Aboard One of the Biggest Container Ships in the World | The New York Times

แชร์
ฝัง
  • เผยแพร่เมื่อ 31 ธ.ค. 2024

ความคิดเห็น • 209

  • @poogan1239
    @poogan1239 6 ปีที่แล้ว +467

    When the crew is not working, they enjoy: hot meals (picture of salad bar), a cinema (42' tv), a swimming pool (empty), and a workout room (1 multi use machine). Extravagant!!....

    • @PatrickWagz
      @PatrickWagz 6 ปีที่แล้ว +20

      The "cinema" wasn't even turned on (or it's broken)
      HAHA

    • @ekimfehc
      @ekimfehc 6 ปีที่แล้ว +17

      $$$ is good though

    • @xijinpooh223
      @xijinpooh223 6 ปีที่แล้ว +6

      The pool is empty because the water in it weighs the ship down mostly when it shakes probably doesn't affect the ship much because of it's size but you get the point

    • @Genius_at_Work
      @Genius_at_Work 6 ปีที่แล้ว +29

      @@xijinpooh223 Is empty so the filtration system can be switched off. Filling the pool only when you want to use it drastically reduces the maintenance cost

    • @actiglow
      @actiglow 6 ปีที่แล้ว +33

      @@Genius_at_Work There's no filtration, just fill it with fresh seawater and empty it when done. If it's dirty, send someone to clean it (probably a cadet). The weight of water in the pool would at no point be taken into consideration. I mean, they carry 10000tons of fuel :D

  • @zoidburg2975
    @zoidburg2975 7 ปีที่แล้ว +186

    Did they call that TV a cinema?! LOL

    • @adityagupta4040
      @adityagupta4040 7 ปีที่แล้ว +23

      its because seafarers usually watch movies as there is no dish tv ....thus cinema

    • @johnydubz
      @johnydubz 6 ปีที่แล้ว

      😂😂😂😂😩

    • @NibblesTheNibbler
      @NibblesTheNibbler 4 ปีที่แล้ว +2

      I think Europeans say "cinema" where Americans say "watching a movie," in reference to watching on their TV. When we (Americans) use "cinema" we are usually referring to seeing a movie at the movie theater.

  • @BassGuitarGuy128
    @BassGuitarGuy128 6 ปีที่แล้ว +192

    $190 million sounds unusually inexpensive for something this massive. The Airbus A380 by comparison is close to $450 million.

    • @stanpatterson5033
      @stanpatterson5033 6 ปีที่แล้ว +104

      Yes, and an Airbutz A380 goes more than 10 times the speed, is made up of millions of wires, has 4 critical propulsion systems, and its primary purpose is the safe carriage of human beings.
      On a ship, human beings are the secondary concern, the cargo is the primary reason for its being. If the propulsion engine conks out, it can remain afloat for an indefinite period, or even be towed by another vessel.
      A ship can be left unsailed for a long period of time, and relatively quickly be returned to service. An A380 that has not flown in a long period of time would need a complete airworthiness certification prior to returning to service. Very, very complex piece of technology.
      Not to say that a container vessel isn't also complex, but I would compare a sailing vessel to an aircraft like I would compare a mechanic to a surgeon. They can both do similar things, but on a greatly differing level.

    • @Genius_at_Work
      @Genius_at_Work 6 ปีที่แล้ว +27

      Stan Patterson Not to forget the certifications which are a much longer process for aircraft than for ships. Furthermore a ship might be massive but most of it simply is steel without anything behind it.

    • @lorddingleberryhandpump7461
      @lorddingleberryhandpump7461 6 ปีที่แล้ว +5

      The certifications also cost millions . For example an Boeing Instrument Landing System certification ( ILS ) costs 1 million USD and that's just from Boeing other authorities also gave to approve .

    • @dmcnamara9859
      @dmcnamara9859 6 ปีที่แล้ว +10

      BassGuitarGuy128:
      In case you did not know....planes rarely 99.9% of the time sell for the "Suggested Retail Price" Most Commercial aircraft sell 1/4 to 1/3 List Price. A380....when launched, could be had for less than 100 Million. Current Transaction Prices for the 767 Freighter and Passenger A330 is around $70 Million.Outgoing 777 Classic in 200-300 configurations is 100-120 Million. 747-8 Freighter finalize around $150 Million. A350s close around $100 Million. Embraer E-jets finalize in the mid Teens....and the Trusty 737/A320 Series can be had for the low $20 Millions if purchased in modest/large quantity.
      A product is only worth/sold for what a consumer believes it to be worth beyond actual costs to make it....many cases; a consumer product such as Commercial Aircraft are sold at loss when R&D/Production costs soar beyond control....as has been the case for the A380.... a plane (by large consensus) few Carriers want to begin with beyond the Arabs....where free fuel is their folded hand.

    • @LOLHAMMER45678
      @LOLHAMMER45678 4 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      Steel is cheap

  • @iyquc
    @iyquc 10 ปีที่แล้ว +48

    Simply fascinating.

  • @Bkarla123
    @Bkarla123 5 ปีที่แล้ว +8

    I got to visit Maersk vessel last month and it's so wonderful indeed! I'm proud to be part of the Maersk family

  • @commonsense31
    @commonsense31 5 ปีที่แล้ว +8

    I had luckily been able to get my hand on a ticket when the first triple E got delivered. As Mærsk is a Danish Company they Got special permission from the Government to open it up for the public for 4 days, because basically nothing else will come in and out of the harbor for 4 days!
    All the tour tickets was gone in around 25 minutes for all 4 days!
    It’s absolutely mind blowing to see it in reality, like you are thinking this can’t be real!
    I have never experienced anything like it, and the tour took 2-3 hours.
    It made the harbor look like LEGO in comparison.
    If you ever get the chance to get onboard a ship like this do it!
    It was amazing

  • @tomp7847
    @tomp7847 4 ปีที่แล้ว +4

    Getting a pilot airlifted in is the coolest thing ever

  • @OCEANCRAFTSMotionGallery
    @OCEANCRAFTSMotionGallery 4 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    Enjoyed the story and footage of this film very much👍👍👍

  • @antemeridiemwolf
    @antemeridiemwolf 10 ปีที่แล้ว +105

    A great look behind the scenes. By the way, your sound mix is off -- voices too quiet, music too loud.

    • @JSBPisgah
      @JSBPisgah 4 ปีที่แล้ว

      The NYT does it this way on every video. They think it's artsy.

  • @DerpEye
    @DerpEye 5 ปีที่แล้ว +5

    In a zombie apocalypse scenario, imagine transforming this in a floating city. I could carry enough food to support hundreds of people for months, or maybe years.

    • @TheStig_TG
      @TheStig_TG 4 ปีที่แล้ว

      DerpEye Dam , your strong

  • @RoIIingStoned
    @RoIIingStoned 10 ปีที่แล้ว +7

    Interesting. Amazing how small the crew is

    • @Sc0tt69
      @Sc0tt69 6 ปีที่แล้ว +5

      Yeah, but that one guy is bulking up.

    • @edthe2nd
      @edthe2nd 6 ปีที่แล้ว

      Haha, I see what you did there

    • @dangiltenajeros5885
      @dangiltenajeros5885 5 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      We are mostly overworked there, working 13 hours including 2 hours for breaks and meals ( 30 mins each for lunch and dinner).
      The ratings only have 5 months contract but it feels reaaaaaly long when teamed up with some "company men" officers.

    • @johnlawrence2757
      @johnlawrence2757 4 ปีที่แล้ว

      Dangil Tenajeros it said 4 hours on, eight off on the commentary ?

  • @joories
    @joories 10 ปีที่แล้ว +121

    Do you speak metric?

    • @britamericaball2505
      @britamericaball2505 6 ปีที่แล้ว +5

      joories no, Imperial

    • @TRPGpilot
      @TRPGpilot 6 ปีที่แล้ว +2

      metric units required

    • @Apollo-gp5vm
      @Apollo-gp5vm 6 ปีที่แล้ว +2

      technically speaking, the american system is metric

    • @sewing2165
      @sewing2165 4 ปีที่แล้ว

      About 3 1/4 feet per metre. 1300 ft will be around 430m

    • @leoaksil4085
      @leoaksil4085 4 ปีที่แล้ว

      Nautical miles and imperial feet .

  • @LANDSEAAIRCANADA
    @LANDSEAAIRCANADA 6 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    Excellent work NYT

  • @arielabc6589
    @arielabc6589 5 ปีที่แล้ว

    Thank you captain ang your crew for this

  • @TotalRookie_LV
    @TotalRookie_LV 7 ปีที่แล้ว +37

    Compared to the price of a small modern military aircraft (and most military stuff as a whole) this giant ship seems dirty cheap.
    So either those ships are really well thought out from economic perspective, or the armaments are sold at a _little extra._

    • @stoutyyyy
      @stoutyyyy 7 ปีที่แล้ว +19

      TotalRookie_LV it’s a fact of the nature of the construction. Maersk is vertically integrated, they have their own shipyards, while the Navy buys from contractors who sell at a substantial markup. Also, sophisticated weapons systems are fairly expensive, and then there’s good old bureaucratic corruption.

    • @ttrieds8023
      @ttrieds8023 6 ปีที่แล้ว +2

      Stephen M. Stouter i think maersk doesnt have their own shipyard. Most of their ship build by south korean shipyard. (Sorry for my english)

    • @carstenhansen5757
      @carstenhansen5757 6 ปีที่แล้ว

      True. They used to build them in Denmark, but now a days, they get them build in Korea.

    • @lorddingleberryhandpump7461
      @lorddingleberryhandpump7461 6 ปีที่แล้ว

      Most of these ships don't need new high tech systems , GPS navigation and an efficient propulsion system . Aircraft get developed from scratch and especially millitary aircraft get more advanced and constantly get new stuff added into their development thus making them more expensive . Container ships have one job but for example the F-35 is supposed to be a VTOL , ground attacker , Intercepter , fleet defender and a stealth aircraft at the same time and all of these roles actually contradict themselves .

  • @johnleach7879
    @johnleach7879 3 ปีที่แล้ว

    You forgot ping pong, a favorite amoung asian crewmembers.

  • @9aasheesh
    @9aasheesh 2 ปีที่แล้ว

    So lucky I left this company 😊

  • @laur-unstagenameactuallyca1587
    @laur-unstagenameactuallyca1587 5 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    it's so... beautiful...

  • @adamw9672
    @adamw9672 6 ปีที่แล้ว +35

    We’re always supposed to know how tall a famous building is to compare to something. “It’s as tall as the Empire State Building” means nothing to me. I’ve never seen the Empire State Building in person.

    • @bzdtemp
      @bzdtemp 6 ปีที่แล้ว +4

      Well, lots of people have and it is a well know tall building + remember this is a US show.
      More irrelevant is the comparison with the amount of steel used to make the Eiffel Tower. Well know tower, but not many know the amount of steel used.

    • @KingLouis420th
      @KingLouis420th 5 ปีที่แล้ว

      Buy a road meter and drive it then on the freeway or something

    • @jb76489
      @jb76489 5 ปีที่แล้ว

      Adam W “I feel uncomfortable when we are not about me”

    • @counterstrike1110
      @counterstrike1110 4 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      it's one of the most well-known buildings in the entire world. You'd have a point if they compared it to some random office tower in Detroit that know one knows.

    • @zapfanzapfan
      @zapfanzapfan 3 ปีที่แล้ว

      It's the New York Times, of course they compare to something in New York...

  • @jeraldirisary8053
    @jeraldirisary8053 3 ปีที่แล้ว

    Maersk Mc-Kinney Møller (flagship)
    Majestic Maersk
    Mayview Maersk
    Marie Maersk
    Marit Maersk
    Matz Maersk
    Margrethe Maersk
    Mathilde Maersk
    Magleby Maersk
    Mogens Maersk
    Morten Maersk
    Munkebo Maersk
    Maribo Maersk
    Marchen Maersk
    Some familiar names I remember with the EEE Class of Maersk Line.

  • @AeeroXOG
    @AeeroXOG 6 ปีที่แล้ว +2

    Wish this video was longer

  • @ianwhyte826
    @ianwhyte826 6 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    Worked for Safmarine as engineer officer ...............long time ago !

  • @rifham
    @rifham 5 ปีที่แล้ว +2

    I see those Maersk containers on trains passing through my neihborhood which is in Indiana ,long trip.

    • @ilyasali9338
      @ilyasali9338 5 ปีที่แล้ว

      rifham I live in Indianapolis

  • @archismanmajumdar215
    @archismanmajumdar215 6 ปีที่แล้ว +4

    190 million dollars each so...either one of these or a superyacht

  • @Howdy699
    @Howdy699 7 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    Incredible

  • @paulthompson2374
    @paulthompson2374 4 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    Looks like a great place for Mel Gibson to fight a South African.

  • @CarlosPacheco
    @CarlosPacheco 10 ปีที่แล้ว +8

    did he really say 'wessel' ? awesome!

    • @apexxxx10
      @apexxxx10 7 ปีที่แล้ว

      Carlos Pacheco ... my wife calls it “weasel “

    • @Sjsjsjshsn
      @Sjsjsjshsn 6 ปีที่แล้ว

      Carlos Pacheco vessel

    • @zapfanzapfan
      @zapfanzapfan 6 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      Not "nuclear wessel" though :-)

  • @darkfangulas
    @darkfangulas 6 ปีที่แล้ว

    Me: "i just want a simple, thoughtful wedding nothing to spectacular"
    Me arriving on my wedding day: 5:00

  • @uttaradit2
    @uttaradit2 5 ปีที่แล้ว

    excellent

  • @9aasheesh
    @9aasheesh 2 ปีที่แล้ว

    RKCS and MISE flopped in Maersk India in 2001 . Managers did not know what was happening 😁😁

  • @poly_hexamethyl
    @poly_hexamethyl 5 ปีที่แล้ว

    0:46 Are the containers just held down by their weight, or are they somehow attached to one another to keep them secure?

    • @aleksandrzakharov9288
      @aleksandrzakharov9288 5 ปีที่แล้ว +4

      In fact there 4 turnlocks are put to the base of the container when they stack it onto other one. The lowest line of containers is secured by rods.

  • @nileshrajput986
    @nileshrajput986 6 ปีที่แล้ว +2

    How many trips does it make in an year?

    • @andersk7755
      @andersk7755 4 ปีที่แล้ว

      1 trip is 12 weeks.

  • @fricc6982
    @fricc6982 5 ปีที่แล้ว +2

    Looks cool and all but working on those sucks

    • @jeffreygarcia145
      @jeffreygarcia145 3 ปีที่แล้ว

      I worked on a container ship before with a lot of reefers, worst days in my career less sleep and working extended time period, not to mention we berth at 15 ports a month.

  • @dwellspompano
    @dwellspompano 6 ปีที่แล้ว

    Wow!

  • @joanskedge9223
    @joanskedge9223 4 ปีที่แล้ว

    Where in England is it at the moment

  • @michaelherr5027
    @michaelherr5027 7 ปีที่แล้ว

    I need to get uncoated containers fabricated. Can you suggest a company that provides this service?

    • @jameslouise6884
      @jameslouise6884 7 ปีที่แล้ว

      Medi-RayTM fabricates uncoated containers and products which can be assembled into plastic or metal interior and exterior shells or forms. Custom pouring of lead into a customer supplied form is accommodated with shipment back to the customer within 24 hours.
      Read more: www.mediray.com/product_category/product/shipping_containers/uncoated_container

  • @torgeirbrandsnes1916
    @torgeirbrandsnes1916 5 ปีที่แล้ว +2

    Pr hour I bet the helicopter is more expensive to operate than the ship.

    • @rustteze
      @rustteze 5 ปีที่แล้ว

      It burns 250k $ worth of fuel an hour...just for propulsion.....you don't know for generators, lights , crew cost , bunkering costs, ...more than 300k+ an hour

  • @flytheskies7232
    @flytheskies7232 6 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    Ship seems kinda empty

  • @danjohansen1002
    @danjohansen1002 5 ปีที่แล้ว

    The New York Slime

  • @nubiareal1868
    @nubiareal1868 3 ปีที่แล้ว

    Gostaria muito de poder conhecer voce a tua luz brilha

  • @hephaestus198
    @hephaestus198 6 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    I understand the food is excellent, and abundant
    they deserve it
    anyone knows ?

  • @DNOJ
    @DNOJ 5 ปีที่แล้ว

    Nuclear powered Submarines...

  • @mike_Yeetbaby
    @mike_Yeetbaby 6 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    Triple E

  • @VascoTheSauce
    @VascoTheSauce 10 ปีที่แล้ว

    Does anyone know how many years it takes to break-even for ship this size?

    • @krababz
      @krababz 7 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      not that long, cause it's build in some 3rd world asian country.

    • @norbertschmitz3358
      @norbertschmitz3358 6 ปีที่แล้ว

      bit of luck....less than 2 years.
      The first supertankers during the early 70is paid for themselves on the very first voyage.

    • @Genius_at_Work
      @Genius_at_Work 6 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      Norbert Schmitz These days are over. Since 2007 the shipping industry is facing a massive crisis dropping the freight rates at such a low level that they barely cover the running costs. For that reason the vessel size exploded since then.
      And the Triple E Class is built in South Korea which isn't exactly Third World.

    • @johnlawrence2757
      @johnlawrence2757 4 ปีที่แล้ว

      I think the commentary says it often doesn’t operate at full capacity due to some ports font have the ability to fully load a ship that size

    • @johnlawrence2757
      @johnlawrence2757 4 ปีที่แล้ว

      I think the commentary says it often doesn’t operate at full capacity due to some ports dont have the ability to fully load a ship that size

  • @tomj8337
    @tomj8337 5 ปีที่แล้ว

    Holy crap 100 tons of fuel a day

    • @gymrvg858
      @gymrvg858 5 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      Thats more than 10kg per second. About 70kg per minute.

    • @7seaslp
      @7seaslp 5 ปีที่แล้ว

      @@gymrvg858 *More than 1kg every Second, not more than 10kg.

  • @stevieburrows3953
    @stevieburrows3953 5 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    Great news for England leaving the united states of europe and trading more with the world which is the right thing to do

  • @micanpu
    @micanpu 5 ปีที่แล้ว

    I want know about TUES AND GRT, NRT PL.

  • @matt2483
    @matt2483 6 ปีที่แล้ว

    Please fire who ever did the audio for this video

  • @J38x729
    @J38x729 5 ปีที่แล้ว

    track balls

  • @reynoldfrancis6060
    @reynoldfrancis6060 3 ปีที่แล้ว

    It's no longer the largest

  • @fabiolaiiludwigvonhoffenhe2264
    @fabiolaiiludwigvonhoffenhe2264 6 ปีที่แล้ว +2

    Brazil has been humiliated by German again. LMAO

  • @haggencharman
    @haggencharman 6 ปีที่แล้ว

    Is this 20,000++ TEUs vessel?

    • @Genius_at_Work
      @Genius_at_Work 6 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      Haggen Charman About 18000. But Maersk slightly improved the design so the second generation of the Triple E class can carry over 20000 containers.

  • @giniolamy
    @giniolamy 5 ปีที่แล้ว

    When do they have time to be with their Family

    • @laurenmaxell5917
      @laurenmaxell5917 5 ปีที่แล้ว

      They aren't on board all the time. Usually they don't work more than three months in one go. And then they are home for a couple of weeks or months, depends on how long they have been on board.
      There are a few exceptions though
      One of them is intern which stay on board for 2×6 months (i will be doing this) or 12 months in one go and some people from the phillipines that work on deck stay for up to nine months. This is because they only go once and that way they earn (for them) a lot of money which can provide them for a long time.

  • @Derpster2493
    @Derpster2493 6 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    Ships this big should have backup nuclear reactor in case the diesel engine fails.

    • @mirkokvesic1598
      @mirkokvesic1598 6 ปีที่แล้ว +2

      Every ship this big should have a Nuclear propulsion system. They are perfect for it.

    • @dstblj5222
      @dstblj5222 5 ปีที่แล้ว +2

      @@mirkokvesic1598 No they require a huge crew to operate and those cost considerably more then the fuel they would save.

    • @jeffreygarcia145
      @jeffreygarcia145 3 ปีที่แล้ว

      Heavy fuels engines are cheaper than nuclear machinery.

  • @fazbomjardim
    @fazbomjardim 6 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    7x1 foi pouco

  • @jameskohls1168
    @jameskohls1168 10 ปีที่แล้ว +13

    Its pretty funny how random people jump on the hip wanting to go too america

    • @Danieloncarevic
      @Danieloncarevic 10 ปีที่แล้ว +5

      I assure you that it's not funny at all for the crew working on those ships.

    • @jameskohls1168
      @jameskohls1168 10 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      I was not referring to the crew, just everyone else.

    • @zapfanzapfan
      @zapfanzapfan 6 ปีที่แล้ว

      Not random people, migrants. Calais in France had huge problems.

  • @prodigalretrod
    @prodigalretrod 7 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    22 containers wide x 24 containers long x 10 containers high = 5280 containers. So where does the 18000 number come from?

    • @vermeilanimation3706
      @vermeilanimation3706 7 ปีที่แล้ว

      There's more container under the bridge (I think)

    • @prodigalretrod
      @prodigalretrod 7 ปีที่แล้ว

      Then there would still need to be 2.5x more containers hiding under the bridge than those that are visible. I don't doubt that it can hold 18000, but I really don't get how.

    • @monster6488
      @monster6488 7 ปีที่แล้ว +4

      It can fit ~ 18.000 TEU container (Twenty foot long containers). However, you normally have containers twice the size (also reffered as FEU - Forty-foot Equivalent Unit). In the video you can see mostly FEU containers. However at 1:25 in the harbour you can also see a few smaller TEU containers.
      The capacity of container ships is always given in TEU so that explains where the ~18.000 containers come from

    • @prodigalretrod
      @prodigalretrod 7 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      Aah I see. Ok so that means I can account for about 11,000 TEU capacity based on the shots in the video, and then maybe there are more below deck or something.

    • @monster6488
      @monster6488 7 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      My guess is that the "10 containers high" from the video is not actually the max the ship can carry. I think they were only able to staple 10 containers onto each other because of a bridge or heavy wind or something and that the max height is actually more that that.

  • @ryangriggs5767
    @ryangriggs5767 5 ปีที่แล้ว

    Why don't they do nuclear power, like the largest subs? Wouldn't this save a lot of fuel cost?

    • @Rensjerens
      @Rensjerens 5 ปีที่แล้ว

      If it did save money they would've already used that kind of technology

    • @javedsultan4830
      @javedsultan4830 5 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      what if it explodes like a nuclear bomb.. all your xboxes, smart phones, beds, furniture, from china gone with the wind

    • @darklord1134
      @darklord1134 5 ปีที่แล้ว

      Fuel oil for ships is very cheap.

  • @fresco8866
    @fresco8866 5 ปีที่แล้ว

    Ставь лайк если ты с KSMA

  • @stevedowdeswell139
    @stevedowdeswell139 4 ปีที่แล้ว

    Music is dreadful. Like a silly pulse. Made the video unwatchable.

  • @_Shefarer_
    @_Shefarer_ 6 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    :-( Waiting in vain for a glimpse of my father

  • @Allan-qx3ev
    @Allan-qx3ev 9 ปีที่แล้ว +4

    I have heard that China has made a contaner ship that is one meter longer than this Danish contaner ship Emma ... I do not know what the ship is called but it is now the world's longest contaner ship one meter longer than the Danish ship called Emma...

    • @jacobnleth
      @jacobnleth 8 ปีที่แล้ว

      Probably less fuel efficient though

    • @NilsHedstrom
      @NilsHedstrom 8 ปีที่แล้ว +6

      Sorry but as a Maritime enthusiast i have to correct you there, this is the Mary Mærsk wich is in the triple-e series wich is 399m long. Thats 2 meters longer than the Emma Mærsk and have a different Bridge design than Emma, right now the Mærsk triple-e series and some MSC container ships holds the record of being the worlds biggest container ships(399) meters but the altime biggest ship was "Jahre Viking"(Sje was renamed sebran times to "Seawise giant", Knock Nevis and a few other names) with it's 458 meters of hull but sadly that beauty was scrapped

    • @nikiol123321
      @nikiol123321 7 ปีที่แล้ว

      Many ships is bigger than Emma, but the newest triple e ship, Madrid Maersk, is currently the worlds biggest. When you measure in the amount of cargo being transported and not in actual size :)

    • @lygtemanden
      @lygtemanden 7 ปีที่แล้ว

      Madrid Maersk was only the biggest for one month, the biggest now is OOCL Hong Kong

    • @17industries42
      @17industries42 7 ปีที่แล้ว

      Current biggest ship is the OOCL Hong Kong at ~21,400 teu

  • @luminescentlion
    @luminescentlion 6 ปีที่แล้ว

    what a small ship

  • @jacquesblaque7728
    @jacquesblaque7728 6 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    Just FYI, a merchant ship has a "master". A warship has a "captain". Might seem subtle, but BIG difference legally in many ways.

    • @jjs8046
      @jjs8046 6 ปีที่แล้ว

      Jacques Blaque B. S.

    • @stanpatterson5033
      @stanpatterson5033 6 ปีที่แล้ว +3

      You don't go around addressing the man in charge as "Master" even though that's his technical title. I drive a truck, and when I cross a border, I'm the master of the vessel, but it's not a title I carry. The person-in-charge above all others on a sailing vessel is addressed as Captain.

    • @johnhighway9397
      @johnhighway9397 5 ปีที่แล้ว

      In many countries there is no such term as "master", only Captain.

  • @kusinaph4479
    @kusinaph4479 7 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    😳😁👏🏻🍾

  • @jacquesblaque7728
    @jacquesblaque7728 7 ปีที่แล้ว +3

    Strictly speaking, a merchant ship does not have a "captain", rather a "master". FYI

    • @arthursleep7261
      @arthursleep7261 6 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      That may be so but there's a reason they call me captain haddock and not master haddock

    • @_Shefarer_
      @_Shefarer_ 6 ปีที่แล้ว

      It depends on the size of the vessel

  • @Lochaby
    @Lochaby 6 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    Wait i thought you guys hated capitalism...

    • @commonsense31
      @commonsense31 6 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      Lochaby nah we have a major social security net that helps people to get on top again, if you catch people before they crash they return faster to become productive citizens and happy citizens

  • @RaviPatel0223
    @RaviPatel0223 6 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    That ship is a waste of money. Not even half of the container spots were filled...

    • @jjs8046
      @jjs8046 6 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      RaviWay Inc. Get life.

    • @Genius_at_Work
      @Genius_at_Work 6 ปีที่แล้ว +2

      RaviWay Inc. Because the load capacity of a container vessel is not only made by the number of containers but also their weight.

    • @Genius_at_Work
      @Genius_at_Work 6 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      RaviWay Inc. Or to be more precise and a lot less simple:
      The improved Triple E Class has 20586 TEU (twenty foot equivalent unit) and 200600 DWT (deadweight tons). So assuming there is no fuel, spare parts, provision etc. each container could only weight about ten tons while the average mass used in calculations is 18 tons per forty foot container. Hence that's twice the weight minus 10% of my "calculation" for 20 ft containers and two of them can be replaced by one 40 footer the weight of 10293 of them fits the 2006000 tons with a couple of tons for provision and spares and a couple of thousand tons for fuel. And a joke weight for the crew.
      Btw. that answer was to fit the "Get a life" point. If you read all of it you have way to much time.

    • @jjs8046
      @jjs8046 6 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      Der Bleifuss yet, he will not understand.

    • @Genius_at_Work
      @Genius_at_Work 6 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      JJ S That's why I put a simple and a detailed answer.