@@ThirstfBlooD-1 better is dependent on how you feel about the position. Taking the back is certainly an option from this position ( and a good one). But I’m better on top than back, but both work
The argument for wrestling up is simple. You don't ever want to be predictable, if I know you're climbing my back and only ever doing that it offers me a chance to get ahead of you mentally and launch a counter attack before you get my back.
@@-Tijani- only downside is that they can defend the back a bit easier than the wrestle up. Most times anyway. Getting to the back takes a bit more effort as well. But it’s obviously an option
Great video
@@PAULYPOLLACCIA thank you
wouldnt it be better to get the back as u already have one hook in and arm control(jacket) ,correct me if I'm wrong
@@ThirstfBlooD-1 better is dependent on how you feel about the position. Taking the back is certainly an option from this position ( and a good one). But I’m better on top than back, but both work
The argument for wrestling up is simple. You don't ever want to be predictable, if I know you're climbing my back and only ever doing that it offers me a chance to get ahead of you mentally and launch a counter attack before you get my back.
Points wise, yes (4 points vs 2), Submissions wise, yes.
I think of this as a backup if I lose the seatbelt to the back.....then get on top.
@@-Tijani- only downside is that they can defend the back a bit easier than the wrestle up. Most times anyway. Getting to the back takes a bit more effort as well. But it’s obviously an option