Post-truth - Steve Fuller

แชร์
ฝัง
  • เผยแพร่เมื่อ 21 ก.ย. 2024
  • Serious Science - serious-science...

ความคิดเห็น • 25

  • @GeorgiosMichalopoulos
    @GeorgiosMichalopoulos 3 ปีที่แล้ว +3

    This is fascinating, but this is not to my mind how the word "post-truth" is used. But yes, if you grant him his definition of the word this is great.

  • @MrLinuxNewbie
    @MrLinuxNewbie 6 ปีที่แล้ว +6

    Steve Fuller of it.

  • @khaimgulkovich3368
    @khaimgulkovich3368 4 ปีที่แล้ว +3

    We need both-the scientific truth and a collective self-deception. However, they are insufficient-we need the infinite supreme goal too.

  • @sirzenjavi
    @sirzenjavi 5 หลายเดือนก่อน

    great

  • @JurijFedorov
    @JurijFedorov 4 ปีที่แล้ว +2

    I don't think it's a huge problem that they invite a progressive into the studio. As long as they also invite people from the other side and make sure it's 50/50.

  • @lebulle4544
    @lebulle4544 6 ปีที่แล้ว +7

    That was interesting, but for some reason he doesn't mention that Democrats are playwrights too

    • @Skunkhunt_42
      @Skunkhunt_42 ปีที่แล้ว

      Don't trip over theater, they all on same team

  • @JonSebastianF
    @JonSebastianF 3 ปีที่แล้ว

    _"mkaaay"_

  • @youtubeus3rname
    @youtubeus3rname 6 ปีที่แล้ว +2

    01:15
    Why are you bringing THAT much politics into this?

    • @everburningblue
      @everburningblue 6 ปีที่แล้ว +4

      Andrew K. Because politics is important?

    • @doublenegation7870
      @doublenegation7870 6 ปีที่แล้ว

      I also cringed when he admitted he was a clinton supporter. He would've lost all intellectual credibility for me if he wasn't such a prolific scholar.

    • @charleswashington5263
      @charleswashington5263 4 ปีที่แล้ว

      I guess it is because of the time he made the video ?

    • @ProNarble
      @ProNarble 3 ปีที่แล้ว

      @@doublenegation7870 you are the institute of intellectual credibilty ? I think your comment shows otherwise...

    • @hikari120
      @hikari120 3 ปีที่แล้ว

      ​@@ProNarble argumentum ab auctoritate?