The fact that Bismarck sliding in the Himalayan mountain and the hull still able to take that much scraping and still intact till the teleportation is proving how durable she really is.
Because developers were lazy: Third person requires animation and effort They also did all the swinging parts in third person, but if you look at the shadows, the animations actually suck I did not buy the game
@@Boozneos-h2xI can tell. The game is awesome. What do you mean lazy? First-person actually requires the same amount of work, since you will be looking at the models and textures a lot closer.
@ the game is lazy: fps requires much less effort because you don’t need animations, you only need quick and absolutely unnatural hand movements + and steady cam that is just not realistic since your head in real life shakes and doesn’t give you that chicken-head stability you get in video games Furthermore a game based on Indy and doesn’t allow you to see Indy in action (but “you” as Indy) is just not as exciting as a third person adventure game. Tomb Raider and Uncharted is just better First person games are may be good for games where the protagonist is fucking nobody and you can better identify in an anonymous character, but it doesn’t work for Indiana jones, reason why many people just boycott this game We just don’t like certain things to be forced on us. At least give the opportunity to choose between third person and first person, that would be more democratic
Note: that is a fucking BISMARCK class battleship, made 3 years AFTER the game. I tried checking to see if it was a scharnhorst class but no, it is not THAT IS THE BISMARCK IN 1937.
@@psych46 I understand the reference, but that is not an Admiral Hipper. Hipper has two masts while this one has only one mast. The main guns are too big to be 8 inch and Hipper only has 2 secondaries on each side (I see 3 on each side of the Kummetz.), The funnel is more inclined (than the Hippers straight funnel), superstructure is too tall (compared to Hippers shorter superstructure), ship is TOO WIDE (Bismarck is around 36m while Hipper is 21.3, if it was an Hipper then it would be very narrow.)
For a better detail, check the ship at 8:04. 4 x 2 38 cm (15 in) SK C/34 3 x 2 (6 x 2 counting the other side) 15 cm (5.9 in) SK C/28. From the photos of the hipper, she only has 8-inch 4 x 2's for primarys and 4.1-Inch Anti Air Gun Mounts for secondaries.
The fact that Bismarck sliding in the Himalayan mountain and the hull still able to take that much scraping and still intact till the teleportation is proving how durable she really is.
3:51 you know the kind of enemy you’re dealing with when they literally stare down their fear in the face and remain a threat to the protagonist.
I dont understand why put it in fps while when you climb a ledge or hang on a rope they show you in 3rd person?
Because developers were lazy: Third person requires animation and effort
They also did all the swinging parts in third person, but if you look at the shadows, the animations actually suck
I did not buy the game
@@Boozneos-h2xI can tell. The game is awesome. What do you mean lazy? First-person actually requires the same amount of work, since you will be looking at the models and textures a lot closer.
@ the game is lazy: fps requires much less effort because you don’t need animations, you only need quick and absolutely unnatural hand movements + and steady cam that is just not realistic since your head in real life shakes and doesn’t give you that chicken-head stability you get in video games
Furthermore a game based on Indy and doesn’t allow you to see Indy in action (but “you” as Indy) is just not as exciting as a third person adventure game. Tomb Raider and Uncharted is just better
First person games are may be good for games where the protagonist is fucking nobody and you can better identify in an anonymous character, but it doesn’t work for Indiana jones, reason why many people just boycott this game
We just don’t like certain things to be forced on us. At least give the opportunity to choose between third person and first person, that would be more democratic
Note: that is a fucking BISMARCK class battleship, made 3 years AFTER the game. I tried checking to see if it was a scharnhorst class but no, it is not THAT IS THE BISMARCK IN 1937.
Actually, its called the Kummetz, yes the Kummetz who commanded the Blucher when it got curbstomped by the Norwegians.
@@xanderdownunder1995 maybe time travel?
Hey bro, it looks more like an Admiral Hipper class heavy cruiser. Even the "Kummetz" is a tongue in cheek reference to it too! 🤣
@@psych46 I understand the reference, but that is not an Admiral Hipper. Hipper has two masts while this one has only one mast. The main guns are too big to be 8 inch and Hipper only has 2 secondaries on each side (I see 3 on each side of the Kummetz.), The funnel is more inclined (than the Hippers straight funnel), superstructure is too tall (compared to Hippers shorter superstructure), ship is TOO WIDE (Bismarck is around 36m while Hipper is 21.3, if it was an Hipper then it would be very narrow.)
For a better detail, check the ship at 8:04.
4 x 2 38 cm (15 in) SK C/34
3 x 2 (6 x 2 counting the other side) 15 cm (5.9 in) SK C/28.
From the photos of the hipper, she only has 8-inch 4 x 2's for primarys and 4.1-Inch Anti Air Gun Mounts for secondaries.