Some good criticisms, but Christianity has the same problem and the resurrection of Jesus has to be taken on faith. Also Jesus failed to accomplish anything in his life time, so it is pushed off to a second coming that failed to manifest.
Not really, as the Resurrection is a product of history. Unless you change beliefs of eyewitness testimony into faith then all historical events up to the point of video camera use (and even then) must be taken on faith.
@@CaveToTheCrossApologetics eye witness testimony is not that reliable. They remember things incorrectly and one can not be sure if they are saying the truth. The gospels are not eye witnesses.
Some good criticisms, but Christianity has the same problem and the resurrection of Jesus has to be taken on faith. Also Jesus failed to accomplish anything in his life time, so it is pushed off to a second coming that failed to manifest.
Not really, as the Resurrection is a product of history. Unless you change beliefs of eyewitness testimony into faith then all historical events up to the point of video camera use (and even then) must be taken on faith.
@@CaveToTheCrossApologetics eye witness testimony is not that reliable. They remember things incorrectly and one can not be sure if they are saying the truth. The gospels are not eye witnesses.
@@CaveToTheCrossApologetics The gospels are not eye witnesses and eye witness memories of events are notoriously bad.