It's obvious that your main concern is maintaining a 66 Book canon. Did you know that Jesus on two seperate occations and James also once quoted books outside of the accepted 66 books. Btw, Both Jesus and James when quoting those books called them " Scripture" Since Jesus Himself testifies of books outside of the 66 books, I'm gonna believe Jesus over you guys.
Didn't Jesus said that angels DO NOT have sex? Didn't Jesus Himself said after His ressurection, that spirit doesn't have flesh and bones? While we have angels who seduce the daughters of men, and had sex with them in the book of Enoch. I know that Jude wrote about angels who walk outside of their boundary, but this could mean the demons aka the fallen angels. In Jesus's time, there never were hybrids of angels and humans, and we have A LOT of demons and evil spirits work around. If the fallen are real, then there should exist some hybrids in Jesus's time. Because in the book of Enoch, there were hybrids. But there weren't. And MOST importantly, Jesus is the Son of Man, not Enoch.
I think the first 15 minutes of this video really explains the history aspect well. I appreciate that you guys didn't come out like a hard hammer for or against it, but rather explained the historical backdrop, the reason Jesus and the disciples were familiar with the text and why it is different than the rest of accepted Holy Scripture. I appreciate the time you put into this video. It is nice to come across some well-presented information in a world of heavily opinionated teachings. Keep it up.
Alex Bailey actually both of you are wrong !! Jacob wrestled with (some believe it refers to an angel) a divine being and did so all night and when the being told him to let go, Jacob said no! Not unless you bless me. And so, the being touched his hip and broke it and said his new name is Israel because he struggled with angels and prevailed with God
I don’t know if this was intentional, or if 119 ministries just did not read the entire book of Enoch, but they definitely left some very important details out and falsely accused the writer of claiming to be the messiah. I took their advice literally, “test everything”. It IS my responsibility and I have come to see this teaching on Enoch inaccurate. They spoke of one section from the book of Enoch, claiming that the writer is proclaiming himself the messiah. I believe that they were referencing 1 Enoch chapter 46. I highly encourage everyone to read it for themselves. It bothers me when people make up stuff so that they can take a definitive stand. Also, the argument about when it was written or the literature style, to me does not warrant a “this is a blasphemous book” stand. Why not take the stand of “we’re not 100% sure ourselves so we say read with extreme caution.
I know you wrote this a long time ago, but I agree. Plus Enoch 1 was found in the Dead Sea scrolls, or at least fragments of it. Clearly it has to date earlier than these experts claim since it was found in a cave that was all dated as earlier.
If Jesus quoted Enoch as scripture then who is anyone who is a believer to say that Enoch is not a valid book. To say that is to say Jesus quoted from a false work. Does any believer really want to go there??? YES!!! ALL should read the work for themselves. It is a very heady work and one truly needs to know their scriptures before reading it. I've read all3 Enochian books and Book 1 is the most accurate. Books 2 and 3 are adulterated IMHO and not trustworthy. If Joshua and 2 Samuel refer to it then it should be considered a genuine work otherwise to say it's a false work is to then say the bible is promoting a false book. We all need to use a little common sense and lots of prayers asking for discernment from the Holy Spirit when reading ANY work. If I might: 1 Enoch has chapters about the 364 day calendar. THIS BOOK is the TRUE ENOCH. 2 ENoch (SLavonic) is an adulterated work which attempts (badly it does) to fit our actual solar year of 365 and 1/4 days [along with pagan Gregorian calendar months]. This is incorrect and there are other parts in it also that are suspect. 3 Enoch is more rabbinic commentary and leaves out crucial calendar info. ALSO -- [and this is just a prediction it is pointing to (YES....I'm going to say it) aliens. Chapter 33 has text: "EACH ONE WITH THREE FINGERS" Chapter 44 alludes to GRAY PEOPLE. I have copious notes for all 3 books and various copies from different translators who published. So far 1 Enoch (Ethiopian) is the correct one. I hope that helps. IMHO stay away from the other two.
When does Jesus quote Enoch? I know Peter and Jude do, but we don't know if its the same version that is available through the Ethiopian church today. The parts of the book of Enoch found with the Dead Sea scrolls has some different words in it, not that it changes the meaning, but its not inerrant like the scriptures. I find Enoch useful for history and context.@@ateachableheart2649
Please add verse in the bible where " book of Enoch" is quoted. Not your opinion pls. Ppl lie all the time. I trust the bible. I dont have time for ppls opinion anymore
I,v learn so much from the book of Enoch how wonderful to know how God created each thing in time and how it has blessed me I am amazed at all the things I,v learned knowing God power and how amazing he is
Sheeeesh.....Thank God for the Holy Spirit, who leads to ALL Truth and Understanding. The FIRST Book of Enoch resonates as Truth in my Spirit, that is all I need.
I agree, the first one feel right to me the second one does not, at least not all of it, and haven’t even listened to the third. Heard it was not very trustworthy at all
5 Trust in the Lord with all thine heart; and lean not unto thine own understanding. 6 In all thy ways acknowledge him, and he shall direct thy paths. 7 Be not wise in thine own eyes: fear the Lord, and depart from evil. Proverbs 3
Jude directly quotes the Book of Enoch in the New Testament. It is part of Ethiopian Canon, one of the oldest established churches. This book both elaborates on Genesis 6 and further solidifies the truth about the Earth, Sun, and Moon. I have no doubt why it was done away with.
Not really. Enoch for sure isn’t inspired. Unless you believe that human kind can bring forth with the angel kinds. Can humans also bring forth of the gorilla kind, horse and other animals?!
@@godloves9163 And it came to pass, when men began to multiply on the face of the earth, and daughters were born unto them, That the sons of God saw the daughters of men that they were fair; and they took them wives of all which they chose. And the LORD said, My spirit shall not always strive with man, for that he also is flesh: yet his days shall be an hundred and twenty years. There were giants in the earth in those days; and also after that, when the sons of God came in unto the daughters of men, and they bare children to them, the same became mighty men which were of old, men of renown. And GOD saw that the wickedness of man was great in the earth, and that every imagination of the thoughts of his heart was only evil continually. And it repented the LORD that he had made man on the earth, and it grieved him at his heart.
@@zariahlafleurpowell7028 what’s your point? Sons of God are referring to as believers in God. Yes angels at some times have been referred to as sons of God, however, the New Testament is clear that angels CANNOT REPRODUCE and ARE NOT HUMAN 👉KIND👈. The Bible is clear that each kind can bring forth after THEIR OWN KIND. Is the angel kind the same as human kind?
@@godloves9163 no in fact there are different kinds of angles sons God is a family in Genisis it says let us make man in Our image. The arch Angel's are indeed sons of God arch over seer of the Angel's watchers of the Angels. Genisis 6 is a part of the bible that talks about the sons of God not humans at this point who hadn't been called into the God family yet. May God bless your study I'm just sharing what I've found it's ok if we believe different in our journeys to the one truth that God alone knows fully
@@zariahlafleurpowell7028 I did my research as well. People only imply it’s angels. Sorry it’s not spiritual angels, it’s either fleshly or not. There’s no hybrids. And yes there were giants in those days. Most of everything was giant, that’s the point. Genesis is showing the proof of giants because this is what our archeologists find today and can’t explain it except through the Bible lens. Giant reptiles aka dinosaurs, giant animals, giant insects. Hence why the bible says there were giants on the earth in those days.
I thank God that ancient B.C. scholars compiled the writings of Enoch and made them available in one concise document. Together, they give us a much better understanding of events that took place BEFORE the Great Flood... plus much more, of course. It is not relevant whether it is included in the "canon" or not. What is important is that we have available to us a greater understand of God's work that He has preserved for us over the centuries. "Study to shew thyself approved unto God, a workman that needeth not to be ashamed, rightly dividing the Word of Truth." The Book of Enoch is NOT a DIFFERENT truth, it only brings to light MORE understanding of the Scriptures. I thank God for that.
Like Dr Michael Heiser says, just because it's not in the Bible doesn't mean it's not important. The Old testament often quotes ancient literature and other books.
Praise Yah!!! It is a blessing to see so many individuals in the comment section dedicated to doing their own research and not just except the regurgitated talking points of uninformed men.
It’s simple to read the book of Enoch and prove it’s not valid. Easy question: Who deceived Eve? The Bible says Lucifer…book of enoch says an angel named Gadriel… So which one do you believe?
@@HajiStaxGaming First off, the Bible doesn't say Lucifer in reference to Satan. The only place where Lucifer appears is Isaiah 14:12 and the name means Light-Bringer and in this verse refers to King Nebuchadnezzar of Babylon. And it never even says Satan in reference to the Serpent; the Serpent is merely the Serpent.
@@ZetaMagnus Revelation 12:9 “And the great dragon was cast out, that old serpent, called the Devil, and Satan, which deceiveth the whole world: he was cast out into the earth, and his angels were cast out with him.” Weird….I got this right out of Revelation. Maybe you should re-read it. Literally says, “that old serpent, called the Devil, AND Satan.”. So….please explain to me in greater detail how the serpent is merely the serpent but not called Satan.
I stopped in minute 4:22 and wrote a comment. Then I began to read other comments... evidently 119 is rejecting the Book of Enoch. Big mistake. The fact is it is so suspicious to me that the Catholic-Jews Bible is 66 books..... you get my point.
Actually I’ll argue you here on just this 66 book point. There’s a good reason why Jesus arrives on the 40th book of the Protestant Bible, it’s the end of the waiting period. There’s a good reason why the New Testament is 27 books too(3x3x3, the Cube number). 66 isn’t a bad number, 666 is a bad number. That said, we agree, Enoch is originally inspired but there are errors added to the text. Most notably Chapter 22. Enoch is meant to be dissected by the Holy Spirit. Most but not all of it will pass the test. GOD Bless!
With all respect, your opinion about the content in the video does not come off as very trustworthy if you draw conclusions from only 4 minutes of watching and reading people's comments. Watch it first and be patient to hear them out, or else you cant form a legitimate opinion.
@@amkr186 I have studied the matter and sometimes you grasp the point of the author earlier. Anyway, if you don’t agree with me, it’s ok. You might someday agree if you study the matter for some hundred hours. It takes time and humility to admit that we have been deceived.
@@cmorales5 Yes you are right in that one can grasp a point earlier, I am sorry. I find that people arrive to very different conclusions depending on weather they derive information from the scriptures we know as the bible today or from these other sources. How come they would contradict? Those who use books like Enoch etc. will have different approaches to the appointed times and the calendar for instance. Any explanation? Do you believe the scriptures as we have them today have been altered?
"Matthew 22:29 Jesus answered and said to them, “You are mistaken, not knowing the Scriptures nor the power of God. 30 For in the resurrection they neither marry nor are given in marriage, but are like angels of God in heaven" the only book talking about angel not given in marriage is enoch
@@richardwhite6062 Well stated. The key statement is "but are like angels "in" heaven. Not the ones that got cast down to earth because of rebellion. This group is obviously going again the most high.
I don't agree that Hebrews 11:13 states that Enoch died. Hebrews 11:5 does clearly state that Enoch was taken by God, then verse 6 seems to give a breaking sentence that separates the thought, then comes back in verse 7 to continue the "by faith" segment. But I think verse 6 separates Enoch from the "all" the author bundles together in verse 13. Also, Jesus Himself quoted the Book of Enoch to the Pharisees and told them they err in not knowing the SCRIPTURES! So I really do not believe this was researched out biblically. Just my opinion. Blessings!
He has confused the Enoch from the Cain linage which is what most do when trying to contest the book of Enoch. There are 2 Enoch's & the Evil Enoch had many writings that are used to confuse the truth of GOD.
Enoch the son of Jared lived closely with god and was taken by god, Enoch the son of Cain died. These writings are believed to be from Enoch son of Jared
@Scott M Sykes Hebrews 11:5 does though. Heb 11:5 - "By faith "Enoch" was translated so as not to see death, and "was not found, because God translated him." For before his translation, he had obtained witness to have been pleasing to God." ( see Gen. 5:24 ) (LITV) "So as not to see death" - is very unambigious, that is very plain - Enoch didn't die. I personally believe he will be one of the two witnesses of Revelation 11
I agree, i was going to say that but its speaking more of abraham, and noah, not enoch when it says these men died... because the bible clearly states enoch did not taste death: we have to be 2 timothy 2:15 studiers! To rightly divide the Word of truth! God bless you!
Hebrews 11:13 does not say Enoch died. I believe Enoch will experience death along with Elijah. Revelation illustrates two prophets in the end times that cannot be harmed until God allows it. I believe those two prophets are Enoch and Elijah brought back to finish their work.
@@ricoparadiso I'm not exactly sure what you are asking. What we read in scripture is that John the Bapist was Jesus' cousin. He was his own man. Elijah is a completely different person. Elijah was a prophet about 850 years before Christ was born. The scriptures tell us that Elijah, like Enoch was taken by God. Those are the only two individuals in the Bible that mention being taken by God and not dying. In accordance to God's plan He will bring Elijah and Enoch back to be prophets in the end times. Revelation mentions the two prophets who can't be touched/hurt until He allows it, I just believe (because of the reasons I just mentioned) that it is Elijah and Enoch. If the "bringing them back" part seems hard to believe just remember that Jesus raised Lazarus from the dead, keeping in mind that Lazarus was actually dead compared to Elijah and Enoch who didn't die.
@@ricoparadiso John the Baptist was murdered by Herod, Elijah was transformed. Elijah will surely come back Mark 9:2-30 And after six days Jesus taketh with him Peter, and James, and John, and leadeth them up into an high mountain apart by themselves: and he was transfigured before them. And his raiment became shining, exceeding white as snow; so as no fuller on earth can white them. And there appeared unto them Elias with Moses: and they were talking with Jesus. And Peter answered and said to Jesus, Master, it is good for us to be here: and let us make three tabernacles; one for thee, and one for Moses, and one for Elias. For he wist not what to say; for they were sore afraid.
the book of Enoch is one of the scriptures which was meant for the end times only the wise will understand it not the foolish. This guy did not do enough research he listens the words of men then rely on the Holy Spirit.The book of Enoch is the word of G-D. The earth is flat just as it says do not listen to man who obey satan the evil one.He is the great deceiver who deceives the whole earth.May Yeshua guide and bless all who read His word, Amen
Sorry. You just aren’t accurate. It was quoted in the Bible and evidence suggest Jesus was familiar with it and it probably predates all the other books. Daniel even references a book that was for future believers in the end times. Enoch (through about the first 54 chapters) fits this prophecy perfectly. It was also found with the Dead Sea scrolls and new manuscript translations matched the older ones found with the scrolls.
Jude. Quoted in Jude. Jewish tradition supports it. One of the oldest surviving Christian Cultures (Ethiopia) and many small orthodox Christian sects still have the Book of Enoch in their cannon. Read it and it’s apparent why the Jesuits would want to remove it from modern translations.
I believe there are sufficient evidence that warrants a more thorough examination of the evidence. To throw the writing out, is a mistake. I think we are going to find out very soon how real the Nephilim really are.
@@franklinmc4457 The Nephilim were real as stated in Torah. There is no need for the book of Enoch to understand this fact. The book of Enoch is not inspired by YHVH. If you read the Torah you get enough information on giants, angels, and their interactions with men and women to be aware.
Jesus does not hate religion my friend, read the book of James : "Pure religion and undefiled before God and the Father is this, To visit the fatherless and widows in their affliction, and to keep himself unspotted from the world." James 1:27 (kjv) God bless you brother
(Ps: God does hate wickedness and deception, which is what FALSE religions are, there is only one true religion because there is only one true God 😁) have a blessed weekend!
When 119 is confident they know something, they block comments on their videos. When they question themselves, they open up the comments section to allow people to change their minds. This video is great evidence of that. And 119 ministries is very wrong on this video. The book of Enoch is very accurate.
@@jessicamatlock6786 If what you say is true, then Jesus was a false Messiah. Jesus said in John 3:13 "No man ascendeth up to heaven, but he who came down from heaven". Jesus was the one who came down from heaven, therefore NO OTHER MAN can ascend into heaven, except Jesus. This either proves you to be wrong in your Enoch interpretation, or it proves Jesus to be a liar and a false Messiah. Which one do you think is most likely? Scripture actually uses the word "translated" and not "taken" to describe what happened to Enoch. Enoch was translated to heaven. Heaven is a spiritual relm NOT A FLESHLY relm for men. Its very clear Enoch was "translated" into the spirit in order to be taken into heaven. Your mistranslation has turned Jesus into a liar.
2 Esdras 14:44 In forty days they wrote two hundred and four books. So the Bible is not 66 or 87 books, there are so many books went missing, ELOYHM/YHUH is not author of confusion but of peace, ... 2 Timothy 3:16
I see no reference to Enoch in Matthew. Matthew 22 29 Jesus answered and said unto them, Ye do err, not knowing the scriptures, nor the power of God. 30 For in the resurrection they neither marry, nor are given in marriage, but are as the angels of God in heaven. How difficult would it be, I wonder, for the devil to twist scripture to his own ends? Is Enoch quoted in Jude, or Jude quoted in Enoch? Now the Spirit speaks expressly that in the latter times some shall depart from the faith, giving heed to seducing spirits, and doctrines of devils; And I fear that as the serpent beguiled Eve through his subtlety, so your mind will be corrupted from the simplicity that is in Christ. Tempting, this new knowledge is - these new books - secret until now... hidden... the new truths we now have. Don't they taste good! Jesus is the way, the truth and the life. There is only one way to the King, and it is narrow. If reading Enoch helps you get to know Jesus, good for you! But remember, no lie is of the truth.
I personally think every mature believer grounded in Scripture should read Enoch prayerfully. I have benefited greatly from it in my understanding of Genesis. It has also changed the way I view world history and the history of God's people. It goes into detail about what the fallen angels were doing and how genetic mad science and sorcery was introduced to mankind. It also gives more context as to why we have all of these same creatures showing up in mythology and lore all across the globe; things like mermaids, dragons, giants, goblins, minotaurs, fairies, centaurs, werewolves, shapeshifters, bigfoot, UFOs and aliens. All these creatures trace their origins back to some kind of supernatural source which we know as the fallen angels who wanted to create their own reality on earth in rebellion to God. As it was in the days of Noah so shall it be in the days of the coming of the son of man. The reason why I believe what Enoch says is because I am seeing the same things come back nowadays, the way people are playing with genetics and even the human soul. And the way sorcery and all kinds of demonic doctrines are coming more to the forefront and even being taught to children in schools. The way the basics of natural order like gender is being rejected in favor of creating our own false realities, that means we can have sex with anything and everything just like the people did before the flood. This opens the door to sex with demons which will create all kinds of problems. I believe these extra details presented in Enoch will help protect God's people even more from deception because we have a better idea of what to look out for.
Thank you for sharing this.I personally found this very long and a lot to take in all in one go. I Believe in The Heavenly Father And In Jesus Christ and The Holy. Spirit.I do Believe Enoch and need to study this for myself with the Help of The Holy Spirit. Amen.
Well said..uts all we need to do..take in everything, dismiss all religious dogmatic religions..go to our lord Jesus CHRIST only,,rinse repeat..to our lord for holy discernment!
The book of Enoch exposes the lies of Satan. The satanists could not control the whole earth through fear, if the people of the Earth depend on Yehovah. They had to come up with lies about Yehovah's creation and how insignificant mankind is. For this, first they got rid of Yehovah's witness in the Book of Enoch. Then they started the propaganda mechanism with NASA, Media and Pseudo Science. Pray to Yehovah to remove the scales over our eyes created by false propaganda, so that we can understand the truth. And the truth shall set us free from the evil clutch of satan.
Apostle Jude is a reliable man of Christ and of The Father in Heaven. He clearly mentioned "Enoch Seventh from Adam". It is at his precise words when he quoted (Jude 1:14-15) verse from the Book of Enoch (1:9) both are parallel. This is full well enough Enoch's scripture was indeed inspired. Jude knew it, and hypocrites don't.
Grow up and dig a little deeper to understand the full picture. Listen to the entire video and read some entire articles ok this topic. You are just cherry picking and ignoring what you don't like. YOU are the hypocrite.
We can jump around all day but only one verse matters here. 2 Timothy verses 16-17 "All scripture is given by inspiration of God, and is profitable for doctrine, for reproof, for correction, for instruction in righteousness"
What I find astounding is that people don't have any spiritual discernment . In the New testament Jesus teaches us about demons. The book of Enosh explains where the demons came from. Most the books in the new testament contain word for word references from the book of Enosh.
Jacobus Van der Merwe I really can say, I didn’t understand the difference between demons and fallen angels until reading Enoch. Demons come from dead Nephilim. Even one of the words used for demons is also talking about Nephilim, the Rephaim. I asked a guy from Israel, “what is a Rephaim?” He said demon, although in the Bible the first appear as Giants, then later as demons and the inhabitants of the underworld.
@@spitflamez yes the angels had sex with the daughters of men and their offspring were giants. When these giants died because they were born on the earth they became demonic spirits. The original 200 angels that decided to cohabit with woman are bound till judgement day.
@@jacobusvandermerwe1922 Regarding Enoch, some doubters get caught up on certain words and passages in Enoch, just like in Jubilees and Jasher. They get too caught up on things that appear out of line or incorrect and start assuming the entire book is false or something. People who do that are not understanding by the spirit, instead, they may gain some understanding then listen to "scholars" who have there own agenda to debunk the text, then this cycle continues on and on. Jesus will soon make things clear to all.
@@kervinrobinkneshoa7213 the book of Enoch explains this the angels that sinned in Genius 6 took daughters of men and slept with them their children became giants. When these giants were killed they became demons or evil spirits. They were told to remain on earth as they were made on the earth
Interestingly, the Book of Enoch was quoted by all the apostles in the NT. If that weren't enough, Jesus quotes it without hesitation, including calling Himself the Son of Man time after time, just as Enoch speaks of Him, time after time, in his book.
All i can say is the book of enoch makes me change my life totally,when i read how enoch petition for the fallen angels and God rejected all 200,it teaches me that we take Sin too lightly and think that as we say Lord forgive us we are forgiven,i cried ,i got scared,these now a days pastors only interested in money,they don't preach hell and holiness
he has zero original thoughts he uses other authors to discredit and describe texts in the best way he thinks/assumes. I cant take him seriously at all
@@brucedressel8873 🤣 you're a fool. and have fallen for the beast system aka Roman Central Currency through the Vatican and they couldn't do anything because the Dead Sea scrolls were hidden for a reason
Agreed, just like what he said Enoch died in Hebrews 11:13. I didn’t read as such that Enoch died ...maybe they had other interpretations that I don’t understand?
Jude is included in the Bible, he spoke of Enoch he wasn’t mocked for it. After, Paul spoke Enoch to the Jews in Hebrews He was inspired by the Lord. Are we to say we can’t trust Paul writing that Enoch was translated?? Yet these are saying they trust some scholar instead??? Or doctrines of men? Are we not to test all things with the Bible? Would their not be warnings against trusting in Enoch or maybe just not mentioned at all? I have seen other videos on this ch. & am seeing the same pattern of choosing scripture to their interpretation and making it sound like there is no way to think otherwise than what they are presenting. DANGEROUS! BEWARE & BE AWARE!!
Spiritual truth i think this is literally just a rouse to bring out the anger and evil these guys cant be this serious. They test nothing and are taught these things and cant re kearn their way around it i have tried to talk to these kind of channels with the same end everytime they speak their brliefs and refuse or spiritually are blind to it and until they come to Jesus they will stay this way. I try to speak to other channels and go back and forth on scripture and i always end up amazed they will not hear what the scripture says. I hope that if nothing else it plants the Seed
Well they also say adults would eventually become circumcised, completely obliterating what Paul warns in Galatians. However- Jew and Gentile are to become one flesh. Worship on the same days, set apart by God, and eat the same foods, not grieving one another. The Spirit will lead to all truth, and the Spirit will lead to Torah and how God always wanted to circumcise our hearts.
Elwood M. Buel well what is required of gentiles in the Torah and what was taken away with Jesus. Like the feasts did anyone get Leaven out of their house and have perfect unspotted lamb for dinner and make sure that none of it remain in the morning. Or is Jesus the Perfect Lamb that and to celebrate it would just be remembering our sins yr to year that can never be judged by food or feast say. 🙏🏼Romans 6:6knowing this, that our old man was crucified with Him, so that the body of sin might be annulled, that we are no longer enslaved to sin. 7For the one having died has been freed from sin. 8Now if we died with Christ, we believe that we will also live with Him, 9knowing that Christ, having been raised up out from the dead, dies no more. Death no longer rules over Him. 10For that which He died, He died to sin once for all; but that which He lives, He lives to God. 11So also you, consider yourselves to be dead indeed to sin, but living to God in Christ Jesus. 🙏🏼👉this is the Berean Literal which matches to original greek best. Notice the term “old man” this is also the same reference as the Parable of the Wineskins. Which is about the Old & New Covenants. Which is also in the story of the Wedding where Jesus turned water to wine and that He Brings the Good Wine now. Sorry this is long but since Christ.Truther and Parable of th Vine. Blocked me and my second ch. The people will choose their own paths. And if they believe they have hidden truths the all will fall into the ditch. As for the Torah one easy Scripture answers that John 6: 28Therefore they said to Him, “What must we do, that we may be doing the works of God?” 29Jesus answered and said to them, “This is the work of God, that you should believe in Him whom He has sent.” 🙏🏼this is also why it is important to have Faith in Salvation where if you are bringing the Gospel the Torah is not there. Why a man can accept Jesus in his death bed seconds before his death. Hiw can one be saved in this manner with the Torah? Seek truth in the New Covenant and you will find it
I really appreciate your review on the books of Enoch, Jubilee and Jasher. If I had read them before listening to your testing, I would have read them in error. I would have believed them to be valid, I appreciate how you use the Canon of God's scripture as your ultimate authority. Thank you for testing The book of Enoch may God bless you. Shalom!
WRONG! WRONG! WRONG!!! TEST the books for yourself but be forewarned! You had better know your bible inside and out FIRST. THATY is the ONLY WAY to test those written works and they have MERIT. SHAME on anyone who says otherwise becaue in their railings of false works, they ERR and expose themselves as untrustworthy.
@@LuminousTwinHearts I retract my statement. After 2 years of research I have concluded that all three books of Enoch are scripturally based and are the first three of the 360 books that he wrote.
Thus said 𐤉𐤄𐤅𐤄, “Cursed is the man who trusts in man and makes flesh his arm, and whose heart turns away from 𐤉𐤄𐤅𐤄. For he shall be like a shrub in the desert, and not see when good comes, and shall inhabit the parched places in the wilderness, a salt land that is not inhabited. Happy is the man who trusts in 𐤉𐤄𐤅𐤄, and whose trust is 𐤉𐤄𐤅𐤄. For he shall be like a tree planted by the waters, which spreads out its roots by the river, and does not see when heat comes and his leaf shall be green, and in the year of drought he is not anxious, nor does he cease from yielding fruit.” “The heart is crooked above all, and desperately sick - who shall know it? I, 𐤉𐤄𐤅𐤄, search the heart, I try the kidneys, and give every man according to his ways, according to the fruit of his deeds.” Yirmeyahu (Jeremiah) 17:5-10
@@powerplay4real174 I use a few as a baseline, but translate most words directly, or confirm them, before sharing, to the best of my ability. I have not found a translation without error.
Let Yah be true and every man a liar!! HalleluYAH for the Ruach hakodesh and truly a baruch to see the body of who are being led in discernments comments and trusting in our Father alone!! Enoch the prophet as Jude said is just that a prophet! “Since the day that your fathers came forth out of the land of Egypt unto this day I have even sent unto you all my servants the prophets, daily rising up early and sending them: Yet they hearkened not unto me, nor inclined their ear, but hardened their neck: they did worse than their fathers.” Jeremiah 7:25-26 KJV Our understandings only comes from one teacher in truth the Ruach hakodesh for no longer will a man have to teach his neighbor. Regardless if we have not been led to the same understanding at the time we love each other and pray for each other and be thy brothers keepers!! For there are always going to be different parts of one body and milk and meat, and babes and elders yet a house divided cannot stand!! Paul before the road to Damascus was in erred understanding yet one of the elect and we are all in erred understanding each day to not rely on our own wisdom for we learn as a child of Yah daily and only emuwnah “faith” is credited as righteousness!! Shalom and love fam.
If Enoch was with God then he could have seen what happened at mt Sinai. Am I correct! God knows all things and angels can see from above so how is that not true too.
Yes! the first section of 1 Enoch describes God showing himself to the people of Israel at Sinai and it describes the covenant that God made with his people and declares that God keeps that same covenant. The rest of the bible agrees and shows time after time how God keeps those same promises with his people.
They are so bias they erased my comment because I challenged them and I was not inappropriate in anyway they are like Facebook fact checkers, very sad, they are not genuinely interested in the validity or not of the book of Enoch they are just trying to wash their hands so they don’t lose any reputation by endorsing it in anyway
Enoch was not an angel. The Bible never states that Enoch went to Heaven, just that he was saved from death. If you believe scripture, Yeshua says specifically: John 3:13 “No one has ascended into heaven except he who descended from heaven, the Son of Man.” This verse should shut all discussion down about the topic of Heaven. Elijah was transported to another place, we know this because he sends a letter to Jehoram. All of the prophets talk about going to sleep in the dust, nothing mentioning going to heaven and looking down on the sorrows of this world or being an angel. David is said to be “sleeping with his fathers” it mentions nothing of going to heaven.
@@soloscriptura7451 Did not Jesus tell the thief on the cross, "Today thou shalt be with me in paradise?" Is not paradise heaven? So in other words, Jesus told the thief he would be WITH JESUS in paradise.
@@zjmtnvols nothing in scripture indicates that he went to Heaven. He was telling him he was redeemed for believing in him, therefore the law of sin and death does not apply to him. I’ll pay you to show me anywhere in scripture it says “such in such is in Heaven” besides Yeshua. You won’t find it, because it’s not there. Shalom.
This is a clear teaching of the deception of The Book of Enoch and I thank you for sharing this video here on youtube. It is so important for us as Christians to test everything and I am thankful that I found it:)
@@herbis1 They quote a few verses NOT the message of the Book. They used it as an analogy for readers that were familiar with Enoch, must as current pstors might make a Star Wars or Lord of the Rings reference they know that their listeners will understand. This does NOT make the whole Book true. DUH!
But again couldn't this book just have copied these and tried to explain it with the theory it saw fit ? I mean read chap 70 of the book of enoch, the messiah is revealed to be him!
I think that's a bit of a stretch, it is just a historical book influencing culture of the time of Christ, doesn't make it inspired scripture, but a good reference to understand the culture and thinking of the time. Not more not less... it just is.
@@stephaniejazzy7359 not at all sister it doesn’t say that, that’s what Enoch heard it doesn’t mean the Angels were talking about him, is a miss interpretation. Enoch is absolutely messianic glorifies Jesus Christ and it doesn’t contradict any doctrine of the Bible these 119 guys they are just simply very bias, they have a lot to loose if they seem to endorse it, they are not genuinely interested in the book’s possible validity.
I read this quote and immediately I understood that it was (Christ, Jesus) that spoke to Enoch so I'm going to interject the meanings that this word says to me! "And the Head of Days (Christ, Jesus) came with Michael and Raphael and Gabriel and Phanuel and thousands and tens of thousands of angels without number. And he (Christ, Jesus), came to me and greeted me with his voice and said to me, "You, (Juan), (this is my name) (are), (Of course I question this "are" here in parenthesis), that Son of Man, (Didn't God call Jeremiah Son of Man a few times?), who was born for righteousness (In Christ Jesus aren't we all born for righteousness?), and righteousness dwells on you, (Isn't Christ indwelling in makes me the righteousness of God in Him?) and the righteousness of the Head of Days, (Christ, Jesus) will not forsake you." (Didn't Jesus Christ say that He would never leave me or forsake me?) Now my question is, wherein this phrase did Enoch usurp authority and became Christ other than Christ in him (Enoch). Enoch's role was to act like Christ as His representative in the role he was called to do and that's why God took him! Because Enoch did his job right! Don't throw the baby out with the bathwater! Paul says to take the good and throw out the bad!
@Paul kept the Sabbath Acts 18:4 Lol this is the same video that uses Hebrews 11:13 to prove that Enoch died? Try some reasearch dude, it's sad to say but this channel isn't the same anymore...
Members of the Church of Jesus Christ of latter-day Saints don't accept the books Enoch as canon. We do however have additional scriptures about him, but not derived from the apocrypha. Moroni is pronounced Mor-OH-nye, btw.
I confirm the Book of Enoch is NOT cannon and is considered apocryphal. Also, we are NOT an " end times community" any more than other deciples Jesus Christ.
Very bias and they just simply don’t believe, they just analyze superficially, all Christian “leaders” have a lot to loose if they more than endorse Enoch, however in the book there is a wealth of knowledge and revelation that doesn not contradict doctrine.
You can't prove the book of Enoch was on the Ark. Im not disproving the book..But it was written by another author..Read it carefully, someone Its telling a story..
@@gravityfallscanada I take everything with a grain of salt...I don't believe everything in the bible is inspired because it was written by different authors and manipulated throughout the ages by jews & Christians to promote their agenda and exert control. I think the bible & the book of Enoch tell a great story about our past, our future and our creator. Should i apply a critical thought process?....My answer is yes..You are entitled to your own opinion, just as i am.
i thank you, 119 ministries, for your perspective on enoch. the calendar in enoch is interesting. the jews keep the lunar calendar for the moedim which seems illogical and not scriptural. i have heard even the jews know something is off with their calendar. well, we all do the best we can to serve our Creator. may Yahuah bless 119 ministries!
chemtrailmary said "the jews keep the lunar calendar for the moedim which seems illogical and not scriptural". HAVE YOU EVEN READ THE SCRIPTURES? Psalms 104:19 "He appointed THE MOON for moedim"! It literally says the lunar calendar was for MOEDIM! quit spreading lies
@@brenosantana1458 while the Qumran calendar is so very close, they have ERRED in the beginning of how to calculate it. Sad but true. The true calendar is Sabbath FRAMED. Rabbi Jonathan Sacks (may his soul rest in peace) showed me this truth in one of his precious books, but I could tell he had no clue about it at the time of the writing. In fact, he knew things without knowing them, if you can receive that. His books are chocked full of wisdom and nuggets.
@@mattyice3036 WRONG. The Judaic lunar calendar system was brught in by posers who fled form Babylon along with Judah to come back to Israel. I'm pretty sure you won't like hearing that but if you do your homework you'd already know this. The bible speaks of this in Esther. SMH......Abba !! Please help your Children to KNOW YOUR TRUTH!!!
I own the Paul C. Schneiders version and It doesn't say (in Enoch 71:13-14) that Enoch is the Son of Man. I always feel like so many people misquote apocryphal books. I was hoping that this man would put my mind at ease and convince me that there are only 66 valid books and everything else is a fraud (that would make life so much easier) but the more I look into it... the more I see that these books are valid. Maybe not canonical but definitely valid or at the very least credible.
@saulcruz87 - Both Enoch and the book of Jubilees tell us that man will make errors regarding the years, months, weeks and days. Keeping an open mind to study these "controversial" books, IMHO is proof of a seeker of truth. In my own experience, it seems we are on a mission to mine out nuggets of truth, or call them pieces of the big picture puzzle. Sometimes, it only takes finding that one piece for the picture to make sense. I firmly believe that many authentic works that contain truth have been kept from us and only the ones that serve an agenda have been allowed to be given to us and not in an incorrupt way, but certain words are changed to change the very meaning and understanding of the verse in question and since it doesn't match the context of surrounding verses, it can cause confusion which then makes the student give up. A very ingenious way for the devil to keep one from knowing the truth. I could share how this began with the Hebrew language, but it's too long to share here. The bottom line is this: NO ONE should let these "inconsistencies" keep them from the basic simple FAITH of Jesus Christ.
So sad they are bashing the Book Of Enoch, Hosea 4:6 "My people are being destroyed because they don’t know me. Since you priests refuse to know me, I refuse to recognize you as my priests. Since you have forgotten the laws of your God, I will forget to bless your children." Book of Enoch 5.8 When wisdom is given to the chosen they will all live, and will not again do wrong, either through forgetfulness or through pride. But those who possess wisdom will be humble. 5.9 They will not again do wrong, and they will not be judged in all the days of their life, and they will not die of wrath or anger. But they will complete the number of the days of their life. And their life will grow in peace, and the years of their joy will increase in gladness and eternal peace; all the days of their life. The Book itself is for the Bible and Pro-God!
Well, I didn't realize you all opened the comment sections of your videos up for iron-sharpening-iron discussions B-) I do commend you for this, and I pray Truth Seekers can learn to discuss these things in love (these types of discussions/studies help us to "grow in love") ;-) I need to watch this vid, but I do have thoughts on the luminary chapters of Enoch as it relates to the concept to Time and/or to putting Genesis 1:14 in action. Stay tuned, and I will let you know my thoughts on your thoughts ;-) Shalom Friends B-)
Faith Child we’ll see how long the comment section stays on. Lately when too many people disagree with their teachings, they will turn off Likes and Comments.
poorly researched? if you cannot refute their argument, you have no argument. I myself have the book of Enoch but I dont know enough to make claims like yours.
The Holy Spirit and flesh (Mary mother of Jesus) created the ONLY begotten son of God = Jesus Christ. Angels and humans cannot procreate as angels are spirits and humans are flesh. Do you see the problem here? believing angels and humans can have children takes away the Truth of Jesus Christs Unique birth.
@@jessicabates1223 There were giants in the earth in those days; and also after that, when the sons of God came in unto the daughters of men, and they bare children to them, the same became mighty men which were of old, men of renown. The first mention of "sons of God" in the Hebrew Bible occurs at Genesis 6:1-4.
@@jessicabates1223 In Job 38:7 the “sons of God” are angels too! In Job 38 God is speaking to Job and reviewing how the universe was created. In verse 4 God asks Job if he was present when God laid the foundation of the world. Verses 5 and 6 are more questions about the creation. Then verse 7 asks if Job was present when the stars sang and the “sons of God” shouted for joy. Again “sons of God” refers to the holy angels who existed at the time of the creation.
Love your work, however this presentation was troublesome to me... Did Jesus use terms found in Enoch in referring to himself? Is Enoch an end time prophet? Why did you choose the translation you sourced? Did the Essene Community become the first Christians? You presented hypothesis and assumptions based on only one side of the narrative. It would be extremely interesting to have you present an opposite view citing different sources or to have a yeshiva style debate that would allow the listeners to determine their own conclusions.
Diane Essenes were pagan. It’s frustrating how people rewrite history. That’s like saying whites were the first Americans. They were not. Nowhere in Dead Sea Scrolls are Essenes mentioned. This guy is a typical false teacher who panders to Juda-ism religion and x-tian religion also. The actual “early Christians” or assembly never doubted or rejected Enoch. It was not until the 5th century CE. Rome rejected it and pseudo (protesting) Romans do also, except for some people who identify as x-titans. More people are realizing Enoch is Scripture and the historical and prophetic implications.
After seeing this I'm still unsure. Not leaning towards anyone view [lean more toward scripture.] But what I'm saying is I'm open to the possibility of enoch being reliable right now due to my little understanding of Torah. I'm praying that Yah will make it clear in the days moving forward.
To deny this book as scripture would be tantamount to calling Jude (among others in the scriptures) a liar. We would in fact be calling God a liar. Jude quotes from this very book. Jude also called Enoch a prophet. He also gives him antiquity (with his lineage). Jude preached from this mans book to his congregation. Jude never would have taken the liberty to say such things if they were not true. God loved this man so much that He took Him to live with Him in heaven. This is a prime example of why John said in 2nd John 20 & 21 Knowing this first, that no prophecy of the scripture is of any private interpretation. For the prophecy came not in old time by the will of man: but holy men of God spake as they were moved by the Holy Ghost. Like any men or women of today, you have been taught by the same ones that Jesus warned us about. The false teachers. The nephilim's educational system (now called the seminary). I would urge you to consult God on this matter. The holy spirit is the only way to the truth. Not man. May God bless you with His truth that you may see with both eyes, and hear with both ears. Amen.
If the Book of Enoch has no significance, why did God tell me to bring it to people's attention over eight years ago...I had never even heard of it, until He told me about it...
A lot of things are in the dead sea scrolls, but it doesn't mean that all of them equates to Scripture. During the time of the Essenes, the Tanakh structure of the Old Testament had already been firmly established and that is the Scripture for them. Now speaking of which, the dead sea scrolls undeniably contains many writings which does express some truth to them, such as 4q246, otherwise known as the Son of God text. However even though such texts are found within the dead sea scrolls, it doesn't equate to Scriptures.
research and teaching? They literally gave their bias opinion with ZERO PROOF using scripture, which is required as a witness. They used NO WITNESSES to make their false accusations. since when is an opinion piece considered "research"? The fact is, not one single thing in the book of Enoch goes against the laws and commands of YHWY, or the teachings of Jesus, yet the book of Enoch does "in lock step" support these same things of YHWY and Jesus. hmmmmmm
I humbly disagree with you on this one. But, that's okay. We're not all going to agree on everything all the time. We all see through the glass darkly. 🙂
In Matthew 22 and Luke 20 Yahshua is asked which man's wife this woman will be in the resurrection. yahusha tells them that they do are and they do not know scripture for we do not marry in the resurrection will be like the angels. Well how would they know this because this is not found in the 66 book Canon? This information is only found in Enoch. Yahusha calls Enoch scripture in this statement by saying they do not know scripture. Many people who believe in the ball earth don't believe Enoch is scripture. Even though there are many descriptive texts of the Earth in the Bible, and none of them describe it as a ball. Also this ball Earth idea only came in the last 200-300 yrs. All the early Hebrews not to mention the other cultures believed in a flat Earth. Moses actually spoke to the Most High, u think he wouldn't know?
@@wendy2593 Yeshua used the Torah as the sword in the temptation against the devil. All prophecies were supposed to be judged by the Torah. He heavily relied on the Torah. He is the living Torah, the word of God. We don't know whether Yeshua and the apostles quoted Enoch as a prophet of God or whether they were referencing a popular teaching from one who was deemed a prophet. Yeshua quoted teachings by the Pharisees and Saduccees as well as the Oral Torah (later written down as the Mishnah and Talmud) as references. In that particular passage, He is answering the Saduccees with the teachings of the Pharisees. Granted not all doctrines of the Pharisees were wrong; He agreed with them on some principles and observances. In these verses, I don't know whether He is agreeing with the Pharisees or not. However, Yeshua rebuked them for exalting the Oral Torah and traditions of men above the written Torah. I've read some of the Mishnah and Talmud. There are many legends and rabbinic teachings used to comment on the Hebraic scriptures. Some make sense and shed light on the Torah or give historical backgrounds on the people and cultures. But there are a lot of rabbinic commentaries that require a stretch of the imagination. For example, the earth was created on the 1st of Tishri (named after the book of Genesis). Some sages taught that this is what happened on the day of the creation of man: Adam and Eve were created, they fell, Eve bore both Abel and Cain -- all on the same day! Then there's Abraham. Abraham married Keturah after Sarah's death; Keturah was actually Hagar whose name was changed and she bore many more children to Abraham. Although I don't know the timeline of those above teachings, I believe many of the religious leaders were influenced by pagan beliefs and practices. Such beliefs and practices were thought to have come from Cain and his descendants. The famous ones came from Nimrod whose worship moved into all other nations. During the exile, the Jews learned the ways of the pagans and idolatry. So, stories and teachings were sometimes influenced by those cultures' religious beliefs. These teachings weren't absent during the time of Yeshua. It's understandable to think that Yeshua would've quoted what the Pharisees believed and taught, whether it came from the Oral Torah (which they said superseded the written Torah) or from any prophet they studied. Maybe the Pharisees taught about Enoch (since this quote supposedly only comes from Enoch) and Yeshua is quoting what the Pharisees were teaching at the time. Yeshua and the apostles would've known the the doctrines of the Pharisees, Saduccees, and Essenes. I'm not taking sides one way or the other. There's not enough evidence to convince me that Enoch is a true prophet considering the quotes about his being the "Son of Man." The fact that Charles needed to edit the book in order to make it more acceptable is rather concerning. (See video on Enoch: the Son of Man). I just feel like I need to study the Bible as I glean more each time I read it. The prophets there have enough for me to read and study. Interpretations vary on their writings, too. What are the correct interpretations? If I don't understand what they have to say, then I already have more digging to do regarding their prophecies.
@@csmitchell2227 where is scripture that says Yahshua quotes the oral talmud or oral Torah, where he calls it scripture? You might not believe that Enoch is scripture but I do. If you don't want to believe it you don't have to believe. I also believe that the book of Jubilee scripture. Are you Jewish, or follow their tradition? They also don't want to believe these. Proverbs 25:2 tells us that is is the glory of God to conceal a matter and it is the honor of Kings to search it out
@@csmitchell2227 you might enjoy watching the Honor of Kings series done by a guy named Sean Griffin and Ken Heidebrecht on a channel called Kingdom in context or on hanging on his words. in several seasons they cover several different books and you might enjoy it and you might glean something from it
@@wendy2593 Wherever you read where He says, "You have heard it said ...," He is most likely quoting the Oral Torah. The Pharisees exalted the Oral Torah above the Torah given to Moses. Yeshua contrasts what "You have heard it said ..." with "but I say unto you ..." Considering that Yeshua is the Living Torah and the Pharisees (the ones who were hypocritical) taught the Oral Torah, Yeshua is contrasting what they say to what He says. Almost every contentious moment He had with the Pharisees (the ones who were hypocritical), He was refuting their doctrine, the Oral Torah. Yeshua went on to point out the ceremonial handwashing, washing the pots, doing good works on the Shabbat, healing the sick on the Shabbat, plucking ears of corn in the field on Shabbat, the tithing mint & cumin above honoring one's father and mother, etc. When Yeshua healed a man on the Shabbat and told him to stand up and take his mat, Yeshua was challenging the Oral Torah that the Pharisees were teaching. When Yeshua used the ground and spittle to cover the blind man's eyes and healing him, He challenged the Pharisees again because it was "unlawful" to mix or mold things on the Shabbat. I'm a believer in Yeshua. I was not raised Jewish nor do I follow rabbinic teaching. I did indepth studies in the Torah for several years. Some of those studies did include what the rabbis taught and believed. From that, I was able to see what kinds of doctrines Yeshua refuted. I returned to the Hebraic roots of our faith in Yeshua in the mid-1990s. I believe that in Yeshua we become grafted into Israel and are joined together as One New Man. 119 ministries did do a video on that topic, explaining the basic teachings around One New Man.
Took me a few days to watch. I wanted to write a few things. You're clearly missing something if you're saying it was revealed to a select few... It's a book for all eyes to see, in the end times. This isn't gold plates with special glasses requirements, this is a printed distributed book. All Jews knew about it back then before the diaspora, not just a select few. How was it exclusive? You mean the elect? You gloss over many facts here as well. It's hard to write a paragraph about a 45 minute video but you saying in Jude they quote Enoch, then read the contexts which says "Enoch prophesied" then say it's not inspired. I mean think about that statement you make here. You're saying it's prophesy but not to be regarded as scripture? Do you ignore some prophets? Do you teach people to ignore the prophets? If what you say is true then Jude can not be trusted because of the false testimony here claiming Enoch is a prophet. Even if it was passed down orally then why do you think writing it would be any less true? The Brit Hadashah states clearly Enoch prophesied which means we must listen or disregard the book of Jude as well. Ignore Enoch to your own peril, it was written for our time. It emerged as Israel became a nation in day and the dead sea scrolls were found at the same time. give or take a couple months, it is significant evidence. Also if what you say is true and it's an oral tradition then you just opened up a can of talmudic worms because if that oral tradition made it into the Brit Hadashah then ALL of it must be considered. The way you steer the conversation is odd too with out reference. And don't get me started on your lame translation, did you purposely chose one that said "myriads" instead of 10 thousand to steer even more? Mine says 10 thousand not myriads. Even the first Enoch link in google shows 10 thousand, not myriad. The one quote from Michael Hesier is just an opinion also, no fact here. He is assuming something. This how you get led away. Jude plainly says it is prophesy, not a false doctrine. Is Michael Hesier your new Paul or is Jude enough? If you're going to question whether all of Enoch is trustworthy then you must do the same with the Brit Hadashah big time. The catholic fingerprints are disgusting in it. Entire lines are missing from the gospels, the lines with deep meaning. We walk around half blind trying to make sense of it all. It seems like your biggest problem with the Book of Enoch is that there are people who are chosen, the elect. Well I hate to break it to you but the Elect are real. Yeshua called me his Elect one day himself with his own mouth. Why would he break his silence on a day when I was not praying or doing anything religious just to say that if it wasn't important? Just working in my house, why would he break his silence to call me his elect? He told me he loves me, and I am his, he also told me to get ready. Not all are elect though so I will say that now so you don't call anyone who accepts Yeshua elect. Is that what you mean when you say it was for a select few? That book spells everyone out, the elect which always have Shalom with Abba, the righteous, who work for that same Shalom and the wicked who deny him and his ways. I don't mean literal work for the righteous, maybe accepting Yeshua and keeping the commandments is the "work" here. The righteous are those who do the will of God. The elect are not just anyone who believes but are selected for some reason. That has not been revealed. I do have prophetic dreams though. In one dream I watched a circle appear in the sky and angels poured out of it. People were screaming so loud. One angel flew to me and grabbed me and I woke up. Keep the commandments, keep the testimony of Yeshua, seek our fathers face. There is no greater reward!
Exactly right brother here in this video they are very biased against the book of Enoch they have a lot to lose in their reputation if they appear to endorse it same with Michael Heizer a lot of times he washes his hands, I like your point about Jude and like timothy Alberino says if Jude said that Enoch prophesied and the Bible says that Christ is the spirit of prophecy therefore the spirit of Christ must be in the book of Enoch . When they say in this video that the angels said you are the son of man they are totally unfairly forcing the interpretation that Enoch is the Messiah instead of Jesus hilarious and unfair the book of Enoch is completely messianic about a Messiah in the future he gives glory to Jesus Christ there is no contradiction to any biblical doctrine they even erased one of my comments acting like Facebook fact checkers and I was not inappropriate in anyway I simply challenged them . A lot of us know that if we truly pay attention and we make our spiritual ears sensitive to what’s going on behind curtains in this world we realized that the book of Enoch makes a lot of sense with all this pseudoscience lies that Satan is engineering for the system of the antichrist.
At 9:39 he seems concerned that we may not have an accurate representation of The Book of Enock as it was in the First Century. On that basis, we would have to conclude the same about the Canon... a foolish statement, as we must trust that God has protected ALL that he has passed on to mankind. Since we know that God DID reveal things to Enoch, we can be SURE that He had protected THAT word as well. Because Enoch struggled to describe things seen in his "vision(s)", is that any different than John's visions in the book of Revelation? John only shared what he saw. We trust the Holy Spirit to reveal what God was REALLY saying. Just saying...
So I’m guessing y’all didn’t watch the whole video. Because it’s very simple. Either you believe the Bible or you don’t. If you don’t , then you will continually be deceived. Everything this man said in the documentary he backed up with scripture
Book of Enoch (1) is a massive support to the case of Jesus, probably the best when you start to analytically understand the Tanakh and NT, history etc. Yes it was written late and not by The Enoch. Idk, it rings some truth to me at least.
The Book of Enoch is a book of lies made up over 2400 years after the events it pretends to tell about. It reeks of lies. It does NOT lead to Jesus at all. Why do you think it does???
@@justinerasmus8725 what most people don't understand: God gave the Torah to Israel. Israel and the children of Ishmael are RELATED through Abraham. I'm a very exact person when it comes to using correct terms. For anyone who is descended form Abraham to call another descended, an antisemite, they are also speaking against themselves. God states quite clearly that the nations can worship their other gods, but Israel, ONCE THEY ENTER INTO COVENANT with Him, are not allowed to. So my takaway from this is: If you feel called to practice Islam, then do so, but it serves a person well to explore everything related to God including the Bible that Christians and Jews have.
What Jesus says in Matthew 22:30 can only be found in 1 Enoch. Please refer to verse 29. And Jude alludes to 1 Enoch many times before directly quoting it, but you'd have to study "all scripture" (including 1 Enoch) to know that.
@@ateachableheart2649 Jesus also quoted other unbiblical sources. Does that mean those need to be included in the Bible? Secondly, the book of Enoch was a fake and how do you know it wasn’t written after claiming to be written before and then quoting Jesus…
@@godloves9163 Jesus IS LORD. For anyone who says otherwise by saying He quoted unbiblical sources is tantamount to blaspheming the Holy Spirit. Jesus had something to say about that. RU sure you wanna go there? I think you're a shill, certainly NOT a true follower of Christ Jesus.
@@godloves9163 please cite the source of information that proves Enoch is a fake book. NO ONE can prove that and even if they could, then that makes Jesus a fake and there my friend you tread on dangerous ground.
The book of Enoch is one of the most referred to books in the Bible. If it's valid enough to be quoted in canon it's good enough to be in the Bible, any other answer doesn't make sense. I understand that it's easier to defend what is rather than admitting that mistakes have been made.
Might I add that the gospels themselves are believed to have been written between 66-110 ad so that your dismissal of Enoch based on when it was believed to be written would also dismiss the gospel 😬
If Enoch 1 is used to help a Holy Spirit filled believer bear fruit according to DIRECT Scripture, it is exceedingly valuable to those ministering to people caught up in deeper doubt, occult practice or intellectualizing. Not everyone receives the Holy Spirit the first day they begin to turn away from Babylon. We are all to grow in faith not doubt.The Father knows all. This book would not be here and now in this position as is if it was not used to teach true discernment. It is a teaching adjunct. We all know how short the time is. Ezekiel was also called "the Son of Man". Do not turn away as to be so confused that you give up distrusting everything.
Our lord Jesus says take everything to him in prayer and holy discernment I don't think there's anything wrong with any of this material we should take it all in just like the Sumerian Tablets or anything else it's not about the religion it's about our lord Jesus
@@ravenstone366 Tertullian the Latin historian makes it clear why Sadducees didn't allow Enoch and the New Testament into the Jewish canon. Because both Enoch and the New Testament were too Christ Centric. Too many people were getting saved after reading them.
@@ravenstone366 As for the Christian Canon we can all thank The Council of Laodecia and St Augustine. Laodecia rejected Revelation and Enoch from the Canon. St Augustine with Hippo and Carthrage reinstated Revelation back into the Canon. But Enoch wasn't reinserted because Augustine doubted the Genesis 6 accounts. Despite being historically affirmed Augustine's faith wasn't strong enough.
Newfound Aventures Hmmmm. Why would you throw away thousands of years of history written by many different authors, speaking many different languages, coming from all walks of life but all telling the same story for a book that contradicts all of that history? Perhaps you don't really know the history of our Bible, how it came about, why it came about and when or how it was transcribed, how it was treated, the different of materials used for ancient manuscripts and scrolls, how meticulous the scribes were during transcription and how they prided themselves on accuracy, who decided what books were in the Bible and which books weren't and why.
Here..pause the video and read this: There is no secret to be close and to be with YAHUWAH. You only need to be good, kind, honest and most of all humble.
The book of Enoch proves that the earth is flat and that Yahuah's Calendar from exodus 12:1 is what we should. Oh, and by the the FULL MOON is the new moon to start the count to the sabbath's and festivals. This is why those that adhere to Judaism reject the book of Enoch. May Yahuah bless you!
@@named161 the earth is flat. Why would they fake the moonlanding? If the sun and moon are lights in the firmament, it doesnt make any sense for them to be planets. Space isnt like you think space is the place of celestial waters.
@@Mano.Mujica Simply the earth isn't flat. You're trying to use the Bible to push your ignorant idea... I wonder if you've also not read in Isaiah where the scriptures says that the Lord sits in the circle of the Earth??? Simply .... The Bible isn't teaching geography. It's passing a message of God's love , power and salvation to us in a way we will understand. Simple.
All I know, and I am just a sinful man, not a Scholar, not a Theologian, just a man called by God to study and search for "The Truth," that is, "The Word of God." Therefore, I search and I study.......... to me, I have been called to study the "prophecies" of Enoch and gain a better understanding of The Revelations of Jesus Christ as told to the Apostle John. Read, study, and most of all, "discern!" Discern and Believe........ Jesus, I Trust in You! Hallelujah!!! Thanks and Blessings!!!
I don't want to spam the comment section, but I do have another question. When Jesus reprimanded the Pharisees in Matthew chapter 22 verse 29 and 30 saying _29 Jesus answered and said unto them, _*_Ye do err, not knowing the scriptures,_*_ nor the power of God._ _30 For in the resurrection they neither marry, nor are given in marriage, but are as the angels of God in heaven._ What scriptures is Yeshua referring to? There is no where eles in the Bible explaining this, however the Book of Enoch *does* give us an explanation. I am not dogmatically saying that the Book of Enoch is Canon because of this one oversight however this definitely leads me to believe that the words of God have been perhapes tampered with...
Gravity Falls Canada Yep. That’s Enoch 15. The Sadducee, not Pharisee attempted to debunk the resurrection by using Tobit. Yahusha rebutted by using Enoch.
2 ''And go, say to the watchers of the shamayim who have sent you to intercede for them, 'You should intercede for men, and not men for you. 3 'Why have you left the high, qodesh, and eternal shamayim, and lain with women, and defiled yourselves with the daughters of men and taken to yourselves wives, and done like the children of earth, and begotten giants as sons? 4 'And though you were qodesh, spiritual, living the eternal hai, you have defiled yourselves with the blood of women, and have brought forth with the blood of flesh, and, as the children of men, have lusted after flesh and blood, as those also do who die and perish.
Just because a book isn't canon doesn't make it not written by the acclaimed writer. It just means that it's not true or honorable enough to be taken as gospel.
Who are these church fathers to decide for us what is or not the inspired word of God? Only the Ruach Hakodesh (Holy Spirit) can guide us in to all truth Jn 16:13. HE will tell us what is inspired word of Yahuah, not those people who decided for us what we can or cannot read. I follow the Holy Spirit not Jews or scholars, or historians, much less 119 ministries. I will decide what is the word of Yahuah along with His guidance not theirs. Blessings and peace to all.
The 1st and 2nd Book of Enoch is legit, but the 3rd is Jewish Kabbalistic Writing's. The 1st Book is quoted in the Book of Jude word for word and the 2nd Book describes God Himself perfectly.
Praise the Lord the thing that makes me very sad is that people change staff and later claim God changed staff ,also the people who claim books are misleading but have never actually read these books ,some of you believe Elijah didn't die and was taken up in glory but Enoch wasn't so that God who enable that to happen to one prophet can't do it for another. Many believe God's word can't be temped with but yes it can but it will be preserved and if you seek for truth you will find it .I have read most lost book of the Bible it has given me a certain understand of things and events that happen and now I know why these books were taken out from the Bible because people should be kept in the dark of how powerful they are ,God created us more powerful then anything he created including Angels .But am here to encourage people to read books and ask the Holy spirit to give you the spirit of disearnment and trust me if those books aren't important you will know and your eyes will be open to truth .Am not saying am right but we should examine staff ourselves not relay on other people's oppinion .Remember the Sabbath was temped with so for those who think the word of God can't be touched think again but he still preserves the truth and those who seek the truth will find it.shalom
Eleven Aramaic-language fragments of the Book of Enochwere found in cave 4 of Qumran in 1948 and are in the care of the Israel Antiquities Authority. They were translated for and discussed by Józef Milik and Matthew Black in The Books ofEnoch. Another translation has been released by Vermes and Garcia-Martinez.
I stopped listening at 11 mins plus. My spirit is seriously fighting with these human comments discrediting the book of enoch.This book was directly referred to in the bible. So the bible made a mistake by referring to it. Please be careful.
Angie Jefferys the book of Enoch was the first book of the Bible , for it to go into such detail about the creation and what went wrong and who brought sin and how it came to be wrongfully intertwine with mankind ! And for so many to quote scriptures from it .
Besides , why would the CREATOR , take him away if he was a lie or fairytale! I can’t see it with my eyes nor with my heart , the Book is for these times of deception!!!!
@@mysphthejazzien10 Enoch wasn't a lie or a fairytale. The Book of Enoch found in the Ethioptic bible is suspect because it differs from the fragments written in Aramaic that were found at Qumran. Also, the Book of Parables (1 Enoch) was not found at Qumran. The Ethioptic version is thought to have come about around the 15th century AD because of errors and writing styles.
On calender : The heavenly luminaries were given to correct those who followed exclusively a lunar calendar (which leads to at least 10 days of error per year), or those who followed exclusively a solar calendar (which would supplant the natural rhythm of life) - to set forth a firm calendar based on a solar-lunar system. Unfortunately, the purity of the earth’s orbit was not retained after the times of Yahusha ben Nun (Joshua), and the earth went from a 364 day year to a 365.2 day year Dr. S. Pigeon blog
The mention that Enoch did die later Hebrews 11:13 is taken way out of context. Read Hebrews 11:5-13 again for clarification. It’s talking about the people after Enoch that died, not Enoch himself.
When I was obtaining a Theology degree in the 80's, I took a class on the Psalms taught by a Jewish minister and this person had studied at a NY College for Rabbi training. Ask any competent Rabbi and he will inform you that there are 5 SEPARATE BOOKS OF THE PSALMS! WHEN YOU ADD THESE 5 TO THE REMAINING 65 BOOKS, YOU COME UP WITH 70 BOOKS OF THE BIBLE! 10 (JUDGMENT) X 7 (PERFECTION) = 70 BOOKS =THE INSPIRED WORD OF YHWH !
Nope! If you ask any competany rabbi he wil tell you that the are far less than 70 books. Ezra Nehamiah is considered one book. So is both first and second Kings. All the minor prophets are considered one book. So your "insight" is dung.
Just one addition, the bible didn't say that Enoch did die in Hebrews 11:13,It was referring to all who did die, but it clearly states that "he did not see death," the bible did point out all who died in the rest of Hebrews 11 and they named most of the previous individuals except Sara and Enoch. But we read about Sara's death in Genesis so. Just pointing that out. So I believe it's contrary to say he did not die but died afterwards.
what disturbs me is that, this book existed in the bible earlier on ..so by then the book was inspired by God..but 200 years later, why say it's not inspired by God ..
cohen cyrus Exactly. It’s man made religious bs as I call it. Evidence, which is required and two witnesses agree that Enoch, Jubilees for example are in two ancient Scripture versions. Dead Sea Scrolls and Ethiopian version. We have historians who said that those two books were Scripture. Pharisees and Rome eventually rejected them because it is pro Torah and Messianic. It goes against their religion. If people want to reject Enoch, Jubilees, then to be consistent, they should reject NT. I don’t recommend that. People should be consistent and stop cherry picking and trust in false scholars that reject Scripture entirely and then accept some of Scripture and contradicting themselves. Here is something fro you to think about. Yahudah (Jude) 1:6 quotes a passage from the Testament (assumption) of Mosheh (Moses). Should we reject Jude? I think not. I don’t get why supposed defenders of Scripture want to reject parts of Scripture but not reject letters. Letters are NOT technically the Scriptures. Yes, they quote and allude to the Scriptures. See how messed up religion is and the true adherents to Scripture are attacked the most.
You say Enoch couldn't have written the book because he quotes so much of the latter prophets after him , then you do not understand that God says He changes not , He is the same yesterday , today ,and forever ,He declares the End from the Beginning, That he is the first ,and The last , the beginning and the end .. That He ( God) is the Spirit of prophecy and Inspired men of God wrote the books
Judgement has already commenced at the cross. Enoch prophesies that the rebellious Angel's would be bound for 70 generations before they are judged. Some have observed that according to Luke's genealogy, there are 70 generations between Enoch and Yeshua. And if Enoch was the seventh generation from Adam, then Yeshua would be the 77th. If one understands the significance of the number 7 in the entire Bible, one should not dismiss such symbolic importance.
I find a lot of similarities between Job and Enoch, I’ve been curious if they had the same original author for a long time. Personally I’m a believer that Enoch was originally an inspired book and was rejected for its messianic content and ended up being badly copied and added to. Enoch has parts that IMHO have no basis outside of being Holy Spirit breathed
I think some people think Enoch 1 is decent, but 2 and 3 were added far later and may be full of speculation. I'm not sure though, haven't read it myself.
Chanok 104 I swear unto you, that in the shamayim the messengers remember you for good before the esteem of the Great One, and your names are written before the esteem of the Great One. 2 Be hopeful; for beforehand you were put to shame through ill and affliction; but now you shall shine as the lights of the shamayim, you shall shine and you shall be seen, and the doors of the shamayim shall be opened to you. 3 And in your cry, cry for judgment, and it shall appear to you; for all your tribulation shall be visited on the rulers, and on all who helped those who plundered you. 4 Be hopeful, and do not cast away your hopes, for you shall have great joy as the messengers of the shamayim. 5 What shall you be obliged to do? You shall not have to hide on the day of the great judgment and you shall not be found as sinners, and the eternal judgment shall be far from you for all the generations of the world. 6 And now, do not fear you righteous, when you see the sinners growing strong and prospering in their ways. Do not be companions with them, but keep far from their violence; for you shall become companions of the hosts of the shamayim. 7 And, although you sinners say, ''All our sins shall not be searched out and be written down,'' nevertheless they shall write down all your sins every day. 8 And now I show unto you that light and darkness, day and night, see all your sins. 9 Do not be wicked in your hearts, and do not lie and do not alter the Words of uprightness, nor charge with lying the Words of the Qodash Great One, nor take account of your idols; for all your lying and all your wickedness do not come forth in righteousness but in great sin. 10 And now I know this mystery, that sinners will change and pervert the Words of righteousness in many ways, and will speak wicked words, and lie, and practice great deceits, and write books concerning their words. 11 But when they write down truthfully all My Words in their languages, and do not change or diminish ought from My Words but write them all down truthfully - all that I first testified concerning them. 12 Then, I know another mystery, that books will be given to the righteous and the wise to become a cause of joy and uprightness and much wisdom. 13 ''And to them shall the books be given, and they shall believe in them and rejoice over them, and then all the righteous who have learned from them - all the paths of uprightness - shall be recompensed.'' Chanok 105 105:1 In those days, he says, “𐤉𐤄𐤅𐤄 will be patient and cause the children of the earth to hear. Reveal it to them with YOUR Wisdom, for YOU are their guides; and YOU are a reward upon the whole earth.” 2 “Until I and My Son are united with them forever in the upright paths in their lifetime and there shall be shalom unto you, rejoice, you children of Truth. Aman.”
Amen, how about this: The Ascension of Yeshayahu 3: 31 And they will make of *none effect the prophecy of the prophets which were before me,* and these my visions also will they make of none effect, in order to speak after the impulse of their own hearts.
It's obvious that your main concern is maintaining a 66 Book canon. Did you know that Jesus on two seperate occations and James also once quoted books outside of the accepted 66 books. Btw, Both Jesus and James when quoting those books called them " Scripture" Since Jesus Himself testifies of books outside of the 66 books, I'm gonna believe Jesus over you guys.
Anonymous which ones are they? I’d love to learn more! I’ve been weeding through so many “lost books” and I’m confused
I too am wary with how they came up with the 66 books.
The 1st book of Enoch is a big help for me in understanding some of the texts in the Bible
Didn't Jesus said that angels DO NOT have sex?
Didn't Jesus Himself said after His ressurection, that spirit doesn't have flesh and bones?
While we have angels who seduce the daughters of men, and had sex with them in the book of Enoch.
I know that Jude wrote about angels who walk outside of their boundary, but this could mean the demons aka the fallen angels.
In Jesus's time, there never were hybrids of angels and humans, and we have A LOT of demons and evil spirits work around.
If the fallen are real, then there should exist some hybrids in Jesus's time.
Because in the book of Enoch, there were hybrids.
But there weren't.
And MOST importantly,
Jesus is the Son of Man, not Enoch.
@Nicodemus Edwards
If you take the words of the Book of Enoch as truth,
and do not believe in Jesus's words, then there is nothing left to talk here.
@Nicodemus Edwards Alright then.
I think the first 15 minutes of this video really explains the history aspect well. I appreciate that you guys didn't come out like a hard hammer for or against it, but rather explained the historical backdrop, the reason Jesus and the disciples were familiar with the text and why it is different than the rest of accepted Holy Scripture. I appreciate the time you put into this video. It is nice to come across some well-presented information in a world of heavily opinionated teachings. Keep it up.
There were also two Enoch’s, Enoch the son of Jared is the Enoch that walked with God, not to be confused with Enoch the son of Cain
walked with god ? I thought Jacob broke gods Achilles heel and crippled god ,so god could not possibly walk
@@carmineredd1198 WHAT!!!! I refuse to believe that don't mix this with Greek mythology
Jacob wrestled with God and lost. God injured Jacob's hip and Jacob became Israel, who walked with a limp.
Alex Bailey actually both of you are wrong !!
Jacob wrestled with (some believe it refers to an angel) a divine being and did so all night and when the being told him to let go, Jacob said no! Not unless you bless me. And so, the being touched his hip and broke it and said his new name is Israel because he struggled with angels and prevailed with God
carmine redd sorry buddy you got that all the backwards
I don’t know if this was intentional, or if 119 ministries just did not read the entire book of Enoch, but they definitely left some very important details out and falsely accused the writer of claiming to be the messiah. I took their advice literally, “test everything”. It IS my responsibility and I have come to see this teaching on Enoch inaccurate. They spoke of one section from the book of Enoch, claiming that the writer is proclaiming himself the messiah. I believe that they were referencing 1 Enoch chapter 46. I highly encourage everyone to read it for themselves. It bothers me when people make up stuff so that they can take a definitive stand. Also, the argument about when it was written or the literature style, to me does not warrant a “this is a blasphemous book” stand. Why not take the stand of “we’re not 100% sure ourselves so we say read with extreme caution.
E X A C T L Y ... i agree 100% with you
I know you wrote this a long time ago, but I agree. Plus Enoch 1 was found in the Dead Sea scrolls, or at least fragments of it. Clearly it has to date earlier than these experts claim since it was found in a cave that was all dated as earlier.
If Jesus quoted Enoch as scripture then who is anyone who is a believer to say that Enoch is not a valid book. To say that is to say Jesus quoted from a false work. Does any believer really want to go there???
YES!!! ALL should read the work for themselves. It is a very heady work and one truly needs to know their scriptures before reading it.
I've read all3 Enochian books and Book 1 is the most accurate. Books 2 and 3 are adulterated IMHO and not trustworthy.
If Joshua and 2 Samuel refer to it then it should be considered a genuine work otherwise to say it's a false work is to then say the bible is promoting a false book.
We all need to use a little common sense and lots of prayers asking for discernment from the Holy Spirit when reading ANY work.
If I might:
1 Enoch has chapters about the 364 day calendar. THIS BOOK is the TRUE ENOCH.
2 ENoch (SLavonic) is an adulterated work which attempts (badly it does) to fit our actual solar year of 365 and 1/4 days [along with pagan Gregorian calendar months].
This is incorrect and there are other parts in it also that are suspect.
3 Enoch is more rabbinic commentary and leaves out crucial calendar info. ALSO -- [and this is just a prediction it is pointing to (YES....I'm going to say it) aliens.
Chapter 33 has text: "EACH ONE WITH THREE FINGERS"
Chapter 44 alludes to GRAY PEOPLE.
I have copious notes for all 3 books and various copies from different translators who published.
So far 1 Enoch (Ethiopian) is the correct one.
I hope that helps. IMHO stay away from the other two.
When does Jesus quote Enoch? I know Peter and Jude do, but we don't know if its the same version that is available through the Ethiopian church today. The parts of the book of Enoch found with the Dead Sea scrolls has some different words in it, not that it changes the meaning, but its not inerrant like the scriptures. I find Enoch useful for history and context.@@ateachableheart2649
Please add verse in the bible where " book of Enoch" is quoted. Not your opinion pls. Ppl lie all the time. I trust the bible. I dont have time for ppls opinion anymore
I,v learn so much from the book of Enoch how wonderful to know how God created each thing in time and how it has blessed me I am amazed at all the things I,v learned knowing God power and how amazing he is
Where can find the book of Enoch?
@@sollos2001 you can download it from the playstore.
guys just note that the book of Enoch says that he , Enoch, is the son of man, 99% truth can be 100% a deception, be careful
Amen!
The God Culture has a testing Enoch series wherein he DEFENDS it unlike 119 did here
Sheeeesh.....Thank God for the Holy Spirit, who leads to ALL Truth and Understanding. The FIRST Book of Enoch resonates as Truth in my Spirit, that is all I need.
You are bewitched ...
Rings true for me also. God bless.
I agree, the first one feel right to me the second one does not, at least not all of it, and haven’t even listened to the third. Heard it was not very trustworthy at all
The heart is deceitful above all things and desperately wicked.
5 Trust in the Lord with all thine heart; and lean not unto thine own understanding.
6 In all thy ways acknowledge him, and he shall direct thy paths.
7 Be not wise in thine own eyes: fear the Lord, and depart from evil.
Proverbs 3
Jude directly quotes the Book of Enoch in the New Testament. It is part of Ethiopian Canon, one of the oldest established churches. This book both elaborates on Genesis 6 and further solidifies the truth about the Earth, Sun, and Moon. I have no doubt why it was done away with.
Not really. Enoch for sure isn’t inspired. Unless you believe that human kind can bring forth with the angel kinds. Can humans also bring forth of the gorilla kind, horse and other animals?!
@@godloves9163 And it came to pass, when men began to multiply on the face of the earth, and daughters were born unto them,
That the sons of God saw the daughters of men that they were fair; and they took them wives of all which they chose.
And the LORD said, My spirit shall not always strive with man, for that he also is flesh: yet his days shall be an hundred and twenty years.
There were giants in the earth in those days; and also after that, when the sons of God came in unto the daughters of men, and they bare children to them, the same became mighty men which were of old, men of renown.
And GOD saw that the wickedness of man was great in the earth, and that every imagination of the thoughts of his heart was only evil continually.
And it repented the LORD that he had made man on the earth, and it grieved him at his heart.
@@zariahlafleurpowell7028 what’s your point? Sons of God are referring to as believers in God. Yes angels at some times have been referred to as sons of God, however, the New Testament is clear that angels CANNOT REPRODUCE and ARE NOT HUMAN 👉KIND👈. The Bible is clear that each kind can bring forth after THEIR OWN KIND. Is the angel kind the same as human kind?
@@godloves9163 no in fact there are different kinds of angles sons God is a family in Genisis it says let us make man in Our image. The arch Angel's are indeed sons of God arch over seer of the Angel's watchers of the Angels. Genisis 6 is a part of the bible that talks about the sons of God not humans at this point who hadn't been called into the God family yet. May God bless your study I'm just sharing what I've found it's ok if we believe different in our journeys to the one truth that God alone knows fully
@@zariahlafleurpowell7028 I did my research as well. People only imply it’s angels. Sorry it’s not spiritual angels, it’s either fleshly or not. There’s no hybrids. And yes there were giants in those days. Most of everything was giant, that’s the point. Genesis is showing the proof of giants because this is what our archeologists find today and can’t explain it except through the Bible lens. Giant reptiles aka dinosaurs, giant animals, giant insects. Hence why the bible says there were giants on the earth in those days.
I thank God that ancient B.C. scholars compiled the writings of Enoch and made them available in one concise document. Together, they give us a much better understanding of events that took place BEFORE the Great Flood... plus much more, of course. It is not relevant whether it is included in the "canon" or not. What is important is that we have available to us a greater understand of God's work that He has preserved for us over the centuries. "Study to shew thyself approved unto God, a workman that needeth not to be ashamed, rightly dividing the Word of Truth." The Book of Enoch is NOT a DIFFERENT truth, it only brings to light MORE understanding of the Scriptures. I thank God for that.
Like Dr Michael Heiser says, just because it's not in the Bible doesn't mean it's not important. The Old testament often quotes ancient literature and other books.
Praise Yah!!! It is a blessing to see so many individuals in the comment section dedicated to doing their own research and not just except the regurgitated talking points of uninformed men.
God is so good I felt this in my spirit praise yeshua
It’s simple to read the book of Enoch and prove it’s not valid.
Easy question:
Who deceived Eve?
The Bible says Lucifer…book of enoch says an angel named Gadriel…
So which one do you believe?
@@HajiStaxGaming First off, the Bible doesn't say Lucifer in reference to Satan. The only place where Lucifer appears is Isaiah 14:12 and the name means Light-Bringer and in this verse refers to King Nebuchadnezzar of Babylon.
And it never even says Satan in reference to the Serpent; the Serpent is merely the Serpent.
@@ZetaMagnus
Revelation 12:9
“And the great dragon was cast out, that old serpent, called the Devil, and Satan, which deceiveth the whole world: he was cast out into the earth, and his angels were cast out with him.”
Weird….I got this right out of Revelation. Maybe you should re-read it.
Literally says, “that old serpent, called the Devil, AND Satan.”.
So….please explain to me in greater detail how the serpent is merely the serpent but not called Satan.
@@ZetaMagnusyou must read your bible more carefully brother. You missing alot
It was a bunch of men that got together and decided what when into the bible we use today. People there are many Books ....
not at all answer to this choose to see new comments
I stopped in minute 4:22 and wrote a comment. Then I began to read other comments... evidently 119 is rejecting the Book of Enoch. Big mistake. The fact is it is so suspicious to me that the Catholic-Jews Bible is 66 books..... you get my point.
Catholic Jews books? The Jews only include the Old Testament. The Catholics include the apocrapha.
Actually I’ll argue you here on just this 66 book point. There’s a good reason why Jesus arrives on the 40th book of the Protestant Bible, it’s the end of the waiting period. There’s a good reason why the New Testament is 27 books too(3x3x3, the Cube number). 66 isn’t a bad number, 666 is a bad number.
That said, we agree, Enoch is originally inspired but there are errors added to the text. Most notably Chapter 22. Enoch is meant to be dissected by the Holy Spirit. Most but not all of it will pass the test. GOD Bless!
With all respect, your opinion about the content in the video does not come off as very trustworthy if you draw conclusions from only 4 minutes of watching and reading people's comments.
Watch it first and be patient to hear them out, or else you cant form a legitimate opinion.
@@amkr186 I have studied the matter and sometimes you grasp the point of the author earlier. Anyway, if you don’t agree with me, it’s ok. You might someday agree if you study the matter for some hundred hours. It takes time and humility to admit that we have been deceived.
@@cmorales5 Yes you are right in that one can grasp a point earlier, I am sorry.
I find that people arrive to very different conclusions depending on weather they derive information from the scriptures we know as the bible today or from these other sources. How come they would contradict? Those who use books like Enoch etc. will have different approaches to the appointed times and the calendar for instance. Any explanation? Do you believe the scriptures as we have them today have been altered?
God Bless to all Book of Enoch believers. I wish that somebody will open a church that will actually teach and preach about the Book Of Enoch.😊
There is nothing to teach it is all laid out clearly , anyone can read Enoch nowadays. But still they chose their own understanding and wisdom.
Shalom! Check out Parable of the Vineyard comprehensive Enoch study on TH-cam. 😊
So the bible is not enough.....
@@justinerasmus8725 Of course! But the Book of Enoch is part of the Bible
"Matthew 22:29 Jesus answered and said to them, “You are mistaken, not knowing the Scriptures nor the power of God. 30 For in the resurrection they neither marry nor are given in marriage, but are like angels of God in heaven" the only book talking about angel not given in marriage is enoch
But the one point I would say is that those are Angel's which are in heaven. Not fallen Angel's who desecrate themselves with man.
@@richardwhite6062 Well stated. The key statement is "but are like angels "in" heaven. Not the ones that got cast down to earth because of rebellion. This group is obviously going again the most high.
The people above made my point. But they are right, the angels left heaven and defiled themselves with women. In Matthew, they are "in" heaven.
Also, read Genesis Chapter 6. Nephalim=Giants
And Yeshua is the antithesis of the Nephilim, even though he too came down from the sky.
I don't agree that Hebrews 11:13 states that Enoch died. Hebrews 11:5 does clearly state that Enoch was taken by God, then verse 6 seems to give a breaking sentence that separates the thought, then comes back in verse 7 to continue the "by faith" segment. But I think verse 6 separates Enoch from the "all" the author bundles together in verse 13. Also, Jesus Himself quoted the Book of Enoch to the Pharisees and told them they err in not knowing the SCRIPTURES! So I really do not believe this was researched out biblically. Just my opinion. Blessings!
He has confused the Enoch from the Cain linage which is what most do when trying to contest the book of Enoch. There are 2 Enoch's & the Evil Enoch had many writings that are used to confuse the truth of GOD.
Enoch the son of Jared lived closely with god and was taken by god, Enoch the son of Cain died. These writings are believed to be from Enoch son of Jared
@Scott M Sykes Hebrews 11:5 does though.
Heb 11:5 - "By faith "Enoch" was translated so as not to see death, and "was not found, because God translated him." For before his translation, he had obtained witness to have been pleasing to God." ( see Gen. 5:24 ) (LITV)
"So as not to see death" - is very unambigious, that is very plain - Enoch didn't die.
I personally believe he will be one of the two witnesses of Revelation 11
I agree, i was going to say that but its speaking more of abraham, and noah, not enoch when it says these men died... because the bible clearly states enoch did not taste death: we have to be 2 timothy 2:15 studiers! To rightly divide the Word of truth! God bless you!
Hebrews 11:13 does not say Enoch died.
I believe Enoch will experience death along with Elijah. Revelation illustrates two prophets in the end times that cannot be harmed until God allows it. I believe those two prophets are Enoch and Elijah brought back to finish their work.
That is a really interesting point you're making! Wow, never thought of that. That could very well be...
Was john the baptist not Elijah? how can he come back again?
@@ricoparadiso I'm not exactly sure what you are asking. What we read in scripture is that John the Bapist was Jesus' cousin. He was his own man. Elijah is a completely different person. Elijah was a prophet about 850 years before Christ was born. The scriptures tell us that Elijah, like Enoch was taken by God. Those are the only two individuals in the Bible that mention being taken by God and not dying. In accordance to God's plan He will bring Elijah and Enoch back to be prophets in the end times. Revelation mentions the two prophets who can't be touched/hurt until He allows it, I just believe (because of the reasons I just mentioned) that it is Elijah and Enoch. If the "bringing them back" part seems hard to believe just remember that Jesus raised Lazarus from the dead, keeping in mind that Lazarus was actually dead compared to Elijah and Enoch who didn't die.
@@ricoparadiso John the Baptist was murdered by Herod, Elijah was transformed. Elijah will surely come back
Mark 9:2-30
And after six days Jesus taketh with him Peter, and James, and John, and leadeth them up into an high mountain apart by themselves: and he was transfigured before them.
And his raiment became shining, exceeding white as snow; so as no fuller on earth can white them.
And there appeared unto them Elias with Moses: and they were talking with Jesus.
And Peter answered and said to Jesus, Master, it is good for us to be here: and let us make three tabernacles; one for thee, and one for Moses, and one for Elias.
For he wist not what to say; for they were sore afraid.
@@seapanther53 You are very right.
the book of Enoch is one of the scriptures which was meant for the end times only the wise will understand it not the foolish. This guy did not do enough research he listens the words of men then rely on the Holy Spirit.The book of Enoch is the word of G-D. The earth is flat just as it says do not listen to man who obey satan the evil one.He is the great deceiver who deceives the whole earth.May Yeshua guide and bless all who read His word, Amen
I have to disagree with you on this one jeffsr2222
You must be real wise then ... Professing themselves to be wise, they became fools, Romans 1 22 KJV
You are bewitched by the synagogue of satan
@@brucedressel8873 putting words in his mouth? He didn't profess himself to be wise.
Enoch is NOT the Messiah!
Sorry. You just aren’t accurate. It was quoted in the Bible and evidence suggest Jesus was familiar with it and it probably predates all the other books. Daniel even references a book that was for future believers in the end times. Enoch (through about the first 54 chapters) fits this prophecy perfectly. It was also found with the Dead Sea scrolls and new manuscript translations matched the older ones found with the scrolls.
When were the Dead Sea Scrolls discovered?
It seems that book was Revelation.
Jude. Quoted in Jude. Jewish tradition supports it. One of the oldest surviving Christian Cultures (Ethiopia) and many small orthodox Christian sects still have the Book of Enoch in their cannon. Read it and it’s apparent why the Jesuits would want to remove it from modern translations.
I believe there are sufficient evidence that warrants a more thorough examination of the evidence. To throw the writing out, is a mistake. I think we are going to find out very soon how real the Nephilim really are.
@@franklinmc4457 The Nephilim were real as stated in Torah. There is no need for the book of Enoch to understand this fact. The book of Enoch is not inspired by YHVH. If you read the Torah you get enough information on giants, angels, and their interactions with men and women to be aware.
Question everything, and do not let the hyper-religious self proclaimed gurus sway your love for Jesus. Jesus hates religion
You are going to lead yourself into deception trying to challenge Gods Word by adding falsehoods
Jesus does not hate religion my friend, read the book of James : "Pure religion and undefiled before God and the Father is this, To visit the fatherless and widows in their affliction, and to keep himself unspotted from the world."
James 1:27 (kjv)
God bless you brother
(Ps: God does hate wickedness and deception, which is what FALSE religions are, there is only one true religion because there is only one true God 😁) have a blessed weekend!
When 119 is confident they know something, they block comments on their videos. When they question themselves, they open up the comments section to allow people to change their minds. This video is great evidence of that. And 119 ministries is very wrong on this video. The book of Enoch is very accurate.
This man is pissing me off comparing the Book of Enoch to the wizard of Oz
Enoch walked with Yahweh and Enoch walked for 365 year of age. Enoch didn't die Yahweh took Enoch to heaven.
He needs to read the Bible and the book of Enoch again
@@jessicamatlock6786 If what you say is true, then Jesus was a false Messiah. Jesus said in John 3:13 "No man ascendeth up to heaven, but he who came down from heaven". Jesus was the one who came down from heaven, therefore NO OTHER MAN can ascend into heaven, except Jesus. This either proves you to be wrong in your Enoch interpretation, or it proves Jesus to be a liar and a false Messiah. Which one do you think is most likely? Scripture actually uses the word "translated" and not "taken" to describe what happened to Enoch. Enoch was translated to heaven. Heaven is a spiritual relm NOT A FLESHLY relm for men. Its very clear Enoch was "translated" into the spirit in order to be taken into heaven. Your mistranslation has turned Jesus into a liar.
@@mattyice3036 prophet Elijah ascended to heaven also.
2 Esdras 14:44
In forty days they wrote two hundred and four books.
So the Bible is not 66 or 87 books, there are so many books went missing, ELOYHM/YHUH is not author of confusion but of peace, ... 2 Timothy 3:16
You have to be more careful with that assumption because some books require multiple scrolls such as Isaiah, Psalms, and Enoch.
@@crutherfordmusic Show me in the American canon of 66 the verse that says to canonize 66 scrolls?
You are a classic Bible doubter ... Ever learning, and never able to come to the knowledge of the truth. 2 Timothy 3 7 KJV
@@4ucmikey 🔥💥⚡👍🏿
I see no reference to Enoch in Matthew.
Matthew 22
29 Jesus answered and said unto them, Ye do err, not knowing the scriptures, nor the power of God.
30 For in the resurrection they neither marry, nor are given in marriage, but are as the angels of God in heaven.
How difficult would it be, I wonder, for the devil to twist scripture to his own ends? Is Enoch quoted in Jude, or Jude quoted in Enoch? Now the Spirit speaks expressly that in the latter times some shall depart from the faith, giving heed to seducing spirits, and doctrines of devils; And I fear that as the serpent beguiled Eve through his subtlety, so your mind will be corrupted from the simplicity that is in Christ.
Tempting, this new knowledge is - these new books - secret until now... hidden... the new truths we now have. Don't they taste good!
Jesus is the way, the truth and the life. There is only one way to the King, and it is narrow. If reading Enoch helps you get to know Jesus, good for you! But remember, no lie is of the truth.
I personally think every mature believer grounded in Scripture should read Enoch prayerfully. I have benefited greatly from it in my understanding of Genesis. It has also changed the way I view world history and the history of God's people. It goes into detail about what the fallen angels were doing and how genetic mad science and sorcery was introduced to mankind. It also gives more context as to why we have all of these same creatures showing up in mythology and lore all across the globe; things like mermaids, dragons, giants, goblins, minotaurs, fairies, centaurs, werewolves, shapeshifters, bigfoot, UFOs and aliens. All these creatures trace their origins back to some kind of supernatural source which we know as the fallen angels who wanted to create their own reality on earth in rebellion to God.
As it was in the days of Noah so shall it be in the days of the coming of the son of man. The reason why I believe what Enoch says is because I am seeing the same things come back nowadays, the way people are playing with genetics and even the human soul. And the way sorcery and all kinds of demonic doctrines are coming more to the forefront and even being taught to children in schools. The way the basics of natural order like gender is being rejected in favor of creating our own false realities, that means we can have sex with anything and everything just like the people did before the flood. This opens the door to sex with demons which will create all kinds of problems.
I believe these extra details presented in Enoch will help protect God's people even more from deception because we have a better idea of what to look out for.
Very well said.
@@ljsultan229 thank you, God bless
I also believe that enoch should be studied
Thank you for sharing this.I personally found this very long and a lot to take in all in one go. I Believe in The Heavenly Father And In Jesus Christ and The Holy. Spirit.I do Believe Enoch and need to study this for myself with the Help of The Holy Spirit. Amen.
Well said..uts all we need to do..take in everything, dismiss all religious dogmatic religions..go to our lord Jesus CHRIST only,,rinse repeat..to our lord for holy discernment!
The book of enoch does not lead to the teachings of Jesus Christ so there is no Truth , way or life there for you.
The book of Enoch exposes the lies of Satan. The satanists could not control the whole earth through fear, if the people of the Earth depend on Yehovah. They had to come up with lies about Yehovah's creation and how insignificant mankind is. For this, first they got rid of Yehovah's witness in the Book of Enoch. Then they started the propaganda mechanism with NASA, Media and Pseudo Science. Pray to Yehovah to remove the scales over our eyes created by false propaganda, so that we can understand the truth. And the truth shall set us free from the evil clutch of satan.
@@zoegrace1031 explain to me how satellites work and weather satellites etc. Please don’t start with the flat earth ignorance.
@@zoegrace1031 The Book of Enoch IS mostly the Lies of Satan. None of it is useful history of what happened before the Flood.
This book attracts to the itching ears
Not really, that’s why most of the church rejects it; which should tell you something. The majority is often wrong and misguided
Apostle Jude is a reliable man of Christ and of The Father in Heaven. He clearly mentioned "Enoch Seventh from Adam". It is at his precise words when he quoted (Jude 1:14-15) verse from the Book of Enoch (1:9) both are parallel. This is full well enough Enoch's scripture was indeed inspired. Jude knew it, and hypocrites don't.
Grow up and dig a little deeper to understand the full picture. Listen to the entire video and read some entire articles ok this topic. You are just cherry picking and ignoring what you don't like. YOU are the hypocrite.
everyone all answer to this choose to see new comments
We can jump around all day but only one verse matters here.
2 Timothy verses 16-17
"All scripture is given by inspiration of God, and is profitable for doctrine, for reproof, for correction, for instruction in righteousness"
What I find astounding is that people don't have any spiritual discernment . In the New testament Jesus teaches us about demons. The book of Enosh explains where the demons came from. Most the books in the new testament contain word for word references from the book of Enosh.
Jacobus Van der Merwe I really can say, I didn’t understand the difference between demons and fallen angels until reading Enoch. Demons come from dead Nephilim. Even one of the words used for demons is also talking about Nephilim, the Rephaim. I asked a guy from Israel, “what is a Rephaim?” He said demon, although in the Bible the first appear as Giants, then later as demons and the inhabitants of the underworld.
@@spitflamez yes the angels had sex with the daughters of men and their offspring were giants. When these giants died because they were born on the earth they became demonic spirits. The original 200 angels that decided to cohabit with woman are bound till judgement day.
@@jacobusvandermerwe1922 Regarding Enoch, some doubters get caught up on certain words and passages in Enoch, just like in Jubilees and Jasher. They get too caught up on things that appear out of line or incorrect and start assuming the entire book is false or something. People who do that are not understanding by the spirit, instead, they may gain some understanding then listen to "scholars" who have there own agenda to debunk the text, then this cycle continues on and on. Jesus will soon make things clear to all.
Demons are evil spirits not angels
@@kervinrobinkneshoa7213 the book of Enoch explains this the angels that sinned in Genius 6 took daughters of men and slept with them their children became giants. When these giants were killed they became demons or evil spirits. They were told to remain on earth as they were made on the earth
Thanks Jon. Be Blessed.
All ways Enjoy Elohim !
Interestingly, the Book of Enoch was quoted by all the apostles in the NT. If that weren't enough, Jesus quotes it without hesitation, including calling Himself the Son of Man time after time, just as Enoch speaks of Him, time after time, in his book.
Book of Ezekiel also, 92 times I think you'll find "son of man" addressed to Ezekiel.
All i can say is the book of enoch makes me change my life totally,when i read how enoch petition for the fallen angels and God rejected all 200,it teaches me that we take Sin too lightly and think that as we say Lord forgive us we are forgiven,i cried ,i got scared,these now a days pastors only interested in money,they don't preach hell and holiness
You can get the same moral from the canon Bible.
It was found with the dead sea scrolls.
Or way more accurately called Gnostic desert discards ...
yeah this 119 ministries dude is a false teacher. pretty foolish
he has zero original thoughts he uses other authors to discredit and describe texts in the best way he thinks/assumes. I cant take him seriously at all
@@brucedressel8873 🤣 you're a fool. and have fallen for the beast system aka Roman Central Currency through the Vatican and they couldn't do anything because the Dead Sea scrolls were hidden for a reason
all kinds of writings were also found with the biblical scriptures. This does not prove or disprove Enoch as canon.
119 failed to test Enoch properly.
Agreed
YEP!
Agreed, just like what he said Enoch died in Hebrews 11:13. I didn’t read as such that Enoch died ...maybe they had other interpretations that I don’t understand?
Jude is included in the Bible, he spoke of Enoch he wasn’t mocked for it. After, Paul spoke Enoch to the Jews in Hebrews He was inspired by the Lord. Are we to say we can’t trust Paul writing that Enoch was translated?? Yet these are saying they trust some scholar instead??? Or doctrines of men? Are we not to test all things with the Bible? Would their not be warnings against trusting in Enoch or maybe just not mentioned at all? I have seen other videos on this ch. & am seeing the same pattern of choosing scripture to their interpretation and making it sound like there is no way to think otherwise than what they are presenting.
DANGEROUS! BEWARE & BE AWARE!!
That's why the bible says the Holy Spirit well lead you in all truth,!! Not intellectualism will lead you into all truth read flag number one!!
Spiritual truth i think this is literally just a rouse to bring out the anger and evil these guys cant be this serious. They test nothing and are taught these things and cant re kearn their way around it i have tried to talk to these kind of channels with the same end everytime they speak their brliefs and refuse or spiritually are blind to it and until they come to Jesus they will stay this way. I try to speak to other channels and go back and forth on scripture and i always end up amazed they will not hear what the scripture says. I hope that if nothing else it plants the Seed
Well they also say adults would eventually become circumcised, completely obliterating what Paul warns in Galatians.
However- Jew and Gentile are to become one flesh. Worship on the same days, set apart by God, and eat the same foods, not grieving one another.
The Spirit will lead to all truth, and the Spirit will lead to Torah and how God always wanted to circumcise our hearts.
Elwood M. Buel well what is required of gentiles in the Torah and what was taken away with Jesus. Like the feasts did anyone get Leaven out of their house and have perfect unspotted lamb for dinner and make sure that none of it remain in the morning. Or is Jesus the Perfect Lamb that and to celebrate it would just be remembering our sins yr to year that can never be judged by food or feast say. 🙏🏼Romans 6:6knowing this, that our old man was crucified with Him, so that the body of sin might be annulled, that we are no longer enslaved to sin. 7For the one having died has been freed from sin.
8Now if we died with Christ, we believe that we will also live with Him, 9knowing that Christ, having been raised up out from the dead, dies no more. Death no longer rules over Him. 10For that which He died, He died to sin once for all; but that which He lives, He lives to God. 11So also you, consider yourselves to be dead indeed to sin, but living to God in Christ Jesus. 🙏🏼👉this is the Berean Literal which matches to original greek best. Notice the term “old man” this is also the same reference as the Parable of the Wineskins. Which is about the Old & New Covenants. Which is also in the story of the Wedding where Jesus turned water to wine and that He Brings the Good Wine now. Sorry this is long but since Christ.Truther and Parable of th Vine. Blocked me and my second ch. The people will choose their own paths. And if they believe they have hidden truths the all will fall into the ditch. As for the Torah one easy Scripture answers that John 6: 28Therefore they said to Him, “What must we do, that we may be doing the works of God?”
29Jesus answered and said to them, “This is the work of God, that you should believe in Him whom He has sent.” 🙏🏼this is also why it is important to have Faith in Salvation where if you are bringing the Gospel the Torah is not there. Why a man can accept Jesus in his death bed seconds before his death. Hiw can one be saved in this manner with the Torah? Seek truth in the New Covenant and you will find it
The Bible also quotes various non Christians. Should they be considered doctrine too then by your logic
I really appreciate your review on the books of Enoch, Jubilee and Jasher. If I had read them before listening to your testing, I would have read them in error. I would have believed them to be valid, I appreciate how you use the Canon of God's scripture as your ultimate authority. Thank you for testing The book of Enoch may God bless you. Shalom!
WRONG! WRONG! WRONG!!! TEST the books for yourself but be forewarned! You had better know your bible inside and out FIRST. THATY is the ONLY WAY to test those written works and they have MERIT. SHAME on anyone who says otherwise becaue in their railings of false works, they ERR and expose themselves as untrustworthy.
The 3 books of Enoch are extraordinary!
@@gravityfallscanada how?
@@LuminousTwinHearts
I retract my statement. After 2 years of research I have concluded that all three books of Enoch are scripturally based and are the first three of the 360 books that he wrote.
Thus said 𐤉𐤄𐤅𐤄, “Cursed is the man who trusts in man and makes flesh his arm, and whose heart turns away from 𐤉𐤄𐤅𐤄. For he shall be like a shrub in the desert, and not see when good comes, and shall inhabit the parched places in the wilderness, a salt land that is not inhabited. Happy is the man who trusts in 𐤉𐤄𐤅𐤄, and whose trust is 𐤉𐤄𐤅𐤄. For he shall be like a tree planted by the waters, which spreads out its roots by the river, and does not see when heat comes and his leaf shall be green, and in the year of drought he is not anxious, nor does he cease from yielding fruit.”
“The heart is crooked above all, and desperately sick - who shall know it? I, 𐤉𐤄𐤅𐤄, search the heart, I try the kidneys, and give every man according to his ways, according to the fruit of his deeds.”
Yirmeyahu (Jeremiah) 17:5-10
What translation you got that from ?
You have a few word that's been changed,it seems.
Shalom ⚔️
@@powerplay4real174 I use a few as a baseline, but translate most words directly, or confirm them, before sharing, to the best of my ability. I have not found a translation without error.
Let Yah be true and every man a liar!! HalleluYAH for the Ruach hakodesh and truly a baruch to see the body of who are being led in discernments comments and trusting in our Father alone!! Enoch the prophet as Jude said is just that a prophet!
“Since the day that your fathers came forth out of the land of Egypt unto this day I have even sent unto you all my servants the prophets, daily rising up early and sending them: Yet they hearkened not unto me, nor inclined their ear, but hardened their neck: they did worse than their fathers.”
Jeremiah 7:25-26 KJV
Our understandings only comes from one teacher in truth the Ruach hakodesh for no longer will a man have to teach his neighbor. Regardless if we have not been led to the same understanding at the time we love each other and pray for each other and be thy brothers keepers!! For there are always going to be different parts of one body and milk and meat, and babes and elders yet a house divided cannot stand!! Paul before the road to Damascus was in erred understanding yet one of the elect and we are all in erred understanding each day to not rely on our own wisdom for we learn as a child of Yah daily and only emuwnah “faith” is credited as righteousness!! Shalom and love fam.
If Enoch was with God then he could have seen what happened at mt Sinai. Am I correct! God knows all things and angels can see from above so how is that not true too.
Yes! the first section of 1 Enoch describes God showing himself to the people of Israel at Sinai and it describes the covenant that God made with his people and declares that God keeps that same covenant. The rest of the bible agrees and shows time after time how God keeps those same promises with his people.
They are so bias they erased my comment because I challenged them and I was not inappropriate in anyway they are like Facebook fact checkers, very sad, they are not genuinely interested in the validity or not of the book of Enoch they are just trying to wash their hands so they don’t lose any reputation by endorsing it in anyway
Enoch was not an angel. The Bible never states that Enoch went to Heaven, just that he was saved from death. If you believe scripture, Yeshua says specifically:
John 3:13
“No one has ascended into heaven except he who descended from heaven, the Son of Man.”
This verse should shut all discussion down about the topic of Heaven. Elijah was transported to another place, we know this because he sends a letter to Jehoram. All of the prophets talk about going to sleep in the dust, nothing mentioning going to heaven and looking down on the sorrows of this world or being an angel. David is said to be “sleeping with his fathers” it mentions nothing of going to heaven.
@@soloscriptura7451 Did not Jesus tell the thief on the cross, "Today thou shalt be with me in paradise?" Is not paradise heaven? So in other words, Jesus told the thief he would be WITH JESUS in paradise.
@@zjmtnvols nothing in scripture indicates that he went to Heaven. He was telling him he was redeemed for believing in him, therefore the law of sin and death does not apply to him. I’ll pay you to show me anywhere in scripture it says “such in such is in Heaven” besides Yeshua. You won’t find it, because it’s not there. Shalom.
This is a clear teaching of the deception of The Book of Enoch and I thank you for sharing this video here on youtube. It is so important for us as Christians to test everything and I am
thankful that I found it:)
Karen go read the book like Jesus, Jude and Peter did.... as they all quote directly from it...
@@herbis1 They quote a few verses NOT the message of the Book. They used it as an analogy for readers that were familiar with Enoch, must as current pstors might make a Star Wars or Lord of the Rings reference they know that their listeners will understand. This does NOT make the whole Book true. DUH!
Dude, this book explains Genesis and Revelations. It confirms the bible and the bible has confirmed this book in different parts.
But again couldn't this book just have copied these and tried to explain it with the theory it saw fit ? I mean read chap 70 of the book of enoch, the messiah is revealed to be him!
Dude it says enoch is the Messiah. This book is blasphemous. Should be burned. All glory to Y-shua the Messiah and He is the Eternal G-d forever!
I think that's a bit of a stretch, it is just a historical book influencing culture of the time of Christ, doesn't make it inspired scripture, but a good reference to understand the culture and thinking of the time.
Not more not less... it just is.
@@stephaniejazzy7359 not at all sister it doesn’t say that, that’s what Enoch heard it doesn’t mean the Angels were talking about him, is a miss interpretation. Enoch is absolutely messianic glorifies Jesus Christ and it doesn’t contradict any doctrine of the Bible these 119 guys they are just simply very bias, they have a lot to loose if they seem to endorse it, they are not genuinely interested in the book’s possible validity.
@@tendernessforthemonster4517 m
I read this quote and immediately I understood that it was (Christ, Jesus) that spoke to Enoch so I'm going to interject the meanings that this word says to me!
"And the Head of Days (Christ, Jesus) came with Michael and Raphael and Gabriel and Phanuel and thousands and tens of thousands of angels without number. And he (Christ, Jesus), came to me and greeted me with his voice and said to me, "You, (Juan), (this is my name) (are), (Of course I question this "are" here in parenthesis), that Son of Man, (Didn't God call Jeremiah Son of Man a few times?), who was born for righteousness (In Christ Jesus aren't we all born for righteousness?), and righteousness dwells on you, (Isn't Christ indwelling in makes me the righteousness of God in Him?) and the righteousness of the Head of Days, (Christ, Jesus) will not forsake you."
(Didn't Jesus Christ say that He would never leave me or forsake me?)
Now my question is, wherein this phrase did Enoch usurp authority and became Christ other than Christ in him (Enoch). Enoch's role was to act like Christ as His representative in the role he was called to do and that's why God took him! Because Enoch did his job right!
Don't throw the baby out with the bathwater! Paul says to take the good and throw out the bad!
The Ethiopian Cannon has Enoch as Cannon and I believe The Cannon is like 800 years older.
So, We must have to throw the scroll of Ezekiel and his prophecies out, too, then.
Rise up, oh Son of Man and Hear.
Rise Up! As the google algorithms will also bow down and confess the name of The Son of Man!
@Paul kept the Sabbath Acts 18:4
Lol this is the same video that uses Hebrews 11:13 to prove that Enoch died?
Try some reasearch dude, it's sad to say but this channel isn't the same anymore...
Keep doubting and keep looking ... Ever learning, and never able to come to the knowledge of the truth. 2 Timothy 3 7 KJV
@@brucedressel8873
No point he deleted his comment I guess there are some people who will never learn...
@@gravityfallscanada,
Wow.
Members of the Church of Jesus Christ of latter-day Saints don't accept the books Enoch as canon. We do however have additional scriptures about him, but not derived from the apocrypha. Moroni is pronounced Mor-OH-nye, btw.
I confirm the Book of Enoch is NOT cannon and is considered apocryphal. Also, we are NOT an " end times community" any more than other deciples Jesus Christ.
Up until now I thought 119ministries was pretty knowledgeable smh.....bad research or maybe they needed something to put up quick.
It takes time no
Very bias and they just simply don’t believe, they just analyze superficially, all Christian “leaders” have a lot to loose if they more than endorse Enoch, however in the book there is a wealth of knowledge and revelation that doesn not contradict doctrine.
Enoch was a prophet, he was given supernatural revelation from God, Noah had the Enoch book on the arc. Lies!
Enoch contradicts scriptures it says that Yeshua received his name later in life which is blasphemy
@@manwhoplayswithe3101
What!? 😂😂😂 That isn't in the book of Enoch dude...
You can't prove the book of Enoch was on the Ark. Im not disproving the book..But it was written by another author..Read it carefully, someone Its telling a story..
@@fra365
Lol same thing for the Gospel of Matthew and the book of Hebrews, you're argument is invalid...
@@gravityfallscanada I take everything with a grain of salt...I don't believe everything in the bible is inspired because it was written by different authors and manipulated throughout the ages by jews & Christians to promote their agenda and exert control. I think the bible & the book of Enoch tell a great story about our past, our future and our creator. Should i apply a critical thought process?....My answer is yes..You are entitled to your own opinion, just as i am.
i thank you, 119 ministries, for your perspective on enoch. the calendar in enoch is interesting. the jews keep the lunar calendar for the moedim which seems illogical and not scriptural. i have heard even the jews know something is off with their calendar. well, we all do the best we can to serve our Creator. may Yahuah bless 119 ministries!
Searth the Enoch calendar.
chemtrailmary said "the jews keep the lunar calendar for the moedim which seems illogical and not scriptural". HAVE YOU EVEN READ THE SCRIPTURES? Psalms 104:19 "He appointed THE MOON for moedim"! It literally says the lunar calendar was for MOEDIM! quit spreading lies
@@brenosantana1458 while the Qumran calendar is so very close, they have ERRED in the beginning of how to calculate it. Sad but true.
The true calendar is Sabbath FRAMED. Rabbi Jonathan Sacks (may his soul rest in peace) showed me this truth in one of his precious books, but I could tell he had no clue about it at the time of the writing. In fact, he knew things without knowing them, if you can receive that. His books are chocked full of wisdom and nuggets.
@@mattyice3036 WRONG. The Judaic lunar calendar system was brught in by posers who fled form Babylon along with Judah to come back to Israel.
I'm pretty sure you won't like hearing that but if you do your homework you'd already know this.
The bible speaks of this in Esther. SMH......Abba !! Please help your Children to KNOW YOUR TRUTH!!!
@@ateachableheart2649 How so? In your opinion.
I own the Paul C. Schneiders version and It doesn't say (in Enoch 71:13-14) that Enoch is the Son of Man. I always feel like so many people misquote apocryphal books. I was hoping that this man would put my mind at ease and convince me that there are only 66 valid books and everything else is a fraud (that would make life so much easier) but the more I look into it... the more I see that these books are valid. Maybe not canonical but definitely valid or at the very least credible.
@saulcruz87 - Both Enoch and the book of Jubilees tell us that man will make errors regarding the years, months, weeks and days.
Keeping an open mind to study these "controversial" books, IMHO is proof of a seeker of truth. In my own experience, it seems we are on a mission to mine out nuggets of truth, or call them pieces of the big picture puzzle. Sometimes, it only takes finding that one piece for the picture to make sense.
I firmly believe that many authentic works that contain truth have been kept from us and only the ones that serve an agenda have been allowed to be given to us and not in an incorrupt way, but certain words are changed to change the very meaning and understanding of the verse in question and since it doesn't match the context of surrounding verses, it can cause confusion which then makes the student give up. A very ingenious way for the devil to keep one from knowing the truth. I could share how this began with the Hebrew language, but it's too long to share here.
The bottom line is this:
NO ONE should let these "inconsistencies" keep them from the basic simple FAITH of Jesus Christ.
So sad they are bashing the Book Of Enoch, Hosea 4:6 "My people are being destroyed because they don’t know me. Since you priests refuse to know me, I refuse to recognize you as my priests. Since you have forgotten the laws of your God, I will forget to bless your children."
Book of Enoch 5.8 When wisdom is given to the chosen they will all live, and will not again do wrong, either through forgetfulness or through pride. But those who possess wisdom will be humble. 5.9 They will not again do wrong, and they will not be judged in all the days of their life, and they will not die of wrath or anger. But they will complete the number of the days of their life. And their life will grow in peace, and the years of their joy will increase in gladness and eternal peace; all the days of their life.
The Book itself is for the Bible and Pro-God!
Well, I didn't realize you all opened the comment sections of your videos up for iron-sharpening-iron discussions B-) I do commend you for this, and I pray Truth Seekers can learn to discuss these things in love (these types of discussions/studies help us to "grow in love") ;-) I need to watch this vid, but I do have thoughts on the luminary chapters of Enoch as it relates to the concept to Time and/or to putting Genesis 1:14 in action. Stay tuned, and I will let you know my thoughts on your thoughts ;-) Shalom Friends B-)
Faith Child we’ll see how long the comment section stays on. Lately when too many people disagree with their teachings, they will turn off Likes and Comments.
Congrats, another poorly researched video by 119 ministries:-(
Will the real Jew go lay out in that white hot 🌞 black hold 🌞😁.
poorly researched? if you cannot refute their argument, you have no argument. I myself have the book of Enoch but I dont know enough to make claims like yours.
forget my comment. just finished watching the video.....its ugh
@@marshapple i have to agree this is a poorly researched video
It is very powerfull how the Holy Spirit leads us to Wisdom.
The Holy Spirit and flesh (Mary mother of Jesus) created the ONLY begotten son of God = Jesus Christ. Angels and humans cannot procreate as angels are spirits and humans are flesh. Do you see the problem here? believing angels and humans can have children takes away the Truth of Jesus Christs Unique birth.
@@randallblann1416 I beg your pardon Randall. God bless
God protected us from tornadoes last night.
@@jessicabates1223 There were giants in the earth in those days; and also after that, when the sons of God came in unto the daughters of men, and they bare children to them, the same became mighty men which were of old, men of renown. The first mention of "sons of God" in the Hebrew Bible occurs at Genesis 6:1-4.
@@jessicabates1223 In Job 38:7 the “sons of God” are angels too! In Job 38 God is speaking to Job and reviewing how the universe was created. In verse 4 God asks Job if he was present when God laid the foundation of the world. Verses 5 and 6 are more questions about the creation. Then verse 7 asks if Job was present when the stars sang and the “sons of God” shouted for joy. Again “sons of God” refers to the holy angels who existed at the time of the creation.
Love your work, however this presentation was troublesome to me...
Did Jesus use terms found in Enoch in referring to himself? Is Enoch an end time prophet? Why did you choose the translation you sourced? Did the Essene Community become the first Christians?
You presented hypothesis and assumptions based on only one side of the narrative.
It would be extremely interesting to have you present an opposite view citing different sources
or to have a yeshiva style debate that would allow the listeners to determine their own conclusions.
Diane Essenes were pagan. It’s frustrating how people rewrite history. That’s like saying whites were the first Americans. They were not. Nowhere in Dead Sea Scrolls are Essenes mentioned. This guy is a typical false teacher who panders to Juda-ism religion and x-tian religion also. The actual “early Christians” or assembly never doubted or rejected Enoch. It was not until the 5th century CE. Rome rejected it and pseudo (protesting) Romans do also, except for some people who identify as x-titans. More people are realizing Enoch is Scripture and the historical and prophetic implications.
Pm פיטרוש מיכאל talking like that will get the comments section turned off on this video 🤫 😂😂
YAHUAH YAHUSHA Fine. Then he can lose viewers and money...He is a false teacher.
Pm פיטרוש מיכאל it wasn’t always like this, seems like there was a recent change to the crap they have been putting out lately.
Paul kept the Sabbath Acts 18:4 It does not say that and is that you? Go preach in a church and not here ok.
After seeing this I'm still unsure. Not leaning towards anyone view [lean more toward scripture.] But what I'm saying is I'm open to the possibility of enoch being reliable right now due to my little understanding of Torah. I'm praying that Yah will make it clear in the days moving forward.
You are right to be wary. The book of Enoch is promoted and sold on many occult web sites. Ask yourself why. Do your own search.
To deny this book as scripture would be tantamount to calling Jude (among others in the scriptures) a liar. We would in fact be calling God a liar. Jude quotes from this very book. Jude also called Enoch a prophet. He also gives him antiquity (with his lineage). Jude preached from this mans book to his congregation. Jude never would have taken the liberty to say such things if they were not true. God loved this man so much that He took Him to live with Him in heaven. This is a prime example of why John said in 2nd John 20 & 21 Knowing this first, that no prophecy of the scripture is of any private interpretation. For the prophecy came not in old time by the will of man: but holy men of God spake as they were moved by the Holy Ghost. Like any men or women of today, you have been taught by the same ones that Jesus warned us about. The false teachers. The nephilim's educational system (now called the seminary). I would urge you to consult God on this matter. The holy spirit is the only way to the truth. Not man. May God bless you with His truth that you may see with both eyes, and hear with both ears.
Amen.
If the Book of Enoch has no significance, why did God tell me to bring it to people's attention over eight years ago...I had never even heard of it, until He told me about it...
It's valid, 2 Esdras 14:44, 2 Timothy 3:16, 1 Corinthians 14:33
@@alkebul_art4690 thank you so much...
Because the Holy Spirit is leading you, not the doctrines of men. Holy Spirit told me the same thing. You are in good company.
@@EarthtoSpiritWarrior Amen to that my friend!!!...
@@glendamalmstrom3717 !!HUGS!!
We think we are so smart. If they were in the dead sea scrolls, its good enough for me
A lot of things are in the dead sea scrolls, but it doesn't mean that all of them equates to Scripture. During the time of the Essenes, the Tanakh structure of the Old Testament had already been firmly established and that is the Scripture for them. Now speaking of which, the dead sea scrolls undeniably contains many writings which does express some truth to them, such as 4q246, otherwise known as the Son of God text. However even though such texts are found within the dead sea scrolls, it doesn't equate to Scriptures.
brother the book of Enoch is for us in the end days possibly sealed and give to daniel
Agreed
Agreed
Then why was it around for so long???
Agreed. It's been reserved for the last days
@@Israel-of-Yah Dead sea scolls had fragments, that doesn't sound very well preserved.
Fascinating, but overwhelmingly debatable, from beginning to end.
Truly excellent research and teaching. I was blessed by your work in this area
This is neither research or teaching, it's assumption and slander.
What are you smoking
They researched nothing for this. Such a shame.
research and teaching? They literally gave their bias opinion with ZERO PROOF using scripture, which is required as a witness. They used NO WITNESSES to make their false accusations. since when is an opinion piece considered "research"? The fact is, not one single thing in the book of Enoch goes against the laws and commands of YHWY, or the teachings of Jesus, yet the book of Enoch does "in lock step" support these same things of YHWY and Jesus. hmmmmmm
I humbly disagree with you on this one. But, that's okay. We're not all going to agree on everything all the time. We all see through the glass darkly. 🙂
In Matthew 22 and Luke 20 Yahshua is asked which man's wife this woman will be in the resurrection. yahusha tells them that they do are and they do not know scripture for we do not marry in the resurrection will be like the angels. Well how would they know this because this is not found in the 66 book Canon? This information is only found in Enoch. Yahusha calls Enoch scripture in this statement by saying they do not know scripture. Many people who believe in the ball earth don't believe Enoch is scripture. Even though there are many descriptive texts of the Earth in the Bible, and none of them describe it as a ball. Also this ball Earth idea only came in the last 200-300 yrs. All the early Hebrews not to mention the other cultures believed in a flat Earth. Moses actually spoke to the Most High, u think he wouldn't know?
@@wendy2593 Yeshua used the Torah as the sword in the temptation against the devil. All prophecies were supposed to be judged by the Torah. He heavily relied on the Torah. He is the living Torah, the word of God.
We don't know whether Yeshua and the apostles quoted Enoch as a prophet of God or whether they were referencing a popular teaching from one who was deemed a prophet.
Yeshua quoted teachings by the Pharisees and Saduccees as well as the Oral Torah (later written down as the Mishnah and Talmud) as references. In that particular passage, He is answering the Saduccees with the teachings of the Pharisees. Granted not all doctrines of the Pharisees were wrong; He agreed with them on some principles and observances. In these verses, I don't know whether He is agreeing with the Pharisees or not.
However, Yeshua rebuked them for exalting the Oral Torah and traditions of men above the written Torah. I've read some of the Mishnah and Talmud. There are many legends and rabbinic teachings used to comment on the Hebraic scriptures. Some make sense and shed light on the Torah or give historical backgrounds on the people and cultures. But there are a lot of rabbinic commentaries that require a stretch of the imagination.
For example, the earth was created on the 1st of Tishri (named after the book of Genesis). Some sages taught that this is what happened on the day of the creation of man: Adam and Eve were created, they fell, Eve bore both Abel and Cain -- all on the same day! Then there's Abraham. Abraham married Keturah after Sarah's death; Keturah was actually Hagar whose name was changed and she bore many more children to Abraham.
Although I don't know the timeline of those above teachings, I believe many of the religious leaders were influenced by pagan beliefs and practices. Such beliefs and practices were thought to have come from Cain and his descendants. The famous ones came from Nimrod whose worship moved into all other nations. During the exile, the Jews learned the ways of the pagans and idolatry. So, stories and teachings were sometimes influenced by those cultures' religious beliefs.
These teachings weren't absent during the time of Yeshua. It's understandable to think that Yeshua would've quoted what the Pharisees believed and taught, whether it came from the Oral Torah (which they said superseded the written Torah) or from any prophet they studied. Maybe the Pharisees taught about Enoch (since this quote supposedly only comes from Enoch) and Yeshua is quoting what the Pharisees were teaching at the time. Yeshua and the apostles would've known the the doctrines of the Pharisees, Saduccees, and Essenes.
I'm not taking sides one way or the other. There's not enough evidence to convince me that Enoch is a true prophet considering the quotes about his being the "Son of Man." The fact that Charles needed to edit the book in order to make it more acceptable is rather concerning. (See video on Enoch: the Son of Man). I just feel like I need to study the Bible as I glean more each time I read it. The prophets there have enough for me to read and study. Interpretations vary on their writings, too. What are the correct interpretations? If I don't understand what they have to say, then I already have more digging to do regarding their prophecies.
@@csmitchell2227 where is scripture that says Yahshua quotes the oral talmud or oral Torah, where he calls it scripture?
You might not believe that Enoch is scripture but I do. If you don't want to believe it you don't have to believe. I also believe that the book of Jubilee scripture. Are you Jewish, or follow their tradition? They also don't want to believe these. Proverbs 25:2 tells us that is is the glory of God to conceal a matter and it is the honor of Kings to search it out
@@csmitchell2227 you might enjoy watching the Honor of Kings series done by a guy named Sean Griffin and Ken Heidebrecht on a channel called Kingdom in context or on hanging on his words. in several seasons they cover several different books and you might enjoy it and you might glean something from it
@@wendy2593 Wherever you read where He says, "You have heard it said ...," He is most likely quoting the Oral Torah. The Pharisees exalted the Oral Torah above the Torah given to Moses. Yeshua contrasts what "You have heard it said ..." with "but I say unto you ..."
Considering that Yeshua is the Living Torah and the Pharisees (the ones who were hypocritical) taught the Oral Torah, Yeshua is contrasting what they say to what He says. Almost every contentious moment He had with the Pharisees (the ones who were hypocritical), He was refuting their doctrine, the Oral Torah.
Yeshua went on to point out the ceremonial handwashing, washing the pots, doing good works on the Shabbat, healing the sick on the Shabbat, plucking ears of corn in the field on Shabbat, the tithing mint & cumin above honoring one's father and mother, etc. When Yeshua healed a man on the Shabbat and told him to stand up and take his mat, Yeshua was challenging the Oral Torah that the Pharisees were teaching. When Yeshua used the ground and spittle to cover the blind man's eyes and healing him, He challenged the Pharisees again because it was "unlawful" to mix or mold things on the Shabbat.
I'm a believer in Yeshua. I was not raised Jewish nor do I follow rabbinic teaching. I did indepth studies in the Torah for several years. Some of those studies did include what the rabbis taught and believed. From that, I was able to see what kinds of doctrines Yeshua refuted.
I returned to the Hebraic roots of our faith in Yeshua in the mid-1990s. I believe that in Yeshua we become grafted into Israel and are joined together as One New Man. 119 ministries did do a video on that topic, explaining the basic teachings around One New Man.
Took me a few days to watch. I wanted to write a few things. You're clearly missing something if you're saying it was revealed to a select few... It's a book for all eyes to see, in the end times. This isn't gold plates with special glasses requirements, this is a printed distributed book. All Jews knew about it back then before the diaspora, not just a select few. How was it exclusive? You mean the elect? You gloss over many facts here as well. It's hard to write a paragraph about a 45 minute video but you saying in Jude they quote Enoch, then read the contexts which says "Enoch prophesied" then say it's not inspired. I mean think about that statement you make here. You're saying it's prophesy but not to be regarded as scripture? Do you ignore some prophets? Do you teach people to ignore the prophets? If what you say is true then Jude can not be trusted because of the false testimony here claiming Enoch is a prophet. Even if it was passed down orally then why do you think writing it would be any less true? The Brit Hadashah states clearly Enoch prophesied which means we must listen or disregard the book of Jude as well. Ignore Enoch to your own peril, it was written for our time. It emerged as Israel became a nation in day and the dead sea scrolls were found at the same time. give or take a couple months, it is significant evidence. Also if what you say is true and it's an oral tradition then you just opened up a can of talmudic worms because if that oral tradition made it into the Brit Hadashah then ALL of it must be considered. The way you steer the conversation is odd too with out reference. And don't get me started on your lame translation, did you purposely chose one that said "myriads" instead of 10 thousand to steer even more? Mine says 10 thousand not myriads. Even the first Enoch link in google shows 10 thousand, not myriad. The one quote from Michael Hesier is just an opinion also, no fact here. He is assuming something. This how you get led away. Jude plainly says it is prophesy, not a false doctrine. Is Michael Hesier your new Paul or is Jude enough? If you're going to question whether all of Enoch is trustworthy then you must do the same with the Brit Hadashah big time. The catholic fingerprints are disgusting in it. Entire lines are missing from the gospels, the lines with deep meaning. We walk around half blind trying to make sense of it all.
It seems like your biggest problem with the Book of Enoch is that there are people who are chosen, the elect. Well I hate to break it to you but the Elect are real. Yeshua called me his Elect one day himself with his own mouth. Why would he break his silence on a day when I was not praying or doing anything religious just to say that if it wasn't important? Just working in my house, why would he break his silence to call me his elect? He told me he loves me, and I am his, he also told me to get ready. Not all are elect though so I will say that now so you don't call anyone who accepts Yeshua elect. Is that what you mean when you say it was for a select few? That book spells everyone out, the elect which always have Shalom with Abba, the righteous, who work for that same Shalom and the wicked who deny him and his ways. I don't mean literal work for the righteous, maybe accepting Yeshua and keeping the commandments is the "work" here. The righteous are those who do the will of God. The elect are not just anyone who believes but are selected for some reason. That has not been revealed. I do have prophetic dreams though. In one dream I watched a circle appear in the sky and angels poured out of it. People were screaming so loud. One angel flew to me and grabbed me and I woke up.
Keep the commandments, keep the testimony of Yeshua, seek our fathers face. There is no greater reward!
PS Son of Man is Ben Adam. Son of Adam. We are all Son of Man.
Exactly right brother here in this video they are very biased against the book of Enoch they have a lot to lose in their reputation if they appear to endorse it same with Michael Heizer a lot of times he washes his hands, I like your point about Jude and like timothy Alberino says if Jude said that Enoch prophesied and the Bible says that Christ is the spirit of prophecy therefore the spirit of Christ must be in the book of Enoch . When they say in this video that the angels said you are the son of man they are totally unfairly forcing the interpretation that Enoch is the Messiah instead of Jesus hilarious and unfair the book of Enoch is completely messianic about a Messiah in the future he gives glory to Jesus Christ there is no contradiction to any biblical doctrine they even erased one of my comments acting like Facebook fact checkers and I was not inappropriate in anyway I simply challenged them . A lot of us know that if we truly pay attention and we make our spiritual ears sensitive to what’s going on behind curtains in this world we realized that the book of Enoch makes a lot of sense with all this pseudoscience lies that Satan is engineering for the system of the antichrist.
Cherub, if you dont mind me asking, and this is in the context of knowing why you are elect, are or were you ever married?
AMEN
At 9:39 he seems concerned that we may not have an accurate representation of The Book of Enock as it was in the First Century. On that basis, we would have to conclude the same about the Canon... a foolish statement, as we must trust that God has protected ALL that he has passed on to mankind. Since we know that God DID reveal things to Enoch, we can be SURE that He had protected THAT word as well. Because Enoch struggled to describe things seen in his "vision(s)", is that any different than John's visions in the book of Revelation? John only shared what he saw. We trust the Holy Spirit to reveal what God was REALLY saying. Just saying...
some chapters are missing in the book of Enoch, go scroll through it.
So I’m guessing y’all didn’t watch the whole video. Because it’s very simple. Either you believe the Bible or you don’t. If you don’t , then you will continually be deceived. Everything this man said in the documentary he backed up with scripture
This fascination with The Book of Enoch is just dressed up Gnosticism.
Book of Enoch (1) is a massive support to the case of Jesus, probably the best when you start to analytically understand the Tanakh and NT, history etc. Yes it was written late and not by The Enoch. Idk, it rings some truth to me at least.
The Book of Enoch is a book of lies made up over 2400 years after the events it pretends to tell about. It reeks of lies. It does NOT lead to Jesus at all. Why do you think it does???
incorrect.
The Quran rings true to me. So by that definition it is true right?
@@justinerasmus8725 what most people don't understand:
God gave the Torah to Israel. Israel and the children of Ishmael are RELATED through Abraham. I'm a very exact person when it comes to using correct terms. For anyone who is descended form Abraham to call another descended, an antisemite, they are also speaking against themselves.
God states quite clearly that the nations can worship their other gods, but Israel, ONCE THEY ENTER INTO COVENANT with Him, are not allowed to.
So my takaway from this is:
If you feel called to practice Islam, then do so, but it serves a person well to explore everything related to God including the Bible that Christians and Jews have.
I have studied this myself over the years & agree with this presentation. Well done.
What Jesus says in Matthew 22:30 can only be found in 1 Enoch. Please refer to verse 29. And Jude alludes to 1 Enoch many times before directly quoting it, but you'd have to study "all scripture" (including 1 Enoch) to know that.
Quoting another book doesn’t make it scriptures. Unless you believe all the other secular books the Bible quoted are scripture?
@@godloves9163 But my friend....JESUS SAID IT!!! Of course I know, that means nothing if you don't belong to Him.
@@ateachableheart2649 Jesus also quoted other unbiblical sources. Does that mean those need to be included in the Bible? Secondly, the book of Enoch was a fake and how do you know it wasn’t written after claiming to be written before and then quoting Jesus…
@@godloves9163 Jesus IS LORD. For anyone who says otherwise by saying He quoted unbiblical sources is tantamount to blaspheming the Holy Spirit. Jesus had something to say about that. RU sure you wanna go there?
I think you're a shill, certainly NOT a true follower of Christ Jesus.
@@godloves9163 please cite the source of information that proves Enoch is a fake book. NO ONE can prove that and even if they could, then that makes Jesus a fake and there my friend you tread on dangerous ground.
The book of Enoch is one of the most referred to books in the Bible. If it's valid enough to be quoted in canon it's good enough to be in the Bible, any other answer doesn't make sense. I understand that it's easier to defend what is rather than admitting that mistakes have been made.
Might I add that the gospels themselves are believed to have been written between 66-110 ad so that your dismissal of Enoch based on when it was believed to be written would also dismiss the gospel 😬
If Enoch 1 is used to help a Holy Spirit filled believer bear fruit according to DIRECT Scripture, it is exceedingly valuable to those ministering to people caught up in deeper doubt, occult practice or intellectualizing. Not everyone receives the Holy Spirit the first day they begin to turn away from Babylon. We are all to grow in faith not doubt.The Father knows all. This book would not be here and now in this position as is if it was not used to teach true discernment. It is a teaching adjunct. We all know how short the time is. Ezekiel was also called "the Son of Man". Do not turn away as to be so confused that you give up distrusting everything.
Our lord Jesus says take everything to him in prayer and holy discernment I don't think there's anything wrong with any of this material we should take it all in just like the Sumerian Tablets or anything else it's not about the religion it's about our lord Jesus
Ezekiel was called “A” son of man, he was NOT called “THE” Son of Man. There’s a difference.
@@AnimalLover-yi5ik NO. He was addressed as "son of man" not "A son of man". BIG difference.
Hmmm. Wonder why Jude and the Holy Spirit come to polar opposite conclusions than you? Am I to believe you before the Holy Spirit.
@@ravenstone366 Interesting indeed.
@@ravenstone366 Tertullian the Latin historian makes it clear why Sadducees didn't allow Enoch and the New Testament into the Jewish canon. Because both Enoch and the New Testament were too Christ Centric. Too many people were getting saved after reading them.
@@ravenstone366 As for the Christian Canon we can all thank The Council of Laodecia and St Augustine. Laodecia rejected Revelation and Enoch from the Canon. St Augustine with Hippo and Carthrage reinstated Revelation back into the Canon. But Enoch wasn't reinserted because Augustine doubted the Genesis 6 accounts. Despite being historically affirmed Augustine's faith wasn't strong enough.
@@ravenstone366 hope that helps.
Love you in Christ.
Newfound Aventures
Hmmmm. Why would you throw away thousands of years of history written by many different authors, speaking many different languages, coming from all walks of life but all telling the same story for a book that contradicts all of that history? Perhaps you don't really know the history of our Bible, how it came about, why it came about and when or how it was transcribed, how it was treated, the different of materials used for ancient manuscripts and scrolls, how meticulous the scribes were during transcription and how they prided themselves on accuracy, who decided what books were in the Bible and which books weren't and why.
Here..pause the video and read this:
There is no secret to be close and to be with YAHUWAH. You only need to be good, kind, honest and most of all humble.
Good kind honest and mostly humble will go to hell if they dont know Jesus
The book of Enoch proves that the earth is flat and that Yahuah's Calendar from exodus 12:1 is what we should. Oh, and by the the FULL MOON is the new moon to start the count to the sabbath's and festivals. This is why those that adhere to Judaism reject the book of Enoch. May Yahuah bless you!
I believe there is much truth in the book of Enoch. But the Earth is not flat my friend, I promise this to you 🙌
@@named161 the earth is flat. Why would they fake the moonlanding? If the sun and moon are lights in the firmament, it doesnt make any sense for them to be planets. Space isnt like you think space is the place of celestial waters.
@@Mano.Mujica
Simply the earth isn't flat.
You're trying to use the Bible to push your ignorant idea...
I wonder if you've also not read in Isaiah where the scriptures says that the Lord sits in the circle of the Earth???
Simply .... The Bible isn't teaching geography.
It's passing a message of God's love , power and salvation to us in a way we will understand.
Simple.
All I know, and I am just a sinful man, not a Scholar, not a Theologian, just a man called by God to study and search for "The Truth," that is, "The Word of God." Therefore, I search and I study.......... to me, I have been called to study the "prophecies" of Enoch and gain a better understanding of The Revelations of Jesus Christ as told to the Apostle John. Read, study, and most of all, "discern!" Discern and Believe........ Jesus, I Trust in You! Hallelujah!!! Thanks and Blessings!!!
No matter what one's opinion is of the Book of Enoch, to lower the standard Enochic writings to the level of the book of Mormon is a gross Injustice.
I don't want to spam the comment section, but I do have another question. When Jesus reprimanded the Pharisees in Matthew chapter 22 verse 29 and 30 saying
_29 Jesus answered and said unto them, _*_Ye do err, not knowing the scriptures,_*_ nor the power of God._
_30 For in the resurrection they neither marry, nor are given in marriage, but are as the angels of God in heaven._
What scriptures is Yeshua referring to? There is no where eles in the Bible explaining this, however the Book of Enoch *does* give us an explanation.
I am not dogmatically saying that the Book of Enoch is Canon because of this one oversight however this definitely leads me to believe that the words of God have been perhapes tampered with...
Gravity Falls Canada Yep. That’s Enoch 15. The Sadducee, not Pharisee attempted to debunk the resurrection by using Tobit. Yahusha rebutted by using Enoch.
@@pm5206
Ah, thank you for the correction. Do you have the chapter in the book of Tobit that talks about this?
Gravity Falls Canada Tobit 3:8.
2 ''And go, say to the watchers of the
shamayim who have sent you to
intercede for them, 'You should
intercede for men, and not men for
you.
3 'Why have you left the high, qodesh,
and eternal shamayim, and lain with
women, and defiled yourselves with
the daughters of men and taken to
yourselves wives, and done like the
children of earth, and begotten giants
as sons?
4 'And though you were qodesh,
spiritual, living the eternal hai, you
have defiled yourselves with the blood
of women, and have brought forth with
the blood of flesh, and, as the children
of men, have lusted after flesh and
blood, as those also do who die and
perish.
The first book of Enoch is scriptural to me,
Maybe Enoch didn’t copy the later prophets, but God has continued to have the same revelation throughout history?
51:28 Ezekiel is also called Son of Man in the Septuagint
92 times!!
And that my brothers we call blasphemous. Whenever any1 is equated to Jesus he must be stoned
Just because a book isn't canon doesn't make it not written by the acclaimed writer. It just means that it's not true or honorable enough to be taken as gospel.
All things were created for him and by him and without him there is nothing made that has been made it's your Scholars the pick that one apart
@Paul kept the Sabbath Acts 18:4 what is refuted mean
Who are these church fathers to decide for us what is or not the inspired word of God? Only the Ruach Hakodesh (Holy Spirit) can guide us in to all truth Jn 16:13. HE will tell us what is inspired word of Yahuah, not those people who decided for us what we can or cannot read. I follow the Holy Spirit not Jews or scholars, or historians, much less 119 ministries. I will decide what is the word of Yahuah along with His guidance not theirs. Blessings and peace to all.
The earth is stationary. There is no solar system. We are geocentric.
The 1st and 2nd Book of Enoch is legit, but the 3rd is Jewish Kabbalistic Writing's.
The 1st Book is quoted in the Book of Jude word for word and the 2nd Book describes God Himself perfectly.
Praise the Lord the thing that makes me very sad is that people change staff and later claim God changed staff ,also the people who claim books are misleading but have never actually read these books ,some of you believe Elijah didn't die and was taken up in glory but Enoch wasn't so that God who enable that to happen to one prophet can't do it for another. Many believe God's word can't be temped with but yes it can but it will be preserved and if you seek for truth you will find it .I have read most lost book of the Bible it has given me a certain understand of things and events that happen and now I know why these books were taken out from the Bible because people should be kept in the dark of how powerful they are ,God created us more powerful then anything he created including Angels .But am here to encourage people to read books and ask the Holy spirit to give you the spirit of disearnment and trust me if those books aren't important you will know and your eyes will be open to truth .Am not saying am right but we should examine staff ourselves not relay on other people's oppinion .Remember the Sabbath was temped with so for those who think the word of God can't be touched think again but he still preserves the truth and those who seek the truth will find it.shalom
Eleven Aramaic-language fragments of the Book of Enochwere found in cave 4 of Qumran in 1948 and are in the care of the Israel Antiquities Authority. They were translated for and discussed by Józef Milik and Matthew Black in The Books ofEnoch. Another translation has been released by Vermes and Garcia-Martinez.
I believe they are small fragments, not entire paragraphs or chapters
All that tells you is that that part of the book is older than Qumram, NOT that it is true at all.
I stopped listening at 11 mins plus. My spirit is seriously fighting with these human comments discrediting the book of enoch.This book was directly referred to in the bible. So the bible made a mistake by referring to it. Please be careful.
You can not prove THIS is the book referenced in scripture. Be careful what you fall for!
I understand your difficulty but you should have listened on. He directly response to that
I disagree, Moses had to have something to follow to become the man he was and before him was the book of Enoch
Angie Jefferys the book of Enoch was the first book of the Bible , for it to go into such detail about the creation and what went wrong and who brought sin and how it came to be wrongfully intertwine with mankind ! And for so many to quote scriptures from it .
Besides , why would the CREATOR , take him away if he was a lie or fairytale! I can’t see it with my eyes nor with my heart , the Book is for these times of deception!!!!
It really should be the first book of the Bible.
Angie Jefferys
Moses had God to guide him.
@@mysphthejazzien10
Enoch wasn't a lie or a fairytale. The Book of Enoch found in the Ethioptic bible is suspect because it differs from the fragments written in Aramaic that were found at Qumran. Also, the Book of Parables (1 Enoch) was not found at Qumran. The Ethioptic version is thought to have come about around the 15th century AD because of errors and writing styles.
On calender :
The heavenly luminaries were given to correct those who followed exclusively a lunar calendar (which leads to at least 10 days of error per year), or those who followed exclusively a solar calendar (which would supplant the natural rhythm of life) - to set forth a firm calendar based on a solar-lunar system. Unfortunately, the purity of the earth’s orbit was not retained after the times of Yahusha ben Nun (Joshua), and the earth went from a 364 day year to a 365.2 day year
Dr. S. Pigeon blog
The mention that Enoch did die later Hebrews 11:13 is taken way out of context. Read Hebrews 11:5-13 again for clarification. It’s talking about the people after Enoch that died, not Enoch himself.
When I was obtaining a Theology degree in the 80's, I took a class on the Psalms taught by a Jewish minister and this person had studied at a NY College for Rabbi training. Ask any competent Rabbi and he will inform you that there are 5 SEPARATE BOOKS OF THE PSALMS! WHEN YOU ADD THESE 5 TO THE REMAINING 65 BOOKS, YOU COME UP WITH 70 BOOKS OF THE BIBLE! 10 (JUDGMENT) X 7 (PERFECTION) = 70 BOOKS =THE INSPIRED WORD OF YHWH !
Nope! If you ask any competany rabbi he wil tell you that the are far less than 70 books. Ezra Nehamiah is considered one book. So is both first and second Kings. All the minor prophets are considered one book. So your "insight" is dung.
Just one addition, the bible didn't say that Enoch did die in Hebrews 11:13,It was referring to all who did die, but it clearly states that "he did not see death," the bible did point out all who died in the rest of Hebrews 11 and they named most of the previous individuals except Sara and Enoch. But we read about Sara's death in Genesis so. Just pointing that out. So I believe it's contrary to say he did not die but died afterwards.
what disturbs me is that, this book existed in the bible earlier on ..so by then the book was inspired by God..but 200 years later, why say it's not inspired by God ..
cohen cyrus Exactly. It’s man made religious bs as I call it. Evidence, which is required and two witnesses agree that Enoch, Jubilees for example are in two ancient Scripture versions. Dead Sea Scrolls and Ethiopian version. We have historians who said that those two books were Scripture. Pharisees and Rome eventually rejected them because it is pro Torah and Messianic. It goes against their religion. If people want to reject Enoch, Jubilees, then to be consistent, they should reject NT. I don’t recommend that. People should be consistent and stop cherry picking and trust in false scholars that reject Scripture entirely and then accept some of Scripture and contradicting themselves. Here is something fro you to think about. Yahudah (Jude) 1:6 quotes a passage from the Testament (assumption) of Mosheh (Moses). Should we reject Jude? I think not. I don’t get why supposed defenders of Scripture want to reject parts of Scripture but not reject letters. Letters are NOT technically the Scriptures. Yes, they quote and allude to the Scriptures. See how messed up religion is and the true adherents to Scripture are attacked the most.
@@pm5206 thanks bro
They removed because they wanted to introduce NASA
You say Enoch couldn't have written the book because he quotes so much of the latter prophets after him , then you do not understand that God says He changes not , He is the same yesterday , today ,and forever ,He declares the End from the Beginning, That he is the first ,and The last , the beginning and the end .. That He ( God) is the Spirit of prophecy and Inspired men of God wrote the books
Judgement has already commenced at the cross. Enoch prophesies that the rebellious Angel's would be bound for 70 generations before they are judged. Some have observed that according to Luke's genealogy, there are 70 generations between Enoch and Yeshua. And if Enoch was the seventh generation from Adam, then Yeshua would be the 77th. If one understands the significance of the number 7 in the entire Bible, one should not dismiss such symbolic importance.
DO OVER
This isn’t the 119 Ministries that I have came to know.
I find a lot of similarities between Job and Enoch, I’ve been curious if they had the same original author for a long time. Personally I’m a believer that Enoch was originally an inspired book and was rejected for its messianic content and ended up being badly copied and added to. Enoch has parts that IMHO have no basis outside of being Holy Spirit breathed
I think some people think Enoch 1 is decent, but 2 and 3 were added far later and may be full of speculation. I'm not sure though, haven't read it myself.
@@MrSirFluffy that is correct. Ethiopian ENoch is the accurate one. Enoch 2 and 3 are adulterated and corrupt.
I believe the Quran was Godly breathed. So because of my belief it is true right? By your definition
IMHO. Coz im honest and cannot lie
As much as I like the book of Enoch, I have to agree with this video. Ty 119
Enoch was God’s first scribe. He is also 1 of 2 men to go be with God without knowing death. What more authoritative do you need than that?
That is Enoch, the question is did he write the book of Enoch?
Chanok 104
I swear unto you, that in the shamayim the messengers remember you for good before the esteem of the Great One, and your names are written before the esteem of the Great One.
2 Be hopeful; for beforehand you were put to shame through ill and affliction; but now you shall shine as the lights of the shamayim, you shall shine and you shall be seen, and the doors of the shamayim shall be opened to you.
3 And in your cry, cry for judgment, and it shall appear to you; for all your tribulation shall be visited on the rulers, and on all who helped those who plundered you.
4 Be hopeful, and do not cast away your hopes, for you shall have great joy as the messengers of the shamayim.
5 What shall you be obliged to do? You shall not have to hide on the day of the great judgment and you shall not be found as sinners, and the eternal judgment shall be far from you for all the generations of the world.
6 And now, do not fear you righteous, when you see the sinners growing strong and prospering in their ways. Do not be companions with them, but keep far from their violence; for you shall become companions of the hosts of the shamayim.
7 And, although you sinners say, ''All our sins shall not be searched out and be written down,'' nevertheless they shall write down all your sins every day.
8 And now I show unto you that light and darkness, day and night, see all your sins.
9 Do not be wicked in your hearts, and do not lie and do not alter the Words of uprightness, nor charge with lying the Words of the Qodash Great One, nor take account of your idols; for all your lying and all your wickedness do not come forth in righteousness but in great sin.
10 And now I know this mystery, that sinners will change and pervert the Words of righteousness in many ways, and will speak wicked words, and lie, and practice great deceits, and write books concerning their words.
11 But when they write down truthfully all My Words in their languages, and do not change or diminish ought from My Words but write them all down truthfully - all that I first testified concerning them.
12 Then, I know another mystery, that books will be given to the righteous and the wise to become a cause of joy and uprightness and much wisdom.
13 ''And to them shall the books be given, and they shall believe in them and rejoice over them, and then all the righteous who have learned from them - all the paths of uprightness - shall be recompensed.''
Chanok 105
105:1 In those days, he says, “𐤉𐤄𐤅𐤄 will be patient and cause the children of the earth to hear. Reveal it to them with YOUR Wisdom, for YOU are their guides; and YOU are a reward upon the whole earth.”
2 “Until I and My Son are united with them forever in the upright paths in their lifetime and there shall be shalom unto you, rejoice, you children of Truth. Aman.”
Amen, how about this:
The Ascension of Yeshayahu 3:
31 And they will make of *none effect the prophecy of the prophets which were before me,* and these my visions also will they make of none effect, in order to speak after the impulse of their own hearts.