How Carl Jung Knew God: Exploring The Divine Archetype

แชร์
ฝัง
  • เผยแพร่เมื่อ 21 พ.ย. 2024

ความคิดเห็น • 40

  • @Magik1369
    @Magik1369 หลายเดือนก่อน +19

    Jung stressed that the archetype is not the actual thing in itself. The archetype of the Divine points to a Divine Reality, which is absolutely real to those who have encountered it directly. The Self is not merely an archetype. It is the human Soul/Spirit.

  • @ericddl
    @ericddl หลายเดือนก่อน +15

    Many of my beliefs were heavily influenced by Jung. I always loved his , "I don't believe in God, I know." Great video.

  • @sabe5805
    @sabe5805 29 วันที่ผ่านมา +4

    It is ridiculous how well crafted these videos are, please keep up the amazing work; and best of luck to you on your own journey

  • @benkelly7182
    @benkelly7182 29 วันที่ผ่านมา +7

    Jung believed in an incomprehensible God that comprised the whole of reality which includes all pairs of opposites. Including good and evil. He called this Abraxas. Christ to him was symbolic of the Self/Ego relationship.
    A lot of people assume Jung is talking about their god when they watch and if you dig into his own writings Jung’s version of god is very very different than most.

    • @danielverdel7502
      @danielverdel7502 29 วันที่ผ่านมา +5

      Jung’s “concept of God” (which is already a paradox because God is non-dual and can’t be conceptualized) is IMO most similar to the Advaita Vedanta view.
      He says he “doesn’t believe in God, he knows” because with a healthy enough ego, one is able to let go of their idea of themselves without fear of losing it, and explore that which cannot be known from the individual perspective… aka God aka Brahman aka Self.
      Jung knows God is not something separate from what one is. He has seen that he is not just the mind/body/persona but the underlying consciousness that is unaffected by happenings in form.

    • @artist6696
      @artist6696 27 วันที่ผ่านมา +1

      @@danielverdel7502 I wish we were friends

    • @danielverdel7502
      @danielverdel7502 27 วันที่ผ่านมา +1

      @@artist6696 “Friendship is an art of keeping distance, while love is an art of intimacy.” -Sigmund Freud
      Lovers or GTFO! 😂

  • @rjsullivan3869
    @rjsullivan3869 27 วันที่ผ่านมา +3

    Nice to hear a real voice

  • @amonynous9041
    @amonynous9041 29 วันที่ผ่านมา +6

    the difference between theists and Gnostics, theists believe, Gnostics KNOW. Gnosis means KNOWING. When you know yourself you know GOD, this is why ancient Greek said "know thyself".

    • @danielverdel7502
      @danielverdel7502 29 วันที่ผ่านมา +1

      Amen. Most people would call it blasphemous to say “I am God”… but in truth, a person who realizes this is able to step “outside” the individual perspective and realize their true nature as conscious awareness rather than over-associating with the rational mind/body/persona like most ppl will from the age 3 on.

    • @amonynous9041
      @amonynous9041 29 วันที่ผ่านมา +2

      @@danielverdel7502In eastern religions it's normal to view yourself as divine and to bow to others as a symbolic way of acknowledging you see the divine in them too, so it's a horizontal relationship. It is only in perverted Abrahamic religions that a man is separate from god, always in shame of sin, and god has to "be feared", because he's a "jealous god", they're basically describing "the devil" narcissist who is lording it over his minions, and it is also ironically from these same religions blasphemous to state you're in any way affiliated with god, let alone say something like "I'm God", then this is from their mentality viewed as trying to be "holier then thou" and you're "not pious" exactly because it's a mental projection of a religion which thrives on dominance, control and creating cognitive dissonance among it's devotees, because horizontal relationship isn't possible for them, only vertical hierarchies akin to how narcissists function, there can be no equality. All accusatory judgements created by them are basically projections just describing themselves and their mode of operation, their super ego which was implanted into them by their parents by indoctrination, every accusation a confession.

  • @eirini1501
    @eirini1501 28 วันที่ผ่านมา

    Thank you very much for sharing! Your video is amazing! Keep up the good work! I love very much Carl Jung 🥰

  • @MarichuTORRES-o2d
    @MarichuTORRES-o2d 21 วันที่ผ่านมา

    Beautiful soul of Jung❤❤

  • @JanOsborn-w6x
    @JanOsborn-w6x 16 วันที่ผ่านมา

    The song "beautiful savior" tells you who the true creator is, yet you're not supposed to tell, due to a world histeria.
    Listen closely and dissect it yourself. ❤

  • @lop1180
    @lop1180 29 วันที่ผ่านมา +1

    Beautiful ❤

  • @timu-san
    @timu-san 27 วันที่ผ่านมา +2

    Nice religious paintings

  • @Avzigoyhbasilsikos
    @Avzigoyhbasilsikos หลายเดือนก่อน +1

    Great video

  • @mehenra485
    @mehenra485 25 วันที่ผ่านมา +1

    Also it seems to me that his spritual or even "paranormal" propensities come from his mothers side. If i recall it right in the family from his mothers side there were so called psychics.

  • @electricjellyfish375
    @electricjellyfish375 10 วันที่ผ่านมา +1

    You go through enough stuff, and you'll find out real quick.

  • @susankeenan5534
    @susankeenan5534 26 วันที่ผ่านมา +1

    Thx

  • @justinhart2831
    @justinhart2831 28 วันที่ผ่านมา +1

    As much as I respect Jung, I hate it when anybody says "I don't just think, I *know*" when talking about their own religious beliefs. Every random with a mutually exclusive vision of what God wants other people to do says they *know*.

    • @artist6696
      @artist6696 27 วันที่ผ่านมา +2

      I've actually just copy and pasted a great reply from another comment on this vid which explains how Jung's beliefs differ from the general religious ideas we come across.
      "Jung’s “concept of God” (which is already a paradox because God is non-dual and can’t be conceptualized) is IMO most similar to the Advaita Vedanta view.
      He says he “doesn’t believe in God, he knows” because with a healthy enough ego, one is able to let go of their idea of themselves without fear of losing it, and explore that which cannot be known from the individual perspective… aka God aka Brahman aka Self.
      Jung knows God is not something separate from what one is. He has seen that he is not just the mind/body/persona but the underlying consciousness that is unaffected by happenings in form."

    • @AzureBat
      @AzureBat 24 วันที่ผ่านมา +1

      It does suck that a lot of people throw those words around, but trust me, knowing god is a whole nother state of being... A state you can get to...

    • @NamelessAwarenessG
      @NamelessAwarenessG 23 วันที่ผ่านมา

      The only exception I will craft for this is for those who had direct experience of impersonal God.

  • @Atjayvang21
    @Atjayvang21 26 วันที่ผ่านมา

    I believe in God he was my daughter

  • @Geoffzilla
    @Geoffzilla 23 วันที่ผ่านมา +1

    Except that no one knows. No one ever has. No one ever will. No one can know anything about god, the soul, or the afterlife. No one.

  • @timu-san
    @timu-san 27 วันที่ผ่านมา

    Careful with words.

  • @JohnWright-p5e
    @JohnWright-p5e 29 วันที่ผ่านมา +1

    ...past the light you learn to understand the ark angels an archy becomes inevitable. And sustainable

    • @JohnWright-p5e
      @JohnWright-p5e 29 วันที่ผ่านมา

      This is where it seems EverLasting Life is also. Im fearful ive alone found it not my plan

    • @timu-san
      @timu-san 27 วันที่ผ่านมา

      I think they're called arch angel

  • @peacockLife
    @peacockLife 29 วันที่ผ่านมา

    interesting, seemingly he was split on this issue too..

  • @JohnWright-p5e
    @JohnWright-p5e 29 วันที่ผ่านมา

    🤘

  • @JohnWright-p5e
    @JohnWright-p5e 29 วันที่ผ่านมา

    Reader believes the Earth a stationary flowing thru rules planet. Its a grande ship mate 🏴‍☠️🤘

    • @timu-san
      @timu-san 27 วันที่ผ่านมา

      Travelling through what?

  • @dspondike
    @dspondike 6 วันที่ผ่านมา

    Carl Jung’s “archetypes” are essentially a subset of Richard Dawkins’ “memes”, but (unfortunately) endowed with the supernatural.

  • @raginald7mars408
    @raginald7mars408 29 วันที่ผ่านมา +1

    i Di Otick muSick!

    • @jonjenkins
      @jonjenkins 27 วันที่ผ่านมา

      ?🤔

    • @timu-san
      @timu-san 27 วันที่ผ่านมา

      Quite.. I'll take it with a naan bread please.