@@jasonalbert6251 I know its late but i am pretty sure that this wasnt actually an issue with osies pc, several of them have had this (including breeh and rythian and we know rythians pc is up to snuff) issue recently where it looks fine to them playing it but a weird setting on thier capture software makes the footage look crazy choppy.
It was kind of tricky, the math. Yes, you do the x then the +, but its based on the strips of color. A strip of green is 7, a strip of pink is 1 and 2 strips of yellow is 4. Since there was 2 strips of green and 3 strips of pink, the problem was actually 14 - 3 x 4 = 14 - 12 = 2
@@simonsonlyfan8600 I mean, if Ped has forfeited he doesn't really count as last because he's no longer in the race, ergo Lewis was last. Honestly I was waiting for him to say that.
Technically she wasn't lagging in game but what ever is encoding her video started to struggle probably due to firewall (since it was intermittent stuttering) which probably means gta runs off gpu and her encoder is done by cpu. i feel like osie just needs someone to slightly tweak her recording settings and she won't have issues, even changing frame size from traditional 1080p to 936p can reduce encoder cpu usage by 5-20% depending on cpu and also render more frames alot easier.
The math puzzle is based on size of the squares. There's 2(7) - (3(1) x 1(4)) = 14 - 12 = 2. You can see that there should be 3 of the pinks fit and 2 of the orange/yellows fit inside the actual formula.
It really wasn't that hard to figure out. The difference in size is pretty clear if you just look at it. The funny thing is them yelling about brackets.. brackets are only used when it actually goes against the normal order of operations. Or used when you end up with a number beside a number (as happens here when you plug in the numbers).
@@kane2742 They did (7-1)*4 = 24, not 7*4 = 24. And they only tried the "wrong" order of operations after the correct order of operations (7 - (1*4)) turned out wrong. Admittedly, only Ben did the latter for sure, but I imagine Zylus picked up on it, and everyone else pretty much just followed Zylus. The only thing they missed was the width part, which was painfully obtuse, especially coming after the shitload of stupid PEMDAS puzzles they've gotten so far. It really bothers me when people call them stupid after not paying any damn attention to what they were actually doing. They fuck up a lot, sure, but that doesn't mean you should assume they're fucking up literally every time something goes wrong.
@@jacobnorris8256 The puzzle isn't all that easy, everyone's trying to be entertaining, the map maker could easily have been wrong or just trolling, brute forcing the puzzle is easy, and they're doing a recording. Given all that I think it'd be remarkable if they did solve it the intended way
Half the fun of the Yogscast, or streamers in general really, is watching them be confidently wrong, then come up with explanations for why their incorrect solutions don't work.
Hey mathematician here. According to the number color theory of Hunkuleus as the first Greek Mathematician pink goes before green which means you just have to reverse the numbers with their Greek numeral counterparts. In summary the maths are telling me that Osie needs a new computer.
Ravs being the group baby at 28ish makes me happy. I swear, half of the reason I love the yogscast is that everyone seems to be my age or older. SEE, WORLD! I'M ALLOWED TO PLAY VIDEO GAMES. I'M NOT (that) OLD
I find the whole age expectation thing hilarious ... like people start wearing suits when they get older because it's age appropriate and "that's what old people wear" ... no lol ... those old people wore suits when they were younger and still do ..... hence my collection of awesome tshirts :p
Dude, I'm 40, and still play computer games. And apparently still use the word 'dude'. Do whatever makes you happy. I'll be playing computer games until I'm 108.
It actually surprised me somewhat to find out Ravs is a year younger than me. I thought he was somewhere in his thirties. Of course, all it really does is just make me feel older :(
Hey Simon and lewis. I just wanted to say that it’s amazing that this channel is still going strong I used to watch you guys religiously when I was younger, when I was 11-14 now I’m 22 coming back to see u guys growing older aswell but still going strong. Just wanted to say thank you for being such an important part of my youth!
You have to look at the sizes of the coloured blocks. So there’s two greens, meaning 14, three pinks, meaning 3 and one yellow meaning 4. The equation is then 14 - 3 * 4. Which makes 14 - 12 and finally 2.
The maths bit was actually pretty clever. I noticed the strips were smaller on the top than on the bottom, so therefore you add the amount of strips together to see what each strip means total. For example, the middle bit was 3 because there were 3 ones.
So freaking obvious. Why would the four be the same size but the others go from one width up to three width? Commentors on this video saying 'Actually quite difficult'. No. Not at all.
21:22 - I'm frustrated that they had to bypass that puzzle. The one component they were missing was that they weren't accounting for the size of the units as part of the maths# Edit: 24:49 - Thank God one of you lot knows how these things work! Bless the Editor!
@@TheGibzar The size of the units in the sum are ~integers of the units themselves. Look at the editor portion at the very end of the video for a better visualisation than I could give.
@@G3HP oh see I get that's what they did. I don't get how you're supposed to know that intuitively. I would have just had to brute force it because as far as I'm concerned, the answer is 3
@Deader Survival It absolutely is compatible with normal maths and variables, the sum works out to (2x7) - ((3x1) x (1x4)) = 14 - (3 x 4) = 14 - 12 = 2
The Maths actually makes sense if you understand the language they're using: two yellow 'beams' side to side = 4. One green beam = 7. One pink beam = 1. Then the equation reads: 2 green beams minus three pink beams times two yellow beams. In other words: 2x7 - 3x1x4 = 14 - 12 = 2.
Man, this video was perfect. You’ve got such a great crew that has excellent chemistry and it shows so much here. Thank you Yogs for years of entertainment.
If I hadn't seen the Editor explaining it at the end, I would have explained it. What's scarier is I can't tell if Pedguin sat back and noticed that detail, or just used his Psychopath powers to guess the right answer. I don't believe his "Closest thing", so either way, he's trolling them and I love it.
Tbh, I didn't even notice multiple strips. In custom maps, things being consistent sizes is rarely possible (or map creators rarely bother) so the fact that shape size was suddenly a factor, when no other map has had such a thing, flew over my head. I can't really blame the yogs for not getting this one :/
Well, they should have known they got something wrong when the answer they came to didnt progress them, but no, they went full on rage mode that they were right and the map was faulty... which was not the case. And designing things other people havent designed is what makes a good designer.
@@Shovi_ Sure, but that's trusting the map creator knows what their doing... This is a GTA custom map, not a professional level. Most of these maps aren't exactly "high quality" lol
Ahhh, see the second time I properly looked at it (when Osie got to the math problem) I thought it was a bit odd that the shapes were differently sized and I thought that might've been relevant but didn't care enough to try and figure it out, big thanks to whoever figured it out in the ending though, muchos satisfying.
You know what, I love math and even I got baited by that math puzzle. I didn't see the different widths of of each piece until it was spelled out by the editors. Thanks for that. I think I'm getting contact Yog from too much exposure to them. Can't do my maths now.
The maths makes sense, but essentially the width of the objects is relevent. 1 width of green is 7. 1 width of pink is 1, and 2 widths of orange is 4. So 1g = 7, 1p = 1 and 2o = 4. The equation is 2g - (3p x 2o), which means 14 - (3 x 4) which comes out to 14 - 12 which is 2. And the second hole is the answer
I have a big test tomorrow and thought watching a yogs gta would help calm me down and boy was I wrong… that first race has got to be the most stressful/entertaining thing I’ve ever seen
omg, the maths puzzle with the green, pink and orange, it was one of those Facebook puzzles where the width matters (2*7) - (3*1) x 4 14 - 12 2 it's hole 2
Why would they? The only indication that size mattered was that the last key shape and the middle equation shape were slightly bigger which could be map maker error as much as it could be relevant. Plus, they were probably already frustrated at that point having tried to play find the weasel with a stupid hole that's unmarked and difficult to see for TWENTY MINUTES. And that's not getting into the fact that implicit addition is nonsense anyway, since variables are still subject to the normal rules of math. Not being combined first and then mathed.
@@deadersurvival4716 That's all bollocks. The four is the same size, the one goes from a single width in the key to triple width in the equation. Replace colour with any of the memetic maths problems involving fruit, where two oranges equals such and such amount, but in the equation, there are only one and half oranges. Two sevens, three ones, one four. The four being double wide in key and equation is immaterial when two single oranges would be two and two, aka four.
@@skarloeythomas5172 That's not how algebra works. If your numerical replacement is a color, you don't determine a multiple based on size. You do it by AMOUNT. Sod off.
@@deadersurvival4716 Silly goose. There are two amounts of green and three amounts of purple, or whatever. You need to be able to effect even an elementary whit of logic in maths, including algebra. Don't get snotty with people when you come up short.
@@skarloeythomas5172 Silly redditor, there's no multiple amounts, as that would require clear boundaries that aren't there. Piss off. Don't be stupid when you don't have basic vision.
The ending cap explaining the problem just made my brain hurt more, because it shows the "4" block is indeed made double-wide in the key, so it's still a single 4 while the others are single-wide, indicating the possibility of duplicate numbers in the equation EXCEPT for the 4. Freaking troll math.
I can understand missing the math trick with the multiple strips of a color meaning add more of the same number (the three strips of pink = 3), but it's crazy that all of them don't follow order of operations.
Yes; her recordings have sometimes been... quite laggy. It's fine sometimes, but other times it's about a two or three frames per second. Feel bad for her if that's how it actually looks for her in-game!
@@eivind261093 Pretty sure if it was actually what her game looked like she would be talking about it, I suspect it has something to do with her recordings.
the math puzzle is one of those shit trick ones where it's like, a bunch of 3 bananas = 6 but in the question it only shows 1 banana, so its the number 2... in this case it was the size of the shapes that changed the values
I thought I was so smart with that maths question. As soon as I saw it I thought that the size of the coloured sections above decides the numbers on the bottom. so orange is already the same size so it stays as 4, the green for 7 looks like 2 sections of one above so it would be 77 and the pink 1 looks like 3 sections of the top one together so it makes 111. So it would be 77-111x4. I then realised I was no better at maths than they are as this comes to -136 🤦♂️
Sorry mate, but that's -367. Still, your interpretation of the puzzle makes more sense than what the map maker intended. Implicit addition is not a thing. Substituting colored blocks with the digit is reasonable. The algebraically correct solution (colored blocks are variables) is 7⋅7 - 1⋅1⋅1 ⋅ 4 = 45.
Here's how that math problem worked for those who are confused. The key is the size of the rectangles as you'll notice the green and pink are smaller than they are in the problem. So in the math problem, it's (2 x 7) - (3 x 1) x (1 x 4) as there are 2 greens added together, 3 pinks added together, and 1 yellow square respectively. So following order of operations, it's (14) - (3) x (4) = 14 - 12 = 2. The answer is in-fact, 2.
The math answer is two because the green and pink are only fractions of the squares in the question so it comes out to two green rectangles which is 14 (2 x 7) minus three rectangles which is 3 (3 x 1) multiplied by one orange square which is 4 so written out its 14 - 3 x 4 following bedmas you get = 14 - 3 x 4 = 14 - (3 x 4) = 14 - 12 = 2 Like so people can see this and understand pls
20:48 So the reason it's 2 and not 3 is because of the width of the coloured boxes. The variables are: 4 = 2-wide orange, 7 = 1-wide green, 1 = 1-wide pink: The equation is: 2-wide green minus 3-wide pink times 2-wide orange This becomes: (2 lots of 7) minus (3 lots of 1) times (1 lot of 4) = 14 - 3 x 4 = 14 - 12 = 2 This maths puzzle has big viral facebook post energy. Edit: Okay I made it to the end and saw the editors already explained it :V good work 💪
The Math problem was literally just one of those spam facebook pictures that are like "Solve this equation" but the number of items that = a number change throughout to throw people off.
Some of you guys screaming about how the math is easy when the yogs have been slamming their heads at this for like 12+ minutes and getting miffed and a tad frustrated. Try being calm and logical after all that lol
@@realfangplays AND PUZZLES NEED TO HAVE RULES TO GET YOU TO THE CORRECT ANSWER. IF YOU CAN"T DO BASIC MATH, THEN DON'T INCLUDE IT IN YOUR FUCKING MAP.
orange square = a = 4 green RECTANGLE = b = 7 pink RECTANGLE = c = 1 The size of the shapes needs to be considered when doing the math puzzle. Math Problem(as it appears) 2(b) - 3(c) * 1(a) = 2(7) - 3(1) * 1(4) = 14 - 3 * 4 = 2
Maths is based on the width of the colors as well as the color themselves. The green one was 2 wide and thus there was 2 'greens' making it two 7s or 14. pink was 3 wide and it was a 1 so three 1s is 3 and the orange was only was wide of 1 so one 4 is 4. So the real math was 14 - 3 x 4 = So 14 - 3 x 4 = 14 - 12 14 - 12 = 2
The math makes sense, the map maker should have spaced out the pieces a bit more and had a single yellow to show that it's multiple boards of color with each having the value of the single board (besides 4, which is 2 boards for some reason). g=7, p=1, y=4 where it's 2(g)-3(p)*1(y), 2(7)-3*4, 14-12, so the answer is 2.
Everyone failed to notice the math puzzle was meant as a distraction so you wouldn't figure out you're just supposed to trial and error it. Like the rest of the entire map.
honestly found it funny how they just didnt care to even try and solve the math riddle they just took it at face value and when that failed they rammed there face into it until it worked. The only puzle on the map was the math which was very clever, dont be upset that you didnt get it and dont be mad at the map maker for not "explaning" how to solve his riddle cause thats the whole point of those, to solve the problem and use your brain.
It's like those stupid Facebook memes where 1 👞 = 4 so 👞👞 = 8. Each colour was either 1 or 2 blocks and then in the equation underneath they were more blocks which equate to 3 of the pink or 2 of the green etc
The math's puzzle is solved as such: Orange = 4 Green = 7 Pink = 1 In the equation their are: 3 lines of Pink = 3 2 lines of Green = 14 3 times 4 = 12 14 minus 12 = 2 So the answer is hole 2
I don't get pissed off watching people play games but seeing everyone rag on the map because they didn't do the maths right was infuriating... 10/10 video
so that math problem had width of the number. green was width was 2 so it was 14, pink was 3 wide so it was 3 and the last one was one widh and that made it 4. 14 - 3 x 4 which is calculated with folds first which is 3x4 = 12 so 14 - 12.
The maths answer was 2 because the thickness of the panels needed to be accounted for. Green is 7; orange is 4; and magenta is 1; however, the green was two panels wide making the green in the equation equal to 14. So double green minus triple magenta times orange is 14 - 3 x 4. In order of operations, 3 x 4 = 12, and 14 - 12 = 2. Ped is the luckiest sob in the Yogscast.
The fact that they didn't understand the maths room was soooo frustrating. You had to look at width of the color, there were 3 "1" numbers and 2 "7" numbers, and you had to add them together. so it s actually 7 - 3 x 4. Not hard, easy to see, classic gaff. XD
Here is the answer to the maths section. the lines to green and purple are thicker in the equation then in the section showing the values so the problem becomes (7x2)-[(1x3)x4]=14-(3x4)=14-12=2
the maths, the green is 2 wide whereas 7 is only one green tile wide , so its 14 , the pink is 3 wide and one wide is 1 so its 3 then you have (7+7) - (1+1+1) *4 which makes 14-(3*4) which makes 14-12 = 2
So, just looking at that board I would have done the math one of two ways. Either 77 - 111 x 4 (77 - 444 = -367), OR, 7x7 - 1x1x1 x 4 (49 - 1 x 4 = 45)...I think I'd get there eventually because neither answer makes sense for the map, but I would say the formatting is wrong rather than the math is wrong.
Again you guys and your brackets, you dont need brackets in this equation 7-1*4=3, you only use brackets it it was something like this 7-(1*4)*2=-1 And as others have said, that isnt even the way you solve this facebook math problem
For anyone wondering, the math problem equals 2 because 1 and 7 were individual columns. There were 2 green columns making 14, and 3 pink making 3. That makes 14 - 3*4, which equals 2.
I love Osie’s power point presentation
As someone with a notebook made in the 2010's, I aprove of this representation! It's nigh time for the Yogscast to be inclusive to old bricks!
Osie is best! Osie’s computer, on the other hand…
@@jasonalbert6251 I know its late but i am pretty sure that this wasnt actually an issue with osies pc, several of them have had this (including breeh and rythian and we know rythians pc is up to snuff) issue recently where it looks fine to them playing it but a weird setting on thier capture software makes the footage look crazy choppy.
It was kind of tricky, the math. Yes, you do the x then the +, but its based on the strips of color. A strip of green is 7, a strip of pink is 1 and 2 strips of yellow is 4. Since there was 2 strips of green and 3 strips of pink, the problem was actually 14 - 3 x 4 = 14 - 12 = 2
Yep, even the editor knew at the end.
these map makers do a piss poor job of explaining anything
@@SmokeyEdits It's purpsoefully misleading lmao
@@alphasword5541 intentionally being obtuse with your mechanics isn't design
@@SmokeyEdits They used the visual of different sized squares to show this. 4 was the only 2 wide. The 7 and 1 was 1 wide. So it was 2 7s and 3 1s.
Confirmed: Lewis doesn't know what last place is.
He's a cheater!
If you're not first you're last~
Of course, he's a cheater. Would probably be a new rule that allows prox bombs for 6th place if Ped throws the race
@@simonsonlyfan8600 I mean, if Ped has forfeited he doesn't really count as last because he's no longer in the race, ergo Lewis was last. Honestly I was waiting for him to say that.
Ped was Jeep (7:09) that's not a racing position so Lewis was last. :D
The cuts to Osie lagging out were funny
Technically she wasn't lagging in game but what ever is encoding her video started to struggle probably due to firewall (since it was intermittent stuttering) which probably means gta runs off gpu and her encoder is done by cpu. i feel like osie just needs someone to slightly tweak her recording settings and she won't have issues, even changing frame size from traditional 1080p to 936p can reduce encoder cpu usage by 5-20% depending on cpu and also render more frames alot easier.
@@tomhalf3018 bro got a PHD in lag
@@tomhalf3018 Her video is always laggy - just never this bad
@@tomhalf3018 🤓
@@maxrichardson5252 He's Dr. Lag Bro, PhD.
White knighting all the ladies' encoding issues, while doffing his cap, m'lady.
Love that the editor put in the explanation at the end, wonder if they were as frustrated watching as some other commenters lol
I love that many of the commenters clearly did not watch the whole video
Agreed, that was a very satisfying edit
I also love how the answer was simple PEMDAS and ensuring you pay attention to shapes, both of which these guys can't do.
I don’t get why there’s 2 7s by only 1 4
@@Cheesepuff8 it's the sizes of the colour boxes.
The math puzzle is based on size of the squares. There's 2(7) - (3(1) x 1(4)) = 14 - 12 = 2. You can see that there should be 3 of the pinks fit and 2 of the orange/yellows fit inside the actual formula.
Yeah, it's just like those awful Facebook memes "only 1% can solve"
it was so infuriating to see them not getting it.
I'm glad I'm not the only one that understood lol
It really wasn't that hard to figure out. The difference in size is pretty clear if you just look at it. The funny thing is them yelling about brackets.. brackets are only used when it actually goes against the normal order of operations. Or used when you end up with a number beside a number (as happens here when you plug in the numbers).
good I am not the only one who got it, like it is sooo annoying to see them not get it
Making the equation have an actual puzzle element is just disastrous when they struggle with even the basic math parts.
Yeah, they were struggling without the puzzle part.
@@kane2742 They did (7-1)*4 = 24, not 7*4 = 24.
And they only tried the "wrong" order of operations after the correct order of operations (7 - (1*4)) turned out wrong. Admittedly, only Ben did the latter for sure, but I imagine Zylus picked up on it, and everyone else pretty much just followed Zylus.
The only thing they missed was the width part, which was painfully obtuse, especially coming after the shitload of stupid PEMDAS puzzles they've gotten so far.
It really bothers me when people call them stupid after not paying any damn attention to what they were actually doing. They fuck up a lot, sure, but that doesn't mean you should assume they're fucking up literally every time something goes wrong.
@@jacobnorris8256 The puzzle isn't all that easy, everyone's trying to be entertaining, the map maker could easily have been wrong or just trolling, brute forcing the puzzle is easy, and they're doing a recording.
Given all that I think it'd be remarkable if they did solve it the intended way
Half the fun of the Yogscast, or streamers in general really, is watching them be confidently wrong, then come up with explanations for why their incorrect solutions don't work.
Hey mathematician here.
According to the number color theory of Hunkuleus as the first Greek Mathematician pink goes before green which means you just have to reverse the numbers with their Greek numeral counterparts.
In summary the maths are telling me that Osie needs a new computer.
Ravs being the group baby at 28ish makes me happy. I swear, half of the reason I love the yogscast is that everyone seems to be my age or older. SEE, WORLD! I'M ALLOWED TO PLAY VIDEO GAMES. I'M NOT (that) OLD
I find the whole age expectation thing hilarious ... like people start wearing suits when they get older because it's age appropriate and "that's what old people wear" ... no lol ... those old people wore suits when they were younger and still do ..... hence my collection of awesome tshirts :p
Dude, I'm 40, and still play computer games. And apparently still use the word 'dude'.
Do whatever makes you happy. I'll be playing computer games until I'm 108.
Nobody asked
@@MultiComare just like noone wanted you but your mother couldn't find the coat hanger so now we're stuck with you
It actually surprised me somewhat to find out Ravs is a year younger than me. I thought he was somewhere in his thirties. Of course, all it really does is just make me feel older :(
Honastly, I love the police and army shooting at them while they are shooting at each other.
It just adds an additional level of CHAOS and CARNAGE.
I love Lewis yelling about Ben constantly facing him during the slalom while he keeps doing it backwards 🤣🤣
The Yogs’ inability to read the minimal or follow the arrows on the checkpoints never ceases to amaze me
The first race was one of the best ever. So much chaos!
Hey Simon and lewis. I just wanted to say that it’s amazing that this channel is still going strong I used to watch you guys religiously when I was younger, when I was 11-14 now I’m 22 coming back to see u guys growing older aswell but still going strong. Just wanted to say thank you for being such an important part of my youth!
welcome back a lot has changed
Hey, welcome back :D:_yogPoon3:
I need their reaction to the solution of the math puzzle revealed.
me too.
You have to look at the sizes of the coloured blocks. So there’s two greens, meaning 14, three pinks, meaning 3 and one yellow meaning 4. The equation is then 14 - 3 * 4. Which makes 14 - 12 and finally 2.
@@noralexanderbruun6950 Not the solution, them seeing the finished video where the editor figured it out.
@@whiskeyhound i totally misread, sorry xD
@@noralexanderbruun6950 all good
at 6:30 Lewis was somehow transported to Coconut Mall on the Wii version of Mario Kart
The maths bit was actually pretty clever. I noticed the strips were smaller on the top than on the bottom, so therefore you add the amount of strips together to see what each strip means total. For example, the middle bit was 3 because there were 3 ones.
So freaking obvious. Why would the four be the same size but the others go from one width up to three width? Commentors on this video saying 'Actually quite difficult'. No. Not at all.
@@skarloeythomas5172idk about so fucking obvious,
but yes it was there to see.
Nothing confuses British people more than extremely predictable, pre-planned, grid-based roads
Grid roads are awful to be fair.
@@Shoefae what's awful about predictable and easy to navigate roads?
Nothing confuses American people more than schools that don't allow children to be shot.
@@mrduck5182 terrible for traffic
@@mrduck5182 so so much.
We need a "Gone in 69 minutes" or something for old times sakes
When Zylus yelled Pedquin is in a Jeep @6:55 I cracked laughing so hard.
21:22 - I'm frustrated that they had to bypass that puzzle. The one component they were missing was that they weren't accounting for the size of the units as part of the maths#
Edit: 24:49 - Thank God one of you lot knows how these things work! Bless the Editor!
Honestly what the hell does the size of the square have to do with it, good lord. Least intuitive thing I've ever seen.
@@TheGibzar The size of the units in the sum are ~integers of the units themselves. Look at the editor portion at the very end of the video for a better visualisation than I could give.
@@G3HP oh see I get that's what they did. I don't get how you're supposed to know that intuitively. I would have just had to brute force it because as far as I'm concerned, the answer is 3
@@G3HP You say that as if it makes any sense maths wise. That's not how variables work.
@Deader Survival It absolutely is compatible with normal maths and variables, the sum works out to (2x7) - ((3x1) x (1x4)) = 14 - (3 x 4) = 14 - 12 = 2
The puzzle maps are puzzles in the same way that a statement is a riddle
what's in my pocket?
@@Khunkurisu Lint or nothing, apparently
24:19 Anyone else embarrassed by the fact that this many adults didnt notice that the shape of the numbers matter? Just me? 🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣
The Maths actually makes sense if you understand the language they're using: two yellow 'beams' side to side = 4. One green beam = 7. One pink beam = 1. Then the equation reads: 2 green beams minus three pink beams times two yellow beams. In other words: 2x7 - 3x1x4 = 14 - 12 = 2.
Man, this video was perfect. You’ve got such a great crew that has excellent chemistry and it shows so much here.
Thank you Yogs for years of entertainment.
Easily one of my favorite GTA videos ever. One of the best endings to a video ever. Love the editing. Hope they watch it!
If I hadn't seen the Editor explaining it at the end, I would have explained it.
What's scarier is I can't tell if Pedguin sat back and noticed that detail, or just used his Psychopath powers to guess the right answer. I don't believe his "Closest thing", so either way, he's trolling them and I love it.
Ped absolutely just used his goblin logic and got the right answer lol
Damn that's one dedicated Officer at 8:30
Tbh, I didn't even notice multiple strips. In custom maps, things being consistent sizes is rarely possible (or map creators rarely bother) so the fact that shape size was suddenly a factor, when no other map has had such a thing, flew over my head. I can't really blame the yogs for not getting this one :/
Well, they should have known they got something wrong when the answer they came to didnt progress them, but no, they went full on rage mode that they were right and the map was faulty... which was not the case. And designing things other people havent designed is what makes a good designer.
@@Shovi_ Sure, but that's trusting the map creator knows what their doing... This is a GTA custom map, not a professional level. Most of these maps aren't exactly "high quality" lol
Ahhh, see the second time I properly looked at it (when Osie got to the math problem) I thought it was a bit odd that the shapes were differently sized and I thought that might've been relevant but didn't care enough to try and figure it out, big thanks to whoever figured it out in the ending though, muchos satisfying.
I didn't even consider taking the size of the squares into account.
You know what, I love math and even I got baited by that math puzzle. I didn't see the different widths of of each piece until it was spelled out by the editors. Thanks for that.
I think I'm getting contact Yog from too much exposure to them. Can't do my maths now.
the thinkness of the colours also count inth e maths problem. it ends up being (2*7)-(1*3)*4 = 14-3*4 = 14-12 =2
Love you guys been watching since the start of the early shadow of israphel series.
The maths makes sense, but essentially the width of the objects is relevent. 1 width of green is 7. 1 width of pink is 1, and 2 widths of orange is 4. So 1g = 7, 1p = 1 and 2o = 4. The equation is 2g - (3p x 2o), which means 14 - (3 x 4) which comes out to 14 - 12 which is 2. And the second hole is the answer
I have a big test tomorrow and thought watching a yogs gta would help calm me down and boy was I wrong… that first race has got to be the most stressful/entertaining thing I’ve ever seen
omg, the maths puzzle with the green, pink and orange, it was one of those Facebook puzzles where the width matters
(2*7) - (3*1) x 4
14 - 12
2
it's hole 2
Yeeted my phone across the room when not a single one of them noticed the shapes in the equation were different to they ones in the key.
Why would they? The only indication that size mattered was that the last key shape and the middle equation shape were slightly bigger which could be map maker error as much as it could be relevant. Plus, they were probably already frustrated at that point having tried to play find the weasel with a stupid hole that's unmarked and difficult to see for TWENTY MINUTES. And that's not getting into the fact that implicit addition is nonsense anyway, since variables are still subject to the normal rules of math. Not being combined first and then mathed.
@@deadersurvival4716 That's all bollocks. The four is the same size, the one goes from a single width in the key to triple width in the equation.
Replace colour with any of the memetic maths problems involving fruit, where two oranges equals such and such amount, but in the equation, there are only one and half oranges.
Two sevens, three ones, one four. The four being double wide in key and equation is immaterial when two single oranges would be two and two, aka four.
@@skarloeythomas5172 That's not how algebra works. If your numerical replacement is a color, you don't determine a multiple based on size. You do it by AMOUNT. Sod off.
@@deadersurvival4716 Silly goose. There are two amounts of green and three amounts of purple, or whatever. You need to be able to effect even an elementary whit of logic in maths, including algebra. Don't get snotty with people when you come up short.
@@skarloeythomas5172 Silly redditor, there's no multiple amounts, as that would require clear boundaries that aren't there. Piss off.
Don't be stupid when you don't have basic vision.
The ending cap explaining the problem just made my brain hurt more, because it shows the "4" block is indeed made double-wide in the key, so it's still a single 4 while the others are single-wide, indicating the possibility of duplicate numbers in the equation EXCEPT for the 4.
Freaking troll math.
I can understand missing the math trick with the multiple strips of a color meaning add more of the same number (the three strips of pink = 3), but it's crazy that all of them don't follow order of operations.
20:23 Zylus cannot do math confirmed, you always mutliply before you add or subtract, it's a mathematical rule everyone should know
Is osie viewpoint a slide show for anyone else? Around 20:00
Yes; her recordings have sometimes been... quite laggy. It's fine sometimes, but other times it's about a two or three frames per second. Feel bad for her if that's how it actually looks for her in-game!
@@eivind261093 Pretty sure if it was actually what her game looked like she would be talking about it, I suspect it has something to do with her recordings.
2:00 I can't believe after all this time they still haven't realized that the big arrows on top of the checkpoints point to the next checkpoint...
You know it's a bullcrap puzzle map when the crab bucket doesn't happen
You needed to pay attention to the thickness of the colour strips. 2 made complete sense.
the math puzzle is one of those shit trick ones where it's like, a bunch of 3 bananas = 6
but in the question it only shows 1 banana, so its the number 2...
in this case it was the size of the shapes that changed the values
The chaos is amazing
I thought I was so smart with that maths question. As soon as I saw it I thought that the size of the coloured sections above decides the numbers on the bottom. so orange is already the same size so it stays as 4, the green for 7 looks like 2 sections of one above so it would be 77 and the pink 1 looks like 3 sections of the top one together so it makes 111. So it would be 77-111x4. I then realised I was no better at maths than they are as this comes to -136 🤦♂️
Sorry mate, but that's -367. Still, your interpretation of the puzzle makes more sense than what the map maker intended. Implicit addition is not a thing. Substituting colored blocks with the digit is reasonable. The algebraically correct solution (colored blocks are variables) is 7⋅7 - 1⋅1⋅1 ⋅ 4 = 45.
two green bars is (7+7) - tree pink bars is (1+1+1) x two yellow bars is (4) = 14 - (3x4) =14 - 12 = 2
Here's how that math problem worked for those who are confused.
The key is the size of the rectangles as you'll notice the green and pink are smaller than they are in the problem.
So in the math problem, it's (2 x 7) - (3 x 1) x (1 x 4) as there are 2 greens added together, 3 pinks added together, and 1 yellow square respectively.
So following order of operations, it's (14) - (3) x (4) = 14 - 12 = 2. The answer is in-fact, 2.
21:19 do they really not realize its because the shapes mean multiples of the numbers? its 14-12
No, once someone makes a mistake they don't bother putting their own mind at work and going against the grain.
Lewis never gets enough credit. Well done Lewis!!
Great video as always.
Ben: *answers 3 when the answer is 2*
Ben: I ANSWERED IT RIGHT THOUGH! THE MAPMAKER DID MATHS WRONG
The math answer is two because the green and pink are only fractions of the squares in the question so it comes out to two green rectangles which is 14 (2 x 7) minus three rectangles which is 3 (3 x 1) multiplied by one orange square which is 4 so written out its 14 - 3 x 4 following bedmas you get
= 14 - 3 x 4
= 14 - (3 x 4)
= 14 - 12
= 2
Like so people can see this and understand pls
20:48 So the reason it's 2 and not 3 is because of the width of the coloured boxes.
The variables are: 4 = 2-wide orange, 7 = 1-wide green, 1 = 1-wide pink:
The equation is: 2-wide green minus 3-wide pink times 2-wide orange
This becomes: (2 lots of 7) minus (3 lots of 1) times (1 lot of 4) = 14 - 3 x 4 = 14 - 12 = 2
This maths puzzle has big viral facebook post energy.
Edit: Okay I made it to the end and saw the editors already explained it :V good work 💪
Love the closing shot
Urggggh more Yogscast failing basic maths, did no one learn from last time !!!
The Math problem was literally just one of those spam facebook pictures that are like "Solve this equation" but the number of items that = a number change throughout to throw people off.
The colored bars are a certain width; It's actually 14-3*4=2. The 7 is twice as wide as the reference shape, and the 1 is 3 times as wide.
The twenty-four represented a concept not a number! two *for* the win! 24!
Some of you guys screaming about how the math is easy when the yogs have been slamming their heads at this for like 12+ minutes and getting miffed and a tad frustrated. Try being calm and logical after all that lol
Or noticing shit like fucking shape sizes when there's no indication of it other than the middle one happens to be just a bit bigger.
@@deadersurvival4716 Did the PUZZLE not have everything spelled out for you. Its not an academic test.
@@realfangplays AND PUZZLES NEED TO HAVE RULES TO GET YOU TO THE CORRECT ANSWER. IF YOU CAN"T DO BASIC MATH, THEN DON'T INCLUDE IT IN YOUR FUCKING MAP.
@@deadersurvival4716 Lol, if you can't understand the basic rules, then don't play puzzle maps
orange square = a = 4
green RECTANGLE = b = 7
pink RECTANGLE = c = 1
The size of the shapes needs to be considered when doing the math puzzle.
Math Problem(as it appears)
2(b) - 3(c) * 1(a) =
2(7) - 3(1) * 1(4) =
14 - 3 * 4 =
2
Maths is based on the width of the colors as well as the color themselves. The green one was 2 wide and thus there was 2 'greens' making it two 7s or 14. pink was 3 wide and it was a 1 so three 1s is 3 and the orange was only was wide of 1 so one 4 is 4. So the real math was 14 - 3 x 4 =
So
14 - 3 x 4 = 14 - 12
14 - 12 = 2
The math makes sense, the map maker should have spaced out the pieces a bit more and had a single yellow to show that it's multiple boards of color with each having the value of the single board (besides 4, which is 2 boards for some reason).
g=7, p=1, y=4 where it's 2(g)-3(p)*1(y), 2(7)-3*4, 14-12, so the answer is 2.
No, it doesn't, because even when you space out the pieces, that's not how variables work. x+x*y+y+y*z is x+xy+y+yz, not 2x+3y+z
Everyone failed to notice the math puzzle was meant as a distraction so you wouldn't figure out you're just supposed to trial and error it. Like the rest of the entire map.
for the math, think of it like boxes
it was
2 greens - 3 pinks x 1 orange
so basicly
14-3x4
so 3x4 = 12
14-12=2
I love how people get confused by these easy maths questions. How do people forget that multiplication/division is first?
Holy moly, Mr. Editor is big brain with the maths solution at the end wp
honestly found it funny how they just didnt care to even try and solve the math riddle they just took it at face value and when that failed they rammed there face into it until it worked. The only puzle on the map was the math which was very clever, dont be upset that you didnt get it and dont be mad at the map maker for not "explaning" how to solve his riddle cause thats the whole point of those, to solve the problem and use your brain.
It's like those stupid Facebook memes where 1 👞 = 4 so 👞👞 = 8. Each colour was either 1 or 2 blocks and then in the equation underneath they were more blocks which equate to 3 of the pink or 2 of the green etc
The math's puzzle is solved as such:
Orange = 4
Green = 7
Pink = 1
In the equation their are:
3 lines of Pink = 3
2 lines of Green = 14
3 times 4 = 12
14 minus 12 = 2
So the answer is hole 2
I don't get pissed off watching people play games but seeing everyone rag on the map because they didn't do the maths right was infuriating... 10/10 video
I miss the rage-quit races and monster truck obstacle courses.
This video proves that my method is the best. When presented with a locked door requiring math I grab a hammer and smash the soft wall next to it.
so that math problem had width of the number. green was width was 2 so it was 14, pink was 3 wide so it was 3 and the last one was one widh and that made it 4. 14 - 3 x 4 which is calculated with folds first which is 3x4 = 12 so 14 - 12.
Nice change of pace instead of crab bucket
That maths reveil at the end was great
The maths answer was 2 because the thickness of the panels needed to be accounted for. Green is 7; orange is 4; and magenta is 1; however, the green was two panels wide making the green in the equation equal to 14. So double green minus triple magenta times orange is 14 - 3 x 4. In order of operations, 3 x 4 = 12, and 14 - 12 = 2. Ped is the luckiest sob in the Yogscast.
The fact that they didn't understand the maths room was soooo frustrating. You had to look at width of the color, there were 3 "1" numbers and 2 "7" numbers, and you had to add them together. so it s actually 7 - 3 x 4. Not hard, easy to see, classic gaff. XD
3:28 lmao
Here is the answer to the maths section. the lines to green and purple are thicker in the equation then in the section showing the values so the problem becomes (7x2)-[(1x3)x4]=14-(3x4)=14-12=2
the maths, the green is 2 wide whereas 7 is only one green tile wide , so its 14 , the pink is 3 wide and one wide is 1 so its 3 then you have (7+7) - (1+1+1) *4 which makes 14-(3*4) which makes 14-12 = 2
They''ve been playing this for about a decade and don't realise that the checkpoints have arrows pointing to the next checkpoint
I am so glad they did the math explanation at the end 😂
lol that math solution edited in at the end ty
Yogscast GTA V rules are like Calvin Ball from Calvin and Hobbes.
It's the size of the color blocks... changes what the number is. They are sneaky brackets.
one width green = 7 one width pink = 1: 14 - (3 x 4)
So, just looking at that board I would have done the math one of two ways. Either 77 - 111 x 4 (77 - 444 = -367), OR, 7x7 - 1x1x1 x 4 (49 - 1 x 4 = 45)...I think I'd get there eventually because neither answer makes sense for the map, but I would say the formatting is wrong rather than the math is wrong.
The math bit was 14-3x4, they added extra panels to signify multiple numbers
the map maker's math truly was on another level
The thickness of the colored lines indicate the real numbers first, so It says 14-3x4, but multiplication first so 3x4=12. 14-12=2
Goddamn Ravs contributing nothing the whole puzzle race and exploiting the tea party kindness to take first place.
Again you guys and your brackets, you dont need brackets in this equation 7-1*4=3, you only use brackets it it was something like this 7-(1*4)*2=-1
And as others have said, that isnt even the way you solve this facebook math problem
Math wasn't wrong, they just didn't comprehend the whole puzzle.
Love it and yeah the math was done poorly but that's typical I'd you do the dumb math problems so many are that way
Was the final explanation really necessary; pretty sure everyone was screaming that at their screen while watching already x,D
For anyone wondering, the math problem equals 2 because 1 and 7 were individual columns. There were 2 green columns making 14, and 3 pink making 3. That makes 14 - 3*4, which equals 2.
Watching hero's white knighting, is like knowing radio 1 is not for you anymore.