I really appreciate the methodical, largely dispassionate approach you are taking in addressing CRT in the culture and in the Church. You are quietly stepping up to the plate and knocking one ball after another over the fence. Please keep up the excellent work that you are doing.
Most people fail to realize that correlation is not the same as causation. A fatherless issue in 'black communities' is not due to skin colour. This is a freeing thing.
Thank you so much for these! I have felt that almost every other Evangelical that is trying to address the CRT issue has been fairly vague and ambiguous, leading to unfruitful discussion. Thank you for bringing out the history behind it to help better understand this sociological phenomenon.
Sorry, but I don’t get the sense that you’re actually familiar with CRT itself. The heart of it is actually about judicial activism. The people who wrote about it and pushed it were attorneys. Yes, there are sociological and other aspects to it, but only as it relates to the hard power that can only come from black letter law. Brown was a landmark case that was extremely special. There are only a few cases like it. CRT has been co-opted by other disciplines, but that’s how it started- postmodern legal realism. They are “rhetorical fallacies.”
I really appreciate the methodical, largely dispassionate approach you are taking in addressing CRT in the culture and in the Church. You are quietly stepping up to the plate and knocking one ball after another over the fence. Please keep up the excellent work that you are doing.
Most people fail to realize that correlation is not the same as causation. A fatherless issue in 'black communities' is not due to skin colour. This is a freeing thing.
Thank you so much for these! I have felt that almost every other Evangelical that is trying to address the CRT issue has been fairly vague and ambiguous, leading to unfruitful discussion. Thank you for bringing out the history behind it to help better understand this sociological phenomenon.
Sorry, but I don’t get the sense that you’re actually familiar with CRT itself. The heart of it is actually about judicial activism. The people who wrote about it and pushed it were attorneys. Yes, there are sociological and other aspects to it, but only as it relates to the hard power that can only come from black letter law.
Brown was a landmark case that was extremely special. There are only a few cases like it.
CRT has been co-opted by other disciplines, but that’s how it started- postmodern legal realism.
They are “rhetorical fallacies.”
Well done still! Run for president, You've got my vote!
Interesting conversation.
"Parent number one... the Dad." Sounds sexist! lol