The Top 10 Best Tanks In 2023-2024 (Main Battle Tanks)
ฝัง
- เผยแพร่เมื่อ 7 ก.ย. 2024
- Because their crews are safe from missiles, bullets, shrapnel, and explosions, tanks have been a game-changer for many armies around the world in every battle. Modern armament systems, including turreted high calibre cannons, machine guns, anti-tank guided missiles, and even rockets, provide each tank a competitive edge in the fields of firepower, mobility, and strength. Several criteria, like as artificial intelligence and remote operational capability, were utilised to determine the 10 best main battle tanks in the world for 2023-24.
Tank Model Credits: TANK ENCYCLOPEDIA
www.tanks-ency...
tanks-encyclop...
tanks-encyclop...
www.tanks-ency...
tanks-encyclop...
tanks-encyclop...
FAIR-USE COPYRIGHT DISCLAIMER
* Copyright Disclaimer under Section 107 of the Copyright Act 1976, allowance is made for "fair use" for purposes such as criticism, commenting, news reporting, teaching, scholarship, and research. Fair use is a use permitted by copyright statute that might otherwise be infringing. Non-profit, educational or personal use tips the balance in favour of fair use.
The Buzz does not own the rights to these videos and pictures. They have, in accordance with fair use, been repurposed with the intent of educating and inspiring others. However, if any content owners would like their images removed, please contact us by email at-thebuzz938@gmail.com.
![[TH] 2024 PMSL SEA Finals D2 | Fall | ต้องรักษาฟอร์ม อย่ายอมให้ใครแซง](http://i.ytimg.com/vi/x38QsGn7A3M/mqdefault.jpg)
T 14 is an excellent "parade" tank
T14 is not even good in parades, because it needs to be towed away at the end :D
Armada? Omen Ada.
It broke down during the parade 😄 🤣
th-cam.com/video/DeJzuo2TsfM/w-d-xo.html
still better than just an ads tank like panther 🤣🤣
@@zulfaniaziz8918, I don't think that any experimental tank should be considered on this list.
The T -14 is so incredible stealth that still the russians cant find him.
T-14 - 20 + tanks were made. Panter only 1 was made.
yes like f-22
@@VFX-TECH we dont need panther. You will have enough trouble with our other cat ;-)
увидишь и не сомневайся, всему своё время , и он выхарит все ваши абгамсы с леопагдами!😂👊✌You will see and don't doubt, all in due time, and he will burn out all your abgamas and leopagdas
@@RANKSTER0815 your army couldnt last a week against ukraine alone 😂😂 what are you talking about
K2 black panther 💪💪👍
Poor country’s M1abrams 😂
The best price/value ratio tank. 👍🤘
Not until he actually goes directly to the battlefield, because it has not been proven the greatness of the black panther k2 tank in battle. Is he really as good as sales say?, And is he as good as a European tank?. I think the battle proven tanks are mostly from Europe and not from Korea, and you could say that K2 is also still new. So we can't be sure of the tank's greatness.
Der heißt Panther.
@@russiantrash. thats only weakness. but k2 got high score more than leopard 2a7 at norway's tank trial recently
@@IsakuItou Dude , Korea is ranked at #6 most powerful country in the world. #7-8 in economic in the world wide. Dude. ㅋㅋㅋㅋㅋㅋ
K-2, whose current operation and detailed specifications are revealed, is the best
oh, K2 is tested in which battle?
It came near last in Iron spear 2023 challenger 2 came first followed by L2's and Abrams 4th
🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣
T 14 never made it off Red Square 🤣
Interesting to note that the Challenger is now the official tank of the Royal Navy ! Also incredibly, it can now fly as it’s apparently an aircraft in the Royal Air Force. Amazing.
Yup - that was a whopper....one of her best....and she has had many 😆
that's good to know then ........................................
British engineering at it's best.
Yeah, that comment at 7mins 35secs also had me wondering, if we're looking at MBT's or planes.
English engineering at its finest. Of course, the English 'invented' the tank.
I don't know why the T-72 and T-80 are not on the list. Those tanks have shown in the Ukraine war to have a technology that none of the other tanks have. It's STEM: Special Turret Ejection Mechanism. The turret gets blasted into the sky when hit by a anti-tank round. Very impressive! 😂
the russians just found out why automatic shell loading is not always a good idea when there is no separation of crew from ammunition
LOL
Why will they include Soviet era tanks
Best comment yet 🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣
@@lolo-vz8mh Automatic loader is from 60s, nobody in that time used them! " After the battle everyone is a general" Armata have this capsula yet.
SEPv4 is already being prioritized over SEPv3 in production. It's essentially what the SEPv3 was meant to include but wasn't ready in time.
SEPv4: has new 3rd Gen FLIR for Gunner and TC, the M1147 is actually being debuted on SEPv4, or it's the first to be operational with M1147. Has new Laser warning receiver combined with ROSY rapid obscurant system.
Thunderhorse 2-12 Cavalry Regiment of US Army already fielding as of January 2023...
The SEPv4 project was just canceled in favor of the M1E3
Thank you for this. K2 MBT is designed for tough terrain and harsh weather in Korea. Watch out for K3 model 2030.
The kf-51 MBT seems to have a lot of integrated systems integrated into all its integrated systems.
Now it is shown only as a test produced one.
dream
LECLERC is kicking everybody since few years in every competition but 7th place... 🤣🤣🤣
Honestly the French Leclrec is probably in the top 5. It’s pretty impressive.
Kf-51 looks gorgeous!!
The LFP looks so penetratable by APFSDS but idk
Germany having 2 tanks in top 10 and even the number 1 spot 🇩🇪😎
And they can balance a beer on their gun 🍺🇩🇪😎
Send a bunch to Ukraine!
Germans losers 🤣🤣
@@thekochdieselskils5506 Germany and US sending tanks be like
Abrams arriving in Kiev 1 week too late: Sorry there was a puddle of mud UwU
Leopard 2 arriving 1 Month later: sorry I just conquered Moskau Duh
@@hansudowolfrahm4856 meanwhile uwu duh bruh moskau has 7000+ nuclear bombs
Gotta give it to the Germans they build armour like it’s an art 🤩
If you mean expensive and superficial then I'd agree with you.
The Leopard 2A6 isn’t that good or the M1A2 they both have been destroyed by men in turbens who ride donkey’s.
The visuals of the kf51 are mostly made for marketing purposes and not actually efficiency, you could use excuses like radar absorbent materials and such but by looking at rheinmetalls current proposals you can tell it's just for marketing, and i get to say this because I'm german
@@jamesglass4842 the 2a6 hasn't seen any losses in the slightest, the only cases of anything later than 2a4 being damaged was IED's and those never destroyed them, canadian 2a6m's saw no major damage while a danish 2a5 was immobilized by an IED and killed the driver, all other leopard 2 losses were mainly leopard 2a4's operated by turkey
The camo is butt ugly though
Leclerc is better than Leopard 2, the military experts have concessus on this point.
j'en suis pas si sûr, le leclerc manque un peu de blindage, son systeme de visée est cependant meilleur. c'est pas pour rien que la prochaine collab franco-allemande reprend une partie du chassis du leopard et une partie de la tourelle du leclerc pour l'embt.
aussi, dans l'éfficacité d'un tank, on prend en compte son coût, ce qui est le plus gros point faible du leclerc.
KF51 Panther is rather techno;ogy demonstrator not operational yet....
t-14 armata - this is truly a parade tank
If they didn’t show you, a moron, it doesn’t mean that there is no tank. The best tank in the world is its Ukrainian stronghold, it drags its tractor behind it.
….and it broke down during said parade
@@joemajarucon9090 You're lying. The tank stopped during a parade rehearsal due to a mechanic's mistake. You only know how to lie, lie and lie again.
From April 2015- the headline:
Did the ‘World’s Deadliest Tank’ Just Break Down?
A new T-14 Armata main battle tank was apparently unable to cross Red Square during parade rehearsals.
This took me 3 minutes to find. Ironically during your name calling I read about sadistic people. Relax my friend…breathe and get off that ledge. Happy new years
@@joemajarucon9090 I have nothing to do with Russia and the Eastern Slavs. However, when some people start telling lies from any side, it looks like impotent malice. I can name any weapon from any country that has broken with even greater disgrace. And here is such a trifle: an experienced tank stopped during a rehearsal due to a mechanic's mistake. Ha ha ha, how funny. But it is not customary for Russophobes to talk about their masters, they are "ideal" after all. Happy New Year everyone!😁
Modern tanks are better than ever but so are
anti-tank weapons, thus the brave people who operate the tanks are very vulnerable and risk their lives as much as the infantry, just imagine. Hot, small spaces, poop bags and sweat in the air.
Thank y’all Tank Corps & All others for keepin ’ us free
Armata? Are you JOKING?! :D
Yeah that tank is a whole joke 😂😂😂😂
How so? Your western tanks failed miserably in ukraine. A t-72 destroyed both abrams and leopard with one shot
Cope@jancecd8466
The first is a tank still in development, and the 3rd is for parade without any additional armor on the turret.
Leclerc won tank challenge ,2022...
T-14 cannot be 3rd best tank in the world, because still nobody has any idea what is that. There are only a dozen of prototypes, that does not mean it exists.
Why was the kf51 panther included but not the abrams x? They’re both developmental tanks that are not in full production or being fielded
Probably unawareness.
well... the abram x is a technology showcase, its not gonna be an actual tank.
@@rudolfcsampai9549 neither is the KF51 , it doesn't have any orders what so ever.
@@Jasontvnd9
mate, rheinmetall waiting on the paperwork. if its done, they will finish the tank off in i dunno, maybe half a decade...
at the same time the abram x is a concept, to show off the applicable technologies.
the us army would be a fool to buy new tanks with inferior guns, after the gun of the rheinmetalls panther. putting german guns on us tanks isnt unusual anyway :)
@@rudolfcsampai9549 a 120MM gun thats good enough is better than a 130mm thats overkill , The DM73 thats coming out for the l55A1 gun has 790 - 900mm of penetration according to Rheinmetal.
What does anyone have that stops that round?
The 130mm is huge in comparison , Needs an autoloader , More space in the tank , more space in the logistical line.
Just watch the Panther will not get ordered , Its ok saying Rheinmetal are waiting on the paperwork but they have really no say in the matter , without orders its useless.
It is an honor for the k2 black panther to be ranked 4th among world tanks. thanks for hyundai 🇰🇷
Abrams is 4th Challenger 2 is first after Iron spear 2023
Challenger 2 should be top 3.
Top 3 is black panther, leopard 2 and challenger 2
Agreed
Underpowered, way to heavy and tend to get stuck in the ground according to the ukranians who use it.
I mean the t14 unmanned turret is kind of a good idea. Although i think it couldve gone with a lower turret, it looks tall(or maybe its just narrow)
1-Abrams, 2-K2
동의. 조금 수정해야 하지만 1.에이브람스(미군용) 2. K-2흑표 3. 레오파르트2
쓴 사람 한국인 , 댓글인 한국인
LOL
I don't think Germany has the capability to produce that kf-51 tank realistically. Might be able to make a few for parades.
Any inputs on this?
More than that, there are 2 MBT projects in Germany : The KF-51 (purely German) and The European MBT (France-Germany). How are they going to handle this situation ?
The British challenger 2 is the best in the world to date. I'm ex US army. And I would love to have gone into battle in the British tank back in 91 and 03.
Plus it makes the best sound of any current serving tank.👌
And I would like to see how you knead mud or snow in Ukraine on this heavy tank with low specific power. But we will all see it soon.
There is a video of how a lighter Abrams cannot drive up a snow-covered hill.
Maybe the Brit will do better.
It will also be interesting to see how a tank with shots unique to it. will work with Ukrainian logistics.
It is heavier than e.g. the Leo 2 and the Leclerc but has an engine with 300 fewer horsepower than both, thus making it much slower than the two. How is that better?
Ukranians complain about it being underpowered and way to heavy so it gets stuck in the ground alot of the time.
@@einundsiebenziger5488 you're complaining about power. Power doesn't define a tank, weapons, systems and sensors do. The british tank is world leading. Abrams and ch2 are beasts and powerhouses
Leclerc 7th Lel, just won every competition in 2022
Can anything made in Russia, really be considered in any top lists after seeing how they're doing in Ukraine?
Challenger 2. Abrams m1A2 Leopard 2a6. In any order. Beat all others on list.
Yes. Except for the Leopard 2A7V which is already in service.
Ambrams shits on both
Ukraine complains about the ch2 being underpowered, too heavy and slow and tends to get stuck in the ground. A competition proves nothing.
The majority of MBT's listed have one thing in common...no combat experience, not battle-tested...keep in mind, two most important factors these lists miss is the impact of crew training/experience & proper doctrinal employment
I agree about 90 %, Closest one to have even seen any combat is the Abrams but a few versions prior. Unproven and untested equipment needs proving and training to be operated correctly.
The M1 has plenty of battle experience, the rest of them have never stepped track in a real battle situation. With all this technology, these tanks are armed with how are they really going to react in battle situations in the mud and muck and weather situations. I hope we never have to find out.
@@johnroof2663 I also agree with not needing to find out. Unfortunately humanity hasn't learned enough yet to actually move past our own petty differences and become Human kind. That said, eventually some of these big dogs will go head to head. Pretty is not what or how I would describe any of it. What we have recently learned in Ukraine is all the cool and bad ass tech in the world is not and will not win the war for you. Russia is exposed with awesome weaponry and no tactics and all the corruption that can be. China, France, South Korea, even Japan. Truly have not fired real shots in anger in over 70 years. Are their Doctrines and tactics as old as Russia's? Probably not, but that question does linger and make you wonder. Russia the world's second largest and best armies on earth. BS, they suck!!
That is so, we found out that the Russian tanks could be made instant convertibles, lol. By simple drones and anti-Tank missiles. Russia thought they could go into the Ukraine and just overwhelmed them with a mechanize force and at the end of the game all the Russians did was give the Ukraine more armor to use against them, because the training of the former Soviet Union is horrific. It's only known for people who are geeks about military force. The US has been training Ukrainian forces for quite a while now, and it shows.
The challenger 2 has seen combat and has the longest confirmed tank kill
Yeah Russian tanks, are doing really well in Ukraine, Ex Royal Navy myself, I never remember seeing a Challenger aboard, all 72 tons of it, even after a good drink ashore!
Talking as if most other tanks would operate well in such an anti tank rich environment.
At the moment, Soviet (Russian tanks) are the best, since the rest of the tanks have not yet shown anything in a real war ...
@@arimakishou8605 The Abrams has seen plenty of combat. Look into the Battle Of 73 Easting for context. The only thing Russian built tanks are good at is popping their turrets.
@@classicgalactica5879 I’ve seen plenty popped Abrams turrets, they are competing. Russia’s tanks are better for any environment except for the desert, where they still perform good.
Armata is so smart and advanced that it didn't appear in war in Ukraine. Just realised its not worth it :)
Just like the US/Germany are scared of sending in their Abrams/Leopards because they know they will be easily blown up.
Or because it’s fully operational yet since there are like 14 at most 🤷🏾♂️
It's got invisible tech.
Panthers and T-14??? At this point we may as well add baneblades and mammoth tanks to the list.
No, kanzali
Leeman Russ comes in 11th place. Though I have no doubt, that the Panther will easily make top of the list, once it gets into production.
Hmm 🤔 okay don’t remember the Challenger two being an aircraft care to explain 🤨
"#1 tank in the world is this one but it doesn't actually exist yet"
1. panther kf51 2. leopard 2a7+ 3. abrams x (the 2. and 3. can be switched as they both are good)
Kf51 is an prototype.
1.Abrams sepv3
2.Leo2 A7
3.Type 99
4.K2 BP
5. Leclerc
6.Merkava Mk4
7. Challenger 2
@Sergiu Roman this , KF51 is a tech demonstrator , Surely if that's fine then so is challanger 3 which is actually being produced.
lets be honest its abrams first everyone else last
@@soulsreaper7145 Nah... Leopards have always outclassed the Abrams in a great many combined exercises. I now see the Abrams and the Leopard 2 as equals. Both follow an extremely similar doctrine. I can't assess the K2 and the Type 99 because I don't have any real comparisons. But I would say anything with a red star has to be divided by 2 to get an acceptable result.
Chinese weapons are very high tech thesedays, not to be taken essy
Should any Russian/Soviet tank be on this list? T14 is not a tank, it is a mock up they are incapable of even realistic field testing.
I think that in order to be called a top tank, it should meet a few essential criteria. It should be in general production or have at least 500 units in active service. It should have seen combat and performed well against enemy armor. It should have a high availability rate (i.e.: not broken down, and able to go into combat). If it is so complicated that it can't withstand the rigors of training or combat,. If it can't, then what good is it? The T-14 Armada shouldn't be on this list because even though it was revealed in 2015, how come there are less than 100 in existence? Many of these tanks like the KF-51 is still in development but the Leopard 7 should be included. If you titled this video "Next generation tanks coming on line," then all can be included. So let's keep this limited to the tanks actually in production and on the battle field right now.
Bro 500 in service would mean leclerc and challenger are not qualified france and GB both only have 200 in service.
@@fk4410 Yes that's the issue. No matter how great the tank, if you don't have them in sufficient numbers, their effect is minimal. The T-14 Armada is a prefect example, there are only about 100 made even though it was introduced back in 2015.
My thoughts exactly.
@@stevensrhester8594 there are even only 20 made I think of the t14 so this should definitely be off the list but 50 could be a good number since you can build quite a good force, not a whole army though
@@fk4410 500 seems arbitrarily high, but actual battlefield experience would be a major plus. Absent that, enough numbers to actually have been tested. The Challenger has combat experience, and designs were modified as a result. Until the thing gets shot at, you never know what the weaknesses are.
Tanks alot for the informative video.
Apologies for the smart assed comments on the smart tank.
TBH, I couldn't resist.🙄
Merkava has 500% more war experience than everyone else combined
And 2006 Lebanon war. And 1982 then they performed better.
But not necessarily in tank-on-tank engagements...we've yet to see those capabilities in combat
@@mjyous And against your mum they did really well
@@lubeman62 so true
@@user-uf5cs2lm7z mum?🤣🤣🤣 out of jokes? So old and boring🤣🤣! Maybe watch comedy shows and come with something better then that😝 little keyboard gangster
T14 is a excellent tank really it’s not like it’s not mass produced or even as good as Russia media have actually said
😆😆😆😆😆
Now these altra modern war machine are sitting ducks for drones...
Yep. A massive waste of money and resources better invested in air and ground based drones.
The best battle tank is Ukrainian soldier on dirtbike with Javelin :)
@@linearswitchguy9593 Your analysis got a bit technical for me there .
@@linearswitchguy9593 hmm the evidence is very apparent
Ακόμα καλύτερο είναι το ρωσικό kornet με τριπλάσιο βεληνεκές.
100% Mobility. 100% stealth. 100% destruction of an enemy tank. not expensive
Considering what I have heard from former U.S officers is the Javelin has been a failure.
T-14 has so an amazing stealth ability that no one have ever seen it😂
Go to Russia and find out, they literally showed it a lot, cope harder I guess☠️
Honestly challenger 2 is the best tank there not to diss the others they are all good but anyone who has fought alongside it will tell you the same thing regardless of which nation their from
Lol No way near Leo 2
@@Christopher_Rock fair enough where you serve
Leo 2 in any Way
@@Christopher_Rock Leopard 2s and M1A2 have been defeated by RPG ..Challenger 2 Armour has not been even defeated my any enemy so far. As for the original mark of Leopard 2 it collided with a Challenger 1 and the armour split on the Leopard.
@@jamesglass4842 when did a rpg defeat the Leopard and Abrams?
And at number 10, the kyu maru, capable of shooting down Godzilla
Tanks are still very important in modern warfare 👍👍👍
No not at all , 6 a-10 warthogs , can destroy dozens upon dozens of tanks within minutes?
@@seanconservativeburke Only the US uses them AFAIK. so your argument isn’t a strong one. Not even sure if the A10 can effectively penetrate modern armor
@@JohnLee-db9zt even if they couldn't they have very heavy ordinance.
Only because the military leadership of so many countries are out of touch old men. The war in Ukraine proves they are absolutely obsolete like Battleships. A better approach would be to replace them with ground drones, as well as AI controlled vehicles
It would be great a list of the best Medium Main Battle Tanks in the world.
Why are Chinese tanks here?? Is it AliExpress toy sales ranking?
😂😭🤣
How do you know about AliExpress
Turns out after NATO competition that Challenger mkII is the best.always being underated has its uses.
It's actually second place behind the abrams in running away from battle
Its best in the competition due to its crew. In ukraine they complain that its underpowered, slow and heavy and gets stuck in the ground alot.
For me, modern tanks will be manufactured very little due to the lack of resources. The armor of the tank contains special minerals that make it difficult to penetrate, especially modern tanks.
The special minerals: steel, rubber and air
there only manufactored so slowly because most countries only have 1 tank factory going in non war times. hence why russia was is only able to make like 20 tanks a month right now
@@soulsreaper7145 In Russia, there are 2 fully tank plants and 5 armored plants. 2 develop, produce tanks at any time. 5 can do it, but they don't specialize in it, they only upgrade tanks.Information about 1 plant is not correct, since 2 tank plants are owned by one company, and 1 of the plants is called the same as the company)
@@soulsreaper7145 ... they're* (!) only manufactured*
@@Borov1984 ... there are two full* tank plants and five armored vehicle* plants.
you put Challenger 2 at number 8 it's the best tank in the world it's never been destroyed
Well, the thing which surprised me the most in this video is the fact she doesn't say a word on the huge advantage the Leclerc XL has on his counterparts.
He's the only tank which can shoot at full speed, on every type of terrain with 98% accuracy meanwhile all the others must slow down near halfspeed and only have 50%.
It's not the best tank but shouldn't be 7th on this list.
Abrams can shoot accurately on the move as well, it's got smart stabilization.
Absolute nonsense! C2 can fire and hit at full speed beating all other mbt's in iron spear 2023 and is the best protected of them all!
t14 armata tanks are the best especially on parades
alot of these turret mounted sensors look very vulnerable to damage !! problem is , will the tank be able to function without them if they get damaged or blown away by explosion ???
Been wondering the same.
Few of this tanks has been in a battle, and proven themselves good enough.
How does a Chinese tank belong here? It's better not to talk about a sloppy tank that has changed its appearance without expertise.
What a ridiculous list. KF-51 still under development. Armata at no 3, even though it enormous issues in commissioning and hasn't even gone into proper production. Other MBTs ahead of Challenger 2 that have never ever been proven in battle. What's the point?
The point is to generate comments like yours....that is all.
Ukranians complain about the chally2. saying its underpowered, too heavy and tend to get stuck in the ground.
ยอดเยี่ยมครับ❤เกาหลีใต้
Thanks I've seen & also I expected like that best Tanker could be Abrahams or any from Germany 👍from 🇹🇿 🇹🇿 🇩🇪🇩🇪 🇺🇸
I like that you said any tank from germany i also thing that the panzerkraftwagen 2 from the 1930s could have also gotten on the first place 😂
No.1 should be the Leopard 2A7, No.2 is M1A2, No.3 is Merkava. 🏆
It’s funny about the Merkava - it’s like a Challenger 2 that recently burst from an anti-tank missile system.
Putting T-14 Armata high on this list destroys its credibility.
The T-14 has not shown up for battle in the Russo-Ukraine War.
Too many questions about production quality and maintenance to be included.
Like the German tank's in ww2 too difficult to produce in large enough numbers.
Yeah, your complaint has all the sense, because you point to the T14 but you said nothing about a mockup tank likes the Panther, that don't have any operational prototype running in anywhere.
@@user-iz6ki3hi5k Not sure what you mean. The German Leopard tanks do exist, and they are in use.
I would take the challenger 2 over the armata
Them T-14 are going to pile up in the junk yard fast. Unfortunately they will breakdown before they get drilled full of holes. More russian scrap iron
T-14 Armata is third best on this list, it has been years since it came out. They must have produced hundreds and hundreds of them by now!!! Funny thing, no one has seen it in live combat, wonder why??? Maybe it is just as good as the aircraft carrier Russia has built which continues to catch on fire!!!
KF-51, sep3 was in combat?
If it's still "under development" it is not operational in a real world situation yet. Should not be on the list when it's not been cleared for operational production.
This rank cant be for them. It depends on the situation.
For confirmation, KF51 Panther goes up to 70 kph not 105
Leclerc is a Rolls Royce, Leopard is a 4x4. You don't to war with a Rolls Royce, that's why Leopards are the most common and the ones Ukraine is asking for. Even if the Leclerc is better in every aspect.
Leopard isn’t that good as they can be defeated by RPGs. Considering what is being sent ..it’s all going to be 1 to 10 or far more than that ratio in favour of t Russian Army that is massing possibly 600’000 men at the moment. Most of the armour engaged has been the breakaway provinces vehicles. We shall know when the dam breaks if the MSM tell us..remember they have been pushing a false narrative.
The A7B Sturmpanzerwagen is definitely the best tank.
T-14. Baddest beast tank on paper !!!
Most weapons of Russia are 10 times better as NATO ones. Well... Russian fairy tail of propaganda.
leclerc in 7th, what a joke , it's one of the most effective tank in the world, combat proven.
Newest Abrams is A2 SEPV4! Remember, it's for 2023 and the EMBT is also a concept tank that could be included!
T 14 may be expensive but it’s not prone to failure in front of putin
KF51 ia a tank that does not exist yet,same for T14🤣🤣🤣
It exists but is not really produced yet.
i am sure that it would be informative if the diction of the presenter was better.
Arn't those the SaMe German tanks that Von Der Lyen simply let RoT during her tenure as German defense chief? I'm amazed that they work at all.
Haha youre mad😂
Kramp and Lambrecht are the same.
Panther KF 51 not
The best thing you can do with tanks and war machines is to let them rot, unless there's an enemy at your border. Thanks Von Der Lyen!
Where is Japan Type10tank?
To bad
You forgot Swedish strv 122 with some other upgrades, otherwise it is similar to Leopard. It is supposed to be first or second on that list, otherwise they probably fit quite well
This is just an export-variant Leopard 2 with a few upgrades for Sweden. Export tanks are always worse than real ones. Their upgrades are making them better for country specifics like terrain\climate, but not really improving their main battle aspects.
Besides, this is still are Leopard 2 MBT, even if slightly downgraded. But not really worth this list.
Ha haaa it’s similar!? It’s literally a Leopard 2 export version 😅😅
u are so confused its a exsport version and theres never been a export that's even remotely as good as the original, thats why only domestic made tanks make these lists
The STRV 122 is not the same as an leopard 2. It is specialized with a Swedish armor company. It is considered to be the best tank in the world. It’s not a Leopard 2, it is something else.
th-cam.com/video/xyq6s8hrl4A/w-d-xo.html
It's way down the list Challenger 2 is no1 after winning Iron spear the world MBT competition C2 first L2 second and third and Abrams fourth the rest no idea
T90M not being here but challenger 2 is crazy.
79 T90's destroyed by an army using mainy 60 year old Soviet tanks, 1 challenger 2 destroyed in history by a mine followed by artillery strikes. Challenger 2 crew survived, doubt the T90 crews made it out.
@@James-sh4zf 79 is false it’s 24. Also all tanks are vulnerable to anti tank mine, artillery, and anti tank weapon. Just because west lies about their eco do tanks with first gen thermals is not my issue.
@@NahIdWin995 there are 77 photos of separate, destroyed T90 tanks on War Spotting. "Just because west lies about their eco do tanks", nice English mate, you have brain damage or something?
@@James-sh4zf You didn’t even see how leopards2 in Syria exploded from Soviet anti-tank missiles: many photographs of leopards 2a4 are with the turret torn off.
@@isadanjan4762 so, I was commenting on Challenger 2's in Ukraine, not Leopards in Syria.
The T-14 White Elephant.
I think T-14 denotes the quantity that have been built?
7:13 ...Royal Navy??
Ah! Oman Royal Navy..makes sense now.
The T-14 managed to break down in a parade, has (i beleave night vision) optics avalable on the civillian market, uses a modified engine from the famously unreliable tiger tank, wrighs (i think) 20 tons less then the challenger and is SLOWER, can barley defend itself agenst 90s missiles, basically the t-14 would of been a good tank if it was made in 1990, plus its touch screen has to be clawed at like a desperate person, i reccomend lazerpig's video on the t-14 to get more detail on why the t-14 accutaly sucks.
... I believe* / weighs* 20 tons less than* / defend itself against* missiles / T-14 would have* (!) been - "would of" makes no sense and it's stupid to put it in writing! / I recommend* / why the T-14 actually* sucks
Tiger 1 wasnt as unreliable as repeated these days. It just got that reputation because revisionists didnt like the reputation it had from the veterans who fought it. According to readiness numbers for 1943 the panzer 4 had an average of 61%, the tiger 55 and the panther 54%. Thats pretty good for a tank so famous for breaking down before it reaches the battlefield.
The best tanks up to 2023 are unqestionably the Merkova the Abrams and the Challenger based on numbers usage operational losses to the enemy and service records.
The article seeks to examine the best tanks going forward.
Likely these will be the Armata 14 when debugged and produced in significant numbers the Abrams in some varient the Leopard in some varient and the South Korean K2 of which Poland just ordered 700.
Right now the Chinese Thpe 99 is an unknown quantity.
All of the tanks listed are good all have advantages and disadvantages in certain operating conditions and all depend on the training and ability of their crews.
If the Type 99 is made in Chiva it will probably barely move.
Συγκροτημένη και τεκμηριωμένη άποψη χωρίς ιδεολογικές παρωπιδες.
What I've heard from anyone who has served in, or worked on Abrams tanks, it sounds like they are piles of crap. Reading war stories, they were missing half of the equipment and hardware that they were supposed to have, and the other half wasnt hooked up or working. They guzzle gas like no other, and don't like sand and heat. Historically, the US isn't exactly renowned for making quality tanks. They just make a LOT of them.
T14 Armata has a poorly armored turret, such a tank is easy to eliminate on the battlefield. Plus a weak engine and not proven in battle autoloader. In theory and in parades it is beautifully, worse in combat.
It is not yet known what K2PL will ultimately be like
The first one is still in development lol
leclerc xlr !! fire touch at 60 kmh💥💤.....slavia ukraine 💛💙 winner iron spear 2019
Bro Saying that t 14 armata is weaker than M1 Abrams and Leopards 2 tanks and that's why abrams x and t 14 armata Is on the rivalry
Isn't the T-99 the same tank that keeps breaking down at the international tank competition in Russia? Seems like something goes wrong or it places at the bottom every year, badly trained crews or is it the tank?
The tank still have some flaws. It is new and China doesn't have much experiencing with building tanks.
It was T96 at the Russia competition not T99A. T96 is the cheaper version for mass production. The newest model is T99A. Russia did not allow T99 to join the competition because Russians don't want T99 to win it.
Well It's not merkava 5 (which means new design) Its the same design as the merkava 4 (which entered service in 2003). This is why its actually called Merkava 4 Barak. The new changes changes are improved Iron dome APS, new panoramic cameras and more new features.
You mean Trophy not Iron Dome…
Challenger is clearly the best, as it can apparently fly off the deck of the HMS QUEEN ELIZABETH! 🤣
THAT'S why the ramp is there! 😱
Slava Ukraine 🇺🇦
You call the “ in development “ panther as number one? Let’s see it in action first
The T-14 is a paper Tiger. Everyone knows that now.
Bro is speaking like he has seen it, whee did you see it💀💀
I’m curious if the US will adopt Abramsx or another tank before long.
I am waiting to see Japanese sells their tank.
They have very strict weapon export laws. They don't even export their rifles.
@@RandomGuy9 Soon we can see they export their war ship and radars
The only real large-scale mass production tank available here is the k-2 tank
In real. The best tank is a cheap, massive, relatively light and simple tank, with the possibility of field repairs and movement on civilian bridges and roads.
It is wrong to call the best tanks, which were built less than 3 dozen units, which require their own infrastructure, and high-tech sites and engineers with higher education are needed for maintenance.
т-80-90
It depends entirely on the characteristics of the conflict: geographical context, technological means of the enemy, availability of spare soldiers, …
By that logic the T-34 should be the best tank of ww2 yet it was incredibly cramped, hard to use(crew were practically blind) and the USSR lost nearly 90% of 50000+ made during the war. It was hard to survive too compared to US or german tanks since it sacrifised escape hatches for sloped armor which didnt even do its job properly contrary to what tank documentaries would have you believe. It broke down more often than the tiger too yet you never hear about it.
@@benjammin3381
Where did you find such fairy tales?
Read serious sources and not political articles by people far from technology.
@@dimushka383 I did. Stalin himself issued this order:
‘Our armored forces and their units frequently suffer greater losses through mechanical breakdowns than they do in battle. For example, at Stalingrad Front in six days twelve of our tank brigades lost 326 out of their 400 tanks. Of those about 260 owed to mechanical problems. Many of the tanks were abandoned on the battlefield. Similar instances can be observed on other fronts. Since such a high incidence of mechanical defects is implausible, the Supreme Headquarters sees in it covert sabotage and wrecking by certain elements in the tank crews who try to exploit small mechanical troubles to avoid battle.
Henceforth, every tank leaving the battlefield for alleged mechanical reasons was to be gone over by technicians, and if sabotage was suspected, the crews were to be put into tank punishment companies or "degraded to the infantry" and put into infantry punishment companies.'