11/12.3 Internal Energy, Enthalpy, and Cp/Cv

แชร์
ฝัง
  • เผยแพร่เมื่อ 5 ก.ย. 2024

ความคิดเห็น • 5

  • @melissastan6884
    @melissastan6884 4 ปีที่แล้ว

    Hi Chad,
    In my textbook, it stated that the equation is delta U = Q - W, but you wrote delta U = Q + W. Is it supposed to be + or - W. If it is -W could you please explain why we are subtracting W from Q. Thanks. Awesome videos by the way.

    • @ChadsPrep
      @ChadsPrep  4 ปีที่แล้ว +4

      Hello Melissa! You'll see this presented two ways depending upon the textbook.
      dU = Q + W where W is defined as -PdV and therefore dU = Q - PdV.
      The second way is dU = Q - W where W is defined as +PdV and therefore dU = Q - PdV.
      So they both lead to the same equation but differ in how work is defined.
      In the first (the one I use) work is defined relative to the system. When the system gains energy work is positive and when the system loses energy work is negative.
      But in the second work is defined as work that can be performed by the system. When work can be extracted from the system (and performed on the surroundings) it is defined as positive, but when work is done on the system by the surroundings it is defined as negative.
      So one focuses on the system itself whereas the second focuses on what can be done by the system. My apologies for the confusion but I didn't create it, we're just left to deal with it. Happy Studying!

  • @gerardo5211
    @gerardo5211 4 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    DH= DU + P(DV), P should be constant so no delta is neded

    • @ChadsPrep
      @ChadsPrep  4 ปีที่แล้ว +2

      Correct Gerardo! H = U + PV so DH = DU + D(PV)
      This is often expanded to DH = DU + PDV + VDP
      But we often consider examples carried out at constant pressure in which case DP = 0 and therefore DH = DU + PDV
      You can actually expand this out further by substituting in for DU (DU = q+w) to show that DH = q at constant pressure.
      Happy Studying!

    • @gerardo5211
      @gerardo5211 4 ปีที่แล้ว

      Chad's Prep ok I get it, you explain very good, thank you for your videos!