How to Use ChatGPT4o as Your Stock Analyst ($NVDA, $GOOG)

แชร์
ฝัง
  • เผยแพร่เมื่อ 15 พ.ย. 2024

ความคิดเห็น • 97

  • @yapyh2872
    @yapyh2872 2 หลายเดือนก่อน +2

    Hi, i really like your information. Thank you. I'm totally new to stock assessment but i did try it out and find out from gpt 4o that there are also a few type of DCF analysis such as a Risk-adjusted Cash Flows, Unlevered Free Cash Flow, Detailed Multi-stage DCF Model and etc. Which would you recommend to use and which is more accurate?

    • @finxter
      @finxter  หลายเดือนก่อน

      I like simple unlevered FCF model. It's not rocket science and people overcomplicate it. I'd rather be roughly right than precisely wrong. ;)

  • @tasadem20
    @tasadem20 5 หลายเดือนก่อน +4

    Great way of using technology. Thank you for sharing.

    • @finxter
      @finxter  5 หลายเดือนก่อน

      Thanks, appreciate it!

  • @surelywoo
    @surelywoo 19 วันที่ผ่านมา

    Great presentation. I didn't know it could do this.

    • @finxter
      @finxter  16 วันที่ผ่านมา

      Thanks man 💪

  • @danesaberlinesa
    @danesaberlinesa 5 หลายเดือนก่อน

    Great video mate... ive been thinking for a while about how to use the new GPT versions to help me and assist with stock analysis. Its great to help you spot some insights about the stock that we, as amateur investors, otherwise might overlook... and its a way of keep learning and sharpening our stock analysis skills.
    Thanks for sharing

    • @finxter
      @finxter  5 หลายเดือนก่อน

      Thanks, great PoV. Agree 100%!

  • @DividendDynamicsYT
    @DividendDynamicsYT 5 หลายเดือนก่อน +3

    I made a video where I compare the AI with a manual analysis. Great video!

    • @finxter
      @finxter  5 หลายเดือนก่อน +3

      You could track AI and your prediction accuracy over time. Could be interesting.

  • @techwithlaki8917
    @techwithlaki8917 4 หลายเดือนก่อน +2

    Thanks for sharing

  • @SantezFlatline
    @SantezFlatline 3 หลายเดือนก่อน

    Thanks for the video. I used the same version of the gpt chat 4o, the same request and the same screen and got different output results. I can’t understand why, you have more information about company in your answer, I have less text in my answer.

    • @finxter
      @finxter  3 หลายเดือนก่อน

      Yeah, they always update the model (even within a "macro" version such as 4o). Also it's non-deterministic output...

  • @rafref
    @rafref 4 หลายเดือนก่อน

    Thanks for sharing, have a nice dayy

    • @finxter
      @finxter  4 หลายเดือนก่อน

      You too :)

  • @larsthonissen8295
    @larsthonissen8295 5 หลายเดือนก่อน

    Nice Video! I do think you can also just tell GPT to check the URL. You don't have to feed it a screenshot.

    • @finxter
      @finxter  5 หลายเดือนก่อน

      Not anymore since the recent copyright lawsuits. At least in Germany - feel free to confirm if it can read Yahoo stock information in your country.

  • @Soulastro12
    @Soulastro12 3 หลายเดือนก่อน

    can you do AMC?

    • @finxter
      @finxter  3 หลายเดือนก่อน

      Maybe in the future. Thanks for your interest!

  • @ASHAH925
    @ASHAH925 3 หลายเดือนก่อน

    How do you use chat gpt for options trading?

    • @finxter
      @finxter  3 หลายเดือนก่อน

      Not a big fan of options "trading". Buying long-term Leaps maybe - but trading sounds like a loser's game. Better buy stock (with theoretically infinite holding period and no time decay).

  • @egorge00
    @egorge00 5 หลายเดือนก่อน

    Great video, thanks ! Any means to automate this through a number of companies ? Such as: asking to make the same analysis with all the nasdaq 100 companies and get a recap tab ?

    • @finxter
      @finxter  5 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

      Definitely! Simply use the OpenAI API for raw intelligence, and feed it the financial statements via an API (e.g., Yahoo Finance API). Great idea. I sense a million-dollar business idea!

    • @rc-y
      @rc-y 5 หลายเดือนก่อน

      @@finxter😂

  • @ahmadhuseynli2073
    @ahmadhuseynli2073 5 หลายเดือนก่อน

    Can we trust it for our own investments ?

    • @finxter
      @finxter  5 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

      Don't trust. Verify. ;)

  • @Terencethys
    @Terencethys 4 หลายเดือนก่อน

    is the current GPT3.5 VERSION able to assist in stock analyst and current buy levels based on your illustration?

    • @finxter
      @finxter  4 หลายเดือนก่อน

      No. ChatGPT-4o is a 10x improvement because of its integration of deep RAG functionality in my opinion.

    • @Terencethys
      @Terencethys 4 หลายเดือนก่อน

      @@finxter does it have real time data access to investment resources to assist in calculating fundamental strong companies?
      how should I fully utilise?

    • @Terencethys
      @Terencethys 4 หลายเดือนก่อน

      does Chat GPT-4o has its own biases when doing our information research and to do our due diligence?

  • @geno755
    @geno755 4 หลายเดือนก่อน

    Question: how current is the data when querying chatgpt? Isnt there a delay?

    • @finxter
      @finxter  4 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

      They use finance web API (seemingly) so pretty current in most cases. But it's always good practice to cross-check, especially if you base some investment decisions on it.

    • @Barabus-yx2cn
      @Barabus-yx2cn 4 หลายเดือนก่อน

      It's outdated sh!t.

  • @icholakov
    @icholakov 3 หลายเดือนก่อน +2

    The fundamental analysis here is straightforward but not very practical. It has been performed for decades without the help of AI. In fact you are not using AI for any insights but merely for a more natural language interaction with fundamental data. You are valuing a stock at a point in time which in by itself cannot be used for investment decisions. For example, if you conclude a stock is significantly undervalued, you cannot invest in it because it can stay undervalued for the next 10 years. Similarly when a stock is overvalued it does now mean its stock price will slow down.

    • @finxter
      @finxter  3 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

      Yeah sure, it's just a tool that simplifies valuation work. The future will bring down the barriers of company valuation so retail investors will keep pushing into the industry - many will outperform so-called "professionals".

  • @sedul2006
    @sedul2006 5 หลายเดือนก่อน

    Is there a way to encapsulate the prompt/automate the prompt? Train a chatbot to run the same analysis on the same input?

    • @finxter
      @finxter  5 หลายเดือนก่อน

      Yes, sure. One could use fine-tuning: blog.finxter.com/openai-fine-tuning/

  • @kaytoonen6266
    @kaytoonen6266 5 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

    Lol it just did the annually estimated growth in the last month around 40% chat gpt was not bullish enough haha

    • @finxter
      @finxter  5 หลายเดือนก่อน

      Haha, yeah. Hindsight is really useful for financial analysis. Even we have an advantage against AI if we have the benefit of hindsight. ;)

  • @pavanghai
    @pavanghai 5 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

    Which tool are you using to capture full screen of yahoo site?

    • @finxter
      @finxter  5 หลายเดือนก่อน +6

      Haha, just open it with Firefox, right-click to open the context menu, select "Take Screenshot". No need to install any external screenshot tool.

    • @MyBrianBailey
      @MyBrianBailey 5 หลายเดือนก่อน

      you can get snipping tool for free on PC

    • @maxlewisconsultantspteltd7187
      @maxlewisconsultantspteltd7187 4 หลายเดือนก่อน

      @@MyBrianBailey After snipping, how do we paste onto the chat gpt4 ? can someone help?

  • @dimashlapakovsky3779
    @dimashlapakovsky3779 4 หลายเดือนก่อน +4

    Good use of AI BUT you inputs are wrong that’s why your numbers are off. You can’t just pull those figures off Yahoo finance and call it a day. DCF should be based on unlevered after tax cash flows.

    • @finxter
      @finxter  4 หลายเดือนก่อน

      Thoughtful comment. Just a quick note - there are many ways of running DCF. I agree that numbers should be chosen carefully but it's generally a good appraoch of running various types of analyses, even more heuristic "napkin math" types. If it was all about precise accounting, accountants and math PhDs would be the richest people on the planet.
      Everybody needs to find their individual strengths in investing, all input numbers are wrong (even yours in your DCF analysis), and it's not the best approach to use "unlevered after tax cash flows" for every company in every situation. I'd argue that using net income for high-growth companies is often more accurate than FCFs due to the investments in growth infrastructure (e.g., GPUs).

  • @bonanzatime
    @bonanzatime 5 หลายเดือนก่อน +13

    What do you mean by, '15% discount rate'? What are you talking about?🙁

    • @finxter
      @finxter  5 หลายเดือนก่อน +17

      "The discount rate is the interest rate used to calculate the present value of future cash flows from a project or investment."
      I asked ChatGPT to explain like I'm five:
      Imagine you have a lemonade stand, and you want to know how much it's worth today based on how much money it will make in the future. The "discount rate of 15%" is like saying future money is worth 15% less each year. We use this number to figure out how much all the money you'll make in the future is worth right now. It's like using a special rule to say, "I’d rather have money now than later, so future money isn't worth as much."
      Because I like money now more than money in the future (=future cash flows), I reduce the value of future cash flows by 15% each year. This is a very conservative approach.

    • @bonanzatime
      @bonanzatime 5 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

      @@finxter Ok,🤔 it sounds like you/it is describing inflation without using the word inflation. Is that correct?

    • @tmiris3006
      @tmiris3006 5 หลายเดือนก่อน +9

      @@bonanzatimehes not describing inflation.
      ”Disccount rate” is a term to discribe the value of future earnings. Think about it like this: if i told you i will give you 1 thousand dollars ten years from now, what is the value of that right now? Well it isnt the full one thousand, because its not as valuable to you if you dont have it right now. So its worth ”some percentage” of that one thousand. That percentage is the discount rate.

    • @lky88lim38
      @lky88lim38 5 หลายเดือนก่อน +3

      15% discount…. Is this realistic?
      I wonder which stock is not considered overpriced by this yardstick? 😅

    • @serknight029
      @serknight029 5 หลายเดือนก่อน

      ​@@lky88lim38it's not. With current interest rates and historical equity risk premium a normal wacc's range is between 7 and 9%

  • @loureiro7342
    @loureiro7342 5 หลายเดือนก่อน

    does microsoft ai (copilot) does the same?

    • @finxter
      @finxter  5 หลายเดือนก่อน

      They're probably using ChatGPT internally so yes. :)

  • @michaelherrlich1536
    @michaelherrlich1536 4 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

    The calculation of the implicit growth rate is not so useful as you add your 15 percent in the calculation. As the implicit growth rate is 26 percent and you want it to compound by 15 percent, the earnings growth must be pretty low compared to it's currently high price.

    • @finxter
      @finxter  4 หลายเดือนก่อน

      Thanks. Would you be able to clarify this please? Not sure I get what you're saying and before I reply I want to make sure I do.
      We need to differentiate the growth rate of the business itself and the return of investment when investing in the stock.
      That's why we first estimate the growth of the business to get its intrinsic value. By adjusting the discount rate we can get our personal ROI from investing in the stock when our business growth assumptions are correct.

  • @niknik1604
    @niknik1604 5 หลายเดือนก่อน +2

    Can someone take this prediction serious ?

    • @finxter
      @finxter  5 หลายเดือนก่อน +10

      No, you shouldn't blindly trust any output. But you can take it more serious if you put in your own numbers and assumptions. This is just a tool, not a crystal ball.

  • @philippeturco4670
    @philippeturco4670 5 หลายเดือนก่อน

    LUCY IS THE NEW MEME STOCK🎉🎉🎉🎉🎉🎉

    • @finxter
      @finxter  5 หลายเดือนก่อน

      Don't know this. Don't buy meme stocks.

    • @zRoGuee
      @zRoGuee 5 หลายเดือนก่อน

      Seems you were correct lol how did you know it would be? Please share your sources :)

  • @michaelherrlich1536
    @michaelherrlich1536 4 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

    Warren Buffet is not doing any DCF. Read the books. Buffet takes some main variables, thinks about moat, management and the future, and then buys great companies to hold them. Great moment to buy when they're under distress. Your video is nice to show what chat gbt can do, but don't bring Warren Buffet here as a reference

    • @finxter
      @finxter  4 หลายเดือนก่อน

      Strong disagree. Warren Buffett has said in multiple shareholder meetings that DCF is the only way to value a business. He's using "owner's earnings" instead of "free cash flow" or "net income". He says that he's doing a mini DCF in his head and buys companies only if they're at a significant discount to "intrinsic value". He defines intrinsic value as all the cash a business makes from here to judgement day, discounted into the present, which is exactly the definition of DCF.

  • @diebestenaktien2323
    @diebestenaktien2323 5 หลายเดือนก่อน +3

    If Nvidia grew 42% pa, the profit in 10 years would be 1 Trillion……how probable is this? Zero!

    • @finxter
      @finxter  5 หลายเดือนก่อน +7

      Why shouldn't this be possible? People 10y ago believed Apple or Microsoft's profits and marketcap is impossible. There's no physical law that prevents companies from earning $1,000 billion in a given year. In fact, I believe it's highly likely given the debasement of USD and the winner-takes all economics in today's world.

    • @Huelosoneroen
      @Huelosoneroen 5 หลายเดือนก่อน

      Jo, die beiden Stonks haben halt in den letzten 10 Jahren 28% bzw. 25% p.a. hingelegt

    • @aosaller
      @aosaller 5 หลายเดือนก่อน +2

      ​@finxter I'll tell you why. Because to have profits that high, even with current high margins it would need to have revenues north of 2 trillion. And the chip business is highly cyclical. Jensen himself said there's a total global AI Capex budget of 1T, and that is spanning multiple years, of which nvda could maybe get 500bn. If you look at consensus estimates, you are getting 140-150bn estimates annually for the next 5 years, so nowhere near your assumed amount. Plugging a bunch of figures into chatgpt and having it spit out a number that you like doesn't mean one's analysis has any merit. Thorough fundamental research is what's key, and ai is just a tool.

  • @darrenting
    @darrenting 4 หลายเดือนก่อน

    Isn’t the 2024 growth rate is well over 100%? 2025 will be somewhere around 60%

    • @finxter
      @finxter  4 หลายเดือนก่อน

      Can you elaborate? NVidia revenue growth rate over 100%? I doubt it. I'd say roughly 50% if you forced me to guess...

  • @averagescav1947
    @averagescav1947 5 หลายเดือนก่อน

    no front
    you are way too bullish
    look at the following
    interest rate hikes in the past
    and cisco 2000 and today with nvidia
    🙂
    im going to spare you time
    it is the same as cisco in 2000

    • @finxter
      @finxter  5 หลายเดือนก่อน

      So? Not sure we should reason by analogy here using a single data point as analogous scenario. You can always overlay technical charts and conclude anything from it. There is little information gain approaching a qualitative analysis from a TA PoV.

  • @jonnyd95
    @jonnyd95 5 หลายเดือนก่อน

    Schönes English 👍

    • @finxter
      @finxter  5 หลายเดือนก่อน

      Haha, do I sense sarcasm?

  • @ppp123ppp
    @ppp123ppp 4 หลายเดือนก่อน

    Overvalued as f#uck. Just like Tesla. Lets see both stock performances in 10 years.

    • @ppp123ppp
      @ppp123ppp 4 หลายเดือนก่อน

      I think both of them will be flat or lower in 10 years

    • @finxter
      @finxter  4 หลายเดือนก่อน

      Thanks for the perspective. I don't think so at all. No way flat or down in 10y. But that's what makes it interesting!

    • @ppp123ppp
      @ppp123ppp 4 หลายเดือนก่อน

      @@finxter That´s the point. Everybody think there´s no way that could happen. The market punishes consensus

  • @dumaoctavian8523
    @dumaoctavian8523 5 หลายเดือนก่อน +2

    Be carefull, you are way too bullish

    • @finxter
      @finxter  5 หลายเดือนก่อน +5

      You think? I'm not sure - it is a revolution. Scaling intelligent labor is not a toy and it won't go away. It's like the industrial revolution on steroids. I think most people are just too stuck in their ways that they underestimate the disruptive power that comes with AI.

    • @bar590
      @bar590 4 หลายเดือนก่อน

      @@finxter agreed!

  • @Sujit_Kulkarni
    @Sujit_Kulkarni 5 หลายเดือนก่อน +2

    Bullshit

    • @timmark4190
      @timmark4190 5 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

      Why.

    • @Sujit_Kulkarni
      @Sujit_Kulkarni 5 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

      You don't need gpt to do dcf for you. There are tools already that can do it easily within mins and investing isn't that simple else everyone who is Powerful with money and brains would have done it without you and I knowing about it

    • @finxter
      @finxter  5 หลายเดือนก่อน +17

      This is about the tooling for investment analysis. Go ahead and mention some tools that are better for DCA than an intelligent, data-aware, financial analyst that you can iterate with to include or revise your own expectation for a certain company. It is my view that this foundational model is the best tool out there to help you with financial analysis. Certainly better than asking your "trusted banker" who's less intelligent, less skilled, and less objective than ChatGPT-4o.

    • @verngall
      @verngall 5 หลายเดือนก่อน +10

      @@Sujit_Kulkarni If you don't like the content just leave. no need to hate on the author ->. please. Or create your own videos.

    • @Mark-bb4ks
      @Mark-bb4ks 5 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

      Looks like it wasn’t bullshit. Nvidia sky rocketed

  • @Barabus-yx2cn
    @Barabus-yx2cn 4 หลายเดือนก่อน

    Use Perplexity. Far superior to this garbage.

    • @finxter
      @finxter  4 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

      Not really. Perplexity is great but it uses inferior models and RAG compared to ChatGPT-4o. Just check out any model comparison benchmark online. Not sure why you call ChatGPT-4o garbage?