My Best MH Wilds Settings for PC!! [RTX 4060TI + Ryzen 7 7700X]
ฝัง
- เผยแพร่เมื่อ 10 ก.พ. 2025
- Don't forget to leave a like if you enjoyed!
Subscribe for more! / @lordviettner
#MHWilds #MonsterHunterWilds #LordViettner
Things to remember:
1. These are my opinions on performance, I may be happy with 70-90fps, you may not, it's all very subjective.
2. This video is purely to inform you on what I liked the best, and what worked best for my PC setup!
3. Results may vary based on your GPU/CPU, you may have to downgrade a bit more on lower end hardware, or you may be able to raise the settings higher if you have a better PC than me!
Full PC Specs:
MoBo - MSI B650 Tomahawk
RAM - 32GB Corsair DDR5 (4x8GB)
CPU - Ryzen 7 7700X
GPU - RTX 4060ti Monster Hunter Edition
Power Supply - Pystar 850W 80+ Gold
Storage - Samsung 970 EVO Plus 2TB NVMe
Monitors - AOC 32", 1080p 165Hz & Acer 32", 1440p 165Hz
Find LordViettner on my socials:
Find all my socials, as well as discounts and affiliate links for MH Games here: linktr.ee/lord...
Discord: lordviettner
Join My Discord Server!!! / discord
Nexus Store: www.nexus.gg/l...
Patreon: www.patreon.com/LordViettner
If you're interested in supporting my channel, you can either donate here: streamelements...
or shop for games using my Nexus link above, as I get a small portion of that sale :D
You can also support the channel on Patreon for only $1 a month!
Killing Time by Kevin MacLeod is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 license. creativecommon...
What are you doing down this far, go leave a comment since you wanna scroll ;) Be nice to each other down there!
PLEASE READ THESE NOTES!!!!
Things to remember:
1. These are my opinions on performance, I may be happy with 70-90fps, you may not, it's all very subjective.
2. This video is purely to inform you on what I liked the best, and what worked best for my PC setup! This doesn't guarantee results, but will help similar setups quite a bit (12.6% FPS increase for my setup)!
3. Results may vary based on your GPU/CPU, you may have to downgrade a bit more on lower end hardware, or you may be able to raise the settings higher if you have a better PC than me!
4. Had a slight mixup in my info: DLSS 4 is not yet available for Wilds (it's supposed to be supported on launch), so the benchmark can currently use DLSS 3.7, which you can enable from your NVidia app by going to graphics, adding the Wilds Benchmark to your list of games from your file explorer, going to DLSS, and enabling "Latest"
5. I did update my settings to get a true 1440p image without having to change display to 1080p, I did have to drop to mostly Medium Settings, but the image looks sharper! So, if you want 1440p, I recommend: Resolution - 1440p; NVidia Reflex - Enable + Boost; DLSS - Balanced; Texture Filtering - Highest; Fur Quality - up to High; Sky Quality - Lowest; Render Distance - Highest; Distant Shadow - Low; Ambient Occlusion - High; 3rd page all the same as the video.
- these settings got me an "excellent" rating, 28.2k score, and 82.65 average FPS with no FrameGen! ( imgur.com/a/m2vdkzH )
you should always max the texture filtering option, it does not impact performance and improves the image quality significantly
good to know!
I have an AMD Ryzen 7 5700X cpu, AMD RX 6700 XT gpu, and a 1440p ultrawide monitor. I set upscaling to quality, NO frame gen, all other settings were medium to low. Benchmark was an Excellent score and averaged almost 80fps. It did dip to 50-55fps in the scene with all the grass, trees, and a lot of small monsters everywhere. Definitely playable for me. I might still have to upgrade gpu this year though.
@@cranknnutz i have the same config, thanks for sharing the results!
Please keep in mind that the game is very cpu intensive, so you may have trouble hitting higher frames if you don't upgrade your cpu even with better gpu.
I hope Capcom considers further improving performance because, as it is, the game is veeeery cpu bottlenecked.
Dont forget that we're supposed to get performance updates on release (supposedly >:D), but yes! Its much much better than the 1st beta!
@@cranknnutz this game really u required to have frame generation so 4000 series
how, my 7600X dips to 30fps, GPU constant 70%, 1440p
Running a 7800X3D and 7900XT and could not get it to sit at 100fps without frame gen. Until I realized there were three pages of graphics settings from this video...
Needless to say, thank you!
Fun fact, the new 5080 card could be reclassified as 5060.
Explanation -
If we still use the same classification system as the 1080ti generation.
The 1060 had about 33% of core count of the big bad gpu of its time , the Titan XP.
The 5080 had about 43% of core count of complete die(10752/24576cores), and about 49.4%of 5090 cores.
It highlights how insane the GPU market has become.
The best advice I can give anyone is to go down to 1080p, turn off or lower all the things you won't notice/don't care about, and screw around with it. Don't just give up after one or two tries.
My 3060ti managed to hover around 70 once I played around with it. When I enabled FSR, it hovered around 90/100 so don't give up.
And don't forget they will always be optimizing the game as time goes on.
Thank you for this, I have the exact same specs so this really helped me out to further optimize my settings for performance
It's all about finding what works for your setup.
With my tinkered settings I was gettingg 1440p native with a score of 18.6k.
With your settings 1080p with DLSS I got under 17k with a lower average FPS.
very true! there will definitely be variance based on everyone's individual PC setups and hardware (see pinned comment) :D
Right off the bat you shouldn’t lower your resolution like that. Upscaling (DLSS in your case) already takes care of that with superior image quality and potentially even more performance if you run DLSS Performance at 1440p.
Applied some of these changes onto my rig, it ran even better! Thanks dude! 💙
glad to hear!
While I have no need to be so detailed in my own selections thanks to my hardware, I am so endlessly thankful to the degree of detail that Capcom has gone through for the graphics options in this game. Being able to preview the changes makes figuring out how much you're willing to sacrifice for the sake of frames is so helpful.
I wish every AAA game went through the effort to provide such settings previews.
YES! the ability to see what lowering or raising each setting will both look like and do for my CPU/GPU/VRAM usage is a game-changer. The Monster Hunter dev team just does not miss
The amd fsr frame gen seems to be working well with my rtx 3090 at 4k res with Ray tracing high. Just a thought for those with 30 series cards that don't have access to dlss 3 yet
3090 Ultrawide Monitor - I made some similar changes, especially on shadows (real life shadows don't tend to be super crisp if you think about it). There are a few other changes I made too... got about 5 more FPS on average, and some of your suggestions are good and I'm sure would help a lot too. Helpful video!
I tried this and it is acceptable (3060 Ti, around 65fps avg.), but only with DLSS off. I will rather turn all my settings down to medium or low before I use any kind of upscaling, it hurts my eyes how bad it looks even on Quality, especially the village part, it looks like PS2 graphics.
The performance is substantially better for me. I have an i7 11700 and a 3070 and on high setting with frame gen im getting like 110-120fps with dips into the 70s
Looking like any time multiple models (players, monsters etc) are rendered its going to bog down the CPU. Glad I went with the R7 7700x this summer as its probably got enough power to get trough the launch hiccups.
The benchmarking tool is an awesome value add, but with 50% of it being in cutscenes I'm not going to trust the results screen to heavily. I care mostly about gameplay and will likely have to make further adjustments once we get in-game and have to deal with all the particle effects that they (intentionally?) omitted from this test.
yeah hard to say how accurate the results will be for gameplay, but a friend of mine said "combat can't be worse than the village [at the end of the benchmark]" and that's probably very true xD
@@LordViettner my worry is that the village is an indicator of what Raid performance is going to look like. Super worried about what a Safi'Jiiva level encounter is going to do to all of our rigs.
the new trailer of Arkveld showcases a ton of particle effects as well so hopefully the beta tomorrow will give a good idea how the game handles visually demanding fights.
@@bobnewkirk7003 yeah unfortunately I highly doubt the beta will give a good idea of how the full game will run Arkveld's fight, as it has none of the performance optimizations and none of the weapon changes.
Ooh, I'm gonna try these settings tomorrow
let me know how they work!
@LordViettner Will do! I got a Ryzen 7 5700G and a Radeon 6700XT and I'm confused why the benchmark is doing so poorly. Also get massive screen tearing.
@@JeannieLove yeah very odd, have you tried with AMD FSR turned on? Also, if you're running multiple monitors, try just having your desktop up on any monitors you're not running the game on. That helped me squeeze out some extra frames :D
@LordViettner Just my 7 year old UHD 4k smart tv.
@@JeannieLove ah if you're using a TV you're gonna have issues, especially if you're trying to play in 4K. Try running it at 1440p (in the display section of the options) with FSR set to balanced or performance
I have AMD Ryzen 7 8845HS, GeForce RTX 4050 laptop gpu, 16gb.
I’m getting around average 61.73 fps with a score of 21029, with any grassy area causing the frames to drop around 40-50 fps.
Currently trying to play with the settings to try to get better consistent fps while keeping it around medium setting.
I was at 82 fps and I didn't mess with the settings so after watching this I'm definitely changing some things and I should be even better
Did you get this PC on I buy power? I've been trying to get a new pc since mine was old and found a PC similar to your's. If this is the PC you are using then i might end up getting this.
no I built it myself haha, been slowly upgrading it over the last 5 years
Hello ty for sharing felt to me like the beta test as a Benchmark not gonna lie same Performance no matter which setting 😂
@@Gin___toxic whats your specs?
@saintitchief
ryzen 2700x
GTX 1660 super
16gb ram
Sata ssd
Rly old specc but yeah actually the same Performance as the beta if they did improve Something i should have noticed. Guess they didnt
Greetings
@@Gin___toxic Then your cpu was probably bottlenecking you
@@Hostefar na i checked in lower Resolution same result CPU was sitting on 40 up to 60% usage all cores if one would hit 99 yeah but it wasnt the case Game just runs and looks worse than iceborne Texture wise.
Yep, the performance of the benchmark is the same as the beta. I've got a 4090 and 5950x and the amount of VRAM required for this game is INSANE. 22gb of VRAM used at high/ultra is absolutely unacceptable. That said, I got a whopping 80 fps at 1440p, also unacceptable lol
I changed the DLSS with dlss swapper to the new DLSS and while performance isn't much better the visual quality is.
I can’t believe I missed this vid. I have a 4070 TI I’m wondering if changing to 1080 would be worth it for me
i was able to get it running in 1440p with DLSS at similar/better FPS, but on mostly medium settings, check the pinned comment for what i changed :D
Replacing the DLSS dlls with the new transformer model gives a 10% uplift and damn DLSS Q looks very close to native ad DLSS P looks like DLSS Q
@@EngRigz where did you manage to get the dlls for the transformer model?
the problem is that in the real game, we have to take the Denuvo gamble of performance fuckery
Denuvo sucks, hopefully someone will figure out a bypass or a performance boost like we had in World
Noted imm wait a year to get this game 1 to upgrade to the 5000 series 2 wait for the game to get more optimized hopefully and have dlcs to the story or new areas besides just sand
There isn't much headroom in raster performance. Just 20 frames of difference from Ultra to Lowes in native resolution. That is ridiculous.
sounds like it could be a CPU bottleneck? not 100% sure but I have like a 80+fps difference between highest (57 avg fps) and lowest settings (141 avg fps)
@@LordViettner I think setting it to lowest through the preset options may turn on frame gen
Game is passively cpu bound, yup.
I've got 24.5k score with 72 average fps on rtx 4060 ti, i5-14600kf in 1440p with default high settings. I've also used dlss 4 performance and it looks as good as old quality while running much better. No frame gen
7800x3d and a 4070ti with nvme and ddr5 32. Think ill be alright. I did play a beta test with zero monster spoilers so i got an idea ill be fine running the game without sloppy dlss and taa trash
yeah if you can run the beta fine, the full game will run even smoother. my FPS on the benchmark with no frame gen is better than DLSS (performance) AND frame gen on the beta :D
I just have a hard time believing the benchmark. Whilst a lot of stuff is displayed, there really should've been a combat section.
I feel like the cutscenes are skewing the performance
I was in a discord call with a friend, and I said the exact same thing. He said "well the combat performance can't be worse than the village at the end" and that honestly ended my worries xD Combat should be around or better than the first jump down with all those small monsters and Quematrice rendered, if I had to guess
@LordViettner also how do I enable dlss 4? Running a rtx 4070, didn't know it was possible
@@SirJerray I had a slight mixup in my info, apparently DLSS 4 won't be available until launch (Feb 28th), currently it's on DLSS 3.7, you can check the pinned comment for how to enable the latest DLSS/FrameGen settings in the NVidia app!
try DLSS4 with 1440p and put DLSS on performance. Should be better quality at similar performance.
pinned comment
Is there a way to make sure you get at least 60fps of real frames before the gpu makes the fake frames?
Ambient occlusion is such a massive improvement in image quality. I would never turn it off all the way. Makes everything look flat.
totally up to you! I like it off, you like it on; it's subjective, you can certainly change anything here if you want! These are just my preferred settings :D
3060 12gb and i5 11600K and I'm struggling.. It's either the game looks ass (talking you can count pixels) and runs at about 90 fps or the game looks like something you can actually look at and not puke but runs at 40ish fps.
Broke 30k on a 3070 with your settings. Gonna update bios too, mine was a bit outdated and check again.
Got 31472 after bios update and also tried 1440p and got 26463. I belive it's totally playable on 1440p
@@MrPhyxsyus whats your cpu? I have the same gpu, i only get like 19000
idk what is going on at this point with gaming but this game looks like shit... sooo blurry at distance its like i need +3 glass diopter wtf... . I manage to score 2450 with my 6700 xt 73 av fps with your settings. nice video
GTX 1650 4gb
I5 11300
24gb of ram
I am struggling to even catch 10k score with everything on the lowest WITHOUT The image generator
Man.. I have a 3080 and im getting around the same score and my cpu is very similar.. an i7 12700k.. Im not even getting full Gpu usage unless I use 1440p quality dlss or my fps drops to 60ish. like Im bottlenecked.. the last scene where he walks through the village i get like 55fps and 80% usage.. what the hell.. 1440p quality nets me just 2 fps less then 1080p quality..time for an upgrade..
I got Good. Is that a good thing? I dont mean this as a joke.
" My best settings "
duh you got one of the best pc specs
not even close lmao, I have a good PC, but the best? not even a little, 4060 is the bottom of the 40 series and still below 3090 and 3080 and even the 3070ti
putting everything on ulta makes my game run at 120 fps, but godamit, I STILL CANT BELIEVE those numbers, i got a rt 6800 xt amd and a ryzen 5800x3d, maybe the benchmark its just not the real performance while gaming Ill use USE MULTIPLAYER a LOT, that means the fps will drop even more right?
it's a pretty accurate representation of how the full game will run, I would agree with your statement that some aspects of multiplayer may drop frames, but it shouldn't be by a ton
@@LordViettner welp its time to reunite all the hopes for the best LAUNCH possible, might even be a true contender for GAME OF THE YEAR. see you soon brother
@@Ersb99 I call bs or framegen (the same thing) on this one.
You certainly enabled framegen and didn't notice it.
@@jyubei_ichimonji unisex frame gen while gaming all the time, on some games it's extremely optimal, like Tekken 8, diablo 4 , etc, BUT OTHER GAMES, frame gen make them look terrible, I guess MH WILDS will be the good side of Fsr or dlss
U can try 1440p on balanced which still looks much better and runs almost similarly I think
I may give that a try, my card is much better at rendering 1080p, since it only has 8GB of VRAM
@@LordViettner aight good luck finding the sweet spot as I am struggling bouncing between high and medium with a 3060ti on 1440p balanced
@@LordViettner with dlss 1440 is obvious better. You should always set resolution the same as your monitor, then let dlss do the work
I’ve never played on a PC before, and I’m seriously considering getting my first one for wilds. I’m honestly really scared because I know nothing about parts or when/how to replace them. And I want to make sure to get a good one that will last.
I definitely want to go pre-built for my first so I don’t risk anything in the building process. Can anyone please recommend me a good place to start? 🙏🏼
pre-built is just as good these days, had a few friends go that way! I haven't personally done a pre-built, I've just upgraded my OG build over the last 5 years, so I'm not 100% sure where to start, but I had a friend get one directly off of Dell's website, and he hasn't had any issues
you'll still need to do research on the specs you want, but you won't have to deal with the hassle of learning building, what parts go together and what don't, buying a Windows key, etc
Honestly it entirely depends on your budget. Don't get any gpu with less than 12gb of vram. I would aim for an upper mid range GPU to give you some headroom for games that are difficult to run. I personally think the amd 7800xt is a great value, but I know not everyone can afford one. Nvidia GPUs are typically more expensive than AMD with $/performance. Though Nvidia does have a higher ceiling with performance though most normal people can't afford those cards and really shouldn't spend that much on them unless they do content creation.
Intel's CPUs have been plagued with issues recently, I would aim for getting a 9800x3d if you can find one, but a 7600x3d or 7800x3d is perfectly fine.
Get no less than 16gbs of RAM and 32gb should be more than enough for anyone.
Do not cheap out on a power supply. The last thing you want it a cheap power supply frying the rest of your system. 800 to 1000watts should cover just about any system. Though 750 is fine too if you don't pick high end parts.
It absolutely hates back ground anything and start ups 7800x3d and 4070ti im getting 125fps to 130fps on a 1440p at ultra preset. With Gen and DLSS on.
Anyone know the best settings for steam deck? If so PLS let me know
i have a 4070 super, could not find the option for DLSS4 in the NVIDIA control panel. The benchmark tool doesn't show in the list of applications
in the NVidia app itself, you go to Graphics, then you have to add the Benchmark from your steam library in file explorer, then you go to DLSS and set it to 'latest'
@@LordViettner i see, thanks you for that and thanks for the video, going to try your settings later
Idk if someone could help me with this, my specs are a 7900xtx, a ryzen 7 7800x3d 32gb of ram with the last drivers of my gpu and all running it in a 4k monitor running it in ultra and just as I enter the game theres input lag when I move the cursor is laggy and in my finals fps are 40-45 even tho I see people with the same rig as mine and also same settings with 80-100 fps. I dont really know what to do I try everything but it just keep getting the same: Input lag as soon as I load the menu and even during the benchmark, low fps in the results and a lot of drops too during the benchmark. If someone could help me out it will be a lifesave for me because I feel kinda dumb and lost without knowing what to do and seeing people getting better results than me. Also I bought my pc on december 2023 so it dosent have any old parts.
probably bc you're playing in 4K, most games don't run very high in 4K, as far as I know.
you could try turning on AMD FSR, that will help a little
@@LordViettner That could be right but I also try running the benchmark in 2k with fsr on and the difference was just 10 frames more just 10 I dont really know what could be the problem, could it be the gpu is broken I dont really know man I feeling frustrating right no.
How do you enable DLSS 4 I can't see Wilds Benchmark in my Nvidia App?
@amberow9892 exaxtly why in the video he is saying that DLSS 4 is activated? 🤔
DLSS 4 isn't enabled in Wilds yet, it supposedly will be at launch. You can run DLSS 3.7, by going to your NVidia app, go to graphics, add the benchmark to it from your file explorer, and go to DLSS and enable "Latest"
@@LordViettner I tried but it keeps on reverting to 3d app settings after I switch it to Latest. What do you think is the problem?
@@ChesterChanco So, what I noticed from my 4.5+ hours in the benchmarking tool is that it always resets all the settings, so the NVidia app also gets reset. It's very finnicky to get it to stay on
Not having the option for fullscreen excusive is bananas
i never run fullscreen exclusive, again, that's just me, but i have a 3 monitor setup and I am usually swapping between them for Wiki's or Discord or other apps anyway, so fullscreen borderless is always what I run :D
@@LordViettner I see. I've noticed that I get much better FPS when running games in fullscreen exclusive. I only have one monitor, as in my TV. I play with a controller from from my sofa ^_^
@@GUOMENTAREVIEWS normal people like to alt tab without black screens
@GUOMENTAREVIEWS that's probably why you notice it more due to being a TV. They have more issues not being fullscreen exclusive than a monitor does due to how they are programmed. Also refresh rates on tvs varry compared to monitors usually
@@Tory-JJ I'm so sorry, I didn't mean to annoy you from the other side of the world! I will now change to bordeless windowed too! Again, I'm so sorry for having the wrong personal preferences :(
How accurate is the benchmark going to be compared to release ? Idk how do benchmarks compared to ingame performance.
very accurate, as far as we know, the benchmark was pulled directly from the full game. it will be FAR more indicative of final performance compared to the open beta
I want to add as a side note here that we do not see combat with lots of sporadically changing elements. So i'd assume at least 10% loss vs benchmark
i think it's going be pretty accurate, its pulled from the game and not a baked spliced bs. Maybe a little dip in few frames during super intensive scene with lots of fx and combats.
@@SirJerray I highly doubt combat will be a 10% drop from either the village or the starting area of the Windward Plains, you'll likely only have 1-3 monsters rendered in, whereas in the Benchmark we have tons of small monsters and a Quematrice, followed by 3 Doshaguma and a Balahara at the same time. Combat won't eat 10% off of that, not even close, it doesn't even drop much in the beta, which is HORRID on performance xD
@LordViettner very reassuring to hear!
Currently R5 7600 RX7800XT 32gb ram and gaming on 1440p. I should be fine. Thanks for the video.
You run benchmark yet? I have the same setup, but my internet is crap, so haven't had a chance to run it yet.
@-Boone I haven't. But, based on @LordViettner. Results I should have similar score.
@@-Boone R5 7500f asrock7900xt
gonna run the benchmark ina a few minutes
@@-BooneI have r7 7700, 7800xt, 1080p and the game will definitely be playable, but barely clings on to 60fps without upscaling or FG in the most demanding parts of the benchmark. I used similar settings to those shown in the video. With FSR AA and fake frames enabled I was getting 120-180 fps. It should definitely be playable with your setup and will probably look better and run similarly if you use FSR upscaled to 1440p with FG enabled.