Skeleton: largest teeth to skull ratio of any known dinosaur; name suggests dangerous nature Art: universally adorable; big eyes make me ape brain think "hmm, feather infant... Me nurture like puppy"
Yes and really good amount of information in this episode. Dinosaurians are almost always thought in context of the giants, but like mammals there are more species of small to mid size Dinosaurs than the giants. Unfortunately, their size makes them more difficult to convert to fossils. It's good that you can highlight these much smaller cousins. 🦊👍👍👍
It's just that we should have more info on that soft tissue found inside that petrified (?) bone that made so much news. Then nothing. What's the story?
great video. i've never heard of this animal before. one of the things i love about learning pre-history is just stumbling across some new and strange animal and seeing what other creatures it was related or evolved into. fascinating and saddening all at the same time, as we'll never truly know what these animals looked or acted like, and it's the same feeling i get when learning about ancient cultures since we'll never know everything there despite it being so much closer to us
Because we don't know exactly what they looked or acted like, therein lies the fun! The fun of research, investigation, finding the clues and connecting the dots, with eventual conclusions, then putting the pieces together, to find a picture that has otherwise been lost to time. Maybe I'm just a nerd, but what kind of study, could be more exhilarating, than that? I mean, a fossil is basically a screanshot from history, oftentimes tens of millions, even hundreds of millions of years ago. It's fascinating. I don't know, maybe I'm just a hands on kind of person. I enjoy the work part. The not knowing something, is a big part of that. I love not knowing. I think knowing everything would be the most boring state of existence I could imagine.
Very interesting! We almost never hear about basal dinosaurs. By the way, as an English diphthong, the “ae” Latin digraph is pronounced like our long “i,” so I think dye-MON-o-saw-roos is closest to Linnaean usage.
That drawing makes it look like it is deformed like a cleft palate or the skull was broken and flattened. So really it has a bad under bite so it lower jaw pokes out more.
They're theropods, because they only have 3 fingers. The Triassic period was much longer ago most remains aren't going to be found that far back for various reasons, so there was probably more variety of dinosaurs their remains just haven't been found
Does this species has more fossils??? Bcause i was thinking, and im not expert at nothing Just curious, could It b some sort of deformation from birth? I mean i saw chicks who where born with some like feet pointing to his body instead of front, a wing being shorter than the other, etc... Anyway awesome video, im subscribing
is it possible that the reason their teeth are so weird is that the Dino was in the process of losing all it's baby teeth? I'm not sure if they even have baby teeth but with my limited knowledge it seems plausible?
Quite possible. I know cats can get real interesting looking teeth while their adult ones are comming in. Cats also often have a double fang phase they go through before the baby fangs fall out. Something similar would explain this critters seemingly mismatched teeth.
@@lorefreak94 Cats are mammals. We're talking about dinosaurs, and dinosaurs are reptiles. Usually, reptiles with teeth either have the same set for their entire life, or their teeth are continually lost and replaced during the course of their life. So OP's hypothesis might be inaccurate.
Yeah? That's your own bias speaking. It's unscientific to do so, if there is no evidence for it. Even moreso if you slap feathers and lips onto animals, that are not from the very derrived, late Cretaceous Theropod lineage. The already dodgy 'phylogenetic entanglement' argument is completely impotent here. If you like dinosaurs dranw in that style, fine. But don't pretend it's somehow scientific more accurate to slap lips and feathers onto literally anything.
@@Scipionyxsam Nevertheless there is a growing body of evidence for both ...if YOU haven't read or seen it that makes no difference it's there...unless you just want your usual gaming dinos?
"phylogenetic entanglement" isn't a term. Are you referring to phylogenetic bracketing? Because there are not any fossilized scale impressions of early dinosaurs either. And as mentioned in another, comment, a paper from a few years ago found that some early dinosaurs couldn't survive without feathers.
@@chimerasuchus I'm ESL you'll have to excuse my mistakes. I don't speak your mother tongue as well as you do. I mixed up the terms from our respective languages. Mea culpa. See I adressed your points in the other comment section.
Daemonosaurus means Daemon (Demon) lizard. Daemon: noun 1. (in ancient Greek belief) a divinity or supernatural being of a nature between gods and humans. 2. archaic spelling of demon1
Interesting soo many imaginative animal haha... Anyway even though unreally sure about the existence of this beast but its fun wild fantasy though 🤡..⭐👍
@@tjarkschweizer It's extremely implausible. This is a basal dinosaur living more than 100 million years, before feathers became widespread and that only in a very specific branch of derived theropods which he is not even part of. There is no evidence for it and no phylogenetic entanglement, that would even vaguely imply such a look. It's an unscientific paleoart trend to slap feathers onto everything. Nothing more.
The presence of feathers in the first dinosaurs is more than mere speculation. Feathers appear in three of the four major ornithodiran clades (Theropoda, Ornithischia, and Pterosauria), which suggests they could be ancestral to the clade. With their ancestrally small body size and high metabolism, the thermal insulation provided by feathers would have been, at the very least, quiet helpful for the first ornithodirans. Obviously, there were dinosaurs that were fully or mostly scaly. However, these are almost entirely large species who would not have not benefitted from the thermal insulation provided by feathers. Worse, it would have greatly increased their risk of overheating. So any dinosaur evolving large body size would need to loss, or at least heavily reduce, any feathers they had. We know for a fact this happened in some dinosaur lineages, like the tyrannosaurids, who were the direct descendants of fully feather species. A similar trend in seen in today's mammals, with large species in warm environment being a lot less hairy than relatives that are smaller in live in cooler environments. Even ostriches have fewer feathers than most other birds. Additionally, the first members of the the Sauropodomorphs, the fourth major ornithodiran clade, with preserved integument were already massive enough to require a mostly scaly body. Therefore, there is a reasonable chance feathers were present in the first dinosaurs. Of course it is not certain that the first dinosaurs had feathers, but neither is it certain that they were predominantly scaly. Both are valid hypothesizes, which is reflected in the art in this video
When more taxa are added Daemonosaurus nests firmly with Jeholosaurus, and they nest as sisters to Chilesaurus at the base of the Ornithischia, just a node away from the base of the Sauropodomorpha within the Phytodinosauria. Cladogram here: reptileevolution.com/reptile-tree.htm
oh yes wierd triassic dinosaur equivalent opossum from pangea and ps: why plaeoart is daemonosaurus look like wtf cursed image omg. this it look dino say kill me or shave me!
what the hell is what if daemonosaurus is last herrerasaurid. but why have fur? and no look not scaly skin and not lipless ala style opossum and sabertooth cats. hell yes or no it wierd!
![ออกพรรษาน้ำตาหล่น - แอน อรดี [OFFICIAL MV]](http://i.ytimg.com/vi/PFZtOcY9ONA/mqdefault.jpg)
Imagine finding out millions of years later you’ve been named “buck tooth evil lizard”
Typical mammals...
How embarrassing
@@roccotaco1843 imagine if that was its original nickname by the other dinosaurs…
🤣😁hey
that's a best case scenario, really
Skeleton: largest teeth to skull ratio of any known dinosaur; name suggests dangerous nature
Art: universally adorable; big eyes make me ape brain think "hmm, feather infant... Me nurture like puppy"
"Daemonosaurus" sounds like a dinosaur metal band name.
The black & white one looks adorkable 🤣
I'm very interested in triassic fauna, so I greatly appreciate your making of this video.
Such a cute derpy Dino. Thanks for the knowledge! Your efforts are Appreciated!
De(uh...uh...)... THE DEMONITIZATION LIZARD
😂q
Groanasaurus...
Prohucomceratops
Quality joke right here
Yes and really good amount of information in this episode. Dinosaurians are almost always thought in context of the giants, but like mammals there are more species of small to mid size Dinosaurs than the giants. Unfortunately, their size makes them more difficult to convert to fossils. It's good that you can highlight these much smaller cousins. 🦊👍👍👍
Perhaps it's teeth and hooked upper jaw indicates it was a fish eater
I think it might have been a baby eater. I dont think the teeth look suited for fish. They look like they are too far apart but i might be wrong
That was my first thought as well but nothing else about it says fish eater.
Great presentation - thanks a lot for creating & uploading!
Ok, this is one of my favourite dinosaurs now
Now that I've been following your channel I suddenly have the desire to sculpt some dinosaur models.💓🦕🦖
Hopefully some more specimens of Daemonosaurus will be found to give us a more accurate classification.
The big eye sockets in the skull suggest that it may have been nocturnal, or so I'm led to believe from other species with the same trait.
or maybe it lived in forests that are roofed by big trees
OMG that's one of the cutest things I've ever seen!
Consistently solid, well researched, and concise content. Subbed!
I love Daemon it a really cool unusual dinosaur and I love this video
I am glad you enjoyed it.
It's just that we should have more info on that soft tissue found inside that petrified (?) bone that made so much news. Then nothing. What's the story?
Contamination
02:53 *Error!* this paleoart was made by Brian Engh. Not by mark witton.
Fantastic video as always
The artwork presented is masterful and compelling and the dissertation is quite marvelous!
Love it that was great thanks for posting!
1:07 utahraptor: am i a joke to you?
Daemonosaurus smiling be like: 😁😁😁😁😬😬😬😬
Great video!
great video. i've never heard of this animal before.
one of the things i love about learning pre-history is just stumbling across some new and strange animal and seeing what other creatures it was related or evolved into.
fascinating and saddening all at the same time, as we'll never truly know what these animals looked or acted like, and it's the same feeling i get when learning about ancient cultures since we'll never know everything there despite it being so much closer to us
Because we don't know exactly what they looked or acted like, therein lies the fun! The fun of research, investigation, finding the clues and connecting the dots, with eventual conclusions, then putting the pieces together, to find a picture that has otherwise been lost to time.
Maybe I'm just a nerd, but what kind of study, could be more exhilarating, than that? I mean, a fossil is basically a screanshot from history, oftentimes tens of millions, even hundreds of millions of years ago. It's fascinating.
I don't know, maybe I'm just a hands on kind of person. I enjoy the work part. The not knowing something, is a big part of that. I love not knowing. I think knowing everything would be the most boring state of existence I could imagine.
Great video! I liked flight stugs narration!
Very interesting! We almost never hear about basal dinosaurs.
By the way, as an English diphthong, the “ae” Latin digraph is pronounced like our long “i,” so I think dye-MON-o-saw-roos is closest to Linnaean usage.
Me: looking at dinosaur informative video
My parakeets: Did you forget we are dinosaur as well !!!?
I never wanted to pet a dinosaur so bad.
Awesome explained with that large teeth carnivorous Triassic dinosaurs 🔧🔧🔧
Expectation: demon lizard
Reality: just a little guy
The Triassic Period has a huge number of weird animals, and triassic weird is really weird. IMHO. 0:14
I just realised who the thumbnail reminds me of: Dwayne Dibley from Red Dwarf.
th-cam.com/video/QBIWMgPZo2Q/w-d-xo.html
🤣🤣🤣🤣
1:25 So cute. My chickens look at me like that.
@JZ's Best Friend I don't think they're under the impression they'll be bigger than me one day. I think they're just hoping for food treats.
So cool!
My parakeets told me they want to be a pair of daemonosaurs for Halloween this year and I better start on their costumes early.
What a cute little dork XD
Awesome video, just subscribed
The art in this video
Nice
Bruh you sound so similar to your brother haha great video tho 👍
Wait, who's his brother?
Flipped StuG, the narrator in this video.
I like this narrators voice…somewhat less extremely nasal
It's so cute!
That drawing makes it look like it is deformed like a cleft palate or the skull was broken and flattened. So really it has a bad under bite so it lower jaw pokes out more.
cool video
Thank you.
@@chimerasuchus your welcome
I wonder what Daemon Targaryen would think of this dinosaur.
Fuccer got named demon lizard.
Daemonothauruth
The teeth would have been covered. Lips are the norm in tetrapods.
There is no evidence for that assumption
The norm? Never heard of that in my life
Only one big teeth small dinosaurs of all 👑
They're theropods, because they only have 3 fingers. The Triassic period was much longer ago most remains aren't going to be found that far back for various reasons, so there was probably more variety of dinosaurs their remains just haven't been found
they didnt find arms, neck, ribs, and skull.
Zero arm material for Daemonosaurus.
Thanx!
With the eye socket so big... Makes me wonder if this was a night creature. And if this was the case what it would it feed on.
Does this species has more fossils??? Bcause i was thinking, and im not expert at nothing Just curious, could It b some sort of deformation from birth? I mean i saw chicks who where born with some like feet pointing to his body instead of front, a wing being shorter than the other, etc... Anyway awesome video, im subscribing
Right now there is only one Daemonosaurus specimen, so it being a mutant is not impossible.
Forward facing teeth would be effective at consuming eggs
PRO BIRB
A bit slow to Primeval New World.
They should have named it “Derposaurous”
Could it have been nocturnal judging from the skull?
Looks like the far side comic "nerd dinosaurs".
I want a Daemonsaurus pet
is it possible that the reason their teeth are so weird is that the Dino was in the process of losing all it's baby teeth? I'm not sure if they even have baby teeth but with my limited knowledge it seems plausible?
Quite possible. I know cats can get real interesting looking teeth while their adult ones are comming in. Cats also often have a double fang phase they go through before the baby fangs fall out. Something similar would explain this critters seemingly mismatched teeth.
@@lorefreak94 Cats are mammals. We're talking about dinosaurs, and dinosaurs are reptiles. Usually, reptiles with teeth either have the same set for their entire life, or their teeth are continually lost and replaced during the course of their life. So OP's hypothesis might be inaccurate.
So glad to see lips and feathers on dinos....
Yeah? That's your own bias speaking. It's unscientific to do so, if there is no evidence for it. Even moreso if you slap feathers and lips onto animals, that are not from the very derrived, late Cretaceous Theropod lineage. The already dodgy 'phylogenetic entanglement' argument is completely impotent here.
If you like dinosaurs dranw in that style, fine. But don't pretend it's somehow scientific more accurate to slap lips and feathers onto literally anything.
@@Scipionyxsam did I say "scientific"? no I did not
@@Scipionyxsam Nevertheless there is a growing body of evidence for both ...if YOU haven't read or seen it that makes no difference it's there...unless you just want your usual gaming dinos?
"phylogenetic entanglement" isn't a term. Are you referring to phylogenetic bracketing? Because there are not any fossilized scale impressions of early dinosaurs either. And as mentioned in another, comment, a paper from a few years ago found that some early dinosaurs couldn't survive without feathers.
@@chimerasuchus I'm ESL you'll have to excuse my mistakes. I don't speak your mother tongue as well as you do. I mixed up the terms from our respective languages. Mea culpa.
See I adressed your points in the other comment section.
Timmy Turner the Dinosaur
This dinosaur seriously went 🤓
When orodromeus in the isle decides to take revenge on players
Can you make a vid about the suchosaurus please
I feel familiar with the narrator's voice
Just couldn't pin point the name.
When will you have a Deinosuchus video?
*Let the Sunshine In.*
Daemonosaurus means Daemon (Demon) lizard.
Daemon: noun
1.
(in ancient Greek belief) a divinity or supernatural being of a nature between gods and humans.
2.
archaic spelling of demon1
Some primitive dinosaurs have feathers and their some descendants have no feather is similar to Elephant, Rhino, and Hippo are hairless mammals?
Possible use of the front part of the jaw
To intimate attacks upon prey
A first hold so to speak
Yes
I'm reaching
Buck toothed evil spirit is a wonder
Cuteasaurus
Is this... an IRL Scorpios rex?
So they had to tell why they weren't in school and had to show their ID all the time.
Interesting soo many imaginative animal haha... Anyway even though unreally sure about the existence of this beast but its fun wild fantasy though 🤡..⭐👍
CHimerasuchis, could it not be a dinosaur? Could it be closer to Effigia okeeffeae?
Probably not. There are no features linking Daemonosaurus to the poposauroids but many shared with other early dinosaurs.
It is pronounced "day-MAW-nuh-SOAR-us". It was a carnivore, and a theropod. It's name actually means "demon lizard".
Looks like venom raptor
Why would they draw an early dinosaur as fully feathered?
It is a real possibility. So, why not? Just a little bit of speculation.
@@tjarkschweizer It's extremely implausible. This is a basal dinosaur living more than 100 million years, before feathers became widespread and that only in a very specific branch of derived theropods which he is not even part of.
There is no evidence for it and no phylogenetic entanglement, that would even vaguely imply such a look.
It's an unscientific paleoart trend to slap feathers onto everything. Nothing more.
The presence of feathers in the first dinosaurs is more than mere speculation. Feathers appear in three of the four major ornithodiran clades (Theropoda, Ornithischia, and Pterosauria), which suggests they could be ancestral to the clade. With their ancestrally small body size and high metabolism, the thermal insulation provided by feathers would have been, at the very least, quiet helpful for the first ornithodirans.
Obviously, there were dinosaurs that were fully or mostly scaly. However, these are almost entirely large species who would not have not benefitted from the thermal insulation provided by feathers. Worse, it would have greatly increased their risk of overheating. So any dinosaur evolving large body size would need to loss, or at least heavily reduce, any feathers they had. We know for a fact this happened in some dinosaur lineages, like the tyrannosaurids, who were the direct descendants of fully feather species. A similar trend in seen in today's mammals, with large species in warm environment being a lot less hairy than relatives that are smaller in live in cooler environments. Even ostriches have fewer feathers than most other birds.
Additionally, the first members of the the Sauropodomorphs, the fourth major ornithodiran clade, with preserved integument were already massive enough to require a mostly scaly body. Therefore, there is a reasonable chance feathers were present in the first dinosaurs.
Of course it is not certain that the first dinosaurs had feathers, but neither is it certain that they were predominantly scaly. Both are valid hypothesizes, which is reflected in the art in this video
I wondered the same thing. Is there any actual evidence of feathers from that early?
Because artists follow trends.
fredditarus mercurysaurus
You pronounce daemon wrong. It’s “deemon”. Great vid tho. Subbed
🦕🦖
Issa bb t rex
@Red Robotic they're born like that, with adult arms and then just grow into them. The genes for the arms stopped evolving eons before.
Prolly first stem flyer's
The Ghost Ranch in Arizona?
It is in New Mexico.
Don't dilophosaurus and even big ones like spinosaurus and other fish-eating dinosaurs have such teeth in the front?
Their teeth weren't that big compared to skull size and they weren't sticking out at such an angle.
Who narrated the video? I didn’t understand the name :(
Flipped StuG. He used to make videos about a game called War Thunder.
When more taxa are added Daemonosaurus nests firmly with Jeholosaurus, and they nest as sisters to Chilesaurus at the base of the Ornithischia, just a node away from the base of the Sauropodomorpha within the Phytodinosauria. Cladogram here: reptileevolution.com/reptile-tree.htm
diNoSauR
oh yes wierd triassic dinosaur equivalent opossum from pangea and ps: why plaeoart is daemonosaurus look like wtf cursed image omg. this it look dino say kill me or shave me!
Welcome back to the biggest freakshow that ever existed. The Triassic Period.
Naw hell naw fr british dino naww no way
Sorry, but I don't find the new narration to be as engaging.
what the hell is what if daemonosaurus is last herrerasaurid. but why have fur? and no look not scaly skin and not lipless ala style opossum and sabertooth cats. hell yes or no it wierd!