For the ppl saying there is no difference fps means frames per second and he slowed 1000 fps on purpose so that we can preview all frames Edit : Ok, so due to me not using punctuations the comment feels incomplete or has some grammatical mistake, lemme fix that and add up some things to clear confusions in the replies For the ppl saying there is no difference, fps means frames per second. He showed us 3 clips, in which we can see the amount of brown particles emerge out at same time but in different frames per second, showing the difference that having more fps helps us achieve more detail and information and ultra slow motion. And for the people saying that all 3 clips should've been in the same speed as original for comparison , I agree. But according to me the main purpose of the uploaded for this video was to show, having higher fps can help us achieve "ultra slow motion and more information", thus he extended the duration of the lower fps clips till the duration of the clip with the highest fps (in the 1000fps clip the ball falls the earliest whereas in the 240fps clip, the ball starts to fall later than that of others) , hope this comment helps understand people better Also another small note when the cameras were done recording the original 3 clips might have been of only 1 or 0.5 seconds, the uploader later on slowed the clips in his editing software. (basically people generally record in high fps so that they can slow it down later on, and also, so that it doesn't look choppy while they are at it)
The video was shot into 1000FPD for 1 second so it took 1000 images then it got reduced to 60FPS so the duration we get is 1000/60 which is approximately 17seconds in slow-motion
Eyes cant see more than 60-90 frames per sec so if u play or watch a movie over 90 fps u will just feel its a bit smoother but like over 144 its just a waste of money
A more complete explanation: All of these videos take the course of just a few seconds, and with higher frames per second it doesn’t necessarily mean that the video is inherently slower. When you raise the fps you’re still capturing the same few seconds, however to view every single frame you will have to slow the video down. The reason the lower FPS videos look faster is because there is less frames to go in between. Yes you can slow the lower FPS videos down to match the speed of the 1,000fps, however it will jitter/stutter as the frames are interpolated (there’s like 3 techniques for slowing down footage that I know) between each other. If you were to play a game with 20,000FPS the game would not look slow at all, you are not able to see all 20,000 frames in 1 second, but it will look very smooth and fluid in your eyes because there is more data to fill in the gaps. And before a smart Alec says “But, monitors can’t even display 20,000FPS”, You’re absolutely right, which is why the video is slowed down in the first place.
To be honest, I don't know how some people don't understand that when seeing it, it's not that hard to understand, even without an explaination, just seeing it's slower the higher fps should already be enough to understand.. (well, that's how I understood and I was probably 10)
So actually, a higher fps is way better. The higher the fps, the slower the movement around you in a game like call of duty would be. This means that you can see more in the same amount of time giving you more time to react.
No, since 480 FPS is in the middle, it makes you feel that way because it is more clearly visible. If 1000 FPS were in the middle, then 1000 FPS would look more better to your eyes.
so basically fps means frames per second, when you have more of it, it allows it to be slower and get more frames in one second so 800000 frames per second would be very very slow compared to 60 fps because it’s allowing 800000 frames into 1 second of footage vs 60
To be more specific: Humans see at like 12 to 24 images per seconds if I remember correctly, and fps mean the number of frames per second, if you somehow record at 1000fps it won't be automatically slower, there will just be 1000 frames in 1 second instead of 30 or 60 but by making so that you see 30 of the 1000 frames each seconds it will be slowed down and you will see the video in slow motion, also to human eyes anything above 30 to 60 fps (if isn't slowed down) feels the same as eyes sees slower
@@noamsoleil2610 bro ur replying to like a billion people with the same nonsense replies. ur comment is dumb. do more research. ur blurting out stupidity
Eyes sees at 12 to 24 images per seconds if I remember correctly, that's why you can see some "jumps" in 12fps videos or animations, but you can't above 24fps if you saw faster you would
@@noamsoleil2610bruh what. a. we do not see in frames, and b. that is the stupidest shit ive ever heard. 24 fps has no fucking relevancy. all 24fps is, is the framerate movies are published at. in general, our eyes process infinite images.
@@svensantesson2020 you are right! Humans see at like 12 to 24 images per seconds if I remember correctly, and fps mean the number of frames per second, if you somehow record at 1000fps it won't be automatically slower, there will just be 1000 frames in 1 second instead of 30 or 60 but by making so that you see 30 of the 1000 frames each seconds it will be slowed down and you will see the video in slow motion, also to human eyes anything above 30 to 60 fps (if isn't slowed down) feels the same as eyes sees slower
Yall misunderstood something. This clip is at respective fps but for comparison. They all calibrate to play at the same frame rate to compare. That being said higher fps has more frames in it so when it is set to play back at lower fps. It becomes slower . Let say you want to compare between 60 and 120 fps. Both this video then being compared and being set play at 30 fps. Now because the amount of frames in a second it has. 60 fps would take 2 seconds to play all rendered 60 frames while 120 fps would take double the amount of that time just to play all 120 of the rendered frames when you play back the video at 30 fps by displaying all the 120 rendered frames without skipping. Hence why higher fps seems slower and lower fps has faster playback. This video is about previewing all the rendered frames at fixed fps for all videos being rendered at different fps.
@@johnchamp67 that's the point... If you would slow down a 30 fps video as much as the top video here then it would be laggy af. But with 1000 fps it's totally smooth
You ought to make each of them last equally long so you can see the step difference between the FPS amounts. Unless it wasn’t your point to show the difference between amount of detailed snapshots.
youtube plays at a set fps, much less than even 240
ปีที่แล้ว
@@cruze_the I know. But TH-cam didn’t render these videos side by side, he did that in an editor. He could f.e. Make the 1000fps drops played at 60hz and the others played at respectively lower hz. ~15hz for the 240fps. That would make them last as long as each other, but you can see the difference in details caught per second respective to their hz side by side.
Frames per second . Humans see at 60 fps . It's how many pics flash per second . The more the smoother it will look . Try changing from 120 fps to 90 to 60 to 30 on your camera to see difference
@@brandon..1 he managed to do it successfully.. By the way, humans see at like 12 to 24 images per seconds if I remember correctly, and fps mean the number of frames per second, if you somehow record at 1000fps it won't be automatically slower, there will just be 1000 frames in 1 second instead of 30 or 60 but by making so that you see 30 of the 1000 frames each seconds it will be slowed down and you will see the video in slow motion, also to human eyes anything above 30 to 60 fps (if isn't slowed down) feels the same as eyes sees slower
I never saw a difference of fps above 60.. but the slowmotion is amazing.. I remeber back when the Warp program about that super slow motion camera was a thing, and we where able for the first time to watch scenes hundreds of times slower. Maybe in a few years it will be accessible to most to have a 500 to 1000fps camera like we can have smartphones now that allow most to use something only the rich could before.
Fun fact: the framerate of your vision is generally around 60-90 fps, but can sometimes get up to 500 fps. So if somebody says that a 1,000 frame 1 second animations looks better than a 500 frame one second animation, they are probly lying.
You are viewing all the videos at 60fps. Its nor about smoothness, it's about the diference in "the time resolution". If you capture a second ina 120fps camera and playback at the natural 60. You will get a footage twice as slow as real life. More FPS means you can get even finer details in that time dimension. And as such, can slow down by a bigger factor. This is about capture speed. Not playback speed
High frames = potential to slow down to greater levels without degradation in flow Low frames = cannot be slowed down without degradation in flow Those scenes are depicting what limits those footages captured at different frame rates can be slowed down to without degradation in viewing quality
More fps doesnt equal slower, it just means that you can slow it down more without it looking really choppy, technically all of them could've been filmed with the 1000fps camera and then not slowed down so much
250- something cool to see
480- something you could use in a commercial
1000- something used for a emotional scene for a emotional movie
Please don't give 1000FPS cameras to Indian drama producers. The wind scenes revolving around the actress will be even longer than they already are.
@@asandax6 hahahha
anything above 24-30fps in movies would not look good un my opinion
@@triickshott yeah
@@asandax6 😂😂😂😂
For the ppl saying there is no difference fps means frames per second and he slowed 1000 fps on purpose so that we can preview all frames
Edit : Ok, so due to me not using punctuations the comment feels incomplete or has some grammatical mistake, lemme fix that and add up some things to clear confusions in the replies
For the ppl saying there is no difference, fps means frames per second. He showed us 3 clips, in which we can see the amount of brown particles emerge out at same time but in different frames per second, showing the difference that having more fps helps us achieve more detail and information and ultra slow motion.
And for the people saying that all 3 clips should've been in the same speed as original for comparison , I agree. But according to me the main purpose of the uploaded for this video was to show, having higher fps can help us achieve "ultra slow motion and more information", thus he extended the duration of the lower fps clips till the duration of the clip with the highest fps (in the 1000fps clip the ball falls the earliest whereas in the 240fps clip, the ball starts to fall later than that of others) , hope this comment helps understand people better
Also another small note when the cameras were done recording the original 3 clips might have been of only 1 or 0.5 seconds, the uploader later on slowed the clips in his editing software. (basically people generally record in high fps so that they can slow it down later on, and also, so that it doesn't look choppy while they are at it)
Yh what boy them ?
@@slashifyu1453 bro wad?
And then?
u was gonna say something bro where is it
Guys I wasn't gonna say smth else, that's it 💀
The video caught in 1000 fps but we see this in 30 fps💀💀💀
The video was shot into 1000FPD for 1 second so it took 1000 images then it got reduced to 60FPS so the duration we get is 1000/60 which is approximately 17seconds in slow-motion
💀💀💀💀💀
did you mean 60 fps?
@@ItachiUchiha-wt2mu
Check the quality, it only says 1080p, not 1080p60
For the people that don't understand the more the fps the more you can slow it down more with out looking choppy that's the simplest way to explain it
@@GLAUCONGAMES ok than you explain Mr I know everything
@@GLAUCONGAMES 5 yo
@@GLAUCONGAMESchild po
@@Deegan787so it’s trick to hide lag
What did he say!!
All those fps made me hungry
All those fps made me diabetes
@@K3ntucky123 and I’m dead 😂😂😂😂😂
ads on hd tv at electronic shops be like:
True… had tons of footage on those tvs it’s kinda hilarious
More FPS gives us the feeling of that moment. It feels like we are there in the frame 🥺
We need money 😢
No
Eyes cant see more than 60-90 frames per sec so if u play or watch a movie over 90 fps u will just feel its a bit smoother but like over 144 its just a waste of money
@@HOWTODOEVERYTHING101????
Bruh that is the most false thing i have ever read you havent even tried higher refresh rates@@KanYTKan_eki
A more complete explanation:
All of these videos take the course of just a few seconds, and with higher frames per second it doesn’t necessarily mean that the video is inherently slower.
When you raise the fps you’re still capturing the same few seconds, however to view every single frame you will have to slow the video down.
The reason the lower FPS videos look faster is because there is less frames to go in between. Yes you can slow the lower FPS videos down to match the speed of the 1,000fps, however it will jitter/stutter as the frames are interpolated (there’s like 3 techniques for slowing down footage that I know) between each other.
If you were to play a game with 20,000FPS the game would not look slow at all, you are not able to see all 20,000 frames in 1 second, but it will look very smooth and fluid in your eyes because there is more data to fill in the gaps.
And before a smart Alec says “But, monitors can’t even display 20,000FPS”, You’re absolutely right, which is why the video is slowed down in the first place.
Arec Bahwdwin
To be honest, I don't know how some people don't understand that when seeing it, it's not that hard to understand, even without an explaination, just seeing it's slower the higher fps should already be enough to understand.. (well, that's how I understood and I was probably 10)
I ain’t readin allat
@@dinoshartttclown
@@dinosharttt noob
240fps : Im fast as fuk boiiii
So actually, a higher fps is way better. The higher the fps, the slower the movement around you in a game like call of duty would be. This means that you can see more in the same amount of time giving you more time to react.
@@Brazeneliphone 15 pro max 1k fps
@@indrinurcahya838760 or 120
1000 fps is dramatic in a funny way
480 Fps Is Very Clear And Nice❤
Love 480
No, since 480 FPS is in the middle, it makes you feel that way because it is more clearly visible. If 1000 FPS were in the middle, then 1000 FPS would look more better to your eyes.
I think 1000 fps is good food commercials.
Rip hard drive lol, either way rest of this comment section is cracking me up ngl
Slowmo phantom footage eats up hard drives for sure
I can Still watch clearly in my smartphone screen with 60 fps
I edited this comment. You will never know this is why have so much likes 😈
It does not matter because it’s slo-mo
@@DeMarcusCousinsThethird.inda does bc I was on my 1000 fps pc and it was smooth but on my Chromebook with 40 fps is was not smooth
And TH-cam caps at 60 fps
@@OnIyVoid it doesn’t work that way
u can only see an amout ou hz on ur monitor
@@OnIyVoidlol mate i think u dont know what the fuck you are talking about, no screen can do 1k fps
This is the actual time i see a chocolate ball dropped into a powder so dramatically
Video: Frames per second
Rendering the scene: Flames per second
Uhhh that's not a render, it's a camera footage
240 fps lets you see slowed falling of the ball, 1000 fps lets you see the sand bits.
🔥
480 is the prettiest in my opinion
love the energy of 480
ist all the same except the 1000 fps is able to go slower without messing up
You’re pretty
U need 720p or more to see 60 fps
Balance is key
oddly relaxing
uhhh, now I totally get what a frame it's. Thank you so much! the details are everything
Stoked you dig it
No its the frames per second...
1fps = you only see a frame every second. slow asf
10fps = okay you see 1 frame every 100 milliseconds.
its really easy to understand
POV you're watching it a common 60 fps screen😂😂 and try to finding out difference
Joking ur self ?! Who said the video is 1000 fps?
Its max 60 fps
This 1000 fps is for slow-motion
so basically fps means frames per second, when you have more of it, it allows it to be slower and get more frames in one second so 800000 frames per second would be very very slow compared to 60 fps because it’s allowing 800000 frames into 1 second of footage vs 60
To be more specific: Humans see at like 12 to 24 images per seconds if I remember correctly, and fps mean the number of frames per second, if you somehow record at 1000fps it won't be automatically slower, there will just be 1000 frames in 1 second instead of 30 or 60 but by making so that you see 30 of the 1000 frames each seconds it will be slowed down and you will see the video in slow motion, also to human eyes anything above 30 to 60 fps (if isn't slowed down) feels the same as eyes sees slower
Forget the part before "if I remember".. got it wrong sorry
@@noamsoleil2610 bro ur replying to like a billion people with the same nonsense replies. ur comment is dumb. do more research. ur blurting out stupidity
@@noamsoleil2610your wrong bro eyes see in real time so you can see the difference but if it’s 1000 or higher it might be hard to notice from 900
Now all i want is chocolate.
Yeeeeeesssss🍫
Our brain can only show 200 pictures per second also i think its called pps
fps means frames per second, which is basically a more popular term alternative to pictures per second
no your brain can not show a limited amount of frames per second its just how much you can process
Eyes sees at 12 to 24 images per seconds if I remember correctly, that's why you can see some "jumps" in 12fps videos or animations, but you can't above 24fps if you saw faster you would
@@noamsoleil2610bruh what. a. we do not see in frames, and b. that is the stupidest shit ive ever heard. 24 fps has no fucking relevancy. all 24fps is, is the framerate movies are published at. in general, our eyes process infinite images.
@@noamsoleil2610eyes see way more ethan 12-24 fps, how you explain 60-360hz monitors?
I Used to be a dumbass in videography because younger me think a 2tb hardrive will be enough for all my client's need
Where's the thirty FPS? Damn it!!!!!
Everytime the increase of fps slows the video more..
yes its to show that the higher refresh rate the more it can be slowed without looking stuttery
@@triickshott yeah..you're right..
But more fps not directly make your video slower!
@@parthsharma1640 your original comment didnt explain very well..
@@svensantesson2020 you are right!
Humans see at like 12 to 24 images per seconds if I remember correctly, and fps mean the number of frames per second, if you somehow record at 1000fps it won't be automatically slower, there will just be 1000 frames in 1 second instead of 30 or 60 but by making so that you see 30 of the 1000 frames each seconds it will be slowed down and you will see the video in slow motion, also to human eyes anything above 30 to 60 fps (if isn't slowed down) feels the same as eyes sees slower
1000 fps is what I see when I walk into Costco
240fps - screen updated every 0.0041666666666s
480fps - screen updated every 0.0020833333333s
1000fps - screen updated every 0.001s
Nah, Hz
No thats not fps its hz
1000fps is how someone with the sharingan would perceive the world
Amazing lvl
I might beat this someday
Well nothing beats the good ol' 24 fps.
Yall misunderstood something. This clip is at respective fps but for comparison. They all calibrate to play at the same frame rate to compare. That being said higher fps has more frames in it so when it is set to play back at lower fps. It becomes slower .
Let say you want to compare between 60 and 120 fps.
Both this video then being compared and being set play at 30 fps.
Now because the amount of frames in a second it has. 60 fps would take 2 seconds to play all rendered 60 frames while 120 fps would take double the amount of that time just to play all 120 of the rendered frames when you play back the video at 30 fps by displaying all the 120 rendered frames without skipping. Hence why higher fps seems slower and lower fps has faster playback.
This video is about previewing all the rendered frames at fixed fps for all videos being rendered at different fps.
I think this is just same video with different slow mo speed
@@johnchamp67 that's the point... If you would slow down a 30 fps video as much as the top video here then it would be laggy af. But with 1000 fps it's totally smooth
Thanks! 😩
1000fps 2000w
"Me happy Getting 1 FPS in Cod"💀
You ought to make each of them last equally long so you can see the step difference between the FPS amounts.
Unless it wasn’t your point to show the difference between amount of detailed snapshots.
youtube plays at a set fps, much less than even 240
@@cruze_the I know.
But TH-cam didn’t render these videos side by side, he did that in an editor.
He could f.e. Make the 1000fps drops played at 60hz and the others played at respectively lower hz.
~15hz for the 240fps.
That would make them last as long as each other, but you can see the difference in details caught per second respective to their hz side by side.
@ that's not the point of the video, he's showing off how high the fps of his camera is
@@cruze_the 🤦♂️
Ok then, have a nice day, thick skull.
@this is not video games fps, this is camera fps, they're not used to record a super smooth video, they're used to record slowmo vids
Now I need a 1000hz monitor so I can watch it at normal speeds
Don't be dumb it's not 1000fps for screen it's for slow motion
Just slow :p
Cringe
@@TheKingMateo22 huh? What so cringe about his comment?
It’s supposed to be a slow motion frame rate comparison for filmmakers that’s the point
@@abnerurgelles5734 the :p
thats the point.
me casually playing minecraft at 1000
Jerks asking animators to make a 120 fps animation:
Why can’t animators make 120 fps animation is it too hard
@@dinosharttt 120fps animation would take a lot of time to render
Me watching in my 60hz screen: I see 🍷🗿
Frames per second . Humans see at 60 fps . It's how many pics flash per second . The more the smoother it will look . Try changing from 120 fps to 90 to 60 to 30 on your camera to see difference
people dont see in frames
tell me you have no idea what your saying without telling me you have no idea what your saying
@@brandon..1 he managed to do it successfully..
By the way, humans see at like 12 to 24 images per seconds if I remember correctly, and fps mean the number of frames per second, if you somehow record at 1000fps it won't be automatically slower, there will just be 1000 frames in 1 second instead of 30 or 60 but by making so that you see 30 of the 1000 frames each seconds it will be slowed down and you will see the video in slow motion, also to human eyes anything above 30 to 60 fps (if isn't slowed down) feels the same as eyes sees slower
@@noamsoleil2610 ah yes, the human eyes cannot see more than 60 fps, dumbest thing i’ve ever heard….
@@attaboydanny Technically frames are like images.. so we can actually say that humans sees in frames
I CANT KEEP SEEING THESE VIDEOS MY IPOS CANT HANDLE IT
I dont see a diffrence after 60 fps
It’s because your hertz don’t go any higher
@@BreathOfDust😂no, TH-cam is max at 60
They are all 60/30fps, i dont know, but the high number is what it would look like if it had been shot on that fps.
@@svensantesson2020 I didn’t know if he was just talking about the video… you don’t either.
Makes sense. I always knew my 10 years old gaming pc is running at 1000fps. It move just slow just like in this video.
Lol y’all don’t get what FPS means
My phone: best i can do is 7 fps
my mobile is 30fps
My pc - i wil show you this in 10 fps 💀
Bro turned particals up
Fun fact our eyes can only see 30 to 60 fps so you would have the same experience playing on 60 fps
So smooth
Zack Synder is edging to this
Can't wait for gaming to hit 1000 FPS
I never saw a difference of fps above 60.. but the slowmotion is amazing.. I remeber back when the Warp program about that super slow motion camera was a thing, and we where able for the first time to watch scenes hundreds of times slower. Maybe in a few years it will be accessible to most to have a 500 to 1000fps camera like we can have smartphones now that allow most to use something only the rich could before.
The ending is never true, solos is always a loss 😢
Wow i never knew that 1000 fps was so detailed
Smooooooth
i thought this was a whole vid turns out i watched this loop like 5 times
you can see infinity fps in real life
The power of fps
Meanwhile me in bgmi 20 -30 fps 😅
People don't know the pain we go through with low fos
∞ frames per second : reality
We can jump to the moon but our eyeballs just on 0.000001fps
👀
It's Amazing The Lower The Fps The Slower The Image/Footage/recording
240 is for surprise, 480 fps is a mix of both worlds and 1000fps is just an elegant spray
If you ever feel useless, remember, this video was taken in 30 FPS.
Bruh my iPhone says it records in 240 fps in slow motion but the 1000 fps video looks exactly like my iPhone recording in 240 fps
Fun fact: the framerate of your vision is generally around 60-90 fps, but can sometimes get up to 500 fps. So if somebody says that a 1,000 frame 1 second animations looks better than a 500 frame one second animation, they are probly lying.
For a good example if the top one was a animation you would have to draw 1000 pictures to make a second
I got confused too for a moment but them mean camera fps for slow motion footage.
Thank you for draining my battery 😁
Who else watched this video on repeat multiple times 😅
and that's how kids i'm still stuck in this loop
Me who sees no difference between 240 and 1000: 💀
there isn't actually a difference youtube cant play videos over 60, the higher fps here is just to be able to slow it down
Theres alot of difference ur blind?
@@nicholasjohansson1280if you slow it down you can see more frames
You are viewing all the videos at 60fps. Its nor about smoothness, it's about the diference in "the time resolution". If you capture a second ina 120fps camera and playback at the natural 60. You will get a footage twice as slow as real life. More FPS means you can get even finer details in that time dimension. And as such, can slow down by a bigger factor.
This is about capture speed. Not playback speed
Me: struggling my mobile device to even reach 60fps
Me seeing 1000 fps on my 60 fps phone💀💀💀
This is satisfaing my nervs
what if the more fps the more memory fills our brain 😳
who else thought it was a cricket ball getting pitched on the surface of pitch?
Slow-motion vs fast motion 😂
I wish I could afford 1,000 fps lol
💀640x480 low cs 1.6 :
Me watching with 60fps screen:🧐
I was confused y the bigger is slow, until some1 said the vid is slowed on it
Same clip in slow motion 😂🎉
Wouldn't it make more sense to show them at the same slow speed to admire the difference?
youtube shorts only allow for 30 or 60 so no it wouldn’t
Our eyes can't catch much difference 😅.If a game is played in 1000 fps playing in 60 fps makes you feel lag 😅😅
you see whatever your screen refresh rate is
I have a 60hz screen, I just won't be able to unfold these fps
High frames = potential to slow down to greater levels without degradation in flow
Low frames = cannot be slowed down without degradation in flow
Those scenes are depicting what limits those footages captured at different frame rates can be slowed down to without degradation in viewing quality
FPS ❌. slow motion ☑️
When that happens in a game i lag
me watching this in 240p
Excellent example
🔥🔥🔥
You know I'm not going to lie 240fps is just crazy in itself but a thousand I think it's just Overkill
More fps doesnt equal slower, it just means that you can slow it down more without it looking really choppy, technically all of them could've been filmed with the 1000fps camera and then not slowed down so much
Me watching it in 144p: wooooow 👁️👄👁️
Now do all of the vids at same speed