1.7 Pragmatism | Qualitative Methods | Philosophy of Qualitative Research | UvA

แชร์
ฝัง
  • เผยแพร่เมื่อ 15 ก.ย. 2024
  • In this video Dr Moerman gives you an overview of what pragmatism is and how it developed. You learn about the pragmatist maxim.

ความคิดเห็น • 14

  • @sarah2641
    @sarah2641 ปีที่แล้ว

    Dr. Moerman, this is a wonderful explanation of the pragmatic paradigm. Your statement that pragmatism is a fallibilistic view of science really helped me in solidifying my understanding of pragmatism. "Knowledge is only useful if it is practical" is an easy way to remember what is valued within pragmatism and how it relates to research and evaluation of the world around us. This video leaves me wondering the applications of pragmatism into not only research and evaluation but into everyday life and studies. Thank you, Sarah.

  • @MAPOLYompuKarlo
    @MAPOLYompuKarlo 6 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

    Best channel ever

  • @abdulahmed1161
    @abdulahmed1161 ปีที่แล้ว

    A great start

  • @Wisdombluetooth
    @Wisdombluetooth 3 ปีที่แล้ว +3

    Superbly presented :D in a very pragmatic way...yet :p

  • @Noman-pkr
    @Noman-pkr ปีที่แล้ว

    this channel helped me in learning research

  • @dimuthgamage1248
    @dimuthgamage1248 3 ปีที่แล้ว

    wonderful explanation. Thanks Professor

  • @statisticsappliedmathemati810
    @statisticsappliedmathemati810 4 ปีที่แล้ว

    Hi can we make a collab video about stat topic , im a stat instructor

  • @pjgdba306
    @pjgdba306 3 ปีที่แล้ว

    Not to overemphasize, but 2:09 "Practical!"
    However, does pragmatism turn to complete relativism - everyone with their own interpretation of "reality?"
    Self-serving models of reality?

    • @theplinkerslodge6361
      @theplinkerslodge6361 3 ปีที่แล้ว

      @@finchbevdale2069 Show me the proof. Just show me the proof. You went right to appeal to emotions on that one, so I distrust you inherently, immediately.

    • @BatEatsMoth
      @BatEatsMoth 2 ปีที่แล้ว

      No.

  • @elmolosho
    @elmolosho 2 ปีที่แล้ว

    I think in your explanation forgot that in pragmatism logic and evidence is important when you contrast ideas or theories. So your elephant example is not applicable and terrible to illustrate.

  • @danremenyi1179
    @danremenyi1179 3 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    There is a substantial misunderstading of Pragmatism here. Please take this down.

    • @CarlKho
      @CarlKho 3 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      How so? I'm new to the topic so all information's helpful.

    • @draw4everyone
      @draw4everyone 3 ปีที่แล้ว +3

      @@CarlKho Pragmatism in philosophy is a distinct theory of ideas and epistemology. It concerns not merely “looking at what is practical,” but demanding that ideas themselves have no content other than their practical consequences. This is a much stronger claim than “practical consequences are good.” The claim is “nothing other than practical consequences exist.”