Miniés and musketry in a (French) conscript army
ฝัง
- เผยแพร่เมื่อ 3 ก.ค. 2024
- Join us on the App! weaponsandwar.tv
Following on from the presentation of France's first rifled musket, this vid focuses on the musketry training that conscripts underwent on a yearly basis. See how trigger control was trained, and also, how do you aim at targets at 400m and 600m if your only means of aiming is a fixe 200m notch?
Playeur/Utreon: playeur.com/c/blokeontherange
Patreon: / blokeontherange
Teespring: teespring.com/stores/bloke-on...
Instagram: / blokeontherange
Facebook: / blokeontherange - วิทยาศาสตร์และเทคโนโลยี
I can picture some regular instructor messing with the part timers with the finger guillotine he picked up while on leave.
"Stand fast soldier, while I calibrate your thumb." 🤣 👍 😲
😂
France, a nation on metric and with proud tradition of using science, decided it was best to use actual thumbs as a sighting system. Meanwhile, Britain, on the Imperial measurement system of arbitrary inches and feet, had adjustable sights. The 1850s were a wild time.
Ah but you generalize too much! We are talking only about the line infantry here. Chasseurs and other specialized light infantry did have adjustable sights and taught how to use them. The point is whether to try and train every soldier to use them or just focus on specialist troops. In fact Britain was the outsider and maverick at the time.
Arbitrary!? An inch is based on a thumb ironically enough!
In reality SI is arbitrary.
@@M80Ballyes and no
Was the thumb measurement not based on that of king Henry VIII ?
However, in France the King had been deposed, killed and replaced by a Republic. So don't make allusions to royalty while holding a weapon.
Great complement to the video from Paper Cartridges, on why rifles didn't really effect American Civil War battles. The mass quick conscription of American soldiers didn't allow for proper training of shooting over 200 yards (~200 m, for all practical purposes).
Yes, and I believe more likely to follow the French system. So a concentration on shorter ranges and thumb in the wind for anything over 200 meters!
@@MrChrisStarr Following any system is a bit of an ask tbh. I'm sure the few guys who had Whitworths knew what was up, but the rest of the poor bastards were learning on the job.
Thank you very much Chap for presenting and explaining this rifled musket from France.
Very interesting, especially the trigger pull training and impromptu sights.
There were indeed more things to learn than just shooting. How to polish your boots, care of equipment, bayonet charging, and without doubt the most important....marching up and down the square! Lol
Proper moustache and beard care too.
@@thebotrchap I forgot that one, dammit! Lol
Most importantly, how to tactically prepare la soupe in the section pot.
@@johnfisk811 nope, to the heads of any army (General Staff) the most important training for the infantry is Marching up and Down the Square!
@@johnfisk811 feeding yourself in the field is for the squaddies to work out for themselves! Lol
The candle trick is genius
That was an interesting demonstration with the candle Chap. Reminds me of putting s coin on the end of the muzzle and balancing it there through the trigger pull,.
Now we want to know what shooting class the Chap can achieve!
In theory I would be able to do the 100m and 200m part of the classification next year. I don't have anywhere to go out to 400 and 600m.
Is this FrenchMuzzleloaders?
Now we know what the Chap should do if he visits Canada.
Interesting video, thanks for always producing such high quality videos!
Imagine if Napoleonic France had adopted and developed Jean Samuel Pauly's breach loading tech?
You’d be speaking French 😜
Industrial revolution barely even started...
In fairness, France was a nation that had the manpower to produce large volumes of product even with pre-industrial technology. One reason the British were big on replacing men with machines was because they had far fewer men than nations like France, so they could never hope to match French production with traditional techniques.
There was nothing in a Pauly Rifle that could not be fabricated by a competent French arsenal worker and by 1809, France had a LOT of such workers, so if the will was there, Paulys and their ammunition could be made by the thousands.
A Pauly weapon would take more manhours to produce, meaning fewer weapons per given production day, but if the weapons were better enough, it would be worth it. This is why Ney and Napoleon both personally endorsed and supported Pauly's work. Napoleon was particularly good at doing the mathematics of war, and if he thought the Pauly could be cost-effective, then it probably would have been cost-effective.
Indeed, if the 1812 campaign season had not gone so bad, it is possible that the Pauly could have begun limited use as a specialist weapon by 1813 or 1814.
@@robertkalinic335
c'est trop difficille pour fabriquer@@thebotrchap
@@conradswadling8495 Avec le soutien technique des manufactures impériales le mechanism aurait pu être raffinée et simplifiée.
I can see the trigger pull practice being useful for air gun shooting 😀.
Excellent
Captain... I seem to be shooting very low at 600 meters.
You fool... who told you, you were allowed to trim your thumbnail!
Potato pealing duty for you son!
ok chap, lets see you on the range !
Visit England when you can. I'll book Century range at Bisley
Is this the manual of arms the Russian army is using at the moment ?
This is turning in to 'French Muzzle Loaders' :)
I do feel, however, that M. Le Bloke should have assumed the role of M. Le Marie-Louise under the instruction of the ever-frustrated Sergent Onion
This is my autism and I get to choose the hyper focus 😤
Excellent presentation. The French system for the guidance of conscripts and the British for the obedience of professional soldiers. BTW, ‘half cock to carry the arm loaded safely’. I thought the French army doctrine was for the soldier to carry his arm unloaded until ordered to load by his officer? Hence the absence of safety catches on French rifles. I suppose my great grandfather went through this training and refresher annually so it is interesting to have a snapshot of his experience. Merci M. le Chap.
That doctrine relates to breechloaders but in any case guards, sentries, skirmishers and such need to carry with one in the pipe ready to go. Muzzleloaders nearly always have a 1/2cock or equivalent. Strangely the Swiss didn’t bother on the 1851 carbine and 1863 rifle.
Hey Chap (or Bloke), are you guys gonna add links to the description or end card about Weapons and War?
They're there on my videos... I'll bother Chappie to do it as well.
Great video. Please, more of the same.
Monsieur le Chap. Thank you very much.(Though you need to twirl your mustaches more, to go with the cap.)
Kjell G. Vaara
Terrific presentation series, thanks Chap. I'm still struggling to comprehend the thumb aiming, when a simple series of flippy notch rear sights for different ranges could have been incorporated for not that much extra money .... especially for conscripts who benefit so much from standardisation, rather than sniper-thumb witchcraft.
As you suggest Chap, smells like artillery politics deliberately damaging infantry accuracy, so long range shooting remains the preserve of cannon.
Maddening what managers will do to preserve and promote their agendas, even if it kills people on their own side.
Besides the thumb thing (which I cannot think of any remotely practical reason for, would be easier to train and not very expensive to use some basic flip sights) it seems like a fairly reasonable and broad training for putting through large numbers of trainees quickly.
Not much cost for one individual rifle and a few man hours of training and handful of ammunition but multiply that by tens of thousands of men and rifles and it all snowballs.
@@thebotrchap I can't see how this system could possibly reduce training hours from a simple flip sight. "Flip up the appropriate sight and do the same thing as before" is a lot simpler than "hold the rifle precisely this way, aim using this method... Oh your thumb is long so you need to do this instead..."
And, yes, not having the sight would make it cheaper to produce, but the cost for a basic flip sight should be pretty minimal.
I suspect your comment into the video about it being more political than practical is accurate.
You forgot to mention that at 1000 metres you put your fist on the barrel to aim with, and for 1500 meters, you have to stick your foot up there, and aim from the top of the big toe.
And yes.... we are giggling at you silly French from over here at Hythe. Hahaha you guys are so sil.... oh crap, what's that? La Gloire? An ironclad?! Everybody panic!
I wonder if you were a first class shooter you got to stay in the back row giving a little incentive to shoot well. Why doesn't Henri advance? Oh he's a first class shooter, he's actually hitting something.