But the full bench of the Supreme Court disagreed, ruling the ICC "retains jurisdiction over any and all acts committed by government actors until March 17, 2019" -- overlapping the first three years of Duterte's presidency and drug war. "Withdrawal... does not affect the liabilities of individuals charged before the International Criminal Court for acts committed up to this date," the 15 judges said in the ruling, which dismissed a petition by six current and former senators challenging Duterte's decision to pull out of the ICC.
But the full bench of the Supreme Court disagreed, ruling the ICC "retains jurisdiction over any and all acts committed by government actors until March 17, 2019" -- overlapping the first three years of Duterte's presidency and drug war. "Withdrawal... does not affect the liabilities of individuals charged before the International Criminal Court for acts committed up to this date," the 15 judges said in the ruling, which dismissed a petition by six current and former senators challenging Duterte's decision to pull out of the ICC.
Kahit po may rulling Sila Basta Wala Sila jurisdictions Dito tapos mag pumilit Sila na dapat makipag ugnayan ung gobyerno, Hindi pwede dahil malalaglag ung principles of justice and due process nung bansang pinapasok nila.
DDSfans pre-2016: *_"Lagot kayong mga adik sa DDS!! Go tatay Digong"_* _(hinahabol sina Digong dahil maraming nangamatay na small fish at kalaban na pulitiko)_ DDSfans: *_"Wala namang DDS."_*
@@mrmoo2330 moving on when justice is served 💪⚖️ Just because your car insurance ends today doesnt mean they're not liable for the continuing medicall expenses until the person you accidentaly ran over yesterday is back on his or her feet, right? It could be 4 surgeries down the road but the insurance company is liable for the expenses since the incident happend while under contract. THINK.
Atty, the courts in the Philippines 🇵🇭 are working and the so-called crimes were inside the Philippines, so the suspects should be trialed in the Philippines?
Rome statute the country agreed to when we were a member of ICC: Article 127 2. GENEVA CONVENTIONS OF 1949, ADDITIONAL PROTOCOLS AND THEIR COMMENTARIES TREATIES AND STATES PARTIES HISTORICAL TREATIES AND DOCUMENTS Back to: Rome Statute of the International Criminal Court, 17 July 1998 Legal instrument text is available in these languages English Article 127 - Withdrawal Withdrawal 2. A State shall not be discharged, by reason of its withdrawal, from the obligations arising from this Statute while it was a Party to the Statute, including any financial obligations which may have accrued. Its withdrawal shall not affect any cooperation with the Court in connection with criminal investigations and proceedings in relation to which the withdrawing State had a duty to cooperate and which were commenced prior to the date on which the withdrawal became effective, nor shall it prejudice in any way the continued consideration of any matter which was already under consideration by the Court prior to the date on which the withdrawal became effective. So it's either the country honors what it signed before or not. The Supreme Court also ruled on this in March 2021.
@@alextamayo601Nag-aral ng International Law di man lang yan namention ni Atty. Magaling siyang abugado pero di lahat ng bagay sa Batas alam na niya. Baka di rin niya alam kung Anong mangyayari kapag hinadlangan ng Marcos Admin ang pagiimbestiga sa mga akusado.
@@mayethgarcia4441 may Alam sa batas si atty.abogado nga e ,kaya lang minsan hindi ako agree sa mga opinion nya 😅 DDS na obsessed kay Tulfo si atty.Libayan 😄
I did your homework for you. I'll just put it here: Jurisdiction: The Philippines, State party to the Rome Statute since 1 November 2011, deposited a written notification of withdrawal from the Statute on 17 March 2018. While the Philippines' withdrawal from the Statute took effect on 17 March 2019, the Court retains jurisdiction with respect to alleged crimes that occurred on the territory of the Philippines while it was a State Party, from 1 November 2011 up to and including 16 March 2019. While the relevant crimes appear to have continued after this date, Pre-Trial Chamber I noted that alleged crimes identified in the Article 15(3) Request were limited to those during the period when the Philippines was a State Party to the Statute and restricted the authorised investigation to that period.
Philippines' top court rules ICC has jurisdiction Manila (AFP) - Issued on: 21/07/2021 - 14:10 But the full bench of the Supreme Court disagreed, ruling the ICC "retains jurisdiction over any and all acts committed by government actors until March 17, 2019" -- overlapping the first three years of Duterte's presidency and drug war. "Withdrawal... does not affect the liabilities of individuals charged before the International Criminal Court for acts committed up to this date," the 15 judges said in the ruling, which dismissed a petition by six current and former senators challenging Duterte's decision to pull out of the ICC.
Darating ang oras nila para arestuhin oansamantala hayaan muna sila ma stress hindi maka tulog hindi makakain pati buong pamilya nila .. hehehe need 😅😅😅
@@hercc6155stress talaga? Baka naman na stress na ang kalaban nila kc palapit na election kailangan nila manalo kc malakas sa survey ang mga Duterte.. or ikaw kamu stress na din😅
Paano yong coconut farmers pinatay na buhay sobrang mura..10k nalangshare ko kay pbbm..paano ang mga workers? ..kay tatay Digong share ko sa coconut farm 32 k share ko yong workers 12 k..pinatay na sa gurom?
Ang Galing ninyo talaga Attorney Libayan mag Explain
It's hard to believe that you don't know about the Supreme court ruling favouring ICC. I mean......
May ruling yung SC about the jurisdiction of ICC
Si libayan makaduterte yan kaya wala kang aasahan na content laban sa duterte dyan
Nagtataka nga ako erp bakit hindi ito alam ni atty
Hahaha.. nagtaka taka kayo kubg bakit di alam ni atty 😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂
bkit mag ka iba sila ng stance ni atty. Claire? 🤔 tama ba ako sa pag ka intindi ko sa paliwanag nila about sa jurisdiction?
Anti kasi si claire. Si libayan nman nsa gitna.
Gogogo ICC
Go na mga bangag
Atty mismo SC po yata ang may sabi na may jurisdiction ang icc sa pinas. At ang pag uusapan po yata ay yun mga nangyari before 2019. Salamat po
So It means na ang justice system ng Pilipinas is not working at sinuko na ang sovereignty ng Pilipinas sa mga dayuhan by doing that? Toinks
But the full bench of the Supreme Court disagreed, ruling the ICC "retains jurisdiction over any and all acts committed by government actors until March 17, 2019" -- overlapping the first three years of Duterte's presidency and drug war.
"Withdrawal... does not affect the liabilities of individuals charged before the International Criminal Court for acts committed up to this date," the 15 judges said in the ruling, which dismissed a petition by six current and former senators challenging Duterte's decision to pull out of the ICC.
Kabatasnatin watching from Paris France 🇫🇷
Frm.pulilan bulacan atty.71 yrs.old
Dami ko matutunan dito
Watching from Lebanon🇱🇧
Ang argumento kasi ni thrilling ay yung pagiging member ng pinas sa ICC hanggang 2019.
How about interpol? May blue notice na daw sila, why this isnt been tackled?
Nabasa ko din yong ruling ng Supreme Court about ICC jurisdiction Atty! "PHILIPPINES' top court rules ICC has jurisdiction on 21 July 2021
But the full bench of the Supreme Court disagreed, ruling the ICC "retains jurisdiction over any and all acts committed by government actors until March 17, 2019" -- overlapping the first three years of Duterte's presidency and drug war.
"Withdrawal... does not affect the liabilities of individuals charged before the International Criminal Court for acts committed up to this date," the 15 judges said in the ruling, which dismissed a petition by six current and former senators challenging Duterte's decision to pull out of the ICC.
❤❤
❤
Nasagot na yan ng Supreme Court
according to supreme court sakop pa rin yan
Hello sa lahat kabatas
Good Afternoon sir Atty Libayan, p'wede niyo po bang gawan ng reaksyon tungkol kay Mr Beast Allegations? trending po siya ngayon, maraming salamat
Pwede ba mag right to remain silent..at sa korte nlang sasagot?
Parejo po ba ang local PH courts vs ICC when it comes to jurisdiction?
Pero db Meron ng rulling ung sc allowed ung ICC sa ginagawa nila dahil na file ung case before Tayo umalis?
Kahit po may rulling Sila Basta Wala Sila jurisdictions Dito tapos mag pumilit Sila na dapat makipag ugnayan ung gobyerno, Hindi pwede dahil malalaglag ung principles of justice and due process nung bansang pinapasok nila.
DDSfans pre-2016: *_"Lagot kayong mga adik sa DDS!! Go tatay Digong"_*
_(hinahabol sina Digong dahil maraming nangamatay na small fish at kalaban na pulitiko)_
DDSfans: *_"Wala namang DDS."_*
Mukhang di pa din pa din maka-move on ah. 😂
@@mrmoo2330Dutae mo hirap na nga makalakad Ang lakas pang maghamon ng barilan sa ICC🤣🤣🤣
@@mrmoo2330 moving on when justice is served 💪⚖️
Just because your car insurance ends today doesnt mean they're not liable for the continuing medicall expenses until the person you accidentaly ran over yesterday is back on his or her feet, right? It could be 4 surgeries down the road but the insurance company is liable for the expenses since the incident happend while under contract. THINK.
@@ritzbrecio Puro aligasyon wala naman pruweba. Si Trillanes pa source wtf?? Yung analogy mo eh di applicable dito boy. 😂
Engot lang maniniwala kay trililing
Bakit yang ICC masyadong invested s pinas pero ung mga human rights abuses s ibang bansa hindi matutukan gaya na lang
s Yemen..
Atty, the courts in the Philippines 🇵🇭 are working and the so-called crimes were inside the Philippines, so the suspects should be trialed in the Philippines?
Rome statute the country agreed to when we were a member of ICC: Article 127 2. GENEVA CONVENTIONS OF 1949,
ADDITIONAL PROTOCOLS AND THEIR COMMENTARIES
TREATIES AND STATES PARTIES
HISTORICAL TREATIES AND DOCUMENTS
Back to: Rome Statute of the International Criminal Court, 17 July 1998
Legal instrument text is available in these languages
English
Article 127 - Withdrawal
Withdrawal
2. A State shall not be discharged, by reason of its withdrawal, from the obligations arising from this Statute while it was a Party to the Statute, including any financial obligations which may have accrued. Its withdrawal shall not affect any cooperation with the Court in connection with criminal investigations and proceedings in relation to which the withdrawing State had a duty to cooperate and which were commenced prior to the date on which the withdrawal became effective, nor shall it prejudice in any way the continued consideration of any matter which was already under consideration by the Court prior to the date on which the withdrawal became effective.
So it's either the country honors what it signed before or not. The Supreme Court also ruled on this in March 2021.
Atty .
Libayan BASA!
@@alextamayo601Nag-aral ng International Law di man lang yan namention ni Atty. Magaling siyang abugado pero di lahat ng bagay sa Batas alam na niya. Baka di rin niya alam kung Anong mangyayari kapag hinadlangan ng Marcos Admin ang pagiimbestiga sa mga akusado.
@@mayethgarcia4441 may Alam sa batas si atty.abogado nga e ,kaya lang minsan hindi ako agree sa mga opinion nya 😅 DDS na obsessed kay Tulfo si atty.Libayan 😄
isang pirma lang yan balik tayo agad sa icc
I did your homework for you. I'll just put it here:
Jurisdiction:
The Philippines, State party to the Rome Statute since 1 November 2011, deposited a written notification of withdrawal from the Statute on 17 March 2018. While the Philippines' withdrawal from the Statute took effect on 17 March 2019, the Court retains jurisdiction with respect to alleged crimes that occurred on the territory of the Philippines while it was a State Party, from 1 November 2011 up to and including 16 March 2019. While the relevant crimes appear to have continued after this date, Pre-Trial Chamber I noted that alleged crimes identified in the Article 15(3) Request were limited to those during the period when the Philippines was a State Party to the Statute and restricted the authorised investigation to that period.
Bakit parang iba din po ang sabii ni Atty Claire??
Bias n Ayun sa Marcos Admin di nyo pa halata.
mag ka iba sila ng stance ni atty. Claire o nakulangan sa reseearch si atty. Libayan mag pa liwanag? 🤔
😂😂😂😂 tapos na malligayang araw ng mga dutarte!!!!
Atty ask ko lng pwde po ba sla ma KULONG sa ICC regarding sa mga Kaso nla po EJK
Philippines' top court rules ICC has jurisdiction
Manila (AFP) -
Issued on: 21/07/2021 - 14:10
But the full bench of the Supreme Court disagreed, ruling the ICC "retains jurisdiction over any and all acts committed by government actors until March 17, 2019" -- overlapping the first three years of Duterte's presidency and drug war.
"Withdrawal... does not affect the liabilities of individuals charged before the International Criminal Court for acts committed up to this date," the 15 judges said in the ruling, which dismissed a petition by six current and former senators challenging Duterte's decision to pull out of the ICC.
Atty. Tanong lng po, kailangan po ba muna matapos ang kaso sa korte bago mag file ng Perjury?
Salamat
Ahahah may bagong speaker ang ICC si trililing siya ung nagpliwanag lahat e hindi ung icc
2019 hindi ay nag take effect na hindi na tayo myembro ng ICC
ICC's no jurisdictions but the Interpol will be the one to arrest the alleged suspect or convicted person same as Teves issues
Hulihan na Bato Delarosa, Bong Go, Sara Duterte, Digong,albayalde, caramat,
Darating ang oras nila para arestuhin oansamantala hayaan muna sila ma stress hindi maka tulog hindi makakain pati buong pamilya nila .. hehehe need 😅😅😅
Naku ang babaw ng pag iisip niyo😅, Hindi kayo nakikinig kay Atty. Libayan.. Puro kayo lutang🤣..
@@hercc6155stress talaga? Baka naman na stress na ang kalaban nila kc palapit na election kailangan nila manalo kc malakas sa survey ang mga Duterte.. or ikaw kamu stress na din😅
@@pauljosephrosil7870 isa kapang bulag. 😅 Paulpaul
@@curlordivergent9558sya bulag ikw tanga 😂
Gd morning 😊
🙏🙏🙏👍👍👍🇵🇭🇵🇭🇵🇭👋👋👋
Sorry Atty. Libayan pero mas malinaw Yung paliwanag ni Atty
Claire sa topic n yan
May ruling na yung SC dito nga e
Hahaha malinaw.. malinaw kase anti duterte yun 😂😂😂😂😂.. si atty libayan wala pinapanigan kung mali mali kung tama tama.
@@wasakikimagtamby1948 May ruling na yung Supreme Court G.R. No. 158088
@@wasakikimagtamby1948 Hindi alam ni Atty. Libayan.
@@wasakikimagtamby1948 May ruling na yung Supreme court.
Ohayo Atty❤! team replay
Atty san tatakbo kayong Senator . mas maganda talaga na mga Atty ang mga senator natin kasi related sa Law at alam ang laws at rights
Not necessary na lawyer peri atleast sana may pinag aralan..mga pinoy kasi basta sikat at mayaman iboboto nila..
@@senbm4095 that's the sad reality. kaya ako hindi ako mag vote this election na.
Paano yong coconut farmers pinatay na buhay sobrang mura..10k nalangshare ko kay pbbm..paano ang mga workers? ..kay tatay Digong share ko sa coconut farm 32 k share ko yong workers 12 k..pinatay na sa gurom?
Hindi ko maintindihan baka pwedeng irewrite
😂
si castro at si satur convic na pero hindi padin nakulong he he he 😂😂😂😂
ICC? Talagang grabe tong admin na to. Walang jurisdiction ang ICC sa pinas di naman member
The Philippine courts are working 🤔: so only the Philippine courts can prosecute?
di kasi natutulog si trililing ng mahimbing e😂
Matalino pa tong c atty sablayan kesa sa supreme court
Panu mo nasabi? Anu argumento mo?
Hawakan mo nga sa Tenga
Nood po kayo ki atty. Claire.
@@Chard49-p1f ako both napapanood ko
Mas clear magpaliwanang si atty claire..😂
Why answer there interview who are they I will not wasting my time