Very tired of roaring dinosaurs. No solitary predator makes a big deal about making a kill the ones that did used to do that lose their kills two other animals and they starve and die out so the behavior doesn't perpetuate. In the real world predators don't provide meals for others at the expense of itself.
they're brothers and he woke the other up nicer than my sister wakes me up(she drags me far enough out of my bed so I fall onto the floor flat on my face)
And just like how basically anybody could overpower a seagull, the seagull here still wins 😅 (granted a Quetz is abit more than a seagull, but your point stands lol)
Yep. I prefer Hank and his kind more than Rexy now. I can't get enough of this design. If you told me as a 10 year old that's how t rex might have looked I would not have believed anything. Don't get me wrong though. Rexy is still a cult classic.
Rexy looked so good in JP, she was in her prime, they totally ruined her design in JW, I get that she was supposed to look older but idc it was still an ugly design, unecessarily shrink wrapped.
@@ryomahoffman6803well animals get older and won’t look the same. That what they are going for when designing her. Which make sense from the timeline between the first movie and the world movie.
When u start to become a paleontology nerd u think ur going to learn about dinosaurs that r way cooler than T. rex, and while there are definitely some unknown and underrated dinosaurs, the more u learn about T.rex the more u learn that it deserves the praise that it has, they were truly kings.
That depends if Prehistoric Planet won't limit itself to the Maastrichtian Age of the Late Cretaceous. By this age, Spinosaurus has long since died out
Dude this is 10,000x scarier than the 90s shrinkwrapped roaring T-Rex everyone is so attached to. Imagine walking through the forest and something that big is just... just... THERE. And you didn't hear it approach you. And there's multiple of them, and the only sound they make is a deep rumbling noise that sounds like a growling stomach. That's terrifying.
You're having selective memory. First rex scene she breaks out and isn't hunting. Hence the noise and screaming. Bit further down the line she sneaks up on gallis and takes one down. And at the end another sneak attack when she saves the humans. You just think you're clever making this comment but you couldn't be more wrong
@@minutemansam1214 I worked out a lot in my younger days and I never had much fat on my body, nor did any of my friends at the gym. Some lifters did get a bit plump, but even they weren't morbidly obese. There also isn't a single large extant terrestrial predator that is plump like that. Even bears, which have a high degree of body fat, don't look like that. You can still see muscles rippling under the skin and fur when they walk or run. I seriously doubt that it was any different in the case of the T. Rex. This iteration of the King of the Dinosaurs to me just looks.... wrong, somehow.
i like that in the part where the T. rex is hunting the Edmontosaurus, I like that Edmontosaurus isn't being shown as a weak defenseless creature, and the T. rexes had to work together in order to take that giant animal down.
For everyone that ignores the simple fact that T. Rex is an animal and not a monster or a videogame character, it could been scared by the two quetzals, animals avoid injury when possible, infection is a real risk, there is also the intimidation factor, vultures can drive lions off carcasses when in big enough numbers, i hope this clear the mind of some people out there.
I dont believe vultures can drive off lions from their kill, let alone a male lion. but I can see them driving of cheetahs. Although the quetzals appears bigger than the trex, its light weight compared to t-rex and I cannot imagine this would have happened in real. No bird would risk its ability to fly.
@@chiragdarji1571 that is no bird, that's a fucking 5 meter tall reptile, and also vultures can do that, even male lions, hyenas do that too, now there is no way a much heavier and powerful animal like a lion would give up their food to a much weaker hyena, right? But that's what happen, hyenas scare away lions from carcasses because it is not worth for the lions to risk getting injured even if they can kill every hyena, they would die of infection or would be too weak to hunt
Great blue herons have long beaks and are tall birds, but that doesn't stop bald eagles from frequently hunting them. Bald eagles will also land in herons nests and eat the eggs right in front of the screaming parents, and looks at them as much as if to say; try something. I dare you. There are videos of it right here on TH-cam. It then leaves after eating it's fill. There's no way even very large pterodactyl's were going to drive off the King of the Dinosaurs.
@@chiragdarji1571well it have happen multiple time in the wild. You don’t believe it cause it doesn’t make sense to you. But nature doesn’t have to make sense for you to understand. It happen.
@@classicgalactica5879I know it hard for you to understand but it nature. It happen everytime. Different between the bird you mentioned and to a quetzal is that quetzal is taller than a T. rex and have a large beak that can injure an inexperienced animal. The difference is that the T. rex can’t fly, so comparing a quetzal and a T. rex to an eagles and other small bird isn’t a good comparison. Rex don’t hunt quetzal cause it risky, same as risking hunting a bull triceratops. And there two of quetzal challenges a Rex. You are focusing on a single eagles hunting a single herons.
It's such a funny contrast seeing it open and close it's mouth It's like those clips of baboons and snakes yawning, first it's just a serene face and the next second massive fangs protude out of it
Yes the fuck I would if I had 6 inch long sharp teeth and the strongest bite force on the planet and the burger is also big enough to feed me for several weeks
@@adf286 said birds are as tall as you, you known nothing about them, you don't known you are heavier and stronger, and they have the equivalent of a sniper rifle as face, are you going to risk uneeded injury and potential infenction?
Idk if it’s just my screen but it seems like the nighttime hunt looks almost digitally enhanced to give us a better view in the dark, like they were going so much for a real life nature documentary feel they enhanced the lighting in post so the audience could see better.
I’m pleased seeying trex as an animal instead of a bloodthristy monster…. But look at it, i would love to see this organic tank smesh te sh*t out of another Big theropod y the next season ngl
Now I’m starting to like the Prehistoric Planet planet tyrannosaurus I also do like when it opens his mouth you do see its teeth which is a good thing even though that I still disagree with the lips and that’s fine if you can agree or disagree with me or at least it has teeth when it opens unlike a most art depiction’s sometimes when they open their mouths, you barely can’t even see their teeth which I don’t like
You can disagree with the lips but it's a fact they had them. Lips are the ancestral condition of all tetrapods. You may not like it because it's not 'cool', but this is a documentary, not a monster movie. These animals are made to be as accurate to the science as possible, not indulge in monster movie fantasies.
@@minutemansam1214 actually at this point, I don’t care if it have them or not but there are other scientist out there that still think that he did not have lips like Dr. Thomas car and Tracy Ford
Idk why I'm having mixed thoughts for this design. One shot it's the coolest looking, realistic Rex, the other shot it looks like a huge, fat blob. Maybe it's just the skin patterns. but I do prefer the Tarbosaurus design more.
I mentioned this on another thread. But I’m really, *really* getting sick of the subversive narrative trend in extinct animal fandom. Let me get this out of the way first. Do I have issues with the Quetz VS Rex scene? No, absolutely not, I think it’s a great scene and it’s very fitting in a nature documentary, and it’s refreshing to see: 1. Another animal that’s not a Trike or Anky successfully fending off a T. rex. 2. A powerful apex predator like the T. rex showing a very reasonable sense of self-preservation. What I *do* have a problem with is the attitude surrounding it. Armchair online paleontologists seem to *really like* doubling down on the subversive narrative that is this weird hipster mentality of “oh, the thing the mainstream media used to tell as the norm is COMPLETELY DIFFERENT!”. Thus, you get all these depictions of hadrosaurs harnessing this so-called “herbivore power”, demonstrated with them being a violent and unstoppable juggernaut. Or you know, ceratopsids happily feasting on a mutilated carcass (usually that of a carnivorous theropod for extra subversive points!) just to show that sometimes herbivores also eat meat for extra supplements? This is to name a few notable examples. How many times have you seen art of dromaeosaurs with exaggerated forms of plumage in a gruesome scene where it disembowel and eat their prey alive? How many times have *Yutyrannus* been set as an example just to deliver the “see?! Feathers can be scary!” What is this weird obsession to monster-ify dinosaurs while also trying to subvert the pop-culture norm? What’s wrong with them just being animals and not a “totally scary and savage” animal? I swear, I’ve seen people trying to shoehorn arguments that the PP *Velociraptor* is an example of how “scientifically accurate animals can be scary” and I’m like… What? At no point in the documentary that the *Velociraptor* is attempted to be depicted as a savage, terrifying beast. It looks like a regular desert animal that does desert animal things. You know what’s funny? This is very similar to the awesomebro mindset, just from the opposite side of the spectrum in terms of paleontological accuracy. Which is ironic since apparently awesomebros are such a dreaded boogeyman in the paleosphere. And now, azhdarchids are starting to get the same treatment.
If you look at the average male human skeleton, the thought of men being chased off by geese would also seem ridiculous. Yet many choose to run from an animal whose neck we could *easily* break because it's just not worth it.
@@miyamiyasvideovault5838 that's bcz a lot of humans r privileged n don't need to hunt or fight for their food but i bet u anything humans from 3000yrs would rip the heads off of geese today
@@nightrider3889 Ok bro. Go explain that to a Bear/Lion who got their kill stolen by a wolverine/honey badger they could definitely clap if they tried 👍
There are many theories. For some reason, T. rex had comparatively small, yet very well developed arms. Their arms were actually strong enough to bench press 400 lbs. One theory says that they used their arms to assist in mating by holding onto females while the male mounted. Another theory says their arms are small because there's no need to have powerful arms when their bite is more than enough to do the job. One theory I like is that T. rex had small arms so they're less likely to be bitten off or injured during combat with other members of their species.
“Pads on its feet” would exist to absorb shock to the animal; not to make it more silent in the woods. A predator that large would still make a ton of noise snapping sticks and branches; not to mention stirring up small animals that would produce a cacophony of scared calls. This is dumb
False. A predator that large would be able to walk in silence. Elephants are about as massive as T. rex. If one walked up behind you you wouldn't hear it. Learn basic facts about reality.
It's quite simple, it is not a killing machine, it's a animal. Sure it has OP feats, but it's better to avoid any unnecessary injury for something so big that they wouldn't even eat as much compared to it, the it can come back later. Their beaks are literally longer that it's skull, loosing a eye here is totally a fatal possibility and could screw it up.
It was an animal, not a killing machine, they made it clear that a rex would fold these two up completely but it chose not to because it knows the risks, it could lose an eye and even the slightest of injuries could lead to infections
@EmpyreusAwakening Yeah, I don't think that T-Rex understood how infections work. Yes, you are right. T-Rex was an animal, not a killing machine. But I can't help but believe T-Rex was an aggressively territorial animal. T-Rex most likely laid claim to all or above all things in his or her territory, especially when it came to food, I would wager. I imagine a full-grown bull T-Rex wasn't going to back down to any other creature in his territory other than possibly a larger T-Rex. I still say he ain't letting no oversized cross between a pelican and a bat (or even two of them) chase him away from a meal. At the end of the day, if a T-Rex was hungry enough, it would throw caution to the wind.
@@FuzzyWuzzy75 Dude, what part of "animals avoid any unnecessary conflit to avoid unnecessary damage that can cause worse scenarios to them" u did not understand ? it is CLEAR animals know how infections works, not how they happen but that they appear when getting injured. And infections are a big problem. I think u don't realize how massive animals actually live, just because it has a big ass jaw doesn't mean it can beat anything else at it's path, a simple Triceratops is dangerous enough to put a end on a Trex. A fucking flying giraffe with a beak longer than the Trex head can clearly do something while fly above it, it can't even reach the bastard. And anyways, with such a big carcass like this, those flying reptiles aren't even going to eat half of it, it can just come back later and eat it in peace.
@dev4159 Thank you for your words of wisdom, Dr. Doolittle, I was half inclined to take them seriously but then thought Naah, why would I? "Simple triceratops?" You make the triceratops sound harmless, lol. I could see where even a large T-Rex would avoid a perfectly healthy bull triceratops or a female triceratops with offspring as being far more likely than a T-Rex avoiding confrontation with an over grown pelican/bat. The triceratops would pose a far greater risk than the pelican/bat in a fight. Your whole argument is flawed. Would not, the pelican/bat want to avoid a fight with a T-Rex for precisely the same reason? Would it not behoove the pelican/bat to let T-Rex get his fill first and then come back after he moved on? The risks to the pelican/bat would be far greater than to the T-Rex. The pelican/bat's beak did not have the tensile strength to do much damage to the skin of a T-Rex. The pelican/bat would have to be an absolute marksman with that beak to get a bull's eye shot on the T-Rex's eye all while attacking within easy striking distance of the most dangerous part of the T-Rex which is his jaws/teeth. In nature, the biggest, the strongest, and the baddest always eat first, the rest get the leftovers, if there are any. And that law of nature would have damned sure applied to a naturally territorial and hungry T-Rex. But nice try, Dr. Doolittle, go back to playing your Jurassic Park game and stop trying to pretend like you know something.
JP was a movie. Not exactly the avenue by which to seek reality. The 1949 movie "The sands of Iwo Jima?" If you want to know what happened there in 1945...don't count on this movie.
Fossil evidence, modern analogs, and some amount of educated speculation. Think of it, T. rex was huge, and recent studies put its top speed at about 15 mph, but its prey is faster. T. rex also lived in wetland forests that would've looked a lot like the Everglades of Florida, that means plenty of foliage that can be used as cover. T. rex also had an incredibly powerful bite that would allow it to end hunts quickly. There's really no other way a T. rex could hunt other than ambushing, and if T. rex had to have ambushed its prey, that means it also had to be very quiet when taking steps. Elephants have pads on their feet that make them practically silent when walking, and Elephants are similar in size to T. rex. It makes a lot of sense once you lay everything out like that.
Trying to saurus Rex has a bone crushing bite, and it is more intelligent than the Quetzalcoatl us. The quetzal would try to attack it, but then get broken bones out of it and the quetzal would not be able to touch the rex Rex.
"And it is more intelligent than the Quetzalcoatlus." Source please. Flying is a HUGE +. Birds for instance also have very small brains, but some of the most intelligent creatures on this planet like corvids are birds. Plus, any animal that flies has to have a decently developed brain.
As good as this show is, there is a flaw... at the end of the video, when 2 pterasors chase away a T-rex... well, to put likely: thats is simply not possible... you cant compare vultures chasing away hienas to a kill with pterasors chassing away a trex. Vultures are pound for pound nearly as large as a hiena, while pterasors arent nearly as large as a trex. Also because of their size, pterasor wings are paper thin, to reduce weight, to make it possible to fly... so a pterasor, for its size, it only weighs as little more then a human... while a trex clocks out at 7tones... also any injury to a pterasor could spell disaster and leave it unable to fly... so what would a trex bite would do to a pterasor? The answer: not gonna end up well for the pterasor... thats for sure... and the trex could inflict tremendous damage even without his signature bite force... one swipe from that tale and its game over for any pterasor... pterasors, as well as birds, are higly vulnerable to blunt force hits... their bones are hollow... and can witstand torsion (unlike mammal or reptile bones) but are verry vulnerable to blunt force trauma... (wich mammal and reptiles can shrug off)... in conclussion: there is no way a pterasor or two or even a dozen, could chase a trex from a kill... maybe the trex had eaten its full... but its higly probable it would guard the kill for future consumption... so, 2 pterasors would never be able to scare a trex from a kill... the risk of dieing is to great... thats like 2 hungry little puppies would try to take on a full grown bear guarding its kill... thats not gonna happen... still, this show is amaizing... by far the best dinosaur documentary since walking with series...
This is a very long-winded way of saying “I don’t fully understand how risk-averse predators are”. The _T. rex_ is faced with two tall animals that can peck its eyes out. It can either wait until they’ve had their fill (and they’re not conceivably eating the whole _Alamosaurus_ carcass), or risk losing an eye or two and probably dooming itself. It picks the former.
@@Cavan_ nah dude. i get what you're saying and it is usually true but there are levels tro this game too. this is like a tiger waiting for two storks feeding on his carcass (if they would eat meat of course) i would play out like this: t rex walks up and as soon as the q's see him, they're fucking gone for good
I think the same, but believe the trex didnt have the reasoning a human have, so in the rex eyes, is Just probably two tall flying creatures shouting n attacking him. I think is not about dominance or strength, is like he feels uncomfortable and leaves bc whatever, he can come back later. 🤷🏻♂️
GO DO YOUR RESEARCH YOU 2-DAY-OLD BABY A MASSIVE PREDATOR LIKE THAT WOULDN'T FIND ENOUGH FOOD TO SUSTAIN ITSELF BY JUST BEING A SCAVANGER IT HAS BINOCULAR VISION TIPICAL OF HUNTERS AND A IT IS RIDICULOUSLY SMART, THERE ARE MANY FOSSILS WITH T REX BITE MARKS OF ANIMALS THAT SURVIVED A T REX ATTACK AND IT SURPRISES ME I HAVE TO EXPLAIN THIS WHEN YOU COULD ACCTUALLY BOTHER TO DO YOUR RESEARCH INSTEAD OF TALKING FALSE INFORMATION BASED ON HOLLYWOOD GARBAGE
Why would a scavenger have the strongest bite force of any land carnivore in the history of the world? Scavengers tend to have teeth and jaws that are good for tearing flesh off of bone, only exception I can think of in the current day are hyenas. The T-Rex’s teeth and jaws and designed for crushing and penetration. Not to mention all the other evidence that backs up T-Rex being an apex predator
@@ricker4394 The Quetz's would lose a lot more than that if they end up getting caught in its jaws. A bite from a T-Rex could just decapitate them or crush any part of their body easily. T-Rexes could rip off Triceratop's heads which literally weighed twice as much as the Quetz on their own.
@@EGarrett01quetz also has the ability to get away alot easier without injury to itself. Although i do question how easy was it really for quetz to get up in the air like that
Staying away from danger was probably a big part of T. rexs life, they were enormous creatures and they lived in forests, a simple trip on a log could’ve kill one, they were probably pretty aware of what to stay away from
This is a documentary made by paleontologists not st upid animal battle made by kids. Paleontologists don't care which is stronger, it just prey and predator scene
Tyrannosaurs ate hadrosaurs often. We have fossil evidence of this. On average, Edmontosaurus was around 38 ft and 4-5 tons; half the mass of an average T. rex. The largest two specimens of Edmontosaurus in the world indicate a MAXIMUM length of around 48 ft with a weight of about 9 tons. So the even the very largest of them was still only about the same mass as a typical Tyrannosaurus and had literally none of the weapons. The idea of a 4-6 ton hadrosaur somehow fighting off a 7-9 ton T. rex is about as realistic as an 800 cow with no horns fighting off a 1000 lb brown bear. It didn’t happen. At least not often.
I find the idea of a 6 tonnes animal 'sneaking' through the underbrush of a dense forest to be ridiculous. They would crack branches and whatnot, and they probably also smelled pretty bad (no, 'staying down wind' in such conditions is also not going to do the trick). This is the fantasy of some office dweller who has never been in a wild forest.
Elephants weigh about six tons and can walk through a forest without making noise. An elephant can be ten feet behind you and you wouldn't know it was there. You seem to be the one out of touch with nature. T. rex is a predator. It needed to be able to move silently in order to hunt. Or do you not understand how hunting works?
Notice how the T.rexs didn’t fucking roar after making its kill, they just killed as quick as they could and went straight to eating
That's all Hollywood BS n not Realistic.
Accurate. Films these days want the dinosaur to look cool after its kill, so they fucking roar after a kill. It's like shouting after winning a fight.
@@Pumpkin_Sean yeah but like in reality that’s incredibly illogical cuz u’d just be bringing attention to urself lol, it’s just goofy😂
@@ryomahoffman6803 I know, right? 💀😂
Very tired of roaring dinosaurs. No solitary predator makes a big deal about making a kill the ones that did used to do that lose their kills two other animals and they starve and die out so the behavior doesn't perpetuate. In the real world predators don't provide meals for others at the expense of itself.
0:55 That one shot where the T-Rex wakes the other was golden. Not gonna lie.
"Oi, get up"
"Whaaaaaaaaat??"
"Be vewy vewy quiet, we're hunting hadwosauwus"
@@Paveway-chan wake up honey.
@@Paveway-chan
“Sweetie wake up, the dinner is moving!”
they're brothers and he woke the other up nicer than my sister wakes me up(she drags me far enough out of my bed so I fall onto the floor flat on my face)
@@Latenivenatrix_Mcmasterae Are they really brothers?
This is like a man and a seagul fighting for a single sandwitch
And just like how basically anybody could overpower a seagull, the seagull here still wins 😅 (granted a Quetz is abit more than a seagull, but your point stands lol)
More like two giant pelicans fighting a man
@@elmochomo8218 Yup, that's their sandwich now 😅
Seagulls, hm, stop it now
Last i checked, a seagull is not taller than a man
An elephant-sized predatory gecko on two legs *SNEAKING UP ON YOU* at night is nightmare fuel😆
More like featherless chicken with teeth 🦷 like iron
Or lizard chickens geckos
Elephant sized crocodilian bird
@@ryomahoffman6803 nah giant elephant sized bear wolf tiger lion croc chicken
That's one fucking huge elephant my guy
Yep. I prefer Hank and his kind more than Rexy now. I can't get enough of this design.
If you told me as a 10 year old that's how t rex might have looked I would not have believed anything.
Don't get me wrong though. Rexy is still a cult classic.
Rexy looked so good in JP, she was in her prime, they totally ruined her design in JW, I get that she was supposed to look older but idc it was still an ugly design, unecessarily shrink wrapped.
@@ryomahoffman6803 R.I.P. Stan Winston.
Rexy will always be special to me, but I love this design in Planet as it is how I see a real life Rex would look like
Prefer the older.
@@ryomahoffman6803well animals get older and won’t look the same. That what they are going for when designing her. Which make sense from the timeline between the first movie and the world movie.
These guys are really OP
Batman with prepare >>>
When u start to become a paleontology nerd u think ur going to learn about dinosaurs that r way cooler than T. rex, and while there are definitely some unknown and underrated dinosaurs, the more u learn about T.rex the more u learn that it deserves the praise that it has, they were truly kings.
So those two hunting are actually brothers as the song that plays for them is called Tyranosaurus Brothers
Hope in season 3 we'll get to see Spino aswell.
Pretty sure spino was quite a bit further back in time than this docu takes place
It will get outdated very quickly
I hope this series also tackles the Cenomanian stage as well
That depends if Prehistoric Planet won't limit itself to the Maastrichtian Age of the Late Cretaceous. By this age, Spinosaurus has long since died out
if season 3 happens it will probably be set again in the maastrichtian, there are a lot of formations to cover from that age
Dude this is 10,000x scarier than the 90s shrinkwrapped roaring T-Rex everyone is so attached to. Imagine walking through the forest and something that big is just... just... THERE. And you didn't hear it approach you. And there's multiple of them, and the only sound they make is a deep rumbling noise that sounds like a growling stomach. That's terrifying.
Massive walking eagle
The T. Rex from the 1990s was lean but very muscular. This iteration of the T. Rex looks like it needs to visit a fat farm. It's as plump as a seal.
You're having selective memory. First rex scene she breaks out and isn't hunting. Hence the noise and screaming.
Bit further down the line she sneaks up on gallis and takes one down. And at the end another sneak attack when she saves the humans.
You just think you're clever making this comment but you couldn't be more wrong
@@classicgalactica5879 It's built like a professional weight lifter. Actual strong men have a healthy layer of fat around them.
@@minutemansam1214 I worked out a lot in my younger days and I never had much fat on my body, nor did any of my friends at the gym. Some lifters did get a bit plump, but even they weren't morbidly obese. There also isn't a single large extant terrestrial predator that is plump like that. Even bears, which have a high degree of body fat, don't look like that. You can still see muscles rippling under the skin and fur when they walk or run. I seriously doubt that it was any different in the case of the T. Rex. This iteration of the King of the Dinosaurs to me just looks.... wrong, somehow.
i like that in the part where the T. rex is hunting the Edmontosaurus, I like that Edmontosaurus isn't being shown as a weak defenseless creature, and the T. rexes had to work together in order to take that giant animal down.
i don't know what it is but in the shot at 5:06 specifically it looks so real to me
i think it's the shading ...
For everyone that ignores the simple fact that T. Rex is an animal and not a monster or a videogame character, it could been scared by the two quetzals, animals avoid injury when possible, infection is a real risk, there is also the intimidation factor, vultures can drive lions off carcasses when in big enough numbers, i hope this clear the mind of some people out there.
I dont believe vultures can drive off lions from their kill, let alone a male lion. but I can see them driving of cheetahs. Although the quetzals appears bigger than the trex, its light weight compared to t-rex and I cannot imagine this would have happened in real. No bird would risk its ability to fly.
@@chiragdarji1571 that is no bird, that's a fucking 5 meter tall reptile, and also vultures can do that, even male lions, hyenas do that too, now there is no way a much heavier and powerful animal like a lion would give up their food to a much weaker hyena, right? But that's what happen, hyenas scare away lions from carcasses because it is not worth for the lions to risk getting injured even if they can kill every hyena, they would die of infection or would be too weak to hunt
Great blue herons have long beaks and are tall birds, but that doesn't stop bald eagles from frequently hunting them. Bald eagles will also land in herons nests and eat the eggs right in front of the screaming parents, and looks at them as much as if to say; try something. I dare you. There are videos of it right here on TH-cam. It then leaves after eating it's fill. There's no way even very large pterodactyl's were going to drive off the King of the Dinosaurs.
@@chiragdarji1571well it have happen multiple time in the wild. You don’t believe it cause it doesn’t make sense to you. But nature doesn’t have to make sense for you to understand. It happen.
@@classicgalactica5879I know it hard for you to understand but it nature. It happen everytime. Different between the bird you mentioned and to a quetzal is that quetzal is taller than a T. rex and have a large beak that can injure an inexperienced animal. The difference is that the T. rex can’t fly, so comparing a quetzal and a T. rex to an eagles and other small bird isn’t a good comparison. Rex don’t hunt quetzal cause it risky, same as risking hunting a bull triceratops. And there two of quetzal challenges a Rex. You are focusing on a single eagles hunting a single herons.
The king is here
Who got clap by 2 birds lol.
Spino is king
Lie
@@luisfernando5998 lie
@@luisfernando5998did u Listin to the very first line
4:15 me in any dinosaur game when i see a huge predator:
2:24 is such a cool shot
It's such a funny contrast seeing it open and close it's mouth
It's like those clips of baboons and snakes yawning, first it's just a serene face and the next second massive fangs protude out of it
Ask yourself if you would fight two pelicans for a burger and your only weapon is your face.
Muricans: cowabunga it is
@@matheusexpedito4577murica
I love this
Yes the fuck I would if I had 6 inch long sharp teeth and the strongest bite force on the planet and the burger is also big enough to feed me for several weeks
@@adf286 said birds are as tall as you, you known nothing about them, you don't known you are heavier and stronger, and they have the equivalent of a sniper rifle as face, are you going to risk uneeded injury and potential infenction?
Tyrannosaurus was the most powerful land predator of earth history due to his powerfull jaws.
No
@@igornagonski8215 ye
Fuck Yeah
@@SuperiorPhantom-dx6vh indeed FUCK YEAH
@@osky9077 no
strongest bite in the animal kingdom
VS
B E A K
Shotgun vs sniper
@@matheusexpedito4577 be polite, be efficient, have a plan to kill everyone you meet.
That beak is legit bigger than the t-rex skull, i bet u wouldn't like to loose ur eyes to that
@@dev4159”bigger”😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂
@@dev4159Longer and much narrower. Not bigger lol.
Damn this was so good
The largest land predator ever on earth
No
@@igornagonski8215 Proofs!?
@@meli-melo9759so spinosaurus doesn’t exist then
@@aidangm7419 spinosaurus isn't the largest land carnivore anymore
@@aidangm74192001 called, they want their outdated facts back
Give us Jurassic or Triassic
Hell even Permian for Gods sake
Every single documentary shows the cretaceaus the most
The dinosaurs were awesome in Cretaceous that's why
Go cry somewhere else
@@MozTheBoz they were awesome in all 3 eras
@@mhdfrb9971 imma cry in your wardrobe at night
There might be a reason for that. Namely the fact that the late Cretaceous is where the majority of our fossils come from thanks to the KT Asteroid.
They're Like Buck And Doe
rex got to be nocturnal to hunt in the night
Idk if it’s just my screen but it seems like the nighttime hunt looks almost digitally enhanced to give us a better view in the dark, like they were going so much for a real life nature documentary feel they enhanced the lighting in post so the audience could see better.
These rexes can really stand to miss a meal...
You know that most of that mass is muscle, not fat, right?
Why did they pick the worst platform to gatekeep this on? F apple.
Most accurate T-Rex
I’m pleased seeying trex as an animal instead of a bloodthristy monster…. But look at it, i would love to see this organic tank smesh te sh*t out of another Big theropod y the next season ngl
When prehistoric planet became a horror film😱
In sesson 2
Looks like they came to terms and paid the T-Rex's what they were seeking....
Now I’m starting to like the Prehistoric Planet planet tyrannosaurus I also do like when it opens his mouth you do see its teeth which is a good thing even though that I still disagree with the lips and that’s fine if you can agree or disagree with me or at least it has teeth when it opens unlike a most art depiction’s sometimes when they open their mouths, you barely can’t even see their teeth which I don’t like
You can disagree with the lips but it's a fact they had them. Lips are the ancestral condition of all tetrapods. You may not like it because it's not 'cool', but this is a documentary, not a monster movie. These animals are made to be as accurate to the science as possible, not indulge in monster movie fantasies.
@@minutemansam1214 actually at this point, I don’t care if it have them or not but there are other scientist out there that still think that he did not have lips like Dr. Thomas car and Tracy Ford
@@minutemansam1214 also until we find a tyrannosaur mummy, we will know the truth
Idk why I'm having mixed thoughts for this design. One shot it's the coolest looking, realistic Rex, the other shot it looks like a huge, fat blob. Maybe it's just the skin patterns. but I do prefer the Tarbosaurus design more.
Not fat
I wouldn't make them skinnier but maybe it just needs a little more muscle definition.
That's not fat, that's muscle. The reason why they're so barrel-chested is because their gastralia gives them a deep torso.
I mentioned this on another thread. But I’m really, *really* getting sick of the subversive narrative trend in extinct animal fandom.
Let me get this out of the way first. Do I have issues with the Quetz VS Rex scene? No, absolutely not, I think it’s a great scene and it’s very fitting in a nature documentary, and it’s refreshing to see:
1. Another animal that’s not a Trike or Anky successfully fending off a T. rex.
2. A powerful apex predator like the T. rex showing a very reasonable sense of self-preservation.
What I *do* have a problem with is the attitude surrounding it. Armchair online paleontologists seem to *really like* doubling down on the subversive narrative that is this weird hipster mentality of “oh, the thing the mainstream media used to tell as the norm is COMPLETELY DIFFERENT!”. Thus, you get all these depictions of hadrosaurs harnessing this so-called “herbivore power”, demonstrated with them being a violent and unstoppable juggernaut. Or you know, ceratopsids happily feasting on a mutilated carcass (usually that of a carnivorous theropod for extra subversive points!) just to show that sometimes herbivores also eat meat for extra supplements? This is to name a few notable examples.
How many times have you seen art of dromaeosaurs with exaggerated forms of plumage in a gruesome scene where it disembowel and eat their prey alive? How many times have *Yutyrannus* been set as an example just to deliver the “see?! Feathers can be scary!” What is this weird obsession to monster-ify dinosaurs while also trying to subvert the pop-culture norm? What’s wrong with them just being animals and not a “totally scary and savage” animal? I swear, I’ve seen people trying to shoehorn arguments that the PP *Velociraptor* is an example of how “scientifically accurate animals can be scary” and I’m like… What? At no point in the documentary that the *Velociraptor* is attempted to be depicted as a savage, terrifying beast. It looks like a regular desert animal that does desert animal things.
You know what’s funny? This is very similar to the awesomebro mindset, just from the opposite side of the spectrum in terms of paleontological accuracy. Which is ironic since apparently awesomebros are such a dreaded boogeyman in the paleosphere.
And now, azhdarchids are starting to get the same treatment.
If you see the Sue T Rex skeleton the idea of a flimsy giant bat-like animal chasing it off is difficult to believe.
You haven't seen yet the MOR 008 t-rex specimen.
If you look at the average male human skeleton, the thought of men being chased off by geese would also seem ridiculous.
Yet many choose to run from an animal whose neck we could *easily* break because it's just not worth it.
@@miyamiyasvideovault5838 that's bcz a lot of humans r privileged n don't need to hunt or fight for their food but i bet u anything humans from 3000yrs would rip the heads off of geese today
Being harassed by two giraffe-sized storks would make anything retreat.
@@nightrider3889 Ok bro.
Go explain that to a Bear/Lion who got their kill stolen by a wolverine/honey badger they could definitely clap if they tried 👍
4:38 and 5:23 sounds like JP tyrannosaurus
That’s because it actually is a JP T rex roar lol
My bro think that those sound come from crocodile and lion
Cuz JP Sound is accurate
@@MAKATOONY lol no
@@gergopiroska5749 New Generation of Kids Argument: lol no
T-Rex sneakers. :O
jesus h. did you edit this with a cleaver?
Is this the mated pair from last season? I seen parts of this
Maybe
No they are actually brothers as the song that plays for them is called Tyrannosaurus Brothers
lol so when they ask to turn on screen time, hmmm lol
Why does it look like they’re smiling all the time
That's just how their mouths are shaped.
Why were the arms on trex so small
There are many theories. For some reason, T. rex had comparatively small, yet very well developed arms. Their arms were actually strong enough to bench press 400 lbs. One theory says that they used their arms to assist in mating by holding onto females while the male mounted. Another theory says their arms are small because there's no need to have powerful arms when their bite is more than enough to do the job. One theory I like is that T. rex had small arms so they're less likely to be bitten off or injured during combat with other members of their species.
Quetz broke server rules bro
No?
what year?
About 60,000,000 years ago
Good to see it did not roar to tell everyone it made a kill. Announcing a kill is all hollywood. No predator makes such announcement.
Why in the Quetz vs Trex part the rex has red eyes like it's high as fuck?
that's the only real explanation to why it backed off. was high as a kite, probably consumed some roots or mushrooms by accident
@@hazardeur If i was high and 2 honking flying demons started to try to stab me in the eyes I would leave the area too.
“Pads on its feet” would exist to absorb shock to the animal; not to make it more silent in the woods. A predator that large would still make a ton of noise snapping sticks and branches; not to mention stirring up small animals that would produce a cacophony of scared calls.
This is dumb
False. A predator that large would be able to walk in silence. Elephants are about as massive as T. rex. If one walked up behind you you wouldn't hear it.
Learn basic facts about reality.
@@minutemansam1214 have you ever walked in a forest?
Those ugly birds humiliated the rex 😮.
Would have been the other way around if it was not in an open plain beach 😅
-rex is more of a bird than quetzalcoatlus really-
also in fairness he wasn't really humiliated he was just being wise instead of mindlessly prideful
Where the hell do you see a bird?
The closest thing to a bird here is the T.Rex
Yea I'd beat u would love loosing a eye to those
The trex is more a bird then the Quetzals
According to Jurassic Park all you had to do is freeze and the T-Rex would lose sight of you. It's vision is based on movement. lol Ridiculous
Bruh are just being sarcastic or do you actually believe that?
how did this thing balance????
like santa claus one big f##king hoax😂
That's why they have tails my guy, it helps balance the weight and evenly distributes it
@@aboxofissues1369 ...id love to believe, but there is no complete skeleton of these , mostly supisitions
@@johntynan8161 The skeleton of Sue is mostly complete and features the tail
@@johntynan8161 You really need to research things before saying stuff.
@@jacobcox4565 whatever cult you want to follow, i have no prob with that.
...ill hang back til a better specimen emerges
4:39 I don’t know why they use the Jurassic Park T-Rex sound, but just a lower pitch since obviously this sound was an elephant
I refuse to believe a full-grown, hungry T-Rex would be to worried about an oversized cross between a pelican and a bat, not even two of them.
It's quite simple, it is not a killing machine, it's a animal.
Sure it has OP feats, but it's better to avoid any unnecessary injury for something so big that they wouldn't even eat as much compared to it, the it can come back later. Their beaks are literally longer that it's skull, loosing a eye here is totally a fatal possibility and could screw it up.
It was an animal, not a killing machine, they made it clear that a rex would fold these two up completely but it chose not to because it knows the risks, it could lose an eye and even the slightest of injuries could lead to infections
@EmpyreusAwakening Yeah, I don't think that T-Rex understood how infections work. Yes, you are right. T-Rex was an animal, not a killing machine.
But I can't help but believe T-Rex was an aggressively territorial animal. T-Rex most likely laid claim to all or above all things in his or her territory, especially when it came to food, I would wager. I imagine a full-grown bull T-Rex wasn't going to back down to any other creature in his territory other than possibly a larger T-Rex. I still say he ain't letting no oversized cross between a pelican and a bat (or even two of them) chase him away from a meal. At the end of the day, if a T-Rex was hungry enough, it would throw caution to the wind.
@@FuzzyWuzzy75 Dude, what part of "animals avoid any unnecessary conflit to avoid unnecessary damage that can cause worse scenarios to them" u did not understand ? it is CLEAR animals know how infections works, not how they happen but that they appear when getting injured. And infections are a big problem.
I think u don't realize how massive animals actually live, just because it has a big ass jaw doesn't mean it can beat anything else at it's path, a simple Triceratops is dangerous enough to put a end on a Trex. A fucking flying giraffe with a beak longer than the Trex head can clearly do something while fly above it, it can't even reach the bastard.
And anyways, with such a big carcass like this, those flying reptiles aren't even going to eat half of it, it can just come back later and eat it in peace.
@dev4159 Thank you for your words of wisdom, Dr. Doolittle, I was half inclined to take them seriously but then thought Naah, why would I?
"Simple triceratops?" You make the triceratops sound harmless, lol. I could see where even a large T-Rex would avoid a perfectly healthy bull triceratops or a female triceratops with offspring as being far more likely than a T-Rex avoiding confrontation with an over grown pelican/bat. The triceratops would pose a far greater risk than the pelican/bat in a fight.
Your whole argument is flawed. Would not, the pelican/bat want to avoid a fight with a T-Rex for precisely the same reason? Would it not behoove the pelican/bat to let T-Rex get his fill first and then come back after he moved on?
The risks to the pelican/bat would be far greater than to the T-Rex. The pelican/bat's beak did not have the tensile strength to do much damage to the skin of a T-Rex.
The pelican/bat would have to be an absolute marksman with that beak to get a bull's eye shot on the T-Rex's eye all while attacking within easy striking distance of the most dangerous part of the T-Rex which is his jaws/teeth.
In nature, the biggest, the strongest, and the baddest always eat first, the rest get the leftovers, if there are any. And that law of nature would have damned sure applied to a naturally territorial and hungry T-Rex. But nice try, Dr. Doolittle, go back to playing your Jurassic Park game and stop trying to pretend like you know something.
😭😭😭
This is exact proof that Jurassic park is hundred percent wrong about t rex but I respect there reasons
It actually was pretty accurate for the time it came out, just super outdated now
JP was a movie. Not exactly the avenue by which to seek reality. The 1949 movie "The sands of Iwo Jima?" If you want to know what happened there in 1945...don't count on this movie.
How can they know any of this really?
Fossil evidence, modern analogs, and some amount of educated speculation. Think of it, T. rex was huge, and recent studies put its top speed at about 15 mph, but its prey is faster. T. rex also lived in wetland forests that would've looked a lot like the Everglades of Florida, that means plenty of foliage that can be used as cover. T. rex also had an incredibly powerful bite that would allow it to end hunts quickly. There's really no other way a T. rex could hunt other than ambushing, and if T. rex had to have ambushed its prey, that means it also had to be very quiet when taking steps. Elephants have pads on their feet that make them practically silent when walking, and Elephants are similar in size to T. rex. It makes a lot of sense once you lay everything out like that.
Quetzalcoatlus would’ve eat the trex 🥱
Trying to saurus Rex has a bone crushing bite, and it is more intelligent than the Quetzalcoatl us. The quetzal would try to attack it, but then get broken bones out of it and the quetzal would not be able to touch the rex Rex.
The Quetzalcoatlus behaved much like carrion birds do by annoying the big land predator until it leaves
"And it is more intelligent than the Quetzalcoatlus." Source please. Flying is a HUGE +. Birds for instance also have very small brains, but some of the most intelligent creatures on this planet like corvids are birds. Plus, any animal that flies has to have a decently developed brain.
@@Leon-bc8hm well they re-searched for a Tyrannosaurus rex specimen to have the intelligence close to primate
@@Leon-bc8hmone study specifically noted the T.rex had brain neuron counts in the millions, close to modern primates like baboons.
As good as this show is, there is a flaw... at the end of the video, when 2 pterasors chase away a T-rex... well, to put likely: thats is simply not possible... you cant compare vultures chasing away hienas to a kill with pterasors chassing away a trex. Vultures are pound for pound nearly as large as a hiena, while pterasors arent nearly as large as a trex. Also because of their size, pterasor wings are paper thin, to reduce weight, to make it possible to fly... so a pterasor, for its size, it only weighs as little more then a human... while a trex clocks out at 7tones... also any injury to a pterasor could spell disaster and leave it unable to fly... so what would a trex bite would do to a pterasor? The answer: not gonna end up well for the pterasor... thats for sure... and the trex could inflict tremendous damage even without his signature bite force... one swipe from that tale and its game over for any pterasor... pterasors, as well as birds, are higly vulnerable to blunt force hits... their bones are hollow... and can witstand torsion (unlike mammal or reptile bones) but are verry vulnerable to blunt force trauma... (wich mammal and reptiles can shrug off)... in conclussion: there is no way a pterasor or two or even a dozen, could chase a trex from a kill... maybe the trex had eaten its full... but its higly probable it would guard the kill for future consumption... so, 2 pterasors would never be able to scare a trex from a kill... the risk of dieing is to great... thats like 2 hungry little puppies would try to take on a full grown bear guarding its kill... thats not gonna happen... still, this show is amaizing... by far the best dinosaur documentary since walking with series...
This is a very long-winded way of saying “I don’t fully understand how risk-averse predators are”. The _T. rex_ is faced with two tall animals that can peck its eyes out. It can either wait until they’ve had their fill (and they’re not conceivably eating the whole _Alamosaurus_ carcass), or risk losing an eye or two and probably dooming itself. It picks the former.
@@Cavan_ nah dude. i get what you're saying and it is usually true but there are levels tro this game too. this is like a tiger waiting for two storks feeding on his carcass (if they would eat meat of course) i would play out like this: t rex walks up and as soon as the q's see him, they're fucking gone for good
I think the same, but believe the trex didnt have the reasoning a human have, so in the rex eyes, is Just probably two tall flying creatures shouting n attacking him. I think is not about dominance or strength, is like he feels uncomfortable and leaves bc whatever, he can come back later. 🤷🏻♂️
They are literally bigger than the t-rex, lol
@@randomusername3873 how?
the Trex is not a hunter , but an obvious scavenger on the huge carcasses of dinos too big to hunt.....
GO DO YOUR RESEARCH YOU 2-DAY-OLD BABY
A MASSIVE PREDATOR LIKE THAT WOULDN'T FIND ENOUGH FOOD TO SUSTAIN ITSELF BY JUST BEING A SCAVANGER
IT HAS BINOCULAR VISION TIPICAL OF HUNTERS AND A IT IS RIDICULOUSLY SMART, THERE ARE MANY FOSSILS WITH T REX BITE MARKS OF ANIMALS THAT SURVIVED A T REX ATTACK
AND IT SURPRISES ME I HAVE TO EXPLAIN THIS WHEN YOU COULD ACCTUALLY BOTHER TO DO YOUR RESEARCH INSTEAD OF TALKING FALSE INFORMATION BASED ON HOLLYWOOD GARBAGE
We have confirmed fossils of hadrosaurs and triceratops with healed T. rex bite marks.
Proofs? Tyrannosaurus is APEX in its formation.
Yeah, a scavenger needed the greatest eyesight, smell, hearing and bite force to ever roam the Earth...
Why would a scavenger have the strongest bite force of any land carnivore in the history of the world? Scavengers tend to have teeth and jaws that are good for tearing flesh off of bone, only exception I can think of in the current day are hyenas. The T-Rex’s teeth and jaws and designed for crushing and penetration. Not to mention all the other evidence that backs up T-Rex being an apex predator
No way is T-Rex losing to two overgrown birds. They would fight each other constantly. They were 9-ton pitbulls.
Well i dont think you wanna lose your eye balls
@@ricker4394 The Quetz's would lose a lot more than that if they end up getting caught in its jaws. A bite from a T-Rex could just decapitate them or crush any part of their body easily. T-Rexes could rip off Triceratop's heads which literally weighed twice as much as the Quetz on their own.
@@EGarrett01quetz also has the ability to get away alot easier without injury to itself. Although i do question how easy was it really for quetz to get up in the air like that
@@chaoticcatartist They showed them getting off the ground really fast in the earlier episode, but that might have been a different pterosaur.
Staying away from danger was probably a big part of T. rexs life, they were enormous creatures and they lived in forests, a simple trip on a log could’ve kill one, they were probably pretty aware of what to stay away from
Spinosaures > trex
Nice joke
@@mhdfrb9971 you mean trex is a joke? I agree
@@luisfernando5998 ain't no fish eater gonna beat a 8 tons bone crusher
@@mhdfrb9971 you mean the largest predatory dinosaur to walk the earth vs a scavenger with bone crushing needed to eat left overs
@@luisfernando5998 Spino didn’t even walk dude it waddled like a duck lmao 😂
Edmontosaurus shouldve won smh
A single edmontosaurus doesn't stand a chance against 2 t rex. 1v1 maybe but definitely not 2
This is a documentary made by paleontologists not st upid animal battle made by kids. Paleontologists don't care which is stronger, it just prey and predator scene
One on one, it has a good chance, but it’s still not going to be a curbstomp in favor of the hadrosaur.
Two on one? That’s a mismatch.
how tho?
Tyrannosaurs ate hadrosaurs often. We have fossil evidence of this. On average, Edmontosaurus was around 38 ft and 4-5 tons; half the mass of an average T. rex. The largest two specimens of Edmontosaurus in the world indicate a MAXIMUM length of around 48 ft with a weight of about 9 tons. So the even the very largest of them was still only about the same mass as a typical Tyrannosaurus and had literally none of the weapons. The idea of a 4-6 ton hadrosaur somehow fighting off a 7-9 ton T. rex is about as realistic as an 800 cow with no horns fighting off a 1000 lb brown bear. It didn’t happen. At least not often.
The only unrealistic scene of the series!!!
No?
I find the idea of a 6 tonnes animal 'sneaking' through the underbrush of a dense forest to be ridiculous. They would crack branches and whatnot, and they probably also smelled pretty bad (no, 'staying down wind' in such conditions is also not going to do the trick). This is the fantasy of some office dweller who has never been in a wild forest.
Elephants weigh about six tons and can walk through a forest without making noise. An elephant can be ten feet behind you and you wouldn't know it was there.
You seem to be the one out of touch with nature. T. rex is a predator. It needed to be able to move silently in order to hunt. Or do you not understand how hunting works?
Why didn’t Quetzalcoatlus eat the trex
I’m pretty sure it just wanted to scare it off so it could get the alamasaurus which is definitely a bigger meal than a trex
It was looking for the Alamo and anyway they cannot kill a Rex.
Because they wanted the Alamosaurus carcass, so they pecked at and annoyed the Rex until it left
why try to kill a predator 40 times your size when you can just scare it off and eat the 60 ton animal that already died
Because it couldn't. Just because 2 of them were able to drive him off from prey doesn't mean they could kill him in battle to the death.
Bitte schön auf DEUTSCH sprechen und übersetzen. Wir verstehen kein einziges Wort.