Oswald acted alone, thought he had been set up. Which is where the "Patsy" comes from and yes he was silenced because of what Oswald saw from the sixth floor window. Lee knew what had actually happened, Ruby carried out his job to perfection and the American public has no damn business knowing the truth. You have a good day sir.
@@markdelgado8963 An absolutely enormous amount of evidence of conspiracy before, during and after the assassination. You can literally go down any of the various rabbit trails and quickly realize that "coincidence' doesnt apply here
A maintenance man said he saw Oswald eating lunch downstairs while it happened - he was never questioned by the Warren Commission. Of course, the Warren Commission is a neat package, that makes you believe only certain things.
I am British living in England and I was 17 at the time of the assassination. The very minute I saw on the news that Ruby had killed Oswald, even as a teenager, I never believed that Oswald did it, and certainly not that he was working alone. Nothing that came out later about who Ruby was, and nothing in the decades since have altered my mind. Quite the contrary.
That makes no sense; "I never believed that Oswald did it, and certainly not that he was working alone.": First you say he didn't do it, then you say he did but not alone.
At the age of 89 I never believed the Warren Commission, at the time or now, and I never met anyone who did believe it. Ruby was extremely well known by every local cop as the local head of the mafia. Yet he got into Police headquarters armed.
I'm 75 and I believe the Warren Commission. I actually read it 15 years ago. Those who say they don't believe the Commission's report never read the damn thing. I retired early and had lots of time on my hands. The volumes of the Report were difficult to wade through, but those investigators were very thorough. We know now that they did not cover all the possible bases, but what committee does?
@@Dr.Pepper001 I've been studying the JFK killing for 40 yrs and the Warren commission was a bunch of garbage and yes I've read it myself..and seen interviews.. archive footage.read almost everything about this subject and I can tell this commission was formed to cover up this great tragedy LBJ himself didn't believe a word of it.and neither does 85% of the American people to this day..you keep right on drinking the government Kool aid sir !!!
@@Dr.Pepper001 I'm a natural born skeptic, as kid I questioned everything from the church I attended to the politicians running for office. I'm 60. One day, about 10 or 12 years of age, I asked my dad about the JFK assassination and that I sincerely thought the shooter could in no way have fired off 3 shots in 6 seconds and hit JFK's head in a moving car with that rifle. I knew about the rifle because my dad told me about it and also we used to go target practice a lot with my brothers, my dad owned a few rifles, I knew a little about guns , anyway, long story short, he said he felt strongly that the Warren Commission was a cover up, that it didn't sit well with him. I have not read it, but have read a couple of books on the subject. Probably the main reason I didn't read through the drudgery, that is the Warren Report, is because of one man...Allen Dulles. And I think you know why. Sir, the fix was in. "It is the first responsibility of every citizen to question authority" - Benjamin Franklin
@@alwagner9722 -- There were 3 shots in 6 seconds. Oswald had the rifle cocked with a round in the chamber by the time JFK rounded the corner. He aimed in on his target and pulled the trigger. That was the 1st shot. It's at that precise second that the 6 seconds begin. He only has 2 more rounds to fire over those 6 seconds, not 3 rounds. He cocks the rifle again, aims, and fires the 2nd round. He cocks again, aims, and fires the 3rd round. At that precise instant, the 6 seconds end. Most people say to themselves, "In 6 seconds he had to cock, aim, and fire the rifle 3 times during those 6 seconds." No, he didn't. He had to cock, aim, and fire 2 times. I was in the Marines from 1964 to 1968. I trained and qualified at the rifle range with the M-14, which fired in the semiautomatic mode. Oswald had a bolt action rifle that, like the M-14, was a fairly high powered rifle. It had recoil so after each shot he needed about a second to get the rifle scope cross hairs back on target. It was definitely possible for him to fire off 3 rounds in 6 seconds. After I left the Corps I bought a Mauser bolt action rifle. I took it to a rifle range near Salt Lake City and duplicated what Oswald did. Using the same scenario as I described above, I hit a stationary target 3 times in 6 seconds. Don't tell me it's not possible.
@@alwagner9722 Oh Lord.. Somebody from the intelligence community was gonna be on that commission.. So, what’s the problem?.. lol.. I’d give weight to that gripe if I didn’t know for a fact you guys would be suspicious of whoever made it on that commission from the intelligence community.. Because you’re crackpots..
Doesn't matter who actually pulled the trigger, our Intelligence Community was responsible. Either directly or in their failure to prevent it. So they are either corrupt or incompetent, in any case they need to be stripped of their duties and we should start over. Our Federal law enforcement is rotten to the core, current events are proving this true.
Matt Ruby was part of the Jewish Mafia. JFK was opposed to Israel developing nuclear weapons and sympathetic to the plight of the Palestinians. Incompetence doesn't come into it. They wanted him gone !
How on earth does a man accused of killing a policeman and a president not have legal representation not to mention how does a guy just walk right thru security and kill Oswald in front of millions
@@liljimlambert7According to the Wikipedia article on LEE HARVEY OSWALD: - G. Robert Blakey, chief counsel for the House Select Committee on Assassinations from 1977 to 1979, said: "The most plausible explanation for the murder of Oswald by Jack Ruby was that Ruby had stalked him on behalf of organized crime, trying to reach him on at least three occasions in the forty-eight hours before he silenced him forever."[252]
Ruby just said why he killed Oswald, because of the people around him that would benefit from it and he would not be vindicated. This was just ONE of many cover-ups in the history of our government. This was 1963, how bad is it now??????
@@grissom2023 that's seems likely, wonder if there is any evidence of such an occurrence, money in the Rubenstein (ruby) family or something like that. Also possibly the CIA induced him with cancer to get rid of him. they couldn't very well have another prisoner shot, could they?
@@robertramberg8219 Oswald because the little Marxist was scared out of his damn mind. The reasons for which he was silenced by Ruby, because of what Oswald saw and knew. By the way, watch Ruby's assassination of Oswald. It is a textbook mob hit, as Ruby had been a foot soldier in both the Chicago and New Orleans mob. He was a seasoned killer, period. Which is why Ruby was ordered to silence Oswald and carried out the hit to perfection.
Ruby came down with a case of that mysterious fast-acting cancer which has plagued a number of other potential witnesses, government actors, people with close connections, and agent provocateurs; not only in this case ... but in a number of others, as well. Nothing to see here, though, folks.
Let's not forget Martha Mitchell...wife of U.S. Attorney General John Mitchell during Watergate.....who claimed agents held her while she was forcibly given a shot. SHE then died of cancer soon after, just like what happened to victims described by Judy Vary Baker, the scientist who was supposedly Oswald's lover and who worked on the weaponization of virulent cancer to be used by the CIA. In the end, Watergate was about the Kennedy assassination and fear that the truth would come out.
Silenced? About what? He didn't have a clue as to what was really going on except to perform an unprovable story that incriminated him along with a personal history that played into a pattern of being guilty. The 'Times' proves it; the media hung him before ANY body was even cold yet.
@@donjindra Show EXACTLY where the OP said mob silenced LHO. He just said there were ties and that's true. CIA works w. mob all the time. They're called 'assets'.
@@lukecage3569 There was a clear implication that the mob silenced LHO: "Ruby had strong ties to the mob. Oswald wasn't just killed, he was silenced!" Why mention the mob and silencing if there was no connection between the concepts? Of course that's what he meant.
Just looking at the parade route is a tip off that there was a conspiracy; open windows, a kink in the parade route, minimal secret service. I think it's interesting that at the first shot, Johnson hit the floor of his limo (when most people thought it was a firework) and Connelly exclaimed, "They're going to kill us all!" What did these men know?
I always wondered why they just didn't go straight through Dealey Plaza. But instead made a right turn, then a hard left in front of book depository. Seems odd
Oh yeah, Ruby who had mob connections, who the Kennedy's back stabbed, was just so upset that someone killed Kennedy he had to go shoot him. I'm still amazed everyday at the stupidity of people.
Stupidity--please look who was freshman congressman Nixon's FIRST hire in l946--Jack Ruby! Nixon knew the mob and was sent to silence LHO on Sunday morning!
Exactly. The mob has a tough enough time keeping the Feds off their backs for the normal crimes they are involved in, do you think they are going kill the President? Dumb!
Poor Oswald was a deer in the headlights of history. I certainly believe him when he said "I didn't shoot anyone, no sir!" The media, as it turned out, was very selective in publicizing Ruby's comments. He was widely quoted as as saying he killed Oswald to spare Jackie a trial, but everything else he said - things like "If Adlai Stevenson was VP this whole thing wouldn't have happened" - were, of course, ignored.
That’s why Ruby killed him, not to silence him for any conspiracy but because most Americans would have shot him given half a chance. Oswald shot and killed Officer Tippit in his desperate bid to escape, escape what? Oswald fired the rifle from the window, ran down the stairs and blended in with the crowd. Look at how conspiracy theories balloon, some comments here about 9/11 being a conspiracy too, complete madness.
Ruby stated clearly that it was a conspiracy. He said it was timed exactly by seconds. And if it was timed that way then someone in the police department I in guilty of telling me what time Oswald was coming down. And if it was a conspiracy then that little girl was a part of it.
Let’s not forget that Dorothy Kilgallen was interviewing Jack Ruby about the assassination and she was found dead in her home under suspicious circumstances!!
Kilgallen is just another one of those coincidences in a VERY long line of coincidences concerning the JFK assassination...Why should any of us be so suspicious about it ?...Because our Spidey Senses are SCREAMING conspiracy, and have been for a long time now, that's why !
@@ronaldholmes8525 No doubt Ronald - this was a professional hit (Oswald just didn't get lucky) and was planned out in advance. People knew there was some very politically unhappy people in Texas so why would you have the President riding in an open car. No FBI in the buildings - none behind the fence in the grassy noel. Most FBI agents were out late getting drunk - a total screw up by those who were supposed to protect the President.
I was 13 years old, used to come home after school and when JFK did a news conference, it was pure joy- The day of the assassination is still one of the worst for this once teenager.
Ruby is a fascinating person. His mob connections are indisputable. He was an FBI informant. And all three agencies including the CIA and Secret Service were aware of Oswald and yet no one thought they should tail him on the day of the parade or have the windows shut on the parade route at the most obvious point. Either they are incompetent or corrupt. Your choice. I think a little of both. But Ruby? He practically spent the weekend at the police station and everyone there knew him. They knew he was a pimp and part of the mob, and yet they didn't even try to stop him. Actually, they enabled his opportunity. Having the entire exchange covered by dozens of media figures? A wide-open garage? with 50 people or more there? Unforgivable. They have no credibility whatsoever.
Many police officers were regular clients at Jack Ruby's Carousel Club. He knew them well, they knew him too. Without a trial the NYT already decided that Oswald was the president's killer. Like today, the media was part of the conspiracy and of indoctrinating the narrative.
Theyre not incompetent. They knew exactly what they were doing. As time goes on, more and more comes out linking Oswald to the CIA, the mob, he grew up in the homes of some of those mobsters, he was connected to Ruby, all the strangeness of connections to and interactions with George Demorenshildt, Bush with Arbusto Energy, and their ships, and mob and casinos in Cuba, and Miami, Florida, New Orleans, his time in New Orleans, and all the Sheep Dipping, and Allen Dulles. Its crazy. No Oswald did it alone. I don't even think he did it at all. He was a patsy. He didn't fire a gun that day.
@@ultramagapurebloodpride8294 Well, his father definitely did and they did help him in the election. But most of all, Bobby was an arch-enemy of the Mob and they had to have seen him as a threat.
The assassination of Kennedy was a text book "cover your tracks" scenario when Ruby shot Oswald, who was not supposed to have gotten caught. With Oswald in custody there was no way the planners of the crime could allow him to be interrogated so enter Jack Ruby who had a checkered past which could be used as leverage against him and would have access to get close enough to Oswald to take him out. Otherwise, what motive would Ruby have for killing Oswald therefore ruining his life unless someone put him up to it.
True, but the only damaging Oswald had to say was that he never hit Kennedy in the head. That as he aimed his third shot the head exploded. Which is why called himself a patsy.
That's why the police officer was taken out. Because they didn't want the police to take Oswald alive. They figured that would get the job done. But they were wrong.
@@aaronz7056 Hey its you again. For someone that doesn't believe this stuff you sure are in a lot of these videos. It's almost as if it's your job to keep the lie alive. 😉
And Texas is just or more corrupt as it was at that time. (I am 93 yrs. old and live with it every day). Latest incident was last week where 19 children and 2 teachers were killed in Uvalde as Police stood inactive in rescue.
You mean you don't believe that Jack Ruby would sacrifice all, his freedom , his nightclub, and possibly even his life if a cop had shot HIM, just to spare Jackie Kennedy from a horrible trial ? Never mind that Jackie just two days prior had seen her husband get part of his head blown off and that she was covered in blood and brain matter from her husband ...Nothing could be more horrible than THAT ! I'm pretty sure that Jackie could have withstood a trial to get some justice for her dead husband....You mean you really don't believe their made-up narrative of why Ruby did what he did.? ...I'm sure your government is very disappointed in you . THEY worked so hard creating this fairytale.
@@ronaldholmes8525 The scary part is that the government story was swallowed whole by (it seems) the whole ruling class. Hard to believe they all were part of a plot. So why did they all go along?
Im not even convinced he died of cancer in prison. Im not sure if there is real actusl proof of his death or not. He could have just been released under that guise.
One thing I've heard is that a police officer went into the school book depository immediately after the shots were fired where he encountered Oswald in the breakroom several floors down from the place he supposedly fired from. In this account it stated that Oswald would not have had enough time to reach the breakroom by the time the officer arrived had he fired the shots. Has this account been verified either way?
the paraffin test was positive for nitrates found in the ink in the books and boxes he had been loading by hand on to carts to be shipped out but the test was negative for gun shot residue this means two things he had not washed his hands to remove the nitrates and he did NOT fire a rifle or pistol that day
Also in question is the "source" of Ruby's cancer! He did, in wanting to be taken securely, to D.C. indicate he was in fear of his life. He said too many people had too many ways to kill him!
Yes I remember in the movie Ruby that is mentioned as well. We know you can in fact introduce cancer cells into people. Dr Sam Shepard who was eventually proven innocent allowed researchers to put cancer cells into him while inprisoned.
I watched the Tonight Show when Martha Mitchell said men broke into her Hotel Room, held her down and injected something into her! She died of Cancer shortly after!
Ruby killed the patsy and ended up being one himself. "The people who had to have so much to gain, and had such an ulterior motive, to put me in the position I'm in, will never let the true facts come above board to the world." -- Jack Ruby
"The commission has functioned in a fashion which totally disregards the rights of the accused." Sounds familiar? What about those "accused" and remain in prison regarding Jan. 6, 2021?
So JFK was allegedly shot by Oswald. Then before Oswald could talk, Ruby shot Oswald. Then before Ruby could talk, he died in jail. Nothing going on here folks!
You're right, nothing going on here. "Before Ruby could talk..." he'd had over 3 years to talk, including at his trial where he could have come forward with any public statement he wanted to make.
Actually, Ruby did talk a bit and was the basis for his contracting a fast-acting cancer (even though he had regular routine check-ups, which showed he was in good health).
Have you ever seen the Zapruder film with a bullet trajectory added and coming from the storm drain? Looks pretty much perfect to me, splatter, movement and all.
The direction a person's head goes after being shot is meaningless regarding what direction the bullet came from. Kennedy's head goes slightly forward at the instant of impact and blood and gore went in all directions.
@@aaronz7056 we don't really have the blood spatter evidence in this case because law the limousine was ruined as evidence by the executive branch of the u.s. govt. and probably same thing with the corpse.
I have studied this case for several years I have seen hundreds if not thousands of documentaries about this case. I just hope that I will get all the information and all of the details of what actually happened 11-22-1963 before I pass away.
I think many of us feel that way. Millions still living (I was 11) have resigned ourselves to the fact that (what used to be America) had a coup. Period.
Sorry, that isn't likely...The assassination was covered up extremely well by a lot of evil people, and too much time has gone by to expect to know the full truth of what happened that day in Dallas , and the immediate days afterwards. They say a case begins to go cold after just 48 hours . .Imagine how cold this case is after nearly 60 years. But the clues we have that conspiracy WAS involved are many , too many , to think otherwise. God knows the whole truth ....Maybe someday we'll hear it from Him.
@@haroldbrown5308 Would hope so Harold but doubt will ever see light of day til our generation is gone. Imo it WAS so nefarious, so traumatic; if ever it'll be a sidenote to (almost) ancient history. People will have far bigger fish to fry in that era. Only God knows what they'll have to be dealing with then. "JF who??"
Aquilla Clemons said TWO men were there when Tippit was shot...neither of whom resembled Oswald . Then 2 days later an investigator came and said she should NOT tell anyone or she might get hurt. No conspiracy, huh?
Clemons didn't see the shooting. She saw the aftermath. And every person who did see the shooting (five) said it was one man who shot Tippit. All the bullets from Oswald's gun were removed from Tippit's body. Do a little more reading on the subject.
@@bruceberman761 Clemons was utterly clear...and was told that harm could come to her. THis is a constant theme of the literal hundreds of rabbit trails connected to the conspiracy
@@barriewright6727 But isn't it true that when he tried to shoot a policeman, it malfunctioned and wouldn't fire? In other words, wasn't he given that gun to make him a defenseless and easy target?
I believe Oswald was supposed to be killed by the police when they found him after shooting a Dallas police officer. Unfortunately for the planners of this situation, Dallas police department followed protocol and arrested Oswald which caused a new situation that had to be dealt with quickly. This is where Ruby comes in.
How does a conspiracy know: - Oswald will immediately flee the TSBD - Oswald will successfully escape Dealey Plaza - Oswald owns a revolver - exactly where the revolver is - Oswald will definitely go specifically to Oak Cliff - a cop will be killed at 10th and Patton at exactly the right moment for Oswald to get blamed for it - the cop won't simply outdraw and capture his attacker - every cop who happens to be among the first ones to arrive at the theater in answer to a tip about a suspect in a cop-killing is likely to slaughter the suspect at the scene Etc.?
Oswald had a Revolver... The bullet casings found at the Tippit crime scene were out of semi automatic pistols, Pistols, There were Two Different Casings found... Also, Revolvers do not eject the fired rounds, they store in the Revolver... Besides, before the Revolver disappeared, tests performed said the Firing Pin on it was bent...
@@montydaniels1054 Revolver did not disappear, the firing pin was fine, and bullets were matched to it. Who the heck do you *think* shot Tippit, for goodness' sake?
Lee Harveys 2nd cousins neighbors ex wife once worked with a distant relatvie of J Edgar Hoover. Now get this, Hoovers childhood teachers brother-in-law was in New Orleans at the time of the shootings and actually picked up and read one of the Communist leaflets Oswald had passed out. Now this is where it gets weird. The man who printed those leaflets...well his grandfather was friends with a women whose boss once dated a women that knew someone that knew Lincolns assasin...Booth. Now if that doesnt convince you of a conspiracy then keep watching the countless similar conspiracies.
“For some time I have been disturbed by the way the CIA has been diverted from its original assignment,” “It has become an operational and at times a policy-making arm of the Government" wrote former president Harry Truman in the Washington Post on December 22, 1963. It was exactly one month after the assassination of President Kennedy.
"That's how a conspiracy works. Those boys on the gressy knoll, dead within three hours. Buried in unmarked graves out past Terulingua" "You know this for a fact?" "Still got the shovel." Levon Helm - "Shooter"
Oswald was executed to keep the truth from coming out. He and Jack Ruby knew each other very well. There are many eye witnesses that saw them together at a wide variety of venues.
In that case you will now explain how the people framing this innocent man could have known: - he would show up unexpectedly at the house Nov. 21, otherwise they can't pretend he smuggled the rifle Nov. 22 - nobody would ever find any bullets or fragments that don't match to his rifle - he would lie to police about his whereabouts - he would immediately flee the crime scene - he would decide at the last minute to put a jacket on, then discard it - an imposter who looks so much like him he is guaranteed to fool the nearly dozen witnesses who ID Oswald needs to be hanging around 10th and Patton - Officer Tippit won't simply outdraw and capture his attacker - Oswald will agree to help frame himself by getting caught red-handed trying to shoot a second cop - Oswald will fight so violently 3 officers get injured just disarming him - Oswald will observe, "Well, they say it only takes a minute to die" after asking about the penalty for cop-killing - Oswald will turn down help from the President of the Dallas Bar Association - Oswald will act so smug he even convinces his own brother he's guilty - Oswald will just shrug a hollow, rambling reply when asked on live TV, "Did you shoot the President?"
@@aaronz7056 I always thought the fact he took off from the book depository building asap was suspicious enough. If he really had nothing to do with it (or the ludicrous one that he was an FBI informant); then he would have stayed out and given a statesmen of what he saw or heard to the authorities! None of these conspiracy clowns have ever addressed Guus when I brought it up.
It's possible that maybe Oswald was exactly what he said he was a patsy! Oswald was supposed to be a communist and a defecter who went to the Soviet union if he was communist what was he doing in the Marine Corp? In the Marines Communists would be shot by a firing squad! I believe that when he went to Russia the government sent him over there and when he was a marine Oswald was taught the Russian language they wouldn't do that unless they were training you for a job! I firmly believe that after the Marines Oswald started working for the CIA and maybe he was part of the assignation of Kennedy but the man that really shot Kennedy was standing in the grassy knoll area and maybe only Oswald knew who the man was And that's why they silenced him for forever
Without a DOUBT, we NOW know, LHO WAS a CIA asset; BEFORE he "defected"-- go find my response above, regarding the question of Roy Truly and the police officer. I think you also posted a reply there. Was LHO ONE of the shooters? No. Why? Because as Mark Lane said in this video clip (which is the first time I SAW it), the paraffin/GSR test on Oswald was "negative". LHO, true to his statement, "...didn't shoot anybody". Given LHOs level of competence in shooting (barely qualifying) with a SUPERIOR semi-auto rifle [the M1 Garand], shooting at STATIC targets, shooting at a MOVING target, with an old [20+years], Italian, MilSurp, BOLT-ACTION rifle, and HITTING anything would be like shooting at the moon. And as Jim Garrison wrote in his book, "Those who would kill the king, MUST...NOT...MISS." Nobody running such an op, would jeopardize the success of the mission, by 1/3; failure is NOT an option. It's real easy to blame a deadman. And then the CIA uses cancer, to kill Ruby, inside the jail. Read the books "Dr Mary's Monkeys", and Judyth Vary Baker's, "Lee an Me". Foreword is written by Jim Marrs ("Crossfire", one of the two books Oliver Stone used for his JFK movie). LBJ was not the planner, and probably didn't know, until the day before, when he had dinner at a TX oil man's home, named Clint Murcheson. Nixon was there, as was J.E. Hoover; according to the domestic help at the time. LBJ was relied upon for the cover-up, AFTER the fact, as HE was the one who appointed the members of the Warren Commission. Do you think "the fix was in"...?
Absolutely they put Oswald together like a puzzle to be a patsy and making him out to be a communist and a traitor,in reality he was a USA Marine, like I said why would he be in the Marines if he was a communist? Communists would be shot by a firing squad in the Marines! Jack Ruby shot Oswald on TV inside of a police station with 70 armed cops all around at point blank range! Anybody with 1/4 of a brain would know that the whole thing was a set up conspiracy! Only a embasol would believe what the warren commission said!
The film taken by Abraham zapruner showed very clearly that Kennedy was shot from the right which is toward the picket fence on the grassy knoll there were 51 witnesses that said they heard shots come from there including a young couple the Newman's in 2013 when it was the 50th anniversary of the assassination the Newman's now a elder couple still said they heard the shot come over their head and strike Kennedy and it came from the picket fence area and a police officer stopped his motorcycle and ran to the grassy knoll after it happened because he thought the shot came from there as well said that he smelled gunpowder like someone had just fired a rifle
He pissed off alot of people. But none more, than the ones who would be affected most by his proposal to 'change the federal reserve notes'. Unable to launder millions of useless 'notes'.....just....gone. 'They' couldn't let that happen.
Really I didn't know this .but that is a strong contender for his assassination. Hoover I'm not sure what to think about him, definitely Mafia tho . 👁️👁️
Josey Wailer, There you have it! Nice to see someone else that sees that connection. By signing executive order 11110 JFK actually did have several hundred thousand dollars worth of REAL US currency printed, backed by gold and silver. I Actually remember looking at one as a child of 7-8 and noticing that where it now says "Federal Reserve Note" it said "Silver Certificate" and asking my father what that meant. Also the little stamped insignia was red not green. Yeah JFK pissed off a lot of powerful people, CIA, the Mob to name a couple but few people connect the dots to the FED and the private bankers that own it. If Kennedy was allowed to continue printing real interest free money (the way it's supposed to be) it would have eventually knocked the Federal Reserve scam out of business. I believe it's by design that nobody even knows about that pesky little fact. They want everyone pointing fingers at the Mob or CIA or Hoover's FBI, or LBJ as a distraction. My theory is they all played a willing role in it but were just the hired guns....
Also, it seems 911 has faded into obscurity, a lot of questions need to be answered about that day too, cell phones that were impossible to make. Hijackers that do not appear on flight manifests. A huge airliner that disappears after hitting the pentagon. Reporting building seven had collapsed after even seeing it in the television news report. Supposed hijackers found still alive in Saudi Arabia. What was on the bottom of that plane that hit the second building. Insurance payments amounting to the billions. Punt options investments before that tragic event. Need I go on?
Watch the info/pics on PSA flight 182 San Diego 1978. This is what really happens when a fully loaded passenger jet crashes. There are flying body parts everywhere along with the other debris.
@Mark Ross: 100% correct sir. Far too many inconsistencies, coincidences, and occurrences that defied the Laws of Physics. If I may add one more.... The approach of United Airlines Flight 175 before it hit the South Tower was recorded by civilian FAA RADAR towers at a speed of 582 mph, which is impossible for that particular aircraft at such a low altitude. According to Aeronautical Engineers, it would take SIX TIMES the thrust its engine were capable of producing to reach that speed at that altitude, and the aircraft itself would most likely have broken apart before reaching that speed.
@Mark Ross I agree. No alleged hijackers appeared on any video footage at the airports involved. Time stamped images would have been shown if they had been there.
And, the paraffin test would have shown gunshot residue as a result of Officer Tippet’s murder as well. That murder left no time for a clean up when he was arrested at the movie theater. Impossible!
Amazingly, they were so positive that Harvey was the only shooter that LBJ felt perfectly safe enough to hang around for over two hours until a judge could be found so that he could be sworn in on Texas soil. In the famous picture of LBJ being sworn in the chief of the Dallas Police dept is in the photo behind him, He's the one to the right of LBJ with the glasses on, if you look close he doesn't look very happy with or fond of LBJ, Whats going on? Why is he there? Why isn't he out looking for possible accomplices? How did he know there was nothing to worry about, and he didn't need to be at his job ???
LBJ said that it HAD to be a conspiracy - then he is put out of commission. He was a part of it and a beneficiary of it, but once he started talking - they had to put him to an end. Even the HINT of opening their mouths while having been a key player - such as succeeding president, would influence the public to totally believe whatever he said. Even if he were merely trying to take himself out of it for fear of the plot being uncovered, he was running his mouth, so he had to go. Funeral timings with testimonies and running mouths, are never coincidences.
It is so obvious that Oswald never acted alone. LBJ definitely had a lot to do with it. I have no doubt in my mind about this. If you dig deep you'll find all of this to be true by just what's out there.
@@donjindra I bet that you think that the 2020 election wasn't fixed too and still wear that worthless mask in a car by yourself. AmIright??? Do you know what a woman is? How many genders are there?
@@jimwatson4812 I'm so sick of you deranged conspiracy nuts. There must be 1000 popular conspiracies these days and virtually no evidence for any of them. You folks are corrupting society.
They never found his fingerprints on the rifle, it was his palm print and it was the only print found on the rifle. The print was located near the butt of the stock, which is not where the palm would be during firing. This would indicate that the shooter wiped it down after the shooting but before it was found in order to get rid of their own fingerprints. This in turn would indicate that an individual other than Oswald actually did the shooting!
The one question that remains unanswered is: Why did someone who [allegedly] assassinated the president of the US and [allegedly] killed without reason officer Tippit have to go into a movie house and see a movie he had not seen? This makes Lee Harvey Oswald one of the most peculiar "assassins" in the history of crime.
I was surprised on reading the Report how biased against Oswald it felt....as those his guilt was a foregone conclusion. I was a young child when all this happened, and I've always questioned Ruby killing Oswald as a patriotic act from the day it occurred.
The whole thing is monstrous garbage. Even though I know it's a lot more than The Mob,Charles Brandt's new book shows how it's just a bridge to far for our Academics and So Called Historians to acknowledge that 1. You can't trust a Supreme Court Justice 2. Likewise FBI Director. 3.Likewise Former CIA Director. 4. Vice President and then President at all on the Death Of our President at the time for the WC.
If it was just a coincidence that President Kennedy was killed in the home state of the next President, his Vice President Lyndon Johnson than why is it that the President killed before him, President McKinley was killed in the home state of the next President, his Vice President Theodore Roosevelt? If they were just a coincidence than why is it that out of all the Presidents and presidential candidates in the last 120 plus years since McKinley, the only other assassination was President Kennedy's brother, Robert, while Johnson was still President, in the home state of the next President, another Vice President, Richard Nixon? If they were all just a coincidence than why was it that Vice President Al Gore, running for President was politically killed by a voting controversy in the home state of the brother of the next President, Bush43, the son of a Vice President that wanted to be President again, Bush41? Coincidence or evidence of home state conspiracy of Vice Presidents that wanted to be President?
I've never met a person who could keep a secret. Still, people insist that everything is a conspiracy. Whenever a group of people do anything, someone always opens their yap. Usually things are exactly what they seem. Thinking otherwise is just your fear of the world around you.
I've always wondered, why didn't Oswald shoot while the car was slowing to make the turn, instead, waiting for the parade to be going away from him while speeding up. I have not been able to find anywhere this is discussed.
The shot came from the sewer hitting JFK in the head and knocking him backward! I've been to the spot! A man could stand (did stand) in it very comfortably, and walked out to the other side of the overpass into a wooded area. The sewer is directly beneath the 'grassy knoll'. When the shots were fired the smoke rose giving bystanders the false impression that the shots were fired from behind the knoll.
@@MajorWolfgangHochstetter What I asked is, if Oswald were the shooter, full stop, then why didn't he shoot as the car was at a crawl right below him, I would think, a much easier shot.
@@MajorWolfgangHochstetter Interesting - but I think the last shot came from behind the fence at the grassy knoll. The gunmen who fired that shot had secret service credentials - he threw the gun into the trunk of his car after he shot Kennedy and flashed his credentials to anyone who questioned him.
Oswald could have easily reversed his position at the window ( IF it was Oswald ) and taken those shots at Kennedy as he came down Houston Street ...Those would have been much easier shots. But the conspiritors had to wait until Kennedy got in the exact position in Dealy Plaza in order to open up on Kennedy from different directions. This isn't really rocket science, folks.
Men Who Killed Kennedy is an hilarious joke made by paranoid and gullible producers who swallowed every crackpot conspiracy theory told to them and which gives loads of screen time to *demosntrable* liars, grifters and con artists like Robert Groden, Bev Oliver, Gordon Arnold, Jim Garrison, Jean Hill, etc.
An unrelated unfortunate coincidence of course.( That no one talks about) LBJ's illegitimate son and a few other "undesirables" in the Dallas area also died from a "fast spreading cancer" in this same time period. There is a video somewhere suggesting that this "cancer" was caused by an "injection"
@@artsyjean so you dont think Ruby was fed LSD while in jail? AND you think Ruby suddenly got a fast spreading cancer from the stress of being in jail? Do you also think Ruby was not told to kill oswald? Do you think Ruby acted alone out of concern for the country?? AND of course the Zapruder film was not hacked by the FBI? AND you want me to believe the BACK of JFK's head was blown off by a bullet that entered from the REAR?
Did you know LBJ resigned from his job as Navy intelligence leader immediately upon being sworn in? Military intelligence and the military industrial complex were tied to each other
I still remember the day before watching the noon news talking about Dallas. I 100% KNEW the bubble should have been on the Lincoln. I was a month before my 10th BD.
Book is packed with fabrications and Lane was a total con artist, demonstrably so. Witnesses like Charles Brehm called him "a despicable liar" and John Connally "evil." He was soundly condemned by the investigation for misleading them with conspiracy theories he couldn't back up with evidence. He disgusted interview subjects by twisting their words. Don't miss Bob Katz's Mother Jones article "Mark Lane - The Left's Leading Hearse Chaser."
Ruby had a favor to return & it was killing Oswald, who definitely did not kill JFK, no matter how the commission diluted & disheveled the truth by omitting the Grassy Knoll shooter who blew the skull off JFK with a close range side shot & also vigorously pinning it on an innocent man located 300' behind where a high power close range direct side shot was an impossibility. This country or whatever is left of it should exonerate Oswald of this dubious distinction and either give up the guilty party if known or leave it as unknown/unsolved to get this historical scourge against Oswald removed.
Oswald I think got a shot off but I don’t think it was the kill shot remember other people were also hit and I’m not just talking about the governor also I question who killed jd Tippett too
Several things are either distorted or just flat out ignored that prove that 1) there was more than one shooter, and 2) Oswald was not one of the shooters. This does not mean that I believe that Oswald was not involved. I am quite convinced that Oswald was involved, but just was not one of the shooters. 90 seconds - The first officer to breach the Book Depository immediately recognized the shots as gunfire when others were still questioning if it was fireworks. It took that officer 90 seconds from the final shot to find Oswald in the 2nd floor cafeteria. There is no way physically possible that Oswald made it from the 6th floor sniper nest to the 2nd floor cafeteria in 90 seconds; especially when taking into account that the spent cartridges were found neatly side by side on the window sill; the rifle had no fingerprints meaning that it had to be thoroughly wiped down; and he had to cross the building from the sniper nest to the stairs and again from the stairs to the cafeteria, utilized the soda machine, and open the Coca-Cola that he was drinking when found. Brain matter on trunk - everyone has seen the footage of the headshot that ends with Jackie on the trunk and Agent Clint Hill climbing on the back of the car and ushering her back into the seats. According to the Warren Report, there were 4 testimonies explaining why Jackie was on the trunk. The testimonies were from Clint Hill, Jackie, and the motorcycle cops on either side of presidential limo. All 4 testimonies made the same claim, that Jackie was on the trunk to retrieve brain matter. The laws of physics dictate that if shot from behind, the brain matter would have been found in the front seat of the limo, not on the trunk. Flurry of shots - Both agents in the front seat of the lime testified that they heard a flurry of bullets passing overhead at the time of the headshot. The word flurry indicates not one, but multiple shots fired at almost the exact same time. Multiple shots mean multiple shooters. 3 shots? - The one thing that we hear over and over is that there were only 3 shots. One round was the "magic" bullet that hit both JFK and Gov Connelly. A second was the bullet fragments from the head wound, and the third disintegrated on the pavement when it missed the target. However, new evidence has come about that the head wound fragments may have come from as many as 3 different rounds (www.sciencedaily.com/releases/2007/05/070517142528.htm). And the entire case of how many rounds is based on audio evidence. What this evidence fails to take into account is the lack of acoustics from additional rifles that possibly could have utilized silencers. For those who want to argue against silencers, the silencer was invented by Hiram Maxim JR, the son of the inventor of the modern machine gun, in 1901, and silencers were well available in the 1960s. This is just a short listing of evidence that disproves Oswald being a lone gunman. An entire book can be written about how the evidence does not add up to Oswald being a gunman at all or even acting alone. The only thing the evidence can prove is Oswald's involvement, but none of it can prove that he even fired a single shot. I personally believe that he was involved based on 2 key pieces of evidence, 1) the rifle found near the sniper's nest was indeed his, and 2) his statement that he was a patsy, if he wasn't involved, he would have said that he was a scapegoat not a patsy. However, I have yet to see any explanation of the evidence that would convince me that he even fired a shot or acted alone.
Young Oswald could easily have made it down to the lunch room in the time he had. Blood and brain matter went in all directions, splattering everyone further ahead in the car. "Flurry of shots" is mighty vague. Most witnesses, including journalists, people on the lower floors of the TSBD, etc., firmly heard exactly three shots. There is no known audio recording of the assassination. The dictabelt recording was discredited and found to be invalid forty years ago. Seriously. have you done *any* research in this case?
@@aaronz7056 You are full of it... you are only taking into account the dissention of 4 flights of stairs. Let's look at ALL of what had to happen to fit the evidence if Oswald was a lone gunman! 1) The elevators were not working, so he had to use the stairs. 2) The stairs were on the opposite side of the building that the sniper nest. 3) the entire floor was filled with pallets of books that he would have had to navigate (no straight-line distance from the nest to the stairs). 4) The casings were found on the windowsill neatly placed side by side (it would have taken time for him to find the ejected casings and line them up). 5) no fingerprints found on the rifle which means that he would have had to take the time to wipe the rifle down. 6) The entrance to the cafeteria was in the middle of the building, meaning that he would have had to cross half the building from the stairs. 7) he would have had to have done this without being seen which was impossible because there were 2 women on the stairs and multiple people on the 2nd floor, all of whom said that they never saw him during that timeframe! THERE IS NO WAY POSSIBLE FOR ALL OF THIS TO HAVE HAPPENED IN 90 SECONDS! That is unless you somehow think that Oswald had the magic capability to defy the laws of physics!
@@frankpesco7723 It was Prescott Bush and Dulles, George H. W as a nobody back then but had connections to the CIA through his uncle. Prescott Bush and Dulles were business partners before and friends. JFK blamed the entire Bay of Pigs on Dulles. Bush and Dulles wanted revenge and that’s what they got. Oswald was just a fall guy someone they used though their connections with their various off shore business including the ones they had in Cuba.
A shot from a storm drain in front of the motorcade is the ONLY way the head went back and to the left, PERIOD. Studied it for years and to have them want us to believe that a man fired 3 shot off hand from a 6.5 Carano crutch on a moving target with 2 hits in under 9 seconds is laughable.
I BELIEVE THERE WERE 4 SHOOTERS :: ONE BELOW OSWALD ' S SUPPOSED FLOOR , OSWALD 'S FLOOR WAS A SET UP , THE SEWER , THE FENCE BY THE RAILROAD , AND THE BUILDING DIRECTLY BEHIND THE MOTORCADE THE MOMENT THE SHOTS WERE FIRED ❗️ WHOM EVER PLANNED THIS , THERE WERE MANY INVOLVED SND THEY WANTED TO BE CERTAIN KENNEDY WAS HIT & DEAD ❗️ I BELIEVE THEY ALSO INVOLVED IN VARIOUS NEFARIOUS WAYS VIA COMPARTMENTALIZING , SEPARATING ALL FROM KNOWING EACH OTHER , EXCEPT FOR EXAMPLE THAT THE POLICE DEPARTMENT ALL KNEW RUBY & POSSIBLY LATER REALIZED CERTSIN CONNECTIONS BUT AS LOCAL CORRUPTED POLICE DEPARTMENTS ARE WERE AFRAID TO SAY SOMETHING TO LINK OTHERS TO SUSPICIOUS ACTIVITIES OR WRONG DOINGS
AND I BELIEVE WITH CERTAINY THAT OSWALD DID NOT SHOOT ANY RIFLE AND WHEN HE SUDDENLY REALIZED HE WAS BEING OBVIOUSLY SET UP & THAT THE POLICE WERE PART OF THE MOB HE TOOK EVASIVE ACTIONS AND UNTIL HE WAS SUBDUED & BEAT UP HE AGAIN AS HE WAS TAKEN OUT OF THE HOLDING AREA WITH SHOCK REALIZED THIS WAS THE MOMENT HE WAS FORCED TO BE SUBJECT TO BE A STATIONARY (( A TUNNEL OF FEAR )) TARGET FOR SOMEBODY (( RUBY ))
I concur with you100% There is another on this thread who states the same as our views on that fatal shot and i said he was the only one who is correct.until i saw your comment. I to have studied this for many years Perfect place ,perfect angle and great hiding spot even the people on the steps say "they smelled and saw gun smoke reachinh them" (And where is the drain? Right below the steps.) The Shooter was Johnny Roselli .
''Jack Ruby: Everything pertaining to what's happening has never come to the surface. The world will never know the true facts, of what occurred, my motives. The people had, that had so much to gain and had such an ulterior motive for putting me in the position I'm in, will never let the true facts come above board to the world."
If anyone saw a film clip or photo of Jack Ruby from behind, as I have, they would be absolutely positive that the man that shot Oswald was not Jack Ruby. Jack Ruby had a duck tail (tapered) hairline at the collar. The shooter has a square cut hairline. Also. Immediately after Oswald was shot the shooter was surrounded to conceal his identity the dozens of cameras and video films that were all focused on the action, yet no one managed to capture an image of the shooter's face. Then immediately after the shooting, the police collected all of the films as 'evidence' and only released the films that the public are allowed to see. Interestingly, immediately after Oswald was shot, while the shooter was surrounded, he continued shooting, yet no one else was injured. This means that the shooter was firing blanks. Immediately, after Oswald was 'shot' he was taken back inside the police department and later, when he is finally brought out, he is subconscious, so he could not talk to reporters. When an autopsy is performed on Oswald it reveals that he was shot in the heart. Although, if you compare the films and photos of the moment that Oswald was supposedly shot, the gun is pointed at his stomach. Oswald was actually shot by the man that got into the ambulance with him.
I looked in Marrs' book Crossfire, and it's possible that the body of Oswald who was autopsied was not Oswald. The autopsy report had no mention of any identifying scars on the body from his military records. It's possible that Oswald had doppelgängers, including the one in the grave, which was never exhumed for identification.
I also think that it's possible Oswald was not shot at all. He was wearing a white T-shirt, which would have easily shown blood from the wound, but at the last minute, he was wearing a dark knit sweater. So there would be no visible evidence of any wound, and Oswald could possibly have been shot with blanks.
@@bobholtzmann The man that everyone thinks was Oswald was an imposter. That is why the man did not have the identifying scars noted in Oswald's military records. The real Oswald probably died during his military service, then military intelligence used his identity for the person everyone thinks is Oswald who was autopsied.
@@robertperry4439 Very interesting stuff -- I'm beginning to see this man playing Oswald as a military operative being taken out of public awareness through a staged event, very much like that shooting scene at Mount Rushmore in Hitchock's movie North By Northwest - it's almost like they used the film as a playbook.
One thing I can't get out of my head is how close to Jackie that last shot was. Mere inches away from her face. I've always wondered how it affected her. I would've soiled my clothes for sure. The killers were ruthless since they had to know if they missed, they could've hit her.
@@youtuber5305 No, I believe it was a rifle. The still picture taken by Mary Moorman, after years of studying and magnifying, shows "badgeman" at the exact moment of the kill shot. After all these years, there are so many books, documentaries and studies of 1q/22/1963, it is now ludicrous to me to believe Oswald killed Kennedy or even fired a shot. The Warren Commission Report is a fictional tale.
For years I was involved in compatition shooting. My friends and I had purchased some Italian Carcano's rifles, the same kind Oswald supposedly used. Thay we're new in the crate. I did tot think much of them. In fact I thought thay we're the most generic gun I ever saw. Well put all aside we took them to the range. What junk. Nobody could hit anything. It was a quest to get this gun to hit what I was trying to hit. I was defeated . I gave up. What a piece of junk.
I have nothing against Italian,s. My wife is off the boat Italian. But facts are facts. Not one of the 10 rifles would group at 100 yards. And 100 yards is a starting standard for center fire rifles. We also had British, Russian, Swiss, and German WW2 rifles, with war surplus ammo. Thay all shot with much accuracy.
I saw a meticulously researched documentary on British TV some 7 or 8 years back. The maker had high resolution audio analysis which discerned the number of shots, I THINK, it was 3, In 6 seconds? Anyhow, He then hired the current best USA competition rifle marksmen, equipped them with the exact model of rifle said to be the 1 used by Oswald. None of them got anywhere close to the number of shots in that timescale due to the reloading and refocusing accuracy required. It concluded that all the shots came from more than 1 source. Further research demonstrated the 1st shot hit the tarmac, the 2nd entered the car and struck an official and exited his arm at the elbow. The 3rd shot hit Kennedy's head from behind. The documentary maker interviewed and analysed film of including the pathologist at the establishment Kennedy was rushed to. The pathology lab man said a lot of brain was still within the shattered skull, it had lots of fragments of what in his experience were DumDum bullets. Then, Secret Service agents burst into the lab and removed him from the scene. When he was allowed back in, Kennedy's brain had been removed, but he noticed there were still some bullet fragments in the skull. Oswalds rifle did not have that type of bullet according to the shells found at his position. It was possited that only Secret Service personnel were routinely armed with that type of ammunition. The pathology lab man surmised the brain removal was to cover up the presence of DumDum bullet fragments. Further analysis of film footage of the scene, showed Secret Service agents piling out of the following security limo when the shooting started. A discharge of a weapon by one of the egressing agents was clearly seen. That is what it was said, struck Kennedy's head, killing him. It was subsequently found, that the agent had not had the safety catch engaged on his weapon, which ACCIDENTALLY discharged and by a fluke the bullet hit Kennedy. The agent who fired the fatal accidental shot was named in the documentary, but I cannot remember his name. He was removed from Secret Service duties and demoted to Traffic duties until his retirement. Thus it was said, the Secret Service knew it was a terrible accident and an immediate cover up to remove/ change/fabricate evidence was enacted to prevent loss of face and confidence. This documentary was shown on British TV ,Channel 4 in ???? 2013 14 15 16. Don't recall exactly which of those years. It may be possible to find the documentary online?
Zero proof?.. lol.. Ok, explain to me why or where Oswald discarded his jacket that afternoon?.. And why was his jacket found stuffed under a car in the same Texaco parking lot WE KNOW the killer of Officer Tippit was in too!.. lol.. That jacket hangs Oswald’s ass as a cop killer..
I’m not sold on the official story, and never really was. But c’mon……….no proof? There was plenty of proof. There was loads of it. I don’t know what kind of bulls*** you’ve been reading.
Take off the tin hat, leave the attic and breath fresh air. Oswald owned the rifle that was left on the 6th floor, where he worked that day. Oswald was the only employee not to return to work after the motorcade. Oswald's wife, who is still alive, admits she took the photo of him holding the rifle in their backyard. That's the same photo that so many attic and basement dwellers, insist is fake.
Oswald did his best to remain silent on his CIA/FBI connections and involvement. He kept saying he was waiting for someone to "come forward and provide legal assistance". I think he was wondering why his handlers hadn't cleared the whole matter up already behind closed doors. So when he said, "I'm just a patsy", I believe he misspoke. I believe he meant to use the word "scapegoat", because he had been in Russia. Ironically, a patsy was precisely what he actually was.
Oswald didn't say one word about any conspiracy to his family, to any cop, or to a TV audience of millions. There is no evidence he was part of any conspiracy or had any "handlers." Watch the entire clip and he only says he's a patsy in relation to being hassled by the cops for having lived in Russia, not because he thinks a coup is sacrificing him as the assassin of the President.
@@aaronz7056 If Oswald had been part of a CIA op designed to stage an ATTEMPTED assassination on Kennedy and tie the weapon to Cuba (which it did), an op that somehow went wrong, WOULD Oswald have told his family, a cop or a TV audience? No. He would have done what he did, stay silent (for the time being) and plead for help.
My F-I-L always said he was innocent based on the "death walk" that was broadcast of Ruby shooting Oswald . When I asked why he thought that his response was , "When Oswald stepped out of the doorway he scanned the crowd as he was moving , saw someone that he obviously recognized and his whole demeanor changed . He knew he would not make it through that crowd ." Well we all know who shot him so .......... makes a person ask what ties were between whoever he saw (Ruby ?) , himself and how Ruby figured into it .... wouldnt it ?
Oswald was already aware that he was a dead man walking...That's why he cried out, "I'M JUST A PATSY" . Most people would have said , I'm innocent, I didn't do this, but Oswald specifically said he was a Patsy because when he realized it was him , and only him, that was going down for the assassination , he knew he wasn't long for this world . I think it even surprised Oswald how quickly THEY had gotten to him ...But it had to be quick, VERY QUICK, in order to assure that no one else would be implicated in the assassination . THEY succeeded MAGNIFICENTLY , which is a clear sign that people in power were behind it all. Oswald saying that he was a patsy , Ruby saying that he wanted to be taken to Washington to reveal things....These were CLUES that much more went on here than what the public was being told ...Strange that nobody was listening.
There are no doubt multiple theories about the shooting, but I'm beginning to see sense in the idea that it was all staged, just like the movie North By Northwest in the cafeteria of Mount Rushmore. It's too convenient to have all those cameras rolling in front of the actual shooting, and yet it's unclear who did the shooting, because everyone is rushed away the moment it's over. I have a theory that the CIA / FBI didn't like Oswald being held in custody by the Dallas Police, and putting pressure on him to confess, and even hitting them. So they staged the shooting, and might even have used blanks, because they put a dark sweater on Oswald to hide the absense of blood.
Paraffin test is an old police technique. Oswald would have had to have been wearing gloves up to his elbows. Pre-disposing the test was done correctly and on Oswald.
Hello Frank. Perhaps you're right. Why would George Herbert Walker Bush want the Kennedys dead? I am reading David Lifton's Best Evidence, Disguise and Deception in the Assassination of John F. Kennedy. The Warren Commission's 26 volume findings seem like a joke. But why Bush? Thanks for your consideration.
@@scottykay1116 I have a pic from the 1950's of Prescott Bush putting a hat on Richard Nixon with Jack Rubenstein ( Jack Ruby ) standing next to Nixon. There is also a pic of Bush standing outside the TSBD minutes after JFK was killed. Bush head of covert operations and highest ranking CIA member left after JFK fired the top three. -Skull and Bones. Zapruder was Mossad. That is just a start.
Even when Oswald was going through the "red tape" to bring his Russian wife to America, his process was expedited and unusually smooth for a common soldier. The resulting hatred for the name Oswald was so great after Kennedy's assassination that even elementary primers erased innocent stories from them that carried the cursed name.
@Michael Franklin: Notice how official immediately used all three parts of his name...Lee Harvey Oswald. It's a psychological trick to convince people there's only one suspect. I seriously doubt Lee Harvey Oswald, John Wilkes Booth, or James Earl Ray went by, or preferred to be addressed by their first, middle, and last names.
@@youtuber5305 That's kind of my point. As a patsy, Oswald was already being used by our government. I'm not saying he was innocent or not involved on 11/22/1963.
Might as well forget all about the windshield with the bullet hole in it that the Secret Service ordered to be destroyed at Dearborn, Mi three days after the assassination. Like the people pointing at the grassy knoll, they didn't accept the Beast's story. Even the doctors who saw Kennedy's head wounds were threatened if they talked to the media. A magic bullet? You've got to be kidding. The cop's Dictaphone says otherwise.
Exactly. The policman on the motorcycle behind the limo to the left was hit with blood spatter and brain matter. Jackie jumped on the trunk to gather JFK's brain and when she got to Parkland, she handed it to one of the surgeons either McClellan, the chief surgeon, or Crenshaw. Morbid.
The evidence that proves who the parties were that were actually involved has been released for quite some time now. Why more people aren't aware of it is a bit odd.
What evidence is that?.. It’s been almost 60 years and I haven’t seen one piece of direct evidence indicating a conspiracy?.. Not one piece.. Nothing..
If Oswald was who they say he was he would have shot when the vehicles were approaching him. He would not have known if he had another shot with the vehicles going away from him especially with the guards in the vehicle behind Kennedy.
If Oswald shot at the limo while it was approaching him on Houston it would have quickly sped up and gone past him. On Elm it could only go forward and remain in his gunsights for a longer time. Also, the Secret Service would have instantly known exactly where the shots were coming from. Oswald was mad but he wasn't stupid.
G. Gordon Liddy shot Tippit and he botched it. He was supposed to shoot him in the back of the head but got excited and tried to copy the way he had been told JFK was shot. If Charles Nicolette had succeeded in a one shot head shot of JFK from behind Tibbit would not have been killed. What they needed was both a body with a head shot from behind for a lone gunman story and a 100% dead Kennedy. What they had was a dead president with wounds from three different directions so Tippit was supposed to have the "proper" wounds and be switched with JFK.
I wish Oswald had blabbed away and said how he was framed. He was probably a cia informant and was so loyal that he thought he would be saved. A true patsy. I used to think he was one of the shooters but I no longer do.
Asked point blank on live TV if he shot Kennedy, he doesn't make the slightest attempt to blurt out one word about any conspiracy clearly sacrificing him and instead just gives a hollow, rambling reply that all but dodges the question just before complaining the cop he was caught red-handed trying to shoot having had the nerve to hit him.
What if the reason Ruby was selected was he already knew about the cancer. This was 1963 and what if his doctors at the time estimated that he had less than 1 year to live. What if knowing he was on his way out he traded the Oswald hit job for a favor? That he lived for 4 years might be due to a slow moving cancer that his doctors at the time hadn't experienced.
I heard about that -- while the President's limousine was parked, several members of the press saw a hole in the windshield, before the Secret Service drove it away from the hospital.
It was on the tomorrow show with TomSnyder the original,however I definitely think the deep state killed him but the tape could be controlled opposition if it doesn't show the facts and adds confusion.
Even worse, the time line of the President's shooting is tied to that publicly known Zapruder clip, which runs at about 17 frames per second. Abraham Zapruder's camera had a setting of 24 frames per second, which from a film projector would run at slow motion. So what we see in the Zapruder film is a slow motion film, cut to run at regular speed, with lots and lots of frames missing, because it's a heavily edited reprint, and the original, if still existing, is in CIA storage.
The unaltered Zapruder film has never been released. The released version also does NOT show the limo slowing at all. But, the film taken from across the street shows the limo's brake lights were on, and it came to almost a complete dead stop, before the final head shot. Why did the Agent STOP, instead of flooring it, when gunshots were ringing out??? He only dropped the hammer AFTER the final lethal head shot was administered. Proof??? There is NO WAY a Secret Service agent could have jumped off the following car's running board, instantly accelerated, and ran towards the limo catching it... if they were all going 15 MPH, as the limo driver stated. He would have fell flat on his face the second his first shoe hit the pavement. A extremely fit, well trained, runner MIGHT have been able. But, after being out drinking half the night??? And, wearing dress street shoes??? Yeah... don't think so. Plus, the limo was already accelerating as he was chasing it. There are NOT very many people that can run 20-25 MPH in a suit and dress shoes.....................................
@@donf3877 I noticed the film from the other side facing the grassy knoll - the limo did slow down, although that too was edited. The driver slowed the car before turning his head to see what was going on - and the brief slowdown would have been the opportunity for the SS agent to jump on the car. It's little known that President's limo had another stop before the fatal stretch of road - the car could not make the sharp turn, so stopped, backed up and turned in front of the Texas Book Depository, literally under the 6th floor window. But of course, there was a wait for the car to reach the area in front of the grassy knoll, where all of the crossfire occurred from the Dal-Tex, the grassy knoll, the railroad bridge, School Book Depository, and who know where else.
"There is a photograph out there showing Oswald in a completely different place when Kennedy was shot." No there isn't. There are two photos that I know of which have been mistakenly claimed to show Oswald. The Altgens photo is one of them, and the man shown in that photo who has been most frequently claimed to be Oswald was irrefutably proven way back in the 1970s to have actually been Billy Lovelady. You are repeating an old, old conspiracy myth that was conclusively debunked more than forty years ago, but which is still today mindlessly regurgitated by some people who have done nothing even remotely similar to proper research on this subject.
The evening of Nov 22 at the press conference at police headquarters, the police chief explaining Oswalds background mentions that LHO was involved with the Cuban Fair play organization. A voice from the back corrects him saying it was the Fair Play for Cuba group. The Tv camera had swung to the back and appeared to show Ruby as the one correcting the police chief. If it truly was Ruby who said that how would a Dallas nightclub operator have known that detail? Had it been announced earlier in the day on the news?
By midnight the day of the assassination the suspect's (Oswald) background, arrest record, etc. had had plenty of time to be looked into by investigators and the media. Oswald's "committee" had already been reported on well before the press conference and in any case several people actually called this out to D.A. Wade, not just Ruby.
@@aaronz7056 I thought it was the captain not DA Wade, might be wrong. However with Oswalds questionable background becoming evident there undoubtedly were concerns where the investigation was going to lead. Any implication of pro Castro Cubans or Soviets would have lead to a very dicey situation, even the Soviets would have been nervous that they would be blamed and what the retaliation would be. If Ruby was assigned to silence Oswald the story could be wrote in a way that nuclear war would be averted.
@@craigstanley3680 If the authorities wanted to silence Oswald they could have killed him behind closed doors or in his cell and made up any story they liked instead of a public execution on live TV that couldn't look fishier and would just raise suspicions of a conspiracy. Nobody would ever select an unstable blabbermouth with violent mood swings as their "hit man," especially one who throws away his first chance to get his target at the press conference, and who hangs around in line in a Western Union office on a minor errand long after his target was already supposed to have been transferred away.
I always thought it was interesting that when they asked Jackie if she wanted to get out of her bloody dress, she refused and stated “I want the world to see what THEY did.”
It was a coup and Truman knew it and wrote the Dec. 22,1963 anti-CIA letter to the editor of the Washington Post. Remember, Truman fprmed the CIA but found out the bunch of murderers they became! That's why he wrote the letter to the Post and they printed it a month after JFK's murder! It was a coup!
@@garyblubaugh2517 I thought it was if he sent troops to Vietnam, but I'm going by a scene in the movie, "JFK". I did read about his helicopter and that he was more "affluent" during his campaign than his opponent (can't remember the name), I believe for Senator that he evidently cheated the other guy out of, but my memory is vague.
@@susanmattinglyhatfield9036 Research before assuming something is correct. Daddy Bush was the head guy in Dallas of FBI as well. Was a well conceived cover up of future high level politicians, DOD, mob and Cuban leaders IMO
No difference between then and now. The powerful are going to do what they want. Everyone knows it and there’s nothing to be done but to “don’t worry, be happy”.
I have seen the 2 retired secret servicemen who were closest to Kennedy interviewed. No way they said. Oswald did it. Its never been explained how Oswald could have got off the 2 shots that were almost simultaneusly.
@@mikealvord55 Sigh... anybody reading this: just watch the film, assuming it's playing at a realistic speed, count the seconds between JFK and Connally looking around on hearing the first shot [which is what Connally said he did] and the first actual wounding, then count the seconds between the first actual wounding and the fatal head shot, and decide for yourself.
"Those boys on the Grassy Knoll were in unmarked graves outside Terlingua within two hours of Kennedy being shot." How do you know? "I still have the shovel."
@@daffydlwellen1270 Of course--! However, i do confront this nonsense when I hear it every time. It is important to accept well-enough established facts. There's a world to save !
@@daffydlwellen1270 In everyday life, I also deal with the made-up facts in an opposing way, most of the time. Conspiracy crazies are everywhere. Many of them also believe in Bigfoot. All the ideas are wrong, lacking in honest research; just repeated fairy tales. This includes the idiot 911 truthers.
Oswalds finger prints were never found on the Carcano rifle. A partial palm print was found on the gun AFTER his death. Would he have time to wipe down the rifle and get down to the lunchroom before the cop and supervisor showed up?
They have sworn testimony of mortician at the funeral home where Oswald body was at the fbi came and took palm print of Oswald by placing Oswald’s hand on stock of rifle.
When the eight (8) shots were fired on November 22, 1963, Lee Oswald was standing in front of the School Book Depository toward the left corner of the building. Look around ... there's a PIC of him at that location. Investigations could never create a timeline for Oswald to get from the 6th floor to the 2nd floor where he was observed by an officer. That's because they were working it backwards. Had they worked it where Oswald was coming from the street, the timeline would have reconciled. But then again, they had already assigned Oswald as the shooter even before a shot was fired.
@@michaelcamuso5437 Michael, I did some work for the people who were directly involved. Forget what you think you know. 1st shot fired vertical from atop the SBD to launch roosting pigeons on the Hertz and Chevrolets (yes Chevrolets sign, look at the photo, it's the only time you will ever see that sign spelled that way, ever). The shot was fired to draw attention to the open window by street viewers. It was fired from a 1911 Colt Commander. The .45 ACP bullet was retrieved the next day from the lawn across from the SBD. 2nd shot fired from the left opening of the railroad trestle by Charlie Harrelson. The bullet went through the windshield of the Limo just below the rear view mirror, then through JFK's throat. 3rd shot fired from the Daltex Building across Houston St. from the SBD completely missed its target and hit the curb. 4th shot hit JFK in the middle of the back. Fired from the Daltex Building. 5th shot hit John Connolly. Daltex Bldg. 6th shot hit John Connolly. Daltex Bldg. 7th & 8th shots: 7th shot hit JFK in the back of the head. It was fired from the Daltex building. 8th shot hit JFK in the right front of the head. The impact of shots 7 & 8 are within 8/10 second apart. It was fired from the Grassy Knoll by Jim Files using a scoped .221 Fireball. The bullet had been drilled and filled with liquid mercury to generate hydro-shock. After firing, Files ejected the shell casing, bit down on it, and tossed it across the fence. This is a trademark of Jim Files, and the bullet was found at the site, with the bite mark. Now: The SBD. On the 6th floor, there were three people. In the open window were a man with black skin and Malcolm Wallace (LBJ's personal assassin, you can read about him). Wallace was photo ID'ed by two witnesses upon leaving the building. The 3rd man was positioned at the opposite end of the building as a shooter, but did not fire as he had no shot opportunity. Now: The Zapruder Film. Think you've seen it? Look again, closely. Try to see the back of JFK's head. You can't. It's been blacked out (look close). Likely only 10 people have ever seen the actual footage. The government paid $150,000 for it from the Zapruder family (via Look Magazine). Now: There was yesterday, today, and tomorrow. From this day forward, never under any circumstance believe "anything" your government tells you.
@@michaelcamuso5437 Of course. Finding out what actually happened then is not, and was not difficult at the time. In New Orleans, they were actually quite open about Project Big Event. After "W" dies, lots of information will be forthcoming. Remember, W was one of the 4 US Presidents in Dealy Plaza that day.
I have been watching stuff on the JFK assasination for a long time and literally just saw that video a few days ago! I already 100% believed it was a conspiracy, they had everything planned out to the smallest detail.
If Oswald did it alone... then there would have been no need to silence him..
Oswald acted alone, thought he had been set up. Which is where the "Patsy" comes from and yes he was silenced because of what Oswald saw from the sixth floor window. Lee knew what had actually happened, Ruby carried out his job to perfection and the American public has no damn business knowing the truth. You have a good day sir.
@@markdelgado8963 An absolutely enormous amount of evidence of conspiracy before, during and after the assassination. You can literally go down any of the various rabbit trails and quickly realize that "coincidence' doesnt apply here
A maintenance man said he saw Oswald eating lunch downstairs while it happened - he was never questioned by the Warren Commission. Of course, the Warren Commission is a neat package, that makes you believe only certain things.
Bullshit--good riddance.
They say the RFK ASSASSIANTION WAS A CONSPIRACY BUT NO ONE SILENCED SIRHAN SIRHAN...
I am British living in England and I was 17 at the time of the assassination. The very minute I saw on the news that Ruby had killed Oswald, even as a teenager, I never believed that Oswald did it, and certainly not that he was working alone. Nothing that came out later about who Ruby was, and nothing in the decades since have altered my mind. Quite the contrary.
That makes no sense; "I never believed that Oswald did it, and certainly not that he was working alone.": First you say he didn't do it, then you say he did but not alone.
Wouldn't it make more sense that someone shot Oswald because he HAD done it? Why shoot him if he hadn't?
@@peterfraser9070 Because he was the patsy, got to take out the patsy.
@@KennethPoole-y7z because he said, "they (the police) have taken me in because of the fact that I've lived in the Soviet Union - I'm just a patsy"?
Same here. Exactly!
At the age of 89 I never believed the Warren Commission, at the time or now, and I never met anyone who did believe it. Ruby was extremely well known by every local cop as the local head of the mafia. Yet he got into Police headquarters armed.
I'm 75 and I believe the Warren Commission. I actually read it 15 years ago. Those who say they don't believe the Commission's report never read the damn thing. I retired early and had lots of time on my hands. The volumes of the Report were difficult to wade through, but those investigators were very thorough. We know now that they did not cover all the possible bases, but what committee does?
@@Dr.Pepper001 I've been studying the JFK killing for 40 yrs and the Warren commission was a bunch of garbage and yes I've read it myself..and seen interviews.. archive footage.read almost everything about this subject and I can tell this commission was formed to cover up this great tragedy LBJ himself didn't believe a word of it.and neither does 85% of the American people to this day..you keep right on drinking the government Kool aid sir !!!
@@Dr.Pepper001 I'm a natural born skeptic, as kid I questioned everything from the church I attended to the politicians running for office. I'm 60. One day, about 10 or 12 years of age, I asked my dad about the JFK assassination and that I sincerely thought the shooter could in no way have fired off 3 shots in 6 seconds and hit JFK's head in a moving car with that rifle. I knew about the rifle because my dad told me about it and also we used to go target practice a lot with my brothers, my dad owned a few rifles, I knew a little about guns , anyway, long story short, he said he felt strongly that the Warren Commission was a cover up, that it didn't sit well with him.
I have not read it, but have read a couple of books on the subject.
Probably the main reason I didn't read through the drudgery, that is the Warren Report, is because of one man...Allen Dulles. And I think you know why.
Sir, the fix was in.
"It is the first responsibility of every citizen to question authority"
- Benjamin Franklin
@@alwagner9722 -- There were 3 shots in 6 seconds. Oswald had the rifle cocked with a round in the chamber by the time JFK rounded the corner. He aimed in on his target and pulled the trigger. That was the 1st shot. It's at that precise second that the 6 seconds begin. He only has 2 more rounds to fire over those 6 seconds, not 3 rounds. He cocks the rifle again, aims, and fires the 2nd round. He cocks again, aims, and fires the 3rd round. At that precise instant, the 6 seconds end. Most people say to themselves, "In 6 seconds he had to cock, aim, and fire the rifle 3 times during those 6 seconds." No, he didn't. He had to cock, aim, and fire 2 times. I was in the Marines from 1964 to 1968. I trained and qualified at the rifle range with the M-14, which fired in the semiautomatic mode. Oswald had a bolt action rifle that, like the M-14, was a fairly high powered rifle. It had recoil so after each shot he needed about a second to get the rifle scope cross hairs back on target. It was definitely possible for him to fire off 3 rounds in 6 seconds. After I left the Corps I bought a Mauser bolt action rifle. I took it to a rifle range near Salt Lake City and duplicated what Oswald did. Using the same scenario as I described above, I hit a stationary target 3 times in 6 seconds. Don't tell me it's not possible.
@@alwagner9722
Oh Lord.. Somebody from the intelligence community was gonna be on that commission.. So, what’s the problem?.. lol..
I’d give weight to that gripe if I didn’t know for a fact you guys would be suspicious of whoever made it on that commission from the intelligence community.. Because you’re crackpots..
Doesn't matter who actually pulled the trigger, our Intelligence Community was responsible. Either directly or in their failure to prevent it. So they are either corrupt or incompetent, in any case they need to be stripped of their duties and we should start over. Our Federal law enforcement is rotten to the core, current events are proving this true.
True
Matt Ruby was part of the Jewish Mafia. JFK was opposed to Israel developing nuclear weapons and sympathetic to the plight of the Palestinians. Incompetence doesn't come into it. They wanted him gone !
Yes, it DOES matter who actually pulled the trigger. It matters a lot, otherwise this crime will never be solved.
Ditto
@@Joylibelleagreed
How on earth does a man accused of killing a policeman and a president not have legal representation not to mention how does a guy just walk right thru security and kill Oswald in front of millions
And stalking him the whole time he was custody
Ruby was well known by the Dallas police dept. and not perceived as a threat at the time.
@@liljimlambert7According to the Wikipedia article on LEE HARVEY OSWALD:
- G. Robert Blakey, chief counsel for the House Select Committee on Assassinations from 1977 to 1979, said: "The most plausible explanation for the murder of Oswald by Jack Ruby was that Ruby had stalked him on behalf of organized crime, trying to reach him on at least three occasions in the forty-eight hours before he silenced him forever."[252]
@@JohnnyNation and I have plenty of swamp land to sell you in Florida if you believe the Warren report. It was a COUP !
@@haroldbrown5308 I never said I believed the Warren report/ I still think Oswald was the fatal shooter even if there were others involved.
Ruby just said why he killed Oswald, because of the people around him that would benefit from it and he would not be vindicated. This was just ONE of many cover-ups in the history of our government. This was 1963, how bad is it now??????
substantially worse now.
@@JGrogann YEP
I guess Ruby knew he was dying of cancer and so shot Oswald for the mafia and the CIA.
His family were prob well compensated.
@@grissom2023
that's seems likely, wonder if there is any evidence of such an occurrence, money in the Rubenstein (ruby) family or something like that.
Also possibly the CIA induced him with cancer to get rid of him. they couldn't very well have another prisoner shot, could they?
@@grissom2023 Probably
The greatest coverup in American history. Oswald himself said it best.... " I was a patsy".
(Almost) the greatest coverup in American history.
@@davidwoods358 How could I forget 2020?
Then who killed officer Tibbits ?
@@danielhartin7680 Spot on Sir !!
@@robertramberg8219 Oswald because the little Marxist was scared out of his damn mind. The reasons for which he was silenced by Ruby, because of what Oswald saw and knew. By the way, watch Ruby's assassination of Oswald. It is a textbook mob hit, as Ruby had been a foot soldier in both the Chicago and New Orleans mob. He was a seasoned killer, period. Which is why Ruby was ordered to silence Oswald and carried out the hit to perfection.
Ruby came down with a case of that mysterious fast-acting cancer which has plagued a number of other potential witnesses, government actors, people with close connections, and agent provocateurs; not only in this case ... but in a number of others, as well.
Nothing to see here, though, folks.
Let's not forget Martha Mitchell...wife of U.S. Attorney General John Mitchell during Watergate.....who claimed agents held her while she was forcibly given a shot. SHE then died of cancer soon after, just like what happened to victims described by Judy Vary Baker, the scientist who was supposedly Oswald's lover and who worked on the weaponization of virulent cancer to be used by the CIA. In the end, Watergate was about the Kennedy assassination and fear that the truth would come out.
Hilarious paranoia.
He was injected
(literally) nothing to read here folks, you mean
@@aaronz7056 maybe you should look up vaccines with SV40 in them or the fact laboratories use the metal nickel to give mice cancer.
Ruby had strong ties to the mob. Oswald wasn't just killed, he was silenced!
Silenced? About what? He didn't have a clue as to what was really going on except to perform an unprovable story that incriminated him along with a personal history that played into a pattern of being guilty.
The 'Times' proves it; the media hung him before ANY body was even cold yet.
And you have absolutely no evidence that the mob killed Oswald.
@@higbeedoug What a stupid question. Silenced about what??????
@@donjindra Show EXACTLY where the OP said mob silenced LHO. He just said there were ties and that's true. CIA works w. mob all the time. They're called 'assets'.
@@lukecage3569 There was a clear implication that the mob silenced LHO: "Ruby had strong ties to the mob. Oswald wasn't just killed, he was silenced!" Why mention the mob and silencing if there was no connection between the concepts? Of course that's what he meant.
Just looking at the parade route is a tip off that there was a conspiracy; open windows, a kink in the parade route, minimal secret service. I think it's interesting that at the first shot, Johnson hit the floor of his limo (when most people thought it was a firework) and Connelly exclaimed, "They're going to kill us all!" What did these men know?
they're: THEY'RE !!!....
@@johanconradie2120 Worry about the subject being discussed and not spelling as it makes you look like a Karen.
@@johanconradie2120 Another THEY'RE Stop telling the TRUTH" We want this Secret Kelp for Another 59 year's....
Everything.
I always wondered why they just didn't go straight through Dealey Plaza. But instead made a right turn, then a hard left in front of book depository.
Seems odd
Oh yeah, Ruby who had mob connections, who the Kennedy's back stabbed, was just so upset that someone killed Kennedy he had to go shoot him. I'm still amazed everyday at the stupidity of people.
Its not the mob you think of. It is the highest Mob of the land and the world even. Jacob Rubinstein was a member of the fraternity that killed JFK.
Same stpid MFR'S that believe 911 happened just because of some camal jockeys with box cutters.
Stupidity--please look who was freshman congressman Nixon's FIRST hire in l946--Jack Ruby! Nixon knew the mob and was sent to silence LHO on Sunday morning!
Exactly.
Exactly. The mob has a tough enough time keeping the Feds off their backs for the normal crimes they are involved in, do you think they are going kill the President? Dumb!
Poor Oswald was a deer in the headlights of history. I certainly believe him when he said "I didn't shoot anyone, no sir!" The media, as it turned out, was very selective in publicizing Ruby's comments. He was widely quoted as as saying he killed Oswald to spare Jackie a trial, but everything else he said - things like "If Adlai Stevenson was VP this whole thing wouldn't have happened" - were, of course, ignored.
That’s why Ruby killed him, not to silence him for any conspiracy but because most Americans would have shot him given half a chance.
Oswald shot and killed Officer Tippit in his desperate bid to escape, escape what?
Oswald fired the rifle from the window, ran down the stairs and blended in with the crowd.
Look at how conspiracy theories balloon, some comments here about 9/11 being a conspiracy too, complete madness.
Ruby stated clearly that it was a conspiracy. He said it was timed exactly by seconds. And if it was timed that way then someone in the police department I in guilty of telling me what time Oswald was coming down. And if it was a conspiracy then that little girl was a part of it.
Anyone know who that little girl was?
Karolyn Karlin.
@@paulflemming732 Ruby also "clearly stated" he could hear "Jews" being tortured in the cell next to his.
Let’s not forget that Dorothy Kilgallen was interviewing Jack Ruby about the assassination and she was found dead in her home under suspicious circumstances!!
As were many other people who knew information about the assasination.
Kilgallen is just another one of those coincidences in a VERY long line of coincidences concerning the JFK assassination...Why should any of us be so suspicious about it ?...Because our Spidey Senses are SCREAMING conspiracy, and have been for a long time now, that's why !
@@ronaldholmes8525 No doubt Ronald - this was a professional hit (Oswald just didn't get lucky) and was planned out in advance. People knew there was some very politically unhappy people in Texas so why would you have the President riding in an open car. No FBI in the buildings - none behind the fence in the grassy noel. Most FBI agents were out late getting drunk - a total screw up by those who were supposed to protect the President.
There was never any "interview" of Jack Ruby by Killgalen.
@@apointofinterest8574 exactly!!!
I was 13 years old, used to come home after school and when JFK did a news conference, it was pure joy- The day of the assassination is still one of the worst for this once teenager.
Just imagine if we knew in the Sixties we suffered a Coup?
same here!
For many of us, too. RFK also.
Ruby is a fascinating person. His mob connections are indisputable. He was an FBI informant. And all three agencies including the CIA and Secret Service were aware of Oswald and yet no one thought they should tail him on the day of the parade or have the windows shut on the parade route at the most obvious point. Either they are incompetent or corrupt. Your choice. I think a little of both. But Ruby? He practically spent the weekend at the police station and everyone there knew him. They knew he was a pimp and part of the mob, and yet they didn't even try to stop him. Actually, they enabled his opportunity. Having the entire exchange covered by dozens of media figures? A wide-open garage? with 50 people or more there? Unforgivable. They have no credibility whatsoever.
Many police officers were regular clients at Jack Ruby's Carousel Club. He knew them well, they knew him too. Without a trial the NYT already decided that Oswald was the president's killer. Like today, the media was part of the conspiracy and of indoctrinating the narrative.
Theyre not incompetent. They knew exactly what they were doing. As time goes on, more and more comes out linking Oswald to the CIA, the mob, he grew up in the homes of some of those mobsters, he was connected to Ruby, all the strangeness of connections to and interactions with George Demorenshildt, Bush with Arbusto Energy, and their ships, and mob and casinos in Cuba, and Miami, Florida, New Orleans, his time in New Orleans, and all the Sheep Dipping, and Allen Dulles. Its crazy. No Oswald did it alone. I don't even think he did it at all. He was a patsy. He didn't fire a gun that day.
and Nixon hired Jack Ruby to be his committees first hire as the investagator! Just chanace??
Kennedy himself had mob ties.
@@ultramagapurebloodpride8294 Well, his father definitely did and they did help him in the election. But most of all, Bobby was an arch-enemy of the Mob and they had to have seen him as a threat.
The assassination of Kennedy was a text book "cover your tracks" scenario when Ruby shot Oswald, who was not supposed to have gotten caught. With Oswald in custody there was no way the planners of the crime could allow him to be interrogated so enter Jack Ruby who had a checkered past which could be used as leverage against him and would have access to get close enough to Oswald to take him out. Otherwise, what motive would Ruby have for killing Oswald therefore ruining his life unless someone put him up to it.
I dunno, maybe because he was as big a wacko as Oswald, as Ruby's friends always firmly stated?
True, but the only damaging Oswald had to say was that he never hit Kennedy in the head. That as he aimed his third shot the head exploded. Which is why called himself a patsy.
That's why the police officer was taken out. Because they didn't want the police to take Oswald alive. They figured that would get the job done. But they were wrong.
@@aaronz7056 Hey its you again. For someone that doesn't believe this stuff you sure are in a lot of these videos. It's almost as if it's your job to keep the lie alive. 😉
@@feedyourmind6713 Oswald was a sheep dipped patsy and was the fall guy. He didn't fire any weapons that day.
This was the beginning of what’s happening today.
Things are about to get a lot worse…
Deception
Sounds like a CIA hit not the mob!
@@haroldbrown5308 Yep
Had dirt on the Clintons???
Vietnam, 9--11, Covid. It never stops.
And Texas is just or more corrupt as it was at that time. (I am 93 yrs. old and live with it every day). Latest incident was last week where 19 children and 2 teachers were killed in Uvalde as Police stood inactive in rescue.
th-cam.com/video/oqG1EGYB-fU/w-d-xo.html
(Recent TH-cam upload): th-cam.com/video/cLebrWsq1KQ/w-d-xo.html
When news like that crosses the pond, I switch off, otherwise i'm depressed for days.
Yes but odds are it was orchestrated from D.C. as was the JFK killing.
That I believe without a doubt...
The most dishonest guy I've ever met is a guy named WARREN COMMISSION
The corrupters in the government were the mastermind of deceptions, lies and coverups.
You misspelled the name Chu, it's the Warren Omission
@@haimlevy1950 Good point
Trust me, you've met worse!
@@johnd7435 I trust neither WARREN nor you if you trust WARREN
So we're supposed to believe that Ruby acted out of his great patriotism? What nonsense.
You mean you don't believe that Jack Ruby would sacrifice all, his freedom , his nightclub, and possibly even his life if a cop had shot HIM, just to spare Jackie Kennedy from a horrible trial ? Never mind that Jackie just two days prior had seen her husband get part of his head blown off and that she was covered in blood and brain matter from her husband ...Nothing could be more horrible than THAT !
I'm pretty sure that Jackie could have withstood a trial to get some justice for her dead husband....You mean you really don't believe their made-up narrative of why Ruby did what he did.? ...I'm sure your government is very disappointed in you . THEY worked so hard creating this fairytale.
@@ronaldholmes8525
The scary part is that the government story was swallowed whole by (it seems) the whole ruling class. Hard to believe they all were part of a plot. So why did they all go along?
frrss idiots actually believe oswald acted alone
AMEN. HE WAS MAFIA
Im not even convinced he died of cancer in prison. Im not sure if there is real actusl proof of his death or not. He could have just been released under that guise.
Never did believe Oswald killed Kennedy . He was the fall guy that had to be silenced .
Buurrp
Your fall guy was caught red-handed trying to shoot a cop.
@@aaronz7056 Hey Aaron …..I truly want to thank you for for clearing that up for me . I didn’t know he had the cop confused with Kennedy . 🥴
TRUE. HE EVEN TESTED NEGATIVE FOR POWDER BURNS NOV. 23
@@mikelldaley9078 He tested positive.
One thing I've heard is that a police officer went into the school book depository immediately after the shots were fired where he encountered Oswald in the breakroom several floors down from the place he supposedly fired from. In this account it stated that Oswald would not have had enough time to reach the breakroom by the time the officer arrived had he fired the shots. Has this account been verified either way?
@@CC-uh3zn Thank you for confirming. It's a detail that I seldom see mentioned because it seems to go against the narrative they want to establish.
Nope just the opposite.
Yes Oswald's boss at the school book depository was with the officer when they ran into Oswald in the break room
@@robertdickerson3083 Yes Baker recreated it for the WC i believe.Oswald made it pretty easily.
This has been verified indeed.
the paraffin test was positive for nitrates found in the ink in the books and boxes he had been loading by hand on to carts to be shipped out but the test was negative for gun shot residue this means two things he had not washed his hands to remove the nitrates and he did NOT fire a rifle or pistol that day
Thank you. And how did he wash his cheek (which was negative), without using his hands.
he didn't he had nitrates from the inks in the books and boxes of books but no gunshot residue@@lindagiovannazambanini6218
Oswald didn't fire a rifle nor a pistol, that day.
THANK YOU. someone who isn't a maroon or mockingbird asset finally
@@lindagiovannazambanini6218 washing doesn't help anyway, the grains get stuck in the pores of the skin
Also in question is the "source" of Ruby's cancer! He did, in wanting to be taken securely, to D.C. indicate he was in fear of his life. He said too many people had too many ways to kill him!
Yes I remember in the movie Ruby that is mentioned as well. We know you can in fact introduce cancer cells into people. Dr Sam Shepard who was eventually proven innocent allowed researchers to put cancer cells into him while inprisoned.
Mary's Monkey! Look it up
@@kenwaring th-cam.com/video/8bYSQ20vlLo/w-d-xo.html
I watched the Tonight Show when Martha Mitchell said men broke into her Hotel Room, held her down and injected something into her! She died of Cancer shortly after!
There have been a lot of people who the powers that be would like to have shut up, and conveniently they end up dead of rapid and aggressive cancer.
Ruby killed the patsy and ended up being one himself.
"The people who had to have so much to gain, and had such an ulterior motive, to put me in the position I'm in, will never let the true facts come above board to the world." -- Jack Ruby
"Are these people in high positions Jack"? Jack Ruby then answers, "YES."
Dale, you brought up one of the most important pieces of the puzzle. Jack Ruby’s testimony was quite telling.
Yes. That answer by Ruby pretty much confirms conspiracy/cover-up. Nuff said.
G.H.W.B.
???
"The commission has functioned in a fashion which totally disregards the rights of the accused." Sounds familiar? What about those "accused" and remain in prison regarding Jan. 6, 2021?
Those fuckers (Traitors) should rot.
Some things never change.
The fact remains , if you do not know your rights , you will be abused ! The only rights you have are those which you articulate .
😂 those are traitors caught on camera assaulting police. False Equivalency.
@@PennyLane-wc3iq Watch alot of NBC , CBS , and ABC do we ?
So JFK was allegedly shot by Oswald. Then before Oswald could talk, Ruby shot Oswald. Then before Ruby could talk, he died in jail.
Nothing going on here folks!
You're right, nothing going on here.
"Before Ruby could talk..." he'd had over 3 years to talk, including at his trial where he could have come forward with any public statement he wanted to make.
@@aaronz7056 Do you know what Operation Northwoods is? (Beyond just the Wikipedia article)
@@justinmadrid8712 Do you know what "crackpot paranoia" is?
@@aaronz7056 And here you are accusing another person of paranoia. (shaking my head)
Actually, Ruby did talk a bit and was the basis for his contracting a fast-acting cancer (even though he had regular routine check-ups, which showed he was in good health).
Here's one for you ...when does a head fly backwards and part of that head lands behind the body...when shot from behind, doesn't happen.
It does when a skull explodes, physics takes over, and pieces of skull fly straight up in the air while the car is moving forward.
Have you ever seen the Zapruder film with a bullet trajectory added and coming from the storm drain? Looks pretty much perfect to me, splatter, movement and all.
@@markdelgado8963
I don't think prices of the skull would fly straight up. do you have any science for this theory?
The direction a person's head goes after being shot is meaningless regarding what direction the bullet came from. Kennedy's head goes slightly forward at the instant of impact and blood and gore went in all directions.
@@aaronz7056
we don't really have the blood spatter evidence in this case because law the limousine was ruined as evidence by the executive branch of the u.s. govt. and probably same thing with the corpse.
I have studied this case for several years I have seen hundreds if not thousands of documentaries about this case. I just hope that I will get all the information and all of the details of what actually happened 11-22-1963 before I pass away.
I think many of us feel that way. Millions still living (I was 11) have resigned ourselves to the fact that (what used to be America) had a coup. Period.
Sorry, that isn't likely...The assassination was covered up extremely well by a lot of evil people, and too much time has gone by to expect to know the full truth of what happened that day in Dallas , and the immediate days afterwards. They say a case begins to go cold after just 48 hours . .Imagine how cold this case is after nearly 60 years. But the clues we have that conspiracy WAS involved are many , too many , to think otherwise. God knows the whole truth ....Maybe someday we'll hear it from Him.
The truth will come out--it was a coup!
@@haroldbrown5308 Would hope so Harold but doubt will ever see light of day til our generation is gone. Imo it WAS so nefarious, so traumatic; if ever it'll be a sidenote to (almost) ancient history. People will have far bigger fish to fry in that era. Only God knows what they'll have to be dealing with then. "JF who??"
The snow ball started to roll when no legal counsel was given Oswald.
It's hard to find anything that was done right in accordance with our laws.
Aquilla Clemons said TWO men were there when Tippit was shot...neither of whom resembled Oswald . Then 2 days later an investigator came and said she should NOT tell anyone or she might get hurt. No conspiracy, huh?
Oswald did have a revolver on him though when finally arrested in the cinema.
@@barriewright6727 Conspiriacies revolve around dishonesty
Clemons didn't see the shooting. She saw the aftermath. And every person who did see the shooting (five) said it was one man who shot Tippit. All the bullets from Oswald's gun were removed from Tippit's body. Do a little more reading on the subject.
@@bruceberman761 Clemons was utterly clear...and was told that harm could come to her. THis is a constant theme of the literal hundreds of rabbit trails connected to the conspiracy
@@barriewright6727 But isn't it true that when he tried to shoot a policeman, it malfunctioned and wouldn't fire? In other words, wasn't he given that gun to make him a defenseless and easy target?
I believe Oswald was supposed to be killed by the police when they found him after shooting a Dallas police officer. Unfortunately for the planners of this situation, Dallas police department followed protocol and arrested Oswald which caused a new situation that had to be dealt with quickly. This is where Ruby comes in.
How does a conspiracy know:
- Oswald will immediately flee the TSBD
- Oswald will successfully escape Dealey Plaza
- Oswald owns a revolver
- exactly where the revolver is
- Oswald will definitely go specifically to Oak Cliff
- a cop will be killed at 10th and Patton at exactly the right moment for Oswald to get blamed for it
- the cop won't simply outdraw and capture his attacker
- every cop who happens to be among the first ones to arrive at the theater in answer to a tip about a suspect in a cop-killing is likely to slaughter the suspect at the scene
Etc.?
Oswald had a Revolver... The bullet casings found at the Tippit crime scene were out of semi automatic pistols, Pistols, There were Two Different Casings found... Also, Revolvers do not eject the fired rounds, they store in the Revolver...
Besides, before the Revolver disappeared, tests performed said the Firing Pin on it was bent...
Ruby was killed by Dr. Jolly West
@@montydaniels1054 Revolver did not disappear, the firing pin was fine, and bullets were matched to it. Who the heck do you *think* shot Tippit, for goodness' sake?
Lee Harveys 2nd cousins neighbors ex wife once worked with a distant relatvie of J Edgar Hoover. Now get this, Hoovers childhood teachers brother-in-law was in New Orleans at the time of the shootings and actually picked up and read one of the Communist leaflets Oswald had passed out.
Now this is where it gets weird. The man who printed those leaflets...well his grandfather was friends with a women whose boss once dated a women that knew someone that knew Lincolns assasin...Booth.
Now if that doesnt convince you of a conspiracy then keep watching the countless similar conspiracies.
“For some time I have been disturbed by the way the CIA has been diverted from its original assignment,” “It has become an operational and at times a policy-making arm of the Government" wrote former president Harry Truman in the Washington Post on December 22, 1963. It was exactly one month after the assassination of President Kennedy.
This is a very interesting comment from Truman. Kennedy had vowed to put the brake on the CIA - fired it's head.
"That's how a conspiracy works. Those boys on the gressy knoll, dead within three hours. Buried in unmarked graves out past Terulingua"
"You know this for a fact?"
"Still got the shovel."
Levon Helm - "Shooter"
You must have seen SHOOTER also
OK 🆗 enough already Oswald killed Kennedy ruby killed Oswald cancer killed ruby. That's it end of f...king story
Oswald was executed to keep the truth from coming out. He and Jack Ruby knew each other very well. There are many eye witnesses that saw them together at a wide variety of venues.
Weren't they also both seen socializing with Tippit?
@@youtuber5305 most certainly . . .
th-cam.com/video/kSn1pIozaA4/w-d-xo.html
Names of these supposed eyewitnesses? You people lie so much.
Read a little, girls worked there ID them
Anyone with half a thought of their own has always known Mr Oswald did not do it.
In that case you will now explain how the people framing this innocent man could have known:
- he would show up unexpectedly at the house Nov. 21, otherwise they can't pretend he smuggled the rifle Nov. 22
- nobody would ever find any bullets or fragments that don't match to his rifle
- he would lie to police about his whereabouts
- he would immediately flee the crime scene
- he would decide at the last minute to put a jacket on, then discard it
- an imposter who looks so much like him he is guaranteed to fool the nearly dozen witnesses who ID Oswald needs to be hanging around 10th and Patton
- Officer Tippit won't simply outdraw and capture his attacker
- Oswald will agree to help frame himself by getting caught red-handed trying to shoot a second cop
- Oswald will fight so violently 3 officers get injured just disarming him
- Oswald will observe, "Well, they say it only takes a minute to die" after asking about the penalty for cop-killing
- Oswald will turn down help from the President of the Dallas Bar Association
- Oswald will act so smug he even convinces his own brother he's guilty
- Oswald will just shrug a hollow, rambling reply when asked on live TV, "Did you shoot the President?"
@@aaronz7056 I always thought the fact he took off from the book depository building asap was suspicious enough. If he really had nothing to do with it (or the ludicrous one that he was an FBI informant); then he would have stayed out and given a statesmen of what he saw or heard to the authorities!
None of these conspiracy clowns have ever addressed Guus when I brought it up.
It's possible that maybe Oswald was exactly what he said he was a patsy! Oswald was supposed to be a communist and a defecter who went to the Soviet union if he was communist what was he doing in the Marine Corp? In the Marines Communists would be shot by a firing squad! I believe that when he went to Russia the government sent him over there and when he was a marine Oswald was taught the Russian language they wouldn't do that unless they were training you for a job! I firmly believe that after the Marines Oswald started working for the CIA and maybe he was part of the assignation of Kennedy but the man that really shot Kennedy was standing in the grassy knoll area and maybe only Oswald knew who the man was And that's why they silenced him for forever
Without a DOUBT, we NOW know, LHO WAS a CIA asset; BEFORE he "defected"-- go find my response above, regarding the question of Roy Truly and the police officer. I think you also posted a reply there. Was LHO ONE of the shooters? No. Why? Because as Mark Lane said in this video clip (which is the first time I SAW it), the paraffin/GSR test on Oswald was "negative". LHO, true to his statement, "...didn't shoot anybody". Given LHOs level of competence in shooting (barely qualifying) with a SUPERIOR semi-auto rifle [the M1 Garand], shooting at STATIC targets, shooting at a MOVING target, with an old [20+years], Italian, MilSurp, BOLT-ACTION rifle, and HITTING anything would be like shooting at the moon. And as Jim Garrison wrote in his book, "Those who would kill the king, MUST...NOT...MISS." Nobody running such an op, would jeopardize the success of the mission, by 1/3; failure is NOT an option. It's real easy to blame a deadman. And then the CIA uses cancer, to kill Ruby, inside the jail. Read the books "Dr Mary's Monkeys", and Judyth Vary Baker's, "Lee an Me". Foreword is written by Jim Marrs ("Crossfire", one of the two books Oliver Stone used for his JFK movie). LBJ was not the planner, and probably didn't know, until the day before, when he had dinner at a TX oil man's home, named Clint Murcheson. Nixon was there, as was J.E. Hoover; according to the domestic help at the time. LBJ was relied upon for the cover-up, AFTER the fact, as HE was the one who appointed the members of the Warren Commission. Do you think "the fix was in"...?
Absolutely they put Oswald together like a puzzle to be a patsy and making him out to be a communist and a traitor,in reality he was a USA Marine, like I said why would he be in the Marines if he was a communist? Communists would be shot by a firing squad in the Marines! Jack Ruby shot Oswald on TV inside of a police station with 70 armed cops all around at point blank range! Anybody with 1/4 of a brain would know that the whole thing was a set up conspiracy! Only a embasol would believe what the warren commission said!
If there ever was a mystery man, it's Lee Harvey Oswald....I wonder why that is ?
The film taken by Abraham zapruner showed very clearly that Kennedy was shot from the right which is toward the picket fence on the grassy knoll there were 51 witnesses that said they heard shots come from there including a young couple the Newman's in 2013 when it was the 50th anniversary of the assassination the Newman's now a elder couple still said they heard the shot come over their head and strike Kennedy and it came from the picket fence area and a police officer stopped his motorcycle and ran to the grassy knoll after it happened because he thought the shot came from there as well said that he smelled gunpowder like someone had just fired a rifle
Finally--it was a coup
He pissed off alot of people. But none more, than the ones who would be affected most by his proposal to 'change the federal reserve notes'. Unable to launder millions of useless 'notes'.....just....gone. 'They' couldn't let that happen.
Cosa Nostra.
Really I didn't know this .but that is a strong contender for his assassination. Hoover I'm not sure what to think about him, definitely Mafia tho . 👁️👁️
Josey Wailer, There you have it! Nice to see someone else that sees that connection. By signing executive order 11110 JFK actually did have several hundred thousand dollars worth of REAL US currency printed, backed by gold and silver. I Actually remember looking at one as a child of 7-8 and noticing that where it now says "Federal Reserve Note" it said "Silver Certificate" and asking my father what that meant. Also the little stamped insignia was red not green. Yeah JFK pissed off a lot of powerful people, CIA, the Mob to name a couple but few people connect the dots to the FED and the private bankers that own it. If Kennedy was allowed to continue printing real interest free money (the way it's supposed to be) it would have eventually knocked the Federal Reserve scam out of business. I believe it's by design that nobody even knows about that pesky little fact. They want everyone pointing fingers at the Mob or CIA or Hoover's FBI, or LBJ as a distraction. My theory is they all played a willing role in it but were just the hired guns....
@@Emondotcalm I entirely agree with you . This puts it all in the picture . lol . This was the missing pieces .😎
@@lloydbeattie9370 and military industrial complex--Coup!
Also, it seems 911 has faded into obscurity, a lot of questions need to be answered about that day too, cell phones that were impossible to make. Hijackers that do not appear on flight manifests. A huge airliner that disappears after hitting the pentagon. Reporting building seven had collapsed after even seeing it in the television news report. Supposed hijackers found still alive in Saudi Arabia. What was on the bottom of that plane that hit the second building. Insurance payments amounting to the billions. Punt options investments before that tragic event. Need I go on?
Watch the info/pics on PSA flight 182 San Diego 1978. This is what really happens when a fully loaded passenger jet crashes. There are flying body parts everywhere along with the other debris.
Wait till you see the truth about MLK and RFK you will know for a fact they did JFK and 9 one one
@Mark Ross: 100% correct sir. Far too many inconsistencies, coincidences, and occurrences that defied the Laws of Physics. If I may add one more.... The approach of United Airlines Flight 175 before it hit the South Tower was recorded by civilian FAA RADAR towers at a speed of 582 mph, which is impossible for that particular aircraft at such a low altitude. According to Aeronautical Engineers, it would take SIX TIMES the thrust its engine were capable of producing to reach that speed at that altitude, and the aircraft itself would most likely have broken apart before reaching that speed.
@Mark Ross I agree. No alleged hijackers appeared on any video footage at the airports involved. Time stamped images would have been shown if they had been there.
Fucking lies-Do you work for Jazeera?
And, the paraffin test would have shown gunshot residue as a result of Officer Tippet’s murder as well. That murder left no time for a clean up when he was arrested at the movie theater. Impossible!
tippet shot at about 1:15-1:20 Lee in the theater at exactly 1:00pm
Very odd .
Jfk dead , ruby dead , Dorothy dead , Oswald dead .... if I didn’t know, I would say the wizard of Oz is out for revenge.
In about 10 years, EVERY witness was dead! Read the book, High Treason" by Groden and Livingstone.
if they only had a brain... and jack ruby slippers too. great observation Eliza.
@@AbsurdityViewer and wicked witches from the North, south, east and west
I get Dorothy, who are the others supposed to represent?
@@AbsurdityViewer
Ok. Got it. Thanks
But why would the wizard of Oz kill himself? (Oswald)
Amazingly, they were so positive that Harvey was the only shooter that LBJ felt perfectly safe enough to hang around for over two hours until a judge could be found so that he could be sworn in on Texas soil. In the famous picture of LBJ being sworn in the chief of the Dallas Police dept is in the photo behind him, He's the one to the right of LBJ with the glasses on, if you look close he doesn't look very happy with or fond of LBJ, Whats going on? Why is he there? Why isn't he out looking for possible accomplices? How did he know there was nothing to worry about, and he didn't need to be at his job ???
LBJ did not hang around till they next afternoon. They left in a big rush the same day
He was sworn in on Air Force One en route from Dallas to Washington that afternoon.
Idk. Why did George W hang around that school in Florida after 2nd plane hit the WTC?
Well, Oswald WAS the only shooter. LBJ was flown back to Washington on Nov 22. He did not hang around Dallas.
@@nicholasmuro1742 He didn't plan it but was involved and made sure to let it happen. He's been caught lying about that day several times.
My gma roomed with LHO mother at the time. She told me before things aren’t what they appear. I agree with this.
Trusting the government is like trusting your enemy.
the government is the enemy!
LBJ's own brother said "You want to know who killed JFK? Ask Lyndon".
Or Lydon's daughter's boy friend--they all know that it was a coup!
lbj had his own hitman, thats all you need to know about that pos
@@seanwhitehouse2274 POS he was!
LBJ said that it HAD to be a conspiracy - then he is put out of commission. He was a part of it and a beneficiary of it, but once he started talking - they had to put him to an end. Even the HINT of opening their mouths while having been a key player - such as succeeding president, would influence the public to totally believe whatever he said. Even if he were merely trying to take himself out of it for fear of the plot being uncovered, he was running his mouth, so he had to go. Funeral timings with testimonies and running mouths, are never coincidences.
It is so obvious that Oswald never acted alone. LBJ definitely had a lot to do with it. I have no doubt in my mind about this. If you dig deep you'll find all of this to be true by just what's out there.
If you actually dig you'll find the Warren Commission got it right.
@@donjindra I bet that you think that the 2020 election wasn't fixed too and still wear that worthless mask in a car by yourself. AmIright??? Do you know what a woman is? How many genders are there?
@@donjindra Wrong.
@@donjindra Dig Don dig
@@jimwatson4812 I'm so sick of you deranged conspiracy nuts. There must be 1000 popular conspiracies these days and virtually no evidence for any of them. You folks are corrupting society.
They didn’t find Oswald’s fingerprints on the rifle until after he was killed.
I don't think it was fingerprints.. it was a palm print..rigor mortis had set in so they had to settle for a palm print ....
Never did find finger prints, they claimed the had a palm print.
@@michaelhayes9773 Right. But you get it. They took a palm print from a dead man!
They murdered Jack Ruby in prison. Injected him with cancer. Killed gum before he could testify at his new trial.
They never found his fingerprints on the rifle, it was his palm print and it was the only print found on the rifle. The print was located near the butt of the stock, which is not where the palm would be during firing. This would indicate that the shooter wiped it down after the shooting but before it was found in order to get rid of their own fingerprints. This in turn would indicate that an individual other than Oswald actually did the shooting!
The one question that remains unanswered is: Why did someone who [allegedly] assassinated the president of the US and [allegedly] killed without reason officer Tippit have to go into a movie house and see a movie he had not seen? This makes Lee Harvey Oswald one of the most peculiar "assassins" in the history of crime.
that was where his handlers said to go
I was surprised on reading the Report how biased against Oswald it felt....as those his guilt was a foregone conclusion. I was a young child when all this happened, and I've always questioned Ruby killing Oswald as a patriotic act from the day it occurred.
The whole thing is monstrous garbage. Even though I know it's a lot more than The Mob,Charles Brandt's new book shows how it's just a bridge to far for our Academics and So Called Historians to acknowledge that 1. You can't trust a Supreme Court Justice 2. Likewise FBI Director. 3.Likewise Former CIA Director. 4. Vice President and then President at all on the Death Of our President at the time for the WC.
FYI LHO TESTED NEGATIVE FOR POWDER BURNS NOV 23
Yeah, that's how I saw it too.
Conspiracies do exist the only crazy people are those that believe they don't.
Except for the fact they pick the wrong ones~
Ya got that backwards bro.
If it was just a coincidence that President Kennedy was killed in the home state of the next President, his Vice President Lyndon Johnson than why is it that the President killed before him, President McKinley was killed in the home state of the next President, his Vice President Theodore Roosevelt? If they were just a coincidence than why is it that out of all the Presidents and presidential candidates in the last 120 plus years since McKinley, the only other assassination was President Kennedy's brother, Robert, while Johnson was still President, in the home state of the next President, another Vice President, Richard Nixon? If they were all just a coincidence than why was it that Vice President Al Gore, running for President was politically killed by a voting controversy in the home state of the brother of the next President, Bush43, the son of a Vice President that wanted to be President again, Bush41? Coincidence or evidence of home state conspiracy of Vice Presidents that wanted to be President?
I've never met a person who could keep a secret. Still, people insist that everything is a conspiracy. Whenever a group of people do anything, someone always opens their yap. Usually things are exactly what they seem. Thinking otherwise is just your fear of the world around you.
@@markevan1 Well said-- i now leave this task of dealing with these boneheads to you. There is yet hope.!
I've always wondered, why didn't Oswald shoot while the car was slowing to make the turn, instead, waiting for the parade to be going away from him while speeding up. I have not been able to find anywhere this is discussed.
The shot came from the sewer hitting JFK in the head and knocking him backward! I've been to the spot! A man could stand (did stand) in it very comfortably, and walked out to the other side of the overpass into a wooded area. The sewer is directly beneath the 'grassy knoll'. When the shots were fired the smoke rose giving bystanders the false impression that the shots were fired from behind the knoll.
@@MajorWolfgangHochstetter What I asked is, if Oswald were the shooter, full stop, then why didn't he shoot as the car was at a crawl right below him, I would think, a much easier shot.
Oswald was not on the 6th floor that day and did not fire any gun.
@@MajorWolfgangHochstetter Interesting - but I think the last shot came from behind the fence at the grassy knoll. The gunmen who fired that shot had secret service credentials - he threw the gun into the trunk of his car after he shot Kennedy and flashed his credentials to anyone who questioned him.
Oswald could have easily reversed his position at the window ( IF it was Oswald ) and taken those shots at Kennedy as he came down Houston Street ...Those would have been much easier shots. But the conspiritors had to wait until Kennedy got in the exact position in Dealy Plaza in order to open up on Kennedy from different directions. This isn't really rocket science, folks.
"The men who killed Kennedy," and "JFK unsolved; the real conspiracies documentary." Both a must watch.
Men Who Killed Kennedy is an hilarious joke made by paranoid and gullible producers who swallowed every crackpot conspiracy theory told to them and which gives loads of screen time to *demosntrable* liars, grifters and con artists like Robert Groden, Bev Oliver, Gordon Arnold, Jim Garrison, Jean Hill, etc.
An unrelated unfortunate coincidence of course.( That no one talks about) LBJ's illegitimate son and a few other "undesirables" in the Dallas area also died from a "fast spreading cancer" in this same time period. There is a video somewhere suggesting that this "cancer" was caused by an "injection"
@@artsyjean Actually, it was a covid vaccine shot. Unfortunately no data on if it was a booster or his 2nd jab.
@@artsyjean so you dont think Ruby was fed LSD while in jail? AND you think Ruby suddenly got a fast spreading cancer from the stress of being in jail? Do you also think Ruby was not told to kill oswald? Do you think Ruby acted alone out of concern for the country?? AND of course the Zapruder film was not hacked by the FBI? AND you want me to believe the BACK of JFK's head was blown off by a bullet that entered from the REAR?
@@artsyjean oh goodness dj, I am guessing you got vaccinated, hence taking my joke so personal. I wonder if dj is actually short for Karen. lol
@@insertnamehere313 yes AND the Dr. who visited ruby was LATER Charles Mansons Parole officer
"Suggesting...."
Did you know LBJ resigned from his job as Navy intelligence leader immediately upon being sworn in? Military intelligence and the military industrial complex were tied to each other
LBJ was part of the coup--ask his daughter or her boy friend who was a House page! He knows it was a coup!
I still remember the day before watching the noon news talking about Dallas. I 100% KNEW the bubble should have been on the Lincoln. I was a month before my 10th BD.
Also, Mark Lane's "Rush to Judgement". Great book!
Book is packed with fabrications and Lane was a total con artist, demonstrably so.
Witnesses like Charles Brehm called him "a despicable liar" and John Connally "evil."
He was soundly condemned by the investigation for misleading them with conspiracy theories he couldn't back up with evidence.
He disgusted interview subjects by twisting their words.
Don't miss Bob Katz's Mother Jones article "Mark Lane - The Left's Leading Hearse Chaser."
I read 3 of Lanes books. I always wondered why when Oswald was begging for someone to come forward and represent him why didnt Lane???
@@dereksanders7359 he was denied representation
If any lawyer came forward, it wouldn't have changed anything too his death. He would never make it too a courtroom.
Ruby had a favor to return & it was killing Oswald, who definitely did not kill JFK, no matter how the commission diluted & disheveled the truth by omitting the Grassy Knoll shooter who blew the skull off JFK with a close range side shot & also vigorously pinning it on an innocent man located 300' behind where a high power close range direct side shot was an impossibility. This country or whatever is left of it should exonerate Oswald of this dubious distinction and either give up the guilty party if known or leave it as unknown/unsolved to get this historical scourge against Oswald removed.
This country? You mean the “United Socialist States of America “?
Oswald I think got a shot off but I don’t think it was the kill shot remember other people were also hit and I’m not just talking about the governor also I question who killed jd Tippett too
@@dannydillon4144 Wasn't any shot! Oswald did not kill JFK from the Grassy Knoll PERIOD!
@@bobbeezel2593 United Mess of America!
@@edwardanthony7283 No one is claiming that Oswald was on the grassy knoll . JFK was shot from the front .
As Woody Allen said "I'm working on a non-fiction version of the Warren Report".
Several things are either distorted or just flat out ignored that prove that 1) there was more than one shooter, and 2) Oswald was not one of the shooters. This does not mean that I believe that Oswald was not involved. I am quite convinced that Oswald was involved, but just was not one of the shooters.
90 seconds - The first officer to breach the Book Depository immediately recognized the shots as gunfire when others were still questioning if it was fireworks. It took that officer 90 seconds from the final shot to find Oswald in the 2nd floor cafeteria. There is no way physically possible that Oswald made it from the 6th floor sniper nest to the 2nd floor cafeteria in 90 seconds; especially when taking into account that the spent cartridges were found neatly side by side on the window sill; the rifle had no fingerprints meaning that it had to be thoroughly wiped down; and he had to cross the building from the sniper nest to the stairs and again from the stairs to the cafeteria, utilized the soda machine, and open the Coca-Cola that he was drinking when found.
Brain matter on trunk - everyone has seen the footage of the headshot that ends with Jackie on the trunk and Agent Clint Hill climbing on the back of the car and ushering her back into the seats. According to the Warren Report, there were 4 testimonies explaining why Jackie was on the trunk. The testimonies were from Clint Hill, Jackie, and the motorcycle cops on either side of presidential limo. All 4 testimonies made the same claim, that Jackie was on the trunk to retrieve brain matter. The laws of physics dictate that if shot from behind, the brain matter would have been found in the front seat of the limo, not on the trunk.
Flurry of shots - Both agents in the front seat of the lime testified that they heard a flurry of bullets passing overhead at the time of the headshot. The word flurry indicates not one, but multiple shots fired at almost the exact same time. Multiple shots mean multiple shooters.
3 shots? - The one thing that we hear over and over is that there were only 3 shots. One round was the "magic" bullet that hit both JFK and Gov Connelly. A second was the bullet fragments from the head wound, and the third disintegrated on the pavement when it missed the target. However, new evidence has come about that the head wound fragments may have come from as many as 3 different rounds (www.sciencedaily.com/releases/2007/05/070517142528.htm). And the entire case of how many rounds is based on audio evidence. What this evidence fails to take into account is the lack of acoustics from additional rifles that possibly could have utilized silencers. For those who want to argue against silencers, the silencer was invented by Hiram Maxim JR, the son of the inventor of the modern machine gun, in 1901, and silencers were well available in the 1960s.
This is just a short listing of evidence that disproves Oswald being a lone gunman. An entire book can be written about how the evidence does not add up to Oswald being a gunman at all or even acting alone. The only thing the evidence can prove is Oswald's involvement, but none of it can prove that he even fired a single shot. I personally believe that he was involved based on 2 key pieces of evidence, 1) the rifle found near the sniper's nest was indeed his, and 2) his statement that he was a patsy, if he wasn't involved, he would have said that he was a scapegoat not a patsy. However, I have yet to see any explanation of the evidence that would convince me that he even fired a shot or acted alone.
There was up to six different shooting teams, more than one were told to stand down because Jackie was in the line of fire. Zapruder was Mossad
Bush ran the whole show.
Young Oswald could easily have made it down to the lunch room in the time he had.
Blood and brain matter went in all directions, splattering everyone further ahead in the car.
"Flurry of shots" is mighty vague. Most witnesses, including journalists, people on the lower floors of the TSBD, etc., firmly heard exactly three shots.
There is no known audio recording of the assassination. The dictabelt recording was discredited and found to be invalid forty years ago.
Seriously. have you done *any* research in this case?
@@aaronz7056 You are full of it... you are only taking into account the dissention of 4 flights of stairs. Let's look at ALL of what had to happen to fit the evidence if Oswald was a lone gunman! 1) The elevators were not working, so he had to use the stairs. 2) The stairs were on the opposite side of the building that the sniper nest. 3) the entire floor was filled with pallets of books that he would have had to navigate (no straight-line distance from the nest to the stairs). 4) The casings were found on the windowsill neatly placed side by side (it would have taken time for him to find the ejected casings and line them up). 5) no fingerprints found on the rifle which means that he would have had to take the time to wipe the rifle down. 6) The entrance to the cafeteria was in the middle of the building, meaning that he would have had to cross half the building from the stairs. 7) he would have had to have done this without being seen which was impossible because there were 2 women on the stairs and multiple people on the 2nd floor, all of whom said that they never saw him during that timeframe! THERE IS NO WAY POSSIBLE FOR ALL OF THIS TO HAVE HAPPENED IN 90 SECONDS! That is unless you somehow think that Oswald had the magic capability to defy the laws of physics!
@@frankpesco7723 It was Prescott Bush and Dulles, George H. W as a nobody back then but had connections to the CIA through his uncle. Prescott Bush and Dulles were business partners before and friends. JFK blamed the entire Bay of Pigs on Dulles. Bush and Dulles wanted revenge and that’s what they got. Oswald was just a fall guy someone they used though their connections with their various off shore business including the ones they had in Cuba.
They made sure Ruby could never expose the truth.
Jolly West
A shot from a storm drain in front of the motorcade is the ONLY way the head went back and to the left, PERIOD. Studied it for years and to have them want us to believe that a man fired 3 shot off hand from a 6.5 Carano crutch on a moving target with 2 hits in under 9 seconds is laughable.
I BELIEVE THERE WERE 4 SHOOTERS :: ONE BELOW OSWALD ' S SUPPOSED FLOOR , OSWALD 'S FLOOR WAS A SET UP , THE SEWER , THE FENCE BY THE RAILROAD , AND THE BUILDING DIRECTLY BEHIND THE MOTORCADE THE MOMENT THE SHOTS WERE FIRED ❗️ WHOM EVER PLANNED THIS , THERE WERE MANY INVOLVED SND THEY WANTED TO BE CERTAIN KENNEDY WAS HIT & DEAD ❗️ I BELIEVE THEY ALSO INVOLVED IN VARIOUS NEFARIOUS WAYS VIA COMPARTMENTALIZING , SEPARATING ALL FROM KNOWING EACH OTHER , EXCEPT FOR EXAMPLE THAT THE POLICE DEPARTMENT ALL KNEW RUBY & POSSIBLY LATER REALIZED CERTSIN CONNECTIONS BUT AS LOCAL CORRUPTED POLICE DEPARTMENTS ARE WERE AFRAID TO SAY SOMETHING TO LINK OTHERS TO SUSPICIOUS ACTIVITIES OR WRONG DOINGS
AND I BELIEVE WITH CERTAINY THAT OSWALD DID NOT SHOOT ANY RIFLE AND WHEN HE SUDDENLY REALIZED HE WAS BEING OBVIOUSLY SET UP & THAT THE POLICE WERE PART OF THE MOB HE TOOK EVASIVE ACTIONS AND UNTIL HE WAS SUBDUED & BEAT UP HE AGAIN AS HE WAS TAKEN OUT OF THE HOLDING AREA WITH SHOCK REALIZED THIS WAS THE MOMENT HE WAS FORCED TO BE SUBJECT TO BE A STATIONARY (( A TUNNEL OF FEAR )) TARGET FOR SOMEBODY (( RUBY ))
IT IS OBVIOUS THAT OSWALD WAS A DECOY ,, A DISTRACTION , A DIVERSION
I concur with you100% There is another on this thread who states the same as our views on that fatal shot and i said he was the only one who is correct.until i saw your comment. I to have studied this for many years Perfect place ,perfect angle and great hiding spot even the people on the steps say "they smelled and saw gun smoke reachinh them" (And where is the drain? Right below the steps.) The Shooter was Johnny Roselli .
It came from the left of the overpass in front of them.not a Strom drain
''Jack Ruby: Everything pertaining to what's happening has never come to the surface. The world will never know the true facts, of what occurred, my motives. The people had, that had so much to gain and had such an ulterior motive for putting me in the position I'm in, will never let the true facts come above board to the world."
Ruby was a patsy just as L H O the hero of the soviet union
If anyone saw a film clip or photo of Jack Ruby from behind, as I have, they would be absolutely positive that the man that shot Oswald was not Jack Ruby. Jack Ruby had a duck tail (tapered) hairline at the collar. The shooter has a square cut hairline.
Also. Immediately after Oswald was shot the shooter was surrounded to conceal his identity the dozens of cameras and video films that were all focused on the action, yet no one managed to capture an image of the shooter's face. Then immediately after the shooting, the police collected all of the films as 'evidence' and only released the films that the public are allowed to see.
Interestingly, immediately after Oswald was shot, while the shooter was surrounded, he continued shooting, yet no one else was injured. This means that the shooter was firing blanks. Immediately, after Oswald was 'shot' he was taken back inside the police department and later, when he is finally brought out, he is subconscious, so he could not talk to reporters.
When an autopsy is performed on Oswald it reveals that he was shot in the heart. Although, if you compare the films and photos of the moment that Oswald was supposedly shot, the gun is pointed at his stomach. Oswald was actually shot by the man that got into the ambulance with him.
Wow that makes sense
I looked in Marrs' book Crossfire, and it's possible that the body of Oswald who was autopsied was not Oswald. The autopsy report had no mention of any identifying scars on the body from his military records. It's possible that Oswald had doppelgängers, including the one in the grave, which was never exhumed for identification.
I also think that it's possible Oswald was not shot at all. He was wearing a white T-shirt, which would have easily shown blood from the wound, but at the last minute, he was wearing a dark knit sweater. So there would be no visible evidence of any wound, and Oswald could possibly have been shot with blanks.
@@bobholtzmann The man that everyone thinks was Oswald was an imposter. That is why the man did not have the identifying scars noted in Oswald's military records. The real Oswald probably died during his military service, then military intelligence used his identity for the person everyone thinks is Oswald who was autopsied.
@@robertperry4439 Very interesting stuff -- I'm beginning to see this man playing Oswald as a military operative being taken out of public awareness through a staged event, very much like that shooting scene at Mount Rushmore in Hitchock's movie North By Northwest - it's almost like they used the film as a playbook.
We are from the government and we are here to help, terrifying words
Even worse "I'm Chris Hansen....."
I trust Russia more.
One thing I can't get out of my head is how close to Jackie that last shot was. Mere inches away from her face. I've always wondered how it affected her. I would've soiled my clothes for sure. The killers were ruthless since they had to know if they missed, they could've hit her.
Your comment would fuel the flames of those who believe that JFK was shot at short range from the front by a pistol.
@@youtuber5305 No, I believe it was a rifle. The still picture taken by Mary Moorman, after years of studying and magnifying, shows "badgeman" at the exact moment of the kill shot. After all these years, there are so many books, documentaries and studies of 1q/22/1963, it is now ludicrous to me to believe Oswald killed Kennedy or even fired a shot. The Warren Commission Report is a fictional tale.
You think the killers cared? They were ordered and paid murderers--it was a coup! Viet Name here we come!
shot from knoll entered and exited back of head on the right, missing her
She feared for the lives of her children which is why she married Onassis and lived on his protected island for years.
For years I was involved in compatition shooting. My friends and I had purchased some Italian Carcano's rifles, the same kind Oswald supposedly used. Thay we're new in the crate. I did tot think much of them. In fact I thought thay we're the most generic gun I ever saw. Well put all aside we took them to the range. What junk. Nobody could hit anything. It was a quest to get this gun to hit what I was trying to hit. I was defeated . I gave up. What a piece of junk.
You are full of crap; and you are insulting Italians.. Fish in a barrel shot, it was.. 60 years and you crazy people won't quit.
@@johnd7435 you are the one who is full of crap.
I have nothing against Italian,s. My wife is off the boat Italian. But facts are facts. Not one of the 10 rifles would group at 100 yards. And 100 yards is a starting standard for center fire rifles. We also had British, Russian, Swiss, and German WW2 rifles, with war surplus ammo. Thay all shot with much accuracy.
@@martintodd8219 so, you are saying they make crappy rifles !
I saw a meticulously researched documentary on British TV some 7 or 8 years back. The maker had high resolution audio analysis which discerned the number of shots, I THINK, it was 3, In 6 seconds? Anyhow, He then hired the current best USA competition rifle marksmen, equipped them with the exact model of rifle said to be the 1 used by Oswald. None of them got anywhere close to the number of shots in that timescale due to the reloading and refocusing accuracy required. It concluded that all the shots came from more than 1 source.
Further research demonstrated the 1st shot hit the tarmac, the 2nd entered the car and struck an official and exited his arm at the elbow. The 3rd shot hit Kennedy's head from behind. The documentary maker interviewed and analysed film of including the pathologist at the establishment Kennedy was rushed to. The pathology lab man said a lot of brain was still within the shattered skull, it had lots of fragments of what in his experience were DumDum bullets. Then, Secret Service agents burst into the lab and removed him from the scene. When he was allowed back in, Kennedy's brain had been removed, but he noticed there were still some bullet fragments in the skull.
Oswalds rifle did not have that type of bullet according to the shells found at his position.
It was possited that only Secret Service personnel were routinely armed with that type of ammunition.
The pathology lab man surmised the brain removal was to cover up the presence of DumDum bullet fragments.
Further analysis of film footage of the scene, showed Secret Service agents piling out of the following security limo when the shooting started. A discharge of a weapon by one of the egressing agents was clearly seen. That is what it was said, struck Kennedy's head, killing him.
It was subsequently found, that the agent had not had the safety catch engaged on his weapon, which ACCIDENTALLY discharged and by a fluke the bullet hit Kennedy.
The agent who fired the fatal accidental shot was named in the documentary, but I cannot remember his name. He was removed from Secret Service duties and demoted to Traffic duties until his retirement.
Thus it was said, the Secret Service knew it was a terrible accident and an immediate cover up to remove/ change/fabricate evidence was enacted to prevent loss of face and confidence.
This documentary was shown on British TV ,Channel 4 in ???? 2013 14 15 16. Don't recall exactly which of those years. It may be possible to find the documentary online?
It gets me to this day that Oswald is called the assassin, when there was zero proof he did anything....
Zero proof?.. lol..
Ok, explain to me why or where Oswald discarded his jacket that afternoon?.. And why was his jacket found stuffed under a car in the same Texaco parking lot WE KNOW the killer of Officer Tippit was in too!.. lol..
That jacket hangs Oswald’s ass as a cop killer..
I’m not sold on the official story, and never really was. But c’mon……….no proof? There was plenty of proof. There was loads of it. I don’t know what kind of bulls*** you’ve been reading.
@@jacobjones5269 Did you actually find his jacket there or did the lying MSM tell you.
@@lewscott7511
Lol.. What?!..
Look, dude, I don’t defend cop killers.. That’s where I draw the line..
Take off the tin hat, leave the attic and breath fresh air. Oswald owned the rifle that was left on the 6th floor, where he worked that day. Oswald was the only employee not to return to work after the motorcade. Oswald's wife, who is still alive, admits she took the photo of him holding the rifle in their backyard. That's the same photo that so many attic and basement dwellers, insist is fake.
Oswald did his best to remain silent on his CIA/FBI connections and involvement. He kept saying he was waiting for someone to "come forward and provide legal assistance". I think he was wondering why his handlers hadn't cleared the whole matter up already behind closed doors. So when he said, "I'm just a patsy", I believe he misspoke. I believe he meant to use the word "scapegoat", because he had been in Russia. Ironically, a patsy was precisely what he actually was.
Oswald didn't say one word about any conspiracy to his family, to any cop, or to a TV audience of millions.
There is no evidence he was part of any conspiracy or had any "handlers."
Watch the entire clip and he only says he's a patsy in relation to being hassled by the cops for having lived in Russia, not because he thinks a coup is sacrificing him as the assassin of the President.
@@aaronz7056 If Oswald had been part of a CIA op designed to stage an ATTEMPTED assassination on Kennedy and tie the weapon to Cuba (which it did), an op that somehow went wrong, WOULD Oswald have told his family, a cop or a TV audience? No. He would have done what he did, stay silent (for the time being) and plead for help.
My F-I-L always said he was innocent based on the "death walk" that was broadcast of Ruby shooting Oswald . When I asked why he thought that his response was , "When Oswald stepped out of the doorway he scanned the crowd as he was moving , saw someone that he obviously recognized and his whole demeanor changed . He knew he would not make it through that crowd ." Well we all know who shot him so .......... makes a person ask what ties were between whoever he saw (Ruby ?) , himself and how Ruby figured into it .... wouldnt it ?
th-cam.com/video/kSn1pIozaA4/w-d-xo.html
Oswald was already aware that he was a dead man walking...That's why he cried out, "I'M JUST A PATSY" . Most people would have said , I'm innocent, I didn't do this, but Oswald specifically said he was a Patsy because when he realized it was him , and only him, that was going down for the assassination , he knew he wasn't long for this world . I think it even surprised Oswald how quickly THEY had gotten to him ...But it had to be quick, VERY QUICK, in order to assure that no one else would be implicated in the assassination . THEY succeeded MAGNIFICENTLY , which is a clear sign that people in power were behind it all. Oswald saying that he was a patsy , Ruby saying that he wanted to be taken to Washington to reveal things....These were CLUES that much more went on here than what the public was being told ...Strange that nobody was listening.
There are no doubt multiple theories about the shooting, but I'm beginning to see sense in the idea that it was all staged, just like the movie North By Northwest in the cafeteria of Mount Rushmore. It's too convenient to have all those cameras rolling in front of the actual shooting, and yet it's unclear who did the shooting, because everyone is rushed away the moment it's over. I have a theory that the CIA / FBI didn't like Oswald being held in custody by the Dallas Police, and putting pressure on him to confess, and even hitting them. So they staged the shooting, and might even have used blanks, because they put a dark sweater on Oswald to hide the absense of blood.
Ruby made trips to New Orleans and had meetings with Carlos Marcello crime family and Oswald’s family members had connections to Carlos.
@@dalie95327 Didn't know about Ruby going to N.O. - I'll have to look into that, thanks.
Paraffin test is an old police technique. Oswald would have had to have been wearing gloves up to his elbows. Pre-disposing the test was done correctly and on Oswald.
Fire 3 shots in 8 seconds, with a bolt action rifle wearing gloves up to his elbows, might make things just a little complicated.
HE DID TEST NEGATIVE NOV. 23
Why do you think JFK Jr. named his magazine George? Because that's who killed his dad. George Bush Sr. ran the whole show. It cost Jr. his life also.
Hello Frank. Perhaps you're right. Why would George Herbert Walker Bush want the Kennedys dead? I am reading David Lifton's Best Evidence, Disguise and Deception in the Assassination of John F. Kennedy. The Warren Commission's 26 volume findings seem like a joke. But why Bush? Thanks for your consideration.
Totally
barbaric bastards soulless demons
Interesting! Never heard that theory!
@@scottykay1116 I have a pic from the 1950's of Prescott Bush putting a hat on Richard Nixon with Jack Rubenstein ( Jack Ruby ) standing next to Nixon. There is also a pic of Bush standing outside the TSBD minutes after JFK was killed. Bush head of covert operations and highest ranking CIA member left after JFK fired the top three. -Skull and Bones. Zapruder was Mossad. That is just a start.
Well, I'm certainly glad that you cleared all of that up.
....... and the United States has been in steady decline ever since.
Wow, 2 days ago, I brought this up🤔 my comment was "did you blame the gun when Kennedy was shot?" No, you blamed the man"
Just imagine what two thirty round clips could have done only on semi automatic.
Nice point. If a man with a single shot rifle can assassinate our president, why the hell would we wanna let the next guy use a 50 round drum clip?
@@odalayme guns are meant for a tyrannical government. Let that sink in a minute
@@odalayme because our military has that and better
@@odalayme any more?
Even when Oswald was going through the "red tape" to bring his Russian wife to America, his process was expedited and unusually smooth for a common soldier. The resulting hatred for the name Oswald was so great after Kennedy's assassination that even elementary primers erased innocent stories from them that carried the cursed name.
@Michael Franklin: Notice how official immediately used all three parts of his name...Lee Harvey Oswald. It's a psychological trick to convince people there's only one suspect. I seriously doubt Lee Harvey Oswald, John Wilkes Booth, or James Earl Ray went by, or preferred to be addressed by their first, middle, and last names.
Maybe he wasn't 'a common soldier' and had ties to the CIA which expedited 'his process'?
@@youtuber5305 That's kind of my point. As a patsy, Oswald was already being used by our government. I'm not saying he was innocent or not involved on 11/22/1963.
Might as well forget all about the windshield with the bullet hole in it that the Secret Service ordered to be destroyed at Dearborn, Mi three days after the assassination. Like the people pointing at the grassy knoll, they didn't accept the Beast's story. Even the doctors who saw Kennedy's head wounds were threatened if they talked to the media. A magic bullet? You've got to be kidding. The cop's Dictaphone says otherwise.
Exactly. The policman on the motorcycle behind the limo to the left was hit with blood spatter and brain matter. Jackie jumped on the trunk to gather JFK's brain and when she got to Parkland, she handed it to one of the surgeons either McClellan, the chief surgeon, or Crenshaw. Morbid.
all you need to know is how many of the warren commission members became high ranking elected officials...
and the fact that allen dulles was on the commission!
The evidence that proves who the parties were that were actually involved has been released for quite some time now. Why more people aren't aware of it is a bit odd.
What evidence is that?.. It’s been almost 60 years and I haven’t seen one piece of direct evidence indicating a conspiracy?.. Not one piece.. Nothing..
The truth is surrounded by a bodyguard of lies
Prescott Bush, A. Dulles and GHWB with the help of the military and ok of LBJ.
@@scotttild
Once again, I’m just asking for one piece of direct evidence?.. It’s been almost 60 years, can any of you loons provide that?..
Just one..
@@scotttild Exactly!
If Oswald was who they say he was he would have shot when the vehicles were approaching him. He would not have known if he had another shot with the vehicles going away from him especially with the guards in the vehicle behind Kennedy.
If Oswald had fanatical intent he would have done what Ruby did and fired from within 10 feet with a handgun.
If Oswald shot at the limo while it was approaching him on Houston it would have quickly sped up and gone past him. On Elm it could only go forward and remain in his gunsights for a longer time. Also, the Secret Service would have instantly known exactly where the shots were coming from. Oswald was mad but he wasn't stupid.
@@aaronz7056 What makes you think Oswald was mad?
@@shihyuchu6753 I began to suspect he wasn't entirely stable after he shot three people that day and tried to shoot a fourth when he was arrested.
@@aaronz7056 Evidence please.
Oswald shot Tippit because he realized he was set up for a patsy and was on the run for his life. No way Oswald shot Kennedy
He didnt shoot tippit either , both eye witnesses describe a totally different guy
Lol
Bugs Bunny did it.
G Gordan Libby ( CIA ) shot Tippit for a body double switch for JFK. Tippit is buried in JFK's grave.
G. Gordon Liddy shot Tippit and he botched it. He was supposed to shoot him in the back of the head but got excited and tried to copy the way he had been told JFK was shot. If Charles Nicolette had succeeded in a one shot head shot of JFK from behind Tibbit would not have been killed. What they needed was both a body with a head shot from behind for a lone gunman story and a 100% dead Kennedy. What they had was a dead president with wounds from three different directions so Tippit was supposed to have the "proper" wounds and be switched with JFK.
I wish Oswald had blabbed away and said how he was framed. He was probably a cia informant and was so loyal that he thought he would be saved. A true patsy. I used to think he was one of the shooters but I no longer do.
Asked point blank on live TV if he shot Kennedy, he doesn't make the slightest attempt to blurt out one word about any conspiracy clearly sacrificing him and instead just gives a hollow, rambling reply that all but dodges the question just before complaining the cop he was caught red-handed trying to shoot having had the nerve to hit him.
What if the reason Ruby was selected was he already knew about the cancer. This was 1963 and what if his doctors at the time estimated that he had less than 1 year to live. What if knowing he was on his way out he traded the Oswald hit job for a favor? That he lived for 4 years might be due to a slow moving cancer that his doctors at the time hadn't experienced.
That seems to me to be a plausible and interesing ipoint.
Ruby's cancer wasn't found until shortly before he died.
Zapruder film was cut and pasted so the shot from the front would not show. People who saw the original said so
I heard about that -- while the President's limousine was parked, several members of the press saw a hole in the windshield, before the Secret Service drove it away from the hospital.
It was on the tomorrow show with TomSnyder the original,however I definitely think the deep state killed him but the tape could be controlled opposition if it doesn't show the facts and adds confusion.
Even worse, the time line of the President's shooting is tied to that publicly known Zapruder clip, which runs at about 17 frames per second. Abraham Zapruder's camera had a setting of 24 frames per second, which from a film projector would run at slow motion. So what we see in the Zapruder film is a slow motion film, cut to run at regular speed, with lots and lots of frames missing, because it's a heavily edited reprint, and the original, if still existing, is in CIA storage.
The unaltered Zapruder film has never been released. The released version also does NOT show the limo slowing at all. But, the film taken from across the street shows the limo's brake lights were on, and it came to almost a complete dead stop, before the final head shot. Why did the Agent STOP, instead of flooring it, when gunshots were ringing out??? He only dropped the hammer AFTER the final lethal head shot was administered. Proof??? There is NO WAY a Secret Service agent could have jumped off the following car's running board, instantly accelerated, and ran towards the limo catching it... if they were all going 15 MPH, as the limo driver stated. He would have fell flat on his face the second his first shoe hit the pavement. A extremely fit, well trained, runner MIGHT have been able. But, after being out drinking half the night??? And, wearing dress street shoes??? Yeah... don't think so. Plus, the limo was already accelerating as he was chasing it. There are NOT very many people that can run 20-25 MPH in a suit and dress shoes.....................................
@@donf3877 I noticed the film from the other side facing the grassy knoll - the limo did slow down, although that too was edited. The driver slowed the car before turning his head to see what was going on - and the brief slowdown would have been the opportunity for the SS agent to jump on the car. It's little known that President's limo had another stop before the fatal stretch of road - the car could not make the sharp turn, so stopped, backed up and turned in front of the Texas Book Depository, literally under the 6th floor window. But of course, there was a wait for the car to reach the area in front of the grassy knoll, where all of the crossfire occurred from the Dal-Tex, the grassy knoll, the railroad bridge, School Book Depository, and who know where else.
There is a photograph out there showing Oswald in a completely different place when Kennedy was shot.
share the photograph
Assuming you mean in the entrance of the TSBD, that was Billie Lovelady, as Lovelady himself quickly confirmed at the time.
"There is a photograph out there showing Oswald in a completely different place when Kennedy was shot."
No there isn't. There are two photos that I know of which have been mistakenly claimed to show Oswald. The Altgens photo is one of them, and the man shown in that photo who has been most frequently claimed to be Oswald was irrefutably proven way back in the 1970s to have actually been Billy Lovelady. You are repeating an old, old conspiracy myth that was conclusively debunked more than forty years ago, but which is still today mindlessly regurgitated by some people who have done nothing even remotely similar to proper research on this subject.
The evening of Nov 22 at the press conference at police headquarters, the police chief explaining Oswalds background mentions that LHO was involved with the Cuban Fair play organization. A voice from the back corrects him saying it was the Fair Play for Cuba group. The Tv camera had swung to the back and appeared to show Ruby as the one correcting the police chief. If it truly was Ruby who said that how would a Dallas nightclub operator have known that detail? Had it been announced earlier in the day on the news?
By midnight the day of the assassination the suspect's (Oswald) background, arrest record, etc. had had plenty of time to be looked into by investigators and the media. Oswald's "committee" had already been reported on well before the press conference and in any case several people actually called this out to D.A. Wade, not just Ruby.
@@aaronz7056 I thought it was the captain not DA Wade, might be wrong. However with Oswalds questionable background becoming evident there undoubtedly were concerns where the investigation was going to lead. Any implication of pro Castro Cubans or Soviets would have lead to a very dicey situation, even the Soviets would have been nervous that they would be blamed and what the retaliation would be. If Ruby was assigned to silence Oswald the story could be wrote in a way that nuclear war would be averted.
@@craigstanley3680 If the authorities wanted to silence Oswald they could have killed him behind closed doors or in his cell and made up any story they liked instead of a public execution on live TV that couldn't look fishier and would just raise suspicions of a conspiracy.
Nobody would ever select an unstable blabbermouth with violent mood swings as their "hit man," especially one who throws away his first chance to get his target at the press conference, and who hangs around in line in a Western Union office on a minor errand long after his target was already supposed to have been transferred away.
Anyone else think it's quite the coincidence that Ruby died of cancer? The same thing they had experimented with to take out Castro? 🤔
I always thought it was interesting that when they asked Jackie if she wanted to get out of her bloody dress, she refused and stated “I want the world to see what THEY did.”
Yet, in the 30years she lived after the horrible event neither Jackie, or the President's brother, who lived 45 more years, never gave specifics.
Jackie was just trying to save her own skin as always. She scrambled to get out of the Limo when the fatal shots blew her husbands brains out.
Mob, Cuba, FBI, are deeply involved. Goes all the way to the top LBJ, he wanted Vietnam to continue for various reasons.
It was a coup and Truman knew it and wrote the Dec. 22,1963 anti-CIA letter to the editor of the Washington Post. Remember, Truman fprmed the CIA but found out the bunch of murderers they became! That's why he wrote the letter to the Post and they printed it a month after JFK's murder! It was a coup!
He had to for the Pentagon in order to be re-elected in '64.
@@susanmattinglyhatfield9036 never mind his ownership in Bell helicopter. That was the big factor thus his getting reelected
@@garyblubaugh2517 I thought it was if he sent troops to Vietnam, but I'm going by a scene in the movie, "JFK". I did read about his helicopter and that he was more "affluent" during his campaign than his opponent (can't remember the name), I believe for Senator that he evidently cheated the other guy out of, but my memory is vague.
@@susanmattinglyhatfield9036 Research before assuming something is correct. Daddy Bush was the head guy in Dallas of FBI as well. Was a well conceived cover up of future high level politicians, DOD, mob and Cuban leaders IMO
I just realized that we live in a banana Republic. That's been the real secret since 1963
You know that you're over the target of truth when there's a disclaimer in the description box of the video
I didn't request it and U-Tube states that they did not create it . So who did ?
It was a coup!
Every...damn...time. Glad im not the only one who notices.
No difference between then and now. The powerful are going to do what they want. Everyone knows it and there’s nothing to be done but to “don’t worry, be happy”.
I have seen the 2 retired secret servicemen who were closest to Kennedy interviewed. No way they said. Oswald did it. Its never been explained how Oswald could have got off the 2 shots that were almost simultaneusly.
Victims' reactions in the Zapruder film alone clearly demonstrate 3 shots over 8-9 seconds with several seconds between shots.
@@aaronz7056 in your own mind
@@mikealvord55 Sigh... anybody reading this: just watch the film, assuming it's playing at a realistic speed, count the seconds between JFK and Connally looking around on hearing the first shot [which is what Connally said he did] and the first actual wounding, then count the seconds between the first actual wounding and the fatal head shot, and decide for yourself.
About Jack Ruby -> His real name was Jacob Leon Rubenstein... which he had legally changed to Jack Ruby, less than a year before he shot Oswald.
Every time, eh?
Oswald was killed because dead men tell no tales.
How could it not be "premeditated?" He was stalking oswald days prior posing as media.
"Those boys on the Grassy Knoll were in unmarked graves outside Terlingua within two hours of Kennedy being shot."
How do you know?
"I still have the shovel."
Bull shit.
@@johnd7435 Digital courage much?
@@daffydlwellen1270 Of course--! However, i do confront this nonsense when I hear it every time. It is important to accept well-enough established facts. There's a world to save !
@@johnd7435 Important to parrot the lies, hey?
60 years later and "The Government" still refuses to release the documents.
@@daffydlwellen1270 In everyday life, I also deal with the made-up facts in an opposing way, most of the time. Conspiracy crazies are everywhere. Many of them also believe in Bigfoot. All the ideas are wrong, lacking in honest research; just repeated fairy tales. This includes the idiot 911 truthers.
Oswalds finger prints were never found on the Carcano rifle. A partial palm print was found on the gun AFTER his death. Would he have time to wipe down the rifle and get down to the lunchroom before the cop and supervisor showed up?
Lies on your part.
@@johnd7435 Facts
They have sworn testimony of mortician at the funeral home where Oswald body was at the fbi came and took palm print of Oswald by placing Oswald’s hand on stock of rifle.
@@charliewebster8555 They didn't put Oswald's palm on the rifle, they put his palm on an ink pad. Still highly suspicious.
You are lying; plain and simple. Keep fantasizing if you like-- No sworn testimony--got it?
If voting mattered they wouldn't let you do it. - Mark Twain
When the eight (8) shots were fired on November 22, 1963, Lee Oswald was standing in front of the School Book Depository toward the left corner of the building. Look around ... there's a PIC of him at that location. Investigations could never create a timeline for Oswald to get from the 6th floor to the 2nd floor where he was observed by an officer. That's because they were working it backwards. Had they worked it where Oswald was coming from the street, the timeline would have reconciled. But then again, they had already assigned Oswald as the shooter even before a shot was fired.
There were 4 or 5 shots - that has been researched - read last seconds in Dallas.
@@michaelcamuso5437 Michael, I did some work for the people who were directly involved. Forget what you think you know.
1st shot fired vertical from atop the SBD to launch roosting pigeons on the Hertz and Chevrolets (yes Chevrolets sign, look at the photo, it's the only time you will ever see that sign spelled that way, ever). The shot was fired to draw attention to the open window by street viewers. It was fired from a 1911 Colt Commander. The .45 ACP bullet was retrieved the next day from the lawn across from the SBD.
2nd shot fired from the left opening of the railroad trestle by Charlie Harrelson. The bullet went through the windshield of the Limo just below the rear view mirror, then through JFK's throat.
3rd shot fired from the Daltex Building across Houston St. from the SBD completely missed its target and hit the curb.
4th shot hit JFK in the middle of the back. Fired from the Daltex Building.
5th shot hit John Connolly. Daltex Bldg.
6th shot hit John Connolly. Daltex Bldg.
7th & 8th shots:
7th shot hit JFK in the back of the head. It was fired from the Daltex building.
8th shot hit JFK in the right front of the head. The impact of shots 7 & 8 are within 8/10 second apart. It was fired from the Grassy Knoll by Jim Files using a scoped .221 Fireball. The bullet had been drilled and filled with liquid mercury to generate hydro-shock. After firing, Files ejected the shell casing, bit down on it, and tossed it across the fence. This is a trademark of Jim Files, and the bullet was found at the site, with the bite mark.
Now: The SBD. On the 6th floor, there were three people. In the open window were a man with black skin and Malcolm Wallace (LBJ's personal assassin, you can read about him). Wallace was photo ID'ed by two witnesses upon leaving the building. The 3rd man was positioned at the opposite end of the building as a shooter, but did not fire as he had no shot opportunity.
Now: The Zapruder Film. Think you've seen it? Look again, closely. Try to see the back of JFK's head. You can't. It's been blacked out (look close). Likely only 10 people have ever seen the actual footage. The government paid $150,000 for it from the Zapruder family (via Look Magazine).
Now: There was yesterday, today, and tomorrow. From this day forward, never under any circumstance believe "anything" your government tells you.
@@richardgreen7811 Thanks you Richard, this is fascinating. Thanks for taking the time. I will keep researching. Be well.
@@michaelcamuso5437 Of course. Finding out what actually happened then is not, and was not difficult at the time. In New Orleans, they were actually quite open about Project Big Event. After "W" dies, lots of information will be forthcoming. Remember, W was one of the 4 US Presidents in Dealy Plaza that day.
That was Billie Lovelady, who soon came forward. This story of Oswald being that guy in the doorway photo was debunked generations ago.
The logical question would be : how could Ruby be so sure that Oswald was murderer ? He was still just a suspect ?
You call that evidence ?!
@@TNT-km2egnot evidence, but it's a valid point. Regardless, to think Ruby did this to avenge the killing of JFK is naive.
I can't imagine the ongoing pain to the Kennedy family.
The agents that usually stand on the running boards were "called off" when JFK left the airport, why?
So they wouldn't be hurt when the bullets were flying, and would have fewer men protecting the president.
@@rickemmons7300 Exactly what I was thinking.
I have been watching stuff on the JFK assasination for a long time and literally just saw that video a few days ago! I already 100% believed it was a conspiracy, they had everything planned out to the smallest detail.