Quotient Rings Part 3

แชร์
ฝัง
  • เผยแพร่เมื่อ 23 ก.ย. 2024

ความคิดเห็น • 7

  • @englishwitharash
    @englishwitharash 4 ปีที่แล้ว

    That was superrrrr superrrrr awesome explained with patience and details 😍😍😍 more power to youu brooo I've watched the three consecutive videos so far

  • @tekaaable
    @tekaaable 5 ปีที่แล้ว +3

    Thank you!

    • @tekaaable
      @tekaaable 5 ปีที่แล้ว

      May I ask how long you have been doing abstract math to get the kind of intuition that you have? Im doing Algebra as a last semester undergraduate course. I can not tell you enough how much you videos are helping me!

  • @523101997
    @523101997 6 ปีที่แล้ว +2

    I think an ideal is a subring but remember a ring doesn't have to have a multiplicative identity

    • @MuffinsAPlenty
      @MuffinsAPlenty 6 ปีที่แล้ว +3

      It depends on how you define ring and subring. If you don't require that a ring have a multiplicative identity, then yes, an ideal is a subring!
      However, if you require that all rings have a multiplicative identity (this is a more modern definition of a ring), then you also require that a subring must have the same multiplicative identity as the ring itself. Under this definition, ideals (with the exception of the unit ideal) are definitely _not_ subrings!

    • @tahminatabassum9454
      @tahminatabassum9454 4 ปีที่แล้ว +2

      I was thinking the same, in fact, *every* *ideal* *is* *a* *subring.* A ring does not necessarily contain the multiplicative identity, if it does then we call the ring to be a *ring* *with* *identity.*

  • @g-abeshawel9603
    @g-abeshawel9603 4 ปีที่แล้ว

    i am attendin maths asters addis abeba university Ethiopia but i got you a week befor seriosly my algebra 1 541 course result was not good