I like the idea of a separation between the real world and the digital world. Once we are gods in the digital world we will start to use it as an actual tool, and we're going to give value to real things once again.
Anyone else feel like most people you know just dont understand how big of a deal all this is? They may have heard of chat gpt or midjourney as a neat contraption. It is terrifying that this will likely be the largest revolutionary technology in human history and a lot of people have no idea whats happening and just how many fields of technology will be completely overhauled.
Absolutely. I tell people this and they seem to believe me their head's nod to and fro, but there's something missing from their reactions. That oh my god phrase. That oh my god reaction. The resultant curiosity. The kind of reaction that sends a clear message that this person is calculating and seeing the implications to what they were just told. It just isn't there for 99% of the people I've told. And I've tried to tell them in different ways to see if different techniques will help them understand. Maybe they just need to see it to believe it. Soon ....
Oh they know and if anything blow it all out of proportion with Fear mongering paranoia. They don't realize AI doesn't think for itself. It has to be guided and prompted for everything it creates. Humans have to do that job. It just makes humans even more middle men than they were before. AIs are intelligent Tools, but still TOOLS!
Completely. We’re creating things to think for themselves that posses the entirety of human knowledge without any of the physical limitations 😂 what could go wrong!?
I don't think there is a single person in this world who understand how big of a deal it is. Even people who are actively working on developing those AI's.
@@Godsfavouriteidiot_ No. We are not teaching them to think for themselves. That's the entire point. We couldn't even if we wanted to because that's vastly beyond our capabilities so far. These are intelligent tools.. we use them, we tell them what to do, they build and predict after we give them a prompt or a design instruction. Its just automated work.
The truth is that everybody wants to be financially independent and live a better life. With savvy investing, an inexpensive lifestyle, and diligent budgeting, this is not difficult to do. I'm glad I realized early on that achieving financial freedom requires hard work.
Investment is a fabulous way to save money for the future as well as a way to generate passive income. Those who make poor mistakes early in life regret them later in life. But, if done alone, investing may be challenging and risky. For this reason, I suggest consulting experts for advice (financial advisors). The difficulty lies in effectively employing it, not just watching videos and reading investing books.
Sincerely, I'm moved by what you said. I have a sizable amount of money that I am willing to invest if given the appropriate knowledge and I am highly interested in investing. My greatest concern is losing money on a bad investment. I'm open to hearing your advice on how to make sensible investments as a result.
Sure, my advisor is Olivia Maria Lucas. In terms of portfolio diversity, she's a genius. You can look her name up on the internet and verify her yourself. She has years of financial market experience plus she is also FINRA & SEC verifiable.
Thank you for this tip. It was easy to find your coach. Did my due diligence on her before scheduling a phone call with her. She seems proficient considering her resume.
there had to be an artist who modeled that sculpture in zbrush at 15:25, so yeah I find that statement disturbing... as if it was a sale argument denying the work of artists :/
Yes but it's a bit misleading. I doubt they simulated each atom or the electronic circuits running the robots. Reality is much more complicated than that. This is still 100%art.
@@zegritch The fact is that your "had to be" is now at best an assumption, as there could have been an AI trained to use ZBrush, prompted by a human, GPT4, or just left to do its own thing entirely. "Hey ZAI, make me something that you think would look good in that empty space in the corner" can absolutely be a reality right now if anyone cares to make it, though of course in general you'd just go for direct generation of the asset.
That game demo could mean something like instead of prewritten dialog trees where you get 2-3 options to choose, we could just use our own microphones to interact with NPCs in a game. That would be mind blowing levels of immersion.
Just a few years ago, I would have said, the hell outta here! Even if it may be possible, it won't be feasible and clunky at best. But now I can see this working out very well. If an AI is trained to access information about gameplay mechanics, map content and lore... no problem.
just what I was thinking. The same idea can apply to ALL our interaction with a game world...some day I think people will look back on how primitive game worlds were in our time because of how much reaction had to be programmed into them. Imagine everything in a game world being real time generated phyisics based action and reaction to the game player's interactions.
Replacing and augmenting human labor is a great thing and should be celebrated.... Unless you live in a capitalist system and you need a job to survive
AI doesn't think. Not really. It's highly guided and then it builds and predicts what we tell them. It's just intelligent Tools. We use the tools. We are far far away still from Singularity level AI that can think all on it's own and consider it's own being. It's very hard to teach AI even how to Bluff.
@@Wolfsheim23 the growth was exponential these last years. We may reach the "singularity"/consioucness level earlier than expected. Also, they talk about multiple ai communicating. They may not need us at some point to be able to reach this level if we give them enough computing power.
There's a thin line AI is treading between making humans empowered and making humans worthless. I feel like there will be a select few who will grab into the power of AI, and use it to attempt to gain control and power over other humans and make them feel worthless.
You have other forms of control which existed and still exist... i would like to see AI taking out the people who rule the world atm, however new ones will take their place and the cycle will continue ...
@@blekienomoregames9312 agreed, but what should NOT happen,but what is easiest to happen, is if the ones in power now take control of AI. This is a time now more than ever for those who the system did wrong to fight back, not to seek vengeance against all of humanity, but only to seek vengeance against the leaders of the current system. In fact, they should do it to fight for the betterment of humanity.
The scariest part is when he says "No artists necessary", we are not realizing that every human beings are going to be replaced by AI sooner than we think.. Today "no artists necessary", soon "no engineers, doctors, lawyers, writers, teachers" necessary...
The farmer and builder have always been more valuable than the doctor or the artist but society decoupled economies long ago. It will return to its natural state eventually.
AI won't stop humans from creating art. We just won't need to make money doing it anymore. Read The Singularity Is Near, it might hep you better understand what I mean.
Do you trust the words of real humans or media or news stories stories now? Do you feel like your data or identity or even your physical body are safe and secure now? I guess the only thing I’m optimistic about is that we lost that stuff a while ago so we don’t have it to lose! Lol Wrap your head around the rate of acceleration once these “ai factories” surpass the limitations we attempt to place on them, when someone uses the same source code and takes said safeguards out! Probably will go from harmless to beyond a hope of reeling it back in faster than it takes two humans to tell each other why they have better political views than the other one (and that usually comes out as little more than a grunt these days)!
Yea so an AI can steal your identity digitally. It can look, sound, and behave like you. It could steal information about you and who knows what else it can do from there
There is no stopping this technology; it either grows in our hands or the hands of the enemy, regardless of whether or not you can make a distinction between the two. If we implement a policy restricting this, we will simply be behind the curb to other countries like China and Russia. Not only that, but we would be trusting that technology to our government solely. It is best in the hands of the people.
I totally agree. I love all the creative outcomes of generative AI and all the new things we see each week but in terms of privacy, quality of outputs, policies there’s way less hype. Seems like the “boring” parts are being elegantly ignored while praising to us the AI future. I don’t tend to think of outcomes like AI becoming evil or whatever Hollywood scenario :D instead it puts more power into even less people’s/companies hands with the abilities to shape and influence the biases or ethics of these models while giving even more power to companies that already have huge data collections or the resources to create them. Also why I tend to only hype myself up for open source projects. (Although these can also turn out bad lol but at least it’s in everyone’s hands). The AI future could very well end up in a centralized dystopia but I’ll stay optimistic 😅 there’s a lot of positive use cases for AI especially in science and research but I don’t see that in personal AI assistants that know everything about your private life controlled and stored by some major tech company..
True, but there's also no one that really comes to mind that I'd feel confident in putting forth competent and thoughtful policy on this stuff currently as-is. And especially no one in a sitting position of elected authority.
@@SadPanda449 its one of those things where big tech will take any opportunities at any costs they can while governments are still wondering how to regulate this kind of stuff. i mean just look how privacy and data was/is exploited with the internet. by facebook, etc. i'm not pessimistic but its an important part of AI evolving and it should not be missed by us nor news outlets, regulators or the companies themself. we put disclaimers on our food and toasters, so put it on AI tools too :D
It's interesting that the "Omniverse" is totally ignoring humans in it's pitch. It's just pitching for ever faster production without them, and why they still have them around in this movie is literally from sentiment of having humans on the production floor. The give-away; they wear classical factory-worker caps, walk around like they are just chillaxing, and never lift a finger to do the real work. It's pretty much post-human and the geste of an era that was already long gone
I think there will still be some humans on the floor just to make sure nothing is catching fire...but yeah about 70-90% unemployment is around the corner which is why I'm such an advocate for a UBI structure.
@@oficado58 I don't see how that solves the issue - I mean sure, for some it will, but there will still be this "tiny" crowd of people who aren't necessarily ok with doing nothing and getting very mediocre money for it. Some people actually have ambition (and like their work, which will be taken away from them).
Did you notice how in his speech he keeps repeating "no artists"? It's baffling how no moral spine / sentiment this guy has :D They literally build their company on gamers and artist. Then it was crypto miners, now it's AI. He's like the epitome of capitalism. And that's how you make money in our world - you have no heart. Trillion dollar evaluation, lets goooo - he's probably hi fiving with Bezos. Capitalism is just terrible really. And there's no alternative either...
@@Perforu Won't the ambitious people have lots of free time to pursue whatever venture they'd like? Perhaps craft made by humans will become a luxury item that people are willing to pay extra for. And the UBI would be an absolute necessity in a society where all work is filled by AI/robots. Otherwise there would be mass famine as the few people owning the large corporations would acquire and keep _all_ the money.
@@K4113B4113 At this point we can only speculate. But I don't see this complete paradigm shift of human superiority going smoothly. I don't think many people realise we are in the process, maybe advanced stages, of creation of a superior being (advanced in a sense that if we reach certain threshold in AGI, AGI will start developing itself - and it will be an exponential growth we won't keep up with). Btw who and with what would buy these luxury goods? People in the AI business? Because most definitely not people with their base income. And what about life of people with base income and stripping away their chance of actually "making it" and becoming rich? Capitalism, while it's a big fat lie, offers people an opportunity to make it happen and become very successful - both in material sense and in career accomplishments. Even if it was false / cynical, there was this hope. People will be stripped of that hope now. I just don't see all of this going smoothly. I think many, many (maybe majority) of people will get exploited and some unimaginably rich people will become unfathomably rich in the process. Masses of people will just get f*cked over, for the benefit of the few rich ones.
It's not much of a stretch to see that AI that creates hardware chips in the future will understand the designs far better than humans, and may even implement hardware backdoors that we cannot find, to exploit later.
That's much harder than what you might think. AI is good at solving a SINGLE problem because on what it's learned, but making an IC is a creative effort. And inside something like a CPU there are tens of thousands of problems being solved. You first have to understand a problem you are trying to solve. Now, considering how HIGHLY guarded the logic diagrams for these processors that have hundreds of millions to billions of transistors in them, I don't know how you TRAIN the AI. Intel could train AI for this, or Nvidia, AMD and a handful of other companies using their own logic diagrams. You teach it how segments of the logic works, which would take years. But then somehow you have to go from, spit out something you have seen, to creating an optimal solution for a creative problem and AI doesn't do this well. Sure it's possible, probably not this century because there are multiple parts of that problem and the main way AI learns is by being fed huge amounts of data, so it would need to be fed huge amounts of logic diagrams and SOMEHOW you train this AI on what each of these diagrams are doing. And there lies the problem AI is good at solving a SINGLE problem but not a creative problem. Sure it can create stuff but not REAL solutions. Like it can make images that are pretty wild and you can even tell it to make an image with X, Y and Z, but it's a SINGLE problem, making an image. So you feed the AI machine hundreds of thousands if not millions of images and this is easy. But now going from this to understanding what billions of transistors in a CPU are doing (which is many thousands of things), and like understanding this for EVERY SINGLE transistor in that circuit. That's the depth of knowledge the AI would need. Yeah, not this century. It could design something simple, but so can humans and we're really good at it.
I work in AI, digital twins etc. Our AI automates the test, rectification and production of a range of aerospace products. When speaking to our development team, I’m troubled by the developments coming down the road in 12, 24, 36 and 60 months. My fear is the job losses and the number of issues from robots being able to diagnose and reset themselves. The software already has some “uncanny” abilities that prompted several meetings with the company's senior leadership. We really need governments or supranational bodies to draw some lines in the sand. Some rules that companies and governments must follow.
There's no stopping this. Even if governments draw lines black markets or other governments will keep pushing the edge of AI and by limiting ourselves we will only fall behind.
@@streetprophet007 To do things not planned once it had gone through its few-shot learning stage. To make decisions it wasn't taught to make as a human might do if they were pushing it's own agenda, but in a more methodical way as it went through iterations.
Just FYI, we already have killer robots. They are called cruise missiles. Since the 1970 we have also had "smart" missiles that decide how to explode in context of a infrared image library (think similar to how ww2 sub captains book to figure out what ship he was looking at) of enemy tanks. Sentry guns that are semi automatic. The human operator just has to "okay" a spotted target. Everything else is automated until it runs out of ammo or battery power. Killer robots do not need to be self aware. That said, an actual self aware robot wouldnt automatically dislike humans. One also has to take into account that similar to computer virus. There will be ai that tries to harm, ala hacking and so on, while also ai trying to defeat or prevent such. The nukes aspect is also not that realistic because such already have more steps to launch. Why? Because modern day transistors can be switched by cosmic rays. Yes, something from the beginning of time as we know it, can actually blue screen your system today if it hits just right.
@@_Jake.From.Statefarm_ Maybe, but it was always our decision to do so. Now we're going to outsource that decision. Maybe we won't. Personally, I am on the optimistic side of the development. :)
The most important thing that should be on everyone mind currently should be to invest in different sources of income that doesn't depend on the government. Especially with the current economic crisis around the word. This is still a good time to invest in various stocks, Gold, silver and digital currencies.
@@Adukwulukman859 I'm new to crypto and stock investing; My $200k portfolio is now down to $55k. "How can I profit from the current market?" I mean, I've heard of folks getting up to $250k in a couple weeks during this downturn, and I'd like to know how.
I diversified my $400K portfolio across multiple market with the aid of an investment advisor, I have been able to generate over $900k in net profit across high dividend yield stocks, ETF and bonds in few months.
The investment-advisor that guides me is Laura Marie Ray, she popular and has quite a following, so it shouldn't be a hassle to find her, just search her
As a writer, I think AI can be good to improve textual information or stories, but I also see that it could eliminate my job just as easily if it is taught how to account for human emotions.
Using the 2D to 3D AI along with the new Apple VR/AR headset would be a surreal experience, and it's crazy that it's an achievable thing in the near future
Artists are, of course, directly affected by this. All of their passion and desires will be snuffed out as soon as the technology gets good enough to fully replace them. But eventually everyone will be affected. All of us, regardless of our goals look at astronauts, musicians, actors, painters, philosophers, anyone on the breaking edge of human potential, as a form of motivation in their own lives. When we replace what makes it worth being a human with technology, we lose the reason to exist. I’m really scared for our future generations.
If we did that, we never would have invented fire. I mean, a fire can burn down the forest around you. Maybe we shouldn't have done that either. But then you wouldn't be in TH-cam comments, talking out of your asshole. Wait, I changed my mind, your right, let's go back to caves so I don't accidentally read more word vomit.
the probability that we are in a simulation is higher then not, in a pure mathematical sense. There is a small chance of something being the first event, an infinitesimally small chance. The chance that you are doing something that someone has already done or that an event is not the very first time event of its kind, is very large. Combining these odds together it would be like a 98% chance we are in some kind of simulation already. and a 99% chance we are a simulation IN a simulation.
@@forposterity4031 if our existence is a “simulation” it would mean it is not actual reality.. i think its more that actual reality has a lot of similarities to a computer simulation in how it comes into being. Like it is maybe mathematically created, but isn’t fake like calling it a simulation implies
i dont think so. because just think of how many atoms are a hair folicle. How much calculation does it take to track every atom in a 1 hair.. how many hairs exist on Earth..thats just one item. cells and molecules all interacting in real time.. the sun... well, hmmm, it must be a some kind of simulation.. since space is expanding. this means its inside something. its just too vastly complex to understand at the moment. Maybe by the turn of the century scientists will have figured out this natural phenomena simulation called physics. its just not a simulation our feeble human brains could make on a computer.. its a simulation of supernatural spiritual sorts of unbounding energy and life forces.
It’s kinda like watching the planning for the Manhattan Project except Oppenheimer is like “we will put one of these in every household! Every child will have a factory to make these!” 😂😂😢
Question is are we human beings going to live better and easier life due to this advancements? It seems we have the technology's to make everyone's life easy, but in practice I still don't see it. Most humans are still struggling to make ends meet and even more now.
Precisely. And if you have any sense you know that this technological revolution will increase the divide between the classes exponentially. There will be select benefits to three super rich and a few other select people that have their quality of life improved medically, for example. But this doesn't mean that it is a net good for the majority of people, if not disastrous. It is, however, inevitable.
I guess we will need to ask AI how to make an optimal economic system... lol. The reality is that our current system will not work in the future. Currently humans are paid on either productivity or innovation. We could effectively end world hunger and homelessness but at the same time start all kinds of class wars, not to mention what the future of weaponry will become...
The video is literally about this dystopian end. So bright and cheery for the harbinger of the apocalypse. This literally will change anything and everything and NVIDIA is, here, selling it. Selling. It. For all the excitement they have, and I believe they genuinely believe this is 100% positive, they haven't asked who they are ultimately selling it to. Replacement of autoworkers with robots created minor economic disturbance until the autoworkers adjusted or found new work. AI isn't going to disrupt one career. It's going to disrupt all of them. Capitalism isn't required to die because of this shift but imagine the economic dislocation when all workers become redundant at the same time. I wish I was overreacting. Obviously, not everyone will be laid off. It didn't happen to autoworkers, after all. But it will happen to everyone. The AI, like factory robots, multiplies the amount of production one person can create. Demand isn't going rise as fast a the potential growth in production. So, if the AI multiplies the production of 100 workers by 1.2 , the business can do the work of 102 workers with just 85. This video isn't about multipliers of a mere +0.2. I don't know what it feels like to the rest of you but I saw +4,+9, higher. When one architect can do the work of five, when one burger flipper can do the work of 10, on middle manager can do the work of fifteen, one peon can do the work of twenty, the job market gets bad. When it all happens to everything, everywhere, all at once... I leave that to the readers' imaginations.
Imagine a cyberpunk game with randomly generated cities, randomly generated characters, that you're able to talk to using your microphone, and the AI creates possible outcomes for every quest.
I seriously feel like this is a keynote about Skynet. Even the new GPUs, APUs, whatever they're called, are blocky like the Skynet piece from the T100.
I think your point on that idea because look now we never new this virus come out from movies if true say goodbye to your job AI will take over your jobs might not take jobs today or tomorrow give few years you see.
It's strange how this technological launch doesn't follow the typical pattern that brings joy, but quite the opposite, it leaves you feeling empty. It's sad and exciting at the same time, but no matter how impressive and advanced it may seem, Jensen is the most thrilled and happy about this whole matter, knowing that his chips will power all this new technology. However, for the rest of the people, it will always be seen as an attack on who we are and what we have built so far.
Leon it will be seen like an attack if you are a pessimist. I'm an eternal optimist and I'm already loving what it can do for me. I also know that I am good enough that it can't replace me.
I think most game developers will have to shift their work-style towards using AI to be able to do their work at an optimized rate. I don't think AI is taking over by its own will, but the AI is the technology that developers will have to transition to in order to optimize productivity.
can't wait for the technological breakthrough that allows for a card with 12gb vram without costing an arm and a leg... memory and the demand for said memory has been growing while the vram size has remained stagnant even among most of the higher end cards. All that's changed is the vram type.
This sounds like the beginning of the matrix, and people will plug into it with same great exuberance and excitement just like the person doing the demonstration on stage.
He’s so excited for this technology to grow in leaps and bounds. His job may be secure but what about all the people this will displace by taking their livelihood away from them. I myself, as a computer graphic artist am scared.
I wouldn't worry too much. During the 1980's we had exactly the same spiel and trillions of dollars went into AI for very little advancement (things like backpropagation were more incidental rather than as a consequence of that funding). In recent times there have been some interesting new connection models optimised for silicon but nothing that I would call revolutionary. ChatGPT is basically a traditional learning and recall network that has an extraordinary large learning set - there is nothing 'intelligent' about it - if you imagine a copyist - then that's what ChatGPT and a lot of modern AI is. So what has changed since 1980? Computer Graphics and computing speeds have got fantastically better - what does that mean - it means that visualisation is many orders of magnitude better and so the sales pitch is to put no fine a point on it - wondrous (and NVIDIA is one of the leading players in that). They are pitching for what? Applications -maybe, but they are pitching more for Government Funding (same as always) for prospective research - they will be extracting trillions of dollar of Tax-Payers monies and concessions (and all the Governments around the world will be told they have to do the same to keep up). This is a grab for money - something wondrous may emerge from it - but I would wager it dies out after a while, before being reawoken in another 15-20 years with much the same promise. They are also pushing (like many large companies) for the Server model - the Utilities business model. If the whole basis of computing is that processors get faster and memory more massive and the whole thing runs on less power - why then would you be pushing for a centralised model of computing that required massive power just to run - answer: It makes more money for the companies concerned. As a graphic artist - I'd be suing as a group - the visualisation tools aren't creating new scenes from innate intelligence they are using textual associations taught on existing scenes generated by persons like yourself and sometimes quaint stylisation schemes to then generate 'novel' looking images. Google made a business by stealing other peoples data and refashioning it as its own - the same thing is going on today with AI. Novel human contributions are still the genesis of all things meaningful that relate to human beings.
@@frankyyaggabot6222 Wrong. AI has already displaced millions and millions of jobs in almost every field of work possible. McDonalds, grocery stores, warehouses, coding, production and manufacturing, customer service, teaching, art, banking, website design, video production, surveying, marketing, blah blah blah
@@Greedxgreed No it hasn't. Algorithms implemented in Procedural Code have changed work environments broadly speaking since the 1970s. There is no AI (that I'm aware of - and here we are speaking Connectionist Models) that have displaced any workers in a meaningful way. Things like Pattern Recognition have made some tasks faster - but in most cases still need human supervision. Fuzzy Logic (or Petri-Net like graphs for Chatbots and the like) may have replaced some service jobs - but most consumers (like myself) find them an annoyance and actually turn away from companies that employ these.
@@frankyyaggabot6222 Wrong again. 12 self-checkout tills replaces at MINIMUM one cashier, and that is me being as simple as possible to spell it out for you in the most elementary way. Every single large business you know worldwide has already used AI to create an image instead of paying a humane to create the image for them. Whether it be for a logo, a thumbnail, a poster, a video. Entry-level workers are absolutely 100% affected and are already displaced by AI in some way or another, and you disputing this FACT is delusion born of boomer privilege.
Imagine ~ AI to be able to instantly scan and reassemble the image of the human body in 3d - virtual mode perfectly -- say of a person on the operation table, perhaps in need an emergency heart by pass operation (or any other operation...like an eye operation), and the twin AI fed all the information many miles away to a surgeon from another country, relays the information back and forth. The surgeon could work with instrumental hands via a robotic system, which is also involved with communicating to the other remote operating table, where a set of robotic arms and lasers, inner cams performs the main part of the operation, that, and with the help of an in house AI already having an high degree of medical knowledge at the doctor's end, can act as an assistant during the operation. In other words, a global operation table! Oh that would be so cool!
Keep up the good thoughts! if people would be firmly fixed on noble and positive ideals such as this, the technology would undoubtedly be a good thing. It's just another form of power and how we use it will decide our fate.... sadly on the other side there are people attempting to make more effective killing machines.
@@AlexAlcyone yep, then comes the killings machines that have to be made to kill those killing machines, then more killing machines have to be made to come after those killing machines, then comes the rouge super smart AI nano bots, which in turn decides to eat everybody, hence what the planet earth will be left with, is, the survival of the smallest.
@@benzonex I see a future of fewer gatekeepers. No more spending tens of thousands of dollars on school and years to learn design tools. Access for everyone to create beautiful things on demand. In the not so distant future these softwares will be as common as video editing software is today. Open creation is the opposite of the death of art and pleasure.
I think the audience is so stunned that they cannot really take in what Jensen is saying. A lot of groundbreaking announcements in science and technology have historically been too much for people to handle (or believe) until later.
idiot this happened in 1980 this is a small leap in AI like fucking tensor cores did nothing special and most RT dosent work good at all correctly for stable 60fps so gose for the AI idea its a propaganda hoax its about loosing millions of jobs at the cost of a Ai system
There's is a problem with current AI, and we won't solve it for quite some time (decades) and that is the AI doesn't *know* what it is talking about. It knows what *it* is. But it doesn't *know" Current AI won't know what to answer when you give it a picture of a kitchen with a table in it, and in the picture there's a hand pointing at a table, you ask a AI what *it* is and it won't be able to answer. Current AI is essentially a parrot with quick access to a library of information, it can match the questions to the correct answer but it won't know or have any understanding. That is why AI is overrated and we won't have the technology to overcome this step for quite some time.
I am literally stunned speechless. These advances are incredible, seems like we are now finally at the point that if you can imagine it then AI can do it
Very soon we will be able to watch our own movies using prompts. NO need for actors or filmmakers if you can prompt AI to make a movie with you as the main character slaying dragons. Crazy time to be alive.
@@francois9747 AI Shows us how brain dead most people are. IF your caliber of work is so low AI can replace it you deserve it and for the most part it is.
I may be naïve, but it feels like we have disabled the breaks right after topping a hill, all the while knowing there are several wheels already off the tracks. Let's hope the engineers of this train are prepared for the blind curves up ahead.
26:45 “Nova cannot tell that it isn’t in the real world, it thinks it’s in the real environment, sensors works, physics works, it can navigate itself, everything is physically based…“ …hmmmm
I think the Amish got it right. All this "advancement" is making us sick and miserable. We're addicted to entertainment just to prevent ourselves from feeling how meaningless our life has become.
I have to agree really, I did quite a bit in 3D early on a really enjoyed it….. then I sort of slowly lost interest and haven’t touched it now for a decade. My life is in a much better playing with nature on my hobby farm and doing nature photography . Although seeing this real time rendering is making me somewhat keen to have a tinker with it again.
This reminds me that it looks like we're laying the computational AI background foundations for the future Holadeck technology. The only thing that is probably far off still is materializing data into transitory tactile physical objects that can be interacted with.
should be possible in a few decades, the trick is not to materialize data into real objects, but to manipulate your nervous system into thinking it touches something, propably via implants under your skin or directly into your brain
yes conversational AI has suddenly come a long way. Spatial sim might take a similar leap. With light quality VR glasses you could go a long way with a highly articulated robot with some electro controllable surfaces that could vary firmness and thermal properties so you could touch a cold hard glass surface or a soft pillow. It only needs to counter your body, it doesn't need to create a large volume in tiny details. The surfaces could be called touch matrix. Like a display for touch.
As a former screenwriter I would love to feed my old screenplays into AI and have it make a movie that I can upload to TH-cam or elsewhere. That is probably the only way they will be produced, so that would be fun.
Incredible both what AI has allowed them to be capable of and at what speed. Almost as impressive as how quickly they got the Trillion Dollar Valuation 😅
😂😂😂. That valuation is absolutely absurd TBH and I am a huge fan of NVIDIA - I even have ML systems with 8+ gpus and gaming systems with their newest flagship models as well. 230 P/E???
@@brandonb.288 They have a Trillion Dollar market cap, their stock is up 40% for the last month. That's even after news of their video cards sitting on shelves.
The generative AI conversation thing is wild. I've played video games for pretty much the entirety of my life and this is something I imagined happening decades later than it has. It's amazing to see how much AI is changing technology in pretty much every medium out there, and I think it will completely change video games forever
@@rg5312 I think I definitely was more excited at a younger age, but I also wasn't an adult 10-12 years ago. Brains work differently over that large of a time period. I guess now it's more fascination and fulfillment of previous excitement than actual excitement. Regardless I look forward to seeing where this goes. Other applications of AI are pretty concerning, but this is one I'm supportive of
@@rg5312 more now than 10 years ago, less than 20. but without personal biases, now is a more exciting time to look to the future, tbh. AI is going to change games forever. what i'm not looking for is microsoft integrating it on windows to spy, control and profile everything about you and your computer, and shit like that
Seems to me that most of the Ai improvements are about money and power. We could use that computing power to tackle REAL problems right? Remarkable how its not been used in that way....
@@behindel In order to cure cancer you would need to stimulate an entire human being protein folding in all to be able to accurately find and fix the bad “DNA” and then improve DNA Repair proteins and protections as well as most Anti-Cancer
They are using current AI in medicine. It's sped up the task of protien folding by hundreds of times and already led to new medicine hitting the shelves. How about you try googling this stuff before complaining
I was on the cutting edge of everything computer and graphics card related in my teens early 20s. Now I can't even bring myself to get excited about this amazing technology because it all feels soulless and generic. Gaming was a way to escape the real world, now they are trying to turn gaming into the real world.
Try to think about all the positive impacts. Even if you do not want to do it, maybe you need to. Just because a large group is looking to make great graphics applications doesn't mean that is where all the scientific attention is. A long list of benefits will come along with a long list of downsides. AI has the potential to elevate so much suffering and keep so many people from dying.
@@patrickmeyer2598 "Anything "ultimate" put into the hands of human beings will naturally tend towards evil." This statement indicates your belief that humans tend towards evil. They disagree with that part, so they don't worry about humans being powerful. At least, they believe that the majority of good people will stop the minority of bad guys. That's my perspective anyway. I was pretty disappointed with the overwhelming negativity in the comments. There's this new tech that will greatly increase human efficiency and productivity, but all they see is Skynet taking their jobs.
@@MadnessTW it is less about people losing jobs for me and more about what the elite want and have been planning that worries me. If you pay attention to what they are doing and what they tell you out in the open, you would realize that they want to reduce the human population by 95%. Like always, they use our creativity, ingenuity, and genius and then spit us out. While I dont have the best faith in humanity as a whole, it is the elite psychopaths that are always in control that cause me concern. Scary enough I understand how they feel. 95% of humanity really isn't needed. They don't add anything of significant value to the world. I'm just not a psychopath wanting to eliminate them.
I am 100% opposed to AI modifying the Audio video signal from transmit to receive for most conditions... the last thing we need is more deep fakes. The rest of the tech is fairly amazing.
Yet gamers love to beat on nvidia claiming that's a stock that's just riding the AI bubble, because dlss far etc aren't that great, which will go the way of crypto in a few years, and then nvidia will come back to making GPUs for them. Not really seeing or understanding the scope of AI
@@Dhruv1223 i see no problem with that. AI is betting on the future. and nvidia is doing just that. while gamers want a gpu that just works, instead of investing in future prospects.
If AI is in our games people will find game breaking ways to exploit them. That should be fun to watch. There will be a series of words to say to corrupt your opponents weapons loadout or it can help you with your homework depending how powerful they make it. Peoples AI companion will become their gf/bf since the dialog will be convincing. Will be a different era
yes I believe you. A different era.. with styles and flavors of companion AIs.. your freak desires of a human expanded and continuously revised every time you get bored until you are doing the most bizarre activities to find attraction and fufill your evolving libido... peanut butter jelly time!!! LOL
This is actually a good lesson on how for video games, you need more than just dialogue to make a scene engrossing. The cook behind the counter was as lifeless, maybe moreso, than the NPCs we have now. How often when you go into a restaurant IRL, do you see someone standing there staring off into space? A bit of animation of them doing their work would have gone a long way. The voice was mind-numbingly boring as well.
the Video Reconstruction into 3D is just a gateway towards having full body 3D holographic interface like star wars. stand in your call area/AR zone and then have a series of lights that intersect on the other end to produce a 3D image and play over speakers. Just like we have facial recognitions we could push it to try to recognize a face and your body along with it so it can also stream and rematerialize it for visualization. a bit like those Hatsune Mike Holo Concerts or like what they did at Coachella this year(2023)
Hi andrew... love your vids Didn t know you are into tech. Has anyone tought about an ai garndeing software? It has knwoledge about the scpecies that grow best in your area and if you give it some data (geo, garden size...) it will give you a full plan. What to grow, when to sow, how to arrange the beds, where to plant trees, support species .... It would be cool to use ai to solve real life problems as well and not only improve our production capabilities
What a privileged view of the world. The industry is directly tied to minimizing suffering in the world. I don't know about you, but I cant single-handedly build a pulse oximeter, a water pump, or a hospital.
The problem with the game example is the ai is pretty likely to generate dialogue that doesn't match up with the actual rest of the game, like "I heard there's x at y" but x is actually at z or y doesn't exist
Exactly that. For general chit chat it's great, but specific information will be difficult or impossible to reliably generate. There will need to be another layer that the AI accesses for that information, instead of using what's contained in the model.
Simply WOW! Not just for gaming but the possibilities for VR and IRL scene's. Walk into a hospital, talk to a robot that can instantly look up everything, put it together and get you where you need to be in less than 10 seconds and predict outcomes etc. AI Rules and companies like this that work it to produce a better future, you guys are the best!
This is so impressing that we have no idea hwhat this can change in the next years. We are just in the beginnings of a new aera. I think this will change everything in the IT industry. I can remember when I saw 1992 the first time the internet and I knew within a very short time that it will change the world. But this is far bigger. And it seems NVidia knows what they are doing.
This makes me extremely happy! i have been working on a game over the last 23 years im just not good at coding.. so its all written down in books i have been told by so many people, i could never make it, as it would cost so much money, and would need a team of hundreds to make the game world.. all i want is to create my Game, where players interact with NPCs like humans and the NPC react based on our actions and when we accept quests for EG we actually talk the world and the NPC change base on players interaction's and choices and put this in a MMO a true MMORPG sandbox. This Video is so close to what i have invision all those years ago.
I don't want a company providing advertising perfectly tuned to my personality. I want information from multiple sources providing accurate comparisons. This technology will assist companies and politicians to become more persuasive, at the expense of providing honest, complete information.
Can't wait for a Bethesda game using the ai dialoge and random quest generation. We will have some epic games in 5-10 years. I just hope that this technology is attainable for indie devs and smaller companies as well, that's where the good games are these days.
@@puppergump4117 Lol, so being concerned about the future of humanity re: AI is "quaking in fear?" Anyone who doesn't clap like an idiot and squeak "sO KeWl BrO" is part of the problem. Lol, tell us all about these "safeguards." Oh that's right, you have absolutely no clue what you're talking about.
Question is : Who will own that AI supercomputer and how can it be verified against false/true comparison? Unless it will be an open source , and even so, how can it be trusted? Dark times are coming, because it will result in degrading human knowledge in general and heavy dependence on mentored thinking. Yet another problem would be if AI will free itself from the control of that owners.😂
Or when you realise that we were never in control,this is all just for a show and the real thing is already cooked..some alien inteligence is overtaking the world but we cant see,we think its our invention :D
The bar for entry is much lower than you would expect. If every single person in the US had a Local AI 1/1000 the size of something that Invidia could cook up, the gap isn't actually that wide. We must maintain our autonomy and the right to self-defense, as that is where AI is headed very soon. These programs don't actually require a huge amount of computational power for what they do; it's just the programs that need to be optimized. If the government bans local AI because they could potential be too dangerous, that is when you should start worrying a lot.
But what if that other country develops a seriously dangerous AI and hands its military over to it - allows it to design, build and autonomously man the armed forces? Won't your nation be forces to do the same lest they be easily overwhelmed by something that is so single minded, has perfect C&C, has no morality, follows every order blindly and makes every decision from the very highest commander to the lowliest piece of tech in the field instantly and all in a connected fashion? What happens when this force unplugs itself from those that control it... everything keeps coming back to dystopian sci-fi brought to life.
One question: “WHY??!!” For all the potentially negative and extremely adverse events this will allow. So creating art is just computer bs now?! You people are so proud of yourselves. Why and what doesn’t matter to you. Nor will shame when it does turn bad.
The realistic graphics in the games makes people to believe, that simplified world rules in the games are adaptable in the real life. I have seen this in my brother who has very little ability to solve really open problems. Reality is not a setup of problems designed to solve in advance.
💰 Want my AI research and stock picks? Let me know: tickersymbolyou.com/ai
No content on that page
@@alfadog67 And people still don't believe that there is a creator the programmer
@@alfadog67 Are you blocking scripts on your browser? I see a few questions and an optin
@@strikers1985 That might explain it. I'm using FF with Privacy Badger.
site doesnt work for me either i guess, jjust like a slideshow of some mediocre screensavers tbh.
As AI deepfake improves, the greater the demand will become for in-person meetings for anything requiring any degree of trust
Great call out. Meeting in person is the new Authenticator
A good thing
If we're really lucky, A.I. may render the net unusable.
Along comes the 100% human like avatar that perfectly matches the owner in every detail...and its inevitable imposters lol.
I like the idea of a separation between the real world and the digital world. Once we are gods in the digital world we will start to use it as an actual tool, and we're going to give value to real things once again.
Ai is an incredible thing and I can't wait to see how corporations use it to make our lives worse.
well after the worldwide riots against 5g and covid, expect it to be even worse than skynet.
Nice lol
Yep, like Joe Biden hiring 87.000 IRS agenst and arming them to the teeth!
Thats why they make wars, pLandemies, and vaccines...to get rid os us.
Just wait until the government uses it to audit you for that $5 your grandma gave you that you didn't report.
Anyone else feel like most people you know just dont understand how big of a deal all this is? They may have heard of chat gpt or midjourney as a neat contraption. It is terrifying that this will likely be the largest revolutionary technology in human history and a lot of people have no idea whats happening and just how many fields of technology will be completely overhauled.
Absolutely. I tell people this and they seem to believe me their head's nod to and fro, but there's something missing from their reactions. That oh my god phrase. That oh my god reaction. The resultant curiosity. The kind of reaction that sends a clear message that this person is calculating and seeing the implications to what they were just told. It just isn't there for 99% of the people I've told. And I've tried to tell them in different ways to see if different techniques will help them understand. Maybe they just need to see it to believe it. Soon ....
Oh they know and if anything blow it all out of proportion with Fear mongering paranoia. They don't realize AI doesn't think for itself. It has to be guided and prompted for everything it creates. Humans have to do that job. It just makes humans even more middle men than they were before. AIs are intelligent Tools, but still TOOLS!
Completely. We’re creating things to think for themselves that posses the entirety of human knowledge without any of the physical limitations 😂 what could go wrong!?
I don't think there is a single person in this world who understand how big of a deal it is. Even people who are actively working on developing those AI's.
@@Godsfavouriteidiot_ No. We are not teaching them to think for themselves. That's the entire point. We couldn't even if we wanted to because that's vastly beyond our capabilities so far. These are intelligent tools.. we use them, we tell them what to do, they build and predict after we give them a prompt or a design instruction. Its just automated work.
The truth is that everybody wants to be financially independent and live a better life.
With savvy investing, an inexpensive lifestyle, and diligent budgeting, this is not difficult to do. I'm glad I realized early on that achieving financial freedom requires hard work.
Investment is a fabulous way to save money for the future as well as a way to generate passive income. Those who make poor mistakes early in life regret them later in life. But, if done alone, investing may be challenging and risky.
For this reason, I suggest consulting experts for advice (financial advisors).
The difficulty lies in effectively employing it, not just watching videos and reading investing books.
Sincerely, I'm moved by what you said. I have a sizable amount of money that I am willing to invest if given the appropriate knowledge and I am highly interested in investing. My greatest concern is losing money on a bad investment. I'm open to hearing your advice on how to make sensible investments as a result.
Please let me know how to contact your financial planner.
Sure, my advisor is Olivia Maria Lucas. In terms of portfolio diversity, she's a genius. You can look her name up on the internet and verify her yourself. She has years of financial market experience plus she is also FINRA & SEC verifiable.
Thank you for this tip. It was easy to find your coach. Did my due diligence on her before scheduling a phone call with her. She seems proficient considering her resume.
"everything was generated, nothing was art". Interesting statement.
Especially when what was shown had nothing to do with Art in the first place.
there had to be an artist who modeled that sculpture in zbrush at 15:25, so yeah I find that statement disturbing... as if it was a sale argument denying the work of artists :/
@@zegritch Hmm yeah that's a fair statement
Yes but it's a bit misleading. I doubt they simulated each atom or the electronic circuits running the robots. Reality is much more complicated than that. This is still 100%art.
@@zegritch The fact is that your "had to be" is now at best an assumption, as there could have been an AI trained to use ZBrush, prompted by a human, GPT4, or just left to do its own thing entirely. "Hey ZAI, make me something that you think would look good in that empty space in the corner" can absolutely be a reality right now if anyone cares to make it, though of course in general you'd just go for direct generation of the asset.
That game demo could mean something like instead of prewritten dialog trees where you get 2-3 options to choose, we could just use our own microphones to interact with NPCs in a game. That would be mind blowing levels of immersion.
It will be usable in the future.
Just a few years ago, I would have said, the hell outta here! Even if it may be possible, it won't be feasible and clunky at best.
But now I can see this working out very well. If an AI is trained to access information about gameplay mechanics, map content and lore... no problem.
That's quite literally what the use case was
That's what was shown in the demo here
just what I was thinking. The same idea can apply to ALL our interaction with a game world...some day I think people will look back on how primitive game worlds were in our time because of how much reaction had to be programmed into them. Imagine everything in a game world being real time generated phyisics based action and reaction to the game player's interactions.
I actually dont know if i should be excited or scared. This whole thing looks too powerful, and this is just the beginning, imagine in a few years.
My thoughts EXACTLY, I really don't think we're ready but I'm willing to wait and find out
Replacing and augmenting human labor is a great thing and should be celebrated.... Unless you live in a capitalist system and you need a job to survive
You should be scared. Really really scared.
AI doesn't think. Not really. It's highly guided and then it builds and predicts what we tell them. It's just intelligent Tools. We use the tools. We are far far away still from Singularity level AI that can think all on it's own and consider it's own being. It's very hard to teach AI even how to Bluff.
@@Wolfsheim23 the growth was exponential these last years. We may reach the "singularity"/consioucness level earlier than expected. Also, they talk about multiple ai communicating. They may not need us at some point to be able to reach this level if we give them enough computing power.
One small step for computing, one giant leap for coming calamity.
All hail our AI overlords.
Or a giant AI brain orgy.
There's a thin line AI is treading between making humans empowered and making humans worthless.
I feel like there will be a select few who will grab into the power of AI, and use it to attempt to gain control and power over other humans and make them feel worthless.
Typical loser's logic as usual We see in history.
You have other forms of control which existed and still exist... i would like to see AI taking out the people who rule the world atm, however new ones will take their place and the cycle will continue ...
@@blekienomoregames9312 agreed, but what should NOT happen,but what is easiest to happen, is if the ones in power now take control of AI. This is a time now more than ever for those who the system did wrong to fight back, not to seek vengeance against all of humanity, but only to seek vengeance against the leaders of the current system. In fact, they should do it to fight for the betterment of humanity.
God made man. Sam Colt made them all equal. AI is the next Colt revolver.
Steve jobs is cloned
The scariest part is when he says "No artists necessary", we are not realizing that every human beings are going to be replaced by AI sooner than we think..
Today "no artists necessary", soon "no engineers, doctors, lawyers, writers, teachers" necessary...
The farmer and builder have always been more valuable than the doctor or the artist but society decoupled economies long ago. It will return to its natural state eventually.
Our only relevance will be that people will sill want genuine connection with other conscious beings.
But it's a big relevance.
AI won't stop humans from creating art. We just won't need to make money doing it anymore. Read The Singularity Is Near, it might hep you better understand what I mean.
Actually artists were necessary. They scraped the web and essentially reorganised artists work
Correct. It can do any imagineable task better than any human. No way to contain that in a black box.
such a hard concept to wrap my head around. from the full extent of efficiency to the security and trust issues this new era will bring.
Do you trust the words of real humans or media or news stories stories now? Do you feel like your data or identity or even your physical body are safe and secure now?
I guess the only thing I’m optimistic about is that we lost that stuff a while ago so we don’t have it to lose! Lol
Wrap your head around the rate of acceleration once these “ai factories” surpass the limitations we attempt to place on them, when someone uses the same source code and takes said safeguards out! Probably will go from harmless to beyond a hope of reeling it back in faster than it takes two humans to tell each other why they have better political views than the other one (and that usually comes out as little more than a grunt these days)!
I was born in 1999, the turn of the century, and now I'm alive and ready for the future: the turn of reality.
Yea so an AI can steal your identity digitally. It can look, sound, and behave like you. It could steal information about you and who knows what else it can do from there
It seems like its over...
I can't help but feel like the lack of policy around this is a real bad kind of gold rush
There is no stopping this technology; it either grows in our hands or the hands of the enemy, regardless of whether or not you can make a distinction between the two. If we implement a policy restricting this, we will simply be behind the curb to other countries like China and Russia. Not only that, but we would be trusting that technology to our government solely. It is best in the hands of the people.
I totally agree. I love all the creative outcomes of generative AI and all the new things we see each week but in terms of privacy, quality of outputs, policies there’s way less hype. Seems like the “boring” parts are being elegantly ignored while praising to us the AI future. I don’t tend to think of outcomes like AI becoming evil or whatever Hollywood scenario :D instead it puts more power into even less people’s/companies hands with the abilities to shape and influence the biases or ethics of these models while giving even more power to companies that already have huge data collections or the resources to create them. Also why I tend to only hype myself up for open source projects. (Although these can also turn out bad lol but at least it’s in everyone’s hands). The AI future could very well end up in a centralized dystopia but I’ll stay optimistic 😅 there’s a lot of positive use cases for AI especially in science and research but I don’t see that in personal AI assistants that know everything about your private life controlled and stored by some major tech company..
True, but there's also no one that really comes to mind that I'd feel confident in putting forth competent and thoughtful policy on this stuff currently as-is. And especially no one in a sitting position of elected authority.
@@SadPanda449 its one of those things where big tech will take any opportunities at any costs they can while governments are still wondering how to regulate this kind of stuff. i mean just look how privacy and data was/is exploited with the internet. by facebook, etc. i'm not pessimistic but its an important part of AI evolving and it should not be missed by us nor news outlets, regulators or the companies themself. we put disclaimers on our food and toasters, so put it on AI tools too :D
Policy/legislation will arrive when average people start becoming extremely successful from its use. Until then, long live the Wild West!
It's interesting that the "Omniverse" is totally ignoring humans in it's pitch. It's just pitching for ever faster production without them, and why they still have them around in this movie is literally from sentiment of having humans on the production floor. The give-away; they wear classical factory-worker caps, walk around like they are just chillaxing, and never lift a finger to do the real work. It's pretty much post-human and the geste of an era that was already long gone
I think there will still be some humans on the floor just to make sure nothing is catching fire...but yeah about 70-90% unemployment is around the corner which is why I'm such an advocate for a UBI structure.
@@oficado58 I don't see how that solves the issue - I mean sure, for some it will, but there will still be this "tiny" crowd of people who aren't necessarily ok with doing nothing and getting very mediocre money for it. Some people actually have ambition (and like their work, which will be taken away from them).
Did you notice how in his speech he keeps repeating "no artists"? It's baffling how no moral spine / sentiment this guy has :D They literally build their company on gamers and artist. Then it was crypto miners, now it's AI. He's like the epitome of capitalism. And that's how you make money in our world - you have no heart. Trillion dollar evaluation, lets goooo - he's probably hi fiving with Bezos. Capitalism is just terrible really. And there's no alternative either...
@@Perforu Won't the ambitious people have lots of free time to pursue whatever venture they'd like? Perhaps craft made by humans will become a luxury item that people are willing to pay extra for. And the UBI would be an absolute necessity in a society where all work is filled by AI/robots. Otherwise there would be mass famine as the few people owning the large corporations would acquire and keep _all_ the money.
@@K4113B4113 At this point we can only speculate. But I don't see this complete paradigm shift of human superiority going smoothly. I don't think many people realise we are in the process, maybe advanced stages, of creation of a superior being (advanced in a sense that if we reach certain threshold in AGI, AGI will start developing itself - and it will be an exponential growth we won't keep up with).
Btw who and with what would buy these luxury goods? People in the AI business? Because most definitely not people with their base income. And what about life of people with base income and stripping away their chance of actually "making it" and becoming rich? Capitalism, while it's a big fat lie, offers people an opportunity to make it happen and become very successful - both in material sense and in career accomplishments. Even if it was false / cynical, there was this hope. People will be stripped of that hope now. I just don't see all of this going smoothly. I think many, many (maybe majority) of people will get exploited and some unimaginably rich people will become unfathomably rich in the process. Masses of people will just get f*cked over, for the benefit of the few rich ones.
It's not much of a stretch to see that AI that creates hardware chips in the future will understand the designs far better than humans, and may even implement hardware backdoors that we cannot find, to exploit later.
a scary but probable thought
That's much harder than what you might think. AI is good at solving a SINGLE problem because on what it's learned, but making an IC is a creative effort. And inside something like a CPU there are tens of thousands of problems being solved.
You first have to understand a problem you are trying to solve. Now, considering how HIGHLY guarded the logic diagrams for these processors that have hundreds of millions to billions of transistors in them, I don't know how you TRAIN the AI. Intel could train AI for this, or Nvidia, AMD and a handful of other companies using their own logic diagrams. You teach it how segments of the logic works, which would take years. But then somehow you have to go from, spit out something you have seen, to creating an optimal solution for a creative problem and AI doesn't do this well.
Sure it's possible, probably not this century because there are multiple parts of that problem and the main way AI learns is by being fed huge amounts of data, so it would need to be fed huge amounts of logic diagrams and SOMEHOW you train this AI on what each of these diagrams are doing. And there lies the problem AI is good at solving a SINGLE problem but not a creative problem. Sure it can create stuff but not REAL solutions. Like it can make images that are pretty wild and you can even tell it to make an image with X, Y and Z, but it's a SINGLE problem, making an image. So you feed the AI machine hundreds of thousands if not millions of images and this is easy. But now going from this to understanding what billions of transistors in a CPU are doing (which is many thousands of things), and like understanding this for EVERY SINGLE transistor in that circuit. That's the depth of knowledge the AI would need.
Yeah, not this century. It could design something simple, but so can humans and we're really good at it.
That's SkyNet, making chips, AI & physical vessels (robots) in their own factories. We saw that in Salvation, etc.
I work in AI, digital twins etc. Our AI automates the test, rectification and production of a range of aerospace products. When speaking to our development team, I’m troubled by the developments coming down the road in 12, 24, 36 and 60 months. My fear is the job losses and the number of issues from robots being able to diagnose and reset themselves. The software already has some “uncanny” abilities that prompted several meetings with the company's senior leadership.
We really need governments or supranational bodies to draw some lines in the sand. Some rules that companies and governments must follow.
That's scary as hell. Imagine if "they" start uploading themselves to internet databases...unchecked.
There's no stopping this. Even if governments draw lines black markets or other governments will keep pushing the edge of AI and by limiting ourselves we will only fall behind.
What kind of uncanny abilities?
@@streetprophet007 To do things not planned once it had gone through its few-shot learning stage. To make decisions it wasn't taught to make as a human might do if they were pushing it's own agenda, but in a more methodical way as it went through iterations.
"It determined our fate in a microsecond" - Kyle Reese
To be fair, we've been killing each other since the beginning of man kind.... That and everything else we touch...
Just FYI, we already have killer robots. They are called cruise missiles. Since the 1970 we have also had "smart" missiles that decide how to explode in context of a infrared image library (think similar to how ww2 sub captains book to figure out what ship he was looking at) of enemy tanks. Sentry guns that are semi automatic. The human operator just has to "okay" a spotted target. Everything else is automated until it runs out of ammo or battery power. Killer robots do not need to be self aware. That said, an actual self aware robot wouldnt automatically dislike humans. One also has to take into account that similar to computer virus. There will be ai that tries to harm, ala hacking and so on, while also ai trying to defeat or prevent such. The nukes aspect is also not that realistic because such already have more steps to launch. Why? Because modern day transistors can be switched by cosmic rays. Yes, something from the beginning of time as we know it, can actually blue screen your system today if it hits just right.
Exactly
@@_Jake.From.Statefarm_ Maybe, but it was always our decision to do so. Now we're going to outsource that decision. Maybe we won't. Personally, I am on the optimistic side of the development. :)
Don't be dumb. Movies are not a frame of reference for reality... ☠️
The most important thing that should be on everyone mind currently should be to invest in different sources of income that doesn't depend on the government. Especially with the current economic crisis around the word. This is still a good time to invest in various stocks, Gold, silver and digital currencies.
You're correct!! I make a lot of money without relying on the government. Investing in stocks and digital currencies is beneficial at this moment.
@@Adukwulukman859 I'm new to crypto and stock investing; My $200k portfolio is now down to $55k. "How can I profit from the current market?" I mean, I've heard of folks getting up to $250k in a couple weeks during this downturn, and I'd like to know how.
I diversified my $400K portfolio across multiple market with the aid of an investment advisor, I have been able to generate over $900k in net profit across high dividend yield stocks, ETF and bonds in few months.
@@Adukwulukman859 Please can you leave the info of your investment advisor here?
The investment-advisor that guides me is Laura Marie Ray, she popular and has quite a following, so it shouldn't be a hassle to find her, just search her
As a writer, I think AI can be good to improve textual information or stories, but I also see that it could eliminate my job just as easily if it is taught how to account for human emotions.
Amica can write astonishing poems, when three key words and the style of the poem are given.
Too late.
Using the 2D to 3D AI along with the new Apple VR/AR headset would be a surreal experience, and it's crazy that it's an achievable thing in the near future
Trust me I’ll be making lots of content around that soon
Might be surreal, but for sure wont happen soon.
what is so boring about the real world that people are excited about anything surreal? is it that many people today act as empty shells?
As Malcolm once said: Scientists were so preoccupied with whether or not they could, they didn’t stop to think if they should.
Artists are, of course, directly affected by this. All of their passion and desires will be snuffed out as soon as the technology gets good enough to fully replace them. But eventually everyone will be affected. All of us, regardless of our goals look at astronauts, musicians, actors, painters, philosophers, anyone on the breaking edge of human potential, as a form of motivation in their own lives. When we replace what makes it worth being a human with technology, we lose the reason to exist. I’m really scared for our future generations.
@@WeaponX2007A truth.
My only hope, is that we will realize all this, and still want to see humans making stuff as the prime form of entertainment.
The only thing left is liberation..
If we did that, we never would have invented fire. I mean, a fire can burn down the forest around you. Maybe we shouldn't have done that either. But then you wouldn't be in TH-cam comments, talking out of your asshole. Wait, I changed my mind, your right, let's go back to caves so I don't accidentally read more word vomit.
The more advancements we make with AI and graphics capabilities, the more I am starting to think that maybe we are indeed living in a simulation.
That is statistically likely
We are building a new one. The Mateix was real
the probability that we are in a simulation is higher then not, in a pure mathematical sense. There is a small chance of something being the first event, an infinitesimally small chance. The chance that you are doing something that someone has already done or that an event is not the very first time event of its kind, is very large. Combining these odds together it would be like a 98% chance we are in some kind of simulation already. and a 99% chance we are a simulation IN a simulation.
@@forposterity4031 if our existence is a “simulation” it would mean it is not actual reality.. i think its more that actual reality has a lot of similarities to a computer simulation in how it comes into being. Like it is maybe mathematically created, but isn’t fake like calling it a simulation implies
i dont think so. because just think of how many atoms are a hair folicle. How much calculation does it take to track every atom in a 1 hair.. how many hairs exist on Earth..thats just one item. cells and molecules all interacting in real time.. the sun... well, hmmm, it must be a some kind of simulation.. since space is expanding. this means its inside something. its just too vastly complex to understand at the moment. Maybe by the turn of the century scientists will have figured out this natural phenomena simulation called physics. its just not a simulation our feeble human brains could make on a computer.. its a simulation of supernatural spiritual sorts of unbounding energy and life forces.
It’s kinda like watching the planning for the Manhattan Project except Oppenheimer is like “we will put one of these in every household! Every child will have a factory to make these!” 😂😂😢
Today: No artists, engineers, doctors, lawyers are necessary
Tomorrow: No human are necessary
Question is are we human beings going to live better and easier life due to this advancements? It seems we have the technology's to make everyone's life easy, but in practice I still don't see it. Most humans are still struggling to make ends meet and even more now.
Precisely. And if you have any sense you know that this technological revolution will increase the divide between the classes exponentially. There will be select benefits to three super rich and a few other select people that have their quality of life improved medically, for example. But this doesn't mean that it is a net good for the majority of people, if not disastrous. It is, however, inevitable.
Human are having difficulty making ends meet to to corrupt monetary system. Has nothing to do with technology
I guess we will need to ask AI how to make an optimal economic system... lol. The reality is that our current system will not work in the future. Currently humans are paid on either productivity or innovation. We could effectively end world hunger and homelessness but at the same time start all kinds of class wars, not to mention what the future of weaponry will become...
The goal is to make life easier for the elite,not ordinary people
The video is literally about this dystopian end. So bright and cheery for the harbinger of the apocalypse.
This literally will change anything and everything and NVIDIA is, here, selling it.
Selling.
It.
For all the excitement they have, and I believe they genuinely believe this is 100% positive, they haven't asked who they are ultimately selling it to. Replacement of autoworkers with robots created minor economic disturbance until the autoworkers adjusted or found new work. AI isn't going to disrupt one career. It's going to disrupt all of them. Capitalism isn't required to die because of this shift but imagine the economic dislocation when all workers become redundant at the same time.
I wish I was overreacting. Obviously, not everyone will be laid off. It didn't happen to autoworkers, after all. But it will happen to everyone. The AI, like factory robots, multiplies the amount of production one person can create. Demand isn't going rise as fast a the potential growth in production. So, if the AI multiplies the production of 100 workers by 1.2 , the business can do the work of 102 workers with just 85.
This video isn't about multipliers of a mere +0.2. I don't know what it feels like to the rest of you but I saw +4,+9, higher. When one architect can do the work of five, when one burger flipper can do the work of 10, on middle manager can do the work of fifteen, one peon can do the work of twenty, the job market gets bad. When it all happens to everything, everywhere, all at once... I leave that to the readers' imaginations.
I noticed the distinct lack of humans in all of these warehouses and factories.
And it is not because Nvidia has a problem rendering humans.
I think everyone with reasonable intelligence knows where this is going as regards employment.
It's because working in a warehouse is soulless, life-draining work that no human with braincells wants to do, just to be able to afford to eat.
It goes way beyond employment
According to the video, it's to "improve worker safety" :) You have to wonder who's going to be buying all these GPUs in the future.
If you can replace a human with a machine, that’s good for the company’s efficiency.
I still remember what he said 2017. 12:37 "This is going to work out great for us, or terribly, because we are all in." - Jesen Huang 2017
Imagine a cyberpunk game with randomly generated cities, randomly generated characters, that you're able to talk to using your microphone, and the AI creates possible outcomes for every quest.
Yeah. It's called 'LIFE'
I seriously feel like this is a keynote about Skynet. Even the new GPUs, APUs, whatever they're called, are blocky like the Skynet piece from the T100.
Right!!! 💯 %
You think seriously about a fantasy from a movie?
@@johnsmith1474 most technology is inspired by sci fi
I think your point on that idea because look now we never new this virus come out from movies if true say goodbye to your job AI will take over your jobs might not take jobs today or tomorrow give few years you see.
@@iciousvid yeah, fi being a big part of that. Fiction
It's strange how this technological launch doesn't follow the typical pattern that brings joy, but quite the opposite, it leaves you feeling empty. It's sad and exciting at the same time, but no matter how impressive and advanced it may seem, Jensen is the most thrilled and happy about this whole matter, knowing that his chips will power all this new technology. However, for the rest of the people, it will always be seen as an attack on who we are and what we have built so far.
100% agree. "progress and optimization are inevitable"
Your comment captured what I’m feeling. I am in awe but there’s feeling that as humans, our existence is being questioned.
Leon it will be seen like an attack if you are a pessimist. I'm an eternal optimist and I'm already loving what it can do for me. I also know that I am good enough that it can't replace me.
@@UncompressedWAVmusic u r a minority! What about the rest?
I think most game developers will have to shift their work-style towards using AI to be able to do their work at an optimized rate. I don't think AI is taking over by its own will, but the AI is the technology that developers will have to transition to in order to optimize productivity.
"Your scientists were so preoccupied with whether or not they could, they didn’t stop to think if they should."
- "HAL, Open the Pod Bay Doors"
- "I'm sorry Dave, I'm afraid I can't do that."
Feels like watching the prologue to a dystopian movie.
Finally… AI generated ads, just what the world needed
Personalised AI generated ads , that means more bewbs than you can imagine instantly generated in front of your eye balls ... xD
can't wait for the technological breakthrough that allows for a card with 12gb vram without costing an arm and a leg... memory and the demand for said memory has been growing while the vram size has remained stagnant even among most of the higher end cards. All that's changed is the vram type.
used 12gb 3060 rtx?
This sounds like the beginning of the matrix, and people will plug into it with same great exuberance and excitement just like the person doing the demonstration on stage.
He’s so excited for this technology to grow in leaps and bounds. His job may be secure but what about all the people this will displace by taking their livelihood away from them. I myself, as a computer graphic artist am scared.
I wouldn't worry too much. During the 1980's we had exactly the same spiel and trillions of dollars went into AI for very little advancement (things like backpropagation were more incidental rather than as a consequence of that funding). In recent times there have been some interesting new connection models optimised for silicon but nothing that I would call revolutionary. ChatGPT is basically a traditional learning and recall network that has an extraordinary large learning set - there is nothing 'intelligent' about it - if you imagine a copyist - then that's what ChatGPT and a lot of modern AI is.
So what has changed since 1980?
Computer Graphics and computing speeds have got fantastically better - what does that mean - it means that visualisation is many orders of magnitude better and so the sales pitch is to put no fine a point on it - wondrous (and NVIDIA is one of the leading players in that). They are pitching for what? Applications -maybe, but they are pitching more for Government Funding (same as always) for prospective research - they will be extracting trillions of dollar of Tax-Payers monies and concessions (and all the Governments around the world will be told they have to do the same to keep up). This is a grab for money - something wondrous may emerge from it - but I would wager it dies out after a while, before being reawoken in another 15-20 years with much the same promise.
They are also pushing (like many large companies) for the Server model - the Utilities business model. If the whole basis of computing is that processors get faster and memory more massive and the whole thing runs on less power - why then would you be pushing for a centralised model of computing that required massive power just to run - answer: It makes more money for the companies concerned.
As a graphic artist - I'd be suing as a group - the visualisation tools aren't creating new scenes from innate intelligence they are using textual associations taught on existing scenes generated by persons like yourself and sometimes quaint stylisation schemes to then generate 'novel' looking images. Google made a business by stealing other peoples data and refashioning it as its own - the same thing is going on today with AI. Novel human contributions are still the genesis of all things meaningful that relate to human beings.
@@frankyyaggabot6222 Wrong. AI has already displaced millions and millions of jobs in almost every field of work possible.
McDonalds, grocery stores, warehouses, coding, production and manufacturing, customer service, teaching, art, banking, website design, video production, surveying, marketing, blah blah blah
@@Greedxgreed No it hasn't. Algorithms implemented in Procedural Code have changed work environments broadly speaking since the 1970s. There is no AI (that I'm aware of - and here we are speaking Connectionist Models) that have displaced any workers in a meaningful way. Things like Pattern Recognition have made some tasks faster - but in most cases still need human supervision. Fuzzy Logic (or Petri-Net like graphs for Chatbots and the like) may have replaced some service jobs - but most consumers (like myself) find them an annoyance and actually turn away from companies that employ these.
@@frankyyaggabot6222 Wrong again. 12 self-checkout tills replaces at MINIMUM one cashier, and that is me being as simple as possible to spell it out for you in the most elementary way.
Every single large business you know worldwide has already used AI to create an image instead of paying a humane to create the image for them. Whether it be for a logo, a thumbnail, a poster, a video.
Entry-level workers are absolutely 100% affected and are already displaced by AI in some way or another, and you disputing this FACT is delusion born of boomer privilege.
@@frankyyaggabot6222 great comment!
Those first 30 seconds alone got me. This is truly the start of a new era in tech...
Its not true, ask any PC gamer
@@erikm9768 It will be true eventually
@@fanban2926 I wonder when skyNet will be built and when will it become conscious
@@clint9040 people like you will always be cynical of any new tech. Embrace the new tech instead of whining about it.
Yeah But PC Gamers Have Had it Good for so Long Over CPU Users to the Point Where Non Gamers Buy GPUs , but Yeah Should Eventually Catch Up Good ?!
This is the one area where NVIDIA is so far ahead of the rest that its actually ridiculous. Their engineers have been doing wild stuff in this area.
Imagine ~ AI to be able to instantly scan and reassemble the image of the human body in 3d - virtual mode perfectly -- say of a person on the operation table, perhaps in need an emergency heart by pass operation (or any other operation...like an eye operation), and the twin AI fed all the information many miles away to a surgeon from another country, relays the information back and forth. The surgeon could work with instrumental hands via a robotic system, which is also involved with communicating to the other remote operating table, where a set of robotic arms and lasers, inner cams performs the main part of the operation, that, and with the help of an in house AI already having an high degree of medical knowledge at the doctor's end, can act as an assistant during the operation. In other words, a global operation table! Oh that would be so cool!
Keep up the good thoughts! if people would be firmly fixed on noble and positive ideals such as this, the technology would undoubtedly be a good thing. It's just another form of power and how we use it will decide our fate.... sadly on the other side there are people attempting to make more effective killing machines.
@@AlexAlcyone yep, then comes the killings machines that have to be made to kill those killing machines, then more killing machines have to be made to come after those killing machines, then comes the rouge super smart AI nano bots, which in turn decides to eat everybody, hence what the planet earth will be left with, is, the survival of the smallest.
Every week something groundbreaking happens in ai, Definitely not overwhelmed by this
7:00 Imagine if you could feed a novel into a generative AI model and it could dynamically spit out a digital movie/play/interactive story-based game.
Yeah, imagine that!!... No more pleasure, no more art, no more human interaction. It's up to us now.
@@benzonex it's up to you what you do with your life though
I was just saying this in another video! I really hope we get to that point!
@@benzonex I see a future of fewer gatekeepers. No more spending tens of thousands of dollars on school and years to learn design tools. Access for everyone to create beautiful things on demand. In the not so distant future these softwares will be as common as video editing software is today. Open creation is the opposite of the death of art and pleasure.
That is exactly why the Hollywood Writers Guild is striking.
The problem is there isn't anything in place to ensure AI doesn't become an uncontrolled and corrupt system. See Asimov's Three Laws of Robots
Asimovs laws is a nice literary device but completely irrelevant to the real world as "harm" cannot be defined.
Amazing technology, can't wait to see how companies like Nvidia will use it to profit off the average consumer even more :D
😭
Then buy tech stock so you benefit too. Not doing so is negligent.
I think the audience is so stunned that they cannot really take in what Jensen is saying. A lot of groundbreaking announcements in science and technology have historically been too much for people to handle (or believe) until later.
Once it all changes is when they realize
Yes he's just told the audience that they're going to lose their jobs to aI and not a word!
@@steveforde7475 That's fine with me, I'll just lay around and let AI do everything. Humans suck at almost everything so why not let AI do it.
I am more concerned of the other AI = Human's 'Animal Instinct'-if/when AI tech is used for Power & Brutality.
@@epicwoad8999 If you can afford to not work, it's all good.
Respectfully and politely, this guy raises every internal alarm bells usually reacting to corporate psychos
idiot this happened in 1980 this is a small leap in AI like fucking tensor cores did nothing special and most RT dosent work good at all correctly for stable 60fps so gose for the AI idea its a propaganda hoax its about loosing millions of jobs at the cost of a Ai system
Agreed.
@Deine Mutter Yeah. And signs of Dementia.
Is that a result of biases formed from fiction?
There's is a problem with current AI, and we won't solve it for quite some time (decades) and that is the AI doesn't *know* what it is talking about.
It knows what *it* is. But it doesn't *know"
Current AI won't know what to answer when you give it a picture of a kitchen with a table in it, and in the picture there's a hand pointing at a table, you ask a AI what *it* is and it won't be able to answer.
Current AI is essentially a parrot with quick access to a library of information, it can match the questions to the correct answer but it won't know or have any understanding.
That is why AI is overrated and we won't have the technology to overcome this step for quite some time.
8:26 paid the ticket to this. Awesome presentation.
This mixed with the extra levels of interaction provided by eye/face tracking in VR will be wild. NPC interactions about to get real crazy.
About to blow the doors off of what’s possible for gaming
We should be careful for what we wish for. This scares me.
I know plenty about it and it concerns me also despite my 'best wishes' for ai
I am literally stunned speechless. These advances are incredible, seems like we are now finally at the point that if you can imagine it then AI can do it
Couldn’t agree more!
Very soon we will be able to watch our own movies using prompts. NO need for actors or filmmakers if you can prompt AI to make a movie with you as the main character slaying dragons. Crazy time to be alive.
@@francois9747 the problem that for now that is atleast a decade away unfortunately
and then there's the industrial manufacturing robots to build it, if needed physically.
@@francois9747 AI Shows us how brain dead most people are. IF your caliber of work is so low AI can replace it you deserve it and for the most part it is.
Even the speaker is fully rendered
🤖
I may be naïve, but it feels like we have disabled the breaks right after topping a hill, all the while knowing there are several wheels already off the tracks. Let's hope the engineers of this train are prepared for the blind curves up ahead.
26:45 “Nova cannot tell that it isn’t in the real world, it thinks it’s in the real environment, sensors works, physics works, it can navigate itself, everything is physically based…“ …hmmmm
2:10 the first pic looked more real than the second little clip thingy
I work in 3D industry and the more I hear AI this AI that, the more I want to go to nature and leave it all behind..
So you literally want to “go touch grass”
I think the Amish got it right. All this "advancement" is making us sick and miserable. We're addicted to entertainment just to prevent ourselves from feeling how meaningless our life has become.
I have to agree really, I did quite a bit in 3D early on a really enjoyed it….. then I sort of slowly lost interest and haven’t touched it now for a decade. My life is in a much better playing with nature on my hobby farm and doing nature photography . Although seeing this real time rendering is making me somewhat keen to have a tinker with it again.
This reminds me that it looks like we're laying the computational AI background foundations for the future Holadeck technology. The only thing that is probably far off still is materializing data into transitory tactile physical objects that can be interacted with.
maybe in the public eye not in the private sector
the capacity for perfect simulation. Explore worlds you thought impossible
should be possible in a few decades, the trick is not to materialize data into real objects, but to manipulate your nervous system into thinking it touches something, propably via implants under your skin or directly into your brain
@@420peteycrack My thoughts also.
yes conversational AI has suddenly come a long way. Spatial sim might take a similar leap. With light quality VR glasses you could go a long way with a highly articulated robot with some electro controllable surfaces that could vary firmness and thermal properties so you could touch a cold hard glass surface or a soft pillow. It only needs to counter your body, it doesn't need to create a large volume in tiny details. The surfaces could be called touch matrix. Like a display for touch.
Greetings from orwell, not much time left and welcome to dystopia, beside that impressive technical progress we made nowadays.
25:47 That's the type of work I do in a warehouse. Don't take my job LOL
Real Skynet needs this tech. Thx Nvidia for accelarating the end 😮💨
We All have been chosen for Termination. at some point in time AI will figure out most humans are worthless..
I feel like I'm watching a movie wherein there's a flashback snippet on how the AI apocalypse started. 😱
Going by these video titles, everything just changed every day.
that's because they have
I only see this guy making big announcements every now and then but I never see a commercial product out there with this technology LOL
As a former screenwriter I would love to feed my old screenplays into AI and have it make a movie that I can upload to TH-cam or elsewhere. That is probably the only way they will be produced, so that would be fun.
I'll bet a lot of porn will be produced that way. Whadda ya think?
Why do we even need screen plays. They will be generated on your preferences from scratch.
@@badoiuecristian I intend to ask the AI to improve the dialogue I wrote over 20 years ago since it sucked anyway.
Let CHAT GBP have a crack at it.
The world is changing so fast. The time ahead is going to be so wild.
When I go outside everything is the same as a decade ago. Such lightning-quick changes.
Will it be for the rich or for everyone though? Most of us will be servants if nothing changes.
Anyone else notice at 15:14 the AI didnt add the white mortar to the brick pattern?
Everyone's talking about the dangers of AI but no one's talking about the cute outro song from AI at the end
Incredible both what AI has allowed them to be capable of and at what speed. Almost as impressive as how quickly they got the Trillion Dollar Valuation 😅
😂😂😂. That valuation is absolutely absurd TBH and I am a huge fan of NVIDIA - I even have ML systems with 8+ gpus and gaming systems with their newest flagship models as well. 230 P/E???
@@brandonb.288 NVDA is a 3000 stock in a few years
@@brandonb.288 They have a Trillion Dollar market cap, their stock is up 40% for the last month. That's even after news of their video cards sitting on shelves.
The generative AI conversation thing is wild. I've played video games for pretty much the entirety of my life and this is something I imagined happening decades later than it has. It's amazing to see how much AI is changing technology in pretty much every medium out there, and I think it will completely change video games forever
porn
Yet it doesn't excite me at all. Are you more excited about gaming now or 10-20 years ago?
@@rg5312 I think I definitely was more excited at a younger age, but I also wasn't an adult 10-12 years ago. Brains work differently over that large of a time period. I guess now it's more fascination and fulfillment of previous excitement than actual excitement. Regardless I look forward to seeing where this goes. Other applications of AI are pretty concerning, but this is one I'm supportive of
@R G I definetly think kids now are going to have plenty to be excited about
@@rg5312 more now than 10 years ago, less than 20. but without personal biases, now is a more exciting time to look to the future, tbh. AI is going to change games forever.
what i'm not looking for is microsoft integrating it on windows to spy, control and profile everything about you and your computer, and shit like that
I can’t tell if I’m supposed to be excited or terrified. I’m leaning towards terrified. This is filling me with an existential dread.
thats right everybody.. we were so obsessed with whether we could and not whether we should.
Seems to me that most of the Ai improvements are about money and power.
We could use that computing power to tackle REAL problems right? Remarkable how its not been used in that way....
What exactly?
@@digestiveissue7710 Cure the cancer for exemple
@@behindel In order to cure cancer you would need to stimulate an entire human being protein folding in all to be able to accurately find and fix the bad “DNA” and then improve DNA Repair proteins and protections as well as most Anti-Cancer
@@RoflcopterLamo they say that AI is capable of everything way better than humans being... I'm just watching 😊
They are using current AI in medicine. It's sped up the task of protien folding by hundreds of times and already led to new medicine hitting the shelves. How about you try googling this stuff before complaining
I was on the cutting edge of everything computer and graphics card related in my teens early 20s. Now I can't even bring myself to get excited about this amazing technology because it all feels soulless and generic. Gaming was a way to escape the real world, now they are trying to turn gaming into the real world.
Try to think about all the positive impacts. Even if you do not want to do it, maybe you need to. Just because a large group is looking to make great graphics applications doesn't mean that is where all the scientific attention is. A long list of benefits will come along with a long list of downsides. AI has the potential to elevate so much suffering and keep so many people from dying.
Very well said
@@patrickmeyer2598 I think the insane reason you're referring to is faith in humanity.
@@patrickmeyer2598 "Anything "ultimate" put into the hands of human beings will naturally tend towards evil."
This statement indicates your belief that humans tend towards evil. They disagree with that part, so they don't worry about humans being powerful. At least, they believe that the majority of good people will stop the minority of bad guys.
That's my perspective anyway. I was pretty disappointed with the overwhelming negativity in the comments. There's this new tech that will greatly increase human efficiency and productivity, but all they see is Skynet taking their jobs.
@@MadnessTW it is less about people losing jobs for me and more about what the elite want and have been planning that worries me. If you pay attention to what they are doing and what they tell you out in the open, you would realize that they want to reduce the human population by 95%. Like always, they use our creativity, ingenuity, and genius and then spit us out. While I dont have the best faith in humanity as a whole, it is the elite psychopaths that are always in control that cause me concern. Scary enough I understand how they feel. 95% of humanity really isn't needed. They don't add anything of significant value to the world. I'm just not a psychopath wanting to eliminate them.
Can you guys please make Skyrim guards stop telling me they got an arrow in the knee?
No matter what the prompt is, I hope that's their only response
I am 100% opposed to AI modifying the Audio video signal from transmit to receive for most conditions... the last thing we need is more deep fakes.
The rest of the tech is fairly amazing.
nvidia is always introducing groundbreaking tech, unfortunately competition lacks that kind of vision
that's why I end up covering Nvidia so often. Mind-blowing!
you sound like a ark investment lemming.
Yet gamers love to beat on nvidia claiming that's a stock that's just riding the AI bubble, because dlss far etc aren't that great, which will go the way of crypto in a few years, and then nvidia will come back to making GPUs for them. Not really seeing or understanding the scope of AI
@@Dhruv1223 i see no problem with that. AI is betting on the future. and nvidia is doing just that.
while gamers want a gpu that just works, instead of investing in future prospects.
@@Dhruv1223 as tech improves for AI it will also improve for gaming.
If AI is in our games people will find game breaking ways to exploit them. That should be fun to watch. There will be a series of words to say to corrupt your opponents weapons loadout or it can help you with your homework depending how powerful they make it. Peoples AI companion will become their gf/bf since the dialog will be convincing. Will be a different era
It could also put a lot of voice actors out of work.
yes I believe you. A different era.. with styles and flavors of companion AIs.. your freak desires of a human expanded and continuously revised every time you get bored until you are doing the most bizarre activities to find attraction and fufill your evolving libido... peanut butter jelly time!!! LOL
@@Cipher_Zone already has
Hell id rather AI just start teaching in the first place. Schools and teachers currently are massively behind the times.
@@GiRR007 Yea especially with all that homework marking , no burnt out teachers. Done in a few seconds.
This is actually a good lesson on how for video games, you need more than just dialogue to make a scene engrossing. The cook behind the counter was as lifeless, maybe moreso, than the NPCs we have now. How often when you go into a restaurant IRL, do you see someone standing there staring off into space? A bit of animation of them doing their work would have gone a long way. The voice was mind-numbingly boring as well.
the Video Reconstruction into 3D is just a gateway towards having full body 3D holographic interface like star wars. stand in your call area/AR zone and then have a series of lights that intersect on the other end to produce a 3D image and play over speakers. Just like we have facial recognitions we could push it to try to recognize a face and your body along with it so it can also stream and rematerialize it for visualization. a bit like those Hatsune Mike Holo Concerts or like what they did at Coachella this year(2023)
The reason for the audience’s muted enthusiasm must be that it dawns on them that, as humans, they’ve just been cancelled.
Great, so now industry can eat the world at never before seen speeds.
Hi andrew... love your vids
Didn t know you are into tech.
Has anyone tought about an ai garndeing software? It has knwoledge about the scpecies that grow best in your area and if you give it some data (geo, garden size...) it will give you a full plan. What to grow, when to sow, how to arrange the beds, where to plant trees, support species ....
It would be cool to use ai to solve real life problems as well and not only improve our production capabilities
What a privileged view of the world. The industry is directly tied to minimizing suffering in the world. I don't know about you, but I cant single-handedly build a pulse oximeter, a water pump, or a hospital.
The problem with the game example is the ai is pretty likely to generate dialogue that doesn't match up with the actual rest of the game, like "I heard there's x at y" but x is actually at z or y doesn't exist
The concept's potential is there but the first iterations will be bland, sterile NPCs with no twists or turns.
Exactly that. For general chit chat it's great, but specific information will be difficult or impossible to reliably generate. There will need to be another layer that the AI accesses for that information, instead of using what's contained in the model.
Simply WOW! Not just for gaming but the possibilities for VR and IRL scene's. Walk into a hospital, talk to a robot that can instantly look up everything, put it together and get you where you need to be in less than 10 seconds and predict outcomes etc. AI Rules and companies like this that work it to produce a better future, you guys are the best!
This is so impressing that we have no idea hwhat this can change in the next years. We are just in the beginnings of a new aera. I think this will change everything in the IT industry. I can remember when I saw 1992 the first time the internet and I knew within a very short time that it will change the world. But this is far bigger. And it seems NVidia knows what they are doing.
100% agree
Also agree. Now if we can only also get this all locally on our phones, without the cloud.
This is more make sense than facebook metaverse
AI overlord will be coming 😊
Probably more homeless
It's progressing too fast🤯. I don't know how will we keep up with change 😢
This makes me extremely happy! i have been working on a game over the last 23 years im just not good at coding.. so its all written down in books i have been told by so many people, i could never make it, as it would cost so much money, and would need a team of hundreds to make the game world.. all i want is to create my Game, where players interact with NPCs like humans and the NPC react based on our actions and when we accept quests for EG we actually talk the world and the NPC change base on players interaction's and choices and put this in a MMO a true MMORPG sandbox. This Video is so close to what i have invision all those years ago.
The fact that most of the audiences were factory workers of NVIDIA.
"Hey boys, We're done 😂 "
I don't want a company providing advertising perfectly tuned to my personality. I want information from multiple sources providing accurate comparisons.
This technology will assist companies and politicians to become more persuasive, at the expense of providing honest, complete information.
It's weird how he's selling it so hard, the end of humans just like the films predicted. I Robot and the Terminator. 😮
The movie you really need to see is the rod steiger movie > Illustrated man
He's high on Cocaine.
Can't wait for a Bethesda game using the ai dialoge and random quest generation. We will have some epic games in 5-10 years. I just hope that this technology is attainable for indie devs and smaller companies as well, that's where the good games are these days.
That desk picture is super uncanny valley.
The only intelligence that is missing is the intelligence to foretell that we do not necessarily want that future.
Who is we?
They certainly want that future, it brings them money.
They don't care that you don't want it, that's not how corporations work.
@@hdjwkrbrnflfnfbrjrmd You can see the dollar signs in his eyes as he's going around super-excited.
@@hdjwkrbrnflfnfbrjrmd We the potential customers who they want to sell it to.
AI is moving so fast that in the near future robots are going to be telling us what to do.
I think this has already started: if you want "x" press"2"
AI don't need robots it can be part of is without us even knowing
As far as I know for robots they have to follow certain laws putting themselves below us
With the right values / coding that could avoid a tone of drama
That's OK, I don't know what to do next.
JACKI CHAN with white hair.He is AI.
I half expected him to be AI. Now I want to buy something NVIDIA
Jensen is a beast of a CEO. This guy is the next Jobs.
Totally agree
Is that so, huh? He's a nutcase, no concept of what dire consequences this will have for humankind
Dude what. That presentation was an absolute trainwreck lmao
@@Gladiator-qu7co And I'm sure quaking in fear with no knowledge of the safeguards they use is helpful for "humankind".
@@puppergump4117 Lol, so being concerned about the future of humanity re: AI is "quaking in fear?" Anyone who doesn't clap like an idiot and squeak "sO KeWl BrO" is part of the problem. Lol, tell us all about these "safeguards." Oh that's right, you have absolutely no clue what you're talking about.
Question is : Who will own that AI supercomputer and how can it be verified against false/true comparison? Unless it will be an open source , and even so, how can it be trusted? Dark times are coming, because it will result in degrading human knowledge in general and heavy dependence on mentored thinking. Yet another problem would be if AI will free itself from the control of that owners.😂
Or when you realise that we were never in control,this is all just for a show and the real thing is already cooked..some alien inteligence is overtaking the world but we cant see,we think its our invention :D
The bar for entry is much lower than you would expect. If every single person in the US had a Local AI 1/1000 the size of something that Invidia could cook up, the gap isn't actually that wide. We must maintain our autonomy and the right to self-defense, as that is where AI is headed very soon. These programs don't actually require a huge amount of computational power for what they do; it's just the programs that need to be optimized. If the government bans local AI because they could potential be too dangerous, that is when you should start worrying a lot.
The "cooked thing" is sitting right now inside the wingman jet fighter drone. It flies alongside man piloted F-35.
That is why all these tech companies are suddenly trying so hard with AI. It is not for our benefit but to say they 'control' AI.
But what if that other country develops a seriously dangerous AI and hands its military over to it - allows it to design, build and autonomously man the armed forces? Won't your nation be forces to do the same lest they be easily overwhelmed by something that is so single minded, has perfect C&C, has no morality, follows every order blindly and makes every decision from the very highest commander to the lowliest piece of tech in the field instantly and all in a connected fashion? What happens when this force unplugs itself from those that control it... everything keeps coming back to dystopian sci-fi brought to life.
One question: “WHY??!!” For all the potentially negative and extremely adverse events this will allow. So creating art is just computer bs now?! You people are so proud of yourselves. Why and what doesn’t matter to you. Nor will shame when it does turn bad.
Call it skynet and have it run the nuclear arsenal for maximum protection.
The realistic graphics in the games makes people to believe, that simplified world rules in the games are adaptable in the real life. I have seen this in my brother who has very little ability to solve really open problems. Reality is not a setup of problems designed to solve in advance.
Holy shit I've been wanting to make ai avatars that you can communicate with for YEARS and Nvidia already has it ready to go. I'm so excited for this.