Everyone claims Mach 2. It is standard practice. True top speed is usually a secret number. But not a single fighter with an acrylic "front window" will ever pass Mach 2.1. It will simply melt. When you use long range missiles the top speed must be confidently above Mach 1, more like Mach 1.4-1.5, and your tactics must be spot on even in a contested environment.
Sweden had "F-16XL" in the 50´s fighter J35 Draken. The Gripen is much better though. Big does not always mean more creative or better. But I yield, quantity is a quality in itself.
@@dogone7262 You missed the point F16-XL was an experimental aircraft, much similar in performance to the Grippen than the original F-16. The comment was not intended towards size. Also comparing the Drakken to the F-16 is pointless, different eras different spec aircrafts (multi role vs interceptor), etc.
It has 1,2 m2 RCS so its not the best 4 gen figter jet but its not bad, best things of Grippen E on my mind are its radar and its cheep as milk to fly and it can do all things what 4 gen figter jet is require to do
Thailand air force finally chosen Jas 39 gripen E.
The gripen E is a very underrate jet
Awesome 👍🏻
Thanks 🤗
JAS 39 Gripen the Sukhoi killer 💥
The best agile ever built ❤❤
when 2 engine version built ?
Countries need to cancel F35 orders znd get these, nimble,capable and actually flight capable for more than 2 days in a row.
🇮🇩🇮🇩🇮🇩🇮🇩🇮🇩💪👍
🇮🇩🇮🇩🇮🇩🇮🇩🇮🇩🇮🇩💪👍
Why are you showing model c lol
If only it could go mach 2...
Everyone claims Mach 2. It is standard practice. True top speed is usually a secret number. But not a single fighter with an acrylic "front window" will ever pass Mach 2.1. It will simply melt. When you use long range missiles the top speed must be confidently above Mach 1, more like Mach 1.4-1.5, and your tactics must be spot on even in a contested environment.
it does
It goes 2.1 last I checked....😊
Det är ju precis vad den gör
sounds more like a selling pitch than an objective analisis
th-cam.com/video/dzWRL7459CA/w-d-xo.htmlsi=9INJdx-vsay3EIyT
Basically, they've created a smaller F-16 XL
Sweden had "F-16XL" in the 50´s fighter J35 Draken. The Gripen is much better though.
Big does not always mean more creative or better. But I yield, quantity is a quality in itself.
@@dogone7262 You missed the point F16-XL was an experimental aircraft, much similar in performance to the Grippen than the original F-16. The comment was not intended towards size. Also comparing the Drakken to the F-16 is pointless, different eras different spec aircrafts (multi role vs interceptor), etc.
Gripen EF We must prove ourselves in Asia by using Thai technology.
👍🇹🇭🙏
The flag of the Brazil ??????????
Jamaica
Twin engine
Gripen would be much better in MULTIROLE
Hört talas om vikt/effekt, svänger en Bugatti bättre än en Lotus 😉
It does not look particularly stealthy?
It has 1,2 m2 RCS so its not the best 4 gen figter jet but its not bad, best things of Grippen E on my mind are its radar and its cheep as milk to fly and it can do all things what 4 gen figter jet is require to do
@@FinTomTom Good points all, thanks for sharing.
@@FinTomTom The Gripen is hard to see too, with your eyes. But I would challenge the RCS you mentioned. Ask other air forces..
@@dogone7262 Yes its hard to find the correct rcs, some sources say its 1,2 m2 and other say its 0,5 m2 but 1,2 is not bad for non stealth jet
th-cam.com/video/dzWRL7459CA/w-d-xo.htmlsi=9INJdx-vsay3EIyT