam just overcomplicating it ?
There are no atheist who attack other atheists saying their atheism is better than others. Thats not true in case of religious people. Israel vs palastine war is an example. There are many more examples in History.
तानाशाही पहले भी था जब भगवान को माना जा रहा था। जो मोरालिटी को डिसाइड कर रहा है इंसान लोग किसी भगवान की आवश्यकता नहीं है। हमें इसलिए मोरल होना हमें जरूरी है, क्योंकि हमें एक सुंदर समाज बनाना है। हमें सुंदर समाज इसलिए बनाना है, क्योंकि हम सुखी से रहे। अपने आप को स्वतंत्र महसूस करें, और यह सब बताने के लिए हमें कोई नहीं आने वाला। हमें हर विषय पर खुद ही सोच विचार करना चाहिए और बहस करना चाहिए और बातचीत करना चाहिए।
sir plz speak in simple hindi and use english words for complicated hindi words plz sir so that we Pakistani can understand it.. lots of love from pakistan
I will try to give an example of what happening here for normie people so that they don’t get to a conclusion just by listening to him. Eg: Bhojpuri superstar Khesari Lal criticised Stanley Kubrick because he didn’t understand anything.
You needed to analyze that none of this came true, and the reality is the least religious countries are the most moral and peaceful, and the most religious countries are most corrupt and immoral
The source of morality cannot be religion and God only and the morals even derived from God and religion are rigid which is the source of a lot of pain and suffering. Why does life need to have any meaning at all? It looks like we consider ourselves superior beings as we are just animals and try to find meaning in life through making up things like the concept of religion and so on. Looking at the state religion and God has brought to the world it feels the exact opposite of what is being described in this video has happened.
1. As a simple answer to atheistic freedom i will say that i won't kill or rape anyone because i don't want it to happen with me. It can sound selfish but yeah it is quite good answer, and even with religion morality is subjective (because you choose the religion whose morality feels best to you and feeling is a subjective thing, otherwise you like your born religion's morality so much that you follow it till you die) And the police comparison of a controlling power doesn't really equates with god as a controller because you see god is presumed as good and perfect in his morality, because of which even if there is some parts of religion which can be considered and morally evil with human understanding, theists deny the evil and say god would have perfect reasons to do that. In contrast with concept of police we know that they can be corrupt and they can do evil, that's why we can object to an evil act done by police, as they are not perfectly moral, but in case of god this is missing. Because of this i think morality should be out of the religion, if you think that these two cases are equivalent then god shouldn't be presumed as all good. 2. The thing about hope and purpose is a close call towards religion, but i would prefer to be in a meaningless world and to revolt against it, if i am not misrepresenting albert camus also talked about this that sisyphus has an impossible goal which he is never going to achieve, but still he revolts against that meaninglessness of his efforts, and if we see through the lenses of science the cosmos is more like the example.....cold, dark and meaningless, again i am not sure about my interpretation of camus so forgive me if i am wrong. The thing about alienation, i will quite disagree because even with god if you put a small amount of people of one religion into an area which has a big amount of people of other religion, it is quite prevalent that they will also face alienation. So why don't be an atheist ? And also lgbt people are not accepted over the world, does that mean they should stop being who they are, obviously this leads to suicide and depression but this is revolting against the absurd. 3. If i assume all ethical statements are emotional attitudes and you can't define good and bad objectively with a theory, then i have perfect reasons to be kind to other people because it is my emotion that is driving me to do that, even if this sound vauge than you can have something like if i don't do good to the world then humanity might suffer in future and my children and their children might also suffer, so i will try my best to do as much good as i can to the world to prevent suffering. (2nd argument might be a slippery slope but you can use science to actually investigate consequences of your ignorance towards the world) And the last point towards the economic and political instability sounds a bit slippery slope, and even faith is totally exploited against the human society, so yeah even in the absence of faith the demeaning factors of society will still persist but is can't be blamed on atheists. After all Thank you for bringing this type of content in india, i hope this will lead to a healthy philosophical debates about these topics which aren't talked about that much. Keep it up bro. ❤️🤝
It believed that we are just animals. So basic purpose should be Survive Reproduce Contribution .................and follow mashlo need hirary. So I thought that is meaning less finding what is meaning of life , purpose of life etc ... Self aculation will part of life that need a poper time and stage of life when you have understood
FD baba khd b believe krte the kya? In argument se tw lagta ha fd baba ye keh rahe han k God ha ya k nh mje nh pata lekin God ko manna q zaroori ha ye mai btata hun
By simply common sense I don't believe in God: Charlie Chaplin. If people are good only because they fear punishment and hope some reward.Then we are a sorry lot indeed: Albert Einstein
But what if someones god says murder this man or that man who is against or murder this man if he do this ??? In my opinion people govern themselves through more conscious thought sought of inner morality which comes from within although they really need god for some things but some people commit crime even if they are very keen follower of god and his values... The difference is when we commit any crime we have to be unconscious as if we don't know it's value or what we are doing just a like man who isn't functional and can't understand with his brain has disability it's difference between Englightent and those who are unlighted
God is like constitution of old time . Intellectuals use god to put morality in people but many find they way to do wrong and offer something to god to get clean here comes the constitution if you proved guilty no matter god forgive you or not you will get punish ❤🗿
"I wanted a bike but i can't afford it so I asked God to give it to me...., But that's not how God works so I stole a bike and asked him for forgiveness🙏🤲....... "
Fydor baba Agar god hai toh rokta kyu nahi criminal ko or yadi kuch kar nahi sakta toh, phir dar kiska, or yadi god hai nahi to phir discussion hi bekar hai.
You are judging fyodor too early brother his works are totally open and often people extract subjective meanings from it being a subjective is totally okay because nobody knows truth not even fyodor. Kafka, fyodor or whatever they are always open about something like 50-50 thing is it is depending upon a read how you gonna drink it cause you will never gonna know what was their original purpose to their works only they knew this. They are not particularly taking any side they want to say that” that’s how humans think” by contemplated their works. Title something like huge ambiguous work is total endorsement of subjectivity which will differ person to person
My dear❤ap sirf Indian🇮🇳👳 ko mukhatib karty hu .ap ki zuban jahan bhi koi samhaj raha hu unhin bhi adrees mn shamil kr lia kro. Love n respect all viewers from Karachi Pakistan
Not true. I oppose. By nature we have no purpose of this life... We are just trying to look for some almighty to get some support. That is a imaginary entity. We can be better of just bby being human beings. Even after being so religious we are facing utmost severity and injustice and grave wars and human sufferings. The picture is neither good on the religious side. I can understand your apprehensions but you have exaggerated this. It won't happen as you have said. Keep you eyes open to see the change. Thank you
Bhai vo kyuu exaggerate krenge, jo uss philosopher ki philosophy hai vo poori tarah se bata di. Philosopher pe ungli uthaao na, uss bande pe kyuu utha rahe ho jo bss uski baat samjha raha hai 🥲
Hmm... Yeah my doubt is with the philosopher only. The philosopher seems to be saying these prophecies long back so we need to amend them as per today's age. His understanding is what he is... But there may be realms he won't know... Right? @@beast5912
I have noticed that people in the comments are blaming me for putting out this lecture as if I have come up with these arguments. I just wanted to clear out the air here.
Iss lecture me aur harr lecture me jo kisi philosopher se related hota hai, jo bhi cheeze mein usme btata hu vo uss philosopher ki kahi hui baate hoti hai naki meri.
I am just a vessel to articulate what these philosophers preached, so do not take these lectures otherwise, haa meri storytelling ki methodology kaafi expressive hai toh cheeze exaggerated lagti hai but inn lectures ko unn philosophers ki parchaai k tarah lo.
Thanks & Regards
There's no such comment. Lol. Just that you were unable to sense the sarcastic tone of the comment and took it seriously.
Anyway nice video bro. Keep up the good work.
But what is your philosophy? Do u believe in God or are u an atheist/agnostic???
See it practically, Country like swedon and Japan have nearly 70‰ atheist,but they are moral and peaceful also.....
Add a little bit of economic issue with little bit of identity diversity and 💥 boom dhamaka
Mao tse,Stalin,lelin,Hideshi are moral and peaceful also.....
Japan was a Buddhist country tho
@@No_Name.1797 have you even studied about them ? Did they kill people because they believed in atheistic philosophy, i challange you to give me a proposition of atheistic philosophy which suggests you to commit genocide, i think it's the other way around.
@@cogito9350 unki sari country hi ww2 ke badh economy ko badane mae hi lagi tho issue kyu hoga sara khel diversity ka hai sab ek hi jese hai tho mostly agree karte hai ek culture ko leke even ab itna hai ki muslim ya hindu hoke bhi vo culture values nhi chodege
The biggest problem of that argument was the assumption that morality comes from religion, while it actually came from human societies
And aaj ke time pe, ask a murderer ki Tum kanoon se jyada darte ho ya bhagwaan se, and see his response
Most of the time people know what is moral and what is immoral. when they don't fear the consequences of their actions then then they may choose immoral action.
Agar koi murderer kanun se bach gaye toh use kon saza dega ? tera ma ya tera baap
@@No_Name.1797 While that appears to make sense, but there isn't any established link b/w crime and atheism. *In my opinion* telling "hey bhagwaan saza dega crime karne me" can be used only to control children
@@thimbaiah9005 So u are saying adults should do whatever they want to ? then there is no need of making laws on the basis of murder
@@No_Name.1797 I had said in my comment that morality wasn't developed from religion, but from human society
and in today's time it is possible to teach a child to not commit crimes without the help of religion
As an atheist my goals are as follows
1. Seeking for the truth.
2.giving scientific reason for something that happened and putting faith on God.
3.by scientific evidence and research we can find the cure for any problem.
And you pointed that atheist does not morals and ethics.
You can find the data of criminals who are atheist and also criminals who are religious and cross check them.
Think of any bad things as an atheist I can do society and things you can do as religious person on the name of religion .
And also the main thing I choose to be a atheist that my claims are way more logical then religious claims.
And I got biggest problem with now a days religious people is that they just bring justifications like my religion is older than any religion so my religion is superior.
And they brings some mythological stories and tell this region right here this is written in my religious texts so the stories are real and tell me that this non-logical stories are truth Indian history.
I'm an Atheist and also a Indian. I too have proud towards my country.
And also I am so shameful for for religious rituals and practices.
I live in Hyderabad it also know as silicon valley of India.
Here near my surroundings a case took place a couple murdered they own 2 fully grown daughters and they claiming that god came and asked them for they daughter and they said they daughters didn't died yet they just went to meet got Shiva particularly shiva and they come back in 24 hours literally bro they head got separated from they body.
Now explain me how they're more moral then me you told religious have more morality.
I'm now questioning religious people's ethics work
Whom do you choose one side is your family not only family some another human and other side is just a rock.
This is not only one incident and explain me how following things are scientific or logical make a video on it this are following things
1. Sati dahan
2.sacrifices of animals including humans.
3.cast system.
4.witch hunting.
If you are religious make a video on this topics.
If you are pin my comment.
I am also Hyderabad 😊
Your argument is right. There is nothing to debate. Being atheist doesn't make you immoral and being religious doesn't make anyone moral.. taking Indian example.. even ravan was religious but still a bas person morally. Moral depends not if you have faith or not but in your own self.. how you see the world. People who have faith shouldn't think that other who don't are bad.. if you have a sense of purpose and goals, it's fine if your atheist
And what your talking about is not religion but a side effect of it called superstitions.. If there is blind faith, people will believe whatever is presented to them without thinking twice.. I myself am a religious person. But I consider and think about things and don't just believe them. Superstition is a effect of fear of unknown, the unknown called god. They try to condolence in something, that they believe can make them understand the unknown. They try to please the unknown, in such ways (no I'm not justifying them, they did wrong)
Bro take a chill pill man, he was giving a lecture on what DOSTOEVSKY argued... Go tell fydor your points. Copy paste this argument and go to some theology channel, seems out of place here.
Calling Hyderabad silicon valley of India shows your knowledge Bro
And you are just telling the extreme examples, 970 million Hindus live in India, probably more, I don't see this type of incident everyday. Also you didn't mentioned that those parents were brainwashed by a baba, and most of these baba do it for money and not for the God or religion. I respect all the religion, cause each religion fulfills the spiritual need of the society, which is also as important as roti, kapada, makaan, cause everyone is not as philosophical as you are. Extreme was and will be always there, in avery religion, but you cannot ignore the good aspects and the balanced ones.
What kind of example is that?
So Two crazy people mur dered their children and Hinduism is responsible for it? Killing your children is not dharma so what they did was definitely not according to Hinduism.
The four topics that you mentioned -
1. Sati - husband dies, wife fills despair and sui cide. Sati was a regional practice in minute parts of India. The practice got ugly with time. But you can see from various historical accounts that many widows were discouraged by family members from sati. This became well known with missionary literature because they concocted this as a pan India evil practice to convert hindus of India. R. R. MohanRoy, a crypto Cristian helped missionaries peddle this lie as a brown sepoy.
2. Animal sacrifice - don't follow it so don't have any argument on this. You have to ask a shakta.
3. Caste system - Verna, a fluid system became a rigid after British consensus. British liked to categories things which helped them in controlling them. They didn't like a fluid system with variables so they forcefully put different jatis with different work expertise into rigid categories we see today. Brahmins had the most amount of restrictions according to scripture and shudras had the least. There were many shudra kings who employed brahmins as chief priests.
4. Witch burning - a Christian practice of Europe and came to India with them. Christians used to burn women scientists and polytheist during witch burning sessions.
The topics u choose along with ur casual way of speaking makes u unique
Sir, I got myself interested in philosophy, though I'm not a deep thinker but still your lecture fascinates me to open my mind to various thoughts. Time just literally flies by whenever I watch your videos
Excited for more upcoming ones!!!
You should listen galib kamal
Don't waste your life studying philosophy...we are not here to learn, we're here to enjoy...life is journey of 80 or 90 years so don't waste it...learn, earn, enjoy, travel, have lots of sex etc otherwise when you become old, you will regret.
@@AmarKumarr959no one will regret for knowing the truth for learning new things. You will die without knowing the amazing stuffs thousand thinkers from thousand years has put forward to understand the depth of life and overall meaning. What will you gain having sex and parties? Nothing but distracted from truth.
@@AmarKumarr959what you said can be considered philosophy as well
@@user-dr4pw should I consider myself a philosopher?🫣
I am an atheist and I can say that my life is still and even more Beautiful and Meaningful .❤❤😊
As soon as your existence ceases, the meaning that you has given to your life will no more alive. On the other hand, for a theist there is always an objective, inherent meaning of this life in the form of afterlife.
@@Motivativation-to-elevation. Oho, so do you really believe thinking about afterlife makes it anymore real ?
@@redblueblur6321 It is real for those who have taken that pill. And from a nihilistic perspective, it makes sense to take that pill because since objectively speaking, there is no purpose or meaning, deluding yourself into believing that there is one is a good idea if it makes your life better, since nothing matters anyways. Having said that, doing a philosophical suicide is not something I can do hence I will be nihilistic forever but if religious people are happy in their delusions, i'm happy for them.
U still believe in something
@Motivativation-to-elevation. Being a theist for after life , support from God, and even meaning . This approach is for a coward person. Have some courage brother 💪 🙏. And I am not critizing you. I still respect your opinion on this . But think about it 💗
Being an atheist, life feels more logical and peaceful
And remember that morality religion ya god se nahi aati
Or society ke liye khatarnak vo log hain jinhe god ya religion chahiye apne moral values and limits set karne ke liye
After reading most comments, I found most people are clueless about what is social, religious and political.
Supporters of atheism are criticising religion with those point which are political.
Other side criticism of atheism with those points which come under social phenomenon.
The best video of my life, needed so much
Being an Atheist and someone who read four of his novels last year, I do not believe Dostoevsky was attacking atheism. Rather, he was attacking bad ideas in the context of Russia's significant move towards liberalism. He was in the Petrovsky Circle: a group of people with a common interest to reform Russian society. Dostoevsky was drawn to their ideas but after looking at the way they behaved and acted hypocritical, not mention his near death experience after being caught changed his life. Although he turned to Orthodox Christianity, his struggles with faith and reason are very much a huge part of his novels.
The Brothers Karamazov has Ivan whose view on God's existence is ambiguous so he rather attacks God in the famous Grand Inquisitor. Note that he never says anything about the existence of God. He also later has a vision of the Devil before he goes mad. Demons (my favorite novel of his) is based on an actual murder that took place in his time and his point in the novel was how bad ideas can mislead people.
Even in Crime and Punishment, Dostoevsky was criticising Utilitarianism more than Atheists because that is the philosophy Rashknolnikov uses to murder the women.
I do not agree with the reading that Dostoevsky believed morality only lied in religion. He struggled with faith himself and lot of his characters who do commit crimes were Christians (like Razomakhin or the notorious Fyodor Karamazov). Both theists and non-theists were immoral in his works.
You got some brain
as a guy who survived some months of my life just on the hope that God is with me I believe living a life with God is a lot better than an atheistic mindset ( real wala gen z chutio wala nhi ) .i thank God everyday that wo samay maine survive krlia i was on the verge of hanging
I'm agnostic atheist but I agree, logically it's better to have faith in god
yes @@rekhakhanna5008
Lol Indian gen z are mostly religious...so chutiya tum jese huye..😂😂
Yes when you become atheist you put yourself above everything and you do things that feed your ego which is self destruction. Don't fear god have faith in him, love him and be curious to attain his consciousness.
I think people will still be moral even if we remove the concept of God because moral values are based on the social consensus and it is an evolutionary process. Problem occurs when religious people limits their morality to their religious texts. They don't understand that when any religious rule was given, there was some purpose at that time but now it is not required
For once let's remove the concept of God. Why would you not do an unethical practice in your life for some material gain if you're certain that you'll not get caught? Suppose you become a king of a place, you are incharge of making rules, wouldn't you make rules and laws which will benifit you and your family the most? People are inherently selfish, greedy, angry and lustful. If He gets a chance of authority he, most of the time tried to fulfill all his explicit desires. Religion keeps a person, a community or the whole population in check from macro to micro level, that if you'll do this or that which you know is immoral or unethical but you think you'll not be caught, you'll do it to fulfill your desire. but if you're religious it will stop you doing so because you have direction and higher purpose that your Lord is watching, you can decieve the whole world but how will I hide this from the one who is watching me All the time?
No, I won't do unethical acts because there are laws that are made by state which I elected. And we have abolished the monarch system so that no single person can make laws in his benifit only.
And if you think the concept of God is required to stop you from being unethical then you intrinsically know that God is just a concept and chances of you being unethical are still there.
Plus, there is problem of multiple religions, which is right which is wrong. Tell me if someone says I have to kill non religious people's because God says so, is it ethical?
And there are many unethical practices associated with the religions(caste system, triple talaq etc).
My argument was that ultimately all laws are made by humans only including religious laws to curb the unethical practices prevailing at that time Or at that place which you can not apply universally. For example consumption of alcohol is haram in islam but it is necessity in cold countries.
In the book "The Argumentative Indian" Dr. Amartya Sen took the reference from Gautam Buddha's quote "......making choice of good behviour is independent of God" there are so many panth that shows compassion andd empathy without relying on any God (eg: Buddhism, Jainism) secondly the counterargument of nihilism is atheism doesn't lead us into a hopeless state. I will prefer to take reference of Bhagat Singh. He was against suicide and full of motivation. In the book " Why I am an atheist" he motivated his brother Sukhdev when he dicided to commit suicide and third one is crime will increase as nobody is watching them but we can't deny the conscience and intuitions. If we do something wrong a sudden cognitive dissonance takes place. How can anyone escape this ? A morality and ethical behaviour is taught from our childhood which is definately independent of any religion and universal for all. Deontology is not the only way to solve problems with morality sometime we need to follow Utilitarian also. And if religion is the only way to acheive liberalism and peace in society then why killing the people having scientific thoughts like Galileo or Giordano Bruno ? or Why Tehrima Durrani wrote novel like "My feudal lord" or "Blashpemy" showing the crimes are commited for the sake of religion.
Conclusion: Religion theism and atheism is independent of our morality, It depends on parenting, schooling and studying the great philosopher and perosonalities, rational thinking and courage to taking decision following the inner voice.
I just feel we can have another perspective to this with the aphorism that says, "There's a different in believing in God, and believing in the existence of God"
Thanks bro i just want to say exactly same things 💯 😅
no warning sign or no words on hurting sentiments of atheists??? lol dharmik logo ka hota toh aabhi 10minit ka apology into banta.. but in a way i think its good.. no warning sign needed.. very good video indeed
Bhai isne kahi videos banayi hain jin mein atheist philosophers religion k against bolts hain lakin usne ak video atgeism k against bana li to ab ap k hosh hi ur gaye isse sori karne ki koi zarorat nahi almost is type KO sabhi videos mein he batata I k main ne ap KO bataya k nisi philosophers k is dunya k bare mein kia soch thi usse kaisi understanding thi aur ye bhi bata deta I k apni understanding aur ideas zabardasti kisi par impose na karo balke apni ideas share karo k tum kuch seekh sako apni knowledge improve kar lo to isse sorry karne ki koi zarorat nahi I aur na hi koi sane theist ya atheist expect kare qk zarorat hi nahi i❤
agreed we don't get offended for silly things 😂
@@Sami02 true
Hurting sentiments? Sir, you should be scouting my whole channel before dropping such a comment. Again the message was to articulate Dostoevsky on what he had to speak, not what I had to speak! There is an amassing difference between the both
@@DesiPhilosopher748 no no I'm just stating the difference between two different type of viewers group.. now one group can literally harm/death threat anyone on slight criticism n the other group will debate or show frustration/disagreement in usually non violent way.. I hope you understand what I'm saying sir.. nothing against you. N yes I do follow ur work
Dhai aakhar prem ke. Dada most religious people gave us genocide and corruption. On the other hand most athiest gave us advocacy of humanity, spoke peace and were kinder than the most. Statistically speaking. Religion ne shanti se zyada yudha diye hain duniya ko.
I think human consciousness is a tragic misstep in human evolution
~~Rustin Cohle
see bro, im an atheist but I'd say insaan ko bura kaam karna hai toh wo kaise bhi karega. with or without god. take the example of bhagat Singh he was a hard-core atheist but he wanted the welfare of human kind, he believed in uplifting the workers, humanitarianism. you don't need god to tell u what's wrong or right . we all have a conscience. it just comes down to what sort of person u are
भाई आपका तरीका समझाने का गजब का है। धन्यवाद❤
First answer. A people who is athiest have lot of changes that they are critical thinker and can think about what is really Good or bad . And then we have laws, constitution and . The people who are believers they also can be dangerous for society ex. Hetler
Atheism n critical thinking doesn't go hand n hand. An atheist is in infinite abyss of moral theories, constitutions doesn't make sense here , it's contrary to atheism.
7:10 realization that now you can't blame anyone other than yourself for your actions and outcomes
I have seen many people who warships god day and night but their deed (karm) were awfull..... So this proves god can give us hope not morlity.
Let's say atheism is bad but it is pointing towards truth in that case just because it's destroying our civilization should we be abandoning it ? Isn't that injustice to the philosophical process of uncovering truth ? What should be honoured more according to a philosopher, love towards truth of wellbeing of the civilization ?
Please aap painting ya dusre art works ko Philosopher ke najarse philosophy se kaise ddkhta hai ya samjta hai uske upar Lecture lijiyena ...Please I am Request you ... muje us topic ke upar philosophy ko jane ki bohat jyada Curiosity hai ... mene youtube mene es topic pe kabhi bar Search Kiya par kahi bhi eske upar video nahi mil raha .... Please 🙏 aap eske upar banayena video
Atheism can induce existential angst and depression .But believing in someone or something
can be taxing especially when logic and facts go against that belief . also atheism doesn't directly mean unkindness and apathy one can have values and moral for simply having a conscience and being an empath which is directly related to brain and its working (psychology) not just from forced fear imposed by a religion . fyodor is a beautiful philosopher but he was from 1800s where church god and religion (bible) were only things guiding man unlike today where humaity can have ted talks lectures sermons and interviews with a click
This lecture goes to show that you don't need to agree with every philosopher you come across.
1:21 morality in human behavior.
mortality samaj se banti hai dharmic to Ethiopia aur Pakistan bhi hai. Morality insan ke andar hoti hai ye experiment se sabit bhi ho gya hai
I think any thing no completely wrong or right, we should evey this in balance, so many problems and confusion end .
Always it not about atheist or non atheist.we can follow the path of agnostic.
⁉️ Please share your thoughts or opinions
Hey a serious qs to u buddy…. After sophie’s world what to go for?? Ur suggestion pls.
100% agree with FD baba, even I suffer from these thing in a past because of Atheistism
Bhai bhot mst lyf ho jati hai atheist hoke
The best channel seen so far that is same level of international philosophy channel in terms of quality content
Sir ek concept he mene likha he
" If you forcefully apply your thoughts to others, it's means your thoughts are already dead "-by me,
By me? I think kyoki mene ye kahi padha nai tha or muje suza to mene likh diya, mere nam ke sath😅
Maybe you're not 100 percent right but till a limit
Your idea makes some sense if you forcefully impose your idea on someone or force someone to do something that he hass no interest into it he will simply start hating that idea or work many victims don't even think for a while whether this idea or work is good or bad
@@muhammadwazeer6446 thank you sir for your consult I really appreciate your thoughts, have a great day sir.
Nope what if it's propaganda and it's good.
@@patelpragnesh4512 you're welcome 🤗❤
Stupid purely asinine, just some word play
Most effective video may be it help peoples to change thier thought ❤
2nd answer . Good think is not to get or find sometimes it's just acceptance. Accept we are humen being and just like other animals we don't need a meaning and we can make our worth of life
Hamari zindagi ka purpose god kese ho sakta hai jab k hamare liye itne saare other topics bhi hai vo hone chahiye ya god
Brother,
Please commence the TG community.
Humanity is replacing religion by large number, and there will not be any chaos and injustice if people become atheist BECAUSE we have another option for religion and that is humanity. Today or in history, most war happened because of religion and this thing wouldn't have been created we might got a better world. I think Dostoevsky was either biased or he didn't know about the better option of humanity.
This is my opinion but I'm ready to accept something if you convince me. What are your thoughts?
Aaisa kuch nhi h
atheist sirf or sirf god ko nhi manate h ....faltu ka hope nhi rakhte kisi kaam ko khud karne ki koshish karte o god pr trust nhi krte but pyar daya sachhai science logic es sb pr trust krte hai....
Religious people are so called Religious, they don't have any individual identity or any individual mind, mass (vid) jaha jaata h wo sab piche piche bhagte h. They listin story from text, imagine and believe. They are very fearfull and anxious. Yadi kal ye pata chale Religious logo ko ki, jhut bol ne se swarg ( heven ) jaaoge, to ye kal se jhut bolnaa chalu kardenge.
Inko ye pata chale ki bhagwan ko paane k liye mandir nehi, club Jaana padta h to ye kal se club pe daru pite hue milinge.
Inka bhagwan k sath len den ka rista h. Ye sab v bhagwan ko nehi maante yadi in sabko koi kahani nehi sunaya hota to ye sab reality k hisab se chalte.
Insabke aandar kisina kisi prakar dar h. Ye sab dar se Bach ne keliye bhagwan ko maante h.
Yadi Bhagwan inka baat sunta h to ye bolte h bhagwan h, nehi to nehi h. Inko v kahi na kahi bhagwan k uper bharosha nehi h. Sirf kitabi bate tote ( parrot 🦜) ki tarha rate h.
Mai aapne ko atheist Maan ta hu, or mujhe reality Manjur h.... jo Jessa dikhta h mai wesa boltaa hu. Naa ki tumhari Tarha andar se kuch or Bahar se kuch dikhata hu.
Yadi bhaiya kuch read karne jaisa lage to pin kardena..
Thank you ❤
Agreed
baat to sahi hai lekin ye dar ke religion follow karna ya benefit ke lie religion follow karna har kisi ka reason nahi hosakta . Inner peace ke lie agar koi spirituality mein maney to woh apke argument ke against hai .
Agar koi moral ground religion ke upar rakhta hai toh glt kya hai ismey end result mein woh accha insaan hi hai.
@@pranavsharma904 bro spirituality and religion ye dono alag h. Aap spiritual ho to aap religious nehi ho sakta h. Aap to sprit ya ( atama ) ki baat kar rahe h, to atma ko at the end chahiye mukti, to yadi ek spiritual person aapne ko religion se joodegaa to wo free keise Hoga, or wo end tak keise jaayega yaniki mukti ki wor. Aap spiritual ho jaaoge to Aap religion se uper uth jaaoge.mai hindu hu but mai avi kuran padh raha hu, to meri mummy mujhse pura chidti h, wo kahina kahi religious h. Wo subha ( morning ) Sam ( evening ) puja karti h per wo religious h, naa ki spiritual.
@@jagmohanswain ye sab bekar kibaate h, jo bhagwan ram ko manta h like kare.
Argument ❌
Reality check ✔️
Nice work brother ❤
bhai aap please indian philosophy par bhi baat karo... jitne videos dekhe hai usse keh sakta hu ki aap acche se cover karenge without any bias... the 8 schools of thought would be good... iski series bhi chalegi aaram se banaiye
Which writer did you mention in 9:50 after Camus?
I guess sartre
Jean-Paul Sartre
Koi fayda nhi youtube delete kar dega meri comment
Bhej to sahi
What are your thoughts on osho??
Bhai people want evidence to believe something when it comes to God why they don't want evidence of God
Because God is not human being he is beyond this physical realm, he is infinite and we're finite. God is consciousness.
From where consciousness had originated?
One question who is God?
If he made us then who made him
Every sentence was a claim. Can you prove any of it?@@hardevrajbanshi9705
Honestly I don't think that the source of morality is only religion and god. The person who wants to beleive in god and thinks that god gives purpose to his life then this thought is not wrong for him at all. But faith in god can also make people blind. For mere faith people kill each other to protect their religion or god. At this time human starts thinking that he can protect god. Suicide bombers are people of faith they think they'll see heaven and think they'll meet god because of some hope. Is it moral???Morality depends upon how human can interpret situation. You will see many theists without sence of morality and similarly you may also see moral atheists who respects each others beleifs. Moral are those who are kind.
you gained a new subscriber, thankyou for such a needed content.
Thiests are death to the humanity?
It's very complex to define the existance of term god itself thus it shows subjective nature if we look in objective perspective. it doesn't mean that god it is completely false we are hearing about nde's past life regression and lot of subjectiv experiences where athiests need to find thier arguments, I just want to say guys we humans are all here we need to be tolerant to each other then only progress ther's no way we can live happily if we are constanly promoting our ego of any sought
Brother, you are doing great work.
video suggestion: Existentialism
Nice interpretation
Atheism is common in Scandinavia and still there's order and prosperity.
If creation exist , Creater also exist. If a volcano blast there was a cause and effect but who desided this cause and effect?
Lol 😆 if god can exit without creation then why not universe can exist without god 😂
@@PRAKHAR-c1iuniverse is just an illusion
For contrast absence of god makes me fascinated to live .
Lack of Empathy* = Apathy
Sir, could you make a Video on Cormac McCarthy?..Just a request/suggestion.
morality is followed Because of a common belief...and wo belief ye hai ki agar hum murder karenge toh god humein punish karega....app democracy mein believe krte tabhi democracy hai...lekin app gravitational force mein believe kro ya na kro ye stil exist krega
..i have read somewhere a king said ki mere kingdom ke logon ko mt btana ki god jesa concept nhi hai.. otherwise they will kill me overnight...
Personally I thing atheism with certain basic rules is best, like you can obey 8 principles of buddhism or 8 out of 10 principle principles of sikhism. And even if you're theist then you can obey all 10 principles, this is enough to live you're life.
Brother your message us meaningless for most of the people because they don't what are the rules of Buddhism or sikkism and you haven't told us
Can you please tell us what are the rules that you want us to follow?
Brother, Buddha's eightfold path consists of right understanding, right purpose, right speech, right conduct, right livelihood, right effort, right kind of awareness, and right concentration and in skikshim Main teachings are there is one God and remember that god ( this point only for thiest), Equal rights for women and mankind, Work hard and do honest work, donate 10% of your income for the betterment of society, Be fearless, protect the right of others and stand for them, be gentle and act with humility.
@@ankitdixit9719 to bhai tumara ye q mana I k logo ko atheist hona chahiye ye sab jo apne bataya ye to religion ka almost 80 percent ya is se bhi zyada banta I to ap logon se ye q nahi kehte k theist raho ya atheist insaniat se pyar karo is dunya mein insaniat k liye apne potential k according kuch acha contributr karo aur blindly believe na kia karo inquirer bano critical thinking we kam lo with recpect apne Jo rules bataye hain he to hum se koi bhi taqaza nahi karte k humhe atheist hona chahiye main jagra nah I kar raha bus apna perspective samne rakh raha hon
Buddhism is atheist philosophy
You can be rational and have a moral code of your own without even following Buddisism or Sikhism.
Religious people have better mental health in comparison with atheists. I'm not saying that they're better than atheists, but when it comes to grappling with existential angst, sufferings, and tragedies, religious people tend to have an advantage in coping due to their belief in higher power's control. Even from an evolutionary standpoint, belief in higher power is better for your mental health...
I have spent so much time on this topic ( existence of God ), and get to know that if you ask theists to prove that God exist, they cannot... or yehi question agr atheist sy pucho ky prove kro ky God doesn't exist tou wo bhi nahe kr skty. Is hisab sy dekha jaye tou agnosticism is a sensible choice but agnostic banna kind of dumb sa lgtaa 😅 that you are running from the debate... So rn i'm confused 😂 don't know what to become... Lekin aik baat hai ky religion ko sirf us religion ky scriptures sy judge krna chahiye naa ky logon ko dekh kr... Or agr existence of God plus miracles wli baat ko maan lo ( without getting proves 😅 ) .... Being a religious person is not a bad deal, atheism never appealed to me, so i'm still doing research and trying to understand my religion.
Atheist got nothing to prove,
Main manta hu ki khuda hai or jo nahi manta us se mera ye sawal hai ke ye duniya ye kainaat or insan kese ban gaye agar wo iska jawab dedeta hai toh main maan lunga ki khuda nahi or wo kahega toh fir khuda ko kisne banaya toh usay kisi ne nahi banaya every created thing has a creater but God uncreated. wo hamesha se maujood hai aisa koi waqt he nahi tha ki jab wo na ho jab kuch nahi tha toh khuda he tha agar ispe gehrayaai se sochnge ki ye chize kaha se aayi toh aqal khud yehi kahi gi ke koi toh hoga sabse pehle jisne ya jis se ye sara sil sila shuru hua nahi toh athiest bata de ke kaha se a gaye hum insan aur ye paid paudhe chane suraj Or ye kainaat Or khuda ko jhuthlane wale toh hamesha aag me jalenge janlenge Or jalte rahenge
Bro please make a video on ACHARYA PRASHANT
❤❤❤🙏🙏🙏
Lack of belief in god = lack of purpose is an assumption. Purpose is not giving by god but religious institution who also teach castism, misogyny, superstitions etc
Humans have developed not by following blindly but by questioning. God doesn't teach to be moral because human, animal sacrifices, oppression is also done to satisfy god. We atheists do oppose the concept of god but more than that, we oppose these things which harm humanity
Toatlly Disagree With Thai Philosopher
Since he Never Underatand That humanism Nad humanity also can Be meaning of Life !!
Make a video on osho's philosophy
Love ur videos.
Bhai Sigmund Freud pe ek lecture bana sakte ho please?
Lenght kum karo
kya nihilism hi कारण hai ki hm basic rights ko pane ke liye bhi govt. se struggle kr rhe hain like employment, climate etc. Basic responsibility as a citizen bhool gye hain, or iam just overcomplicating it ?
There are no atheist who attack other atheists saying their atheism is better than others. Thats not true in case of religious people. Israel vs palastine war is an example. There are many more examples in History.
Bcz Athesim is a new religion... So why the hell a person attack a person in the same religion..😂😂😂
@@ad.satyamp.behera7181 No. Try to find out about "Charvaka " (take googles help)
Hitler maslini maozeding
Hitler maslini maozedin
@@ad.satyamp.behera7181 Atheism is NOT a religion.
तानाशाही पहले भी था जब भगवान को माना जा रहा था। जो मोरालिटी को डिसाइड कर रहा है इंसान लोग किसी भगवान की आवश्यकता नहीं है। हमें इसलिए मोरल होना हमें जरूरी है, क्योंकि हमें एक सुंदर समाज बनाना है। हमें सुंदर समाज इसलिए बनाना है, क्योंकि हम सुखी से रहे। अपने आप को स्वतंत्र महसूस करें, और यह सब बताने के लिए हमें कोई नहीं आने वाला। हमें हर विषय पर खुद ही सोच विचार करना चाहिए और बहस करना चाहिए और बातचीत करना चाहिए।
Read quran if you don't fear.....
@@farhanakhtar5799 वैसे मैं आपसे सिंपल सा सवाल करना चाहूंगा, कि आप मोहम्मद साहब का हर बात को मानते हो? इस सवाल का जवाब दीजिए उसके बाद एक और सवाल है।
@@farhanakhtar5799 bhai tum quantum physics padho, "If you don't fear"
Kyu sukh hi kyu chahiye?
sir plz speak in simple hindi and use english words for complicated hindi words plz sir so that we Pakistani can understand it.. lots of love from pakistan
I will try to give an example of what happening here for normie people so that they don’t get to a conclusion just by listening to him.
Eg: Bhojpuri superstar Khesari Lal criticised Stanley Kubrick because he didn’t understand anything.
You needed to analyze that none of this came true, and the reality is the least religious countries are the most moral and peaceful, and the most religious countries are most corrupt and immoral
I am middle in atheist and theist
The source of morality cannot be religion and God only and the morals even derived from God and religion are rigid which is the source of a lot of pain and suffering. Why does life need to have any meaning at all? It looks like we consider ourselves superior beings as we are just animals and try to find meaning in life through making up things like the concept of religion and so on. Looking at the state religion and God has brought to the world it feels the exact opposite of what is being described in this video has happened.
1. As a simple answer to atheistic freedom i will say that i won't kill or rape anyone because i don't want it to happen with me. It can sound selfish but yeah it is quite good answer, and even with religion morality is subjective (because you choose the religion whose morality feels best to you and feeling is a subjective thing, otherwise you like your born religion's morality so much that you follow it till you die)
And the police comparison of a controlling power doesn't really equates with god as a controller because you see god is presumed as good and perfect in his morality, because of which even if there is some parts of religion which can be considered and morally evil with human understanding, theists deny the evil and say god would have perfect reasons to do that.
In contrast with concept of police we know that they can be corrupt and they can do evil, that's why we can object to an evil act done by police, as they are not perfectly moral, but in case of god this is missing. Because of this i think morality should be out of the religion, if you think that these two cases are equivalent then god shouldn't be presumed as all good.
2. The thing about hope and purpose is a close call towards religion, but i would prefer to be in a meaningless world and to revolt against it, if i am not misrepresenting albert camus also talked about this that sisyphus has an impossible goal which he is never going to achieve, but still he revolts against that meaninglessness of his efforts, and if we see through the lenses of science the cosmos is more like the example.....cold, dark and meaningless, again i am not sure about my interpretation of camus so forgive me if i am wrong.
The thing about alienation, i will quite disagree because even with god if you put a small amount of people of one religion into an area which has a big amount of people of other religion, it is quite prevalent that they will also face alienation. So why don't be an atheist ? And also lgbt people are not accepted over the world, does that mean they should stop being who they are, obviously this leads to suicide and depression but this is revolting against the absurd.
3. If i assume all ethical statements are emotional attitudes and you can't define good and bad objectively with a theory, then i have perfect reasons to be kind to other people because it is my emotion that is driving me to do that, even if this sound vauge than you can have something like if i don't do good to the world then humanity might suffer in future and my children and their children might also suffer, so i will try my best to do as much good as i can to the world to prevent suffering. (2nd argument might be a slippery slope but you can use science to actually investigate consequences of your ignorance towards the world)
And the last point towards the economic and political instability sounds a bit slippery slope, and even faith is totally exploited against the human society, so yeah even in the absence of faith the demeaning factors of society will still persist but is can't be blamed on atheists.
After all Thank you for bringing this type of content in india, i hope this will lead to a healthy philosophical debates about these topics which aren't talked about that much. Keep it up bro. ❤️🤝
Bhagat Singh iske apvaad hai..... ??
I learn from everywhere
Jb God ha hi ni tu wo hamari responsibility kase ly ga?
Ap ny iss lecture ma kafi loop holes chor diye ha .
areh FD bhaiya ka views he personal views nhi he ismein
It believed that we are just animals. So basic purpose should be
Survive
Reproduce
Contribution
.................and follow mashlo need hirary.
So I thought that is meaning less finding what is meaning of life , purpose of life etc ...
Self aculation will part of life that need a poper time and stage of life when you have understood
Hmm.. maybe 🤔
forgot about god and purpose, you run and find a good English teacher
@@proudindian9140 my keyboard problem bro. 😆
FD baba khd b believe krte the kya? In argument se tw lagta ha fd baba ye keh rahe han k God ha ya k nh mje nh pata lekin God ko manna q zaroori ha ye mai btata hun
By simply common sense I don't believe in God: Charlie Chaplin.
If people are good only because they fear punishment and hope some reward.Then we are a sorry lot indeed: Albert Einstein
you work so hard but don't get views why
This writer one book where character handover himself to police after killing one lady ,
No god but his guilt forced him to do surrender after hideout
They know nothing about atheist
But what if someones god says murder this man or that man who is against or murder this man if he do this ??? In my opinion people govern themselves through more conscious thought sought of inner morality which comes from within although they really need god for some things but some people commit crime even if they are very keen follower of god and his values... The difference is when we commit any crime we have to be unconscious as if we don't know it's value or what we are doing just a like man who isn't functional and can't understand with his brain has disability it's difference between Englightent and those who are unlighted
God is like constitution of old time . Intellectuals use god to put morality in people but many find they way to do wrong and offer something to god to get clean here comes the constitution if you proved guilty no matter god forgive you or not you will get punish ❤🗿
"I wanted a bike but i can't afford it so I asked God to give it to me....,
But that's not how God works so I stole a bike and asked him for forgiveness🙏🤲....... "
12:08 You mean Empathy?
Fydor baba Agar god hai toh rokta kyu nahi criminal ko or yadi kuch kar nahi sakta toh, phir dar kiska, or yadi god hai nahi to phir discussion hi bekar hai.
You are judging fyodor too early brother his works are totally open and often people extract subjective meanings from it being a subjective is totally okay because nobody knows truth not even fyodor. Kafka, fyodor or whatever they are always open about something like 50-50 thing is it is depending upon a read how you gonna drink it cause you will never gonna know what was their original purpose to their works only they knew this. They are not particularly taking any side they want to say that” that’s how humans think” by contemplated their works. Title something like huge ambiguous work is total endorsement of subjectivity which will differ person to person
Itna bada sa comment pin kia hua hai bhai ne firr bhi ghoom firr k vahi baat krte ho yr 🤦
beautiful ❤
Ye sbse bada myth h ki agr sbi atheist ban jaege to morality khtm ho jaegi 😂😂
Optimistic nihilism ke pur ek video
There is no purpose of life and is meaningless😊lol😘🥰 : Optimistic Nihilism Explained.
Thank you ❤
My dear❤ap sirf Indian🇮🇳👳 ko mukhatib karty hu .ap ki zuban jahan bhi koi samhaj raha hu unhin bhi adrees mn shamil kr lia kro. Love n respect all viewers from Karachi Pakistan
Not true. I oppose. By nature we have no purpose of this life... We are just trying to look for some almighty to get some support. That is a imaginary entity. We can be better of just bby being human beings. Even after being so religious we are facing utmost severity and injustice and grave wars and human sufferings. The picture is neither good on the religious side.
I can understand your apprehensions but you have exaggerated this. It won't happen as you have said. Keep you eyes open to see the change.
Thank you
Bhai vo kyuu exaggerate krenge, jo uss philosopher ki philosophy hai vo poori tarah se bata di.
Philosopher pe ungli uthaao na, uss bande pe kyuu utha rahe ho jo bss uski baat samjha raha hai 🥲
same brother I also think god does not exist
Hmm... Yeah my doubt is with the philosopher only. The philosopher seems to be saying these prophecies long back so we need to amend them as per today's age.
His understanding is what he is... But there may be realms he won't know... Right? @@beast5912
idk why epople directly connect thiesm with irrationality and athiesm with intelect,,,huh