We got 1st and 4th amendment rights here. He can talk to them however he wants (Within reason). They WERE behaving like tyrants. They aren't allowed to detain him without suspicion of a crime. Once he showed it was a walking aide they should've just took the L and sent him on his way. You can't arrest someone just because they're giving you a bit of lip.
The bodycam cop telling the drunk cop "don't say anything" and "you know how this goes" quietly to the other cop when he would not have said that to a non-cop is exactly the problem with American cops. They genuinely view themselves as like an open "secret society" where they "protect their own" and have "camaraderie" even when dispensing justice. The drunk cop going "why are you acting like this? I'm a cop!" is him drunkenly saying the quiet part loud.
you're dense, what he said is perfectly legal and protecting your own by saying something like that is protected among leo's the same as it is among citizens, cops don't have to tell citizens to be quiet the same way they don't have to tell their cop buddies. The problem is your average American citizen is too stupid to know their rights.
It doesn’t matter if he called her a tyrant, he should be put in jail for whatever crime he tried to accuse the man of. People that abuse power are scum
He didn't call her a tyrant, he simply asked her if she was one, and she said that yes she was. I keep seeing people saying he called her a tyrant, which is wrong. go back and listen.
@@luk35kywalk3r8 And an illegal detainment. He never had a gun, just a walking stick. She had no right to detain him after realizing that. I am not a fan of women being cops as pride can easily get in the way of stoic duty - it’s obvious she went into “i am going to win mode.” When male cops act this way it is even more of a disgrace. He should be ashamed.
The man who was awarded a judgement against the police is for physical and emotional damages. Also to send a message about to not be an a- hole to citizens they are supposed to protect.
The reason he called her a Tyrant is because in the USA the 1st Amendment specifically allows citizens the right to freedom of assembly and amongst other things to prevent people from Tyranny. So he mentioned it as he knew his 1st Amendment rights were being ignored in that specific way. Its very important that the police DO NOT have the right to simply search people when there is not a reasonable and articulable crime as without that requirement you are subject to a Tyrannical Government who can search anyone without cause.
He didn't call her a tyrant, he simply asked her if she was one, and she said that yes she was. I keep seeing people saying he called her a tyrant, which is wrong. go back and listen.
@@terrencemcginnis7221 I am not going back and listening, he used the word specifically as it is mentioned in the 1st amendment I "Paraphrased" but its good enough, not a fkn exam
There are plenty of cops who don't even know the laws they are supposed to be enforcing, and after years of operating like idiots, violating people's rights, they finally run into a citizen who knows their rights, like that blind guy. Cities that have cops like that need to be sued for millions until they get the message. Most cops are educated enough these days, but there are lots out there who don't know, or don't care enough to do the job right. Some cops are corrupt, and some are just plain stupid for not even knowing the law. I say sue the living shit out of any town or cop that violates your rights. If you live somewhere where this kind of crap is standard operating procedure, get out the cameras and start sueing the idiots.
The last drunk cop/lieutenant is like "And I'm not losing my career either" Well he should have thought of that before he got drunk and got behind the wheel.
We had a Mayor's son get pulled over for drunk driving and after the officers realized it was the Mayor's son they cancelled the ticket they were supposed to give him and helped drive him home. It turned into a year long fiasco with a senior police officer resigning after 30 years of service and the mayor's son ultimately drunk driving again and hitting a couple vehicles and pedestrians at a sporting event.
The problem with these idiotic cops is that they will be sued but it's the tax payers that get stuck paying these huge judgements, not the cops who violated rights. They should take the money from their retirement accounts. Even after losing their jobs, they will move away and get a job being a cop in some other town as long as they don't have a felony conviction. Know your rights, don't answer questions, don't agree to searches. Yes, it's a pain in the ass to deal with but you'll be better off in the long term. They protect each other so you need to protect yourself. That cop telling the other cop to be quiet and not answer questions is evidence of that. They would never do that for anyone else. Their goal is to lock you up regardless of innocence or guilt. These cowards have a power fetish. They are mostly the kids that were picked on in school and now they are getting their revenge. Plenty of good cops out there but they know who the bad ones are but do nothing about it, which makes them complicit , in my opinion.
The "hold on we have cards" was a very nice way for the officer to make sure that guy got the information requested without stepping on the toes of the other officer. And the disappointing look said I'm sick of this bs, I'm not risking my career for you.
In the first clip, the guy was in the right, he did nothing wrong. The police had no right to just stop him. In the USA we know and respect our rights m
@@profanepersonality that's all relative, many departments require physical and mental health checkups it just isn't across the board federally as the cops aren't federal.
The high damage award to the man that was kicked is also supposed to be a deterrent for the person to not do it again, but this breaks down when the cop is not actually the one paying for it. In lawsuits like this, if found to be guilty, they are supposed to pay for the "compensatory damages" which are actual medical and other bills directly related to the crime/tort as well as for any permanent injury or loss of body parts, and the "punitive damages" which are meant to be a punishment and deterrent for the offending party to not do it again and can be based on the wealth of the guilty party. That is why some seemly small things can become large lawsuits.
I know it's pretty minor, but the amount of times I see a cop turn on their lights just to blow through an intersection...only to shut them off right after, drives me nuts. As for the physical aspect of being a cop, the test is fairly difficult...but you only have to pass it once. Most young cops are in absolutely amazing shape...the older ones, not so much haha
When I was on summer break in college an old friend who was a cop came to pick me and a friend up to go out to a bar. It was quickly clear he was already waisted and started driving like a crazy person saying he could get away with it. We got pulled over when he was going like 70 in a 35 on the wrong side of the road. The cop who pulled us over asked if I’d been drinking. When I said no, he just told the guy to get in the back seat and told me to drive him home. Nothing else came of it. He bragged the whole way home about it. I never hung out with him again and I’ve always wondered how many cops get with sh*t like that.
I daz is very pro cops and I don’t feel negative towards cops I know a lot of good ones but after watching enough of videos like this it makes you second guess them when approached
My dad was a cop for 35 years. This was before body cams. I couldn't count how many times he was escorted home drunk by his cop buddies when they stopped him while driving drunk. He did the same thing for his friends too. Now that there are body cams, they can't get away with it as much as they once did.
@@1024laf reminds me of a body cam video with similar situation to this one, officer or sheriff pulled over for DUI.. starts asking multiple times to just get a ride home instead of an arrest and the arresting officer says, "you know I can't do that.. it's not like back in the day." [implied: 'the day before body cams']
These cops kept their jobs in the first clip - even the one who’s done this before. Shameful. And the blind man wasn’t wrong when he recognized a tyrant.
No that’s not how our law works. They had no right to search him or ask his name. He isn’t committing a crime. He was right to remind her of that. He answered her question and she continued. That’s on her which is why it’s apart of this compilation. Period.
2:30 - its not a crime to own a gun, and the suspicion is quickly gone when they find out there is no gun, so no crime couldve been committed, and therefore - they cant ask for ID
They were very wrong. This happens often in certain neighborhoods. It causes additional stress and financial problems for people who are already struggling.
I lived across the street to a married cop couple. They would always have parties of their fellow cops. There would be drunk driving, fights in the street. Neighbors called the police but no one was ever arrested. The couple would get into terrible fights and at times domestic violence on the women cop. It was so bad. The couple ended in divorce but even then the husband would come back and cause problems. Finally she moved away, all was quiet again.
They do. You didn't study the Bill of Rights, the Constitution, or any civics in school? They started teaching us the basics in 2nd or 3rd grade, and by Middle-school (if you paid attention), they had covered it all pretty deeply.
In 1 of the clips the cops are giving different orders at the same time. One cop is saying "put your hands up and turn around," and the other is saying "put your hands up and come forward." So which one do you listen to bf one puts a bullet in you bc you didn’t do what one of them said?
If two cops are telling you to surrender in different ways do you know what you should do? Just get on the ground, that's where they want you anyway, don't do that 'Well dad told me i could Mom!' bs
He didn't call her a tyrant, he simply asked her if she was one, and she said that yes she was. I keep seeing people saying he called her a tyrant, which is wrong. go back and listen.
02:37 While it may not make the officer's day go better, arrogance, "showing attitude" are neither crimes nor probable cause in the US. This whole "just forgo your rights and kowtow to the officer so they feel better" is an impossibly stupid outlook here in the states. She suddenly rolled up on an older legally blind guy minding his own business walking down the sidewalk and tried to meet his annoyance with her own power tripping. Supervisor did the same. Extremely unprofessional. Cops are servants of the public, trained to de-escalate, if possible, and she and her supervisor did the exact opposite, in the end acting as mini-"tyrants" as he suggested previously.
I love your reaction videos. And I whole heartedly agree with you on the cops not being treated the same, they should be. Especially the last one. But the first guy in this video, was doing NOTHING wrong. And he's an American that knows his rights. Which you Brits don't have the same rights as an American citizen. He was absolutely right to call them a Tyrant. We don't put with that shit. Her and her boss violated MULITPE rights GUARANTEED in the U.S. Constitution. They both should have been fired and arrested themselves. BTW if it was a gun. He's allowed to have that - it's called the 2nd Amendment. Open carry is legal everywhere.
There’s some pretty good auditor videos on YT, but there’s also some really bad ones too. It’s basically people pushing boundaries while remaining completely lawful in their actions. Most have a title like “cops take the walk of shame” but like I said, there’s some of these “auditor” guys that are disrespectful and disgusting. My favorite clip is these cops get called because two auditors are filming in public, (which is perfectly legal) and when the cops walk up to ask them questions the two guys completely ignore them and start talking about the Taco Bell menu and both cops just end up walking away. 😂
$650000 is actually NOT enough money, Daz. It’s not just about what the citizen victim deserves, but what the pig police deserve - as a message and deterrent that shows then such vile tyrannical behavior will not be tolerated by we, the people.
The problem is cops have something called "qualified immunity." They can't be personally sued for things they do while on duty. That $650,000 doesn't come from the cop, it comes from our tax dollars. It doesn't hurt the cop whatsoever.
The fact they tell other officers to not say anything else and trying to protect them and close the door, but will gladly try to coerce statements from non cop individuals in all types of dirty ways is why you can’t ever take police in the US serious or should ever that them when in custody just don’t talk, and go from there as simple as that.
The reason cops keep doing this is because they get away with it. The first "arrest", for example, it Saif that they were punished and had to do extra training... so their "discipline" is to do the same training that they've already clearly ignored and to get some paid time off at home... since when is a paid vaca a punishment? Lol if someone is a repeat offended like the first cop then they should be fired, end of discussion. Maybe the rest of the cops will be a little more professional if they had real consequences, like all of us working our jobs. Until I see a "good cop" stand up against one of these "rare" bad cops then I'm just going to assume they're all dirty. They're just lazy and like taking illegal shortcuts. Most of them are fat for a reason
After watching the entire video, I didn't hear them mention a single real penalty for any of these cops... just a slap on the wrist and I'm sure they were able to become cops again down the road. This is why they arent respected like they should be in our country. Its hard to when you know that most of them are cowards with guns
Nah. That's was all an ego and power trip on both parts. Violating rights are violating rights and she swore an oath to uphold the law. Remember the Nazi soldiers after WW2 said the same thing. That they were just following orders smh....
Wrong! Just like in the military, subordinates DO NOT have to carry out UNLAWFUL orders, and they WILL get punishment if they do carry out an unlawful order. Just like in the Nuremberg Trials in Germany, after WWII, you cannot claim that you HAD TO carry out illegal acts, simply because you were ordered to do so by a superior officer. It is each soldier's responsibility to know which orders are legal, and those which are illegal, and act accordingly. She was just as complicit as her sergeant in that illegal arrest.
There is a distinct difference between legal and lawful... for a crime to have been committed there must be harm, injury or loss caused. If a poloce officer does not know the difference between legal and lawful then that is equal to fraud.. which carries a prison sentence... It is presumed the masses have consented to statute law since birth.... for statute law to have the force of law you must CONSENT. Consent can be verbal, written or even your ignorance... ignorance is consent... Acts, statutes, codes etc... are not law unless you agree(consent) to them. You don't not have to be governed, no-one has more authority over you than you and the people you give it to.
I love my country with all my heart but my government can cover up the atrocities of police officers still boggles my mind. No this is not an atrocity some of these rights got violated nobody died. But as an American we have a certain set of beliefs that we believe our government would never do such a thing to us until it happens to us.
If you even believed that then you lived under a rock or in your own little bubble for a long time. I still can't see how some people walk around oblivious even when there is evidence to support the claims. I want to think it's just trolls but i'm starting to think a certain demographic group in the USA just live different lives and don't care about anyone else.
We got 1st and 4th amendment rights here. He can talk to them however he wants (Within reason). They WERE behaving like tyrants. They aren't allowed to detain him without suspicion of a crime. Once he showed it was a walking aide they should've just took the L and sent him on his way. You can't arrest someone just because they're giving you a bit of lip.
🎯👍🏼
Exactly they were, in English terms, acting like utterly gormless knobhead twats
100%
The bodycam cop telling the drunk cop "don't say anything" and "you know how this goes" quietly to the other cop when he would not have said that to a non-cop is exactly the problem with American cops. They genuinely view themselves as like an open "secret society" where they "protect their own" and have "camaraderie" even when dispensing justice. The drunk cop going "why are you acting like this? I'm a cop!" is him drunkenly saying the quiet part loud.
they say it to criminals too sometimes, theyre allowed to advice a suspect to shut up if they choose to
you're dense, what he said is perfectly legal and protecting your own by saying something like that is protected among leo's the same as it is among citizens, cops don't have to tell citizens to be quiet the same way they don't have to tell their cop buddies. The problem is your average American citizen is too stupid to know their rights.
It doesn’t matter if he called her a tyrant, he should be put in jail for whatever crime he tried to accuse the man of. People that abuse power are scum
Agreed. Suspensions weren’t enough. They both should have lost their jobs.
@@heofonfyr5089 Yeah, they still got their jobs and get training for something they ain't going to follow anyway. Such Bull shid.
He didn't call her a tyrant, he simply asked her if she was one, and she said that yes she was.
I keep seeing people saying he called her a tyrant, which is wrong. go back and listen.
@@terrencemcginnis7221yeah but even if he did call her that it shouldn’t matter. 1st amendment
@@luk35kywalk3r8 And an illegal detainment. He never had a gun, just a walking stick. She had no right to detain him after realizing that. I am not a fan of women being cops as pride can easily get in the way of stoic duty - it’s obvious she went into “i am going to win mode.” When male cops act this way it is even more of a disgrace. He should be ashamed.
The man who was awarded a judgement against the police is for physical and emotional damages. Also to send a message about to not be an a- hole to citizens they are supposed to protect.
He also probably had medical bills.
The reason he called her a Tyrant is because in the USA the 1st Amendment specifically allows citizens the right to freedom of assembly and amongst other things to prevent people from Tyranny. So he mentioned it as he knew his 1st Amendment rights were being ignored in that specific way. Its very important that the police DO NOT have the right to simply search people when there is not a reasonable and articulable crime as without that requirement you are subject to a Tyrannical Government who can search anyone without cause.
He didn't call her a tyrant, he simply asked her if she was one, and she said that yes she was.
I keep seeing people saying he called her a tyrant, which is wrong. go back and listen.
@@terrencemcginnis7221 I am not going back and listening, he used the word specifically as it is mentioned in the 1st amendment I "Paraphrased" but its good enough, not a fkn exam
You have to be in shape after Police Academy but once you're hired you can eat as many donuts as you like.
There are plenty of cops who don't even know the laws they are supposed to be enforcing, and after years of operating like idiots, violating people's rights, they finally run into a citizen who knows their rights, like that blind guy.
Cities that have cops like that need to be sued for millions until they get the message.
Most cops are educated enough these days, but there are lots out there who don't know, or don't care enough to do the job right. Some cops are corrupt, and some are just plain stupid for not even knowing the law.
I say sue the living shit out of any town or cop that violates your rights.
If you live somewhere where this kind of crap is standard operating procedure, get out the cameras and start sueing the idiots.
The city or town pays for lawsuit compensation, if it came out of police pension fund things would change.
The last drunk cop/lieutenant is like "And I'm not losing my career either" Well he should have thought of that before he got drunk and got behind the wheel.
We had a Mayor's son get pulled over for drunk driving and after the officers realized it was the Mayor's son they cancelled the ticket they were supposed to give him and helped drive him home.
It turned into a year long fiasco with a senior police officer resigning after 30 years of service and the mayor's son ultimately drunk driving again and hitting a couple vehicles and pedestrians at a sporting event.
yeah those are bad cops, hope they get fired and charged
99.5 is correct
nah@@jovanedwards3589
Unfortunately, in the United States of America, we do not teach patrol officers in constitutional law. It is literally a 1 week class.
Amazing how many errors you can pack into 2 sentences, congrats.
The problem with these idiotic cops is that they will be sued but it's the tax payers that get stuck paying these huge judgements, not the cops who violated rights. They should take the money from their retirement accounts. Even after losing their jobs, they will move away and get a job being a cop in some other town as long as they don't have a felony conviction. Know your rights, don't answer questions, don't agree to searches. Yes, it's a pain in the ass to deal with but you'll be better off in the long term.
They protect each other so you need to protect yourself. That cop telling the other cop to be quiet and not answer questions is evidence of that. They would never do that for anyone else. Their goal is to lock you up regardless of innocence or guilt. These cowards have a power fetish. They are mostly the kids that were picked on in school and now they are getting their revenge.
Plenty of good cops out there but they know who the bad ones are but do nothing about it, which makes them complicit , in my opinion.
I am a huge fan of mandatory body cams!
When the cop said arrest the blind man for having a sassy mouth I was livid so fast thought I'd have a stroke
The "hold on we have cards" was a very nice way for the officer to make sure that guy got the information requested without stepping on the toes of the other officer. And the disappointing look said I'm sick of this bs, I'm not risking my career for you.
I think she was also letting the guy know the officer was lying.
In the first clip, the guy was in the right, he did nothing wrong. The police had no right to just stop him. In the USA we know and respect our rights m
Idk about y’all but I find an officer answering yes after being asked if they’re a tyrant to be far more problematic than the question.
You have to be fit to be a cop over here too, it's just when you become one they don't fire you if you don't stay
Only physically fit. Mentally fit, however, lol.
@@profanepersonality that's all relative, many departments require physical and mental health checkups it just isn't across the board federally as the cops aren't federal.
The high damage award to the man that was kicked is also supposed to be a deterrent for the person to not do it again, but this breaks down when the cop is not actually the one paying for it. In lawsuits like this, if found to be guilty, they are supposed to pay for the "compensatory damages" which are actual medical and other bills directly related to the crime/tort as well as for any permanent injury or loss of body parts, and the "punitive damages" which are meant to be a punishment and deterrent for the offending party to not do it again and can be based on the wealth of the guilty party. That is why some seemly small things can become large lawsuits.
The veteran was arrested for "Contempt of Cop".
I also think when the drunk officer got pulled over the other cops where trying to tell him to shut up at first to look out 4 him.
I know it's pretty minor, but the amount of times I see a cop turn on their lights just to blow through an intersection...only to shut them off right after, drives me nuts.
As for the physical aspect of being a cop, the test is fairly difficult...but you only have to pass it once. Most young cops are in absolutely amazing shape...the older ones, not so much haha
In this day and age it seems like the primary function of law enforcement is to give some of the dumbest people in society a job.
When I was on summer break in college an old friend who was a cop came to pick me and a friend up to go out to a bar. It was quickly clear he was already waisted and started driving like a crazy person saying he could get away with it. We got pulled over when he was going like 70 in a 35 on the wrong side of the road. The cop who pulled us over asked if I’d been drinking. When I said no, he just told the guy to get in the back seat and told me to drive him home. Nothing else came of it. He bragged the whole way home about it. I never hung out with him again and I’ve always wondered how many cops get with sh*t like that.
They all take a hypocritic oath.
@@terrencemcginnis7221haha. Unfortunately so true.
I'm not saying cop's always shoot. First but it does happen
The cops aren’t the problem. It is FRATERNITY (do my brother no harm) that is the problem
@@fanuvgamez8754 Sometimes the cops are the problem, and it’s the problem of all cops who turn a blind eye.
Hes lucky they didn't shot him when he pulled that cane out. Serious
Please you watch too much cnn
No i know this for sure. I' know this happens my cousin son wreath for his insurance card and was shot just last year.
Plus I don't watch cnn
You don't just move without telling them.
The cop was fired
I daz is very pro cops and I don’t feel negative towards cops I know a lot of good ones but after watching enough of videos like this it makes you second guess them when approached
That last one bugged me the worse.
My dad was a cop for 35 years. This was before body cams. I couldn't count how many times he was escorted home drunk by his cop buddies when they stopped him while driving drunk. He did the same thing for his friends too. Now that there are body cams, they can't get away with it as much as they once did.
No offence, but that doesn't paint a very good picture of the kind of cop your father and his cop buddies were.
I now trust cops even less if that was possible.
@@1024laf reminds me of a body cam video with similar situation to this one, officer or sheriff pulled over for DUI.. starts asking multiple times to just get a ride home instead of an arrest and the arresting officer says, "you know I can't do that.. it's not like back in the day." [implied: 'the day before body cams']
so your dad and his cop buddies are scumbags?
Which shows you why they acted the way they did. When they know you don't have any evidence against them they can get away with whatever they want.
These cops kept their jobs in the first clip - even the one who’s done this before. Shameful. And the blind man wasn’t wrong when he recognized a tyrant.
Florida... That is all. Smh lol
😂😂😂😂😂
"He called me a tyrant 😟" isnt an arrestable offense
If I were the first guy, I'd be smilin thinkin about how I'm gonna spend all that money I'm gettin.
He can call the cop whatever he wants .. freedom of speech
No that’s not how our law works. They had no right to search him or ask his name. He isn’t committing a crime. He was right to remind her of that. He answered her question and she continued. That’s on her which is why it’s apart of this compilation. Period.
2:30 - its not a crime to own a gun, and the suspicion is quickly gone when they find out there is no gun, so no crime couldve been committed, and therefore - they cant ask for ID
Officer David Duke...irony!
14:44 this are the best Officer 🏆👍🏼☺️: we have Cards!🤨
They were very wrong. This happens often in certain neighborhoods. It causes additional stress and financial problems for people who are already struggling.
Being arrogant isn't a crime. If he is blind, he might have been able to see they were actually police.
I lived across the street to a married cop couple. They would always have parties of their fellow cops. There would be drunk driving, fights in the street. Neighbors called the police but no one was ever arrested. The couple would get into terrible fights and at times domestic violence on the women cop. It was so bad. The couple ended in divorce but even then the husband would come back and cause problems. Finally she moved away, all was quiet again.
Yes the last one lost his job
That first guy's knowledge beatdown of constitutional rights is something they should teach at school.
They do. You didn't study the Bill of Rights, the Constitution, or any civics in school? They started teaching us the basics in 2nd or 3rd grade, and by Middle-school (if you paid attention), they had covered it all pretty deeply.
Yes alot of the officers look like they have had to many donuts
He got arrogant because what's in his pocket is none of here business, cop or otherwise.
They would have had the cop at the end tased by now if he was a person not gettin out 💀💀💀💀
Daz loves the taste of the boot!!!
When we hire cops, we hire people. people have issues. covering it up is a preference and not a responsibility.
Some states its called a (no id check)
In 1 of the clips the cops are giving different orders at the same time. One cop is saying "put your hands up and turn around," and the other is saying "put your hands up and come forward." So which one do you listen to bf one puts a bullet in you bc you didn’t do what one of them said?
If two cops are telling you to surrender in different ways do you know what you should do? Just get on the ground, that's where they want you anyway, don't do that 'Well dad told me i could Mom!' bs
Even if he didn't cal her a tyrant, she was still going to detain him. It doesn't matter with cops in the USA.
He didn't call her a tyrant, he simply asked her if she was one, and she said that yes she was.
I keep seeing people saying he called her a tyrant, which is wrong. go back and listen.
@@terrencemcginnis7221 I didn’t say he did. I was repeating what Darren thought she said, did you watch the whole video before commenting?
I found this 37 minutes after it was posted-first, cool. Second, nice
02:37 While it may not make the officer's day go better, arrogance, "showing attitude" are neither crimes nor probable cause in the US. This whole "just forgo your rights and kowtow to the officer so they feel better" is an impossibly stupid outlook here in the states. She suddenly rolled up on an older legally blind guy minding his own business walking down the sidewalk and tried to meet his annoyance with her own power tripping. Supervisor did the same. Extremely unprofessional. Cops are servants of the public, trained to de-escalate, if possible, and she and her supervisor did the exact opposite, in the end acting as mini-"tyrants" as he suggested previously.
Where’s the daughter that looks like she’s in pain when she laughs?
@mem1701movies Where are your manners?
I love your reaction videos. And I whole heartedly agree with you on the cops not being treated the same, they should be. Especially the last one. But the first guy in this video, was doing NOTHING wrong. And he's an American that knows his rights. Which you Brits don't have the same rights as an American citizen. He was absolutely right to call them a Tyrant. We don't put with that shit.
Her and her boss violated MULITPE rights GUARANTEED in the U.S. Constitution. They both should have been fired and arrested themselves.
BTW if it was a gun. He's allowed to have that - it's called the 2nd Amendment. Open carry is legal everywhere.
The US has a lot of donut eating cops.I wish the police had to be a certain weight over here.
There’s some pretty good auditor videos on YT, but there’s also some really bad ones too. It’s basically people pushing boundaries while remaining completely lawful in their actions. Most have a title like “cops take the walk of shame” but like I said, there’s some of these “auditor” guys that are disrespectful and disgusting.
My favorite clip is these cops get called because two auditors are filming in public, (which is perfectly legal) and when the cops walk up to ask them questions the two guys completely ignore them and start talking about the Taco Bell menu and both cops just end up walking away. 😂
$650000 is actually NOT enough money, Daz. It’s not just about what the citizen victim deserves, but what the pig police deserve - as a message and deterrent that shows then such vile tyrannical behavior will not be tolerated by we, the people.
The problem is cops have something called "qualified immunity." They can't be personally sued for things they do while on duty. That $650,000 doesn't come from the cop, it comes from our tax dollars. It doesn't hurt the cop whatsoever.
The cop tht was drunk prolly woulda been let go if we didn’t have cams now
The fact they tell other officers to not say anything else and trying to protect them and close the door, but will gladly try to coerce statements from non cop individuals in all types of dirty ways is why you can’t ever take police in the US serious or should ever that them when in custody just don’t talk, and go from there as simple as that.
you need to cycle american cops through like years more of training. they are so awful. it's not "just a few bad apples" .
These make me so angry I can hardly watch. Notice how much worse the black man was treated.
The last guy did lose his job
I cannot believe people hate and kill police
0:29 Pretty idiotic thing to say…
I see you have a great sense of humour
@@kmcd3020 didn’t seem like much of a joke to me… but maybe that’s because I’m just in a shitty mood but nonetheless, didn’t seem like a joke
@@Austin.Kilgore the smiling and laughter usually is a telltale sign that's it's humorous
Is it the channel or YT deleting comments here?
It’s established in the us constitution police do not have a duty to protect citizens
I didn't know that there was anything in the constitution about police officers.
it's your right to be a bit arrogant to the cops
The reason cops keep doing this is because they get away with it. The first "arrest", for example, it Saif that they were punished and had to do extra training... so their "discipline" is to do the same training that they've already clearly ignored and to get some paid time off at home... since when is a paid vaca a punishment? Lol if someone is a repeat offended like the first cop then they should be fired, end of discussion. Maybe the rest of the cops will be a little more professional if they had real consequences, like all of us working our jobs. Until I see a "good cop" stand up against one of these "rare" bad cops then I'm just going to assume they're all dirty. They're just lazy and like taking illegal shortcuts. Most of them are fat for a reason
After watching the entire video, I didn't hear them mention a single real penalty for any of these cops... just a slap on the wrist and I'm sure they were able to become cops again down the road. This is why they arent respected like they should be in our country. Its hard to when you know that most of them are cowards with guns
Yes, he lost his job as well he should have.
That female cop shouldn’t have been disciplined like that, she had to follow the sergeant’s orders
Nah. That's was all an ego and power trip on both parts. Violating rights are violating rights and she swore an oath to uphold the law. Remember the Nazi soldiers after WW2 said the same thing. That they were just following orders smh....
Wrong! Just like in the military, subordinates DO NOT have to carry out UNLAWFUL orders, and they WILL get punishment if they do carry out an unlawful order. Just like in the Nuremberg Trials in Germany, after WWII, you cannot claim that you HAD TO carry out illegal acts, simply because you were ordered to do so by a superior officer. It is each soldier's responsibility to know which orders are legal, and those which are illegal, and act accordingly. She was just as complicit as her sergeant in that illegal arrest.
She clearly did not know the law in her state. The blind man knew more about it than them two.
Moron
There is a distinct difference between legal and lawful... for a crime to have been committed there must be harm, injury or loss caused. If a poloce officer does not know the difference between legal and lawful then that is equal to fraud.. which carries a prison sentence... It is presumed the masses have consented to statute law since birth.... for statute law to have the force of law you must CONSENT. Consent can be verbal, written or even your ignorance... ignorance is consent... Acts, statutes, codes etc... are not law unless you agree(consent) to them.
You don't not have to be governed, no-one has more authority over you than you and the people you give it to.
I love my country with all my heart but my government can cover up the atrocities of police officers still boggles my mind. No this is not an atrocity some of these rights got violated nobody died. But as an American we have a certain set of beliefs that we believe our government would never do such a thing to us until it happens to us.
If you even believed that then you lived under a rock or in your own little bubble for a long time. I still can't see how some people walk around oblivious even when there is evidence to support the claims. I want to think it's just trolls but i'm starting to think a certain demographic group in the USA just live different lives and don't care about anyone else.
The blind guy sued and won a settlement.