Comparing Amelia Earhart to Taylor Swift is an insult, beyond all insults. Who ever said that made a grevious error. Amelia way on top, and Taylor somewhere down, far below.
These ppl are crazy, Amelia risked her life Everytime she set records, her fame came from actual stunts, not dancing on stage gimme a break, how this country has fallen
@@shable1436I have that photograph of that event, a Tribune photographer took the picture and was published in the newspaper, my wife obtained copies of it. Glad to send a copy.
It's sad to see Amelia Earhart's flight end the way it did. She was such a talented and gifted aviator. In 1964, my ship was patrolling the Caroline Island group south of Guam. As we patrolled, we received a radio call from a woman flying an attempt to recreate Amelia's flight. That was a bit sobering to think back on these tragic events.
To say that you've located her plane based on these sonar images is ludicrous. While I agree that they merit further investigation, there are thousands of aircraft on the floor of the western Pacific. I hope he's right.
Taylor Swift being compared to Amelia 😂😂😂 I'm sure Amelia didn't date losers after loser and then make a career off of breaking up with them. I'm sure Amelia didn't use her body sexually to advance in her field of expertise. I'm sure Amelia's awards were earned through actual hard work and dedication to somehting that can change the world. Only one of these women changed HISTORY!
To me the sunken aircraft looks like a swept-wing jet, maybe an F-86 Sabre. The Earhart hunter needs to rent a deep sea drone, which I think "only" cost about $1,500/wk. He should have done that before making his announcement.
Nothing to really go that far down. We have unmanned vehicles but they need to be attached by cable, and it's supposed to be deeper than the titanic. That's a lot of cable and a lot of money.
@AliasTekTV the Japanese have a submersible that goes 10.9k meters which is 35k feet. That's more than twice the depth of what they are saying the "plane" is at.
imagine getting your panties in a twist over a singer because your ego is sooo fragile. he was comparing fame, don't be dumb. y'all love to hate on successful women, it's shameful.
This is puzzling because there was fairly compelling evidence found on Nikumaroro island 400 miles south. Makeup jars and bottles and bones suggests that someone was there trying to survive-maybe on crabs.
It was/is an interesting and hopeful theory, but from the jump TIGAR's "evidence" was overstated. Once you really look critically at what they've managed to come away with after *seven* separate, lengthy expeditions to the island, it becomes relatively evident that it has no basis in reality. I have no dog in the fight other than to say I hope her demise was swift, I simply cannot accept something for which there's really 0 evidence, unfortunately. Like so many famous cases with devotees, it appears as though TIGAR simply could not budge at all from their hypothesis. Whereas a lack of any evidence would make a scientific mind eventually form new theories, TIGAR got caught in that all-too familiar trap of transitioning from legitimate fact-finding missions to ramped up, heat-seeling confirmation bias parades wherein a fundamental lack of any evidence actually paradoxically (arrogantly) finds the researcher biting down on the rubber mouthpiece and doubling -down even harder, becoming even more averse to any contradicting information to the point they're actually out there covertly trying to shut down dissent by their responses when questioned about other search efforts. -the woman's shoe...a key piece of TIGAR's evidence, which was purportedly located back in the 1980s and is still inexplicably mentioned by every press outlet, was never actually produced by anyone. -the "make up jars" were actually a few bottles in a fire pit which appears to be from the 1920s and are not able to be definitively verified as having come from any specific western country. -the "freckle cream" jar may actually be just that, but it's far from definitive and besides...so what? -Piece her aircraft was eliminated by river pattern analysis 20+ years ago, but was then definitively proven as having come from a plane crash on a nearby island. -the bones of a purported castaway recovered in the 1940s were at that time demonstrated as having definitely belonged to a shorter, 5'6 inch male, but were then likely discarded. -the Noonan sextant box turned out to definitely not be Noonan's after all. So there ya have it. All the convincing evidence of her having been on Nikimururo. I won't even touch on the radio signals, as it is very normal for unsubstantiated rumors like the radio signals to crop up in the wake of an international tragedy or mystery.
"for some reason they land right-side up", really? That's how they're designed. It's not a mystery. It's a frigging plane. If the wings are attached, it's going to land right-side up. The only mystery is; how can anyone that knows anything about planes not understand something so simple? You need to go play in a swimming pool with model planes.
The airplane in the sonar image has swept back wings. Amelia Earhart's Electra did not. I don't think it would be due to the plane breaking up during the crash, as both wings in the image appear to be symmetrical. I also doubt that it is just a distortion in the sonar image - as again - the swept-back angle is symmetrical as well. I highly doubt that this is her plane.
It Appears that way, but the distortion and whatever damage the plane suffered could make it look that way.. only way to really know it to view it up close... Also, that thing right beside it appears to be possible an engine..
@@TheFarmerfitz You may be correct. The only way to know for sure is to get down there with an RV and take pictures. Until then, I’m sticking with my belief that this is not her aircraft. I continue to believe that the Nikamaroro theory is the one that is most likely correct.
Agreed, delta wings weren't in the aircraft design. Great bit of advertising for the company tho. They can never retrieve it, so can neither be proved or disproved
Almost all aircraft even back then had the parts with serial numbers on them that were matched to the aircraft in their maintenance logs. By bringing the parts up and finding serial numbers on them would help identify the aircraft. And I am guessing due to the popularity of the story all the documentation from the aircraft would have been saved from the maintenance facilities that the aircraft was worked on.
As I have been saying for almost 10 years, MH370 will never be found because it was jacked to the 25th dimension by beings from there that collect people and stuff from all over the universe & all time!!!!!! ENOUGH ALREADY!!!!
I don't think they found her plane. Look at the image, the wings are swept back like a modern fighter jet. The wings on her electra are not swept backward, the leading edge is pretty much straight out to the side. You can easily see the difference between them.
I would assume he has more evidence than he’s letting known. I’m sure he has studied her plane and the images he has before claiming he has found it and going to the media. Just my opinion. I’m not saying it’s definitely her plane but would be kind of dumb of him to just find an image and assume it’s her without really looking deeper at the whole thing including the wings.
As I have been saying for almost 10 years, MH370 will never be found because it was jacked to the 25th dimension by beings from there that collect people and stuff from all over the universe & all time!!!!!! ENOUGH ALREADY!!!!
sure... but that is a very specific looking plane, especially the tail! whatever it is, it sure looks very similar to that plane, so why not have a look?
There wouldn’t be any Japanese or US planes from WW2 in that area, he says! That is a ridiculous statement!! Makes me question his credentials??!! They have found things from WW2 in places all over them weren’t expected! Until they send an ROV down to look at it it’s still just speculation!! Also just because the plane is there doesn’t mean she and her copilot navigator didn’t get out and make it to the island!
Special ops burned it in 1944.... No one could ever find any pieces left over from that fire. I'm not surprised that they found skeletal remains basically of the plane. What we should be asking is why did the military get rid of it and how did the military find it?
Her plane went down near Noriti Island. Where the ocean goes in and out of the coral reef bay. Her bones were found at the southern edge of the island, reef, or atoll.
This is one of the most anticipated finds of 2024 that could even compare to a dinosaur fossile. I hope she didn't suffer being hurt in the frigid cold water alone.
Frigid? Alone? Um, no. Just no. Where do you think she was, the arctic? No, honey the South Pacific. And her longtime navigator, Fred Noonan was with her. Hello!
Here is why I'm doubtful right now: You have a target, but you only make one pass, one image of it. Never supply a moving video of the target, which would by necessity exist. What proof did they provide of anything else their company found, or did "of note" This seems like a search, not for a plane, but for money. All this hype over 1 photo. No thought to provide absolutely anything else they did there. Not even footage of them on the island. Nothing.
Having a "story" about the image makes it easier to find financial supporters if you find something that "might" be her plane. I hope it is her plane, and I look forward to his next visit to the site.
Send a drilling rig ROV to take video & pics the technology is there. remember the Gulf of Mexico 2010 accident, there was a ROV live streaming the oil spill from 2 miles deep.
Why? The point was that she was as popular a figure then as Taylor Swift is now, and that's true. Calling her "Lady Lindy" is much more annoying. She didn't need her identity mixed in with Lindbergh's to have legitimacy.
Good God don't compare Emilia Earhart to Taylor Swift in anyway please.One was an American pioneer and legend. The other is a entertainer and publicity hound.
Just one more possible theory. If it is? It definitely ends all other theories. But it will need physical confirmation. Only one way to do that. Have to go look somehow.
At 6:10 they have the suspected crash site dead west of Howland Island. You know that's off. It'll be north of Howland and most likely east east of the island.
If she was hitting headwinds she would have been low on fuel sooner and also would have been west of the island had she gone down. If she was North or east of Howland that would have required more fuel. Remember he based their location on the strength of the radio signal. I would be curious to know what the range of the signal strength would be before making different assumptions.
I doubt very seriously this is Amelia's plane. When you look at the diagram of it, versus the sonar image, IF it's a plane at all the wings are angled more like a jet of some kind. Beyond that I don't see how you can say it's hers and not a plane of similar size. I fully admit I'm no expert, and I could be wrong, but I just don't see it. I think it's a lot of wishful thinking.
Why not say possibly her plane in title that’s not much proof just a sonar image if you had a underwater sonar why not have a underwater ROV to verify your finds
... you probably gonna find a ditched, empty plane while she still alive and living la vida loca at 100+ years old, full of grandkids with the native men of a near by island and laughing at this interview 😀🏝️🏝️🏝️
I seriously doubt that her plane is lying intact at the bottom of the sea. It is more likely that they bailed out and the plane crashed down because attempting a soft unpowered landing on water would be too risky. 🤔
"too risky"... really? 😂 and bailing out in the middle of nowhere over open ocean with about as close to zero chance of ever being found as you can get, is not too risky? maybe im wrong, but would they not have some sort of liferaft onboard? or maybe inflatable rafts were not a thing yet... either way, i do not think i would bail in that situation! id rather it all end on impact, but survival instinct would likely kick in and i would try to land it anyway. there really is no good option, but bailing would also mean a good chance of being separated too... and there you are all alone in the water just waiting for the inevitable.
@@ralphbooger4756 Parachutes yes. Life Raft very unlikely due to weight. They were on an ultra long distance mission. More weight onboard would consume more fuel. Pilots train for just such emergencies. Many pilots in WW2 bailed out. You obviously know nothing about planes and crew emergencies. Why would you post? We do not care what you "think" you would do...an unpowered water landing is an extremely difficult maneuver, and the chances are great for a complete breakup upon impact.
tootsie toy at 2 feet until you show us the real deal..hope it is but......... Air Force Major Joseph Gervais was a expert on the matter also and said Amelia was alive under an assumed name of Irene Bolam ...funny he didnt mention that being an Air Force guy ...Elgin Long said he knew whwere it was..16000 feet down off Howland
everyone thinks they know everything we dont know how much damage her pland had so i think ill wait on better solar mybe it is mybe isnt qe dont know rt noq...its just a image
Well you are VERY late with that! famously loved and disappeared? such a woman should be sponsored again, with statue and all, but she has been forgotten? So she wasn't that important after all! (It's a shame that she hasn't been properly looked for before!)
Deep Sea Vision, the Romeo Brothers, at best have a theory. I wouldn't call in a hypothesis. You don't have many facts. Charles Lindbergh flew non-stop from New York to Paris. Amelia flew non-stop from New Foundland to Iceland. How do you explain the credible radio transmissions on the evening of July 2 through July 5? Why to you discount, discredit the TIGHAR hypothesis?
She wasn’t. There is a photo, that people thought it looked just like them and facial recognition was done and it was like 90-95%, while looking through a travel photo book, the same photo was found and it was dated to be roughly 1935
It's not forgotten at all. It had a search done just as extensive as Amelia's,if not more? But you have to have a point of reference to try and do more searching.
I doubt this is her plane. First, the shape of the dotted imagine looks nothing like her plane. This guy is so sure he found it but he has little to no real evidence that this is it. I didn’t watch this one all the way through but did watch another interview. This man is unprofessional and has little tact. He has blown off other very extensive search results and finds to something as finding nothing more than a broken cosmetic jar. He has nothing to support his claim. Other researchers have hard evidence of things that were found that cannot be explained any other way but to say they point to Amelia. But I guess since he brought back this blurry image that could be a hundred different other kind of airplanes….this must be it. Don’t give this guy credit, applause, or even respect at this point.
@@WALTERBROADDUS the titanic has been sitting 4,000 feet higher than this supposed crash site and it’s made of steel slowly being crushed and worn away by the pressure of the ocean depth and corrosion, the airframe on her plane is deeper than the titanic and considerable more fragile sitting for almost 70 years that we know of why would it still be intact is also had to sink to said depth
Comparing Amelia Earhart to Taylor Swift is an insult, beyond all insults. Who ever said that made a grevious error. Amelia way on top, and Taylor somewhere down, far below.
I agree Taylor Swuft is an insult
Not even an apples and oranges comparison. lol
These ppl are crazy, Amelia risked her life Everytime she set records, her fame came from actual stunts, not dancing on stage gimme a break, how this country has fallen
I Agree Totally!
They're saying she's AS KNOWN as Taylor Swift. Not that she is. Got your panties in a bundle over a singer? 😂
My wife's uncle Walter Grieben gave Ameila Earhart her last haircut before her flight. He had a barbershop in the Oakland Tribune lobby.
My auntie gave her a manicure next door
Wow! That’s amazing!
Damn 😆
@@shable1436I have that photograph of that event, a Tribune photographer took the picture and was published in the newspaper, my wife obtained copies of it. Glad to send a copy.
It's sad to see Amelia Earhart's flight end the way it did. She was such a talented and gifted aviator.
In 1964, my ship was patrolling the Caroline Island group south of Guam. As we patrolled, we received a radio call from a woman flying an attempt to recreate Amelia's flight. That was a bit sobering to think back on these tragic events.
11:17 if you want to skip the history lesson, the patting on the back, and go right to "the find" (what you came here for).
You're welcome
thanks for saving 20 minutes of my day, much appreciated
Thank you 🙂
Not all hero’s wear capes 💪🏻🫵🏻😂💯
Thanks
To say that you've located her plane based on these sonar images is ludicrous. While I agree that they merit further investigation, there are thousands of aircraft on the floor of the western Pacific. I hope he's right.
and as I pointed out in my post, the sonar image doesn't even match the profile.
Yeah the large wings aren’t even the same shape
Taylor Swift being compared to Amelia 😂😂😂 I'm sure Amelia didn't date losers after loser and then make a career off of breaking up with them. I'm sure Amelia didn't use her body sexually to advance in her field of expertise. I'm sure Amelia's awards were earned through actual hard work and dedication to somehting that can change the world. Only one of these women changed HISTORY!
To me the sunken aircraft looks like a swept-wing jet, maybe an F-86 Sabre.
The Earhart hunter needs to rent a deep sea drone, which I think "only" cost about $1,500/wk. He should have done that before making his announcement.
Just send something down to verify.
They are bleeding the hell out of this
Nothing to really go that far down. We have unmanned vehicles but they need to be attached by cable, and it's supposed to be deeper than the titanic. That's a lot of cable and a lot of money.
@AliasTekTV the Japanese have a submersible that goes 10.9k meters which is 35k feet. That's more than twice the depth of what they are saying the "plane" is at.
Meh, maybe leave it a mystery. It's history. It was more fun not knowing. If they're so good at investigating these mysteries how about MH370?
@@AliasTekTVCameras was sent to USS Samuel B Roberts to explore it. She is in 23 thousand feet deep. She is the deepest wreckage ever found.
No
Don't even compare the amazing Amelia Earhart with Taylor Swift.
imagine getting your panties in a twist over a singer because your ego is sooo fragile. he was comparing fame, don't be dumb. y'all love to hate on successful women, it's shameful.
It's absolutely a plane. Just a question of whose.
This is puzzling because there was fairly compelling evidence found on Nikumaroro island 400 miles south. Makeup jars and bottles and bones suggests that someone was there trying to survive-maybe on crabs.
It was/is an interesting and hopeful theory, but from the jump TIGAR's "evidence" was overstated. Once you really look critically at what they've managed to come away with after *seven* separate, lengthy expeditions to the island, it becomes relatively evident that it has no basis in reality. I have no dog in the fight other than to say I hope her demise was swift, I simply cannot accept something for which there's really 0 evidence, unfortunately. Like so many famous cases with devotees, it appears as though TIGAR simply could not budge at all from their hypothesis. Whereas a lack of any evidence would make a scientific mind eventually form new theories, TIGAR got caught in that all-too familiar trap of transitioning from legitimate fact-finding missions to ramped up, heat-seeling confirmation bias parades wherein a fundamental lack of any evidence actually paradoxically (arrogantly) finds the researcher biting down on the rubber mouthpiece and doubling -down even harder, becoming even more averse to any contradicting information to the point they're actually out there covertly trying to shut down dissent by their responses when questioned about other search efforts.
-the woman's shoe...a key piece of TIGAR's evidence, which was purportedly located back in the 1980s and is still inexplicably mentioned by every press outlet, was never actually produced by anyone.
-the "make up jars" were actually a few bottles in a fire pit which appears to be from the 1920s and are not able to be definitively verified as having come from any specific western country.
-the "freckle cream" jar may actually be just that, but it's far from definitive and besides...so what?
-Piece her aircraft was eliminated by river pattern analysis 20+ years ago, but was then definitively proven as having come from a plane crash on a nearby island.
-the bones of a purported castaway recovered in the 1940s were at that time demonstrated as having definitely belonged to a shorter, 5'6 inch male, but were then likely discarded.
-the Noonan sextant box turned out to definitely not be Noonan's after all.
So there ya have it. All the convincing evidence of her having been on Nikimururo. I won't even touch on the radio signals, as it is very normal for unsubstantiated rumors like the radio signals to crop up in the wake of an international tragedy or mystery.
she never could have made it to that iskland ,it is 400 miles south of her last location around Howland islnd and was out of gas.
"for some reason they land right-side up", really? That's how they're designed. It's not a mystery. It's a frigging plane. If the wings are attached, it's going to land right-side up. The only mystery is; how can anyone that knows anything about planes not understand something so simple? You need to go play in a swimming pool with model planes.
The airplane in the sonar image has swept back wings. Amelia Earhart's Electra did not.
I don't think it would be due to the plane breaking up during the crash, as both wings in the image appear to be symmetrical.
I also doubt that it is just a distortion in the sonar image - as again - the swept-back angle is symmetrical as well.
I highly doubt that this is her plane.
Exactly, and also appears to be a single engine aircraft.
It Appears that way, but the distortion and whatever damage the plane suffered could make it look that way.. only way to really know it to view it up close... Also, that thing right beside it appears to be possible an engine..
@@TheFarmerfitz You may be correct. The only way to know for sure is to get down there with an RV and take pictures.
Until then, I’m sticking with my belief that this is not her aircraft.
I continue to believe that the Nikamaroro theory is the one that is most likely correct.
Agreed, delta wings weren't in the aircraft design. Great bit of advertising for the company tho. They can never retrieve it, so can neither be proved or disproved
@@thickus plus I heard that it is deeper than the Titanic is - and it is approx 3 miles deep.
Why would they need to bring it to the surface?
It's not very practical to even try. It's rather doubtful you could even lift anything in one piece.
Almost all aircraft even back then had the parts with serial numbers on them that were matched to the aircraft in their maintenance logs. By bringing the parts up and finding serial numbers on them would help identify the aircraft. And I am guessing due to the popularity of the story all the documentation from the aircraft would have been saved from the maintenance facilities that the aircraft was worked on.
@@davidclemens1578 only if someone did not steal them
@@davidclemens1578 I get that, but if it is her type of plane, I doubt it could be any one other than hers.
Great work! Maybe he can find MH370.
As I have been saying for almost 10 years, MH370 will never be found because it was jacked to the 25th dimension by beings from there that collect people and stuff from all over the universe & all time!!!!!! ENOUGH ALREADY!!!!
A lot of folks have tried.
If it’s not Earhart’s plane, watch TIGHAR will release more crap along with the others trying to make a living off this mystery.
I don't think they found her plane. Look at the image, the wings are swept back like a modern fighter jet. The wings on her electra are not swept backward, the leading edge is pretty much straight out to the side. You can easily see the difference between them.
I would assume he has more evidence than he’s letting known. I’m sure he has studied her plane and the images he has before claiming he has found it and going to the media. Just my opinion. I’m not saying it’s definitely her plane but would be kind of dumb of him to just find an image and assume it’s her without really looking deeper at the whole thing including the wings.
This guy can now turn his attention to MH370. Solve it!
As I have been saying for almost 10 years, MH370 will never be found because it was jacked to the 25th dimension by beings from there that collect people and stuff from all over the universe & all time!!!!!! ENOUGH ALREADY!!!!
You'll have to ask the cia, 😮
@@Bill-yo6kw why would they want a random airplane?
The Indian Ocean is a very big place, with very few landmarks to start from to look. The only known piece washed up off the island of Madagascar.
Time to send down a remote controlled vehicle to get close up photos.
Could be anything.
thats what i keep telling people. It could be a mass of sea trash or some underwater rock formation shaped like a plane
sure... but that is a very specific looking plane, especially the tail!
whatever it is, it sure looks very similar to that plane, so why not have a look?
Any ideas when the next search will be..interesting
Very nicely done episode.
i worked HFDF and i can tell you that you can not use signal strength to determine location, you have to DF using triangulation
Is the left turn signal still on 😂😂😂
There wouldn’t be any Japanese or US planes from WW2 in that area, he says! That is a ridiculous statement!! Makes me question his credentials??!! They have found things from WW2 in places all over them weren’t expected! Until they send an ROV down to look at it it’s still just speculation!! Also just because the plane is there doesn’t mean she and her copilot navigator didn’t get out and make it to the island!
They didn't make it to Howland. There was a US Coast Guard cutter there sending the radio calls.
It could be a Japanese war plane from the battle of midway (yes im a nerd)
The sonar image is not a Lockheed 10.
Special ops burned it in 1944....
No one could ever find any pieces left over from that fire. I'm not surprised that they found skeletal remains basically of the plane.
What we should be asking is why did the military get rid of it and how did the military find it?
Just bought a propane tank and an old Xbox selling tickets for tours starting at 500,000
Her plane went down near Noriti Island. Where the ocean goes in and out of the coral reef bay. Her bones were found at the southern edge of the island, reef, or atoll.
This is one of the most anticipated finds of 2024 that could even compare to a dinosaur fossile. I hope she didn't suffer being hurt in the frigid cold water alone.
She wasn’t alone
Well she died there. Likely suffered. Reality check for you. Still a big find. But how about finding MH370!
Fossil*
@@NinjaRunningWildjust stop
Frigid? Alone? Um, no. Just no. Where do you think she was, the arctic? No, honey the South Pacific. And her longtime navigator, Fred Noonan was with her. Hello!
Bullwinkle the Moose: "Hey Rocky ... watch me pull Amelia Earhart outta my hat".
Rocket J. Squirrel: "A-GAIN??!??! That trick NEVER works".
HA!-HA!--THAT IS SO FUNNY !!--DON'T FORGET"wrong-way-peach-fuzz"-that's running the show !!
Here is why I'm doubtful right now:
You have a target, but you only make one pass, one image of it.
Never supply a moving video of the target, which would by necessity exist.
What proof did they provide of anything else their company found, or did "of note"
This seems like a search, not for a plane, but for money.
All this hype over 1 photo. No thought to provide absolutely anything else they did there. Not even footage of them on the island. Nothing.
Wow this story is 2 months old
2:08 im so confused how Swift gets compared to Earnhart? Like how does her career even compare? That’s more of an insult tbh but maybe im wrong.
1:00 Take two?
Having a "story" about the image makes it easier to find financial supporters if you find something that "might" be her plane. I hope it is her plane, and I look forward to his next visit to the site.
Cannot hear..Captions would be a courtesy.
The way my jaw dropped
The horizontal stabilizer and Lockheed Electra rudder paddles appear to be visible...If so then that's it!...
Maybe..... There are other aircraft with that similar configuration.
Swept wings though
@shable1436 With a split rudder tail?...Only one plane that can be...Time for them to get quick funding for a closer look...
@@Exiles800 Actually, a Lockheed Ventura patrol bomber has the same basic design as the Electra. And could be in those waters in the war.
@@WALTERBROADDUS No record of that...
I bet she hated being called lady lindy
The gardener Island find is her. The evidence is more than enough. Why not go sound around that island?
Send a drilling rig ROV to take video & pics the technology is there. remember the Gulf of Mexico 2010 accident, there was a ROV live streaming the oil spill from 2 miles deep.
The Taylor swift thing is where it went to far for me lmao
Why? The point was that she was as popular a figure then as Taylor Swift is now, and that's true. Calling her "Lady Lindy" is much more annoying. She didn't need her identity mixed in with Lindbergh's to have legitimacy.
So many similar planes went down in the area during WW2 it’s impossible and irresponsible to claim it’s Earhart’s.
Rip
Wow, deeper than the titanic, how could it sink so far down.
The Pacific Ocean is deeper than the Atlantic
Gravity....
Good God don't compare Emilia Earhart to Taylor Swift in anyway please.One was an American pioneer and legend. The other is a entertainer and publicity hound.
Just one more possible theory. If it is? It definitely ends all other theories. But it will need physical confirmation. Only one way to do that. Have to go look somehow.
Taylor who?
Swift
I don’t believe that is her plane
Not the best or first female pilot; if she wasn't Mrs. Publisher Promoter Putnam, we wouldn't have heard of her.
Unfortunately not her plane. Looks more like a DC-3
Until there's footage of whats down there then it's just the same Headline that's been done many many many times
At 6:10 they have the suspected crash site dead west of Howland Island. You know that's off. It'll be north of Howland and most likely east east of the island.
Aren't we making a bit of an assumption? The same assumption that other searchers made?
If she was hitting headwinds she would have been low on fuel sooner and also would have been west of the island had she gone down. If she was North or east of Howland that would have required more fuel. Remember he based their location on the strength of the radio signal. I would be curious to know what the range of the signal strength would be before making different assumptions.
Looks like a single engine, swept-wing jet - nothing like Earhart's plane.
Doesnt look like it! That looks like a jet
her plane has enough fuel to fly across the ocean?
if so how many gallons?
This is a small plane on a big planet. Dude did not and will not find her.
Too many ads
My name is Amelia!
Was it really a mystery ? Did people think she went on the run or something ? I thought she crashed
its a mystery how she died
The mystery is where did she crash and what happened to her
@@jacksonhollingsworth974does it matter at this point
Let us know when you have something *conclusive.* Stop milking conjecture for imaginary internet points.
Until they get some good, clear pictures of it, or raise it, bull____!!!!!!!
It's at the bottom of the ocean. There is no visible light. And is too fragile to raise.
Sorry, I do not think so !! Good try !!
I doubt very seriously this is Amelia's plane. When you look at the diagram of it, versus the sonar image, IF it's a plane at all the wings are angled more like a jet of some kind. Beyond that I don't see how you can say it's hers and not a plane of similar size. I fully admit I'm no expert, and I could be wrong, but I just don't see it. I think it's a lot of wishful thinking.
Nobody confused George Putnam with George Putnam
No, they confused him with George Putnam.
More like a WW2 plane
Why not say possibly her plane in title that’s not much proof just a sonar image if you had a underwater sonar why not have a underwater ROV to verify your finds
What about D. B. Cooper? He's missin.......
Damn hell D B cooper? He’s thief
Show me the evidence !!
We just did a video showing his evidence.
the problem with the sonar is the swept wings as well as lack of engine nacelles on both wings. this guy is smoking crack.
... you probably gonna find a ditched, empty plane while she still alive and living la vida loca at 100+ years old, full of grandkids with the native men of a near by island and laughing at this interview
😀🏝️🏝️🏝️
Falsely, he's promoting a fake discovery.
I always wondered why we're not allowed to fly over the Pacific to get to Asia we have to go the long way around
Because the Earth is not flat. Planes fly in an arc because it’s the shorter distance compared to flying in a straight line.
You want to have a diversionary location available along your route. Generally they take a northern route. Along Alaska and then hop to Japan.
Who’s not allowed to fly over the Pacific? Vary strange comment 🤨
I seriously doubt that her plane is lying intact at the bottom of the sea. It is more likely that they bailed out and the plane crashed down because attempting a soft unpowered landing on water would be too risky. 🤔
"too risky"... really? 😂
and bailing out in the middle of nowhere over open ocean with about as close to zero chance of ever being found as you can get, is not too risky?
maybe im wrong, but would they not have some sort of liferaft onboard? or maybe inflatable rafts were not a thing yet...
either way, i do not think i would bail in that situation!
id rather it all end on impact, but survival instinct would likely kick in and i would try to land it anyway.
there really is no good option, but bailing would also mean a good chance of being separated too... and there you are all alone in the water just waiting for the inevitable.
@@ralphbooger4756 Parachutes yes. Life Raft very unlikely due to weight. They were on an ultra long distance mission. More weight onboard would consume more fuel. Pilots train for just such emergencies. Many pilots in WW2 bailed out. You obviously know nothing about planes and crew emergencies. Why would you post? We do not care what you "think" you would do...an unpowered water landing is an extremely difficult maneuver, and the chances are great for a complete breakup upon impact.
tootsie toy at 2 feet until you show us the real deal..hope it is but......... Air Force Major Joseph Gervais was a expert on the matter also and said Amelia was alive under an assumed name of Irene Bolam ...funny he didnt mention that being an Air Force guy ...Elgin Long said he knew whwere it was..16000 feet down off Howland
Yeah, and then Bolam sued the crap out of the guy who wrote the book saying she was Earhart.
everyone thinks they know everything we dont know how much damage her pland had so i think ill wait on better solar mybe it is mybe isnt qe dont know rt noq...its just a image
Does it really matter at this point she’s long dead
Well you are VERY late with that! famously loved and disappeared?
such a woman should be sponsored again, with statue and all,
but she has been forgotten? So she wasn't that important after all!
(It's a shame that she hasn't been properly looked for before!)
Deep Sea Vision, the Romeo Brothers, at best have a theory. I wouldn't call in a hypothesis. You don't have many facts. Charles Lindbergh flew non-stop from New York to Paris. Amelia flew non-stop from New Foundland to Iceland. How do you explain the credible radio transmissions on the evening of July 2 through July 5? Why to you discount, discredit the TIGHAR hypothesis?
Tony has not found crap... trying to scam resources to continue his hobby...
So how many FEET is 6, 000 meters? Why are you using meters??
Because everybody but the US Liberia. And. Burma use
The imperial system method of measurement
if this is her plane why was she photographed sitting on the dock with Fred Noonan and her aircraft on the rear of the Japanese ship on Saipan?
She wasn’t. There is a photo, that people thought it looked just like them and facial recognition was done and it was like 90-95%, while looking through a travel photo book, the same photo was found and it was dated to be roughly 1935
More lies
Let’s forget about the Malaysian plane
Oh yeah. Where is MH370? A jumbo jet that had modern tracking. It likely didn't go through a wormhole.
They'll probably find it next. If they get compensation from this.
It's not forgotten at all. It had a search done just as extensive as Amelia's,if not more? But you have to have a point of reference to try and do more searching.
You are making a fool out of your exploitation company this is not Airhearys plane
CLICK -BAIT-!!
That is not Airhears plane lol
Taylor Swift?
He's comparing their levels of fame, not their accomplishments.
I doubt this is her plane. First, the shape of the dotted imagine looks nothing like her plane. This guy is so sure he found it but he has little to no real evidence that this is it. I didn’t watch this one all the way through but did watch another interview. This man is unprofessional and has little tact. He has blown off other very extensive search results and finds to something as finding nothing more than a broken cosmetic jar. He has nothing to support his claim. Other researchers have hard evidence of things that were found that cannot be explained any other way but to say they point to Amelia. But I guess since he brought back this blurry image that could be a hundred different other kind of airplanes….this must be it. Don’t give this guy credit, applause, or even respect at this point.
Were you in love with Amelia ? You sound mad as hell.
I believe the Ocean Gate has the capability to bring the plane up.
Too deep ,too fragile.
It can’t be it if it’s deeper than the titanic there is no way it’s the airplane it would’ve been crushed beyond recognition
The airframe is not pressurized.
The airframe is not pressurized.
The airframe is not pressurized.
@@WALTERBROADDUS the titanic has been sitting 4,000 feet higher than this supposed crash site and it’s made of steel slowly being crushed and worn away by the pressure of the ocean depth and corrosion, the airframe on her plane is deeper than the titanic and considerable more fragile sitting for almost 70 years that we know of why would it still be intact is also had to sink to said depth
@@EverydayBlackout The aircraft is not affected by pressure because it's equalized. It filled up with water before it sank.🛩