Failure to Crosscheck (Austrian Airlines Flight 901) - DISASTER BREAKDOWN

แชร์
ฝัง
  • เผยแพร่เมื่อ 28 ก.ย. 2024

ความคิดเห็น • 216

  • @DisasterBreakdown
    @DisasterBreakdown  ปีที่แล้ว +26

    Get 25% off Blinkist premium and enjoy 2 memberships for the price of 1! Start your 7-day free trial by clicking here: www.blinkist.com/disasterbreakdown
    Thank you to Blinkist for Sponsoring this video.

    • @DrAuthorite1
      @DrAuthorite1 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      Can you make a video about Turkish airlines flight 981? it would be super interesting!!!

    • @zacclacherryYT
      @zacclacherryYT ปีที่แล้ว

      ⁰⁰

    • @zacclacherryYT
      @zacclacherryYT ปีที่แล้ว

      you have nice videos

  • @Crossark1
    @Crossark1 ปีที่แล้ว +123

    “One can imagine that with such a discrepancy, conflict could occur between the plane and the ground.” Such a polite way to phrase that

    • @beccyvc5743
      @beccyvc5743 ปีที่แล้ว +7

      This made me laugh, I know it shouldn't have.

    • @steewith2ees14
      @steewith2ees14 ปีที่แล้ว +11

      Same here hehehe. I cannot decide which was funnier - that or the reference to the US use of mg of mercury "because, of course".

    • @paulazemeckis7835
      @paulazemeckis7835 3 หลายเดือนก่อน

      Just like a Brit - always polite!

  • @robm3074
    @robm3074 ปีที่แล้ว +353

    Chloe… when you were marketing Blinkest on your video you mentioned "that you were not that smart" . That is a bunch of nonsense. You are very intelligent, you make very good videos, you have a lot to offer. So please please please do not sell yourself short.

    • @DisasterBreakdown
      @DisasterBreakdown  ปีที่แล้ว +206

      am the person that once put my phone in the post box instead of my letter and had to wait for the postman to come round to get it back...
      Thank you for your comment, I appreciate it :)

    • @someonee3186
      @someonee3186 ปีที่แล้ว +5

      Well said

    • @rubies200
      @rubies200 ปีที่แล้ว +54

      @@DisasterBreakdown That's a sign of a very intelligent person, though. You're thinking so much, that you get distracted!

    • @ragenetwork4112
      @ragenetwork4112 ปีที่แล้ว +2

      Who's Chloe?

    • @wajidiqbal84
      @wajidiqbal84 ปีที่แล้ว +2

      So your name is CHLOE?

  • @thejudgmentalcat
    @thejudgmentalcat ปีที่แล้ว +55

    I'd only flown a Piper Tomahawk a few hours 45 years ago and never thought how altimeters are calibrated. Very informative, if a bit disconcerting, video 👏

  • @localmenace3043
    @localmenace3043 ปีที่แล้ว +74

    I don’t know a lot about piloting or aircraft, but you always find a way to make it understandable.

  • @SKitty1732
    @SKitty1732 ปีที่แล้ว +100

    It's lovely to see how far you come with your channel, seeing you get your first sponsor makes me overjoyed because it means you're doing great! Keep it up Chloe!

    • @DisasterBreakdown
      @DisasterBreakdown  ปีที่แล้ว +28

      Thanks, this actually wasn't my first sponsored segment. I did a couple way back in 2021. It's been a while since I had one, I'm very picky about what I promote.

    • @SKitty1732
      @SKitty1732 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      @@DisasterBreakdown ah my bad xD still proud of you!

    • @pennywaltz4601
      @pennywaltz4601 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      Oh could you do Bea 548 that accident highlights the need for cockpit voice recorder for passenger flights, the accident led to a greater emphasis on crew resource management, and a greater caution before allowing off-duty crew members to occupy flight deck seats?

    • @sailaab
      @sailaab ปีที่แล้ว +1

      Thank you for continually making such detailed and painstakingly researched (minj) documentaries.
      .
      Being a paraplegic since birth..
      .. i can only experience most of aviation as an outsider only.
      .
      And I am from finance background.
      .
      Still.. of my limited undeserving.. I would say that your technical explanation of the barometric terms in aviation.. was simpler to follow.. than perhaps even Petter (Mentour Pilot), Joe (Captain Joe).
      .
      Our wishes are always with you.. in all of your sincere endeavour endeavours.
      .
      Greetings🤍💙 from the middle of nowhere ..in India.

    • @DrAuthorite1
      @DrAuthorite1 ปีที่แล้ว

      @@DisasterBreakdown Can you make a video about Turkish airlines flight 981? it would be super interesting!!!

  • @johnbowles5399
    @johnbowles5399 ปีที่แล้ว +12

    Big admirer of your channel and the work you put into researching these tragic accidents. I always think of the poor souls who perish in these disasters.

  • @TheMightyZwom
    @TheMightyZwom ปีที่แล้ว +4

    I've known that altimeters in airplanes work by measuring pressure. However, I've never given the fact much thought that air pressure changes based on the weather which should have a drastic influence on the accuracy of the reading. Thank you for the explanation on how the calibration works.

    • @thatguyalex2835
      @thatguyalex2835 ปีที่แล้ว

      Hopefully in the future, planes could use GPS altimeters, or maybe even LIDAR altimeters for altitude above ground, but if the GPS or LIDAR (laser distance measuring) system were to fail, it would still be beneficial to learn to use the barometric altimeter.

  • @Xaddre
    @Xaddre ปีที่แล้ว +11

    Wednesday upload?!?!?! Let’s go!!!

    • @DisasterBreakdown
      @DisasterBreakdown  ปีที่แล้ว +7

      Yep and I'll be hitting you with another one this weekend! :)

  • @sydyidanton5873
    @sydyidanton5873 ปีที่แล้ว +3

    Hi Chloe, I’m not sure if you’ll even read this, I just wanted to tell you that your explanation of how altimeters work was excellent. Extremely well broken down and explained.
    I love the quality of your work, I can appreciate the tremendous effort you put into making these. Considering you are not from an aviation background your information is brilliantly explained and on point. Magnificent!
    Regarding your comment with the Blinkist sponsorship and your personal intelligence, please do NOT underestimate yourself, you are clearly a very intelligent person, the exceptional standards in the work you are doing testify to that.
    You are indeed most talented, and I am grateful for your effort. Best regards. Cheers, Anton

  • @buildingsheriff
    @buildingsheriff ปีที่แล้ว +2

    What a BRILLIANT episode! Thanks.

  • @Rochi47
    @Rochi47 ปีที่แล้ว +4

    You've finally got another sponsor! Your channel is becoming bigger everyday. Congratulations 🎉.

  • @alchemite
    @alchemite ปีที่แล้ว +6

    Thanks Chloe ! :))
    You've made my week, and happy new year by the way!

  • @pawelgrott1278
    @pawelgrott1278 ปีที่แล้ว +2

    11:50
    'Assuming that Cpt was flying and his instrument was showing the LOWER reading...' - wouldn't it mean that FO must had flown the aircraft since they collided?
    Great video!

  • @irenetorkel2186
    @irenetorkel2186 ปีที่แล้ว +7

    As always an entertaining and educational video. The fact you put so much information into a relatively short video is amazing. I never fail to learn something. This is the first video I’ve been able to watch immediately instead of having to wait for work to end. I’m so happy 😊

  • @planck39
    @planck39 ปีที่แล้ว +6

    I'm confused. The captains Altimeter was set right to QFE, elevation above ground. When it is assumed that the captain was flying, was it the first officer that made false elevation call outs from his wrongly set altimeter to QNH?

    • @PauperJ
      @PauperJ ปีที่แล้ว +1

      That's what I was thinking.

    • @fabianyt123
      @fabianyt123 ปีที่แล้ว

      Ye that must be it. If captain was flying and taking his height instead, he would have flown 700ft too high instead

  • @missfleming5465
    @missfleming5465 ปีที่แล้ว +10

    I'm gonna tell you what I tell my niece(also a Chloe) "I don't want to hear you say you're not that smart come out your mouth". You are smart Chloe the amount of work you put in writing a script, researching topics etc is something a smart person can do. Keep up the good work I've got zero clue how long I've been subscribed to DB because I'm so engrossed in your video.

  • @dianaespiritosanto5813
    @dianaespiritosanto5813 10 หลายเดือนก่อน

    Such excellent explanations for the instruments, the systems behind them and how they are operated. This really is the best channel to understand how air accidents occur to the detail. Congratulations!

  • @claudiacook619
    @claudiacook619 ปีที่แล้ว +3

    'Conflict would occur between the plane and the ground'
    Well... that's one way of putting it

    • @ohioguy215
      @ohioguy215 ปีที่แล้ว

      Crashing would be more appropriate. The ground doesn't care what you do.

  • @protodvd
    @protodvd ปีที่แล้ว +1

    Just want to add that this is definitely the preferable way to do in-video ad placement - no stupid wordplay or segues, just "I'm pausing briefly to tell you about the product" and a "that said, let's get on with the video." Would be happy to keep seeing it done that way.

  • @MothaLuva
    @MothaLuva ปีที่แล้ว +1

    There was a contributing factor afaik. At that time a Russian navigator who also worked as a translator was required and carried on board every non Russian flight allowed to enter Russian airspace.
    Many, if not most, Russian ATC controllers did not speak English (or any other western language), thus the translator requirement. In a high workload environment (f. e. bad weather approaches) this is just a recipe for desaster.
    I shared some experience with the son of the first officer on this flight (Wolf Dietrich Freisleben).

  • @gnarthdarkanen7464
    @gnarthdarkanen7464 ปีที่แล้ว +5

    Great episode as usual, Chloe!!!
    AND hell yeah! I'm definitely looking forward to a second channel where you might bring a level-headed exposition to aviation-related conspiracy theories... I've seen a few channels try to bring up theories, but they have a tendency to either push the "entertainment" button a little far... OR (at least occasionally) things get out into left field a bit further than "bat-shit territory" if we're perfectly honest...
    Would love to see and hear your take on some of them... ;o)

  • @tatyana5692
    @tatyana5692 ปีที่แล้ว

    A sponsor Chloe!!! That is so incredible!! Well deserved, I look forward to your videos every week. Glad we get an extra one today!

  • @justanotherjezebeI
    @justanotherjezebeI ปีที่แล้ว +6

    Oooo... a series on Aviation conspiracy theories would be absolutely fascinating.

  • @kevinheard8364
    @kevinheard8364 ปีที่แล้ว +2

    Great job, as always . looking forward to the next one :)

  • @hihey229
    @hihey229 ปีที่แล้ว

    Get that bag! Thank you for all the work you do and consistently having subtitles on your bids Chloe!

  • @melissers5282
    @melissers5282 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    My hypothesis is that the copilot simply left their altimeter set to standard pressure from cruise instead of inputting the QNH given by the approach controller. Then, when they were on their short final, the captain was probably looking outside to establish visual contact with the runway while the first officer was calling out altitude and distance checks for the captain's approach (which were unfortunately wrong being provided by the FOs incorrectly set altimeter). This would mean they began hitting the trees even though the first officer's altimeter would be reading a couple hundred meters and, according to this faulty reading, they thought they were on profile. Hope that gives some closure to everyone who thought the investigation didn't really answer the question of why they actually crashed. Like, yes, it was the altimeters, but they didn't elaborate on how the captain had the correct altitude right in front of him but ignored it.

  • @pascalcoole2725
    @pascalcoole2725 3 หลายเดือนก่อน

    Sometimes, preparing for approach the PnF sets the Alt to QNH (QFE is hardly used these day's) while the PF Alt still is set on STD until passing below Transition Altitude (or transition Level, not sure anymore, long ago but Alt makes more sense)
    They just might have forgotten to check when below Transition Alt. It's a bussy process on (by now) antiquated equipment and meanwhile one has to retink between Meters and Feet.

  • @greghardy9476
    @greghardy9476 9 หลายเดือนก่อน

    I retired from the aviation maintenance profession after 40+ years. We used to say that aircraft were thousands of parts flying in loose formation. When I started my civilian career, my supervisor stated that “nothing we work on here will cause a crash”. With more than a little incredulity I replied that a 3 cent machine screw can cause a crash! The stress caused by the news of an aircraft accident was always there.

  • @AdrianColley
    @AdrianColley ปีที่แล้ว +1

    Use the word "altitude" only for distance above mean sea level. Use "height" only for distance above ground level. Or you can use the abbreviations AMSL and AGL

  • @6yjjk
    @6yjjk ปีที่แล้ว +3

    If the captain was flying, and his altimeter was reading *lower* than the co-pilot's, then surely they would have levelled off 700' too *high* and not hit the ground?

  • @arinerm1331
    @arinerm1331 ปีที่แล้ว

    I'm addicted to analyses of air incidents, and this one was **VERY** insightful. I would also love to see an analysis of the infamous Hainan Island Incident of 2001, but my bet is that public reports are hard to come by.

  • @tarotbrarian
    @tarotbrarian ปีที่แล้ว

    Chloe, you are a gem. Keep up the good work. 😊

  • @PFMediaServices
    @PFMediaServices ปีที่แล้ว

    Chloe, I sent you an email recently and I hope it didn't go to spam! Very happy to have this extra video! ✌️🍍

  • @springbok4015
    @springbok4015 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    Congrats on the sponsor!

  • @MothaLuva
    @MothaLuva ปีที่แล้ว

    8:30 That „some point“ is called transition altitude in climb and transition level in descend.

  • @harlequinn2526
    @harlequinn2526 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    i think it’d be cool if you had a video only talking about all of the conspiracy theories surrounding various crashes
    obviously a disclaimer would be involved but i think a big reason why some plane crashes are more famous than others is because of the conspiracy theories that surround them
    a while ago you had a video that i think was eastern airlines flight 401 that crashed in florida and you mentioned the phenomenon where flight attendants and residents supposedly saw the ghosts of the former passengers, and i think it added a really cool layer to the video

    • @wp8022
      @wp8022 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      There's also a conspiracy theory about Austrian Airlines 901.

  • @shola1213
    @shola1213 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    A sponsor??!! Get it girl!!!

  • @joequinal
    @joequinal ปีที่แล้ว

    Wonderful job! My favorite part of your video is when you say “Hello Everyone” before Patreon members 😂. I say it in stereo with you as I watch. I’m joking but really do love your vids. 🤣🔥

  • @jerryweirdspeed8943
    @jerryweirdspeed8943 ปีที่แล้ว

    It's true pilots do not know their actual altitude above the ground for the most part of higher altitude flying. And there is only one chance to know exactly. That is before the plane takes off. Especially, when there is no radio altimeter or satellite based 3D navigation available. Stunning good and extensive explanation.

  • @moiraatkinson
    @moiraatkinson ปีที่แล้ว

    Yay! Newcastle airport! That’s where I live 😊. I notice you give the 4-letter code, but it’s always known as NCL on baggage tags etc. Interesting video - yours always are. I tend not to go in for conspiracy theories, especially if investigators find nothing suspicious. Whenever the exact cause of an accident can’t be determined they always seem to arise.

  • @Dovietail
    @Dovietail ปีที่แล้ว +1

    Too much work. I'm taking the train!

  • @oldstrawhat4193
    @oldstrawhat4193 ปีที่แล้ว +2

    I really LOVE your videos! But I really HATE the music. Will you please go back to just narration only? Please?

  • @Caracaraorangeberry
    @Caracaraorangeberry ปีที่แล้ว

    it appears that even if the altimeters were synchronized, they still would have do to be synchronized correctly- to the QNH.

  • @knrdvmmlbkkn
    @knrdvmmlbkkn ปีที่แล้ว

    12:52 Someone's good at math!

  • @MrWaheedulHaque
    @MrWaheedulHaque ปีที่แล้ว +1

    you need to put your voice levels up on these videos, i run them at full volume and struggle to hear them unless the room is entirely quiet, even today i got headphones on instead of playing on speaker and struggling to hear them, the background sound is louder than the video :(

    • @DisasterBreakdown
      @DisasterBreakdown  ปีที่แล้ว +1

      Thanks for the feedback. I'll boost a bit more in the next video

    • @MrWaheedulHaque
      @MrWaheedulHaque ปีที่แล้ว +1

      @@DisasterBreakdown thanks boss apprieciate it cos i do love your videos i just struggle to hear them sometimes :), keep up the good work

  • @747-8F
    @747-8F ปีที่แล้ว

    there have been many accidents due to QFE settings.. I never used them ,but I think it makes one lose the awareness of the real obstacle elevations around. This must be especially true for companies/pilots mixing these settings,which can easily be done when flying into an airport with the remark "QFE operations not allowed"
    disaster will eventually happen

    • @peteconrad2077
      @peteconrad2077 ปีที่แล้ว

      Indeed. QNH is widely recognised as safer.

  • @martcon6757
    @martcon6757 ปีที่แล้ว

    So which alti was wrong? If the Capt was in command and his alti was displaying 700ft lower than actual, then surely his decent to zero and touch down, would have resulted in the aircraft being still 700 ft above the runway. But if the Co pilot was in command and his alti displayed 700 above actual, then his decent would certainly have resulted in the aircraft striking the ground short of the threshold. So which alti was wrong and can it definitely be said which of the flight crew was in command of the aircraft during the approach?
    From what I can make out if the Capt was commanding the aircraft it should not have struck the ground even if his alti was showing an incorrect lower reading.

  • @Tony-pm5xo
    @Tony-pm5xo ปีที่แล้ว

    I think mentour pilot made a video about a modern plane flying 2 meters above the ground for pretty much the same mistake. Automation can only help so much, I suppose.

  • @eriesara6424
    @eriesara6424 ปีที่แล้ว +2

    1:18 excuse you Chloe, Ms. Aviation Researcher And Educational Content Producer, you are VERY smart. Please be kind to yourself, mmk? :)

  • @marksmith8079
    @marksmith8079 ปีที่แล้ว

    That Viscount had only have two crew- its has space for three. Much later aircraft always had a flight engineer. Then with flight engineer he should have noted down settings.

    • @marksmith8079
      @marksmith8079 ปีที่แล้ว

      According to Wikipedia it has only two crew seats- that is totally unbelievable.

  • @Nicole-je6bz
    @Nicole-je6bz ปีที่แล้ว

    Newcastle airport gang!!

  • @MoejoTheGreat
    @MoejoTheGreat 4 หลายเดือนก่อน

    Inches of mercury is the correct unit, the victors get to choose that sort of thing.

  • @gabrielnilsson7955
    @gabrielnilsson7955 ปีที่แล้ว

    Great videos as always! But, you dont need to "fill out" with the music. It's a lot better without. Just my opinion 🙂 ♥️

    • @pup1008
      @pup1008 ปีที่แล้ว

      I think maybe he gets sponsorship for playing them?
      I never hear them anyway.

    • @bwc1976
      @bwc1976 ปีที่แล้ว

      I couldn't even hear the music!

  • @Driftking0311
    @Driftking0311 ปีที่แล้ว +2

    Now that I’m thinking about this air disaster was caused by pilot error. I don’t believe those theories. I just think it’s pilot and crew error that brought flight 901 down. Because it was due to the pilot and the first officer not having the same feet diameter or whatever it’s called that brought the plane down. Just simply pilot error.

    • @peteconrad2077
      @peteconrad2077 ปีที่แล้ว

      A proper analysis has to ask why they made that error.

  • @trainz3982
    @trainz3982 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    The simplest of issues "
    😄

  • @JimmyJamesJ
    @JimmyJamesJ ปีที่แล้ว +2

    In the case of a conflict between the plane and the ground, the ground will always win.

  • @Dovietail
    @Dovietail ปีที่แล้ว

    6 second in. Vienna to Moscow...I'm already suspecting espionage.

    • @wp8022
      @wp8022 ปีที่แล้ว

      Actually there IS a conspiracy theory about this incident.

  • @boosterboyzaen8323
    @boosterboyzaen8323 ปีที่แล้ว

    Chloe, did you misspell satellite photograph at 4:20

  • @Nietzman
    @Nietzman 5 หลายเดือนก่อน

    Yeah this is what Die Hard 2 was based on.

  • @cpchehaibar
    @cpchehaibar ปีที่แล้ว

    The Vickers Viscount had the weirdest 'facial features' of most planes of its age.

    • @ohioguy215
      @ohioguy215 ปีที่แล้ว

      That's what my my wife said about me. I bought her new glasses so she wouldn't notice my three eyes.

  • @wajidiqbal84
    @wajidiqbal84 ปีที่แล้ว +3

    Who is CHLOE?

    • @wajidiqbal84
      @wajidiqbal84 ปีที่แล้ว

      Do we still need pseudonyms?

    • @NeoTheKuria
      @NeoTheKuria ปีที่แล้ว +2

      Idk, maybe the sibling of Disaster Breakdown.

  • @skoldmo762
    @skoldmo762 ปีที่แล้ว

    Back then. Even non communist countries like sweden did use meter in altitude. It was in 1990 it changed to feet as national standard.

  • @Aleksei-p9g
    @Aleksei-p9g 3 วันที่ผ่านมา

    I don't think that conspiracy theories fit your content, I wouldn't mention that stuff.

  • @Lucian-n10
    @Lucian-n10 5 หลายเดือนก่อน

    Aua halt🤷

  • @kristennironen8260
    @kristennironen8260 ปีที่แล้ว

    Nice vid, Ty.
    Just saying, Moscow is still the capital of Russia

  • @thesilentgeneration
    @thesilentgeneration ปีที่แล้ว

    All this minute inputs complicate things, and it would be easy to forget to do something that could cause the plane to crash. Too much detail and we wonder why planes crash. You put your life in the hands of another human that can lead to disaster when you fly. Oh, sure they will find out why, so it will not happen again, but you are still dead. How many plane crashes can you survive? In a car?

    • @peteconrad2077
      @peteconrad2077 ปีที่แล้ว

      They’re not done for the hell of it.

  • @thomaskoss7477
    @thomaskoss7477 5 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

    It really is an ugly plane.

  • @RiftWalker111
    @RiftWalker111 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    Ah yes...once again America's silly decision to keep the imperial system strikes again. Seriously change it already, being different doesn't make you quirky and interesting 😑. Rest in paradise to those people who lost their lives.

  • @Epic_C
    @Epic_C ปีที่แล้ว +1

    Still don't know why all of this stuff hasn't been changed to metric globally.

  • @PauperJ
    @PauperJ ปีที่แล้ว +11

    Terrific video. I appreciate the in-depth descriptions that you always do.
    Looking forward to your second YT channel, "Disaster Conspiracies."

  • @akschmidt2085
    @akschmidt2085 ปีที่แล้ว +6

    "Conflict between the plane and the ground" is my new favourite expression. Funny how the ground always wins those arguments...😄 well done video, thumbs up

  • @AzovAzza
    @AzovAzza ปีที่แล้ว +11

    I’m so glad I found your channel. I absolutely love your content and coverage. The way you break things down for better understanding. The time, effort and energy that you put in… It’s fantastic. Thank you so much!!!✈️

  • @OBB-qs4dh
    @OBB-qs4dh ปีที่แล้ว +9

    WOW! I am impressed. Indeed a rarely mentioned accident with a lot of mystery and Mandy stories around it! And for sure very unknown - even in my home country of Austria. Thank you!

  • @mycroftsanchez901
    @mycroftsanchez901 ปีที่แล้ว +35

    Interesting to hear about an incedent from over 60 years ago and compare how things have changed, black boxes, ILS systems etc.
    Thanks for posting.

  • @Thedribblerr
    @Thedribblerr ปีที่แล้ว +10

    I’ve watched your channel for a while now and I’m so happy you got a sponsor! You deserve it so much and your channel is incredible!

  • @scottmoseley5122
    @scottmoseley5122 ปีที่แล้ว +4

    good work.. Thanks for the in depth Altimeter explanation.

  • @VoidStarchan
    @VoidStarchan ปีที่แล้ว +17

    Congratulations on getting a Sponsor! Really love your videos, hope to see a lot more in the future! Cheers!

  • @nigelbond4056
    @nigelbond4056 ปีที่แล้ว +4

    Another fascinating video with clear and simple explanations on the technical details. And then you go and tell us you’re not bright Chloe? 😂

  • @KathrynsWorldWildfireTracking
    @KathrynsWorldWildfireTracking ปีที่แล้ว +3

    12:00 - "Conflict would occur between the plane and the ground."
    _I salute your use of understatements. More powerful than saying "so they're gonna crash."_

  • @darkfox2076
    @darkfox2076 ปีที่แล้ว +12

    Great commentary and super interesting as always thanks Chloe

  • @jfangm
    @jfangm 11 หลายเดือนก่อน +2

    "I'm not very smart myself"
    Says the person making detailed aviation disaster videos on par with professional documentaries AND is a certified private pilot. Don't sell yourself short.

  • @Ian-lx1iz
    @Ian-lx1iz ปีที่แล้ว +2

    ¿Que?
    Surely if the Captain's altimeter has a _lower_ reference pressure, then it will read zero when the plane is zero feet above the ground.
    The co-pilot's altimeter, with _higher_ (sea level) reference pressure, will give an altitude of 700 feet when the plane is actually on the ground (zero feet).
    Therefore, trying to land this plane in reference to the _Co-Pilot's_ altimeter will crash the plane, and NOT in reference to the _Captain's_ altimeter.
    Have I got that right?
    (Trying to understand)

  • @dogevid
    @dogevid ปีที่แล้ว +2

    I knew you read my comment

  • @LNDND
    @LNDND ปีที่แล้ว +3

    hello are you going to do us airways 1549 yet.

    • @LNDND
      @LNDND ปีที่แล้ว +2

      Also great video😁

    • @DisasterBreakdown
      @DisasterBreakdown  ปีที่แล้ว +7

      Maybe... it is a very well documented incident. If people want it enough I'll put it on my list

  • @hernerweisenberg7052
    @hernerweisenberg7052 6 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

    Sad that the aviation community is going backwards in time by adopting inferior measurement units. Ok my plane got a glide ratio of 10:1, im at 3km altitude, so i can glide 30km. My plane is at 10000 feet, so i can glide 100000 feet, wich is how many nautical miles? ;*(

  • @henrikpicton5486
    @henrikpicton5486 ปีที่แล้ว +4

    Great video as always.

  • @洪梓恩-p7z
    @洪梓恩-p7z ปีที่แล้ว +2

    Just finished another college semester's class here, and I would say that every number and calculations in literally EVERYTHING in this industry are important and should be cross-checked and double-checked every single time.
    This case reminds me of an accident that'll soon be made as one of the episode of Mayday season 23- Independent Air flight 1851.
    I think the crew of Independent air flight 1851 misheard the pressure reading due to accent of the controller and radio statics, but the biggest mistake made by the crew was not inputting the wrong readings into altimeter. The crew ignored ground proximity warning and crashed onto the side of the mountain.
    In the end, a little reminder with no relation to this episode here. I watched several old episodes of disaster breakdown while doing homework few days ago, and I learned that an episode about Madrid airport collision was suppose to come out before 2023 (which didn't happen). I don't really know if you're a busy person or the topics for disaster breakdown are piling up, but if you're busy, there's no need for uploading this episode to be top priority. I'm just looking forward for this episode to come out at anytime, and once again, there's no need to rush to make and upload this episode. Thank you very much and wish you have a good day!

  • @nyxqueenofshadows
    @nyxqueenofshadows ปีที่แล้ว +2

    congrats on getting another sponsor! really interesting info on the altimeter, i'd never considered how they were calibrated before and for some reason thought it would be simpler! great video, as always :)

  • @northbytrain
    @northbytrain ปีที่แล้ว +1

    i was a bit shocked when i saw my local airport in this video- i didnt expect it
    i wont say which for privacy reasons

  • @bwc1976
    @bwc1976 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    Wow, I've been pronouncing Viscount wrong all these years! Great video as always. Also, where was the photo at 8:46 taken?

  • @momentomori-rw6jp
    @momentomori-rw6jp ปีที่แล้ว +1

    YEEEEAAHHH MID WEEK UPLOAD!! 🎉

  • @TamaleLoco95
    @TamaleLoco95 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    "In the United States, because of course, they use a completely different measurement..." I'm American and went to school for engineering, and had this thought at least twice a week.

  • @NorwayT
    @NorwayT ปีที่แล้ว

    @DisasterBreakdown - you mentioned Barometric Altimeters. I'm no expert on these old crates, but I believe it was around the time of this accident that Radio Altimeters became more and more common on Commercial Flights. Do you know if the accident plane was equipped with a Radio Altimeter?

  • @itsgib8191
    @itsgib8191 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    Me double checking the date cause I was surprised to see a video on a Wednesday 😂 I thought I was losing my mind

  • @simpilotadamt1012
    @simpilotadamt1012 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    8:44 I just want to mention that the actual standard pressure in hPa is 1013.25hPa. On any plane with digital altimeters (like the B737NG or A320 series), setting the QNH to 1013hPa will actually display a slightly lower altitude than if the altimeter is set to standard. The difference is minute but there. 29.92 inHg is fully accurate, though.

    • @peteconrad2077
      @peteconrad2077 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      Standard is actually 29.9212 so an imperial altimeter isn’t precisely accurate either.

  • @PeterHarveySPP
    @PeterHarveySPP 5 หลายเดือนก่อน

    Chloe, I love your videos, enjoy the perspective, and your voice is perfect! Hugs.

  • @Chic01taliano
    @Chic01taliano ปีที่แล้ว

    When will content creators learn to chapterize sponsors? Thanks for the video though.

  • @angelwhitener6968
    @angelwhitener6968 8 หลายเดือนก่อน

    I tell ppl that my memory is as long as my d*^k and I def don’t have one, so that’s usually a good analogy that everybody seems to understand..!! Absolutely love, love, love your channel, Chloe..!! Has always been excellent, professional, super informative, while being amazingly presented .. however, I am so proud at how your presentation of your channel and videos have progressed thru the years, and seem to grow with each one being better (if possible ) than the one before ..!! It’s been and continues to be so exciting to watch you grow along with your channel and its subscribers, contributions, and sponsors..!! So proud of you as you should be so proud for yourself..!! The sky is the limit and don’t ever let anyone steal your shine..!! Keep on keepin on, love..!! Apologies for the long ass comment but I had a lot to say..!! Thank you for all your hard work you put into your videos, and it shows..!! Much love from NC, USA ..
    ps: (I know sorry) do we get a little sneak peek after your recovery ..?) speedy recovery to you..!!

  • @TheMaximac
    @TheMaximac ปีที่แล้ว

    Height above ground, QFE. Not altitude. Altitude above sea level, QNH. Remember aviation Professionals watch your video.