Single Sideband: Where do those extra harmonics come from? (036b)

แชร์
ฝัง
  • เผยแพร่เมื่อ 21 ธ.ค. 2024

ความคิดเห็น • 35

  • @markawbolton
    @markawbolton 3 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

    Beautifully clear explanation. When I first enountered thei i imagined .. "What if the Audio signal was a pure sign wave But all of a sudden it went into bad clipping so it looked like a square wave - Yup harmonics everywhere - then you feel that into your modulator and what you get is a acurate "square" wave represented by the harmonics ... modulated onto the carrier wave. ... then just take it from there ... Only you used crossover distortion - equally as validlidly ... the wrapped it up with a bow and expalaned how carrier distortion gives you a "signal' at twice the carrier. Nicely put Sir !!!

    • @eie_for_you
      @eie_for_you  3 หลายเดือนก่อน

      Thank you! 🙂

  • @samuellourenco1050
    @samuellourenco1050 3 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

    Very well explained and presented. Thanks!

    • @eie_for_you
      @eie_for_you  3 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

      Thank you! I'm glad it "hit that spot". 🙂

  • @uni-byte
    @uni-byte 3 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

    Very well presented in a nice succinct fashion. Kudos.

    • @eie_for_you
      @eie_for_you  3 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

      Thank you so much! 🙂

  • @DennisG-h4v
    @DennisG-h4v 2 หลายเดือนก่อน

    Very educational Channel

    • @eie_for_you
      @eie_for_you  2 หลายเดือนก่อน

      Thanks, man! 🙂

  • @W1RMD
    @W1RMD 3 หลายเดือนก่อน

    Outstanding presentation! Great picture of you in your "Johnny Novice" days! That looked like some great equipment. Vintage by even back then's standards. Take care and 73!

    • @eie_for_you
      @eie_for_you  3 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

      Yeah, it was some really OLD stuff when I got it. 5 pin tubes in the transmitter! (the old, trusty 807s).
      Thanks, man! 🙂

    • @W1RMD
      @W1RMD 3 หลายเดือนก่อน

      @@eie_for_you Great stuff! 1970 was a great year as that's when my sweetheart was born! They made real radios and real women back then! Ha Ha! Take care.

    • @eie_for_you
      @eie_for_you  3 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

      @@W1RMD Love it!

  • @anlpereira
    @anlpereira 3 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

    Always in the first line hehehe. Great explanation Ralph.

    • @eie_for_you
      @eie_for_you  3 หลายเดือนก่อน

      Thank you! 🙂

    • @anlpereira
      @anlpereira 3 หลายเดือนก่อน

      @@eie_for_you please make some video showing how you make these videos edition on Davinci Resolve. I would like to start to post something in my channel in portuguese. I really want to share the knowledge I have. Thanks

    • @eie_for_you
      @eie_for_you  3 หลายเดือนก่อน

      @@anlpereira Yes, DaVinci is a totally awesome program!! Good choice!
      As I was learning, this guy, Casey Faris, was a God send (www.youtube.com/@CaseyFaris). Also Jason Yadlovski (www.youtube.com/@JasonYadlovski).
      These will get you past the technical aspects of using DaVinci.
      You can begin by using a cell phone or simple video camera to record. I have gradually moved up. I record my audio separately and put the video and audio together in DaVinci (it'll do it automatically).
      Hope this helps. 🙂

  • @IbrahimMaktuf
    @IbrahimMaktuf 3 หลายเดือนก่อน +2

    Thank you

    • @eie_for_you
      @eie_for_you  3 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

      You are very welcome! 🙂

  • @ornithopterindia
    @ornithopterindia 3 หลายเดือนก่อน

    👍Thank you sir.

    • @eie_for_you
      @eie_for_you  3 หลายเดือนก่อน

      You are welcome! 🙂

  • @citizenrich
    @citizenrich 3 หลายเดือนก่อน

    Great explanation

    • @eie_for_you
      @eie_for_you  3 หลายเดือนก่อน

      Thanks! 🙂

  • @davidluther3955
    @davidluther3955 2 หลายเดือนก่อน

    EXCELLENT PRESENTATION!IS THIS WHAT YOU CALL THE FOURIER SERIES REPRESENTED HERE?

    • @eie_for_you
      @eie_for_you  2 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

      Well ... actually, this is simply the trigonometric multiplication of the two signals as defined. The output of the Fourier is in the form f(x) (frequency domain) and this is in the form A(t) (amplitude at any time, t, a time domain representation).
      We could apply the Fourier analysis to it to yield the frequency components from this time domain function, but with the frequency components so obviously represented in the time domain function, to do so might be a fun thing to do, but not very productive. 🙂

  • @Mamamia12384
    @Mamamia12384 3 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

    Interesting that the noise floor goes slightly toward the main carrier frequency.

    • @eie_for_you
      @eie_for_you  3 หลายเดือนก่อน

      Yes, this is quite interesting. To some extent, this is due to the RBW of the spectrum analyzer ... but maybe there is more to it? 🙂

    • @Mamamia12384
      @Mamamia12384 3 หลายเดือนก่อน

      @@eie_for_you ​Most likely both the non linearity of the transmitter and the rbw of the spectrum analyser

    • @eie_for_you
      @eie_for_you  3 หลายเดือนก่อน

      @@Mamamia12384 That was my theory as well. 🙂

  • @williamna5800
    @williamna5800 3 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

    I think I've learned something, though I'm not sure :)

    • @eie_for_you
      @eie_for_you  3 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

      That is a good thing ... always learning! 🙂

  • @justin8894
    @justin8894 3 หลายเดือนก่อน

    Oh boy. I’ll never understand.

    • @eie_for_you
      @eie_for_you  3 หลายเดือนก่อน

      😞 Sorry to hear that this is giving you such difficulties. Suffice it to say ... if everything is perfect, there is just the two sideband pips. If something is not perfect ( in other words, not perfectly linear), then there will be more sideband pips. Being that we live in a world with imperfect everything, we have to live with at least some extraneous sideband pips. 🙂