Very well done! I don't know if it is some kind of technical problem but it took me some time to find out that Mr. Dore was talking about magmatism because it always sounds like magnetism.
41:10 the sediment content isn´t that suprising? It´s more about the sheer load those rivers discharged. On the other hand it´s the consequence of a massive increase in water vapour resulting from a huge increase in atmospheric CO²? Gigant storm systems formig over the 2/3s of the globe spaning tropical ocean- that´s kind of what a tempest tossed sea looks. Atmospheric rivers forming equaly elaborate "deltas"... Thanks for pointing out even the rocks themselfs can exprience sudden drastic regime shifts and everything flows in this strange river of time.
Very well done! Thank you for sharing this out. I’ve wondered why the eastern margin of the Jurassic central Atlantic is so sharp compared to portions of the old Laurentian margin found in the western Great Basin of the US, models in your talk give reasonable end members to contemplate.
I think another factor related to the breakup of Pangea could be Organic Collapse. The weight from the mountains caused the crust to be pushed into the Mantle. Together with melt from the slab break off could have caused an enormous amount of magma. Crustal delimitation from the weight of the Appalachian Mountains along with slab break off slowly started to find cracks as the Appalachian Mountains eroded, lessening crustal thickness.
@grindupBaker The mountain range is so dense and massive due to continental collision, its weight forces the Lithosphere into the Mantle. A good example of this today are the Himalayas. The Lithosphere under the mountains is thinning. This is due to the mountain ranges massive weight. Slowly, the mantle eats away at the Lithosphere, and at some point in the next few million years, a rift will form and begin tearing India and Asian apart.
The Expanding Earth Theory and Abiotic Oil must be considered to understand Plate Techtonics. What is the proof that Earth has always been the same size?
The Earth is definitely expanding. The "plate tectonics theory" is a poor fantasy. The continents do not occasionally float or drift. In fact, the continents move apart forever after the break of Pangea about 160-170 mln years ago. To know the truth, two global programs should be carried out on a planetary basis: 1) accurate and adequate measurements of the Earth size; 2) accurate measurements of the gravity acceleration. And we will know the proper answer in ten years or so!
it was not always the same size. we lost a considerabe amount of mass and water to space during the flood. and fossil fuels are definitley real, but theres oceans of oil in our solar system not on earth, so there is obviously an abiotic component to it as well. Hydroplate theory explains our world much better than uniformitarianism and traditional plate tectonics. I think its crazy we base our worldview off uneducated 1800s peoples theorys
@grindupBaker i wonder if people in the medieval warm period or little ice age blamed sin or c02? its crazy what peoples religions will make you think, though i freely admit i believe in catastrophism over uniformitarianism remember all the fear mongering in the early 2000s, how miami would be gone now? well, even before then in the 70s, all the fear mongering was for the next iceage. the more things change the more they stay the same
@@originaldcjensen Right? I've seen these expanding earth cranks in comments a few times now; where are they even coming from? Lots seem to like mentioning abiotic oil too, is it some religious young Earth apologetics thing?
"Precision is not Accuracy", so Observable Precision is not necessarily an accurately described explanation when it's "not even wrong" relative-timingat all scales and distance distribution holography-quantization simultaneously. Why should it be? Superimposed QM-TIME Chemistry bonding probability is complicated and messy superposition, as is inadvertently shown by this video of crustal ages and supposition. Interesting geological surveys.
Questions: doest the mid oceanic ridge look much more like a tension crack than spreading? also, where does the force to subduct all the material come from, where does the material go, and how does the process of subduction overcome the friction of the mass being subducted, addionoally, how does the mass being subducted not break due to having its compresisive strength fail? also, doesnt it seem like the continents line up better with mid oceanic ridge than the other continents themselves?
I think it is a tension crack as much as anything else. You need a good video on subduction. Gravity makes the heavier ocean crust subduct under the lighter continental crust into the mantel. The subducting crust is quickly affected by growing heat and pressure changing its properties, making it more ductile until melting it. The mid-ocean ridge is a breaking point in a previously continous plate, often loosely based on a previous breaking point. Tear a piece of paper in half. The best fit of the two pieces is along the tear.
It always occured to me that Pangea looks like a perfect circle. I do not know why nobody else made this connection. Remember we are seeing these maps on a flat surface not on a globe. Some maps show the round shape more than others. One has to add another continent near where the Tethys sea is depicted. As to why this is so I have no idea. Maybe it may have formed when the moon separated from the Earth leaving a bulge, like when you separate a piece of dough from a larger piece.
There is no bulge from the moon separating because at the time the Earth was molten and even that was probably initiated by Thea merging with the Earth.
An asteroid with a diameter of approximately 300 km to 500 km falls in the Democratic Republic of Congo and collides with Earth! The asteroid falls at an angle of 48 degrees and passes through the Earth. As it passes through the Earth's mantle, two donut mantle convection currents occur. One is an underwater mountain range (rift valley, ridge) that extends from the Indian Ocean to the Atlantic Ocean. The second is the Pacific submarine mountain range (oceanic ridge, rift valley). Donut mantle rises due to heat! So, when it meets the crust, the crust separates. The remaining submarine mountains (rift valleys) are caused by two donut mantle convections following the Himalayan asteroid impact. In other words, the asteroid fell into the sea east of South Africa (now Tanzania). As it pierced the Earth and passed through the Ural Mountains, two donut mantle convection currents occurred. The angle fell at an angle. The first donut mantle convection created underwater landforms from the Australian South Sea, underwater rift valleys (undersea mountain ranges), and from the Philippine Sea to New Zealand. The second donut mantle convection gave rise to Arctic ocean ridges and rift valleys. In other words, two giant asteroids will fall and the continent will split (split)! Other large asteroid impacts have pulled or stretched convection currents in the otherwise circular donut mantle, causing the African continent to become uncircular! For reference, the primary vortex (donut mantle convection) of the asteroid that fell in the Democratic Republic of Congo, Africa, was cut off by the asteroid impact in the Himalayas. The tip of the cut donut mantle rose to become the island of Iceland.
@grindupBaker If the asteroid is about 100 kilometers in diameter, it has a core of its own. That's why doughnut mantle convection occurs twice. Once as the outer shell is shed, and twice as the core travels through the mantle! The Democratic Republic of Congo asteroid impacted Earth at an inclination of about 48 degrees. So it didn't hit the Earth's outer core!
we know now from NASA's DART mission that asteroids are a collection of ice and loose rubble (creationists predicted this) they also say the mid oceanic ridge was created when the water under the continents burst forth, it was created in one go, thats why it circumnavigates the earth and meets itself what you are not considering in your statement is magma crossover depth. at a certain depth magma sinks because it compresses more than solid rock around it.
So cool, so fascinating. I just love this stuff..tectonics, geology.
Very well done! I don't know if it is some kind of technical problem but it took me some time to find out that Mr. Dore was talking about magmatism because it always sounds like magnetism.
Very informative visual commentary - thank you.
41:10 the sediment content isn´t that suprising? It´s more about the sheer load those rivers discharged. On the other hand it´s the consequence of a massive increase in water vapour resulting from a huge increase in atmospheric CO²? Gigant storm systems formig over the 2/3s of the globe spaning tropical ocean- that´s kind of what a tempest tossed sea looks. Atmospheric rivers forming equaly elaborate "deltas"...
Thanks for pointing out even the rocks themselfs can exprience sudden drastic regime shifts and everything flows in this strange river of time.
Very well done! Thank you for sharing this out. I’ve wondered why the eastern margin of the Jurassic central Atlantic is so sharp compared to portions of the old Laurentian margin found in the western Great Basin of the US, models in your talk give reasonable end members to contemplate.
I love this stuff.
Pangea was surrounded by subduction zones. Wow!
To what degree does sedimentation change the global carbon saturation of the atmosphere?
could the breakup of Pangaea be helped along by asteroid impact?
I think another factor related to the breakup of Pangea could be Organic Collapse. The weight from the mountains caused the crust to be pushed into the Mantle. Together with melt from the slab break off could have caused an enormous amount of magma. Crustal delimitation from the weight of the Appalachian Mountains along with slab break off slowly started to find cracks as the Appalachian Mountains eroded, lessening crustal thickness.
@grindupBaker The mountain range is so dense and massive due to continental collision, its weight forces the Lithosphere into the Mantle. A good example of this today are the Himalayas. The Lithosphere under the mountains is thinning. This is due to the mountain ranges massive weight. Slowly, the mantle eats away at the Lithosphere, and at some point in the next few million years, a rift will form and begin tearing India and Asian apart.
The Expanding Earth Theory and Abiotic Oil must be considered to understand Plate Techtonics. What is the proof that Earth has always been the same size?
The Earth is definitely expanding. The "plate tectonics theory" is a poor fantasy. The continents do not occasionally float or drift. In fact, the continents move apart forever after the break of Pangea about 160-170 mln years ago.
To know the truth, two global programs should be carried out on a planetary basis: 1) accurate and adequate measurements of the Earth size; 2) accurate measurements of the gravity acceleration. And we will know the proper answer in ten years or so!
it was not always the same size. we lost a considerabe amount of mass and water to space during the flood. and fossil fuels are definitley real, but theres oceans of oil in our solar system not on earth, so there is obviously an abiotic component to it as well. Hydroplate theory explains our world much better than uniformitarianism and traditional plate tectonics. I think its crazy we base our worldview off uneducated 1800s peoples theorys
@grindupBaker i wonder if people in the medieval warm period or little ice age blamed sin or c02? its crazy what peoples religions will make you think, though i freely admit i believe in catastrophism over uniformitarianism
remember all the fear mongering in the early 2000s, how miami would be gone now? well, even before then in the 70s, all the fear mongering was for the next iceage.
the more things change the more they stay the same
I see the tinfoil hat brigade was here.
@@originaldcjensen Right? I've seen these expanding earth cranks in comments a few times now; where are they even coming from? Lots seem to like mentioning abiotic oil too, is it some religious young Earth apologetics thing?
For an alternative view: th-cam.com/video/PQSrsy9xg70/w-d-xo.html
"Precision is not Accuracy", so Observable Precision is not necessarily an accurately described explanation when it's "not even wrong" relative-timingat all scales and distance distribution holography-quantization simultaneously. Why should it be? Superimposed QM-TIME Chemistry bonding probability is complicated and messy superposition, as is inadvertently shown by this video of crustal ages and supposition.
Interesting geological surveys.
There’s some weird statements in the comments . Creationist fantasy explanations and former but now refuted scientific theories
Questions: doest the mid oceanic ridge look much more like a tension crack than spreading? also, where does the force to subduct all the material come from, where does the material go, and how does the process of subduction overcome the friction of the mass being subducted, addionoally, how does the mass being subducted not break due to having its compresisive strength fail? also, doesnt it seem like the continents line up better with mid oceanic ridge than the other continents themselves?
I think it is a tension crack as much as anything else. You need a good video on subduction. Gravity makes the heavier ocean crust subduct under the lighter continental crust into the mantel. The subducting crust is quickly affected by growing heat and pressure changing its properties, making it more ductile until melting it. The mid-ocean ridge is a breaking point in a previously continous plate, often loosely based on a previous breaking point. Tear a piece of paper in half. The best fit of the two pieces is along the tear.
It always occured to me that Pangea looks like a perfect circle. I do not know why nobody else made this connection. Remember we are seeing these maps on a flat surface not on a globe. Some maps show the round shape more than others. One has to add another continent near where the Tethys sea is depicted. As to why this is so I have no idea. Maybe it may have formed when the moon separated from the Earth leaving a bulge, like when you separate a piece of dough from a larger piece.
It wasn't a perfect circle, unless you draw it without enough evidence and dash it out.
There is no bulge from the moon separating because at the time the Earth was molten and even that was probably initiated by Thea merging with the Earth.
Pangea is Antarctica
just a theory
If you mean "plate tectonics", it's not a theory. It's a poor fantasy.
Meanwhile the Earth is expanding. And its mass is growing also.
@@Anatoly-Cherepproof? Until then. Just a troll.
Bullshit
Read. You may learn.
What’s your theory?
Pangea is one of antarticas
North pole is moving a few inches a year and dragging sun to another landmass
An asteroid with a diameter of approximately 300 km to 500 km falls in the Democratic Republic of Congo and collides with Earth!
The asteroid falls at an angle of 48 degrees and passes through the Earth.
As it passes through the Earth's mantle, two donut mantle convection currents occur.
One is an underwater mountain range (rift valley, ridge) that extends from the Indian Ocean to the Atlantic Ocean.
The second is the Pacific submarine mountain range (oceanic ridge, rift valley).
Donut mantle rises due to heat! So, when it meets the crust, the crust separates.
The remaining submarine mountains (rift valleys) are caused by two donut mantle convections following the Himalayan asteroid impact.
In other words, the asteroid fell into the sea east of South Africa (now Tanzania).
As it pierced the Earth and passed through the Ural Mountains, two donut mantle convection currents occurred.
The angle fell at an angle.
The first donut mantle convection created underwater landforms from the Australian South Sea, underwater rift valleys (undersea mountain ranges), and from the Philippine Sea to New Zealand.
The second donut mantle convection gave rise to Arctic ocean ridges and rift valleys.
In other words, two giant asteroids will fall and the continent will split (split)!
Other large asteroid impacts have pulled or stretched convection currents in the otherwise circular donut mantle, causing the African continent to become uncircular!
For reference, the primary vortex (donut mantle convection) of the asteroid that fell in the Democratic Republic of Congo, Africa, was cut off by the asteroid impact in the Himalayas.
The tip of the cut donut mantle rose to become the island of Iceland.
@grindupBaker If the asteroid is about 100 kilometers in diameter, it has a core of its own.
That's why doughnut mantle convection occurs twice.
Once as the outer shell is shed, and twice as the core travels through the mantle!
The Democratic Republic of Congo asteroid impacted Earth at an inclination of about 48 degrees.
So it didn't hit the Earth's outer core!
Where did you get this from.
we know now from NASA's DART mission that asteroids are a collection of ice and loose rubble (creationists predicted this)
they also say the mid oceanic ridge was created when the water under the continents burst forth, it was created in one go, thats why it circumnavigates the earth and meets itself
what you are not considering in your statement is magma crossover depth. at a certain depth magma sinks because it compresses more than solid rock around it.
@@GhostScout42 Think about the Fiji Island tectonic vortex!
Why do huge crusts and islands swirl and rotate?! Have you thought about it?
Never explained how north American Pangea fossils are found in Tasmania