We need Medicare For All/A Single Payer healthcare system here in the United States, especially during this time with the Coronavirus pandemic! What is more "Pro-Life" than ensuring that every person in America has guaranteed affordable healthcare regardless of their job or social status? Also, if we all had access to basic healthcare, we would all have the "freedom" to live long lives and rarely have to worry about medical bankruptcies. Sure, taxes will go up, but the overall cost will go down so much that everyone will be paying less and saving thousands of dollars every year. Furthermore, if some of us need additional healthcare than Medicare, then we have the "choice" to get additional insurance, but for others Medicare would be more than enough. Finally, if every other developed country (Canada, Germany, the United Kingdom, France, Italy, Sweden, Norway, Denmark, the Netherlands, Japan, South Korea, Australia, and New Zealand) can implement this system and save money, then why can't the United States do the same and help "Make America Great Again" for everybody at least on the issue of healtchare?
First of all (respectfully), I will not pay for terrible healthcare for poor people while at the same time paying for better healthcare for myself. Yes the healthcare will be terrible. Canada for example, yeah its "free" but there are upwards of 5 hours wait even if you have a broken bone, and the medical equipment is extremely cheap. In Canada you do not have access to more expensive medical machines through the public system. Secondly, I think any public system is vulnerable to illegal immigrants to get healthcare they don't pay taxes for, putting an even greater strain on the citizens who do. Also (respectfully) I'd like to see your source that says we can save money and not diminish the quality of our healthcare with a "healthcare for all" system. I will propose a solution to the healthcare problem. Why don't we force healthcare providers into a competitive fight for customers, instead of giving them Grant's and subsidies. Prices would go down. Solved.
@@larsbrown9322 Yeah. Unfortunately, people fail to realize that Capitalism (not Corporatism) IS the answer to most of our problems, especially "classist" problems. Competition forces things to become cheaper, especially in ubiquity of an item or service. And the trickle-down effect is that even people that may be in the poor bracket can afford things they could have only dreamed of 50 years ago. Why do you think a poor person still has a phone and air conditioning, probably a car and clothing and food these days?
@@larsbrown9322 Another confirmation follow-up, I think it's Sweden or Norway, that even though they have public Healthcare, still 30% of people have private healthcare to cover exactly what you are talking about: the better, pricier things that public CAN'T afford to provide.
Lily did an amazing job at how meaningful AI can be used for effective healthcare. Technology has been advancing rapidly and we are seeing how that can be used to help alleviate the doctor’s workload. Seeing that AI can be used to help find diseases like she mentioned with diabetic retinopathy is amazing. This allows for more accessible healthcare for patients that can’t afford it or have a harder time accessing it. Not only that, it allows doctors to provide more efficient healthcare that can help doctors from burn out. Also using AI for diagnostic like cancer can help more patients and reduce cancer scares as Lily mentioned. One thing that does concern me is the question or topic of AI perhaps replacing actual physicians in the field. Physicians can provide that empathy that I don’t believe AI can provide. That element of empathy and care is a huge factor in the relationship between patient and physician. That part can help establish quality healthcare because patients are able to trust their doctors and somewhat find a haven when it comes to their health. Overall, as a medical student it is really exciting to see where AI is going to take us in the future of healthcare. There are several ways that AI can help provide quality healthcare and Lily was able to illustrate some of those.
This was a very impressive discussion about the use of Artificial Intelligence (AI) in a clinical setting. I admire the fact that the speaker struggled with the issue of accessible healthcare for many years and as a physician has taken action to do something about it. I strongly agree that there is a place for AI in the medical sphere and believe that this is a phenomenal example of a situation where AI presents a straightforward solution. The issue of access to healthcare in medicine is one of the most pressing topics in the modern age of medicine. Lack of access to healthcare and especially access to specialists, disproportionately affects lower socioeconomic groups and minorities. This violates one of the core principles that medical ethics seeks to uphold, and that is the idea of justice. Clearly people who can not receive routine medical care due to financial concerns, lack of resources, or the multitude of other valid reasons that people are unable to access care, leaves people unfairly disadvantaged. This issue is likely not going to get better with the current medical training and expected numbers related to the next generation of up and coming medical providers. I think the speaker very clearly understood this. She chose a disease that is highly manageable, is fairly prevalent due to the high incidence of diabetes mellitus, and often requires some degree of consultations with a specialist. AI is essentially a perfect complementary solution for managing this one aspect of the diagnosis. I also think that this was an interesting choice of application because in some ways it circumvents some of the issues of privacy and discrimination that often accompany using AI in a healthcare setting. In this situation, a retina picture is fairly de-identified and essentially void of possibility for discrimination. I believe that applications like this in the early stages of AI may build patient confidence in the utility of this technology and foster trust with the medical community as it works to solve the issue of inaccessible healthcare. I hope that for patients without access to care that seeing this may allow them to feel hope and potentially a sense of empowerment knowing that medical providers and a multidisciplinary team are working diligently on solutions to expand medical care.
Yes this is meant to dupe impressionable people into buying a for-profit product. Not for our profit, for monopolies and corporations that won't behave ethically.
@@larsbrown9322 : The problem is capitalism without democracy, it's most important component. The world has as of yet never seen a democracy in any country except perhaps one, maybe. Certainly democracy in the U.S. has never been anything more than a bold faced lie.
Fantastic explanation regarding the meaningful use of artificial intelligence (AI) in the pursuit of equitable and effective healthcare! I appreciate Dr. Lily Peng’s impassioned discussion with respect to implementing AI into medicine to challenge the longstanding inequities and neglect that have persisted for years, especially towards underserved communities. While I’m inspired by the use of AI technology in medicine, I would be remiss not to mention the ethical concerns that must be completely assessed and investigated before full clinical utilization is realized. First, informed consent is a crucially important ethical consideration when conceptualizing how to integrate AI into patient care. As the foundational starting point to any medical intervention, obtaining informed consent requires that the patient is sufficiently educated and advised to fully understand the evaluation, treatment, or procedure they are agreeing to. On a practical level, complete transparency and effective communication are prerequisites for establishing informed consent. Therefore, incorporation of AI into clinical and hospital settings would necessitate clear and reliable explanation to all patients precisely the purpose, function, and decision-making behind AI. Ensuring that patients understand how AI operates and its role in their individualized medical care is imperative. This is of particular importance when considering the use of AI to improve healthcare in medically underserved communities, as these populations are vulnerable to unethical practices and exploitation as evidenced in the history of medicine. With this understanding and the ethical principle of beneficence in mind, we must uphold informed consent amidst the enthusiasm behind AI and its potential to revolutionize how we deliver high quality medicine in an equitable manner. Another critical ethical concern pertains to patient privacy. Given how AI in medicine sources an expansive set of data from patients to self-optimize, we must evaluate how to ensure that patient health records are maintained private and uncompromised. With the introduction of AI into clinical practice, it’s incumbent on us all to hold this software to the same standard that every medical professional is liable to and responsible for regarding patient health information. Considering this, it’s vital to postulate and rigorously evaluate how trustworthy AI can be in handling millions of patient’s health records. Lastly, and perhaps one of the most consequential obstacles for utilizing artificial intelligence in medicine, is the inability to replicate or replace human empathy. The humanistic element and invaluable physician-patient relationship are foundational components in medicine, which often are instrumental in the healing process and management of dying patients. An article by Carlos Montemayor in AI & Society argues that “AI cannot provide consciously empathetic attention, because empathy is based on our biological conscious and unconscious mental experiences and our attention capacities to select the most salient and important information for a patient in a situation of care. And this selection is rooted in biologic experiences like resonating with another’s emotions.” Ultimately, I wholeheartedly believe the use of AI in medicine must be collaborative in all forms to preserve empathetic and humanistic patient care while benefiting from the technologic advancements inherent to AI.
This was a fantastic talk highlighting some of the main concerns of modern healthcare. As a medical student currently, I have noticed similar fears that there are not enough physicians to help all those who need it. This concerns me both for the physicians, who have incredibly high rates of suicide and burnout, and for the patients, who need medical attention and cannot receive it. I applaud you for taking so many meaningful steps to limiting the inequities that are currently and historically faced within our healthcare system. I would be remiss to not also bring up some of the medical ethics regarding the use of AI in healthcare that were not discussed here. I am sure that many of these have been previously considered since you have been working on this project for so long, but informed consent for the patient is vital. Both for the patient that is seeking medical advice as well as the photos of those patients that are being compared via the AI system. I believe our technology is advancing in such drastic ways that our ethical and political systems cannot keep up. The use of such technology requires politicians, physicians, engineers to constantly be working together to always keep the safety and privacy of our patients the top priority. Ultimately, the use of AI technology to bring healthcare to those who desperately need it will undoubtedly save many lives. I only implore that we must continue to protect our patients as we advance the field of medicine.
You are truly a humanitarian!! Thank you for your great work!!...I only wish the world would acknowledge and help!!..please keep up your great work!!😊😊😊😊❤❤
The cost of sequencing will drop to near zero so we can sequence everyone. This means we would be aware of the diseases that everyone are genetically predisposed for and could administer preventative treatment. Medicine will need many more powerful computers to process all this information.
Absolutely. The reason preventative medicine isn't being addressed though is because the wealthy elite are able to steal more of our hard earned money by "treating" diseases than they ever could by preventing them. This myopic and selfish mindset of theirs though is driving down our economies because by preventing disease that money could be put into education and making the planet a safer and less toxic environment in so many ways.
@@aylbdrmadison1051 I think a universal basic income would solve a lot of problems, and as automation increases peoples income increases. Everyone on the planet will soon have access to fast broadband from the Starlink constellation, whom will be launching another sixty satellites in about an hours time. We are moving forward at an exponential rate but our politicians seem to be stuck in the past.
I stopped at 1:26, to make a comment. The Rockefeller family was instrumental in setting up many govt programs at the early 1900s. One of which was the system how medical institutions operate today. The Carnegie family was instrumental along with the Rockefeller family in setting up the educational system, by which, still functioning today. Everyone including this woman, is a result of that system. Think about that 🤔👍
But then again, theres nothing wrong going against companies that built the foundation of America. They can turn corrupt at anytime in history, and as a matter of fact the Rockefeller company did aid in many horrendous attrocities throughout most of the 20th century.
@@shiverarts8284 she never mentioned. I sought knowledge and searched the internet. That's what the internet was first intented. But just like anything, greed takes over 😂
Thanks for your hard work and I have a lot of plans in the future I need to develop my knowledge in everything I love to learn everything in all ways I hope I can create the best effect that can change the world to better place to live and I will I will but I have to be patient
I do not trust AI or algorithms to treat or diagnose me. Algorithms are extremely vulnerable to small tweaks by their creator for malicious purposes. YT algorithms for are taking extreme heat for unfair promoting of certain content. My main concern is that you would have to trust the algorithms creator to have no special interests. For example, promoting a certain medication that a pharma co gives money to the algorithms creator to promote. You just never know....
This is why capitalism is broken as a system of governing. Especially considering there is *no democracy* in any but possibly one country in the entire world. And that country is obviously *not* the U.S.
@@aylbdrmadison1051 if you want a full democracy you are insane. A full democracy is a terrible thing. Tyranny by the easily manipulated masses. If you think that the media of today can easily influence people's opinions then why advocate for a system that is based solely on those fickle opinions.
@@aylbdrmadison1051 capitalism is not the root of America's problems, the increased social programs are partly to blame. The US in 1800s had few economic problems save for workers protection, and a few others.
@Greg Jacques Lucifer's Jizz Gargler ...........so the entire history of every nation that incorporated capitalism was a ponzi scheme....even ancient babylonia? Capitalism is the basic idea that you can profit from your own work. It is inherent in our minds as humans. Even apes can trade food. Calling it a ponzi scheme shows you know nothing about the subject. Can you provide an example of a better system...I'll wait.
@Greg Jacques Lucifer's Jizz Gargler your claim that "capitalism is the reapeated failure of said idea" ...so nobody has ever profited of their own labour..??? Lmao use all the big words you want, your argument still shows you have the same amount of brains as a rock
The real problem is we had a far far better education system before the reagan era when the conservatives began aggressively dismantling it in an effort to turn it into nothing more than a worker drone factory and a profit machine for the already wealthy elite.
@@aylbdrmadison1051 we're both correct Regan or 120 yrs ago. It's pretty much over. My only point was tech has progressed too rapidly for the social order to absorb. Where it leads from here, I'll let you educate the masses
She doesn't pin down what "Democratizing healthcare with AI"' means. In this she wants healthcare more like corporations. The most powerful and dominant in these advanced fields would get bigger and further removed from its consumers (us). Its also a model prone to corruption and other subversive practices (Big Oil, Cell phone companies, internet service providers). We'll just get price-gouged on every product due to monopolies.
If you look at the word "democratize" it also means to make something accessible to everyone. It doesn't just have to do with politics. I didn't know that until just now. You know how I found out? Googled "define democratize" LOL Her presentation had nothing to do with socializing things, or politics, or single-payer healthcare. It's about making AI do the job that people don't have the time to do, therefore giving more people a chance at getting diagnosed.
Definitely could have put a more informative title about what the talk entailed lol. I definitely finished the video with even more eye opening information than i first expected when i first saw this vid in my sub feed
Schizophrenia, bipolar, severe depression, autism, and ADHD all have a genetic cause and they all are connected so there are only a few genes responsible which could be targeted with gene editing technologies like CRISPR.
Using a search engine to find answers to such questions is far easier than wasting ones own time by asking such a question in youtube comments, when that will so obviously get you replies *mostly from those who are uneducated* in the matter. If you are serious about finding a *real* answer, enter a couple of words into a search engine and get your answer faster, easier and far more likely a correct answer too. That said, I think the people who ask such things on youtube almost never actually want an answer, but are trying to persuade others to fall into the same *conspiracy hypothesis trap* they are in. I understand being in such a trap can be lonely, but pulling others down into a trap with them does nothing to help raise them out of it. All that does is create a situation where there are less people who can actually help them climb out.
Missing the point she is talking about putting out health care fires instead of preventing them to begin with. This is where health care fails world wide focusing on after the fact . I’m not saying she isn’t doing a amazing job but she is not focusing on the root cause prevention of diabetes to begin with
Your video editing is very distracting and unnecessary. You make me focus on it not the content. That's bad. I leave the presentation with the sense that a bunch of kids got a bunch of new cameras and an editing console, and left a bunch of school kids fighting over a mixing board. TEDx does better than this. Please do.
It's a talk, not a movie. So personally I'd rather they put most of their efforts into researching the subject matter, rather than waste time on fancy editing.
This is the right direction.
We need Medicare For All/A Single Payer healthcare system here in the United States, especially during this time with the Coronavirus pandemic! What is more "Pro-Life" than ensuring that every person in America has guaranteed affordable healthcare regardless of their job or social status? Also, if we all had access to basic healthcare, we would all have the "freedom" to live long lives and rarely have to worry about medical bankruptcies. Sure, taxes will go up, but the overall cost will go down so much that everyone will be paying less and saving thousands of dollars every year. Furthermore, if some of us need additional healthcare than Medicare, then we have the "choice" to get additional insurance, but for others Medicare would be more than enough. Finally, if every other developed country (Canada, Germany, the United Kingdom, France, Italy, Sweden, Norway, Denmark, the Netherlands, Japan, South Korea, Australia, and New Zealand) can implement this system and save money, then why can't the United States do the same and help "Make America Great Again" for everybody at least on the issue of healtchare?
First of all (respectfully), I will not pay for terrible healthcare for poor people while at the same time paying for better healthcare for myself. Yes the healthcare will be terrible. Canada for example, yeah its "free" but there are upwards of 5 hours wait even if you have a broken bone, and the medical equipment is extremely cheap. In Canada you do not have access to more expensive medical machines through the public system.
Secondly, I think any public system is vulnerable to illegal immigrants to get healthcare they don't pay taxes for, putting an even greater strain on the citizens who do.
Also (respectfully) I'd like to see your source that says we can save money and not diminish the quality of our healthcare with a "healthcare for all" system.
I will propose a solution to the healthcare problem.
Why don't we force healthcare providers into a competitive fight for customers, instead of giving them Grant's and subsidies. Prices would go down. Solved.
@@larsbrown9322 Yeah. Unfortunately, people fail to realize that Capitalism (not Corporatism) IS the answer to most of our problems, especially "classist" problems. Competition forces things to become cheaper, especially in ubiquity of an item or service. And the trickle-down effect is that even people that may be in the poor bracket can afford things they could have only dreamed of 50 years ago. Why do you think a poor person still has a phone and air conditioning, probably a car and clothing and food these days?
@@larsbrown9322 Another confirmation follow-up, I think it's Sweden or Norway, that even though they have public Healthcare, still 30% of people have private healthcare to cover exactly what you are talking about: the better, pricier things that public CAN'T afford to provide.
Lily!! You did a great job and I am very proud of you!!
If animals can speak n understand what human being can do then they will be the most beautiful peace maker.
Animals generally have more common sense than humans do.
This is the most beautiful thing I have ever read this day
If animals can communicate with us, it means they're sentient and we're responsible for the genocide of trillions. I really hope this never happens
@@dylangergutierrez Already happened
Can you add her title if she’s an MD , she worked hard for it... interesting talk thanks
Lily did an amazing job at how meaningful AI can be used for effective healthcare. Technology has been advancing rapidly and we are seeing how that can be used to help alleviate the doctor’s workload. Seeing that AI can be used to help find diseases like she mentioned with diabetic retinopathy is amazing. This allows for more accessible healthcare for patients that can’t afford it or have a harder time accessing it. Not only that, it allows doctors to provide more efficient healthcare that can help doctors from burn out. Also using AI for diagnostic like cancer can help more patients and reduce cancer scares as Lily mentioned. One thing that does concern me is the question or topic of AI perhaps replacing actual physicians in the field. Physicians can provide that empathy that I don’t believe AI can provide. That element of empathy and care is a huge factor in the relationship between patient and physician. That part can help establish quality healthcare because patients are able to trust their doctors and somewhat find a haven when it comes to their health. Overall, as a medical student it is really exciting to see where AI is going to take us in the future of healthcare. There are several ways that AI can help provide quality healthcare and Lily was able to illustrate some of those.
I love her speech! She's incredibly good!
This was a very impressive discussion about the use of Artificial Intelligence (AI) in a clinical setting. I admire the fact that the speaker struggled with the issue of accessible healthcare for many years and as a physician has taken action to do something about it. I strongly agree that there is a place for AI in the medical sphere and believe that this is a phenomenal example of a situation where AI presents a straightforward solution.
The issue of access to healthcare in medicine is one of the most pressing topics in the modern age of medicine. Lack of access to healthcare and especially access to specialists, disproportionately affects lower socioeconomic groups and minorities. This violates one of the core principles that medical ethics seeks to uphold, and that is the idea of justice. Clearly people who can not receive routine medical care due to financial concerns, lack of resources, or the multitude of other valid reasons that people are unable to access care, leaves people unfairly disadvantaged. This issue is likely not going to get better with the current medical training and expected numbers related to the next generation of up and coming medical providers. I think the speaker very clearly understood this. She chose a disease that is highly manageable, is fairly prevalent due to the high incidence of diabetes mellitus, and often requires some degree of consultations with a specialist. AI is essentially a perfect complementary solution for managing this one aspect of the diagnosis. I also think that this was an interesting choice of application because in some ways it circumvents some of the issues of privacy and discrimination that often accompany using AI in a healthcare setting. In this situation, a retina picture is fairly de-identified and essentially void of possibility for discrimination. I believe that applications like this in the early stages of AI may build patient confidence in the utility of this technology and foster trust with the medical community as it works to solve the issue of inaccessible healthcare. I hope that for patients without access to care that seeing this may allow them to feel hope and potentially a sense of empowerment knowing that medical providers and a multidisciplinary team are working diligently on solutions to expand medical care.
She is very well spoken
@Greg Jacques Lucifer's Jizz Gargler I mean I didn't hear any ums or weird pauses like I would do
@Greg Jacques Lucifer's Jizz Gargler most people I know have all these pauses when public speaking
That's right.
Truth to be told , nothing in this world has been or never will be for poor people .... not thing at all ...
Yes this is meant to dupe impressionable people into buying a for-profit product. Not for our profit, for monopolies and corporations that won't behave ethically.
that's what capitalists want people to think.
@@MrKroxan under socialism and communism everyone is poor, under capitalism, the incompetent are poor.
Pick one.
@@larsbrown9322 : The problem is capitalism without democracy, it's most important component. The world has as of yet never seen a democracy in any country except perhaps one, maybe. Certainly democracy in the U.S. has never been anything more than a bold faced lie.
@@aylbdrmadison1051 what is your "except perhaps one maybe" country?
Fantastic explanation regarding the meaningful use of artificial intelligence (AI) in the pursuit of equitable and effective healthcare! I appreciate Dr. Lily Peng’s impassioned discussion with respect to implementing AI into medicine to challenge the longstanding inequities and neglect that have persisted for years, especially towards underserved communities. While I’m inspired by the use of AI technology in medicine, I would be remiss not to mention the ethical concerns that must be completely assessed and investigated before full clinical utilization is realized. First, informed consent is a crucially important ethical consideration when conceptualizing how to integrate AI into patient care. As the foundational starting point to any medical intervention, obtaining informed consent requires that the patient is sufficiently educated and advised to fully understand the evaluation, treatment, or procedure they are agreeing to. On a practical level, complete transparency and effective communication are prerequisites for establishing informed consent. Therefore, incorporation of AI into clinical and hospital settings would necessitate clear and reliable explanation to all patients precisely the purpose, function, and decision-making behind AI. Ensuring that patients understand how AI operates and its role in their individualized medical care is imperative. This is of particular importance when considering the use of AI to improve healthcare in medically underserved communities, as these populations are vulnerable to unethical practices and exploitation as evidenced in the history of medicine. With this understanding and the ethical principle of beneficence in mind, we must uphold informed consent amidst the enthusiasm behind AI and its potential to revolutionize how we deliver high quality medicine in an equitable manner. Another critical ethical concern pertains to patient privacy. Given how AI in medicine sources an expansive set of data from patients to self-optimize, we must evaluate how to ensure that patient health records are maintained private and uncompromised. With the introduction of AI into clinical practice, it’s incumbent on us all to hold this software to the same standard that every medical professional is liable to and responsible for regarding patient health information. Considering this, it’s vital to postulate and rigorously evaluate how trustworthy AI can be in handling millions of patient’s health records. Lastly, and perhaps one of the most consequential obstacles for utilizing artificial intelligence in medicine, is the inability to replicate or replace human empathy. The humanistic element and invaluable physician-patient relationship are foundational components in medicine, which often are instrumental in the healing process and management of dying patients. An article by Carlos Montemayor in AI & Society argues that “AI cannot provide consciously empathetic attention, because empathy is based on our biological conscious and unconscious mental experiences and our attention capacities to select the most salient and important information for a patient in a situation of care. And this selection is rooted in biologic experiences like resonating with another’s emotions.” Ultimately, I wholeheartedly believe the use of AI in medicine must be collaborative in all forms to preserve empathetic and humanistic patient care while benefiting from the technologic advancements inherent to AI.
This was a fantastic talk highlighting some of the main concerns of modern healthcare. As a medical student currently, I have noticed similar fears that there are not enough physicians to help all those who need it. This concerns me both for the physicians, who have incredibly high rates of suicide and burnout, and for the patients, who need medical attention and cannot receive it. I applaud you for taking so many meaningful steps to limiting the inequities that are currently and historically faced within our healthcare system.
I would be remiss to not also bring up some of the medical ethics regarding the use of AI in healthcare that were not discussed here. I am sure that many of these have been previously considered since you have been working on this project for so long, but informed consent for the patient is vital. Both for the patient that is seeking medical advice as well as the photos of those patients that are being compared via the AI system. I believe our technology is advancing in such drastic ways that our ethical and political systems cannot keep up. The use of such technology requires politicians, physicians, engineers to constantly be working together to always keep the safety and privacy of our patients the top priority.
Ultimately, the use of AI technology to bring healthcare to those who desperately need it will undoubtedly save many lives. I only implore that we must continue to protect our patients as we advance the field of medicine.
Wow, eye opening!
Really? Why?
@@blackjackjack5612: Still trying to pull others down into the same conspiracy hypothesis trap you're in?
(See my reply to your own comment.)
People like you will definitely make this world a better place 👏
GO LILY!!!! You are a star! :)
Amazing speech!
Amazing speech 🙏🙏🙏🙏
Love it! Such a great idea! AI can help with so many things it's incredible.
You are truly a humanitarian!! Thank you for your great work!!...I only wish the world would acknowledge and help!!..please keep up your great work!!😊😊😊😊❤❤
The cost of sequencing will drop to near zero so we can sequence everyone. This means we would be aware of the diseases that everyone are genetically predisposed for and could administer preventative treatment. Medicine will need many more powerful computers to process all this information.
Absolutely. The reason preventative medicine isn't being addressed though is because the wealthy elite are able to steal more of our hard earned money by "treating" diseases than they ever could by preventing them. This myopic and selfish mindset of theirs though is driving down our economies because by preventing disease that money could be put into education and making the planet a safer and less toxic environment in so many ways.
@@aylbdrmadison1051 I think a universal basic income would solve a lot of problems, and as automation increases peoples income increases. Everyone on the planet will soon have access to fast broadband from the Starlink constellation, whom will be launching another sixty satellites in about an hours time. We are moving forward at an exponential rate but our politicians seem to be stuck in the past.
Lily Peng is not bad at all!
I stopped at 1:26, to make a comment. The Rockefeller family was instrumental in setting up many govt programs at the early 1900s. One of which was the system how medical institutions operate today. The Carnegie family was instrumental along with the Rockefeller family in setting up the educational system, by which, still functioning today.
Everyone including this woman, is a result of that system. Think about that 🤔👍
When did she mention the Rockefeller corporation?
@Blackjack Jack : If that is so, then *you* are also a result of that system. Think about that smart guy.
But then again, theres nothing wrong going against companies that built the foundation of America. They can turn corrupt at anytime in history, and as a matter of fact the Rockefeller company did aid in many horrendous attrocities throughout most of the 20th century.
@@shiverarts8284 she never mentioned. I sought knowledge and searched the internet. That's what the internet was first intented. But just like anything, greed takes over 😂
@@aylbdrmadison1051 I never was that smart but thanks for the compliment. I just learned not to believe everything only the parts.
Thanks for your hard work and I have a lot of plans in the future I need to develop my knowledge in everything I love to learn everything in all ways I hope I can create the best effect that can change the world to better place to live and I will I will but I have to be patient
awesome, this idea is mind blowing
This is freakin amazing.
I do not trust AI or algorithms to treat or diagnose me. Algorithms are extremely vulnerable to small tweaks by their creator for malicious purposes. YT algorithms for are taking extreme heat for unfair promoting of certain content.
My main concern is that you would have to trust the algorithms creator to have no special interests. For example, promoting a certain medication that a pharma co gives money to the algorithms creator to promote. You just never know....
This is why capitalism is broken as a system of governing. Especially considering there is *no democracy* in any but possibly one country in the entire world. And that country is obviously *not* the U.S.
@@aylbdrmadison1051 if you want a full democracy you are insane. A full democracy is a terrible thing. Tyranny by the easily manipulated masses. If you think that the media of today can easily influence people's opinions then why advocate for a system that is based solely on those fickle opinions.
@@aylbdrmadison1051 capitalism is not the root of America's problems, the increased social programs are partly to blame. The US in 1800s had few economic problems save for workers protection, and a few others.
@Greg Jacques Lucifer's Jizz Gargler ...........so the entire history of every nation that incorporated capitalism was a ponzi scheme....even ancient babylonia? Capitalism is the basic idea that you can profit from your own work. It is inherent in our minds as humans. Even apes can trade food. Calling it a ponzi scheme shows you know nothing about the subject. Can you provide an example of a better system...I'll wait.
@Greg Jacques Lucifer's Jizz Gargler your claim that "capitalism is the reapeated failure of said idea"
...so nobody has ever profited of their own labour..??? Lmao use all the big words you want, your argument still shows you have the same amount of brains as a rock
Stopped again at 1:65. Goggle may not be the best answer
Interesting speech i saw it.
You were there?
@@Sheepish-Shepherd maybe
2:28 technology has advanced so much in the last 20 years, the educational system that's now over a 100 years old can't keep up
The real problem is we had a far far better education system before the reagan era when the conservatives began aggressively dismantling it in an effort to turn it into nothing more than a worker drone factory and a profit machine for the already wealthy elite.
@@aylbdrmadison1051 we're both correct Regan or 120 yrs ago. It's pretty much over. My only point was tech has progressed too rapidly for the social order to absorb. Where it leads from here, I'll let you educate the masses
She doesn't pin down what "Democratizing healthcare with AI"' means. In this she wants healthcare more like corporations. The most powerful and dominant in these advanced fields would get bigger and further removed from its consumers (us). Its also a model prone to corruption and other subversive practices (Big Oil, Cell phone companies, internet service providers). We'll just get price-gouged on every product due to monopolies.
Healthcare is already more like corporation on higher level. She is on point with the title.
@@merrilalmeida5982 sad but very true.
If you look at the word "democratize" it also means to make something accessible to everyone. It doesn't just have to do with politics.
I didn't know that until just now. You know how I found out? Googled "define democratize"
LOL
Her presentation had nothing to do with socializing things, or politics, or single-payer healthcare.
It's about making AI do the job that people don't have the time to do, therefore giving more people a chance at getting diagnosed.
you speak english very good
ARE WE IN THE FUTURE
Definitely could have put a more informative title about what the talk entailed lol. I definitely finished the video with even more eye opening information than i first expected when i first saw this vid in my sub feed
Or rather, a more precise title
i like it
AI for detection and management of mental health is the next big thing!!!
Schizophrenia, bipolar, severe depression, autism, and ADHD all have a genetic cause and they all are connected so there are only a few genes responsible which could be targeted with gene editing technologies like CRISPR.
Wow she does look like a human, man these new AI's are the future.
What does TEDx mean?
Using a search engine would find you an answer much faster and it would be far more likely to be a correct answer too.
Technology, Entertainment, Design.
The X indicates a crossover with whatever company/uni/anything else.
It came from a man called "Ted the exterminator" He was a crazy guy!! But he was also a brilliant scientists
.. Dis is fact !
Great
was this reuploaded?
Computer was created to solve problem but organization made it complicated
Stopped at 2 37, Cancer. What is cancer, is it some thing that a doctor said or TV berated everyone into compliance. So how do you know?
Using a search engine to find answers to such questions is far easier than wasting ones own time by asking such a question in youtube comments, when that will so obviously get you replies *mostly from those who are uneducated* in the matter. If you are serious about finding a *real* answer, enter a couple of words into a search engine and get your answer faster, easier and far more likely a correct answer too.
That said, I think the people who ask such things on youtube almost never actually want an answer, but are trying to persuade others to fall into the same *conspiracy hypothesis trap* they are in. I understand being in such a trap can be lonely, but pulling others down into a trap with them does nothing to help raise them out of it. All that does is create a situation where there are less people who can actually help them climb out.
@@aylbdrmadison1051 thanks for trying to put me in a box, next.
Please don't misunderstand, I'm all for education, when it actually helps the masses
😍
Democratizing will be insulting if it goes on toward photonics and Qdot nano error.. biomark is not a party anyone wants
Nice
'Mir 😙🇨🇷🇵🇷🇵🇸.
Missing the point she is talking about putting out health care fires instead of preventing them to begin with. This is where health care fails world wide focusing on after the fact . I’m not saying she isn’t doing a amazing job but she is not focusing on the root cause prevention of diabetes to begin with
The kids
Não entendi nada kkk
Wow enserio
Não sei falar Inglês kkk
Take it out of the lobbyist very hands and get the politicians platform s
SAVE MILLIONS OF LIVES
👍🏻🤣
Second
First
Nobody cares
Your video editing is very distracting and unnecessary. You make me focus on it not the content. That's bad. I leave the presentation with the sense that a bunch of kids got a bunch of new cameras and an editing console, and left a bunch of school kids fighting over a mixing board. TEDx does better than this. Please do.
It's a talk, not a movie. So personally I'd rather they put most of their efforts into researching the subject matter, rather than waste time on fancy editing.
China girl talk about poor Indian people ۔
Her talk was not relevant to *only* one race or country. Please pay attention.
i think she is from taiwan
no other dress to wear? like more professional looking? 🙄