just watch the scorpion ,observe its anatomy and system and try to find the error in its biological structure. and if you found no error then start to think and who created that species ?
@@mazharabbasbukhari7390 I'm not sure what you mean. Scorpions, like any other organisms, are subject to genetic disorders, among other things, so yeah, every living being has "errors". For example, I have inherited bad eyesight. If nor for modern medicine, I would be legally blind. I'd call that an error. Not sure what that proves though, since having or not having "errors" has nothing to do with something being created or uncreated.
@@WhiteScorpio2 how narrow minded and arrogant does a human have to be to only believe in something they can see, hear, smell, touch or taste? if i were to hold a pen in my hand and said this came literally out of thin air, not even a brainless animal would believe that and your telling me this perfectly built universe with everything in it intact suddenly appeared? if you were to see a pencil you would say this was definetly designed however a human being so brilliantly built with all its complimentary organs and systems does not have a designer? do you know how many things humans believe in without seeing/feeling/touching etc and they *scientifically exist* such as gravity amongst other things. And who told you God has to appear visible to the eye to debunk atheism? atheism itself is built on "what ever is sensed with the 5 senses exists" that entire idea itself is the most faulty idea arrogant human beings have hallucinated because of their lack of knowledge and excess of arrogance . Also do you even know how genetic disorders happen for you to even think how ur thinking? Everything around is a notion and a pointer to the existence of a designer, originator and omniscient.
@@AnudeepRathod You responded to the OP: "There is only one way to "debunk" atheism - demonstrate God. I'll be waiting." You replied with: "we can never" Yet in a different thread in here you also say: "atheism is a belief, Islam is a belief, Religion is a belief. You can debunk beliefs" essentially asserting that you can debunk atheism. You truly are conflicted.
Sounds as if you're not quite grasping the whole atheism thing. You cannot debunk- being a SKEPTIC or "CRITICAL THINKER". (atheist). You cannot debunk- "wanting more proof and evidence that a Creator exists." (For ANY of the numerous god-based religions). There are atheists that would gladly be a believer TODAY if the assertion of a God could be UNDENIABLY PROVEN.
The problem is with undeniable proof of God comes understanding and comprehending God, God is too great to be understood or comprehended. If you want some occurrence or miracle then that already had happened, and the problem with this also is that what is a miracle. A person living, let's say, 400 years ago would see a flying plane as some sort of miracle or sorcery; but after centuries we have a flying plane due to the advancement of technology. When the Sayed says "debunking athiesm" its about debunking the popular notion and arguments of atheism.
@17:26 I think you are uncharitable in your interpretation of Bertrand Russel's words "What science can not tell us, man kind can not know." He is not saying "What science does not tell us, man kind can not know." and as such seems to be saying that science will eventually lead to all knowable truths, not that science is the only way to any or all of those truths. Though this is equally my own interpretation and the best way to understand what he meant would be to ask him which sadly can not be done. @18:47 "Do you have scientific evidence, to present, that science is the only way to learning the truth?" I do not think anyone has scientific evidence that science is the only way to the truth. What people do have evidence for is that science is the best currently known way to the truth. This is depending on what you mean by truth, but if you mean that which is in accordance with fact or reality, then it works pretty well. As for a simple example of evidence that science is the best known way to the truth as described above so far, almost everything you interact with in your daily life and the ways you interact were a result of studying the world and how it works. Every car is proof that we understood the world enough to reconfigure bits of it to do what we wanted it to, as is every book and all your clothes and your job and even the way we farm or farming itself. Humans as a race would not be able to change the world in such a deliberate way if they did not understand enough to make what changes they choose. Understanding that has mostly come from science. Science as a methodology has worked quite well so far. It is not the only one we've used or the only one that's worked, but it has had the best 'predictive power' so far. @21:46 about the inherent limitations of science re childrens questions. I wont say that science doesn't have limitations. It takes a long time to understand stuff, its often unpleasant or difficult, science only lets you gather knowledge, not use or utilize it, and science also only deals with what exists that we can observe, directly or indirectly and can experiment with. But the questions of why am I here, where did I come from and what's the purpose of life? Science has answers for all of these. Not fulfilling, or meaningful answers and should you keep asking down the rabbit hole it will eventually terminate in a "I don't know." but it does have answers. Specifically the answers are, "Why am I here?" You were moved here, if you are asking why you exist, due to your parents doing an act that brings forth life. "Where did I come from?" your last location, if you mean where were you before birth, as far as we know you weren't anywhere as you didn't exist yet. "What's the purpose of life?" Overall life appears no unifying purpose, if you mean what is your purpose, ask your parents why they wanted you and what they wanted you to do or ask your culture or ask other people or ask yourself what you want to do, all are equally valid. If you are asking as for an 'ultimate purpose', you would have to clarify what you meant by ultimate first. Though if you meant final, then your final purpose hasn't been figured out or decided yet. This appears to mostly be disagreeing with scientism rather then debunking atheism. Its interesting and I'd like to watch the rest of the series as you put them out, though I doubt I'd put such a long comment them, this was very spur of the moment.
Scientism is basically aithiesm because you are just denying a creator to try and find logic to how the world staryed whixh doesnt sork unless theres a creator
God exists and aithiest is bull may allah guide us all inshallah may allah guide you inshallah the sayed is intelectuall and aithiesm is just rejecturatory so this comment is in valide and doesnt provr anything allah exists and allah is the all seeing the all knowing and he is always in our hearts
Atheism is simply a lack of belief in a god, not a rejection. For example, if my religion believes in a planet that contains life 25,000 light years away that cannot be detected by modern telescopes, do you have to go out of your way to reject it? You might ask for proof but I say you only need faith, does that absolve me of responsibility of proving of this planet's existence? The issue of atheism vs agnosticism is more of semantics really. If you approach a self proclaiming atheist and tell them they are more likely an agnostic since no one really knows the existence of God they would probably respond with 'yeah okay I guess I'm agnostic'.
Atheism is a rejection. I do not believe there is a god because all claims that there is a god are not convincing. Therefore, I reject the claim that there is a god. How do you continue not believing in a god when you are inundated with claims to the contrary unless you reject those claims?
Re: "The issue of atheism vs agnosticism is more of semantics really." It is more than semantics. agnosticism is a subset of atheism. One might be a gnostic atheist, or an agnostic atheist. One can alternatively be an agnostic theist. "Yeah I believe there is a god, but I don't have knowledge, as none has been demonstrated yet, so currently unknowable, and maybe for ever" Saying that one is agnostic, needs clarification. One needs to clarify what one is agnostic about.
"Who is more humble? The scientist who looks at the universe with an open mind and accepts whatever the universe has to teach us, or somebody who says everything in this book must be considered the literal truth and never mind the fallibility of all the human beings involved?” Carl Sagan.
I'm a religious person And a scientist is more logical and smarter one Religious people might be peaceful but not smarter than astrophysicists And the reason why none of these physicists get into debates is because they think it's a waste of time As they are more knowledgeable atheism is a belief Islam is a belief Religion is a belief You can debunk beliefs
Who told you a religious person/ a muslim for example doesnt look at science nor the beliefs of others? We are open to discussion whether based on belief, scientific facts or whatever there is to be discussed. And you speak about being humble when there is absolutely nothing to be humble about in athiesm. Is there anything humble around defying logic? Is there anything humble about denying in this world that is made of matter and matter is built from atom and even the atom has a smaller form so delicate and so carefully designed to not have a designer? If you were to look at a car you would have the mental notion of it having a designer, a reason behind why its built and what its built from yet you deny that this compounded universe is not designed and built by a creator? Is that humble to you? And based on what? Cant see God therefore he doesnt exist! Give me a break its 2021 and we still need our 5 senses to claim something exists when this was never ever the case?
@@philipbridler may Allah guide you to the right path kid. One day you will be a practicing muslim and will revert your whole family to Islam *InshAllah*
Mashallah jazza Kal allah wa khairan, amazing speech May Allah Almighty bless you and your family with His mercy and reward you all in the day of hereafter. Mammon!
The creator cant affect the world He created? How weird and illogical of a saying is that. And everything you see is external knowledge about this world but we look with our eyes snd dont use ours brains
It’s far more arrogant to claim something you cannot demonstrate than it is to say you don’t know or don’t believe because of a lack of evidence. Demonstrate your god or any god. We do not reject we do nt see the evidence as being convincing.
What more evidence do you need? I don't understand much of philosophy or anything very analytical. However with my limited knowledge when I look at myself how with sophistication and detail I have been created. Leave all the other body parts if we only look in the structure of an eye how it catches the images and scans it and how it is placed in the face with the eye sockets protecting it. If all human beings on earth come together can not create a single cell from scratch then there must be a supreme power who can create things so beautifully and in so much variety. How a big bang can create the world so organized?
@@k.a1388 irrelevant. We know that living things arise from natural causes. What we don’t know and can’t seem to investigate or have any evidence for, is that some being created nature. We can look at dna and see how all living things are related. It’s just a fact. So, until you show evidence, good evidence for your god, I’m not convinced. What seems more likely to you? That a creator being we can’t sense in any way created us, or that nature and life gradually became more complex over time? We know that life did begin very simply and then became more complex - that is just a fact, even if we had no fossils and transitional creatures that show this happening, which we do. We could use strictly dna and that shows how all living things are related. This leaves you with not only having to come up with something that proves this evidence wrong but with having to explain an all powerful being, where it is, how it does what it does and how it was created.
For my belief I don't need evidence with stamp on it from any authority. I can see his existence with the eyes of my heart in every living and non living things. When I clearly see signs of a greater existence than me, then I accept that mighty creater as my God. I don't need to complicate myself and ignore all the universe just sticking on one point. Anyways best of luck for your journey. May one day you find the evidence with the required authentication.
@@k.a1388 More evidence? I've not seen any evidence. Looking at yourself and thinking you've been created is looking at it backwards. Have you heard of the poem about the sentient puddle by douglas adams? The puddle looks at himself and thinks he's so perfect he must have been designed for the hole he is sitting in. You are "the puddle." the laws of this universe is "the hole." To suggest this universe is organised, you would need another universe to compare this to. How would you know what a disorganised universe looks like? For all we know, this could be one. As for the eye - Richard Dawkins has a very good explanatory video which explains how the eye has evolved over time.
@@goodday512 then best of luck for the discovery of the other universes. You might need few more lives to complete your investigation. Why would I need anyone's hypothesis or theories to believe on how eyes have evolved over the period? Why anyone should believe on any theory a scientists presents and not an any other person'? What is the proof that Richard Dawkins is right? If it is a rule that for everything proof is needed then for you to proof yourself right you also need to show evidence that this world came into existence as result of a big bang. Where is your proof then?
At the end of the talk, the background nuha is sufficient and beautiful. It would be better if shaykh continues talking/rewatching dua/etc. with his normal voice. Reciting with روضه voice with the nowha in the background is distracting.
Allah (SWT) is eternal, and so not bound by the constraints of time. Allah (SWT) decided to create the universe and because of His unlimited power and authority, He commanded things to come into being. Allah (SWT) then made all living creatures, the angels, the planets, and the rain to allow vegetation to grow.
why is not possible to debunk atheism? you guys dont have 1 solid answer or even half a solid answer that certainly denies the existence of God, The oldest athiests in history and most notable ones never even denied the Existence of the creator they just had trouble grasping how the world came out to be.
@@alialishammari854 atheism is not being convinced of the claim a god exists. So there’s nothing to debunk. I don’t believe your claim about god-that’s it.
@@warrencolegrove1 that conviction/uncertainty is based off of what nothingness? Ofc its based off of thoughts/assumptions/hallucinations and what not. Didnt science teach you that you can argue those and debunk them? My God what an age we live in
Your god of the gaps rebuttal is weak. Science never lies. It can be misunderstood but it never conceals the truth. Yes we have evidence that god never did a thing for humanity like science has. Humanity has advanced bcuz of science and not bcuz of god.
God has never did a thing for humanity? The amount of arrogance in and ignorance in that sentence is unreal, science itself disagrees with you, logic disagrees with you and so does everything else. What has God given us? Everything good is thanks to Allah, the same brain, fingers and whatever you used to type that message is blessings from God. Stop trying to build a connection between your senses and what exists and not it doesnt work that way, science doesnt work thay way too. If i were to hold a pen and say thay this coincedentally came out of no where you'd never agree with that in a million years however you agree that this entire vast and vast is an understatement universe and what is in it randomly appeared with all its bits and details? How faulty,irrational, illogical, contradictory with whats real and the human thought process is that Tony? Why do you think you have to see something with youre own eyes for it to be visible?
@ali alsetri science will comprehend all these questions and get better soon Kiddo don't think like your religion who dosen't get better every day Science does we're suffering to create new things Hopefully we'll see atheists get some justice due to how violent they're treated
There is only one way to "debunk" atheism - demonstrate God. I'll be waiting.
we can never
just watch the scorpion ,observe its anatomy and system and try to find the error in its biological structure.
and if you found no error then start to think
and who created that species ?
@@mazharabbasbukhari7390 I'm not sure what you mean. Scorpions, like any other organisms, are subject to genetic disorders, among other things, so yeah, every living being has "errors". For example, I have inherited bad eyesight. If nor for modern medicine, I would be legally blind. I'd call that an error. Not sure what that proves though, since having or not having "errors" has nothing to do with something being created or uncreated.
@@WhiteScorpio2 how narrow minded and arrogant does a human have to be to only believe in something they can see, hear, smell, touch or taste? if i were to hold a pen in my hand and said this came literally out of thin air, not even a brainless animal would believe that and your telling me this perfectly built universe with everything in it intact suddenly appeared? if you were to see a pencil you would say this was definetly designed however a human being so brilliantly built with all its complimentary organs and systems does not have a designer? do you know how many things humans believe in without seeing/feeling/touching etc and they *scientifically exist* such as gravity amongst other things. And who told you God has to appear visible to the eye to debunk atheism? atheism itself is built on "what ever is sensed with the 5 senses exists" that entire idea itself is the most faulty idea arrogant human beings have hallucinated because of their lack of knowledge and excess of arrogance . Also do you even know how genetic disorders happen for you to even think how ur thinking? Everything around is a notion and a pointer to the existence of a designer, originator and omniscient.
@@AnudeepRathod You responded to the OP: "There is only one way to "debunk" atheism - demonstrate God. I'll be waiting." You replied with: "we can never"
Yet in a different thread in here you also say: "atheism is a belief, Islam is a belief, Religion is a belief. You can debunk beliefs" essentially asserting that you can debunk atheism.
You truly are conflicted.
May allah bless this voice , well done sayyedna .
Love you brother, keep up the absolutely amazing work!
يا الله! يا رسول الله! يا علي!
may Allah hasten the reappearance of Imam Mahdi ajtf
THANK YOU for this sayedna
Sounds as if you're not quite grasping the whole atheism thing.
You cannot debunk- being a SKEPTIC or "CRITICAL THINKER".
(atheist).
You cannot debunk- "wanting more proof and evidence that a Creator exists." (For ANY of the numerous god-based religions).
There are atheists that would gladly be a believer TODAY if the assertion of a God could be UNDENIABLY PROVEN.
The problem is with undeniable proof of God comes understanding and comprehending God, God is too great to be understood or comprehended. If you want some occurrence or miracle then that already had happened, and the problem with this also is that what is a miracle. A person living, let's say, 400 years ago would see a flying plane as some sort of miracle or sorcery; but after centuries we have a flying plane due to the advancement of technology. When the Sayed says "debunking athiesm" its about debunking the popular notion and arguments of atheism.
@@rafidhi7820 how do you know?
@@tonym9439 what do you mean?
@@rafidhi7820 how do you know god is so great? And incomprehensible?
@@rafidhi7820 so far, Sayed has done a piss poor job of debunking atheism.
Alhamdulillah, exactly what I need! Jazakallah khair!
@17:26 I think you are uncharitable in your interpretation of Bertrand Russel's words "What science can not tell us, man kind can not know." He is not saying "What science does not tell us, man kind can not know." and as such seems to be saying that science will eventually lead to all knowable truths, not that science is the only way to any or all of those truths.
Though this is equally my own interpretation and the best way to understand what he meant would be to ask him which sadly can not be done.
@18:47 "Do you have scientific evidence, to present, that science is the only way to learning the truth?"
I do not think anyone has scientific evidence that science is the only way to the truth. What people do have evidence for is that science is the best currently known way to the truth.
This is depending on what you mean by truth, but if you mean that which is in accordance with fact or reality, then it works pretty well.
As for a simple example of evidence that science is the best known way to the truth as described above so far, almost everything you interact with in your daily life and the ways you interact were a result of studying the world and how it works. Every car is proof that we understood the world enough to reconfigure bits of it to do what we wanted it to, as is every book and all your clothes and your job and even the way we farm or farming itself. Humans as a race would not be able to change the world in such a deliberate way if they did not understand enough to make what changes they choose. Understanding that has mostly come from science.
Science as a methodology has worked quite well so far. It is not the only one we've used or the only one that's worked, but it has had the best 'predictive power' so far.
@21:46 about the inherent limitations of science re childrens questions.
I wont say that science doesn't have limitations. It takes a long time to understand stuff, its often unpleasant or difficult, science only lets you gather knowledge, not use or utilize it, and science also only deals with what exists that we can observe, directly or indirectly and can experiment with.
But the questions of why am I here, where did I come from and what's the purpose of life? Science has answers for all of these. Not fulfilling, or meaningful answers and should you keep asking down the rabbit hole it will eventually terminate in a "I don't know." but it does have answers.
Specifically the answers are, "Why am I here?" You were moved here, if you are asking why you exist, due to your parents doing an act that brings forth life.
"Where did I come from?" your last location, if you mean where were you before birth, as far as we know you weren't anywhere as you didn't exist yet.
"What's the purpose of life?" Overall life appears no unifying purpose, if you mean what is your purpose, ask your parents why they wanted you and what they wanted you to do or ask your culture or ask other people or ask yourself what you want to do, all are equally valid.
If you are asking as for an 'ultimate purpose', you would have to clarify what you meant by ultimate first. Though if you meant final, then your final purpose hasn't been figured out or decided yet.
This appears to mostly be disagreeing with scientism rather then debunking atheism. Its interesting and I'd like to watch the rest of the series as you put them out, though I doubt I'd put such a long comment them, this was very spur of the moment.
@Peter Yingling He said birchwood so I didnt want to confuse things. Though maybe I heard him wrong.
Scientism is basically aithiesm because you are just denying a creator to try and find logic to how the world staryed whixh doesnt sork unless theres a creator
God exists and aithiest is bull may allah guide us all inshallah may allah guide you inshallah the sayed is intelectuall and aithiesm is just rejecturatory so this comment is in valide and doesnt provr anything allah exists and allah is the all seeing the all knowing and he is always in our hearts
Atheism is simply a lack of belief in a god, not a rejection.
For example, if my religion believes in a planet that contains life 25,000 light years away that cannot be detected by modern telescopes, do you have to go out of your way to reject it? You might ask for proof but I say you only need faith, does that absolve me of responsibility of proving of this planet's existence?
The issue of atheism vs agnosticism is more of semantics really. If you approach a self proclaiming atheist and tell them they are more likely an agnostic since no one really knows the existence of God they would probably respond with 'yeah okay I guess I'm agnostic'.
Atheism is a rejection. I do not believe there is a god because all claims that there is a god are not convincing. Therefore, I reject the claim that there is a god. How do you continue not believing in a god when you are inundated with claims to the contrary unless you reject those claims?
Re: "The issue of atheism vs agnosticism is more of semantics really." It is more than semantics. agnosticism is a subset of atheism. One might be a gnostic atheist, or an agnostic atheist. One can alternatively be an agnostic theist. "Yeah I believe there is a god, but I don't have knowledge, as none has been demonstrated yet, so currently unknowable, and maybe for ever"
Saying that one is agnostic, needs clarification. One needs to clarify what one is agnostic about.
"Who is more humble? The scientist who looks at the universe with an open mind and accepts whatever the universe has to teach us, or somebody who says everything in this book must be considered the literal truth and never mind the fallibility of all the human beings involved?” Carl Sagan.
I'm a religious person
And a scientist is more logical and smarter one
Religious people might be peaceful but not smarter than astrophysicists
And the reason why none of these physicists get into debates is because they think it's a waste of time
As they are more knowledgeable
atheism is a belief
Islam is a belief
Religion is a belief
You can debunk beliefs
@@AnudeepRathod don’t disagree with most of that, apart from atheism being a belief - Atheism is the lack of belief.
@@goodday512
but you still believe?
@@AnudeepRathod in a god? No.
Who told you a religious person/ a muslim for example doesnt look at science nor the beliefs of others? We are open to discussion whether based on belief, scientific facts or whatever there is to be discussed. And you speak about being humble when there is absolutely nothing to be humble about in athiesm. Is there anything humble around defying logic? Is there anything humble about denying in this world that is made of matter and matter is built from atom and even the atom has a smaller form so delicate and so carefully designed to not have a designer? If you were to look at a car you would have the mental notion of it having a designer, a reason behind why its built and what its built from yet you deny that this compounded universe is not designed and built by a creator? Is that humble to you? And based on what? Cant see God therefore he doesnt exist! Give me a break its 2021 and we still need our 5 senses to claim something exists when this was never ever the case?
Ahsant Sayed!
It was perfect. May Allah bless you.
Allah isn't a thing son. Grow up.
@@philipbridler may Allah guide you to the right path kid.
One day you will be a practicing muslim and will revert your whole family to Islam
*InshAllah*
Mashallah jazza Kal allah wa khairan, amazing speech May Allah Almighty bless you and your family with His mercy and reward you all in the day of hereafter. Mammon!
but your creator cannot affect the real world in anyways, or provide us any external knowledge about it, so why should people care?
The creator cant affect the world He created? How weird and illogical of a saying is that. And everything you see is external knowledge about this world but we look with our eyes snd dont use ours brains
Excellent
It’s far more arrogant to claim something you cannot demonstrate than it is to say you don’t know or don’t believe because of a lack of evidence.
Demonstrate your god or any god. We do not reject we do nt see the evidence as being convincing.
What more evidence do you need? I don't understand much of philosophy or anything very analytical. However with my limited knowledge when I look at myself how with sophistication and detail I have been created. Leave all the other body parts if we only look in the structure of an eye how it catches the images and scans it and how it is placed in the face with the eye sockets protecting it. If all human beings on earth come together can not create a single cell from scratch then there must be a supreme power who can create things so beautifully and in so much variety. How a big bang can create the world so organized?
@@k.a1388 irrelevant. We know that living things arise from natural causes. What we don’t know and can’t seem to investigate or have any evidence for, is that some being created nature. We can look at dna and see how all living things are related. It’s just a fact. So, until you show evidence, good evidence for your god, I’m not convinced. What seems more likely to you? That a creator being we can’t sense in any way created us, or that nature and life gradually became more complex over time? We know that life did begin very simply and then became more complex - that is just a fact, even if we had no fossils and transitional creatures that show this happening, which we do. We could use strictly dna and that shows how all living things are related. This leaves you with not only having to come up with something that proves this evidence wrong but with having to explain an all powerful being, where it is, how it does what it does and how it was created.
For my belief I don't need evidence with stamp on it from any authority. I can see his existence with the eyes of my heart in every living and non living things. When I clearly see signs of a greater existence than me, then I accept that mighty creater as my God. I don't need to complicate myself and ignore all the universe just sticking on one point. Anyways best of luck for your journey. May one day you find the evidence with the required authentication.
@@k.a1388 More evidence? I've not seen any evidence. Looking at yourself and thinking you've been created is looking at it backwards. Have you heard of the poem about the sentient puddle by douglas adams? The puddle looks at himself and thinks he's so perfect he must have been designed for the hole he is sitting in. You are "the puddle." the laws of this universe is "the hole." To suggest this universe is organised, you would need another universe to compare this to. How would you know what a disorganised universe looks like? For all we know, this could be one.
As for the eye - Richard Dawkins has a very good explanatory video which explains how the eye has evolved over time.
@@goodday512 then best of luck for the discovery of the other universes. You might need few more lives to complete your investigation.
Why would I need anyone's hypothesis or theories to believe on how eyes have evolved over the period? Why anyone should believe on any theory a scientists presents and not an any other person'? What is the proof that Richard Dawkins is right? If it is a rule that for everything proof is needed then for you to proof yourself right you also need to show evidence that this world came into existence as result of a big bang. Where is your proof then?
Beautiful can’t wait to listen
Masha'Allah sayyed
May Allah bless you Honrable Sayyid.
Very interesting speech. May Allah bless you.
الله يتقبل أعمالك سيد
Allahuma sali ala muhamd wa Ali muhamd wajjil farzahum shreef
I have a question the Sayed is clearly extremely intelligent so why does he appeal to modernity when talking about politics
Holy beard brother 😍👏 mashallah
جزاک الله خیرا.
🙏🏻🙏🏻👌
At the end of the talk, the background nuha is sufficient and beautiful. It would be better if shaykh continues talking/rewatching dua/etc. with his normal voice. Reciting with روضه voice with the nowha in the background is distracting.
What is the name of the nuha?
Make Short Clip of This Video💯🔥
You and Dr. Kent Hovind are on the same page.... Alua Akbar??
That's _Mr._ Kent Hovind. He ain't a real doctor, his PhDs are fake.
@@TheDapperSwindler does not matter, he is about as right as this guy..
@@kristofftaylovoski60 On that we agree.
Reason to be on TH-cam..
Allah (SWT) is eternal, and so not bound by the constraints of time. Allah (SWT) decided to create the universe and because of His unlimited power and authority, He commanded things to come into being. Allah (SWT) then made all living creatures, the angels, the planets, and the rain to allow vegetation to grow.
Not possible to debunk atheism. It is possible for you to completely misunderstand it, however.
why is not possible to debunk atheism? you guys dont have 1 solid answer or even half a solid answer that certainly denies the existence of God, The oldest athiests in history and most notable ones never even denied the Existence of the creator they just had trouble grasping how the world came out to be.
@Quack Epistemologist prove there’s a god then, any god. Has never been done.
@@alialishammari854 atheism is not being convinced of the claim a god exists. So there’s nothing to debunk. I don’t believe your claim about god-that’s it.
@@warrencolegrove1 that conviction/uncertainty is based off of what nothingness? Ofc its based off of thoughts/assumptions/hallucinations and what not. Didnt science teach you that you can argue those and debunk them? My God what an age we live in
@Quack Epistemologist I was t trying to
My pint is to show you have no good reason to believe, no evidence, just faith
Your god of the gaps rebuttal is weak.
Science never lies. It can be misunderstood but it never conceals the truth.
Yes we have evidence that god never did a thing for humanity like science has. Humanity has advanced bcuz of science and not bcuz of god.
God has never did a thing for humanity? The amount of arrogance in and ignorance in that sentence is unreal, science itself disagrees with you, logic disagrees with you and so does everything else. What has God given us? Everything good is thanks to Allah, the same brain, fingers and whatever you used to type that message is blessings from God. Stop trying to build a connection between your senses and what exists and not it doesnt work that way, science doesnt work thay way too. If i were to hold a pen and say thay this coincedentally came out of no where you'd never agree with that in a million years however you agree that this entire vast and vast is an understatement universe and what is in it randomly appeared with all its bits and details? How faulty,irrational, illogical, contradictory with whats real and the human thought process is that Tony? Why do you think you have to see something with youre own eyes for it to be visible?
@@alialishammari854 ….evidence?
Just bcuz you say it’s God doesn’t mean it’s true.
The arrogance and ignorance is tipped heavily in your favor.
The only realm science does not go is the supernatural realm and there is no evidence for a supernatural realm.
@ali alsetri science doesn’t need to answer these questions as there is no evidence for them.
@ali alsetri we are here bcuz this planet is able to sustain life. That’s it that’s all.
@ali alsetri there is no evidence for the supernatural. Science works on evidence and experimentation.
Sayed mentions the supernatural realm.
@ali alsetri
science will comprehend all these questions and get better soon
Kiddo don't think like your religion who dosen't get better every day
Science does
we're suffering to create new things
Hopefully we'll see atheists get some justice due to how violent they're treated
Ethics guides scientific exploration but is clearly lacking among the religious.