Henry is an amazing character in this movie. The film shows how you can’t really trust anyone in this world, something we all learn when it’s too late, just like the king did.
I dont think he learned it too late - he wasnt trusting anyone before he became King. But he learned to trust after he became King and luckily had great people around he can trust and thats how he won the war with France.
Panth Barola theres also the fact that henry V was not a good or merciful or just king as portrayed in this film at all lmao shakespeares plays were basically propaganda and historians describe Henry V as an especially devious and cruel ruler, even for his time
@@panthbarola1256 that is NOT WHOLLY TRUE, this was Agincourt 1415--Henry died 7 years later in 1422....The fight with Hotspur was 1402 so they took some artistic license in parts
The speech he did to his knights before the battle was extremely powerful. It was one of my favourite parts. This movie was thrilling and kept me on the edge of my seat.
That speech, is in my opinion the best in movie history. This portrayal of Henry V is absolutely magnificent, and as others have said, the speech kind of makes you want to fight for England, even as a Norwegian😂
Our historic Kings were a mix of hooligans, murderers, and the occasional hero like Henry V (very rare) I think it's a good portrayal, if not entirely accurate... of Henry.@@4Hicks
This is a fantastic movie , the cast is amazing and the story (politics) is superb. I watched it twice to see what I missed the first time. So good, highly recommend it.
You realise, that this film is a british propaganda and is constantly lying on historical facts in order to do some french bashing. In fact it couldn't be further away from reality. The Henry V portrayed in this movie is a insult to any man or woman that knows a bit about history. Let me educate you: 1) Henry V was a super violent savage to his people. He did not care a bit for the men that fought for him and treated them as badly as was possible in medieval Europe 2) He constantly violated the codes of chivalry 3) He was everything but an handsome young man. In fact he was a very ugly man and was stung in a war (before France) by an arrow (in 1403, battle of Shrewsbury, before his coronation) that severally disfigured him on his right cheek. That's also the reason why there is only 1 representation of him and that it only shows his left profile. 4) Historians (including british historians), describe Henry V as one of the most agressive and devious products of a time of violence and duplicity 5) He was never provoked by France, as shown in the movie. He started assembling his army a long time before invading France 6) France never tried to assassinat him. 7) he was the one, that declared war on France --------- 8) The french king was a very pious and discret 18 year old man 9) He kept himself far from battlefields because of his poor health. He was not even there in Azincourt. 10) He died a few weeks after Azincourt because of his very poor health. 11) After the battle of Azincourt he threatened his soldiers to cut of their ears if any sound was to be heard in the night. 12) He asked every prisoner to be killed after the battle. His men didn't want to follow his cruel orders, but finally 20 men accomplished his wishes. 2000 prisoner where killed by axes and masses in the head or burned alive. -------- 10) In the movie the English troops are shown to be all foot soldiers, which is completely wrong because in reality they where nearly all mounted on horses. In fact is the Azincourt campaign was a chase between France and England. The british started at Harfleur (Normandy), the french started at Rouen (Normandy) and it ended as we all know in Azincourt (Pas-de-Calais) 11) In reality the siege of Harfleur was a lot more hard for the English as portrayed in the movie. 400 french soldiers fought no less than 11.300 English soldiers for more than 1 month. The English tried to attack the castle by attacking trough tunnels and the french attacked them by doing counter tunnels which led to fierce underground battles. Besides that, the french went out many times (of the castle) to attack the English. The English lost more than 2.000 men and the french around 140 men. 2.000 additional English soldiers had to go back to England after the siege because of injuries and illnesses. --------- 12) At Azincourt, the french have never been on the top of the hill, because the English where on the hill, which is a tactical better place (especially for bows). So the english had the advantage from the start 13) The english archers where not visible as the hided in the woods on the side of the battlefield 14) Because of the mud and the arrows that came from each side, chaos started amongst the french knights. their horses panicked and fled in the direction of the french army (that caused a lot of causalities) 15) Very few french knight where able to attain the english army. Those who did, cazsed a lot of damage to the english and the personal guard of the King was nearly entirely killed
@@Julien-yc3zy nice spelling and yes mate henry v was at AGINCOURT, he saved the life of his brother who was still alive and he loved dearly, this movie is not historically accurate but it takes alot of the plot from Shakespeare's play not real life, so no need to cry over the internet , I don't care if it is called azincourt in France everybody knows the battle as Agincourt so just use that
@@Julien-yc3zy you seem way to smart to believe this is supposed to portray actual real events lol we all know it isn’t accurate .. just enjoy it as a movie bro it’s not that serious
@@bobbyclair386 just coming to mind the movie “kingdom of heaven” is really good that one is about the crusades also the movie “medieval” also “braveheart” Not very historically accurate but still good also I was a Huge fan of the movie 13 assassins it’s japneese and about samurai but still so good
The dialogues, the acting, the tension, the atmosphere, the music, the monologues, the stakes, the emotions, everything is perfect. Even if the real story is different. King Henry 5 was not at all a conciliatory king, or kind, he was actually very cruel, and murdered many innocent people ; he plunged France into the most deadly holy war through the centuries. He died shortly (2 years) after marrying Catherine. The film is taken from Shakespear's play, fictionalized, to glorify England and ridicule France. When in France, at this time the monarchy was affected by hereditary madness, which greatly weakened the kingdom and allowed England to establish its power and control. beyond that, in terms of pseudo fiction, the film is incredible. Timothée is absolutely stunning in the skin of this young King, on whom weighed a lot of weight.
You realise, that this film is a british propaganda and is constantly lying on historical facts in order to do some french bashing. In fact it couldn't be further away from reality. The Henry V portrayed in this movie is a insult to any man or woman that knows a bit about history. Let me educate you: 1) Henry V was a super violent savage to his people. He did not care a bit for the men that fought for him and treated them as badly as was possible in medieval Europe 2) He constantly violated the codes of chivalry 3) He was everything but an handsome young man. In fact he was a very ugly man and was stung in a war (before France) by an arrow (in 1403, battle of Shrewsbury, before his coronation) that severally disfigured him on his right cheek. That's also the reason why there is only 1 representation of him and that it only shows his left profile. 4) Historians (including british historians), describe Henry V as one of the most agressive and devious products of a time of violence and duplicity 5) He was never provoked by France, as shown in the movie. He started assembling his army a long time before invading France 6) France never tried to assassinat him. 7) he was the one, that declared war on France --------- 8) The french king was a very pious and discret 18 year old man 9) He kept himself far from battlefields because of his poor health. He was not even there in Azincourt. 10) He died a few weeks after Azincourt because of his very poor health. 11) After the battle of Azincourt he threatened his soldiers to cut of their ears if any sound was to be heard in the night. 12) He asked every prisoner to be killed after the battle. His men didn't want to follow his cruel orders, but finally 20 men accomplished his wishes. 2000 prisoner where killed by axes and masses in the head or burned alive. -------- 10) In the movie the English troops are shown to be all foot soldiers, which is completely wrong because in reality they where nearly all mounted on horses. In fact is the Azincourt campaign was a chase between France and England. The british started at Harfleur (Normandy), the french started at Rouen (Normandy) and it ended as we all know in Azincourt (Pas-de-Calais) 11) In reality the siege of Harfleur was a lot more hard for the English as portrayed in the movie. 400 french soldiers fought no less than 11.300 English soldiers for more than 1 month. The English tried to attack the castle by attacking trough tunnels and the french attacked them by doing counter tunnels which led to fierce underground battles. Besides that, the french went out many times (of the castle) to attack the English. The English lost more than 2.000 men and the french around 140 men. 2.000 additional English soldiers had to go back to England after the siege because of injuries and illnesses. --------- 12) At Azincourt, the french have never been on the top of the hill, because the English where on the hill, which is a tactical better place (especially for bows). So the english had the advantage from the start 13) The english archers where not visible as the hided in the woods on the side of the battlefield 14) Because of the mud and the arrows that came from each side, chaos started amongst the french knights. their horses panicked and fled in the direction of the french army (that caused a lot of causalities) 15) Very few french knight where able to attain the english army. Those who did, cazsed a lot of damage to the english and the personal guard of the King was nearly entirely killed
@@Julien-yc3zy 1) Yes Henry was violent but this is the Middle Ages and to be a good king you had to assert authority, just look at his son Henry VI. He was the complete opposite to his father you could say he was kind however, this led to a bloody civil war, much worst than what his father did. 2) Yes Henry did break the rules of chivalry at Agincourt, what choice did he have though? He had more prisoners than he did soldiers. Let’s be honest did those French prisoners deserve mercy for what they intended to do to the English? 3) No Henry was not ugly and even if he was so what? Do you believe a king ruled effectively from their good looks? Henry did get an arrow to the face at Shrewsbury however, he made a full recovery with a battle scar that could only compliment him on his bravery in battle. 4) Louis was not an 18 year old king, he was the son of Charles VI or Charles the Mad because well he was mad. Louis was not promising and was a weak man who fuelled a feud between the Armagnacs and the Burgundians. He died of dysentery shortly after Agincourt. 5) If you are going to lecture anyone on accuracy please don’t call the English as being British, they weren’t. The Scottish were actually one of Frances biggest supporters and fought against the English in numerous battles during the Hundred Years’ War. 6) You clearly don’t know what Henry’s tactic was at Agincourt do you? Firstly, Agincourt was a flat field and is not known for its hills. Secondly, the English had no advantage other than the fact they were fighting in winter where the ground was wet and muddy. Henry ordered his men to dig stakes into the ground to protect the majority of the army who were archers, which was to provide protection for the archers against cavalry attacks, which worked. 7) Henry did care for his subjects very much. He is known to be the first King of England since the times of Harold Godwinson to write all his accounts and correspondence in English, he banned the use of French in parliament and wanted to strive for prosperity across England.
Timothee Chalamet is a beyond understanding brilliant actor. He's 1 of the great 1's. Brad Pitt, Al Pacino, Leonardo DiCaprio, Woody Allen & other big names, all want to work with him because he can act & of course, he's GORGEOUS.🏆
i seen this on Netflix i watched must be about a dozen times and never tire of watching it i just wish BBC or ITV would put it on so all those who don't have netflix can watch it a very inspiring movie one of my very top favorites
the king I must admit that I only saw him because Sean Harris was in the cast but it was a very pleasant surprise the film I really liked I felt various sensations especially for the extraordinary change of Hall then Sean Harris very good in the part of William a good puppeteer what to say I would have liked to see a series
The audio track is entirely too loud, but the choice of scenes and the thoughtful dialogue is fantastic. The team did an awesome job telling that store of King Henry V
I would probably go with Henry V I don't know how accurate this movie is on why he went to war with France But this dude destroyed the most populous country in Europe over a Tennis ball and a failed assassination attempt.
Henry V was, by far. If I had to battle either him or VIII, I would choose VIII any day. Henry V was a cunning and cool man who was not only brilliant in battle but in diplomacy too. I mean the man took an arrow to the face during a battle when he was 16 and still carried on fighting until it was won. Henry VIII was intimidating but not as effective as what V was.
@@henryvkingofenglandandfran7220 diplomacy??‽‽ this man beat the French so bad they where literally about to crown him King, him and Charles died within months of each other
@@mostlytrue3150 Henry was made regent and heir as a product of the Treaty of Troyes. His victory at Agincourt and his conquest of Normandy did help him. However, he would have just been made king because of it. Because of his skills in diplomacy he managed to be made regent and heir to the Kingdom of France. His victories were no more important than what Edward III’s were during the early parts of the war, in fact Edward did more as his reign was 50 years long. Edward never was made heir to the French crown, he only enlarged his holdings in France. Henry on the other hand, he managed to become heir due to clever diplomacy.
I don't understand why this moovie shows Henry V as a peaceful king. In the end he was doing an invasion. He also executed hundreds of prisoners during his (lost) campaign But very nice edit btw !
Both He & His Grandson Henry Viii hated there Father's and Had Become There Father's hatred & there Father's sin's Not by loving there other son's They Had Become There Great Fear The Hade Become There Father's
I can't stand this movie, it makes me so angry because it's as far from historical facts as it can be. If you look at this movie and you know the bare minimum about the 100 year war history, you can't over watch that anglo-saxon propaganda and the constant and unrealistic french-bashing.
Doesn't the film end with treachery in Henry's ranks, and wisdom and righteousness being demonstrated by the French? I'd say this film is more on the side of shining too good a light on Henry than it is guilty of any particular shade on the French.
I see these comments about French bashing all the time on videos about this film. But actually I see no French bashing here. In fact, other than the Dauphin, the French characters are reflected very well. I think you are being a bit overly sensitive....
Henry is an amazing character in this movie. The film shows how you can’t really trust anyone in this world, something we all learn when it’s too late, just like the king did.
I dont think he learned it too late - he wasnt trusting anyone before he became King. But he learned to trust after he became King and luckily had great people around he can trust and thats how he won the war with France.
@@petekdemircioglu unfortunately he died 2 years later and was not crowned King of France.
Panth Barola theres also the fact that henry V was not a good or merciful or just king as portrayed in this film at all lmao shakespeares plays were basically propaganda and historians describe Henry V as an especially devious and cruel ruler, even for his time
Edgy
@@panthbarola1256 that is NOT WHOLLY TRUE, this was Agincourt 1415--Henry died 7 years later in 1422....The fight with Hotspur was 1402 so they took some artistic license in parts
The speech he did to his knights before the battle was extremely powerful. It was one of my favourite parts. This movie was thrilling and kept me on the edge of my seat.
Fr. Bro was about to be having me fight for England.
That speech, is in my opinion the best in movie history. This portrayal of Henry V is absolutely magnificent, and as others have said, the speech kind of makes you want to fight for England, even as a Norwegian😂
I liked it but it reminded me of the average bri ish football fan
@@4Hickswhere do you think that come from haha?
Our historic Kings were a mix of hooligans, murderers, and the occasional hero like Henry V (very rare) I think it's a good portrayal, if not entirely accurate... of Henry.@@4Hicks
This is a fantastic movie , the cast is amazing and the story (politics) is superb. I watched it twice to see what I missed the first time. So good, highly recommend it.
You realise, that this film is a british propaganda and is constantly lying on historical facts in order to do some french bashing. In fact it couldn't be further away from reality. The Henry V portrayed in this movie is a insult to any man or woman that knows a bit about history.
Let me educate you:
1) Henry V was a super violent savage to his people. He did not care a bit for the men that fought for him and treated them as badly as was possible in medieval Europe
2) He constantly violated the codes of chivalry
3) He was everything but an handsome young man. In fact he was a very ugly man and was stung in a war (before France) by an arrow (in 1403, battle of Shrewsbury, before his coronation) that severally disfigured him on his right cheek. That's also the reason why there is only 1 representation of him and that it only shows his left profile.
4) Historians (including british historians), describe Henry V as one of the most agressive and devious products of a time of violence and duplicity
5) He was never provoked by France, as shown in the movie. He started assembling his army a long time before invading France
6) France never tried to assassinat him.
7) he was the one, that declared war on France
---------
8) The french king was a very pious and discret 18 year old man
9) He kept himself far from battlefields because of his poor health. He was not even there in Azincourt.
10) He died a few weeks after Azincourt because of his very poor health.
11) After the battle of Azincourt he threatened his soldiers to cut of their ears if any sound was to be heard in the night.
12) He asked every prisoner to be killed after the battle. His men didn't want to follow his cruel orders, but finally 20 men accomplished his wishes. 2000 prisoner where killed by axes and masses in the head or burned alive.
--------
10) In the movie the English troops are shown to be all foot soldiers, which is completely wrong because in reality they where nearly all mounted on horses. In fact is the Azincourt campaign was a chase between France and England. The british started at Harfleur (Normandy), the french started at Rouen (Normandy) and it ended as we all know in Azincourt (Pas-de-Calais)
11) In reality the siege of Harfleur was a lot more hard for the English as portrayed in the movie. 400 french soldiers fought no less than 11.300 English soldiers for more than 1 month. The English tried to attack the castle by attacking trough tunnels and the french attacked them by doing counter tunnels which led to fierce underground battles. Besides that, the french went out many times (of the castle) to attack the English. The English lost more than 2.000 men and the french around 140 men. 2.000 additional English soldiers had to go back to England after the siege because of injuries and illnesses.
---------
12) At Azincourt, the french have never been on the top of the hill, because the English where on the hill, which is a tactical better place (especially for bows). So the english had the advantage from the start
13) The english archers where not visible as the hided in the woods on the side of the battlefield
14) Because of the mud and the arrows that came from each side, chaos started amongst the french knights. their horses panicked and fled in the direction of the french army (that caused a lot of causalities)
15) Very few french knight where able to attain the english army. Those who did, cazsed a lot of damage to the english and the personal guard of the King was nearly entirely killed
@@Julien-yc3zy nice spelling and yes mate henry v was at AGINCOURT, he saved the life of his brother who was still alive and he loved dearly, this movie is not historically accurate but it takes alot of the plot from Shakespeare's play not real life, so no need to cry over the internet , I don't care if it is called azincourt in France everybody knows the battle as Agincourt so just use that
@@Julien-yc3zy you accuse the film of doing British propaganda and now you're doing French propaganda. The irony is so clear it's almost tangible lmao
@@jimzimmer2048 A few years later Joan of Arc drove the English oit of France (bouter les Anglais hors de toute France)
@@Julien-yc3zy you seem way to smart to believe this is supposed to portray actual real events lol we all know it isn’t accurate .. just enjoy it as a movie bro it’s not that serious
I watch this movie about twice a week. Im never into medieval movies but this is a fuckin masterpiece.
Check out the outlaw king
And I thought once a month was too much. 🙃 it's my 2nd favorite movie of all time.
Any more movies you have seen along in line with it?
@@vielplaysdagames2298 Would love more movie suggestions like that.
@@bobbyclair386 just coming to mind the movie “kingdom of heaven” is really good that one is about the crusades also the movie “medieval” also “braveheart” Not very historically accurate but still good also I was a Huge fan of the movie 13 assassins it’s japneese and about samurai but still so good
The dialogues, the acting, the tension, the atmosphere, the music, the monologues, the stakes, the emotions, everything is perfect. Even if the real story is different. King Henry 5 was not at all a conciliatory king, or kind, he was actually very cruel, and murdered many innocent people ; he plunged France into the most deadly holy war through the centuries. He died shortly (2 years) after marrying Catherine. The film is taken from Shakespear's play, fictionalized, to glorify England and ridicule France. When in France, at this time the monarchy was affected by hereditary madness, which greatly weakened the kingdom and allowed England to establish its power and control. beyond that, in terms of pseudo fiction, the film is incredible. Timothée is absolutely stunning in the skin of this young King, on whom weighed a lot of weight.
he is my favorite king
You realise, that this film is a british propaganda and is constantly lying on historical facts in order to do some french bashing. In fact it couldn't be further away from reality. The Henry V portrayed in this movie is a insult to any man or woman that knows a bit about history.
Let me educate you:
1) Henry V was a super violent savage to his people. He did not care a bit for the men that fought for him and treated them as badly as was possible in medieval Europe
2) He constantly violated the codes of chivalry
3) He was everything but an handsome young man. In fact he was a very ugly man and was stung in a war (before France) by an arrow (in 1403, battle of Shrewsbury, before his coronation) that severally disfigured him on his right cheek. That's also the reason why there is only 1 representation of him and that it only shows his left profile.
4) Historians (including british historians), describe Henry V as one of the most agressive and devious products of a time of violence and duplicity
5) He was never provoked by France, as shown in the movie. He started assembling his army a long time before invading France
6) France never tried to assassinat him.
7) he was the one, that declared war on France
---------
8) The french king was a very pious and discret 18 year old man
9) He kept himself far from battlefields because of his poor health. He was not even there in Azincourt.
10) He died a few weeks after Azincourt because of his very poor health.
11) After the battle of Azincourt he threatened his soldiers to cut of their ears if any sound was to be heard in the night.
12) He asked every prisoner to be killed after the battle. His men didn't want to follow his cruel orders, but finally 20 men accomplished his wishes. 2000 prisoner where killed by axes and masses in the head or burned alive.
--------
10) In the movie the English troops are shown to be all foot soldiers, which is completely wrong because in reality they where nearly all mounted on horses. In fact is the Azincourt campaign was a chase between France and England. The british started at Harfleur (Normandy), the french started at Rouen (Normandy) and it ended as we all know in Azincourt (Pas-de-Calais)
11) In reality the siege of Harfleur was a lot more hard for the English as portrayed in the movie. 400 french soldiers fought no less than 11.300 English soldiers for more than 1 month. The English tried to attack the castle by attacking trough tunnels and the french attacked them by doing counter tunnels which led to fierce underground battles. Besides that, the french went out many times (of the castle) to attack the English. The English lost more than 2.000 men and the french around 140 men. 2.000 additional English soldiers had to go back to England after the siege because of injuries and illnesses.
---------
12) At Azincourt, the french have never been on the top of the hill, because the English where on the hill, which is a tactical better place (especially for bows). So the english had the advantage from the start
13) The english archers where not visible as the hided in the woods on the side of the battlefield
14) Because of the mud and the arrows that came from each side, chaos started amongst the french knights. their horses panicked and fled in the direction of the french army (that caused a lot of causalities)
15) Very few french knight where able to attain the english army. Those who did, cazsed a lot of damage to the english and the personal guard of the King was nearly entirely killed
@@Julien-yc3zy chill
@@Julien-yc3zy he's a king
it's only a movie
@@Julien-yc3zy 1) Yes Henry was violent but this is the Middle Ages and to be a good king you had to assert authority, just look at his son Henry VI. He was the complete opposite to his father you could say he was kind however, this led to a bloody civil war, much worst than what his father did.
2) Yes Henry did break the rules of chivalry at Agincourt, what choice did he have though? He had more prisoners than he did soldiers. Let’s be honest did those French prisoners deserve mercy for what they intended to do to the English?
3) No Henry was not ugly and even if he was so what? Do you believe a king ruled effectively from their good looks? Henry did get an arrow to the face at Shrewsbury however, he made a full recovery with a battle scar that could only compliment him on his bravery in battle.
4) Louis was not an 18 year old king, he was the son of Charles VI or Charles the Mad because well he was mad. Louis was not promising and was a weak man who fuelled a feud between the Armagnacs and the Burgundians. He died of dysentery shortly after Agincourt.
5) If you are going to lecture anyone on accuracy please don’t call the English as being British, they weren’t. The Scottish were actually one of Frances biggest supporters and fought against the English in numerous battles during the Hundred Years’ War.
6) You clearly don’t know what Henry’s tactic was at Agincourt do you? Firstly, Agincourt was a flat field and is not known for its hills. Secondly, the English had no advantage other than the fact they were fighting in winter where the ground was wet and muddy. Henry ordered his men to dig stakes into the ground to protect the majority of the army who were archers, which was to provide protection for the archers against cavalry attacks, which worked.
7) Henry did care for his subjects very much. He is known to be the first King of England since the times of Harold Godwinson to write all his accounts and correspondence in English, he banned the use of French in parliament and wanted to strive for prosperity across England.
This is so powerful! brought back the power of watching the film
Timothee Chalamet is a beyond understanding brilliant actor. He's 1 of the great 1's. Brad Pitt, Al Pacino, Leonardo DiCaprio, Woody Allen & other big names, all want to work with him because he can act & of course, he's GORGEOUS.🏆
I LOVE Henry V 🤦🏾 I've watched it about 10 time & he didn't overdue William Shakespeare words💯
I watched it twice to see maybe there's something that I missed, especially the war strategy with French.
Love the new King, Henry V.
A brilliant film. A truly brilliant film.
Best medieval film I've ever had the pleasure to witness
Hell of an actor is timothee
A king is presented with quandaries lesser men may never encounter in the course of their whole lives
One of my favorite movies......😘💕💕💕💕👍
One of the only kings of England I stan
Him Henry II Richard I Edward I and Edward III
The soundtrack and movie is so wowwww! Blow my mind ! I love it ! Timothee is so talent 😍
This movie was so great besides Timothée being the main attraction for many of us lol
The speech he did to his knights before the battle, he repeated dozens of times during the day to have this rage.
This movie is exquisitely done. Absolutely perfect for folks who appreciate historical genre.
i seen this on Netflix i watched must be about a dozen times and never tire of watching it i just wish BBC or ITV would put it on so all those who don't have netflix can watch it a very inspiring movie one of my very top favorites
Even though the battle scenes are not truly accurate, this was a great film, Timothee is such a great actor
damn Timmy, you are gooooood
the king I must admit that I only saw him because Sean Harris was in the cast but it was a very pleasant surprise the film I really liked I felt various sensations especially for the extraordinary change of Hall then Sean Harris very good in the part of William a good puppeteer what to say I would have liked to see a series
The best King from the House of Lancaster. If only he didn't die...
THIS IS SUCH A GREAT EDIT!💗
A wonderful job!
The audio track is entirely too loud, but the choice of scenes and the thoughtful dialogue is fantastic. The team did an awesome job telling that store of King Henry V
If by audio track you mean the music, I agree. Hard to hear the dialogue
Una de mis pelicula favoritas de Netflix y más con ese papasote de Timothée 😍😍😁
Back when kings fought wars
awesome video. Timothee is the only one who can rock a bowl cut and look good haha
I love how timothee portrayed the drunkard prince to king switch in his character, it was thrilling to see his facial expressions when he is king
This is why England has always and will always be a nation of leaders and warriors
Ive given my life to them too💚💜👑
Goosebumps!!
Incredible
Others: Why he married Catherine??? D=
Me: Why he cutted his loong hair???D=
Life is hard when u have crush on actor D=
His short hair kinda reminds me of a Norman haircut. I think it suits him
I feel like this should’ve been the actual trailer lmao
I love this edit so much !!
The best King ever
He didn't want to be but he became a great one.
This is the best Edit!!!
Great video and great film
Amazing Video 💗 I Love it 💗
Jesus is king😢❤❤❤❤
Un Rey sin Corona... En El Film nunca vi La Corona...
Me too
Behold, the lion which is of the tribe of Judah, the root of David, has overcome so as to open the book, and its seven seals: Revelation 5:4
Who is more intimidating Henry V or Henry VIII ?
I would probably go with Henry V
I don't know how accurate this movie is on why he went to war with France
But this dude destroyed the most populous country in Europe over a Tennis ball and a failed assassination attempt.
@@mostlytrue3150 and apprently he was just tricked lol
Henry V was, by far. If I had to battle either him or VIII, I would choose VIII any day. Henry V was a cunning and cool man who was not only brilliant in battle but in diplomacy too. I mean the man took an arrow to the face during a battle when he was 16 and still carried on fighting until it was won. Henry VIII was intimidating but not as effective as what V was.
@@henryvkingofenglandandfran7220 diplomacy??‽‽ this man beat the French so bad they where literally about to crown him King, him and Charles died within months of each other
@@mostlytrue3150 Henry was made regent and heir as a product of the Treaty of Troyes. His victory at Agincourt and his conquest of Normandy did help him. However, he would have just been made king because of it. Because of his skills in diplomacy he managed to be made regent and heir to the Kingdom of France. His victories were no more important than what Edward III’s were during the early parts of the war, in fact Edward did more as his reign was 50 years long. Edward never was made heir to the French crown, he only enlarged his holdings in France. Henry on the other hand, he managed to become heir due to clever diplomacy.
Big King!
amazing edit and great scene selections, shame the audio track drowned out the words to hear them.
That’s the good one! Thank you ❤️👏🏻
I hate that because he died the Tutor line started. I love the plantagenet sotories more.
In This movie never see the crown....
A real king don’t need crown...
@@araene2366 yea you tell em!! 🗣🗣
I don't understand why this moovie shows Henry V as a peaceful king. In the end he was doing an invasion. He also executed hundreds of prisoners during his (lost) campaign
But very nice edit btw !
In the movie, he does order all those prisoners killed.
If I remember it right this movie is based on Shakespeares version of Henry V
“As a kind person?” My guy looks like he his on high half of the time. And he does kill lots of people in the film
this movie is fiction. A piece of art. Hitler didn't die in a French cinema - this doesn't make Tarantino's movie less great.
Excellent, thank you. Is the music from the Soundtrack?
ENGLAND IS YOUUUU!!!!
He’s my uncle , gimme the crown England
Great Montage - meaning here for where we are now.
I'm not thure why, but i felt ethpethully drawn to the archbithop character. Thpectacular man in thith film, overlooked in my opinion.
Отец я с тобой. С тобой до конца. Разве ты не видишь?
💚💜💚💜💚💜💚
SUPERB
Hey Henry
Timothe looks hotter with short hair
Not having the score from Nicolas Britell in this edit was a huge mistake.
ای جان
Timothee??❤️😭
Why wouldn't they just call it "Henry V" instead of "The King"
Both He & His Grandson Henry Viii hated there Father's and Had Become There Father's hatred & there Father's sin's Not by loving there other son's They Had Become There Great Fear The Hade Become There Father's
*THEIR. Not there.
Henry VIII wasn’t Henry V grandson. Get it right.
@@joshuawaring4180 But in Fact Henry VII and Richard The III were Both Descent To Edward The III That Makes Him Related to Henry IV
In Fact Henry VII & Richard The III Are Both Descent To King Edward The III
3:06 🔨
Title of the movie????
HENRY5せいは、ふらんすのおういけいしようにはんたいするぶるかごにゆはとあらそいふらんすのあるまにつくはおひきいてちかつていたときいたことがあります。 3:56 3:57
2:46 win?... ဝင္?
what app
🤣🤣🤣
Tbh rise of empires was better
I can't stand this movie, it makes me so angry because it's as far from historical facts as it can be.
If you look at this movie and you know the bare minimum about the 100 year war history, you can't over watch that anglo-saxon propaganda and the constant and unrealistic french-bashing.
It is not based on real history, is based of the Shakespeare play so you could probably do a bit of research before claiming the movie is propaganda.
@@davidturner6280 Shakespear was still more historical accurate, than tjis garbage.
Shakespear based his work on hidtorical events
Do you have to go to every single video and post the same comments?
Doesn't the film end with treachery in Henry's ranks, and wisdom and righteousness being demonstrated by the French?
I'd say this film is more on the side of shining too good a light on Henry than it is guilty of any particular shade on the French.
I see these comments about French bashing all the time on videos about this film. But actually I see no French bashing here. In fact, other than the Dauphin, the French characters are reflected very well. I think you are being a bit overly sensitive....
The wig was terrible lmao
Thats not wig
he sounds like tom Holland in British