Reneging on a Deal
ฝัง
- เผยแพร่เมื่อ 3 ต.ค. 2024
- The plaintiff says he hired the defendant to replace the shutters on his house and paid him in full, but then he only completed half the job. He’s suing him for what he’s owed. The defendant says the plaintiff ordered shutters that were the wrong size and wanted the defendant to rehire all his workers and go back a second time to install them for free.
Case: 31-368
![[Full Episode] The Restaurant War Thailand ศึกพ่อค้าซ่าแม่ค้าแซ่บ Episode 2 | 29 ก.ย. 67](http://i.ytimg.com/vi/r3lfLNH6Ke4/mqdefault.jpg)
I’m shocked Harvey didn’t introduce this case with “Shutter? I hardly know her!”
😄
that's not Harvey.
@@QS0924 sometimes it be Harvey sometimes it be dude when they walk out of the courtroom
@@ccrow86 I think Curt Chaplin is the narrators voice-over... he is the younger of the two who do the exit interviews along with the original 'court reporter' Doug Llewelyn (I believe that if Curt Chaplin is on screen, it indicates the clip is pre-2016). Harvey is the 'legal reporter' and the only one of the three who's passed the bar.
@@QS0924 yes it is. The announcement in the beginning where he says the case name is definitely Harvey
I can bet he thinks he is never at fault for anything. You pay for THEIR time just like YOU get paid for your time.
i get that sense as well, i doubt he knows much about/ respects blue collar work
People with money sure don't like to see those Benjamins leave their wallets. Cheap Cheap 🤣😂
The plaintiff is an arrogant person. I get the feeling he thinks tradesmen are below him. I'd be curious to know if his shutters lasted through any big winds.
Plaintiff didn't see any value in defendants time. That's what got him the verdict. Totally disrespectful plaintiff.
exactly! self entitled jerk.
The plaintiff really tried to nickel and dime the contractor when he is the one that made the mistake.
👍
fr!! Kept using “we” when asked about HIS mistakes! 🤦🏻♀️
The plaintiff looks prosperous, owns a bigass house and is suing for $150. How miserly can you get? He was even too cheap to pay for the contractor's trip to Lowe's to pick up materials. The richer some people get, the piggier they get.
Fair ruling by JM. The plaintiff would have saved everyone involved the trouble had he just used that money to buy the correct ladder. Plus, had the situation been switched he would have wanted the same as the defendant for his time. Sometimes its important to imagine yourself in the other persons shoes. Self reflection is something we seldom use enough of and usually from my own experiences it saves me from letting my emotions rule over what’s right and what’s right here is the men being paid for their time.
Completely fair ruling, if the customer messes up then that's their fault and not the fault of the contractor. To be honest, if it was me, I would have actually given the guys a tip for my mistakes and for being understanding and willing to come back out.
The plaintiff is arrogant. If his employer did the same thing to him he would do everything to get his money. Grow up dopey.
The plaintiff has some nerve damn cheapskate!
👍
100% agreed. The customer was lying about not looking up the shutters at Lowe's and sending them to pickup the order.
I LOVED THE SMILE ON THE JUDGES FACE WHEN THE PLAINTIFF MENTIONS HOW HE WAS AN AMZING GUY FOR OFFERING TO LOAN THEM A DRILL BIT. C’MON DUDE, REALLY!
GOOD RULING JUDGE MILIAN. 🙂👍🏼 🇬🇧
Plaintiff made himself look badly on TV AND TH-cam..worse on TH-cam because we all can comment and tell him haha…plaintiff probably expects to be paid for his job…so does the defendant…why was that so hard for the plaintiff to see that?
👍
Absolutely fair ruling. The plaintiff is cheap and needs to understand that construction guys are valuable.
An authentically and genuinely piece of work
😂🤣😂🤣😂😂
If wrong was a person it's the plaintiff.
The nerve 🙄🙄🙄
Lol the plaintiff said "we made a mistake". Noooo, YOU made a mistake. Just another ridiculous human.
I can't believe this guy wanted a refund...but being that he's such a penny pincher it kinda makes sense.
Didn't know we could still say reneging 🤣
Why not?
Don’t be dumb
My shutters booo hooo waaaan waaan boo hoo. You ordered the wrong shutters. You wasted his time. You screwed up
7:55 A lot of people think it's just time on the job site... That is not the case. It takes time to pick up the parts at the warehouse, it takes time to drive to the site, and It takes time to load and unload materials.
I did a job that I quoted $50.00 to install a glass shower door. It should've taken less than an hour to complete, but with the missing parts and the specialty tools I had to purchase, that $50.00 job cost me 150.00 with travel time, materials, and part runs. That was on me for thinking It would be a simple install. I wasn't told it was a new shower door setup!
"I dont remember saying that"
Dude, wasnt even 2 minutes ago.
This defendant is just lucky enough to be alive looking at his disposition here after having a heart attack more than anything else. Men take care of yourselves first and foremost. I cannot state that any more emphatically. Milian's ruling was more than fair here.
Well put!!! Men please take care of yourselves and get regular check ups. I had a massive stroke in 2013 so I first hand what the defendant is going through.
My dad neglected his health and died within a year after having a stroke. Now my husband is doing the same thing- never going to the Dr when he needs to. Why are y’all so stubborn?
@@NotAllButMost Just perhaps if you show your husband our stories just maybe he will take heed... hopefully
@@NotAllButMost My Father was the same way.
👁👁💋💋
He was too busy to go himself to correct his first mistake and so sends them off to buy another mistake and he then thinks his mistakes should be compensated by the contractor, what planet does he come from?...
Ten seconds in - OMG! I hate this plaintiff! I hope he loses.....
💯
I cannot believe he brought him to court.
YESSSSSS I LOVED THOS CASE THE PLAINTIFF W/ THE PRIVILEGED ENTITLED ATTITUDE WANTING SOMETHING FOR NOTHING I'M GLAD THAT YHE DEFENDANT STOOD HIS GROUND ALTHOUGH HE DOESN'T LOOK WELL KEPT W/ THAT DANDRUFF ALL OVER HIS BLK SHIRT EITHER WAY GOOD CALL JUDGE
I can’t believe the plaintiff. Did you notice how he conveniently used the word ‘we’ bought the wrong one etc.?
I would have charged extra too ! He’s the type of person who prob has a ton of money and nickels and dimes everyone around them who’s less than .
Coming back a second time starts a new job!
Lol she’s so mean to her husband but in a loving way.
I 100% can see Judge John being a non-fiction book snob and Judge Milian loving fiction thrillers. I need to get into reading forreal, apparently it makes you smarter!
Happy hump day everyone! 😉🍻
Gentle savior 85
Why wasn't there an interview of the litigants in this case?
Good morning y’all
Good morning beautiful
Goodmorning
Sorry but working in the construction field, the contractor has to pay his workers while on site regardless of what they do on site. It was the Plaintiff's fault for having the incorrect shutters, he should pay him for his extra time. He already went through the bidded 2 hours.
Never had anything to do with shutters in my life nor am I trained in any kind of construction work or woodworking whatsoever.
Just looking at the photo even a complete amateur like me, can SEE that the lower shutters are quite a bit longer than the upper ones…!
Besides that, still being that uneducated amateur that I am, I would think that whenever someone’s going to do a project like that, they would ALWAYS measure each window before ordering new shutters!
Anyone who chooses to stay on the ground and simply trying to ‘eye’ the sizes from there, is just plain LAZY!
What a goon…!
An arrogant goon at that!
OMGawsh the plaintiff never picked up what the judge was putting down with his dumb pointless responses lol
It sounds like the defendant had been very reasonable with the plaintiff during the job. The defendant went to Lowes and got the shutters. He drove the distance to get there and to this clowns house. The plaintiff is absolutely ridiculous.
The plaintiff is crazy azell if he thinks he can make a mistake, and then these guys have to come back to correct HIS mistake, for free. Even if the defendant had agreed to that, he has someone working with him, who I’m sure he has to pay also. The time that he wasted could have been used on another job. And him harping on that dang drill bit was just plain annoying. So what you “let” them use yours. It was to benefit you anyway. It’s a stinkin’ bit, what do you want…a cookie? 🙄
Plaintiff comes off as a snob
customers who don't think your time is worth anything aren't your customer base.
So many people seem to think it's only worth the cost of the actual labor without regard to what it takes to run a business, have employees, have insurance, have a license, have workman's comp, have equipment ... basically do the things they can't, but they only want to pay the company for the labor time and what they think it's worth are the bane of every small business owner.
To expect them to run your errands when you've made a mistake in ordering, pick up and deliver the correct item, eat the gas, labor cost and time and then come back and finish the job with the correct items for no additional cost ... pfft, no.
Business owners, especially small business owners need to do better where it comes to picking their client base and say "sorry, can't help you" to people like this man. He was trying to get everything done as cheap as possible and is willing to cheat someone to do it.
Americans have become a new level of entitled. As a business owner mysel (gem dealer and jeweler), I deal with this type of thing all the time. I have clients who think I should make them designs for free (or additional different designs) or give them 1hr consultations for free or will have me write them an invoice and then along the way they will make several major changes and think the price shouldn't change.
The plaintiff is cheap I offer 50.00 dollars to come back and finish job. What a joke defendant didn't do anything wrong what so ever
He’s mad because he realized he didn’t have to pay anyone at all. Why didn’t you borrow a ladder from the beginning? Not his problem.
Nickel and dime at the expense of the defendants time. Plaintiffs mistake so pay for it but it might cut into his night out driving his BMW.
Typical homeowner expecting a builder to eat the cost of their dumb mistake.
Plaintiff hates losing lol
The defendant looks scary ! Why doesn’t he blink ?
soon as i heard him say he ordered wrong shutters, i was like well why u here?
Yes, I love Judge!
Im not paying for time it takes you to load your tools. Sorry.
Thanks for the James Grippando tip!
What a ridiculous lawsuit.
What a tight A. $300 lousy dollars ffs.
Having a stroke is a big deal, I had a girlfriend that had a stroke doing Jui Jitsu, it affected half her face. It could’ve been a lot worse,
What a greedy plaintiff
Seems many people are hiring unlicensed handymen to do jobs on the cheap, then eventually end up paying what they would have paid a professional in the first place. The jobs are either incomplete, not done correctly, or there is a dispute over the SOW. Seems people are allergic to contracts.
What part of what you've said relates to this case?
I do not like the Plaintiff!
Dark soldier 72
You can rent a ladder.
Kind dolphin 52
Intelligente snake 20
🤣🤣🤣
.
He was happy that there would be no charge to run to Lowes, but doesn't seem to think they deserve to be paid for showing up in the first place. He definitely hates to see money flow out of his pockets.
He's bum that expects someone to take his mistakes on the chin.
I like JM but she throws her hubby under the bus alot
Not "we" made an honest mistake......
Лайк
So we meet again my PC family
9:50 he must be related to Donald Trump? Yes, you did say that!
This man couldn't be bothered to wear a clean shirt at a court appearance? Smh
IKR! I was thinking “LINT ROLLER” the whole time!!
Chill out it’s not that serious. Who the hell cares
@@foreverever9001 my eyes care, it looks disgusting
The plaintiff seemed to be more on the defendant's side with that testimony. Lol
Intelligente mother 56
Some ppl don't play with their money even tho the time sent getting it back is more valuable that the amount
I wouldn't give the defendant a penny those eyes say I just had my pill 😆
Did you not hear the part where he had a stroke?
I don’t agree at all. The plaintiff should have paid for gas and mileage for the return trip but to pay a total of $600 for a $300 job is BS. Also, it shouldn’t take an hour to load tools and a ladder. I feel bad that he had a stroke but the client shouldn’t have to pay just because it takes him longer.
He was going to finish the job for $150, not another $300. That covers the worker. And if he had a stroke and is doing the packing himself then yeah it takes time. He wasn’t charging hourly he was just saying that it’s not a quick drive over like the plaintiff was claiming.
Don't quit your day job. You don't have a clue, just like the plaintiff
Ehh, now I've seen her many times make the contractor give back the $$ if the job wasn't done. The plaintiff should have received some money back. I know damn good and well he didn't pay his worker no 150 for the 2 hours of work 😒.
Look at it this way: you babysit for someone. And they say they don’t like how you watched their child. Would you honestly say ‘okay, here is 1/2 of my pay back?’. No you wouldn’t.
What in the world are you going on about. He spent the same time maybe more on the client's mistakes as he would have doing the job. His worker needs to be paid for his time regardless and the business has a right to make a profit. If the job wasn't done because of a delay in traffic or the contractors truck broke down that's a differ scenario.
Хвхвахп
Just looking at that guy I wouldn’t trust him working on my house
The way someone looks has nothing to do with whether or not they are trustworthy. The defendant had a stroke.
@@inthemouthofmadness5910 oh wow thank you for that input. Guess this case proved that wrong
Pink test 88
Time is money!!