Phishing for Phools: the economics of manipulation and deception

แชร์
ฝัง
  • เผยแพร่เมื่อ 21 ธ.ค. 2024

ความคิดเห็น • 21

  • @aremedyproject9569
    @aremedyproject9569 8 ปีที่แล้ว +8

    Brilliant. So much information from a person with a real passion for his subject.

  • @michaels8297
    @michaels8297 4 ปีที่แล้ว +3

    This man is a world class human being.

  • @campusseoul
    @campusseoul 7 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

    It is an insightful book by Nobel Prize-winning economists George A. Akerlof and Robert J. Shiller.

  • @DanDanRongaiOne
    @DanDanRongaiOne 3 หลายเดือนก่อน

    Phishing For Phools has been one of my best eye opening books 📚

  • @nbme-answers
    @nbme-answers 5 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    @1:58 Nice ovation for Professor Shiller!

  • @maori_brotha
    @maori_brotha 8 ปีที่แล้ว +3

    Great stuff: finally an economist realises what marketers have known for a long time - people are really suckers.

  • @gc2161
    @gc2161 2 หลายเดือนก่อน

    Adam Smith talked about this 250 years ago. The Wealth of Nations is not 1k pages dedicated to the wonders of free markets.

  • @roniquebreauxjordan1302
    @roniquebreauxjordan1302 5 ปีที่แล้ว

    Great lecture

  • @Alexhanshuai
    @Alexhanshuai 8 ปีที่แล้ว +2

    he is very keen to behavioral economics,that surely identifies economics are not really science,just human behavior.somebody made it complicated

  • @marsmotion
    @marsmotion 8 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    great speech, very interesting. they definitely should investigate movies for behavioral cues, they're everywhere. i like the idea of regulators however we dont really have any regulation in the usa, they've all been captured by their industries. think GMO and FDA, vacine saftey and CDC, the obvious failures there recently discovered vs a vis the mmr vacine. and now regulators are thinking of banning vitamins in favor of big pharma. so regulation is good, wish we had some that actually wasn't politicized and corrupted.
    theres the next book, regulation and corruption a behavioral study...i'd buy that

  • @radzid
    @radzid 8 ปีที่แล้ว

    raises good questions.

  • @RonaldRendite
    @RonaldRendite 4 ปีที่แล้ว

    Rockstar Shiller! :D
    Wooohooo

  • @mikevincent6332
    @mikevincent6332 9 ปีที่แล้ว +3

    I don't think they take the analysis anywhere near far enough, and he's doing too much soft talk and apologizing

    • @johnnybizaro1
      @johnnybizaro1 9 ปีที่แล้ว +3

      +Mike Vincent I think it depends on your level of understanding.

    • @distopiadnb
      @distopiadnb 8 ปีที่แล้ว +2

      +Mike Vincent the theory behind is what matters - those who don't understand it talk about tones and posture.

  • @nicholasshannon1071
    @nicholasshannon1071 2 ปีที่แล้ว

    professor schiller for president...

  • @davisoneill
    @davisoneill 7 ปีที่แล้ว +3

    Karl Marx put it much better.

  • @mrzack888
    @mrzack888 9 ปีที่แล้ว +2

    Racism at 29:55

    • @zackcash4941
      @zackcash4941 7 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      mrzack888 *demographics

  • @marshallpreston88
    @marshallpreston88 4 ปีที่แล้ว

    Why do LSE students ask such long and awful questions, really, his poor face, that girls question killed him, she asked abt consuming and he just went on abt women not driving and tried to say errr ur a girl errrr socil movements errrr sorry I csnt answer haha, I love him I was so upset and these weird ego lse drones

  • @philippewinston2740
    @philippewinston2740 9 ปีที่แล้ว +3

    a lame duck speech