How Vyasa transformed Nitya into Nimitta |

แชร์
ฝัง
  • เผยแพร่เมื่อ 13 ม.ค. 2025

ความคิดเห็น • 76

  • @snghinsha1
    @snghinsha1 ปีที่แล้ว +6

    Dr Nilesh…. You are doing such great work validating our history and taking on west academia, showing them what true science is! I am greatful to you… and your work… every Person on earth must see this… and know what Indian civilisation actually is. something for which they require telescope… our ancient gurus were writing about it in coded form through naked eye. Imagine their doordarshita and siddi because of meditation

    • @extemporaneous4545
      @extemporaneous4545 ปีที่แล้ว

      This is what I had asked Dr Oak about in a video on his channel, that I'd heard that the ancient gurus got this knowledge through meditation, but he never answered me. I would like to add here that I would like to know how they could see the shadow planets Rahu and Ketu, when Western astronomy still cannot. But we know they are there because of their gravitational pull.

    • @aswinimajumder1553
      @aswinimajumder1553 12 วันที่ผ่านมา

      ​@@extemporaneous4545 Rahu and Ketu are not planet
      These are mathematical points on the ecliptic where transition of moon takes place from North / South . Meditation helps one for logical and informed thought process.

    • @extemporaneous4545
      @extemporaneous4545 12 วันที่ผ่านมา

      @@aswinimajumder1553 Thanks for clarifying about Rahu and Ketu. Would you be able to answer this: How could Uranus, which is barely visible with the naked eye, and Neptune and Pluto, which are absolutely not visible to the naked eye, have been known about by ancient astronomers, not just in India but in other parts of the world? I refer you to the Daily Mirror Online article "Were Uranus, Neptune and Pluto known to ancient Indians", which says that in the Mahabharata, they are referred to as Sumeta, Syamet and Teekshana respectively. I shall try and post the link in the next comment, just in case it doesn't post here.

  • @ranapratapsingh3416
    @ranapratapsingh3416 9 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

    No other Indic scholar will come close to Nilesh Oakji about understanding Mahabharata and Ramayana.

  • @biveksapkota1893
    @biveksapkota1893 10 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

    Never did i guess that Nilesh Oak will use linear programming, which is the field i work on

  • @Sams_Uncle
    @Sams_Uncle ปีที่แล้ว +1

    Jai ho!

  • @Rashmi-g3g
    @Rashmi-g3g 3 วันที่ผ่านมา

    No one has ever the right to doubt your studies on the Mahabharata

  • @chandrashekharvaidya6610
    @chandrashekharvaidya6610 6 วันที่ผ่านมา

    Will you able to calculate how the ancient panchang and suryasiddhant were calculated without calculator or any instrument. But still they use to predict the eclipse,moon year calender similarly to match by adding additional month for todays calender.if you no answer.pl do your research 9:19 t😊

  • @NileshOak
    @NileshOak ปีที่แล้ว +2

    In a lighter vein, a humorous note....
    "Don't bother to argue anything on the Internet. And I mean, ANYTHING.... The most innocuous, innocent, harmless, basic topics will be misconstrued by people trying to deconstruct things down to the sub-atomic level and entirely miss the point.... Seriously. Keep peeling the onion and you get no onion."
    Vera Nazarian

  • @cjeevs
    @cjeevs ปีที่แล้ว +2

    So much science

  • @shubhambhardwaj2372
    @shubhambhardwaj2372 21 วันที่ผ่านมา

    Jai Hind 🇮🇳

  • @vanhannu
    @vanhannu ปีที่แล้ว +1

    Nice

  • @askbd11
    @askbd11 7 หลายเดือนก่อน

    We eventually waiting for the LEADER BHARAT AGAIN...

  • @indreshkumaruniyal4360
    @indreshkumaruniyal4360 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    Pls write your books in Hindi language too 🙏

  • @weird_philosopher
    @weird_philosopher ปีที่แล้ว +3

    So the astronomical evidence taking the date back to 5561 BCE...
    And the written evidence taking the date back to 3101 BCE... A lot of ancient Indian texts mention the kali year... From these kali year calendar ML Raja sir has derived the date 3101 BCE...
    What we need is a constructive debate/discussion between learned people like Nilesh sir and ML Raja sir...

    • @NileshOak
      @NileshOak ปีที่แล้ว +3

      Dr. M L Raja now has 3 dates: 3143 BCE, 3138 BCE, and 3101 BCE. And he can not explain (or at least I don't understand how he arrives at them).
      Of course, if he decides on one of the 3 dates and then puts forward his proposal in a scientific fashion, I would be happy to have on camera debate with him.

    • @EkaSanatani
      @EkaSanatani ปีที่แล้ว +1

      @@NileshOak You don't have the right to ask them for a scientific proposal when your hypothesis itself is not scientific. Manipulating and cherry picking verses to suit your fraud dating is not science, it's called fraud. Just admit that you're scared shit to face them. Whether they have a date is not the point here, your date is false and they can prove it, face them and defend your date if you dare, and prove that you're not a fraud. Are you man enough for this open challenge, loser?

    • @EkaSanatani
      @EkaSanatani ปีที่แล้ว +2

      @@NileshOakDr. M L Raja date for Mahabharata is 3101 BCE. Don't simply put up a story to give impression that you're smart. You're not.

    • @weird_philosopher
      @weird_philosopher ปีที่แล้ว +4

      ​@@EkaSanatani Be little bit polite brother... 😒😒
      Nilesh sir is just putting forward his view...
      We have very few people who are working positively on our Itihaasa...
      We can find the truth only by intellectual discussion...

    • @NileshOak
      @NileshOak ปีที่แล้ว +2

      Written evidence does not take one to 3101 BCE.

  • @indreshkumaruniyal4360
    @indreshkumaruniyal4360 ปีที่แล้ว

    Please some time discribe in Hindi language too I am big fan of u 🙏

    • @dhruvsingh.themythsbuster2432
      @dhruvsingh.themythsbuster2432 ปีที่แล้ว +3

      आप अगर ऐसा चाहते हैं कि ऐसा होना चाहिए जैसा कि आपने अपनी इस मांग/इच्छा को यहां दिखाया है, तो पहले आप स्वयं इसे हिंदी में लिखने का थोड़ा सा कष्ट और प्रयास अवश्य करें।

    • @jagannathdas5491
      @jagannathdas5491 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      Rather he should connect a great hindi author known to write science topics who can translate Oaks work and offer to help. Instead of shooting advice as if Me Oak is out of ideas to spread his work and is missing a big lacuna. To be honest, a Hindi version would never get traction. For ex Rajiv Malhotras being different, विभीन्नता, didnt even sell 10% of his english version even after being inaugurated by Sw Ramdev.

    • @jagannathdas5491
      @jagannathdas5491 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      उंटावरून शिळ्या हाकतोय

  • @gsachikumarsharma8127
    @gsachikumarsharma8127 ปีที่แล้ว +2

    Don't say ancient narrative but say ancient history.

  • @BiswajitMondal-sd1oj
    @BiswajitMondal-sd1oj ปีที่แล้ว +2

    Pancha Pandavas are sons of God Indra and they share one wife Droupadi... That implies , Pancha Pandavas are signifying 5 Indriya / gaynendriya and Droupadi is signifying Mon / mind ... Again , God Krishna married 8 main women , and only implies the 8 great Oiswarjya of God / Ishwar .... Radha implies Pran / life .... Therefore , Mahabharat is symbolic , but someone or some group of people must have been created this ....

    • @KuldeepPalo
      @KuldeepPalo ปีที่แล้ว +2

      No it 8s not just before we discovered dwarka why they gave so much clarification of warriors and number of soldiers if 8t is just symbolic

    • @bhimakarma
      @bhimakarma ปีที่แล้ว

      Dharma, Vayu, Indra, Ashivini Kumaras are the fathers of the 5 Pandavas. They are not all Indra’s sons. They are all said, in Mahabharata, to have been Indras at different times.
      Symbolic meanings will always be there in every case, but that is not the whole story, but a deeper thread.

    • @bhimakarma
      @bhimakarma ปีที่แล้ว

      Everything which the absolute person does will, as a matter of symptom, have the deepest coincidences of symbolism, numerology, jyotisha and everything else - as all is a constitutional part of his svarupa.

  • @ranapratapsingh3416
    @ranapratapsingh3416 9 หลายเดือนก่อน

    My biggest question is how did Sage Vyasa know so many things in the astronomy without using any equipments .