Yes but not intirely because we sometimes replace the waltzy sequence, knowing that the dance is a bit early for that , by allemande turns. Sometimes we even use a complete poussette as a third alternative.
Its possilbe to dance this duple minor without cast off and in the last 8 bars with a poussette for one and a half (anti-clockwise)? What say the original text from 1820?
I did not know this waltz. Thank you for sharing it. Always happy to learn a new dance.
How elegant!
Thank you James!
The clip shows the Interpretation from A.Simons (1971) too.
Yes but not intirely because we sometimes replace the waltzy sequence, knowing that the dance is a bit early for that , by allemande turns. Sometimes we even use a complete poussette as a third alternative.
@@chestnutcecilelaye4257 Thanks for answer. I like the channel of George Williams th-cam.com/video/CagFxhUlrjw/w-d-xo.html
Its possilbe to dance this duple minor without cast off and in the last 8 bars with a poussette for one and a half (anti-clockwise)? What say the original text from 1820?
It is possible indeed and this is what dancers would have done at he time. Thanks for watching
@@chestnutcecilelaye4257 What are the original words for the choreography of the print of 1820?
@@thomaskurth8335 poussette
@@chestnutcecilelaye4257 Thanks
Shouldn’t they all be wearing gloves? Bare hand touching was taboo
it is not a strict reconstruction but a dance by dancers of the 21rst century performed as well of possible .