To try everything Brilliant has to offer-free-for a full 30 days, visit brilliant.org/FloatHeadPhysics . You’ll also get 20% off an annual premium subscription.
5:59 YOU ARE WRONG !!!!!! Kinetic energy should not increase due to the confinement of electron it increases due to more frequency Most probably what you trying to say is the uncertainty in momentum and Kinetic energy increases due to decrease in uncertainty in electron position 😊
This is the topic that is being handled in the most non-intuitive ways possible in schools. But, you are the great one to explore this in detail. Hats off to your hard work for this video. How many of you agree?
But how exactly should it be explained? Highschool students are just learning basic trigonometry and complex numbers, you can't teach them spherical harmonics even in this hand-wavy way except to more talented students that are preparing for physics/chemistry olympiad. It's always a trade off between accuracy and immediate practical utility. Unfortunately, the time is simply better spent on teaching other concepts that are mathematically much more straightforward. Also, I think the capability of average highschool student to understand geometric arguments in 3D is severely overestimated.
@@Ennar Iam not telling that high school students needs to be inculcated with all the necessary stuffs required for the rigorous treatment of quantum mechanics. Ofcourse, understanding orbitals and their successors are the stepping stones of the quantum mechanics that needs to be dealt in such a way that it doesn't involve rote learning of orbitals without even knowing about the underlying principle for the formation in an intuitive way is a kind of absurd thing to do
Well, I specifically asked you how. "Things could be better" is a nice thought, but not very useful. I'd say "here's a cheat-sheet that we are going to use" is still much better than "well, kids, I guess you are learning about bonds in college since we don't have intuitive understanding of orbitals yet". If you insisted on this approach that you need to understand how results are derived in order to use them properly, nobody would get a PhD before they are 50, so there's that.
Thanks!!!!! I am a student of class 11th in India and I was confused about it since day 1!!! Phewww..... What a relief now! I have tears in my eyes now!!!!!! I appreciate the beauty of physics more now❤
Hi i am too from India And now I am in 12th . I tried my best in 11th to understand it But nowhere I can get the intuition So i just cram it fir exam and all And i didn't like it. But now I can feel it too. Tears too in my eyes
Brilliant. Brilliant. Brilliant. No, I'm not talking about the software. I'm talking about the video and the author of the video. This is THE BEST video I have seen so far this year. I thought I would never be able to understand electron orbitals intuitively in my lifetime, UNTIL NOW. Thanks so much for making this video.
In terms of pedagogy on such cutting-edge subjects, Mahesh, you're exceptional! You single-handedly replace years of incomprehensible blah, blah, blah with the obvious. You have a real gift (in addition to intelligence). Thank you for your work.
As a PhD student in physics, it is truly a pleasure to see your intuition in visualizing complex matters. Thank you very much! I hope you continue to explore atomic and solid-state problems. It would be very interesting to hear your perspective on the many-body problems!
Hi @FloatHeadPhysics! I am a PhD Physics candidate and have been following your channel for a while now. Well, all your videos are highly appreciable for the animations, presentation, references and intuition but this one, to me personally, stands out brilliantly. Having the experience to read, imagine and teach physics at various levels, this is one of the toughest areas to teach and make the students realise the importance of this model. It is hard at the school level and also at the UG/PG level when the students are equipped with the Schrodinger equation. This is the most detailed and yet clear demonstration I have seen on this topic. Kudos bro! Keep growing! ❤
yes u finally covered this topic!! I spent a whole week tying to grasp this concept and still felt like smth was missing, it was ur explanation! thanks a lot 😭
I am genuinely stunned. Always knew that orbital is the region where the probability of finding an electron is maximum, but I never learnt it this way! You’re great Mahesh!
I like your intuition, maybe for the d orbitals you could propose anothe rule for angular nodes: because they are symmetrical, the must intersect the center or the nucleus. With this rule you can construct nodes with planes that cross the center, and maybe if you consider as valid a node that has 0 curvature You can count the cone! So a valid solution with this rule is to add 2 planar or angular nodes as one that bisects the cloud and another one that is a cone perpendicular to that first node, then you can explain more or less intuitively the dz² orbital, and has the nice property that is also one with ml=0 because you can rotate it and doesnt change. The dx²-y² is a little bit more complicated but if you draw the 4 other d orbitals, you can see that something is missing in that direction and you can construct it with the corresponding nodes. I think the octet rule is a simple way to start to predict stuff for elements of the A group, but I always had the feeling that it isnt very good for understanding, that is not a way to sy it isnt important because when you really understand the inner structure of these type of rules, you keep using octet 😅. We must remember that the octet rule was proposed as an empirical way to describe things that were observed of chemistry. Nice work on this, reminds me of how I was constructing my own way to remember the things, the radial and planar nodes were truly the crucial step for me in this path, then, thinking in orbitals is one of my favourite ways of understanding chemical reactions and mechanisms, but I dont know if you will get there, to valence bond theory and molecular orbitals.
I am a senior Pediatricians and a physics lover and a big fan of your way of teaching...you are really a great teacher....your hard work and intuitive thinking make me understand what I couldn't understand with my school learning..,.. hats off to your pure effort.❤
i remember my chemstry teacher just told us to learn the probablity vs distance graphs but it never sat rght with me i am so glad i found this stuff like this is so exicting
I recall having to memorize these orbitals in my collage physics 101 course. Neither the instructor or the text presented this in any other manner than just "except this as fact." How hard would it have been to take 20 minutes to explain this the way you just did? That B- could have been an A+ with just a little effort from the educational system.
If you are in college taking physics all of this should have been taught to you. Even in advanced classes in high school you teach potential well and the standing wave examples - and definitely in university - it's literally the 101.
What is this wave that is confined? Is it like a field that the proton has? And does that destructively interfere with the electrons wave? Or is this just an analogy to visualize it?
My man how can you explain anything with soooooooooo ease and yet it detailed has hell , thankyou sooo much , i would also like you to explain gibbs free energy
Thank you, Mahesh, for taking something that I enjoy studying and helping me to understand it with the passion it deserves. This video and the standing waves analogy put orbitals into perspective for me in a new and fundamental way. Thank you so very much.
Up until you started talking about planar nodes, everything made sense to me on an intuitive level. You did a great job explaining how the radial nodes arise from standing wave behavior, but I don't understand what a planar node means in that context.
Amazing explanation. Never thought we can understand the orbitals by taking a standing wave and visualizing in this way. My heartful appreciations to you. Really great depiction.
We're lucky that the problem factors into [radial] x [angular] parts. The angular part really is _just_ standing waves on spherical surface, about which much has been written for application in physics, chemistry, engineering, computer animation, helio-seismology, etc etc... just google "Spherical Harmonics". The left over radial part is also just a standing wave on a weird coordinate: it's radial, so it has a radius squared weighting (from 4pi r^2), and then it sits in a 1/r potential..it's not as simple as "a wave on a string", but the problem is solved and the solutions are called "Laguerre polynomials".
This is explained in NCERT chemistry pretty well. Since I've taught my student quantum mechanical model really well,it was kinda easier for me to get it. Beautifully explained !!
Hey Mahesh. Amazing video, as always. But... There's one thing I'd really like to see explained, intuitively. And you even mentioned it in this video. Could you do the Pauli's Exclusion Principle?
Please teach us differential equations, it is the basic tool to understand physics,.... please please please, you are the best physics teacher in the world. I wish I had a teacher like you in my school days
@@Mahesh_ShenoyThanku sir You actually make me feel the topic I was very much freaked about this I tried hard but no intuition I get from anywhere Thanku sir that you make video on this. Actually now teras in my eyes .
Excellent video! As far as spin is concerned, I believe it comes from the Dirac equation, that extends the Schrödinger equation to include special relativity, so to speak. I’m not familiar with the details, but it has to do with “spinors”, abstract mathematical objects used in the Dirac equation. And as you explained, it also has to do with the Pauli exclusion principle. I look forward to watch the next video!
At first glance I thought it shouldn't be that hard to understand the different d orbitals but I was wrong and ended up spending quite a while writing things out. The second, third, and fourth d orbitals at 24:00 are each from planar nodes along two of the three xy, yz, xz planes, while the first is the second orbital rotated by 45 degrees. It seems that all orbitals comprising two perpendicular planes through the origin need to be built from at least these four basis orbitals. To see this, note that any such orbital can be described by two surface normals whose dot product is zero. If we write out the pairs of surface normals (v1, v2) for the second to fourth orbitals, we will find that linear combinations of the three (v1, v2) do not span R3xR3 - an additional orbital such as the first is needed to do so. The 5th orbital looks completely different from the rest and seems to be built from cones extending out from the origin rather than planes. I guess linear combinations of the 5th orbital with the others can rotate the cones in any direction.
By the way, this was a really nice way to understand the shape of spherical harmonics. In college, all I remember was being given the harmonics as solutions of Schrodinger's and shown what they look like. I never really gave much thought to why they had to look the way they did, but your analogy with standing waves made me look at them in a new light. Kudos!
Okay The whole video was so well done but i have a doubt.From the analogy of the standing wave in a string we can have a node in between nucleus to infinity ( a symmetric radial node) but how can we come up with a planer node because this doesn't fit with the analogy. So was the analogy just to realise the no. of nodes or is there some way to also explain this.
Fascinating! You explain it so well. And in fact, although I do watch science videos relatively often, I've never seen an explanation of their shapes before. Well done! One question I do still have, though, is why "arbitrarily close to infinity" is so nearby, meaning why the drop-off is so quick, rather than taking up a lot more of the universe. I wonder if it has to do with the speed of light and these particles not being able to get so far away in a certain time. But then again, I've also heard that quantum particles don't move on a completely understandable path, and a particle could theoretically show up anywhere, even if the chances are less than the age of the universe, so that point is still somewhat puzzling...
As a neet aspirant Atomic Structure is one of my most dreaded chapter and it shows up in both physics and chemistry which just makes it 10x worse but now I am looking forward to studying it, can't wait for the other videos on this. Thankyou so much sir Always grateful for your hardwork.
15:21 this is really really good representation, yeah. I like brilliant also, I just adore to learn with cool visualization tools, maybe because I'm really really bad at drawing.
Just remember that - regardless of quantum numbers and how many s,p,d, or f orbitals are occupied or empty in any shell - the distribution of electron density about an isolated atom is always spherical. Regardless of which way the orbitals point. They aren't real, they're just a way - the way - of evenly partitioning eletron density into 1, 3, 5, 7 etc directions. That's all.
18:00 Can you please explain, why did we need to slice that at the first, who told us to do so, and why can't we do this in the ground state?? --this doesn't match with the wavelength theory , does it? Btw Thank you Thank you Thank you Thank you Thank you Thank you Thank you Thank you Thank you Thank you Thank you Thank you Thank you Thank you Thank you Thank you Thank you Thank you Thank you Thank you Thank you Thank you Thank you Thank you Thank you Thank you Thank you Thank you Thank you Thank you Thank you Thank you Thank you Thank you Really Thank you man, I was confused so much about this thing, I am crying now, you can read my name and understand why
Can you please make a video on how to effectively Read physics textbooks to understand at intuitive level like you. I revived my love for physics bcz of you
To try everything Brilliant has to offer-free-for a full 30 days, visit brilliant.org/FloatHeadPhysics . You’ll also get 20% off an annual premium subscription.
Finished video
Where will you learn all these topics in intuitive way which kind of sources or books you refer???
5:59 YOU ARE WRONG !!!!!!
Kinetic energy should not increase due to the confinement of electron it increases due to more frequency
Most probably what you trying to say is the uncertainty in momentum and Kinetic energy increases due to decrease in uncertainty in electron position 😊
@bhavysoni2188 That is exactly what he said
Over time
This is the topic that is being handled in the most non-intuitive ways possible in schools. But, you are the great one to explore this in detail. Hats off to your hard work for this video. How many of you agree?
He is a Jedi😮😮
Agreed!
But how exactly should it be explained? Highschool students are just learning basic trigonometry and complex numbers, you can't teach them spherical harmonics even in this hand-wavy way except to more talented students that are preparing for physics/chemistry olympiad. It's always a trade off between accuracy and immediate practical utility. Unfortunately, the time is simply better spent on teaching other concepts that are mathematically much more straightforward. Also, I think the capability of average highschool student to understand geometric arguments in 3D is severely overestimated.
@@Ennar Iam not telling that high school students needs to be inculcated with all the necessary stuffs required for the rigorous treatment of quantum mechanics. Ofcourse, understanding orbitals and their successors are the stepping stones of the quantum mechanics that needs to be dealt in such a way that it doesn't involve rote learning of orbitals without even knowing about the underlying principle for the formation in an intuitive way is a kind of absurd thing to do
Well, I specifically asked you how. "Things could be better" is a nice thought, but not very useful. I'd say "here's a cheat-sheet that we are going to use" is still much better than "well, kids, I guess you are learning about bonds in college since we don't have intuitive understanding of orbitals yet". If you insisted on this approach that you need to understand how results are derived in order to use them properly, nobody would get a PhD before they are 50, so there's that.
the analogy of standing waves and the probability wave was just .....woh. you nailed it man
I was just thinking the same thing....I love this analogy, and it makes so much sense!
I cant appreciate him enough
This channel needs more appreciation
Yes wayy more
True man
Honestly
the quality this man puts out and his intuitive and simple explanations are just inhuman....
Thanks!!!!!
I am a student of class 11th in India and I was confused about it since day 1!!!
Phewww..... What a relief now!
I have tears in my eyes now!!!!!!
I appreciate the beauty of physics more now❤
Hi i am too from India
And now I am in 12th .
I tried my best in 11th to understand it
But nowhere I can get the intuition
So i just cram it fir exam and all And i didn't like it.
But now I can feel it too.
Tears too in my eyes
Didnt make sense for dz² tho..
@@monishrules6580
Well sir said that intuition is lost here cause
It is geometrical approach
That we can arrange the two nodes in 5 ways
Brilliant. Brilliant. Brilliant. No, I'm not talking about the software. I'm talking about the video and the author of the video. This is THE BEST video I have seen so far this year. I thought I would never be able to understand electron orbitals intuitively in my lifetime, UNTIL NOW. Thanks so much for making this video.
In terms of pedagogy on such cutting-edge subjects, Mahesh, you're exceptional! You single-handedly replace years of incomprehensible blah, blah, blah with the obvious. You have a real gift (in addition to intelligence). Thank you for your work.
As a PhD student in physics, it is truly a pleasure to see your intuition in visualizing complex matters. Thank you very much!
I hope you continue to explore atomic and solid-state problems. It would be very interesting to hear your perspective on the many-body problems!
Hi @FloatHeadPhysics! I am a PhD Physics candidate and have been following your channel for a while now. Well, all your videos are highly appreciable for the animations, presentation, references and intuition but this one, to me personally, stands out brilliantly.
Having the experience to read, imagine and teach physics at various levels, this is one of the toughest areas to teach and make the students realise the importance of this model. It is hard at the school level and also at the UG/PG level when the students are equipped with the Schrodinger equation.
This is the most detailed and yet clear demonstration I have seen on this topic. Kudos bro! Keep growing! ❤
yes u finally covered this topic!! I spent a whole week tying to grasp this concept and still felt like smth was missing, it was ur explanation! thanks a lot 😭
Best ever description of spherical harmonics only saying "spherical harmonics" once. 🙂 Very nicely done.
I am genuinely stunned. Always knew that orbital is the region where the probability of finding an electron is maximum, but I never learnt it this way! You’re great Mahesh!
This is such a good channel!
I like your intuition, maybe for the d orbitals you could propose anothe rule for angular nodes: because they are symmetrical, the must intersect the center or the nucleus.
With this rule you can construct nodes with planes that cross the center, and maybe if you consider as valid a node that has 0 curvature You can count the cone! So a valid solution with this rule is to add 2 planar or angular nodes as one that bisects the cloud and another one that is a cone perpendicular to that first node, then you can explain more or less intuitively the dz² orbital, and has the nice property that is also one with ml=0 because you can rotate it and doesnt change. The dx²-y² is a little bit more complicated but if you draw the 4 other d orbitals, you can see that something is missing in that direction and you can construct it with the corresponding nodes.
I think the octet rule is a simple way to start to predict stuff for elements of the A group, but I always had the feeling that it isnt very good for understanding, that is not a way to sy it isnt important because when you really understand the inner structure of these type of rules, you keep using octet 😅. We must remember that the octet rule was proposed as an empirical way to describe things that were observed of chemistry.
Nice work on this, reminds me of how I was constructing my own way to remember the things, the radial and planar nodes were truly the crucial step for me in this path, then, thinking in orbitals is one of my favourite ways of understanding chemical reactions and mechanisms, but I dont know if you will get there, to valence bond theory and molecular orbitals.
I am a senior Pediatricians and a physics lover and a big fan of your way of teaching...you are really a great teacher....your hard work and intuitive thinking make me understand what I couldn't understand with my school learning..,.. hats off to your pure effort.❤
i remember my chemstry teacher just told us to learn the probablity vs distance graphs but it never sat rght with me i am so glad i found this
stuff like this is so exicting
Solved my doubts about radial and angular nodes tysm 😊
I have no words to appreciate you.
You're so great bro!
Good evening Mahesh sir, most awaited content for me
I recall having to memorize these orbitals in my collage physics 101 course. Neither the instructor or the text presented this in any other manner than just "except this as fact." How hard would it have been to take 20 minutes to explain this the way you just did? That B- could have been an A+ with just a little effort from the educational system.
You cant expect college to spoon feed you. That's primary school stuff, maybe high school if even.
If you are in college taking physics all of this should have been taught to you. Even in advanced classes in high school you teach potential well and the standing wave examples - and definitely in university - it's literally the 101.
Another brilliant video 👌👌
This man never change since i watch his vid explaining about light, still energetic and clear explanation.
Love to know that❤
This guy is an absolute genius with a real gift for teaching.
The best explanation I have ever seen. Well done.
What is this wave that is confined? Is it like a field that the proton has? And does that destructively interfere with the electrons wave? Or is this just an analogy to visualize it?
Bravo Mahesh, Bravo!! 👏
Love this!! Great job Mahesh!
Absolutely Brilliant. The best freshman chemistry explanation of quantum numbers ever
My man how can you explain anything with soooooooooo ease and yet it detailed has hell , thankyou sooo much , i would also like you to explain gibbs free energy
Thank you, Mahesh, for taking something that I enjoy studying and helping me to understand it with the passion it deserves. This video and the standing waves analogy put orbitals into perspective for me in a new and fundamental way. Thank you so very much.
bro you're everything right with youtube! amazing video
Up until you started talking about planar nodes, everything made sense to me on an intuitive level. You did a great job explaining how the radial nodes arise from standing wave behavior, but I don't understand what a planar node means in that context.
cant believe it!
I feel like being blessed that a topic that I just read came here to me and Its has been uploaded just 1 hour ago for me !!!
10/10❣
Ay that heart looks like the p orbital kinda
the explanation provided for no. of orientations - rocked my understanding. absolutely brilliant as always.
One of your best videos yet.
We need more of you, I hope the Pauli exclusion principal doesn't apply to you.
I never understood nodes in atomic structures so well before!
A truly great explanation by Mahesh!
Mr Mahesh we love you....
HI MAHESH, I HOPE WE DO A TALK TOGETHER, AND I WISH I CAN SAY THANKYOU TO YOU TO MAKE ME FEEL FOUND MY FIRST BEST SCIENCE TEACHER!
Thank you soooo much, this is extremely helpful and clear, like always, just love your channel and what you do, thank you again!!
Amazing explanation. Never thought we can understand the orbitals by taking a standing wave and visualizing in this way. My heartful appreciations to you. Really great depiction.
We're lucky that the problem factors into [radial] x [angular] parts. The angular part really is _just_ standing waves on spherical surface, about which much has been written for application in physics, chemistry, engineering, computer animation, helio-seismology, etc etc... just google "Spherical Harmonics".
The left over radial part is also just a standing wave on a weird coordinate: it's radial, so it has a radius squared weighting (from 4pi r^2), and then it sits in a 1/r potential..it's not as simple as "a wave on a string", but the problem is solved and the solutions are called "Laguerre polynomials".
WHY THE HELL DOES THIS CHANNEL DON'T HAVE A MILLION SUBSCRIBERS ALREADY!!!!!
we need more ppl who like physics.
Too simple and slow paced for me.
This is explained in NCERT chemistry pretty well. Since I've taught my student quantum mechanical model really well,it was kinda easier for me to get it. Beautifully explained !!
Hey Mahesh. Amazing video, as always. But...
There's one thing I'd really like to see explained, intuitively. And you even mentioned it in this video. Could you do the Pauli's Exclusion Principle?
Mahesh, you're a fantastic teacher! Love it!
Best explanation of this concept ever 👌🙌
Loved the animation and the work you put into your content man ! So informative and catchy ahaha..
Love your content. Thank you for educating us ❤
I truly love your videos - since about 4 weeks I can´t wait to listen to your new contents. Great job, thank you so much Sir!
Please teach us differential equations, it is the basic tool to understand physics,.... please please please, you are the best physics teacher in the world. I wish I had a teacher like you in my school days
my man helped me digest my ever long curiosity kudos mate!
Wow, thank you, your one step at a time approach makes it understandable. You also mentioned Schroedinger and no cats were hurt in your explanation. 😇
bro thanks i had an exam next week on this topic
Love your passion! Really enjoyed this presentation. 👍🏻
Cant wait for the next video!
Can't wait for the next one!
I'm so excited for the next video
promise the next video must be on OCTATE RULE!
Yes!! This is the base for that video.
@@Mahesh_ShenoyThanku sir
You actually make me feel the topic
I was very much freaked about this
I tried hard but no intuition I get from anywhere
Thanku sir that you make video on this.
Actually now teras in my eyes .
@@Mahesh_Shenoy I DEMAND A EXPLANATION FOR DZ² AND DX²-Y²!!! also check if it extends to f orbitals ... or just present the math but simplified ;-;
Just found your channel and subscribed, that was incredibly well explained what a fantastic insight!
You have the best channel on youtube. Thank you :)
Finally, I have got intuition.
I love your way to explain natural phenomena without the traditional mathematical approach.❤
great video, thank you Mahesh sir
Fantastic. Very much appreciate your work!
Im really thankful for your videos. I can see your channel's objective and im happy to say that you are going in the right direction. Thanks!
I learnt a lot . Thanks sir
Yes, that was very intuitive. Thank you.
Excellent video!
As far as spin is concerned, I believe it comes from the Dirac equation, that extends the Schrödinger equation to include special relativity, so to speak. I’m not familiar with the details, but it has to do with “spinors”, abstract mathematical objects used in the Dirac equation. And as you explained, it also has to do with the Pauli exclusion principle.
I look forward to watch the next video!
Loved it mahesh... this was always a confusing topic for me...❤❤
Best explanation of this I've seen yet! Have a sub. 👍
Awesome. You/he has me looking ahead!
Omg I always wanted to understand electron orbitals! Finally...
I am enjoying your quantum mechanics series sir , it really helps me to visualise such subject for which I know only math.
this video is gold, thank you
Amazing work! Love this channel so much
Bro thanks so much! This is great!
I comment on this channel more than any others because it’s just awesome! Thanks so much for your education! 😊
At first glance I thought it shouldn't be that hard to understand the different d orbitals but I was wrong and ended up spending quite a while writing things out. The second, third, and fourth d orbitals at 24:00 are each from planar nodes along two of the three xy, yz, xz planes, while the first is the second orbital rotated by 45 degrees. It seems that all orbitals comprising two perpendicular planes through the origin need to be built from at least these four basis orbitals. To see this, note that any such orbital can be described by two surface normals whose dot product is zero. If we write out the pairs of surface normals (v1, v2) for the second to fourth orbitals, we will find that linear combinations of the three (v1, v2) do not span R3xR3 - an additional orbital such as the first is needed to do so. The 5th orbital looks completely different from the rest and seems to be built from cones extending out from the origin rather than planes. I guess linear combinations of the 5th orbital with the others can rotate the cones in any direction.
By the way, this was a really nice way to understand the shape of spherical harmonics. In college, all I remember was being given the harmonics as solutions of Schrodinger's and shown what they look like. I never really gave much thought to why they had to look the way they did, but your analogy with standing waves made me look at them in a new light. Kudos!
Okay The whole video was so well done but i have a doubt.From the analogy of the standing wave in a string we can have a node in between nucleus to infinity ( a symmetric radial node) but how can we come up with a planer node because this doesn't fit with the analogy. So was the analogy just to realise the no. of nodes or is there some way to also explain this.
I just found your channel, and you sir are truly an amazing teacher.
Subbed and can't wait to learn more from you 😊.
Fascinating! You explain it so well. And in fact, although I do watch science videos relatively often, I've never seen an explanation of their shapes before. Well done!
One question I do still have, though, is why "arbitrarily close to infinity" is so nearby, meaning why the drop-off is so quick, rather than taking up a lot more of the universe. I wonder if it has to do with the speed of light and these particles not being able to get so far away in a certain time. But then again, I've also heard that quantum particles don't move on a completely understandable path, and a particle could theoretically show up anywhere, even if the chances are less than the age of the universe, so that point is still somewhat puzzling...
Love your videos
Will watch this tonight after completing my homework
You are forcing me to love chemistry ❤
I will finally have some intuition about this stuff
Can't wait for the next video you mentioned.
Need to wait for a while though :D. At least a month.
What about Aufbau principles???? Energy dependent on n+l rule, how energy depends upon azimuthal quantum number‼️‼️‼️‼️
Addicted to your videos!
Intuition on valence bond theory and MOT, would be nice!
Wonderful!
absolute masterclass
As a neet aspirant Atomic Structure is one of my most dreaded chapter and it shows up in both physics and chemistry which just makes it 10x worse but now I am looking forward to studying it, can't wait for the other videos on this.
Thankyou so much sir
Always grateful for your hardwork.
The electron magic number for stability and the magic number for proton and nuetron in nucleus seem to appear from no where.
You could derive them from Schrodinger's equation if you solve it for the hydrogen atom.
Amazing video 😍
15:21 this is really really good representation, yeah.
I like brilliant also, I just adore to learn with cool visualization tools, maybe because I'm really really bad at drawing.
That was amazing!!
Just remember that - regardless of quantum numbers and how many s,p,d, or f orbitals are occupied or empty in any shell - the distribution of electron density about an isolated atom is always spherical. Regardless of which way the orbitals point. They aren't real, they're just a way - the way - of evenly partitioning eletron density into 1, 3, 5, 7 etc directions. That's all.
need that next video man my University test is coming up
Impressive !!
you are the best!!!
18:00 Can you please explain, why did we need to slice that at the first, who told us to do so, and why can't we do this in the ground state?? --this doesn't match with the wavelength theory , does it? Btw Thank you Thank you Thank you Thank you Thank you Thank you Thank you Thank you Thank you Thank you Thank you Thank you Thank you Thank you Thank you Thank you Thank you Thank you Thank you Thank you Thank you Thank you Thank you Thank you Thank you Thank you Thank you Thank you Thank you Thank you Thank you Thank you Thank you Thank you Really Thank you man, I was confused so much about this thing, I am crying now, you can read my name and understand why
Finally this is science ,❤❤❤❤❤❤❤❤❤❤❤❤
Can you please make a video on how to effectively Read physics textbooks to understand at intuitive level like you. I revived my love for physics bcz of you