Building design by SAP2000 Software

แชร์
ฝัง
  • เผยแพร่เมื่อ 13 พ.ย. 2019
  • In this Video lecture you are able to learn about Building design by SAP 2000 Software.
    -----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
    In this channel you can learn about online civil engineering softwares. So Please subscribe my channel for more intresting videos.
    -----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
    To subscribe my channel click on Red Button and also press the Bell icon.
    ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

ความคิดเห็น • 54

  • @awwalabdulnasir5478
    @awwalabdulnasir5478 4 ปีที่แล้ว +6

    It was straight to the point thank you so much

  • @vijayakumarvijayakumar8
    @vijayakumarvijayakumar8 4 ปีที่แล้ว +2

    Explanation was simple and i can understand sir.. Very nice

  • @vamshikumar6754
    @vamshikumar6754 4 ปีที่แล้ว +3

    thank you bro, explanation was simple and clear

  • @engrvarsi3774
    @engrvarsi3774 4 ปีที่แล้ว +3

    Why did you add dead load in Y Direction? Isn't it Z direction in CSI software package?

  • @constrocivil
    @constrocivil ปีที่แล้ว +2

    Software doesn't calculate self weight as we give self wt multiplier is 1.???

  • @lucadq2353
    @lucadq2353 4 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    Thank you 😊 .. can you please explain how to simulate a lift plan on sap2000? I want to simulate lifting a structure using a crane and I want to calculate the deflection (on structure) resulting from this lift.. thank you in advance

  • @MuhammadFahad-xr4hs
    @MuhammadFahad-xr4hs 2 ปีที่แล้ว +2

    Good job. But I have a query regarding self weight as in beam case you have applied point load similarly in column you applied UDL load but actually it is vice versa...

  • @abrananth
    @abrananth 4 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    Bro, SAP have a issue that for Bending moment values taken from Center to center of frames, whereas in Etabs are if u put Auto in end offset it will deduct beam depth for column end offset automatically.
    Because of this problem concrete design have huge variation between etabs and SAP.
    Do u have solution? How to assign end offset same like etabs in SAP?

  • @shobhitmishra6199
    @shobhitmishra6199 2 ปีที่แล้ว

    Very good video. 👍🏻

  • @palsambharath3475
    @palsambharath3475 4 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    Superb explanation brother

  • @hcStructuralDesigns
    @hcStructuralDesigns 4 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    Sir can you model solid cylinder in SAP2000???

  • @nitkurukshetra.civil101
    @nitkurukshetra.civil101 2 ปีที่แล้ว

    Sir can be make a composite column such as cfst column using sap2000

  • @payaljain4882
    @payaljain4882 3 ปีที่แล้ว

    Sir....design of building with raft foundation and analyze with soil structure interaction effect....please. is design ka video upload kr skte ho??

  • @filizkaya9600
    @filizkaya9600 2 ปีที่แล้ว

    Very nice

  • @Mrityunjoy5
    @Mrityunjoy5 4 ปีที่แล้ว

    sir we want more videos on sap 2000

  • @mohamedanas1152
    @mohamedanas1152 3 ปีที่แล้ว

    Can you model diagrid steel structure using sap 2000?pls

  • @eramit2124
    @eramit2124 3 ปีที่แล้ว

    Bro it was a good tutorial... btw i have a doubt... the selfwt of the structure is automatically calculated by the software itself na... then why we are assigning separately?

    • @MG-ny1ue
      @MG-ny1ue 2 ปีที่แล้ว

      There is no need to assign the self weight of structure. Csi software's assigns automatically in both etabs as well as in sap 2000.

    • @gulfjobs91
      @gulfjobs91 10 หลายเดือนก่อน

      Yeah. No need to assign self weight of the structure.

  • @nt9425
    @nt9425 4 ปีที่แล้ว +3

    Nice tutorial, pls can you extract details from Sap2000?

    • @civilengineeringbyshravan9596
      @civilengineeringbyshravan9596  4 ปีที่แล้ว

      I will try definitely in my upcoming videos 👍🏻

    • @nt9425
      @nt9425 4 ปีที่แล้ว

      @@civilengineeringbyshravan9596 will be looking forward to that
      Thanks

  • @jrimman
    @jrimman 3 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    And why are you calculating the dead load ? You have already defined the Dead Load in the Load patterns right?

    • @Structural_analysis
      @Structural_analysis 2 ปีที่แล้ว +2

      Of course.. you are correct 100%..
      Dont need to calculate and assign them

  • @sushantchavan1362
    @sushantchavan1362 2 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    Sir plz make video on analysis of bridge in SAP 2000 🙏🙏🙏🙏

  • @aamirsaifi3008
    @aamirsaifi3008 4 ปีที่แล้ว +2

    Brother which institute is better to learn SAP 2000 in Delhi?

  • @fern8704
    @fern8704 4 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

    Hi, i have a question, I'm new to sap2000 (please don't judge me) How did you made the model/structure shake? (in 14:11). answer my curious mind please, I'm finding most of the tutorials but I couldn't find any 😭

  • @usmanafzal8952
    @usmanafzal8952 2 ปีที่แล้ว

    can someone help for column design ?

  • @andryfauzan6740
    @andryfauzan6740 2 ปีที่แล้ว

    where did u get 25?

  • @samimirzaa2899
    @samimirzaa2899 4 ปีที่แล้ว

    I CAN NOT PS BUTTON

  • @girishdeshmukh5308
    @girishdeshmukh5308 2 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    You assigned dead loads in wrong way. SAP calculates Dead load on its own. also you assigned in Global Y direction as its a gravity load must be given in glbal Z direction as per SAP2000.

  • @structuraldrawingsforfresh9437
    @structuraldrawingsforfresh9437 3 ปีที่แล้ว

    Respectively respectively 300 times Hindi me v video banao yar

    • @Hypocrite420
      @Hypocrite420 2 ปีที่แล้ว

      hindi choro bhai kuch nhi rakha

  • @SONGS_FOR_EVER
    @SONGS_FOR_EVER 4 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    WHY ASSIGNED THE DEAD LOAD?

    • @civilengineeringbyshravan9596
      @civilengineeringbyshravan9596  4 ปีที่แล้ว

      In sap software we need to apply loads separately for dead load for all members

    • @SONGS_FOR_EVER
      @SONGS_FOR_EVER 4 ปีที่แล้ว +3

      @@civilengineeringbyshravan9596 that's not correct, I saw many videos they didn't assigned the dead load ( own self- weight), this is automatic process in all csi softwares.

    • @JuanPablo-tm6yi
      @JuanPablo-tm6yi 4 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      @@civilengineeringbyshravan9596 This is economically incorrect. In Load Patterns, you have the selfweight multiplier to 1, thus adding another dead load physically to the structure will double your deadload.

  • @jrimman
    @jrimman 3 ปีที่แล้ว

    why is concrete slab designed as "membrane" shouldn't it be designed as a "shell-thin"?? Since the concrete solid slab has considerable flexural stiffness hence it should be designed as a shell NOT A MEMBRANE.

    • @Structural_analysis
      @Structural_analysis 2 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      It is more conservative.. because then the moments will be absorbed by the frames.. so you design beams for a slightly higher moment..

    • @jrimman
      @jrimman 2 ปีที่แล้ว

      @@Structural_analysis oh i see… thanks 🙏

    • @Structural_analysis
      @Structural_analysis 2 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      @@jrimman
      im not sure about shell thin because shells you have membrane + flextural stiffness
      But in a real slab you have only flexural stifness.. nothing with membrane action (not develping inplane action such as a peice of baloon which is fully membrane behvaiour). Therefore correct idealization should be "plate".
      Membrane - inplane stifness
      Plate- out of plane stifness
      Shell- both inplane and out of plane stifness
      but for this model you will takes the forces and moments to design the beams and frames..
      So with membrane assumption, conservative design.

    • @jrimman
      @jrimman 2 ปีที่แล้ว

      @@Structural_analysis yeah I totally agree with you. Concrete slabs should be considered as a plate section. The conservative design of making frames stronger is also convincing.

    • @jrimman
      @jrimman 2 ปีที่แล้ว

      But if i am right! The tension reinforcements in slab will provide membrane action in concrete slab.