Freedom Under Law opposes Hlophe's JSC appointment

แชร์
ฝัง
  • เผยแพร่เมื่อ 18 ต.ค. 2024

ความคิดเห็น • 48

  • @PhumlaneAmbroseNdaba-n6o
    @PhumlaneAmbroseNdaba-n6o 2 หลายเดือนก่อน +8

    Which court of law will allow to be dragged into political space without any law breached! 😂😂😂.

  • @suprememonokeng8011
    @suprememonokeng8011 2 หลายเดือนก่อน +5

    No one is challenging Ministers with criminal records, how selective

  • @Walla228
    @Walla228 2 หลายเดือนก่อน +7

    The DA will tell the GNU parties to vote against Hlope.
    This is DA testing ANC

    • @NicolasNdlangas
      @NicolasNdlangas 2 หลายเดือนก่อน

      ANC has been captured by WMC

  • @wellingtonsibanda3330
    @wellingtonsibanda3330 2 หลายเดือนก่อน +5

    Newsroom Africa you seem to be so opposed to progressive parties and your biases can be easily seen with a naked eye

  • @nomalangamanzini9242
    @nomalangamanzini9242 2 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

    Laba nje baphethwe umona, n i believe de myt b influence from doze who rule de country..VIVA Thumbeza💚💚💚

  • @SfisosiphoNkosi
    @SfisosiphoNkosi 2 หลายเดือนก่อน

    If they manage to remove Dr Hlophe from the parliamentary judiciary we as blacks are in trouble. This will mean they can target any black excellence be it a politician, CEO or any other professional who is not representing the system of the elite. We cannot allow this to go on.

  • @HARLEYQUINN-tf6ee
    @HARLEYQUINN-tf6ee 2 หลายเดือนก่อน +4

    Their case is based not on what the Constitution doesn't say but on what is meant in its entirety. The outcome will indicate just how robust our Constitution is.

    • @XolaniNdlovu-d9f
      @XolaniNdlovu-d9f 2 หลายเดือนก่อน

      The constitution is not a dictionary, u can't infere meaning on it, you must cite it. If there are blind spots then you revise it...South Africa is a Republic such appointments are guided by clear rules and policies...Sit down white people handsoff Hlope

  • @ndodangcobo5131
    @ndodangcobo5131 2 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

    I would prefer if such NGOs invest more resources and put more effort on bread and butter issues that affect the vulnerable in our communities, who are in dire need of legal representations to protect their rights.

  • @mandlazondo5586
    @mandlazondo5586 2 หลายเดือนก่อน +2

    Ibuhlungu lento eyenzeka la south Africa sidayiswa abantu abamnyama njengath. Kodwa ngisa sho namanje ukuthi ubaba u nxamalala uyohlezi emela umuntu omnyama ohluphekayo. Ongaboni uyoze abone viva MK samba nawe nxamalala uyalazi usizi lomuntu omnyama noma bengathini samba ❤❤🎉

  • @truth-Hurts375
    @truth-Hurts375 2 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

    So nice if you have an unlimited source of money !!!
    While millions live in sub human conditions !!!!

  • @molidsin5734
    @molidsin5734 2 หลายเดือนก่อน +2

    They did not oppose ramadollar because he is one of them

  • @siasmoise661
    @siasmoise661 2 หลายเดือนก่อน

    Shame unto you Chris. You have lost it this time. Wow!!!

  • @kgautletl
    @kgautletl 2 หลายเดือนก่อน

    So if they don't want him there, with all the knowledge he's got, does that mean that basically even his qualifications possibly they are saying they want to declare them null and void. WTF.. this is insane

  • @DennisGowaseb-yj1xz
    @DennisGowaseb-yj1xz 2 หลายเดือนก่อน

    Nothing will come from this court case, hlope will sit the JSC. 😅

  • @khethamkhize5970
    @khethamkhize5970 2 หลายเดือนก่อน

    We are led by phala phala, head of state wit unresolved issues but hey Da that s fine jst because da wants power! Nx

  • @sifisodube4686
    @sifisodube4686 2 หลายเดือนก่อน

    Kikiki D A knows how much on hold are black people accountable

  • @siphesihletom4933
    @siphesihletom4933 2 หลายเดือนก่อน

    I don't follow this legal argument because the provisions for the removal of a judge in the constitution are very similar to those for the removal of the president..And the Constitution is clear that no former President who has been impeached may represent parliament in any capacity, and yet the same constitution is deliberately silent on the consequences for an impeached judge. This leaves us to one conclusion, and that is the drafters of our constitution didn't find it necessary to exclude impeached judges from representing parliament in committees such as the JSC otherwise they would have said so as in the case of an impeached president.

  • @VictorShongwe-eh3sc
    @VictorShongwe-eh3sc 2 หลายเดือนก่อน

    How was he impeached?

  • @colleengreenthompson6095
    @colleengreenthompson6095 2 หลายเดือนก่อน +2

    How can we have an impeached person at this level....😮

  • @sihletngcobo
    @sihletngcobo 2 หลายเดือนก่อน +2

    Bafuna ukusphatha oFreedom under law.

    • @XolaniNdlovu-d9f
      @XolaniNdlovu-d9f 2 หลายเดือนก่อน

      Sebe sphethe angithi abantu bethu izimpumputhe

  • @nomalungelongcete5875
    @nomalungelongcete5875 2 หลายเดือนก่อน

    Mnxim FUL

  • @HarwardMbonxa
    @HarwardMbonxa 2 หลายเดือนก่อน +6

    this is motivated by nothing else but racism from these racist white organisation and when is this racist channel 405 going to give a platform to Black parties that supports Dr Hlophe as well.

  • @husainalli
    @husainalli 2 หลายเดือนก่อน

    😂😂 the absolute best are chosen to represent the poor at the highest levels.

  • @thulubhekemiya2988
    @thulubhekemiya2988 2 หลายเดือนก่อน

    Steenhuisen’s role in Hlophe’s bench removal under scrutiny
    On Bongo case John lied under oath and he also refuse to recuse himself on Dr hlophe removal

  • @ttumigaeretse500
    @ttumigaeretse500 2 หลายเดือนก่อน

    Mxm

  • @sibongilemabaso2250
    @sibongilemabaso2250 2 หลายเดือนก่อน

    Mmm😢😮

  • @colleengreenthompson6095
    @colleengreenthompson6095 2 หลายเดือนก่อน +2

    Was he not impeached for wrong doing.so wat has racist got to do with this ..

  • @kiabetsoewer3ezerrermcffxf144
    @kiabetsoewer3ezerrermcffxf144 2 หลายเดือนก่อน +2

    Racist