A while back I found out about FLM tripods from Canada. I bought the FLM CP34-L4 and I really like it. This model expands extra high. Weight is 4 lb 10 oz or so. Much cheaper than Gitzo and RRS.
I have a setup from Pro Media Gear with their Katana GK Jr gimbal head and their TR344L legs and I absolutely love it. I’ve owned RRS TVC-34L legs and I’d take the PMG ones over those any day. They’re lighter, cheaper, extend higher, and are shorter when fully collapsed. I’ve never owned Gitzo legs but I have a Gitzo monopod and I think the build quality of the Pro Media Gear stuff is noticeably better. Their gimbal also is like half the weight of a Wimberley but is still rated for 50lbs (I use mine with a 600 IS II and R3/R5 and I’ve never had any issues with stability). Highly recommend them!
I have a ProMediaGear TR424L Pro-Stix Carbon-Fiber Tripod with Top Plate (Black, 77") I use it with a Wimberley WH-200 it’s a great Tripod in my opinion. However I rarely use it since my main setup is a ProMediaGear TR34M 34 Series Carbon Fiber Monopod I use it with a Wimberley mono-gimbal & carry it in a dual harness military flagpole holder. Every bit as good as a tripod but with added mobility & cheaper. I use this with my 600mm f/4 II prime, extenders, R5 with battery grip. Can hold & hike with this setup for hours. It’s like hand holding your EF 600 II prime rock steady with no fatigue. I do use my tripod for backyard shots, long exposure, focus stacking etc but that’s kind of rare.
Leofoto offers an excellent line of tripods in various configurations. I like them a great deal. I have two - one medium and one quite heavy. They are very well made.
@@jan_wegener For my heavy set up I settled on the LM 364C. My lighter weight set up is LS-284CEX. The light one is perhaps better described as light/medium. It is pretty darn stout, about as light as I want to go. There are many different configurations available so you can pretty much find what you are looking for as far as weight and features etc. I can't say enough about how happy I am with these tripods.
I know Innorel is a more "budget" option, but I've had the Innorel rt90c, and it's been beat to shit in all weather conditions along the Great Lakes and it keeps it holds up to the bigger competition and asking for more. I know there's better out there for way more money, but For a sub $300 usd tripod, it's a tank.
Would like to see a quality test between canon rf 800 5.6 and new Nikon 800 6.3. 800 smaller than 600 sounds great but Is such a price difference justified? Hope this is your new “big white lens”🤞
(Sorry. I'm poor at English😅) Thank you for the great videos👍 6:59 I have strongly insisted since July 2020 at the latest that Canon wouldn't release APS-C camera body and lens in RF system for not cinema camera, but still camera. The reasons I presume are shown below. (1) Customers and users who want a budget price camera are mainly classified as two groups. The persons belong to the one group could not concern about specifications and could be satisfied with camera kit like EF-M system. Several years later, they almost wouldn't buy a next interchangeable lens camera. The other words, provide of EF-M and EF-S systems are worth keeping unless net deficit. While the persons belong to the other group couldn't have enough budget, they are interested in photography and/or videography and they want to improve their skill and equipments. The other words, most important thing for them is not image sensor size, but simply price. Their ideal camera is a budget price one using "high speed present generation" FF sensor. I'm calling this camera "R9" which is similar in design to R6 with EVF and flip screen in spite of intensive cost reduction. One of the biggest missions on "R9" is a bridge the gap in videography between M50/M50ii and mid range like R6. While Canon well understood Sony APS-C series like A6*** occupy this gap several years ago, they didn't take measures during long years. On viewpoint of videography, Canon is building their ecosystem, including "R9", R6, R5, R3, R5C, C70, C300iii, C500ii and so on. (2) Regarding APS-C still camera, the rest meaning of existence is crop effect. However, it's extremely difficult the balance between price and high performance; high speed burst shooting, durability etc. I'd like to remind, especially, photographers who need high speed burst shooting that the rolling shutter effect using equivalent technology on image sensor is directly proportional to not image sensor size, but numbers of pixels. The sales period of 7D2 which price was roughly $2000 was about four years; from 2014 to 2018. If the price of 7D2 successor would be almost as same as R6, the demand of this successor should be very small. Therefore, I think "R9" should have high priority to 7D2 successor. I'm interested in "Kokomo" VR platform. If it would be successful a few years later, many people should have headsets for "Kokomo". Therefore, it could increase demand for "EOS VR System" contents shot by professional videographers and filmmakers. Of course, "R5C and RF5.2mm F2.8 L Dual Fisheye" is the best equipments for "EOS VR System". For your information: Canon has introduced key parts as shown below. --- introducing Dual Pixel technology --- *S35 image sensor for cinema cameras: C300 (01/2012), C100 (11/2012) -- introducing Dual Pixel technology in 2012 and DPAF thanks to update in 11/2013 *APS-C image sensor for still cameras: 70D (08/2013) -- introducing DPAF --- low speed previous generation --- *APS-C image sensor for still cameras: 80D (03/2016) and 11 models (11/2016 - 11/2020) *FF image sensor for still cameras: 5D4 (08/2016), R (09/2018) *FF image sensor for still cameras: 6D2 (06/2017), RP (02/2019) *Image processor for still cameras: DIGIC 8 (03/2018) -- maybe introduce GPGPU for computing deconvolution *FF image sensor for cinema cameras: C700FF (07/2018), C500ii (12/2019) --- high speed present generation --- *High-speed and intelligent communication system between the lens and the camera body: RF mount (09/2018) -- maybe USB3.1 (12pin, 5Gbps) *APS-C image sensor for still cameras: 90D/M6ii (08/2019) -- maybe delay about 2 years *Image processor for cinema cameras: DIGIC DV 7 (12/2019) *FF image sensor for still cameras: 1DX3 (02/2020), R6 (08/2020) *Image processor for still cameras (and cinema cameras!!): DIGIC X (02/2020) *S35 image sensor for cinema cameras: C300iii (06/2020), C70 (11/2020) -- introducing Dual Gain Output (DGO) *FF image sensor for still cameras: R5 (07/2020), R5C (03/2022) -- 2 line readout same time --- high speed next generation --- *FF image sensor for still cameras: R3 (11/2021)
RRS TVC 33 is fabulous. Mine is 7 years old and still going strong, despite using it frequently in salt water.. Agree that it is very frustrating that everything is out of stock for months.
I think nowadays the only tripod option is Leofoto. I can't see any difference between them and Gitzo, and they're quite a bit less expensive. I'd go with the LM-324CL. It's like the Gitzo 3543xls
100% disagree. Pro Media Gear TR423L or RRS tripods are much better. I have the tallest 42mm diameter PMG TR42ML and matching tripod. Yes I’ve now spent about $3,300 on a monopod and tripod, but they are worth every penny. Especially when you’re using a $10,000+ lens like I am. The Pro Media Gear tripods are rated to 125 pounds capacity. Which is double or triple what Leophoto offers. Night and day difference between the $550 Leophoto and the $1,400 RRS or PMG tripods. My daughter whose 11 years old and 90lbs can easily hang from my tripod apex, both feet off the ground. I have images to prove it!
@@patricksmith2553 I suppose if maximum stability and strength is what you're after then that pro media gear one is good, but with it being almost 2lbs heavier, and double the price of the leofoto I listed, I find it hard to recommend the PMG. Most supertelephotos are quite light these days. Gone are the days of 13lbs 600mm lenses and Gitzo 5 series tripods. I do agree that the build quality of the RRS and PMG is top class.
Tripod: Give Sirui a try - a lightweight carbon fiber or aluminum W-2004 tripod with detachable monopod. I have an older model so cannot say much about the current ones. Of course, super stable will require a heavier brand or model...
@@robgerety Thanks, if I get the chance will try one out. Generally speaking though apart from the ballhead I don't thing the stiffness (as in carbon fiber) doesn't matter that much. There are going to be vibrations from various sources in the environment. If we want true stability then a good old wood tripod is the choice, which is of course not all that portable.
Hanging out for your R3 Review from a Video perspective Jan. I have a Z9 in my hands but still debating the R3 as I know it is a brilliant camera for video. Great low light and focus, weight advantage etc.
Hello Jan. I use the Rollei Rock Solid Gamma Mark II Carbon and I love it. Very stable and light. In addition, the center column can be removed so that photographs can be taken almost at ground level. There is now a Mark III version of it. 😊😊 Regards from Switzerland and take care Michel 😊
I have had a Manfrotto 055Pro tripod for many years and recently bought their BeFree GT XPRO for a travel tripod. However, neither of these take spikes and I decided I needed a much sturdier tripod with spikes. Some of the brands like Gitzo (owned by Manfrotto) are just ridiculously over priced and Manfrotto has also become expensive. After much research, I discovered Artcise which only seems to be available in Australia from Amazon. I ended up with an Arcise AS95C carbon fibre tripod with an Artcise MB52 ball head. It is a beast of a tripod, but not extremely heavy. They have quite a range, so smaller are available. It is beautifully made and I can highly recommend. Great tripod at a reasonable price.
At this point, I guess your ideal camera will be the R1 (if rumors are true). About the tripod, for the last 10 years I use the Sirui M-3205 (Height: 14.5 - 160 cm, weight: 1.6 kg. Maximum load: 15 kg) and I had no problem putting it into the snow, the water, on the rocks and it holds good my gear
Well, Jan, I don't think the Gitzo System 5 is the problem but the lack of assistants to carry stuff for you :) . Systematic 5 has simply been the best in the past 50 years to me. It's the kind of thing you can earmark in your will to posterity. Recent brands are in a way rip-offs. As we shoot digital, we now have incredible sensitivity (as in ISO) and very large dynamic range (15 EV) and this means that motion blur easily becomes visible as a feeling of sub-optimal sharpness (when we pixel peep). Your very long lenses may need a tripod because hand-holding is impractical, but as you want maximum sharpness in your birds, you still want to minimize relying on the camera's VR or whatever it is called. The question then is what kind of vibration a tripod can dampen or resist. The main one is caused by wind. The question is if you ever shoot birds in a (very) windy - i.e. open - habitat. And then I'm not sure if (very) windy weather makes for good bird photography. If you go out in such weather and the birds are out too, then in that (very) windy environment vibration will play a role. And here the heaviest model of the best brand may not do the best job. If you bring a lot of gear to location, like you do, then hanging your camera bag off the center of the tripod keeps a light tripod stable easily, but that bag and strap may increase sensitivity to wind and thin legs more easily vibrate than thicker or heavier ones. Some years ago, I saw this YT video testing sensitivity to vibration of different tripod brand/models and my favorite brand was not the best at that. I briefly searched YT for tripod reviews mentioning vibration to see if I could find it back but the hit list is too long. One genre where absence of vibration may be most important is astro-photography. They would go so far as to place vibration suppression pads under the tripod legs. Might be an idea to also look there for advice. Anyhow, there is no quick answer. I have a very light Manfrotto (MF) carbon traveler but my longest lens is 180mm only and light. With a MF quick release I needed a hex tool to occasionally tighten things and because the magnesium ball head is excellent, I replaced the MF QR plate by an Arca-compatible top plate that can pan. A 40 year old aluminum Slik Master still does a great job in video but the screw-clamp-bushes need occasional removal and cleaning and then I put some PTFE grease in that, again. This one has a very hard and strong grade of aluminum alloy. Gitzo, Sirui, Benro, Leofoto may all be good. To me, Gitzo's qualities plus their accessories make them sort of unbeatable. Photographers always have the wrong, (1) light modifier, (2) camera bag, (3) tripod. The reality is that you need a few of each for different jobs or use cases.
I have your ProSets and your Master Class and have learned a lot from them. I used to use a RRS TVC-24L tripod but found it to be a little on the heavy side for long hikes. I now use the Leofoto LS-284CEX which only weighs 2.93 lbs. and has a built-in 15 degree leveling base. It has a maximum height of 58 inches and a minimum length of 21 inches. I am also using a Manfrotto MVH500AH fluid head which works almost as well as a gimbal but weighs a lot less. I really enjoy all of your videos and look forward to seeing many more.
Jan, which camera-the R3 or the Z9-feels better in your hand with the built-in vertical grip? I know it’s subjective but I’m interested in your thoughts anyway.
Great job as always. I have been contemplating whether to make more videos or just let other do it. Love your content love listening to someone that actually knows how to shoot. Thanks again for all that you do and watching you more and more makes me want to go out and do more videos.
@@jan_wegener I will as you know there are more spectators than ones thst really want to be photographers......everyone has a professional opinion. On something they have never owned or even touched 😀.
Upgraded my old Gitzo to an RRS Versa, which is lighter and stiffer, but the big weight and bulk loss was switching from my Wimberley head to a Flexshooter Pro ball head, giving me great freedom of motion without the worry of the lens and camera flopping over. There are lots of TH-cam videos on the Flexshooter. Yeah, I had to wait two months for my tripod, though.
The biggest weight savings that I found was to get a carbon fiber gimbal. You’d be surprised the difference it makes. Not just in weight, but balance as well. I got one from Benro, but there are many
Thanks for the tip, never really looked into them. Is yours the GH5C or something like that? Do you like it? There seem to be a bunch of cheap ones and a few pricy ones
I would definitely look into Leofoto. Just got LM-324CL. It’s as extra long tripod which might come handy in some situations photographing wildlife. The best part about it is that for ordinary fairly leveled terrain I need to only use 3 out of 4 section which makes it more stable. Btw I’m 6’2” so it should be plant for most of the people. Also they got plenty great accessories so I’m planning to get few including their gimbal head with leveling base.
I am working with the Gitzo GT4542LS for a few years now and am very happy with it(D850 and Z9 with a 600mm FL). As you said a bit lighter than the 5series but sturdy enough for the rig.
Hi Jan I love using the ifootage gazelle tc7 tripod because of the versatility of the legs especially when I am sitting on logs or on the ground you can put your legs in more comfortable positions + it's not to heavy to carry on long hikes when I am doing my own youtube videos . So it might be an option for you . Cheers Derek
Hi Jan ...Looking forward to your thoughts on the R3 I am into my first 3 months with the R3 using the adapter to shoot my EF glass and converter 1.4 . So far... Im loving it. I only shoot stills and at 30 frames a second raw you don't miss a lot especial flight and action. 24 mega px is more than adequate and the pixel quality is gorgeous. Hope you have a great time with your R3s :-))
I have read a lot of good things about the Sony A1 and I am tempted to get one but switching from photo to video seems to be a problem for me. I am also waiting for the R1 as my main camera and the R5 will be my secondary. I think you bought the RF800mm F/5.6. Drool.....
Check out the FLM CP 34 series’s a good compromise in weight vs stability Imho. Weight less than 2 kg while having a higher load capacity than the gitzo
Glad I watched to end to finish with a bit of Sony news, the orignal 24-70mm is a older Sony e lens and was quite a large heavy lens, so I went with the 24-105mm f4 as image quality was similar, but with the improved version being lighter and smaller it sounds like it would be a worth while lens for me now
Another enjoyable and informative video! I wonder if the R6 has that same feature of using the C3 settings when you push the video button during stills shooting? I'm gonna have to check that out.
Jan: Re: new tripod, I can support your notion of the RRS 24L which has replaced my prior Gitzo and larger RRS 34L. I strongly suggest you avoid the RRS 14 which I find too unstable with 600 + 2X shooting. RRS has a very nice fluid gimbal FH-02 which is my preference for mixed stills/video shooting but a bit heavy for travel, where I typically use Flexshooter Pro. I share your frustration with their frequent stocking issues - not sure if this is the usual supply chain issue or if they are in some form of hibernation now... Good luck with new tripod and keep up your great YT work with Glenn B and solo!
Hi there Jan, I noticed the heavy metal Gimbal on your tripod... IMO I'd keep the excellent Gitzo and put your monies towards a lighter carbon gimbal option.. Could be less of an expense.🙃AU
@@jan_wegener I can't say, As I'm using a similar set-up to you - a heavy metal gimbal on the largest carbon Benro TMA48C XL - & I find gimbal to be the heaviest component to carry.. So it seems that we both will appreciate the feed-back from others that may have solved the problem. Cheerz
Another comment mentions and I agree, you might want to give a Gitzo Series 3 Systematic a try. I've been using one for 20 years and have never felt the need for anything bigger and heavier, even with 8 lb. and 10 lb. prime lenses. In fact, my stable of Gitzo Series 3 tripods has now grown to three... One fitted full time with a gimbal, a second fitted with a heavy duty ballhead and gimbal adapter, and a third extra tall version fitted with a ballhead and a column that also can be reversed for very low angle close up work. Perhaps you can borrow a Series 3 and see if it's sufficient for your purposes. With newer cameras and lenses that are more compact, weigh less and have more capable image stabilization, a Series 3 might be all you need. I'm disappointed but not surprised to hear the R7 is likely to be delayed... The R1 too, though that's more out of curiosity since I'm very unlikely to ever buy one.
Hi Jan - I bought the Feisol CT3372 carbon fibre legs and Jobu Design gimbal head… very pleased with them, and a significant saving over Gitzo/Wimberley . Great video, as always 😊
I am very happy with my Gitzo GT4543LS with a FLM ball head (FLM CB 48 FTR II and RRS clamp) but the Gitzo GT4553S seems to be a good compact alternative. However, FLM is producing very good tripods today and when I had to replace my tripod I will certainly look for a FLM 34 or 38 series (with lengths up to 190 cm and load capacity of 50 kg at 2,35 kg).
Well ... take a look at Leofoto LM-404CL ... in my opinion a tripod beast! Combine it with Leofoto YB-100MP and your levelling is made easy ... which I have found really helpful in many situations. And then a Leofoto PG-1 Gimbal on top ... and you are ready ... and definitely steady!!!
Great video. Hope you tested the R3 eye control feature. I have been using Gitzo 3 series for over 10 years for my big Canon prime. It is sturdy and lasts forever. RRS is also great, but its price is a bit higher than Gitzo.
@@jan_wegener I am thinking of buying the Z9 but I have to order it without actually holding it in my hand first. So, my question is this: is the Z9 too heavy with a lens attached to carry around and take pictures for a day?
Check out ProMedia Gear, the 42 series is superb but might be overkill. The 34 series is the perfect balance of weight and stiffness for me - they go from 50 to 70 inches tall, either 3 or 4 sections. Build quality is of the same standard as RRS. They also have a very nice Gimbal if you want to take some weight out. And as a Sony A1 shooter, I will agree that the ergonomics of the Canon R3 are probably my favorite of any camera to date. I just couldn't wrap my head around 24MP but what a stunning camera on every other aspect.
And i forgot... I got the pro-sets a couple weeks ago. I don't know what magic juice you built into those but they are by far the most useable presets I have ever used for wildlife photography. Everything else is just overdone and designed with fashion and life-style in mind - yours work amazingly well and THANK_YOU for giving them names that make sense and are actually related to what they do ("Oops I underexposed" has saved a few more shots last week than I care to admit as i forgot to get out of manual ISO on a burst...). I know a lot of folks are jaded with useless overcooked presets but this is by far my best investment this year.
Hey Jan; Great video as always; What part of Qld did you go; I have another trip to Charlotte plains later this year; Absolutely amazing place, & cant wait to get back there!
Just as well no camera is coming this year. Instead of waiting endlessly, I have already dumped all the money into reviving my hi-fi setup. LOL. Other than that, all my hope lies on your future review of the Z9 in conjunction with the Z 800mm f/6.3 PF. That is the lens I want provided the Z9's AF and tracking will be improved by then. Have you seen the price of the RF 800mm f/5.6 and the the RF 1200mm f/8? That is serious Big White money, US$17K for the 800mm and US$20K for the 1200mm. Not for me. Having said that, I still need an upgrade which is why the Nikon Z 800mm f/6.3 PF is my only hope. If not, I will settle for the A1 + FE 200-600mm as and when the new A1 comes out as I refuse to pay US$6.5K for a flagship camera with a crappy low res 1 million dot LCD screen.
It's Actually Gitzo 4543 and not 4534 as u mentioned in the video. I'm using the same tripod. It's much lighter than my older Gitzo 5542 and sturdy enough to take 600F4
When getting a lite tripod how do you determine your maximum carrying weight of the tripod you need? Would it be total lens, camera and gimbal weight and then add a little extra to be safe for the tripod to support? Thanks 😊
Thank you! This person is doing a very good job impersonating you! 🥺 Almost sent money. He had left a reply comment here saying I won and to respond on a text messaging app.
@@jamesseward9263 they're everywhere. If unsure click on the username, you will see they have no followers. They made over 10 accounts, faster than I can block them
Hey Jan. Check out Kingjoy. Every bit as good as the Gitzo. After hating the last five tripods I’ve owned, I’m absolutely loving this one. So sturdy and real quality. 👍👍
Hallo Jan, ich habe mir gerade das Leofoto Ranger LS-323CStativ und dazu einen Flexshooter Pro Kopf geholt. Das ganze ist deutlich leichter als mein Gitzo Systematic mit Gitzo Kimball und auch noch deutlich handlicher! Wichtig waren mir die wenigen Auszüge, um ein stabiles Stativ zu haben. Der Kopf lässt sich fast wie ein Kimball verwenden, hat aber ein Limit beim Winkel nach oben und unten. Aber wenn man da ran kommt, wird das Bild eh nicht sonderlich schön. Zur Not kann man auch den äußeren Kugelkopf lösen und neu ausrichten. Grüße aus Berlin, Holger
Re tripods. Birders in Singapore and South Korea tend to use video tripods and heads. The most popular being the Sachler FSB6 head, 75 or 100mm bowl mount, on a suitably sturdy set of bowl mount cf legs, eg from Sachter or Manfrotto (appear to be made in the same place). I also use this set up, as well as a 2nd setup up witb a smaller lighter video head, 75mm bowl, on a set of smaller Sachler cf legs for walking. Once you have used quality video tripod heads and legs, you will never go back. Stills market tripods and heads seem so cheap and flimsy in comparison - which they are. Fyi, Sachler is the industry standard in video head smoothness. Extremely low sticktion, multiadjustable drag and preload. And yet, you can pay nearly as much for Gitzo which is plainly junk in comparison, and videographers wont use them. If you ever shoot video, even a tiny bit, you should have a proper video head. Super smooth and shake free panning @ 1000mm
I would definitely like a better video solution, but I can't carry all the weight all the time. I will check them out again. I will probably need a small set up and something more video focused
If you need a print 19x30 or larger or do large cropping, then yes mp matter. If you're printer smaller than 19x30 or just posting to social media....then no. Mp do not matter that much.
@@KevinNordstrom I get it. The problem with wildlife photography is that you don't really know what kind of shot you are going to come back with. I am wondering if the sensor improvements and the post processing improvements are closing the gap.
Ich kann noch vom Gitzo GT4533LS berichten, nicht exakt das gewünschte Modell, aber nah dran. Schwer ist es immernoch immens, vor allem mit Kopf dran. Praktisch ist die „Schnellwechselplatte“ für den Stativkopf - ein dicker Videokopf zum Seawatching und ein kleinerer Fluid-kopf fürs Festlnd Birding (wird nicht für Kamera, sondern fürn dickes Spektiv gebraucht).Gelenke müssten nach 5 Jahren mal nachgefettet werden und die Beine fahren auch etwas hakelig aus dem vielen Sand drin. Stabilität aber top! Vor allem wenn man unten noch einen Rucksack dranhängt, dann bewegt sich selbst beim Seawatching im Sturm nicht mehr viel. Insgesamt ein treuer Begleiter, den ich aber trotzdem oft noch etwas zu schwer und vom Packmaß etwas zu groß finde. In 20 Jahren gibts ne etwas kleinere Version davon, wenn das durchgenudelt ist.
@@jan_wegener es gibt auch die Philosophie: lieber alle 5 Jahre nen neues leichtes stativ kaufen (weil es durch die Zuladung ja ganz schön leidet), als 10 Jahre ein schweres zu schleppen.
I’m pretty new, so maybe I’m missing something. I’m shooting with the R5, 100-500 zoom. Sometimes with the 1.4tc. I’ve just recently programmed a button to toggle to crop mode. I get that reduces the number of pixels, but I am getting some good results. So, wouldn’t the R7 basically just be the R5 in cropped mode? Also any thoughts on using cropped in camera vs cropped in post?
I’ve tried both cropping in post and shooting in crop mode. In an earlier video Jan’s good friend Glen Bartley talks of the benefits of not using the crop mode in camera but doing it later in post and a lot of that is that it gives you more flexibility to place the subject in the fame exactly where you want it. If you have already used the crop mode in camera and then try to further recompose you are further cropping the file and reducing the size of it. From having tried both, I agree with Glen. As for the R5 v Possible R7, the cropped sensor of the latter is going to make you images appear a lot closer in camera than on a full frame body.You would be able to get a slightly larger ‘magnification’ of the image from the cropped sensor R7 (x1.6) than the R5 with the x1.4 extender on a lens. When using your 100-500 on the r7 You would also be able to have a minimum F7.1 as opposed to F10 therefore gaining a stop of light, and potentially better focus operation. And you would be able to use the whole range of the 100-500 not just the 300-500 that you get when you put on an extender.
Concerning tripods: I doubt it that I own anything you'd be terribly interested in. But the multiple award-winning bird photographer Arthur Morris changed some years ago from Gitzo to Induro, mostly due to service problems with Gitzo. And he claimed Induro was better. Now, a word of caution: I'm not sure how trustworthy the man is. He was an "Explorer of Light" with Canon for many years, until they chose to strip him of that title. Then he sold all his Canon gear and bought Nikon instead. He claimed that he wasn't angry with Canon, oh no - Nikon was simply much better! Until he migrated to Sony a few years (or was it only months?) later! I'm not sure what cameras he uses these days. So take his gear recommendations with a grain of salt, but still Induro might be worth looking at?
I agree R7 will hopefully be APS-C, but I don't agree about high MP. I hope it will be a mirrorless 7D Mark II, in effect. As such, it should be no more than 24MP. Even that would be a significant increase from the 20MP 7DII, just as the full frame 24MP R3 has effectively superseded the 20MP 1DX Mark III. Yes, Canon should produce a higher MP APS-C R-series camera... perhaps 32.5MP like the 90D and M6 Mark II. But that should be another model, distinct from the R7. R7 needs to have advanced AF similar to R3, R5, R6... BSI sensor like R3... Smaller body format like R5/R6 with optional grip (ideally the same BG-R10 used by R5/R6). But I sure was hoping to see R7 sooner... Not have to wait another year for it. Guess I'll have to keep shooting with my 7DIIs!
Okay, when you're playing with 2 R5's and 2 R3's .. but leave the poor Z9 in the trunk .. then you're silently admitting to still be a Canon-fanboy 😛 And I'll admit to be a bird-nerd waiting for the animal part of the reviews yet to come ;-) With latest batch of R7 rumors, I'm getting the impression it might come more expensive than the R6, unless they leave out IBIS and the low light quality would suck for a BSI sensor. If they'd also leave out eye-AF then the R7 would be the new joke in town .. I am not going to suggest you my tripod, it's extremely light, but not sturdy enough for the big whites I cannot afford ..
Never denied I was one, at least a little bit haha. The R3 is a very nice body ergonomically. The rumours on the R7 don't seem real to me, it feels way too good, unless it will be very expensive, as you say. It seemed more like a "Specs I want list"
@@jan_wegener exactly. But the next rumor about the R7 to be joined by some RF-S lenses is stuff I don't want at all ;-) As far as I recall, you didn't repeat naming yourself a canon-fanboy since starting to test the Sony A1 .. Actually last month in a local nature reserve, I started talking to a birder to help me identify a Flussregenpfeifer which I shot a bit earlier. He was nicely equipped with an A1 and 600/4. After also talking about gear and editing, I wanted to suggest him your youtube channel. But he already knew you as "the one who can explain things extremely well, and who is honest and objective regarding the different brands"
I’d have to disagree with you on the customization of the r3. It’s dreadful. Little different than the r5. Canon’s like of customization is unbelievably poor compared to especially Sony. Nikon is pretty good, too. Every time I try Canon, I end up disgusted with the terrible lack of micro customization.
i want to put a comment to elevate the algorithm . done. I really enjoy using the R3 but clearly i can crop in more with the R5....it seems to me the R3 very closely resolves in image sharpness to my 30mpixel R....might have to look more into it. I carry both. (in the garage, R3, R5, R6, A7iv (sold my A1), A6400, Z6ii - R6 and A6400 is for when i enter the bad guys are allowed to carry guns while I go to jail if i had a gun neighborhood to jack the camera gear...now they come to you with the gun in your face to take the $7,000.00US carbon bikes in Democrat lead cities; so just living carefully. Aus. looks really beautiful and civilized.
![🎤 ไปกันต่อออ! จับฉลากร้องเพลง x P’ #XXSIVK [EP.2] (1/2) เพลงของใครจึ้งสุดน้าา 💓🎤 #MXFRUIT](http://i.ytimg.com/vi/mLI_K0sAS4o/mqdefault.jpg)
A while back I found out about FLM tripods from Canada. I bought the FLM CP34-L4 and I really like it. This model expands extra high. Weight is 4 lb 10 oz or so. Much cheaper than Gitzo and RRS.
I have a setup from Pro Media Gear with their Katana GK Jr gimbal head and their TR344L legs and I absolutely love it. I’ve owned RRS TVC-34L legs and I’d take the PMG ones over those any day. They’re lighter, cheaper, extend higher, and are shorter when fully collapsed. I’ve never owned Gitzo legs but I have a Gitzo monopod and I think the build quality of the Pro Media Gear stuff is noticeably better. Their gimbal also is like half the weight of a Wimberley but is still rated for 50lbs (I use mine with a 600 IS II and R3/R5 and I’ve never had any issues with stability). Highly recommend them!
I agree. I have the same tripod and it is fantastic.
I have a ProMediaGear TR424L Pro-Stix Carbon-Fiber Tripod with Top Plate (Black, 77")
I use it with a Wimberley WH-200 it’s a great Tripod in my opinion. However I rarely use it since my main setup is a ProMediaGear TR34M 34 Series Carbon Fiber Monopod I use it with a Wimberley mono-gimbal & carry it in a dual harness military flagpole holder. Every bit as good as a tripod but with added mobility & cheaper. I use this with my 600mm f/4 II prime, extenders, R5 with battery grip. Can hold & hike with this setup for hours. It’s like hand holding your EF 600 II prime rock steady with no fatigue. I do use my tripod for backyard shots, long exposure, focus stacking etc but that’s kind of rare.
Thanks for sharing. I did end up buying a new tripod :)
BTW you should look up Whistling Wings latest video on setting up the R5. I think the AF button settings will surprise you.
Leofoto offers an excellent line of tripods in various configurations. I like them a great deal. I have two - one medium and one quite heavy. They are very well made.
Agreed -- I've had excellent luck with Leofoto.
Agreed, I had a Leofoto on that trip, it’s a beauty
Seems to be the most popular brand here, too bad they're so low on stock where I look (BH Photo)
@@jan_wegener For my heavy set up I settled on the LM 364C. My lighter weight set up is LS-284CEX. The light one is perhaps better described as light/medium. It is pretty darn stout, about as light as I want to go. There are many different configurations available so you can pretty much find what you are looking for as far as weight and features etc. I can't say enough about how happy I am with these tripods.
Do you know that Leofoto is a brand copying every really right stuff product?
I know Innorel is a more "budget" option, but I've had the Innorel rt90c, and it's been beat to shit in all weather conditions along the Great Lakes and it keeps it holds up to the bigger competition and asking for more. I know there's better out there for way more money, but For a sub $300 usd tripod, it's a tank.
I've been using this one for 3 years now.. very happy so far
The wind will blow me over but this tripod will remain standing 🤣
Would like to see a quality test between canon rf 800 5.6 and new Nikon 800 6.3. 800 smaller than 600 sounds great but Is such a price difference justified? Hope this is your new “big white lens”🤞
(Sorry. I'm poor at English😅)
Thank you for the great videos👍
6:59
I have strongly insisted since July 2020 at the latest that Canon wouldn't release APS-C camera body and lens in RF system for not cinema camera, but still camera. The reasons I presume are shown below.
(1)
Customers and users who want a budget price camera are mainly classified as two groups.
The persons belong to the one group could not concern about specifications and could be satisfied with camera kit like EF-M system. Several years later, they almost wouldn't buy a next interchangeable lens camera. The other words, provide of EF-M and EF-S systems are worth keeping unless net deficit.
While the persons belong to the other group couldn't have enough budget, they are interested in photography and/or videography and they want to improve their skill and equipments. The other words, most important thing for them is not image sensor size, but simply price. Their ideal camera is a budget price one using "high speed present generation" FF sensor. I'm calling this camera "R9" which is similar in design to R6 with EVF and flip screen in spite of intensive cost reduction. One of the biggest missions on "R9" is a bridge the gap in videography between M50/M50ii and mid range like R6. While Canon well understood Sony APS-C series like A6*** occupy this gap several years ago, they didn't take measures during long years. On viewpoint of videography, Canon is building their ecosystem, including "R9", R6, R5, R3, R5C, C70, C300iii, C500ii and so on.
(2)
Regarding APS-C still camera, the rest meaning of existence is crop effect. However, it's extremely difficult the balance between price and high performance; high speed burst shooting, durability etc. I'd like to remind, especially, photographers who need high speed burst shooting that the rolling shutter effect using equivalent technology on image sensor is directly proportional to not image sensor size, but numbers of pixels. The sales period of 7D2 which price was roughly $2000 was about four years; from 2014 to 2018. If the price of 7D2 successor would be almost as same as R6, the demand of this successor should be very small. Therefore, I think "R9" should have high priority to 7D2 successor.
I'm interested in "Kokomo" VR platform. If it would be successful a few years later, many people should have headsets for "Kokomo". Therefore, it could increase demand for "EOS VR System" contents shot by professional videographers and filmmakers. Of course, "R5C and RF5.2mm F2.8 L Dual Fisheye" is the best equipments for "EOS VR System".
For your information: Canon has introduced key parts as shown below.
--- introducing Dual Pixel technology ---
*S35 image sensor for cinema cameras: C300 (01/2012), C100 (11/2012) -- introducing Dual Pixel technology in 2012 and DPAF thanks to update in 11/2013
*APS-C image sensor for still cameras: 70D (08/2013) -- introducing DPAF
--- low speed previous generation ---
*APS-C image sensor for still cameras: 80D (03/2016) and 11 models (11/2016 - 11/2020)
*FF image sensor for still cameras: 5D4 (08/2016), R (09/2018)
*FF image sensor for still cameras: 6D2 (06/2017), RP (02/2019)
*Image processor for still cameras: DIGIC 8 (03/2018) -- maybe introduce GPGPU for computing deconvolution
*FF image sensor for cinema cameras: C700FF (07/2018), C500ii (12/2019)
--- high speed present generation ---
*High-speed and intelligent communication system between the lens and the camera body: RF mount (09/2018) -- maybe USB3.1 (12pin, 5Gbps)
*APS-C image sensor for still cameras: 90D/M6ii (08/2019) -- maybe delay about 2 years
*Image processor for cinema cameras: DIGIC DV 7 (12/2019)
*FF image sensor for still cameras: 1DX3 (02/2020), R6 (08/2020)
*Image processor for still cameras (and cinema cameras!!): DIGIC X (02/2020)
*S35 image sensor for cinema cameras: C300iii (06/2020), C70 (11/2020) -- introducing Dual Gain Output (DGO)
*FF image sensor for still cameras: R5 (07/2020), R5C (03/2022) -- 2 line readout same time
--- high speed next generation ---
*FF image sensor for still cameras: R3 (11/2021)
RRS TVC 33 is fabulous. Mine is 7 years old and still going strong, despite using it frequently in salt water.. Agree that it is very frustrating that everything is out of stock for months.
Yes, I would buy one right now, but not gonna wait months if others have stock
Really happy with my Sirui Tripod and the Sirui PH 20 Gimbal head.
I think nowadays the only tripod option is Leofoto. I can't see any difference between them and Gitzo, and they're quite a bit less expensive. I'd go with the LM-324CL. It's like the Gitzo 3543xls
This!
Thanks for sharing!
Especially the new leofoto LQ series. impressive quality
100% disagree. Pro Media Gear TR423L or RRS tripods are much better. I have the tallest 42mm diameter PMG TR42ML and matching tripod. Yes I’ve now spent about $3,300 on a monopod and tripod, but they are worth every penny. Especially when you’re using a $10,000+ lens like I am. The Pro Media Gear tripods are rated to 125 pounds capacity. Which is double or triple what Leophoto offers. Night and day difference between the $550 Leophoto and the $1,400 RRS or PMG tripods. My daughter whose 11 years old and 90lbs can easily hang from my tripod apex, both feet off the ground. I have images to prove it!
@@patricksmith2553 I suppose if maximum stability and strength is what you're after then that pro media gear one is good, but with it being almost 2lbs heavier, and double the price of the leofoto I listed, I find it hard to recommend the PMG. Most supertelephotos are quite light these days. Gone are the days of 13lbs 600mm lenses and Gitzo 5 series tripods.
I do agree that the build quality of the RRS and PMG is top class.
Tripod: Give Sirui a try - a lightweight carbon fiber or aluminum W-2004 tripod with detachable monopod. I have an older model so cannot say much about the current ones. Of course, super stable will require a heavier brand or model...
Not a fan. I've owned one and imho it did not compare well to the Leofoto stuff.
@@robgerety Thanks, if I get the chance will try one out. Generally speaking though apart from the ballhead I don't thing the stiffness (as in carbon fiber) doesn't matter that much. There are going to be vibrations from various sources in the environment. If we want true stability then a good old wood tripod is the choice, which is of course not all that portable.
Glad I jumped on an R6 when I did, I’d been waiting for years to upgrade, the R7 is becoming a mythical beast……………
Yes! Sometimes it could be a very long wait!
Hanging out for your R3 Review from a Video perspective Jan. I have a Z9 in my hands but still debating the R3 as I know it is a brilliant camera for video. Great low light and focus, weight advantage etc.
soon! I have used it for video 99% of the time thus far and it does very well
@@jan_wegener Great, I have a Z9 but would love to know how you went as I need to decide if I keep the z9. I do 95% video
The Gitzo 4543LS is my to go tripod.
quite light, sturdy enough for the big whites on Gimbals etc.
I use it now for roughly 2 years, perfect!
Thanks for sharing
Hello Jan. I use the Rollei Rock Solid Gamma Mark II Carbon and I love it. Very stable and light. In addition, the center column can be removed so that photographs can be taken almost at ground level. There is now a Mark III version of it. 😊😊
Regards from Switzerland and take care
Michel 😊
Thanks for sharing!
FLM or Promedia gear, both are well built and reliable with options to suit the gear you use.
I have had a Manfrotto 055Pro tripod for many years and recently bought their BeFree GT XPRO for a travel tripod. However, neither of these take spikes and I decided I needed a much sturdier tripod with spikes. Some of the brands like Gitzo (owned by Manfrotto) are just ridiculously over priced and Manfrotto has also become expensive. After much research, I discovered Artcise which only seems to be available in Australia from Amazon. I ended up with an Arcise AS95C carbon fibre tripod with an Artcise MB52 ball head. It is a beast of a tripod, but not extremely heavy. They have quite a range, so smaller are available. It is beautifully made and I can highly recommend. Great tripod at a reasonable price.
I purchased the Artcise AS95 back in late Dec 21, very steady and so well built and not too heavy.
Wow, 2 R3’s, you’re one lucky guy hahaha
Only one will stay, tho :)
@@NeungView why do you care?Your funny,why are you funny?
At this point, I guess your ideal camera will be the R1 (if rumors are true). About the tripod, for the last 10 years I use the Sirui M-3205 (Height: 14.5 - 160 cm, weight: 1.6 kg. Maximum load: 15 kg) and I had no problem putting it into the snow, the water, on the rocks and it holds good my gear
I am guessing the same! Thanks for the tip
Well, Jan, I don't think the Gitzo System 5 is the problem but the lack of assistants to carry stuff for you :) . Systematic 5 has simply been the best in the past 50 years to me. It's the kind of thing you can earmark in your will to posterity. Recent brands are in a way rip-offs. As we shoot digital, we now have incredible sensitivity (as in ISO) and very large dynamic range (15 EV) and this means that motion blur easily becomes visible as a feeling of sub-optimal sharpness (when we pixel peep). Your very long lenses may need a tripod because hand-holding is impractical, but as you want maximum sharpness in your birds, you still want to minimize relying on the camera's VR or whatever it is called.
The question then is what kind of vibration a tripod can dampen or resist. The main one is caused by wind. The question is if you ever shoot birds in a (very) windy - i.e. open - habitat. And then I'm not sure if (very) windy weather makes for good bird photography. If you go out in such weather and the birds are out too, then in that (very) windy environment vibration will play a role. And here the heaviest model of the best brand may not do the best job. If you bring a lot of gear to location, like you do, then hanging your camera bag off the center of the tripod keeps a light tripod stable easily, but that bag and strap may increase sensitivity to wind and thin legs more easily vibrate than thicker or heavier ones.
Some years ago, I saw this YT video testing sensitivity to vibration of different tripod brand/models and my favorite brand was not the best at that.
I briefly searched YT for tripod reviews mentioning vibration to see if I could find it back but the hit list is too long. One genre where absence of vibration may be most important is astro-photography. They would go so far as to place vibration suppression pads under the tripod legs. Might be an idea to also look there for advice.
Anyhow, there is no quick answer. I have a very light Manfrotto (MF) carbon traveler but my longest lens is 180mm only and light. With a MF quick release I needed a hex tool to occasionally tighten things and because the magnesium ball head is excellent, I replaced the MF QR plate by an Arca-compatible top plate that can pan. A 40 year old aluminum Slik Master still does a great job in video but the screw-clamp-bushes need occasional removal and cleaning and then I put some PTFE grease in that, again. This one has a very hard and strong grade of aluminum alloy. Gitzo, Sirui, Benro, Leofoto may all be good. To me, Gitzo's qualities plus their accessories make them sort of unbeatable. Photographers always have the wrong, (1) light modifier, (2) camera bag, (3) tripod. The reality is that you need a few of each for different jobs or use cases.
Thanks for the great insight, yes wind is always a big problem. I did buy a tripod that looked interesting, so I will report back with how I like it
Have a look at Vanguard tripods.
Really Right Stuff tripod hands down!!
I would but I have not seen stock in over a year
When you do that R3 comparison video? I am very curious how it works, expecial animal autofocus. Also how easy 6K RAW is edit?
I have your ProSets and your Master Class and have learned a lot from them. I used to use a RRS TVC-24L tripod but found it to be a little on the heavy side for long hikes. I now use the Leofoto LS-284CEX which only weighs 2.93 lbs. and has a built-in 15 degree leveling base. It has a maximum height of 58 inches and a minimum length of 21 inches. I am also using a Manfrotto MVH500AH fluid head which works almost as well as a gimbal but weighs a lot less. I really enjoy all of your videos and look forward to seeing many more.
Great to hear! Sounds like a great set up!
Jan, which camera-the R3 or the Z9-feels better in your hand with the built-in vertical grip? I know it’s subjective but I’m interested in your thoughts anyway.
R3 is the best camera body I ever held in terms of feel and fucntionality
Great job as always. I have been contemplating whether to make more videos or just let other do it. Love your content love listening to someone that actually knows how to shoot. Thanks again for all that you do and watching you more and more makes me want to go out and do more videos.
You should do more! Glad you are enjoying my content
@@jan_wegener I will as you know there are more spectators than ones thst really want to be photographers......everyone has a professional opinion. On something they have never owned or even touched 😀.
Upgraded my old Gitzo to an RRS Versa, which is lighter and stiffer, but the big weight and bulk loss was switching from my Wimberley head to a Flexshooter Pro ball head, giving me great freedom of motion without the worry of the lens and camera flopping over. There are lots of TH-cam videos on the Flexshooter. Yeah, I had to wait two months for my tripod, though.
I have seen a flexshooter before, but found it kinda confusing haha
The biggest weight savings that I found was to get a carbon fiber gimbal. You’d be surprised the difference it makes. Not just in weight, but balance as well. I got one from Benro, but there are many
Thanks for the tip, never really looked into them. Is yours the GH5C or something like that? Do you like it?
There seem to be a bunch of cheap ones and a few pricy ones
I would definitely look into Leofoto. Just got LM-324CL. It’s as extra long tripod which might come handy in some situations photographing wildlife. The best part about it is that for ordinary fairly leveled terrain I need to only use 3 out of 4 section which makes it more stable. Btw I’m 6’2” so it should be plant for most of the people. Also they got plenty great accessories so I’m planning to get few including their gimbal head with leveling base.
That one looks great, is just a bit long for me when packed away
Gread Video Jan, I have a Sirui Tripod, look, I love this tripod
Cool 👍
I am working with the Gitzo GT4542LS for a few years now and am very happy with it(D850 and Z9 with a 600mm FL). As you said a bit lighter than the 5series but sturdy enough for the rig.
Nice!
I'm still waiting for the verdict on whether R3 or R5 :-) I can't decide. R3 is amazing, AF is the best, but big. R5 has super resolution :-)
You and me both!
Hi Jan
I love using the ifootage gazelle tc7 tripod because of the versatility of the legs especially when I am sitting on logs or on the ground you can put your legs in more comfortable positions + it's not to heavy to carry on long hikes when I am doing my own youtube videos . So it might be an option for you .
Cheers Derek
Thanks for sharing
Hi Jan ...Looking forward to your thoughts on the R3
I am into my first 3 months with the R3 using the adapter to shoot my EF glass and converter 1.4 .
So far... Im loving it.
I only shoot stills and at 30 frames a second raw you don't miss a lot especial flight and action.
24 mega px is more than adequate and the pixel quality is gorgeous.
Hope you have a great time with your R3s :-))
So far so good with my R3, great body for sure. And 30 fps is great!
Look at the tripod Leofoto Ranger LS-255CEX
I have read a lot of good things about the Sony A1 and I am tempted to get one but switching from photo to video seems to be a problem for me. I am also waiting for the R1 as my main camera and the R5 will be my secondary. I think you bought the RF800mm F/5.6. Drool.....
Check out the FLM CP 34 series’s a good compromise in weight vs stability Imho. Weight less than 2 kg while having a higher load capacity than the gitzo
I enjoy all your videos thank you. Kudos cameras is a little known Aussie store that sells FLM and Leophoto tripods and heads
Thanks for the info!
Glad I watched to end to finish with a bit of Sony news, the orignal 24-70mm is a older Sony e lens and was quite a large heavy lens, so I went with the 24-105mm f4 as image quality was similar, but with the improved version being lighter and smaller it sounds like it would be a worth while lens for me now
Yes, the size and weight look great
Another enjoyable and informative video! I wonder if the R6 has that same feature of using the C3 settings when you push the video button during stills shooting? I'm gonna have to check that out.
It doesn't. It just shoots in Auto mode, which is a shame. It actually doesn't even have video custom functions
@@jan_wegener This is one of the reasons I moved to an R5 recently.
@@jan_wegener cripple hammer
Jan: Re: new tripod, I can support your notion of the RRS 24L which has replaced my prior Gitzo and larger RRS 34L. I strongly suggest you avoid the RRS 14 which I find too unstable with 600 + 2X shooting. RRS has a very nice fluid gimbal FH-02 which is my preference for mixed stills/video shooting but a bit heavy for travel, where I typically use Flexshooter Pro. I share your frustration with their frequent stocking issues - not sure if this is the usual supply chain issue or if they are in some form of hibernation now... Good luck with new tripod and keep up your great YT work with Glenn B and solo!
Thanks. I would have bought one, but went elsewhere that had stock!
I have now printed a sticker saying "R7" in Canon font and placed it on my M6ii. I am all set for the next few years.
Nice upgrade!
Hi there Jan, I noticed the heavy metal Gimbal on your tripod... IMO I'd keep the excellent Gitzo and put your monies towards a lighter carbon gimbal option.. Could be less of an expense.🙃AU
Which one? I have never found one that was better than the Wimberley
I looked at some Promedia Gear ones, but the reviews all said they move a bit when tightening, which I could not stand
@@jan_wegener Have you considered the FlexShooter Pro head? Double ball head that some are using in place of gimbal. Weighs about 1.5lbs.
@@jan_wegener I can't say, As I'm using a similar set-up to you - a heavy metal gimbal on the largest carbon Benro TMA48C XL - & I find gimbal to be the heaviest component to carry..
So it seems that we both will appreciate the feed-back from others that may have solved the problem. Cheerz
Check out the Three legged thing Tommy or Mike
Never another Gitzo. Love my Induro.
Another comment mentions and I agree, you might want to give a Gitzo Series 3 Systematic a try. I've been using one for 20 years and have never felt the need for anything bigger and heavier, even with 8 lb. and 10 lb. prime lenses. In fact, my stable of Gitzo Series 3 tripods has now grown to three... One fitted full time with a gimbal, a second fitted with a heavy duty ballhead and gimbal adapter, and a third extra tall version fitted with a ballhead and a column that also can be reversed for very low angle close up work.
Perhaps you can borrow a Series 3 and see if it's sufficient for your purposes. With newer cameras and lenses that are more compact, weigh less and have more capable image stabilization, a Series 3 might be all you need.
I'm disappointed but not surprised to hear the R7 is likely to be delayed... The R1 too, though that's more out of curiosity since I'm very unlikely to ever buy one.
Yes, have been looking at them and ended up buying another brand. Will see how I go :)
I’ve had the RF 600mm f/4 for about 5 months and I love it!!
Nice
Hi Jan - I bought the Feisol CT3372 carbon fibre legs and Jobu Design gimbal head… very pleased with them, and a significant saving over Gitzo/Wimberley . Great video, as always 😊
Thanks for the info!
I am very happy with my Gitzo GT4543LS with a FLM ball head (FLM CB 48 FTR II and RRS clamp) but the Gitzo GT4553S seems to be a good compact alternative. However, FLM is producing very good tripods today and when I had to replace my tripod I will certainly look for a FLM 34 or 38 series (with lengths up to 190 cm and load capacity of 50 kg at 2,35 kg).
Thanks for the tip
@@jan_wegener you should contact FLM, they are very nice and have a good service, to test their tripod.
Well ... take a look at Leofoto LM-404CL ... in my opinion a tripod beast! Combine it with Leofoto YB-100MP and your levelling is made easy ... which I have found really helpful in many situations. And then a Leofoto PG-1 Gimbal on top ... and you are ready ... and definitely steady!!!
it looks pretty cool, just also pretty heavy
@@jan_wegener In my opinion ... not too heavy. At least, the benefits for me really wins the equation. Happy every time I use it 🤗
Thanks.....
Great video. Hope you tested the R3 eye control feature. I have been using Gitzo 3 series for over 10 years for my big Canon prime. It is sturdy and lasts forever. RRS is also great, but its price is a bit higher than Gitzo.
Not yet, but I will
I am really excited to learn something about the birds itself in a next Video, as kind of Birders content ;)
Hi Jan Wegener! What is your personal preference: Canon R3 or Nikon Z9?
I don't think I can answer that at this stage. It kinda boils down to how I feel about the 24mpix.
@@jan_wegener I am thinking of buying the Z9 but I have to order it without actually holding it in my hand first. So, my question is this: is the Z9 too heavy with a lens attached to carry around and take pictures for a day?
Check out ProMedia Gear, the 42 series is superb but might be overkill. The 34 series is the perfect balance of weight and stiffness for me - they go from 50 to 70 inches tall, either 3 or 4 sections. Build quality is of the same standard as RRS. They also have a very nice Gimbal if you want to take some weight out.
And as a Sony A1 shooter, I will agree that the ergonomics of the Canon R3 are probably my favorite of any camera to date. I just couldn't wrap my head around 24MP but what a stunning camera on every other aspect.
And i forgot... I got the pro-sets a couple weeks ago. I don't know what magic juice you built into those but they are by far the most useable presets I have ever used for wildlife photography. Everything else is just overdone and designed with fashion and life-style in mind - yours work amazingly well and THANK_YOU for giving them names that make sense and are actually related to what they do ("Oops I underexposed" has saved a few more shots last week than I care to admit as i forgot to get out of manual ISO on a burst...). I know a lot of folks are jaded with useless overcooked presets but this is by far my best investment this year.
Great to hear the PROSETS have been very helpful. That's exactly what we created them for
Thanks for the tip, I did get a new tripod :)
Nice mate, the big Red made the cut, he was such a dude!
Yes he was!
Nice one buddy!
Thanks!
Great video. Looking forward to your trip video.
Thanks mate!
I have K&F tripods. Love them.
Hey Jan; Great video as always;
What part of Qld did you go; I have another trip to Charlotte plains later this year; Absolutely amazing place, & cant wait to get back there!
We did go past there, but very little activity, very wet
Hi, Jan, check out the Robus tripods and the Leofoto tripods. I have one of each-the Robus for daily work and the Leofoto for travel. Love your work!
Thank you, I will
Try, or look at the Novoflex tripods. Really great and -sorry- also expensive.
Just as well no camera is coming this year. Instead of waiting endlessly, I have already dumped all the money into reviving my hi-fi setup. LOL.
Other than that, all my hope lies on your future review of the Z9 in conjunction with the Z 800mm f/6.3 PF. That is the lens I want provided the Z9's AF and tracking will be improved by then. Have you seen the price of the RF 800mm f/5.6 and the the RF 1200mm f/8? That is serious Big White money, US$17K for the 800mm and US$20K for the 1200mm. Not for me. Having said that, I still need an upgrade which is why the Nikon Z 800mm f/6.3 PF is my only hope. If not, I will settle for the A1 + FE 200-600mm as and when the new A1 comes out as I refuse to pay US$6.5K for a flagship camera with a crappy low res 1 million dot LCD screen.
Yes, will be interesting to see what that combo will be like!
Having owned both the R3 and R5. Personal I would stick with the R5
I can see how one would come to that conclusion for sure. I will definitely keep both
It's Actually Gitzo 4543 and not 4534 as u mentioned in the video. I'm using the same tripod. It's much lighter than my older Gitzo 5542 and sturdy enough to take 600F4
Thanks! Yes, the numbers are a bit confusing!
I start to like you videos more and more..
nice
When getting a lite tripod how do you determine your maximum carrying weight of the tripod you need? Would it be total lens, camera and gimbal weight and then add a little extra to be safe for the tripod to support? Thanks 😊
I suppose, most tripods have much higher ratings than one would ever need anyways
Awesome video Jan! The R3 looks very good imo..
One remark: The best tripod for your B-roll is me 🤣.
But where are you? :D
@@jan_wegener Still at the manufacturer because you haven't made an order 😂🥸
Also I think since you have the 600mm F4 I think it would only make sense to get the RF 1200mm as your next lenses. Am I right? 😁
It's an interesting theory, we will know for sure on Wednesday :D
Hi Jan, I was told I won a camera here and just wondering if it really you before sending money?? Please reply quickly if you can! Thanks
@@jamesseward9263 it’s a scam of course. Don’t send anything!
Thank you! This person is doing a very good job impersonating you! 🥺 Almost sent money. He had left a reply comment here saying I won and to respond on a text messaging app.
@@jamesseward9263 they're everywhere. If unsure click on the username, you will see they have no followers. They made over 10 accounts, faster than I can block them
Hey Jan. Check out Kingjoy. Every bit as good as the Gitzo. After hating the last five tripods I’ve owned, I’m absolutely loving this one. So sturdy and real quality. 👍👍
Thanks for the tip!
Hallo Jan, ich habe mir gerade das Leofoto Ranger LS-323CStativ und dazu einen Flexshooter Pro Kopf geholt. Das ganze ist deutlich leichter als mein Gitzo Systematic mit Gitzo Kimball und auch noch deutlich handlicher! Wichtig waren mir die wenigen Auszüge, um ein stabiles Stativ zu haben. Der Kopf lässt sich fast wie ein Kimball verwenden, hat aber ein Limit beim Winkel nach oben und unten. Aber wenn man da ran kommt, wird das Bild eh nicht sonderlich schön. Zur Not kann man auch den äußeren Kugelkopf lösen und neu ausrichten.
Grüße aus Berlin, Holger
Klingt interessant! Guck ich mir mal an
what are the names of the gitzos that you intend to buy another from
GT2545T a small one for my Broll and second video tripod
Go with leofoto 323c carbon fibre tripod.
I guess you should check out leofoto tripods..
Thanks for the updates. So no R7 for me this year. 😞
possibly not
Re tripods. Birders in Singapore and South Korea tend to use video tripods and heads. The most popular being the Sachler FSB6 head, 75 or 100mm bowl mount, on a suitably sturdy set of bowl mount cf legs, eg from Sachter or Manfrotto (appear to be made in the same place).
I also use this set up, as well as a 2nd setup up witb a smaller lighter video head, 75mm bowl, on a set of smaller Sachler cf legs for walking.
Once you have used quality video tripod heads and legs, you will never go back. Stills market tripods and heads seem so cheap and flimsy in comparison - which they are.
Fyi, Sachler is the industry standard in video head smoothness. Extremely low sticktion, multiadjustable drag and preload. And yet, you can pay nearly as much for Gitzo which is plainly junk in comparison, and videographers wont use them.
If you ever shoot video, even a tiny bit, you should have a proper video head. Super smooth and shake free panning @ 1000mm
I would definitely like a better video solution, but I can't carry all the weight all the time. I will check them out again. I will probably need a small set up and something more video focused
Could you try the R3 with your new RF 600mm f4? Would be very interested how the autofocus performs
I will
@@trevorhoward1285 already subbed to his channel and watched it. however, he does not compare it to the older ef is ii version of the lens.
@@jan_wegener my man
Curious on the 24 mpx comparison. Does modern post processing software reduce the need for 45-50 mpx?
If you need a print 19x30 or larger or do large cropping, then yes mp matter. If you're printer smaller than 19x30 or just posting to social media....then no. Mp do not matter that much.
@@KevinNordstrom I get it. The problem with wildlife photography is that you don't really know what kind of shot you are going to come back with. I am wondering if the sensor improvements and the post processing improvements are closing the gap.
I am still trying to figure that out myself :D I will share when I have a conclusion
Ich kann noch vom Gitzo GT4533LS berichten, nicht exakt das gewünschte Modell, aber nah dran. Schwer ist es immernoch immens, vor allem mit Kopf dran. Praktisch ist die „Schnellwechselplatte“ für den Stativkopf - ein dicker Videokopf zum Seawatching und ein kleinerer Fluid-kopf fürs Festlnd Birding (wird nicht für Kamera, sondern fürn dickes Spektiv gebraucht).Gelenke müssten nach 5 Jahren mal nachgefettet werden und die Beine fahren auch etwas hakelig aus dem vielen Sand drin. Stabilität aber top! Vor allem wenn man unten noch einen Rucksack dranhängt, dann bewegt sich selbst beim Seawatching im Sturm nicht mehr viel. Insgesamt ein treuer Begleiter, den ich aber trotzdem oft noch etwas zu schwer und vom Packmaß etwas zu groß finde. In 20 Jahren gibts ne etwas kleinere Version davon, wenn das durchgenudelt ist.
Ja, habe auch schon ueberlegt ob fast 2kg immer noch zu viel sind
@@jan_wegener es gibt auch die Philosophie: lieber alle 5 Jahre nen neues leichtes stativ kaufen (weil es durch die Zuladung ja ganz schön leidet), als 10 Jahre ein schweres zu schleppen.
🙏🏾
I’m pretty new, so maybe I’m missing something. I’m shooting with the R5, 100-500 zoom. Sometimes with the 1.4tc. I’ve just recently programmed a button to toggle to crop mode. I get that reduces the number of pixels, but I am getting some good results. So, wouldn’t the R7 basically just be the R5 in cropped mode? Also any thoughts on using cropped in camera vs cropped in post?
R5 in crop mode is about 17mpx. They are speculating that an R7 will be 32 mpx. So there is a difference in pixel density
An R7 would likely have around 30mpix, so you would have much more room to crop than on the R5, where crop mode is about 17mpix
I’ve tried both cropping in post and shooting in crop mode. In an earlier video Jan’s good friend Glen Bartley talks of the benefits of not using the crop mode in camera but doing it later in post and a lot of that is that it gives you more flexibility to place the subject in the fame exactly where you want it. If you have already used the crop mode in camera and then try to further recompose you are further cropping the file and reducing the size of it. From having tried both, I agree with Glen.
As for the R5 v Possible R7, the cropped sensor of the latter is going to make you images appear a lot closer in camera than on a full frame body.You would be able to get a slightly larger ‘magnification’ of the image from the cropped sensor R7 (x1.6) than the R5 with the x1.4 extender on a lens. When using your 100-500 on the r7 You would also be able to have a minimum F7.1 as opposed to F10 therefore gaining a stop of light, and potentially better focus operation. And you would be able to use the whole range of the 100-500 not just the 300-500 that you get when you put on an extender.
The two things I hate looking for in regards to cameras are tripods and bags.
same!
3legged thing
www.3leggedthing.com/row/tripod-ranges/legends.html
Leofoto:
leofoto.de/
Thanks. I wish Leo had stock
You should try the XCD 3 Way Swivel Head Tripod for only $30 at JB HiFi if you want something lighter 😝
haha, sounds like exactly what I need :D
Ricky Goodyear and Dean Rule ??????
Concerning tripods: I doubt it that I own anything you'd be terribly interested in. But the multiple award-winning bird photographer Arthur Morris changed some years ago from Gitzo to Induro, mostly due to service problems with Gitzo. And he claimed Induro was better.
Now, a word of caution: I'm not sure how trustworthy the man is. He was an "Explorer of Light" with Canon for many years, until they chose to strip him of that title. Then he sold all his Canon gear and bought Nikon instead. He claimed that he wasn't angry with Canon, oh no - Nikon was simply much better! Until he migrated to Sony a few years (or was it only months?) later! I'm not sure what cameras he uses these days.
So take his gear recommendations with a grain of salt, but still Induro might be worth looking at?
Yes, he is an interesting character!
R3 has serious problem wrt animal eye tracking , where as bird and people is amazing .., r3 has one heating issue post 30min recording
It does very well with Kangaroos
How does someone make money with wildlife photography? I have to assume if you’re buying two R3’s you have to make money doing it.
There are many different income streams & lots of trial and error
Hello Jan
I have Promediagear they just pip really right stuff excellent tripod check them out!!
I will check it out
@@jan_wegener not cheap but the best!
Thanks for your nice video. Hopefully R7 coming with high MP plus APSC. 😜
I agree R7 will hopefully be APS-C, but I don't agree about high MP. I hope it will be a mirrorless 7D Mark II, in effect. As such, it should be no more than 24MP. Even that would be a significant increase from the 20MP 7DII, just as the full frame 24MP R3 has effectively superseded the 20MP 1DX Mark III.
Yes, Canon should produce a higher MP APS-C R-series camera... perhaps 32.5MP like the 90D and M6 Mark II. But that should be another model, distinct from the R7.
R7 needs to have advanced AF similar to R3, R5, R6... BSI sensor like R3... Smaller body format like R5/R6 with optional grip (ideally the same BG-R10 used by R5/R6).
But I sure was hoping to see R7 sooner... Not have to wait another year for it. Guess I'll have to keep shooting with my 7DIIs!
Okay, when you're playing with 2 R5's and 2 R3's .. but leave the poor Z9 in the trunk .. then you're silently admitting to still be a Canon-fanboy 😛
And I'll admit to be a bird-nerd waiting for the animal part of the reviews yet to come ;-)
With latest batch of R7 rumors, I'm getting the impression it might come more expensive than the R6, unless they leave out IBIS and the low light quality would suck for a BSI sensor. If they'd also leave out eye-AF then the R7 would be the new joke in town ..
I am not going to suggest you my tripod, it's extremely light, but not sturdy enough for the big whites I cannot afford ..
Never denied I was one, at least a little bit haha. The R3 is a very nice body ergonomically.
The rumours on the R7 don't seem real to me, it feels way too good, unless it will be very expensive, as you say.
It seemed more like a "Specs I want list"
@@jan_wegener exactly. But the next rumor about the R7 to be joined by some RF-S lenses is stuff I don't want at all ;-)
As far as I recall, you didn't repeat naming yourself a canon-fanboy since starting to test the Sony A1 ..
Actually last month in a local nature reserve, I started talking to a birder to help me identify a Flussregenpfeifer which I shot a bit earlier. He was nicely equipped with an A1 and 600/4. After also talking about gear and editing, I wanted to suggest him your youtube channel. But he already knew you as "the one who can explain things extremely well, and who is honest and objective regarding the different brands"
We're going to follow you on Twitter if you have an account.
@jan_wegener_
I’d have to disagree with you on the customization of the r3. It’s dreadful. Little different than the r5. Canon’s like of customization is unbelievably poor compared to especially Sony. Nikon is pretty good, too. Every time I try Canon, I end up disgusted with the terrible lack of micro customization.
What do you want to change you can't?
???? I have both the R3 and Z9 and customization of the R3 is substantially better then the Z9.
i want to put a comment to elevate the algorithm . done. I really enjoy using the R3 but clearly i can crop in more with the R5....it seems to me the R3 very closely resolves in image sharpness to my 30mpixel R....might have to look more into it. I carry both. (in the garage, R3, R5, R6, A7iv (sold my A1), A6400, Z6ii - R6 and A6400 is for when i enter the bad guys are allowed to carry guns while I go to jail if i had a gun neighborhood to jack the camera gear...now they come to you with the gun in your face to take the $7,000.00US carbon bikes in Democrat lead cities; so just living carefully. Aus. looks really beautiful and civilized.
Thanks for sharing! And the support
Check out Jobu Designs, exceptional build quality and the price is reasonable. The Algonquin is a steal for the money. Handles my 600 RF F4 No problem
Thanks mate