The most fun and transcendent flying machine is the F-16. If I wanted to feel like I could actually fly and move however I want, the F-16 does that. Another youtuber who flied both the F-15 and F-16 loves the F-16 much more. The bubble canopy and relaxed position and the responsive fly-by-wire side stick makes you forget the the rest of the plane is there. Now if I had to fly into a warzone on a mission, I'd want the F-35, with all the support.
@@keirfarnum6811 true but a little misleading. It's due to the average size and height of a women is smaller than a man so blood doesn't have to be pumped as far under stress hence having an average higher g-load. If a man was the same height and the same body size, it would be the same.
The shape of the bottom body panels is among my favourite design on the whole jet. It reminds me of how the top of an F1 car looks like but upside down
When I learned that a stealth feature is having all of the angles at the same degree these aircraft became so much cooler! You can see everything from the large wings down to small panels that are angled in the same way to achieve certain capabilities. Great engineering is beautiful art!
Ever since Battle of the X-Planes with the then, X-32, and X-35, on PBS I was hooked, and have two magazines dedicated towards the F-35, Lightning II. Even though Parliament in my country, Canada, reneged on the JSF, I can still appreciate this beast from afar. I hope everyone also have a great holiday, this upcoming winter. Take care, and all the best.
Yeah I remember rooting for the 35. I mean I was young, and the X-32 was so hideous so even if it were better I would have hated it hah. Shit I'm old enough to where I remember rooting for the Raptor due to the name. I thought it looked better too back then, but now I prefer the YF-23. I'm actually sick of the Raptors looks, and how generic it is now.
Hands down the very best presentation of this remarkable warbird. Props to the entire production crew and a big salute to Jackieo for her service in the Viper and for this wonderful report.
I know the technology is crazy advanced but when you hear the WWII numbers they were popping out planes tanks and ships in like minutes and hours. Love seeing the f-35 getting some love it’s so badass wish we had more f-22s though
In WW2, the entire national economy was subordinate to the military. Commodities of daily life were rationed in order to make that possible. There's no call for that today, nor should there be.
I’ll admit, I was a vocal critic of the F-35 but as I see how it’s employed, even I gotta admit, I’m a fan. Imagine a pair of F-35’s backed by a couple dozen F-15EX’s with a few sticks of F-16’s running cover and a group of EA-18G Growlers paving the way. That’s a badass formation. Now do that X 10… Multiple times.
I know it sounds dumb but the Growlers will be unnecessary. The F-35C's AN/ASQ-239 Barracuda electronic warfare system is far superior in that regard too.
@@RocketPropelledGuyin some cases this is true, but if I remember correctly from what limited knowledge of the growler I have, the growler has a better top speed meaning that you can get out of places easier, which is important because you light yourself up like a Christmas tree when you start jamming people. So while the f-35s electronic warfare suite is very good in some situations, it can defeat its own stealth That speed difference is Mach 1.8 for the growler and Mach 1.6 for the f35. Those are the Wikipedia specifications so it's entirely possible that both aircraft could hit higher speeds under emergency situations, but there's no way that we are going to be told that without having a security clearance
survivability is better than any other aircraft a lot of people don't know this but it has a buoy that mimics the whatever missile or aircraft is locked onto the f-35 signature and then the tow behind Bowie mimics the signature of the f-35 at the exact moment the missile or aircraft locked on to it which means the missiles incoming have no reason to believe the tow behind is not the f-35 pretty cool technology. It also jams better than any other plane in the market by far.
@@Its-Just-Zip Here's the thing. The "top speed" of almost any fighter is going to be from what it is completely clean, no weapons and often even without things we consider essential for doing the work in the modern era like targeting pods. The F-35 has it all internal, it does not have the extra drag of these things and the "top speed" is with the weight of all those in there with a full internal weapons bay. Even going mach 1 is a very rare event in a combat sortie, and not a single coalition aircraft ever even went mach 1 in a combat mission throughout the entire Gulf War. Vietnam demonstrated extremely high top speed like that was just not the useful thing USAF SAC claimed it was going to be. Having excellent thrust though, is a different matter. The Hornet, both the Legacy, Super Hornet, and Growler all suffer from lackluster thrust. An F/A-18F pilot (who also was a Fighter Weapons School graduate) having switched to the F-35 likened flying the F-35C to flying a hornet with 4 engines. It's like the fantastic thrust and 2-circle authority of an F-16 (which the F-35 also outperforms in almost everything including a rate fight if the F-16 is carrying any weapons at all) with the very high AoA authority of the Hornet. It has a better range than both, carries more fuel than both internally, has a far better safety record, has the automatic ground collision avoidance that the hornet doesn't (Most of the F-16's in US inventory do now though) and can carry more weapons than either in a permissive air defense environment. But because EW is now so important I don't know what to tell you about whether or not jamming is as compromising as you say. I really doubt we will get honest information about that from anyone that actually knows, understandably. And all of that is without getting into much more complex stuff like Sensor Fusion and the very, very impressive MADL Data-Link, those are giant leaps in capability that change everything and the character limit of a TH-cam comment isn't enough to explain how.
I'm super excited for the 6th Gen, i was too young for the Raptor, and wasn't really into fighter jets when the F-35 started rolling out but It'll be perfect when the NGAD and F/A-XX roll out and I can't wait for the SR-72
This is a beautiful warning to the Allied world's enemy that do not mess with America and its allied friends. Awesome video and presentation. God Bless USA
Been out for a few years now, and it was cool to support the 33rd with the muns requirements thry had. Didn't miss the B models hovering over us though. Those boys made some low ass passes over our dump.
I live just down the road from Willow Run where the B-24 was built back in the day on an assembly line by Henry Ford . If I remember correctly one came off every 57 minutes.
You bet-but remember, we did have to keep it ‘unclassified’. If it doesn’t answer your questions, give me a shout and I’ll do what I can to hook you up with the answer or direct you to someone who can. Enjoy the show. Fight’sON!™️
Specifically, Marines are there to service their own weapons and gears - and to go ashore when the SHTF. Otherwise, they're still the Ship's Captain's security....
Both VMFA-314 and VMFA-311 operate the F-35C. Also, the F-35A is equipped with a tail hook as well to make arrested landings ashore if necessary but does not operate from a carrier.
The people who complained about the development cost failed to mention that it’s 3 jets under the F-35 name. The carrier ready, non harrier, jet is probably reinforced in many ways compared to the ‘A’ model. I cant think of a more varied jet. The F-18 has many classifications for fighter, bomber and recon but it’s not altering the frame for different clutches/motor adaptations/gear/landing capabilities. So, with the modular framework employed I’d suggest this design get it’s own generation rank. If we can build one jet to serve 3 designs I can’t think of a newer idea.
18 Months 4k Workers Maybe 165 k person hrs to build 1. Prestigious Platform top line Performer , Stealth, Interconnectivity , Jump jet Variant , Force Multiplier What a Fighter !.
The F35 is like a mini AWACs in terms of detecting targets but a full-size AWACs plane has more people which lets it act like a flying Air traffic control tower coordinating a whole formation much better than a single pilot could. Additionally the E-2 can loiter for way longer than any fighter jet providing faster communication than a ground tower and continuously coordinating the battle as F-35s go to refuel and rearm. The E-2C is also being actively replaced by the E-2D which has a new AESA radar which presumably exceeds the capabilities of the F-35s radar, or at least we guess it does all that info is classified. The D models can also have aerial refueling capability allowing it to stay in the air even longer. Of course the E-2 isn't stealthy so entering contested air space isn't safe but it has such a large range that it shouldn't need to.
@@T-Dawg123a so, if the 35s networking capabilities are "real time" with the E-2D, than the 35 can leverage information exclusive to the Hawkeye in it's narrow mission set; and that is saying something if there are several of them up there together working an opponent in a buttoned-up configuration. Then, the only other consideration is whether the super-carrier where the E-2 calls home can dodge submarines in perpetuity while the airwing works it's magic at a distance with in-flight refueling.
@@jamesbohlman4297 yeah submarines are a threat but carriers can have a attack submarine in their strike group as well as the other ships and the reserve airwing being capable of deploying ASW sensors and weapons additionally land base aircraft like the P-8 have long loiter times and specialize in anti sub warfare.
@@jamesbohlman4297eh idk about hopeless dinosaur (unlike their air force Russias subs actually can pose a threat) but they certainly outclassed by the LA class
I wish you could go flying! Either a two-seater F-35 or maybe a training version that has remote control backup, so a trained operator on the ground can take over in case of emergency.
They’ve got nothing to talk about. Russia tied with Combat Approved on the SU-57 and accidentally revealed a fatal flaw the SU-57 had (which is that it’s not stealth capable).
Yeah, but the F-35 is multi-role and has better communication with allies (with them all forming a ‘web’ of information to upload targets to all active F-35s and such, which the F-22 doesn’t have).
F-35 is newer and has more advanced electronics than the F-22. F-22 will dominate in a dogfight, but the F-35 is the more advanced aircraft, and the F-35 aims to win before dogfighting is necessary.
While filming for this episode, many pilots spoke about how raw speed isn't as important as it used to be, and that as the air battlefield evolves, Mach 1.6 is fast enough for many mission profiles.
Raw speed wasn’t even that important as far back as the Vietnam War. I read a report that indicated that no jet, not one, ever went supersonic on an operational sortie. To me, that sounds extreme, but even if there were exceptions, it goes to show that going Mach 2.5 doesn’t mean much in the real world of combat flying. Most jets on full afterburner will run out of gas in 10-15 minutes. Going fast burns gas faster.
Air combat scenario has evolved to BVR. No more vietnam war era close gunslinger fights. Going mach speed burns fuel fast & reduce effective combat range.
@@tadferd4340 Thats what the A and C are for, STOVL is a capability that the marines need for their doctrine and way of fighting, so they were willing to compromise
It only needs stealth using the smaller bays for SEAD missions and early strikes. Once air dominance is established, they can carry a lot more on external mounts when stealth isn't the primary mission.
"Each jet spends about 18 months in production." As of now, the US has an inventory of some hundreds of F35s. By way of comparison, in 1944 alone, the US produced nearly 100,000 aircraft. Assembly times then were often measured in hours, not months, with no assistance from robots or computers. We outside the military and its contractors sincerely hope and expect the F35 to be as superior as its premium price warrants.
To be fair in 1944 the entire economy was put towards the war effort, rn we put (comparatively) little to the military (which is fine, it can still very much do its job)
In 1944 all they had to do was build a simple prop plane with a gun on it. Nowadays it’s all tech very advanced tech. Also over 1000 f35s have been built which is insane.
Join Colorado's First Lady Fighter Pilot, Tracy LaTourette, for an up-close look at one of the most advanced military aircraft in the world.
It’s so cool that we have women fighter pilots now; some who are now retired. Apparently women actually have better G tolerance than men do.
We should make the whole jet fighter force female.
The f16 is a better all round fighter in most applications! 😊
The most fun and transcendent flying machine is the F-16. If I wanted to feel like I could actually fly and move however I want, the F-16 does that. Another youtuber who flied both the F-15 and F-16 loves the F-16 much more. The bubble canopy and relaxed position and the responsive fly-by-wire side stick makes you forget the the rest of the plane is there.
Now if I had to fly into a warzone on a mission, I'd want the F-35, with all the support.
@@keirfarnum6811 true but a little misleading. It's due to the average size and height of a women is smaller than a man so blood doesn't have to be pumped as far under stress hence having an average higher g-load. If a man was the same height and the same body size, it would be the same.
She's a natural host. Great episode.
It's amazing how organic the F-35s internal framework looks - hardly any straight lines. Honestly looks like they're assembling armored dragons...
The F-35's edges, reduced engine signature, internal carriage of weapons, fuel and sensors all contribute to its stealth capabilities
The shape of the bottom body panels is among my favourite design on the whole jet. It reminds me of how the top of an F1 car looks like but upside down
In a very real sense, modern fighters are faster and more powerful than the flying lizards medieval people imagined
When I learned that a stealth feature is having all of the angles at the same degree these aircraft became so much cooler! You can see everything from the large wings down to small panels that are angled in the same way to achieve certain capabilities. Great engineering is beautiful art!
@@markmeripa Reminds me of a tomboy with exposed abs
Ever since Battle of the X-Planes with the then, X-32, and X-35, on PBS I was hooked, and have two magazines dedicated towards the F-35, Lightning II.
Even though Parliament in my country, Canada, reneged on the JSF, I can still appreciate this beast from afar.
I hope everyone also have a great holiday, this upcoming winter.
Take care, and all the best.
Yeah I remember rooting for the 35. I mean I was young, and the X-32 was so hideous so even if it were better I would have hated it hah.
Shit I'm old enough to where I remember rooting for the Raptor due to the name. I thought it looked better too back then, but now I prefer the YF-23. I'm actually sick of the Raptors looks, and how generic it is now.
I thought that show was a fever dream. I'm glad someone else has watched it
Canada ordered 88 of them and will start taking deliveries in 2026
Trudeau gave LM the contract after a close tie with the Gripen
@@Enkarashaddamlmao the F35 ain’t ever tied with the gripes, it wins every time
Hands down the very best presentation of this remarkable warbird. Props to the entire production crew and a big salute to Jackieo for her service in the Viper and for this wonderful report.
I know the technology is crazy advanced but when you hear the WWII numbers they were popping out planes tanks and ships in like minutes and hours. Love seeing the f-35 getting some love it’s so badass wish we had more f-22s though
In WW2, the entire national economy was subordinate to the military. Commodities of daily life were rationed in order to make that possible. There's no call for that today, nor should there be.
Not comparable, but I agree. In wartime the amount of jets and weapons a country produces is key
This lady would make the best grandma ever, the stories she can tell, they would be epic. Hope she knows how to bake great pies and cookies too!
I’ll admit, I was a vocal critic of the F-35 but as I see how it’s employed, even I gotta admit, I’m a fan.
Imagine a pair of F-35’s backed by a couple dozen F-15EX’s with a few sticks of F-16’s running cover and a group of EA-18G Growlers paving the way. That’s a badass formation.
Now do that X 10… Multiple times.
I know it sounds dumb but the Growlers will be unnecessary. The F-35C's AN/ASQ-239 Barracuda electronic warfare system is far superior in that regard too.
@@RocketPropelledGuyin some cases this is true, but if I remember correctly from what limited knowledge of the growler I have, the growler has a better top speed meaning that you can get out of places easier, which is important because you light yourself up like a Christmas tree when you start jamming people. So while the f-35s electronic warfare suite is very good in some situations, it can defeat its own stealth
That speed difference is Mach 1.8 for the growler and Mach 1.6 for the f35. Those are the Wikipedia specifications so it's entirely possible that both aircraft could hit higher speeds under emergency situations, but there's no way that we are going to be told that without having a security clearance
survivability is better than any other aircraft a lot of people don't know this but it has a buoy that mimics the whatever missile or aircraft is locked onto the f-35 signature and then the tow behind Bowie mimics the signature of the f-35 at the exact moment the missile or aircraft locked on to it which means the missiles incoming have no reason to believe the tow behind is not the f-35 pretty cool technology. It also jams better than any other plane in the market by far.
@@Its-Just-Zip Here's the thing. The "top speed" of almost any fighter is going to be from what it is completely clean, no weapons and often even without things we consider essential for doing the work in the modern era like targeting pods. The F-35 has it all internal, it does not have the extra drag of these things and the "top speed" is with the weight of all those in there with a full internal weapons bay. Even going mach 1 is a very rare event in a combat sortie, and not a single coalition aircraft ever even went mach 1 in a combat mission throughout the entire Gulf War. Vietnam demonstrated extremely high top speed like that was just not the useful thing USAF SAC claimed it was going to be. Having excellent thrust though, is a different matter.
The Hornet, both the Legacy, Super Hornet, and Growler all suffer from lackluster thrust. An F/A-18F pilot (who also was a Fighter Weapons School graduate) having switched to the F-35 likened flying the F-35C to flying a hornet with 4 engines. It's like the fantastic thrust and 2-circle authority of an F-16 (which the F-35 also outperforms in almost everything including a rate fight if the F-16 is carrying any weapons at all) with the very high AoA authority of the Hornet. It has a better range than both, carries more fuel than both internally, has a far better safety record, has the automatic ground collision avoidance that the hornet doesn't (Most of the F-16's in US inventory do now though) and can carry more weapons than either in a permissive air defense environment.
But because EW is now so important I don't know what to tell you about whether or not jamming is as compromising as you say. I really doubt we will get honest information about that from anyone that actually knows, understandably. And all of that is without getting into much more complex stuff like Sensor Fusion and the very, very impressive MADL Data-Link, those are giant leaps in capability that change everything and the character limit of a TH-cam comment isn't enough to explain how.
@@Its-Just-Zip Just remember that Mach 1.6 top speed is with a full load of weapons.
Did I just find my new favorite channel!? Shockingly surprised that the YT algorithm Gods got it right!
The Wright Brothers would be completely amazed at the great advances made in aviation since their humble flight at Kitty Hawk.
Excellent hosting and production. I visited your museum summer of 2023
Saw it today on PBS
People take the sound barrier for granted these days. It’s literally amazing that out aircraft can do this like it’s Monday morning.
That was presented very nicely. Thanks Tracy. Well done. 🎉
Great review of the F-35 by an EXPERIENCED pilot‼Too bad there's no 2-seater for her great commentary from the air.👍🏽👏🏽👏🏽👏🏽👏🏽👏🏽
I'm super excited for the 6th Gen, i was too young for the Raptor, and wasn't really into fighter jets when the F-35 started rolling out but It'll be perfect when the NGAD and F/A-XX roll out and I can't wait for the SR-72
Refreshing to have a new series!
“Silk Ride.” Never heard that expression before.. 🤔👍
Love her emotions
This is a beautiful warning to the Allied world's enemy that do not mess with America and its allied friends. Awesome video and presentation. God Bless USA
Oo rah 🇺🇸
Siren!?! Nice call sign!!!!
Been out for a few years now, and it was cool to support the 33rd with the muns requirements thry had. Didn't miss the B models hovering over us though. Those boys made some low ass passes over our dump.
I live just down the road from Willow Run where the B-24 was built back in the day on an assembly line by Henry Ford . If I remember correctly one came off every 57 minutes.
Women out in front is so awesome, love this video.
F-35 program is what the TFX program should have been back in 1960s
Wow this is amazing
Seeing how essential that helmet is, what happens if there is a malfunction? Can they still operate the jet without it?
"Cool!," merci.
jabardast. ekdum jhakas!
I hope this covers more than the basic Information everyone knows. I'm expecting a lot.
You bet-but remember, we did have to keep it ‘unclassified’. If it doesn’t answer your questions, give me a shout and I’ll do what I can to hook you up with the answer or direct you to someone who can. Enjoy the show.
Fight’sON!™️
@@tracylatourrette6856you are amazing as a host
@@Jon-cw8bb2nd that. Nice work.
@@tracylatourrette6856It was a massive let down that Tracy didn't get to fly the F35 during the film. Has it happened since filming?
Was is in the Navy for 8 years including a Gator Navy tour. I still haven’t figured out why Marines are on Carriers.
Specifically, Marines are there to service their own weapons and gears - and to go ashore when the SHTF. Otherwise, they're still the Ship's Captain's security....
I still can't get over Raytheon being called RTX (on) now.
6:24 Texas production facility. 🏭🧑🏭✈
16:40 Flight equipment. 🤿
So awesome! Thanks for sharing!
How cooool is that!!
Great video
Great job
18 months to complete one! WOW..
Both VMFA-314 and VMFA-311 operate the F-35C. Also, the F-35A is equipped with a tail hook as well to make arrested landings ashore if necessary but does not operate from a carrier.
A lot of planes do, f15 and f16 have em as well (along with others I just forgot)
Great job, well done 👍👍
It's amazing how organic the F-35s internal framework looks - hardly any straight lines. Honestly looks like they're assembling armored dragons...
Wow faster than the speed of sound 😮
The people who complained about the development cost failed to mention that it’s 3 jets under the F-35 name. The carrier ready, non harrier, jet is probably reinforced in many ways compared to the ‘A’ model. I cant think of a more varied jet. The F-18 has many classifications for fighter, bomber and recon but it’s not altering the frame for different clutches/motor adaptations/gear/landing capabilities. So, with the modular framework employed I’d suggest this design get it’s own generation rank. If we can build one jet to serve 3 designs I can’t think of a newer idea.
Amazing plane with amazing girl's flying it.... Inspiring
Fat Amy is an interesting aircraft
Wow, amazing🤣🤩
How ironic since I watched battle of the x-planes like over 15 years ago on PBS
God bless america!
Can't wait too see what a 6gen jet will look like. The b 21 raider just looks like something out of a sci-fi movie butt that's the new bomber...
18 Months 4k Workers Maybe 165 k person hrs to build 1. Prestigious Platform top line Performer , Stealth, Interconnectivity , Jump jet Variant , Force Multiplier What a Fighter !.
The 35 operates outside the capability of the E-2 Hawkeye?
The F35 is like a mini AWACs in terms of detecting targets but a full-size AWACs plane has more people which lets it act like a flying Air traffic control tower coordinating a whole formation much better than a single pilot could. Additionally the E-2 can loiter for way longer than any fighter jet providing faster communication than a ground tower and continuously coordinating the battle as F-35s go to refuel and rearm. The E-2C is also being actively replaced by the E-2D which has a new AESA radar which presumably exceeds the capabilities of the F-35s radar, or at least we guess it does all that info is classified. The D models can also have aerial refueling capability allowing it to stay in the air even longer. Of course the E-2 isn't stealthy so entering contested air space isn't safe but it has such a large range that it shouldn't need to.
@@T-Dawg123a so, if the 35s networking capabilities are "real time" with the E-2D, than the 35 can leverage information exclusive to the Hawkeye in it's narrow mission set; and that is saying something if there are several of them up there together working an opponent in a buttoned-up configuration. Then, the only other consideration is whether the super-carrier where the E-2 calls home can dodge submarines in perpetuity while the airwing works it's magic at a distance with in-flight refueling.
@@jamesbohlman4297 yeah submarines are a threat but carriers can have a attack submarine in their strike group as well as the other ships and the reserve airwing being capable of deploying ASW sensors and weapons additionally land base aircraft like the P-8 have long loiter times and specialize in anti sub warfare.
@@T-Dawg123a my understanding is that the Kilo class is a hopeless dinosaur in the presence of a Los Angeles class.
@@jamesbohlman4297eh idk about hopeless dinosaur (unlike their air force Russias subs actually can pose a threat) but they certainly outclassed by the LA class
Had an f-35 pilot say it’s like flying a cheat code.
So impressive and proud
แก้วอุดอน❤
How come i just watched one of these.. about the f 111.. that went mach 2.1.
I wish you could go flying! Either a two-seater F-35 or maybe a training version that has remote control backup, so a trained operator on the ground can take over in case of emergency.
I've heard that pilots train on VR mostly so its possible to try the F-35
It's a warrior angel,,,,, King David 45
Am I the only one to notice Paul Moga from Great Planes?!
@7:35 you can practically hear a pin drop.... Hammering and general low roar in background throughout interview.... 😂😂😂😂
It is incredibly quiet inside for an assembly line!
Think about the air dominance capabilities of the US with what they overwhelmingly bring to the fight.
For you Brad...Could not share.
Is this plane meant for combat or video game playing?
Why not both lol, got a big ass screen in it
Is it EMP proof ?
Nothing is EMP proof. It is EMP resistant like any other military hardware with shielding though
People who say this have no fucking clue how EMP or computers work.
Stop playing call of duty please
I want to lnow the story behind his callsign "Snooki."
Flowery language aside there is absolutely no content in this video worth differentiating from other pieces on the F-35
Because the rest is secret (shhhhhhhhhh😄🤫)
So....is the f35 the most advanced fighter? I may have missed hearing it ! 😂
The ladies are very impressive.
Looks like a trophy truck without the body work
I wish China and Russia would put out videos like this
They’ve got nothing to talk about. Russia tied with Combat Approved on the SU-57 and accidentally revealed a fatal flaw the SU-57 had (which is that it’s not stealth capable).
A corporate ad about "the most advanced" F-35 funded by Raytheon? But of course.
I know you guys are turbo american but you REALLY cant call the F35 the only 5th gen in production (J-20 exists)
Psyop paper planes don’t count
Not at all on the same level, LOL.....
I want to see behind the "Tic Tac"
"The most advanced* ..." * ... That can be publicly acknowledge at this time.
Aces High. Usually see F15s but roaring above. Awesomeness above. Keep on deterring.
Show us the ufos 🛸
Awesome bird; now, give it a couple of years and we'll see the Chinese version of it in 'their sky'!
Wonder if it will be made of plastic again?
At least you have freedom of movement.
Already 17 years old? Makes you wonder what they are really flying now.
At approx 11min, why did they salute a civilian test pilot whos emoloyed by Lockheed martin?
Kepentingan nasional. Daerah kab Indramayu. Perjalanan mobil dan motor. Aman dan tentram.
Never use "utilized" when you can use "use"
I have utilized “use” often; but my usage varies. 😆
Unless you've already used "use" in the same or in the prior sentence.
F-22 has entered the chat….
Yeah, but the F-35 is multi-role and has better communication with allies (with them all forming a ‘web’ of information to upload targets to all active F-35s and such, which the F-22 doesn’t have).
Funny how the F-35 holds the title of most advanced, but we don't sell anyone our F-22's. 😉
F 35 Lockheed Martin. USA. Pabrik pesawat jet tempur. Kesatuan negara RI.
Isnt the F22 the "most advanced of them all". Confusing.
F-35 is newer and has more advanced electronics than the F-22. F-22 will dominate in a dogfight, but the F-35 is the more advanced aircraft, and the F-35 aims to win before dogfighting is necessary.
ready everyday for awar and battle the mairne navy destryo to phil butuancity obrero ang target lea balew inday again low mkers
Mach 1.6 is fast for sure, But not as fast as F-22 or older F-15 which do Mach 2.5.
While filming for this episode, many pilots spoke about how raw speed isn't as important as it used to be, and that as the air battlefield evolves, Mach 1.6 is fast enough for many mission profiles.
Can't wait to see our Canadian Air force personnel finally get this beautiful 5th generation fighter to showcase their talents!
Raw speed wasn’t even that important as far back as the Vietnam War. I read a report that indicated that no jet, not one, ever went supersonic on an operational sortie. To me, that sounds extreme, but even if there were exceptions, it goes to show that going Mach 2.5 doesn’t mean much in the real world of combat flying.
Most jets on full afterburner will run out of gas in 10-15 minutes. Going fast burns gas faster.
Air combat scenario has evolved to BVR. No more vietnam war era close gunslinger fights. Going mach speed burns fuel fast & reduce effective combat range.
@@ronjon7942 The F-4E Phantom II that managed to do the world's only supersonic gun kill: "Am I a joke to you?"
It seems the pilots who fly this love it, but the real experts. The people in the comments tell me this is the worst plane ever.
Exactly, people who still think it’s 1943 keep saying ‘it can’t dogfight!!’ and acting like dogfighting didn’t die by midway through Vietnam.
All of my knowledge about the F-35 is from a pc game from 1997 called JSF.
It is reported that the F35 jet turbine will stall during high G manuever (9G).
True or False?
WOOZLE DETECTED
Unknown, likely false. But why would an F-35 need to pull a high-G? It’s practically made for BVR.
RIP to all the Black Knights lost while fighting the alien invasion in July 1996.
“Kick the fires and light the tires!” 😂
I don't understand why the variants of the F-35 don't have enough internal space to carry more ordinance. 4's not enough.
They expanding it to 6, though yea it’s gonna carry less ordinance, that’s the price you pay for being undetected
@@Apple-om5mrIt's why I hate the F35-B. Not having to implement a STVOL system would free up more volume for weapon bays.
@@tadferd4340 Thats what the A and C are for, STOVL is a capability that the marines need for their doctrine and way of fighting, so they were willing to compromise
Loyal Wingman drones for additional ordnance carrying. Also other non-stealth planes hanging back to act as bomb trucks.
It only needs stealth using the smaller bays for SEAD missions and early strikes. Once air dominance is established, they can carry a lot more on external mounts when stealth isn't the primary mission.
☺️
Can't see it, but can definitely hear it 🤣
From >100 miles away? You must have superhuman hearing. Air to air engagements aren’t dogfights anymore.
"Each jet spends about 18 months in production." As of now, the US has an inventory of some hundreds of F35s. By way of comparison, in 1944 alone, the US produced nearly 100,000 aircraft. Assembly times then were often measured in hours, not months, with no assistance from robots or computers. We outside the military and its contractors sincerely hope and expect the F35 to be as superior as its premium price warrants.
To be fair in 1944 the entire economy was put towards the war effort, rn we put (comparatively) little to the military (which is fine, it can still very much do its job)
In 1944 all they had to do was build a simple prop plane with a gun on it. Nowadays it’s all tech very advanced tech. Also over 1000 f35s have been built which is insane.
Ironically it can't survive being hit by lightning.
Siren may sound like a cool name, but I guarantee there is an embarrassing meaning behind it.
Call sign siren. It’s funny because a siren is a demon woman soul eater of men.
F35, jack of all trades, master of none.
Master of getting shit done and living to tell the tale
Things you say when you don’t know what you’re talking about
"This jet fighter is a disaster, but Congress keeps buying it."
PTP.. CTTO.... th-cam.com/video/ba63OVl1MHw/w-d-xo.html
@@jb76489 "Is The F-35 Worth $115 Million?"
PTP... CTTO... th-cam.com/video/zDujFhvgUzI/w-d-xo.html
But often times better than master of one
There’s the full quote for you.
Police squad
i was gonna say something, but i'm tired of looking over my back. Ooh! A paradox!
VFA