Probably not for the 3 at the back as I tend to not start with this and simply promote either a CB or a WB if we're not under a high press. Other than that I'm not a fan. I do like the 2323 though so I'll do that at some point.
@@hockey4life418 Excellent, I look forward to watching it. While I too am a fan of 4 at the back, my intrigue around 3 at the back systems comes from the fact the majority of international teams seem to set up this way. Would love to know more. Your videos on formations and positioning are the best I've found online (Including some of the subscription based coaching services). Really helping me get back into the sport after almost 15 years away!
![CAMPปลิ้น | รวม Highlight 2024! PART [1/2]](http://i.ytimg.com/vi/6hnvNnvYloU/mqdefault.jpg)
Thisn formation indeed makes the two presses easy to do! Great explanation thank you
Any videos planned for 3 at the back systems? Or what about 2-3-2-3?
Probably not for the 3 at the back as I tend to not start with this and simply promote either a CB or a WB if we're not under a high press. Other than that I'm not a fan. I do like the 2323 though so I'll do that at some point.
@@hockey4life418 Excellent, I look forward to watching it.
While I too am a fan of 4 at the back, my intrigue around 3 at the back systems comes from the fact the majority of international teams seem to set up this way. Would love to know more.
Your videos on formations and positioning are the best I've found online (Including some of the subscription based coaching services). Really helping me get back into the sport after almost 15 years away!
Which programming did you use for this? I mean the hockey pitch. Thanks
@@jonastermijtelen7723 hi. I made it all in ms PowerPoint
What about the 3-4-3 formation. Known as the diamond midfield formation
I don't tend to play with a back 3 but I'm sure it can be a great formation
Interested to know what type of software/ programme you are using? Excellent video thank you
Microsoft PowerPoint