Great discussion! Would love to see more Atheist (or Theist) philosophers of religion in the future. As Oppy points out, it's truly one of the more public facing areas of philosophy.
GREAT channel, episode, and host. Bravo. Speaking of Joe Schmid, his book on Classical Theism is arguably the most important atheological treatise since Sobel's Logic and Theism (especially the problems posed by abstracta). What a great guest he'd make. And Amy Karofsky: Go Parmenides!
Great interview! Oddly enough I found your channel through the Brad Schoenfeld episode on muscle hypertrophy but I love Grahams work and I’m glad to have found a channel with wide ranging interests
@@thotslayer9914 That’s a very broad question. I personally think a lot of a metaphysics is deeply confused. Questions about composition, possibility, the existence of numbers, etc. are too unclear to have answers. As such, I don’t think these should be treated as serious areas of inquiry.
The kind words are endlessly appreciated😁
Excellent episode - Graham is an absolute legend, as always.
Majesty of Reason is a great channel! This episode was awesome! Thanks!
Great discussion! Would love to see more Atheist (or Theist) philosophers of religion in the future. As Oppy points out, it's truly one of the more public facing areas of philosophy.
GREAT channel, episode, and host. Bravo. Speaking of Joe Schmid, his book on Classical Theism is arguably the most important atheological treatise since Sobel's Logic and Theism (especially the problems posed by abstracta). What a great guest he'd make. And Amy Karofsky: Go Parmenides!
Awesome!!!
Great guest, always enjoy listening to discussions with Oppy. Gorgeous kitty too 😊
That was great, thanks and congratulations!
Well done, love Oppy!
Great interview! Oddly enough I found your channel through the Brad Schoenfeld episode on muscle hypertrophy but I love Grahams work and I’m glad to have found a channel with wide ranging interests
That is very funny. But I'm glad you found this!!
@@thotslayer9914 That’s a very broad question. I personally think a lot of a metaphysics is deeply confused. Questions about composition, possibility, the existence of numbers, etc. are too unclear to have answers. As such, I don’t think these should be treated as serious areas of inquiry.
@@thotslayer9914 I have, a while back, and I have zero interest in doing that again lol
Don't all ontological arguments depend upon the imaginative powers of the person making the conjecture? Instead of any fact in reality?
here for the cat
🙀🙀🙀🙀 Compare the virtues asap
You guotta bring eric steinhart on bruh 😊
Man, this guy is boring and mumbly. Just shows the total ossification of academia