^=read as to the power *=read as square root As per question 3^(x+4) - 4^(x+3)=0 So, 3^(x+4)=4^(x+3) (3^x). (3^4)=(4^x). (4^3) (3^x)/(4^x) =(4^3)/(3^4) (3/4)^x ={4^3/3^3}×(1/3) (3/4)^x={(4/3)^3}×(1/3) {(3/4)^x}/{(3/4)^-3}=(1/3) (3/4)^(x+3)=1/3 Take the log log{(3/4)^(x+3)}=log(1/3) (X+3)×log(3/4)=log(1/3) X+3=log(3/4)/log(1/3) X=(-3)+{log(3/4)/log(1/3)} X=(-3)+{(log3-log4)/(log1-log3)} =(-3)+{(log3-log4)/(0-log3) =(-3)+{(log3-log4)/(-log3)} =(-3)+{(log3/-log3)+(log4/log3)} =(-3-1)+(log4/log3) =(-4)+(log4/log3) =(-4)+{log4 of base 3)....May be
The path was right but the result is false: you made a mistake in line 11: (X+3)×log(3/4)=log(1/3) is not equivalent to X+3=log(3/4)/log(1/3) but this does: (X+3)×log(3/4)=log(1/3) X+3=log(1/3)/log(3/4) and I prefer your way :) No bases of 3/4 and no conversions from base 3/4 to base 10
This was the way I did it and I got the right answer x=0.8188… within two minutes. Not 0.8168 as this idiot. And I call him an idiot because he is making calculations for nearly a1/4 hour that don't bring him any closer to the result, not because he pressed the wrong key at one instance.
Why not use the natural logarithm right at the first step ? I got to the same conclusion within 4 steps
3^(n+4)-4^(n+3)=0
3^(n+4)=4^(n+3)
81(3ⁿ)=64(4ⁿ)
(¾)ⁿ=64/81
(¾)ⁿ=(8/9)²
n=2[log_¾(8/9)] ❤
X=3 +(ln3)/(ln(3/4)
2. log (8/9) na base 3/4, para ser mais exato
😊wow!! Nice!!
You got it wrong. It’s x=0.81884 not 0.8168
It too simple to use log straight away and
x= [4Ln(3)-3Ln(4)]/[Ln(4)-Ln(3)]
^=read as to the power
*=read as square root
As per question
3^(x+4) - 4^(x+3)=0
So,
3^(x+4)=4^(x+3)
(3^x). (3^4)=(4^x). (4^3)
(3^x)/(4^x) =(4^3)/(3^4)
(3/4)^x ={4^3/3^3}×(1/3)
(3/4)^x={(4/3)^3}×(1/3)
{(3/4)^x}/{(3/4)^-3}=(1/3)
(3/4)^(x+3)=1/3
Take the log
log{(3/4)^(x+3)}=log(1/3)
(X+3)×log(3/4)=log(1/3)
X+3=log(3/4)/log(1/3)
X=(-3)+{log(3/4)/log(1/3)}
X=(-3)+{(log3-log4)/(log1-log3)}
=(-3)+{(log3-log4)/(0-log3)
=(-3)+{(log3-log4)/(-log3)}
=(-3)+{(log3/-log3)+(log4/log3)}
=(-3-1)+(log4/log3)
=(-4)+(log4/log3)
=(-4)+{log4 of base 3)....May be
The path was right but the result is false:
you made a mistake in line 11:
(X+3)×log(3/4)=log(1/3) is not equivalent to X+3=log(3/4)/log(1/3)
but this does:
(X+3)×log(3/4)=log(1/3) X+3=log(1/3)/log(3/4)
and I prefer your way :)
No bases of 3/4 and no conversions from base 3/4 to base 10
👏
糊塗
No, desde el inicio se pudo aplicar logaritmos y de una manera más fácil, directa y sin tantos pasos, se hubiera llegado al resultado !!
This was the way I did it and I got the right answer x=0.8188… within two minutes.
Not 0.8168 as this idiot. And I call him an idiot because he is making calculations for nearly a1/4 hour that don't bring him any closer to the result, not because he pressed the wrong key at one instance.