Tennis Hard Court Drama 2024 | Part 02 | I Didn't Say Anything | The System is Glitched
ฝัง
- เผยแพร่เมื่อ 8 เม.ย. 2024
- A compilation of drama and controversies that occurred during the early 2024 hard court swing. Featuring Coco Gauff, Jeļena Ostapenko, Kateřina Siniaková, Storm Hunter, Ellen Perez, Nicole Melichar-Martinez, Anna Kalinskaya, Katie Volynets, Hanyu Guo, Tamara Zidanšek, Chloé Paquet, and more. Enjoy🎾
Second channel : / @tennisadvocatesunited
Twitter : / tennisadvocate
Instagram : / tennisadvocate
Facebook : / tennisadvocate
Merch store: teespring.com/stores/tennis-a...
#Tennis
#TennisDrama
#TennisArguments - กีฬา
Ostapenko: you will never be on my match
Judge: thanks god 😌
“Finally achieved my mission” 🙏🏽🙏🏽🙏🏽 this umpire has been cold to her before and now I see why (Linz incident)
i would feel the same as the umpire lol
Both you and the judge are broke Karen’s in shoebox apartments 😂🤣
@@PaukkuLaukkunobody cares about you Karen 😂
Bacchi is definitely up there with Jennifer Zhang as one of the most abhorrent umpires in tennis history. Blows massive calls, then blatantly lies to try to cover up his mistakes. Should be banned for life. Coco was absolutely right.
Absolutely agree. Making bad overrules and other errors is unavoidable but he FREQUENTLY manages to do things I thought were impossible 😭😭
You two freaks over me: if you both would have become a umpire, 100% you would do a worse worse worse job. So do us a favor and stfu. Thank you
You two freaks over me: if you both would have become a umpire, 100% you would do a worse worse worse job. So do us a favor and $tfu Thank you
You two lowlifes over me: if you both would have become a umpire, 100% you would do a worse worse worse job. So do us a favor and $tfu. Thank you
You two ***** over me: if you both would have become a umpire, 100% you would do a worse worse worse job. So do us a favor and st**. Thank you
Babe wake up Tennis Advocate just uploaded two new videos.
I’m up babe
"Mrs Volynets, the computer says no". 🤪
That Gauff argument would get someone hella drunk if you drank every time her or the umpire repeat the same sentence for the 50th time
I love how the umpires spit out the ‘it’s a question of fact’ line when they are losing an argument 😂
I love how players cry like a little toddler and turn out to be totally wrong, like the double bounce earlier in the video.
That's not the point. A referee or supervisor (head ref) can only overrule a decision on a question of law (the rules). The chair umpire is in charge of all questions of fact (ball in or out, player returning the ball). Coco was trying to get around that by bsing with the rules, which was clever but kind of silly. While Bacci was clearly wrong here, there's nothing the supervisor can do and we would just be wasting everyone's time.
In this case though, he is right. I mean, his decision was wrong (twice, misjudgment of the ball, and misjudgment of the fact that his call was late) but he is right when saying it’s a question of fact, in the sense that Both of them actually agree on the rule, they only disagree on facts. So calling the supervisor is irrelevant, as almost always
On the Volynets one, if umpires are just going to say 'I have to go with the system' when there is a clear error, then there is no point in keeping umpires. Get rid of them. All they do then is call the score.
Exactly. If you, as the chair umpire, felt the ball was out and there is a glitch in the system, at least replay the point. Or take a stance and call the ball like you see it. That was a blown call. He can and should have asked the supervisor how to proceed at the very least.
Oh they would still have very important tasks, like dishing out warnings for ball abuse and audible obscenities.
The commentators said the other day an umpire overruled a system call, so it was 100% possible, but that umpire just didn't want to do it. I agree at least it should have been a replay
Yeah, I wonder if because it was so far out, it was out of the detection range. That was way out.
These line judges and chair umpires need to be retrained. Inconsistent interpretation of the rules throughout the tournaments.ATP and wta need to do something.
it must take hours to gather all the clips and edit them together, appreciate all the hard work the creator/s of this channel put in!
🙏💚
“Final In linz I will never forget” proceeds to show us what happened 😂😂😂
umpire was right in that moment too, Ostapenko never takes accountability and always blames others
Both calls against Ostapenko were the correct
@@murgatroidspBoth calls were completely wrong. First was clear double bounce and second was call that hindered Ostapenko's shot. In second Ostapenko's clip call came bit before Ostapenko's shot and according to official tennis rules that's replay of the point. You clearly have zero clue how tennis rules works. Stop embarrassing yourself. Ostapenko was correct both times.
@@user-bj4ni3vx6rNope. Umpire was wrong both times. In first case ball wasn't up when Azarenka returned it back. It was clear as a day that it's double bounce and in second case Ostapenko missed after line umpire made a line call. Then Ostapenko challenged the call and umpire wrongly awarded the point to Gauff although in this case it should have been replay of the point, because according to official tennis rules it's replay of the point. You are blind and delusional. Stop embarrassing yourself with your bullshit.
@@user-bj4ni3vx6rWhat bs is that? Do you even watch tennis? Because by reading your bs comment, you don't watch tennis. In first case ball clearly wasn't up when Azarenka returned it back. It was obvious double bounce. I don't understand how you can be this blind. Also in second case Ostapenko missed her shots after line umpire called out and according to official tennis rules it's replay of the point. You embarrassed yourself.
That call against Guo might be the worst I’ve ever seen
That ball seemed a foot in.
Yeah the ball wasn't even on the line, it was clearly well inside the court
not nearly as bad as some others, like the 1 with Volynets was waaaay worse
Nothing beats the umpire overruling a ball 1 meter inside the baseline in the match with Khachanov and Evans.
Frl looked like it was at least half a metre inside
4:00 I was there sitting courtside on Azarenka's side, my seat was on the same height as the court, from my angle it was obvious that Azarenka got it, they showed a replay on the arena screen that showed an angle that made it look like double bounce and it set Ostapenko off even more
Volynets got totally screwed there, it's a shame when the system doesn't work on an important point
1st world problems…
YAY I MISSED YOU, TENNISADVOCATE!
🙏💚
In Volynets's match the system call the wrong call & show the wrong ball. The Chair umpire says "For me, I thought it was out also. But I can't overrule the system." Then Why we need the umpire? He didn't do his job anymore.
Some of these umpires should be checked for Alzheimer's because their memories and recollection of the calls they make are extremely spotty to say the least.
The way the umpire kept interrupting Coco 😡. And he was wrong.
Ostapenko: I never want you on my match again! You will never be on my match!
Judge: Please don't do this to me! I'll do anything you want!
2 VIDS 1 DAY! WE ARE BLESSED
Love that this channel always upload 2 videos at the same time 🙌🏽
2:46...that eye roll by the umpire. She was done with Ostapenko's BS.
For those wondering if Bacchi ever apologized to Gauff, given that he promised to do so if a replay showed him to be wrong ... of course, he didn't.
I'm glad Gauff won that match. That fish-faced umpire was not only wrong but pretty annoying and arrogant as well.
Did he apologize to Coco as he promise?
while yes he was wrong I never understand why the players want a supervisor on the court. It achieves nothing, the call won't change.
@@juha1428 good point. But maybe it's just a mix of feeling helpless and not wanting to let the umpire get away with it. "If he's gonna ignore me and stick to his wrong decision, at least let everyone see it" kind of thing? Talking to the umpire must often feel like talking to a wall. And I'm sure in the heat of the moment, you are mad at the umpire but can still talk a little more politely to an outsider who didn't wrong you (the supervisor). Plus: this way, the umpire has to explain his point to a third person and summarize the whole situation once more. Come to think of it, I would also call the supervisor if I were her 😅
Literally the other day I randomly thought, wow long time no drama video from Tennis Advocate, and came here to check, nothing. And surprise! The video came in today😍
The way I was thinking about this channel today 😭😭so glad u posted
🙏💚
2:30 Ostapenko of course gets mad when she loses a point, but does that unsportsmanlike shoe squeak while Azarenka's trying to serve. PLUS, she was wrong Azarenka got the ball up in one bounce, not "three", like she claimed.
You should be checked, because you don't have good eyesight. Azarenka got it in 2 bounces. It was obvious double bounce. Stop arguing with the reality. You only embarrass yourself.
A lot of players "squeak" their shoes. There's nothing unsportsmanlike about it. And for your information ball touching the ground twice is double bounce. And the ball did touch the ground twice before Azarenka returned it back which means that umpire was blind and wrong and it was obvious double bounce and Ostapenko's point according to official tennis rules. You can deny it all you want, but it won't change anything. I am still correct and you are wrong.
A lot of players "squeak" their shoes. There's nothing unsportsmanlike about it. And for your information ball touching the ground twice is double bounce. And the ball did touch the ground twice before Azarenka returned it back which means that umpire was blind and wrong and it was obvious double bounce and Ostapenko's point according to official tennis rules. You can deny it all you want, but it won't change anything. I am still correct and you are wrong.
@einarsd4 Watch the replay, it did not bounce twice. And yes, people's shoes squeak, but not INTENTIONALLY during their opponent's serve. Most shoes squeak because the player is changing position or moving around. Ostapenko stayed in the same place. She did that to throw off the serve.
Azarenka does an unsportsmanlike shriek every single time she hits the ball, who cares about some little squeak.
Ostapenko says she’ll never be on one of her matches again. The chair umpire probably was thinking “If I could ever be that lucky”.
You can tell Penko haters were shoved into lockers and bullied 😂😂
Coco was right. Had the supervisor just been called, the argument would have been ended much earlier.
I also admire her politeness and careful choice of words while clearly being in a very emotional state of mind. 99% of the players would have used derogative words in that situation.
Well, Pliskova's return was on the net when the umpire called out, so it was a shi**y call and a terrible decision to replay the point. But Coco was trying to force a question of rule, when it was a question of fact. Nevertheless, her frustation is totally understandable, the umpire messed up really bad.
He denied her right to see a supervisor. That’s wrong. He was in no position to do that!
The Volynets call was among the all time worst in tennis history. In other news, she's so cute lol. And wow, do I love a feisty Kalinskaya checking Storm at the end! Rude Storm wanted no parts of her haha
Thank you soooo much for the new video. I really missed it and checked so many times looking for a new one :)
🙏💚
Yet again, cleary out but he has to follow the system and the supervisor cannot do anything about the obviously not working system. Well done
That chair umpire for Coco's match is actually braindead. How the hell can the call come at the same time as the return when you're making a correction? In order to make a correction you have to wait and see if the linesman is going to make the call first, and in that time the player has already returned the ball. Absolutely ridiculous.
Two perfect decisions against Ostapenko. And funny enough, even mentioning the overrule decision of the final in Linz. After reviewing it, she still does not accept that the overrule was correctly made after a late call from the line-umpire. The most hilarious remarks is her saying: „You will never work on any of my matches again!“ 😂😂😂 As if she would have a say into that and as if the umpire could not care less.
Ostapenko is the biggest clown on WTA far away
💯
You can also see her from far away
But she's _our_ clown 🥰
@@Zamzummin ayoo pause
Penko haters are so boring 🥱
FINALLY a tennis advocate video, ive been waiting
I always love seeing Ostapenko salty esp when Vika owns her
“I called it straight away” … replay clearly shows umpire calling it out after she hit the ball out.
How do you track all these incidents? Do you just watch this much tennis or do you have a panel of some sort or something else
Si no ves tenis que vas entender, si vieras las payasadas que hace ostapenko jajaajajj son unica y criticable por sus fans..
I mean, just call the damn supervisor, who 99.9% of the time , wont change any ruling made by the umpire 😂😂
Ostapenko is truly the Nick Kyrgios of the WTA, I'm curious that these two are a couple.
Ostapenko es unica...
You can tell Penko haters were shoved into lockers and bullied 😂😂
Coco was right, but damn, repeating the same sentance 50 times gave me a headache
lol its probably because the umpire wasn't understanding or didn't care about what she had to say.
I mean to be fair. If he did just let her talk, and say her piece without chiming in, he probably would’ve understood what she wanted. Playing tennis, or any sport when someone saying their piece to a ref in a respectful manner initially, and they cut them off because they think they already know what’ll come out my their mouth would send someone over the edge
that umpire wang must be blind. how did she not see those two calls 😭
Code violation, unsportsmanlike conduct, default, mr Bacchi.
Can someone please explain to me what the rules say about when you are allowed to challenge? Melichar-Martinez seemed very confident, but I have heard umpires before say you can't wait to see if your shot goes out and then challenge. Does anyone know who is in the right here?
I don’t know the rule but I would say most umpires I’ve seen have acted like this umpire did. Right or wrong it’s consistent and not deserving of penalty. That said, had the player challenged when she saw the ball hit, like most others do, then she would have been correct as the ball was out.
It's pretty easy
Umpire was in the right, because you can challenge shortly after the ball landed out, and if that was the end of a point, you have few seconds to call a challenge.
But in that case that ball was not the end of play, so you have to challenge in an instant, meaning you interrupt the point and call challenge before your shot lands anywhere. In this situation she waited to see if her ball was going out, and when it did she called the challenge. That is not allowed, you cannot decide whether to challenge or not after seeing that you missed the ball, if the ball would be in she would gladly take the point and not challenge it. If you are certain oponent ball was out, you interrupt the point regardless of your shot, she simply didn't and wanted to abuse the system.
It’s literally a contradiction… if your ball doesn’t land it can’t be called out, and if it’s not called out there’s no need to challenge. The umpire was out of her mind trying to use that logic
The thing is the serve was out. Not the shot. If she challenged without following her own ball til it landed out and looked at the serve instead it would've been a challenge 100%. She was too late here
If a ball is out and you want to challenge it, you should raise your hand and stop everything and challenge. What you cannot do is wait for your shot to land to decide if you challenge or not. This was a perfect example: the player waited for her shot to land to challenge. And we all know that if the shot was in, she would not have challenged. So that's perfect logical umpiring.
@Tennis Advocate Thanks for the Video but where is Putintseva?
Haha
🙏💚
Gauff was right about his call, but wrong about calling the supervisor
THANK YOU. I was waiting for this. She was correct in the argument, but the way she argued about it was wrong.
Also, the constant interrupting of him and then yelling "can you not interrupt me for 2 seconds?" I know she's in the right for the call, but to act like that much of a brat over it is just a bad look.
no, they are allowed to ask for a clarification of a rule
@@jbond119 But this wasn't a rule she was asking, it was point of fact. "If he calls early, replay point, and if late, it's her point" is the rule, but she's mad because he didn't agree with her that he called late. The timing of a call is point of fact, not a rule.
@@TheLouzer_ no matter what the ump was wrong about the call. Coco wanted to "clarify" that with the supervisor so she can argue about what happened here. Ump just didn't care and stuck to his stupid "that's how I remember" argument. If it's supposed to be a fact you can't be saying that.
@GdNYa The question she wanted to ask because "she didn't know the rule" was not a rule question. It was an opinion-based question, and wouldn't have changed anything. She wanted to ask "can he call it before or after the play", which is an opinion, not a rule.
If he thought he called that before the hit, he shouldnt be anywhere near an umpire's chair.
Kjendlie never gives Ostapenko any reaction and is sometimes a little passive aggressive back. I absolutely LOVE it. I hope she umpires an Ostapenko match at every slam for the rest of her career 😭 even when Ostapenko is right she’s so awful that I want to disagree with her
You can tell Penko haters were shoved into lockers and bullied 😂😂 Incel 😂
Crybaby Karen 😂😂 Did Penko hurt your feelings 😩😂
I knew Ostapenko would be on the video. lol
That's what pisses me off umpires can make all the mistakes and not take responsibility that they are ruining a match. Gauff had the right to question and the umpire denied her which is bullshit. That umpire sits there no fault or mistakes is on his name and if Guaff does something wrong she gets fined. Shows how unfair sport is which explains why officials can get away with cheating.
Curious why a simple replay access isnt a universal thing - no need for a precise VAR to validate clear outs/ins
Not a fan of Coco but geesus I was fully behind her against that arrogant of an idiot umpire
The Volynets one was soooo ridiculous!
and Coco was right too!
Gauff doing a fair impression of Jeremy Paxman.
My boss asked me the last day why I hadn’t a piece of work done. I told her it was a “question of fact” and she went away. Works a dream everytime.
It's about time a point system existed for umpires and line judges. Some of them need to be demoted to line judges and some line judges need to be released.
The umpire with Volynets is a coward. "I can't do anything." Yes you can. You're the umpire!
Umpire didn’t give a fuck about ostapenko cos she does it all the time 😜
I don’t really understand hunter’s anger about losing that one point, obviously that one point could’ve been the turning point. however, kalinskaya would inevitably win as seen when she won 6-1, 6-2
bacchi’s call during that gauff and pliskova match was terrible
Human: "I can't overrule the system". This is the present, and our future.
Kalinskaya could've been such a good example if she agreed to replay the point. She would've won the set anyway (4-1 up).
Instead she took the point like a coward.
it's not her fault her opponent had a dumb moment
i’m so glad that coco won that match at the end, what a horrible umpire he should lose his job
09:37 WTF????? HOW SAID OUT ?
Coco, eat snickers 😊
But did the umpire apologize to gauff?
Ostapenko is truly a horrible person
Lmao you’re judging her entire being on a short window of time during a high stakes moment. at least she isn’t leaving troll comments online.
@@Conradcoffee be serious. there are hours of footage of her acting like this
@@Conradcoffee and of course Elizabeth Holmes is your avi
@@ilovetati91 lmao Elizabeth Holmes is a horrible person but that has nothing to do with this
You can tell Penko haters were shoved into lockers and bullied 😂😂
How are Bacchi and Wang still reffing? Terrible umpires.
PLOT SUMMARY: Gauff wants to ask her the rule.
I can‘t even be 100% sure in this slowmo that Azarenka‘s ball did not bounce twice, how the hell should the Ref!!!
I was sitting courtside on Azarenkas side, it was clear from my angle that Azarenka got there in time
@@goughmi5430 Well, i agree it looks like she got there in time, but i think there should be a challenge possible, or sth alike…
do a vídeo of the supervisors actually doing something
Terrible decision and behaviour from Bacchi
How about serving when a return player is constantly delaying. The umpires never warns them. Force them to make a desicion.
Glad that Volynets won the game, cause that ball was so far out lol.
Coco was right and wrong. She was right about the call being made after Plishkova hit it but she was wrong about being able to call the Supervisor. The umpire made the ruling (which was wrong) but you can't ask for the supervisor during a point about a rule, you have to wait after the next change over or after the match.
The umpire’s argument against Melichar-Martinez is just bizarre. It sounds like she’s saying you can’t wait for the ball to be called out before you challenge. But how on earth are you supposed to challenge before a call is made?
I don’t really get the fuss over challenging too late at all. Who cares if the challenge comes 1 second after vs 5 seconds after
Melichar-Martinez was challenging the serve, not her shot. Waiting long enough for her next shot, the return, to land and be called out means she's waited too long to challenge the serve.
So if she’s challenging the serve, I can understand the judgement the chair umpire is having. She waited for to see if her return goes out and then made a challenge call. The umpire essentially is saying if your return goes in, you wouldn’t have challenged the serve. She’s thinking that the challenge is being used as a bailout to a poorly hit return
🔝🔝
Ostapenko is always there for the drama.
Anyone know how many times Gauff said the word “supervisor"?
So much support for Gauff. Bacchi sucked here 100%
I want to talk to your manager.
Ostapenko might be the cringiest player to ever step on a tennis court, get in shape instead of crying all over
American social justice warriors made a huge meal of the Coco-Bacchi argument 😃 for regular tennis viewers, that's an argument that happens very often 😂
Whats wrong with the Referees? Not mater female or male, The Server is the boss of the time and when its 4Seconds, THE SERVER IS THE BOSS! TIME VIOLATION! Fact of the Rule
Gauff is such a queen, she sealed with that arrogant man so well
Um she was right but she also diminished her message by the way she delivered it (repeating the same sentence, constantly interrupting, hyperfixating on what ifs, getting rules about calling supervisor wrong)
@@ilovetati91 actually it's you who is wrong about calling a supervisor in that situation there is a reason why Crissie, Andy, and Rennae Stubbs all backed her reaction here.
@@jbond119 first of all, those three are constantly wrong - as are you. you're misunderstanding the rules regardng question of law versus question of fact. you are not owed a referee visit for a question of fact as in this instance. regardless of whether or not the umpire's judgment was correct.
@@ilovetati91 Hey, Chris Evert, Andy Roddick, and Rennae Stubbs (7 doubles) (with 26 Grand Slam titles among them) are often wrong, but you're right, huh? That's quite something!
@@joelmvdqp Directly from the player handbook: "In matches where a chair umpire is assigned, the chair umpire is the final authority on all questions of fact during the match. The players have the right to call the referee to court if they disagree with a chair umpire’s interpretation of tennis law." This was a question of fact, for which the umpire is the final authority. As I said, those commentators are constantly wrong despite their on-court credentials.
This whole you waited to long to challenge bullshit. It should be 3 challenges per set no questions asked. Who gives af if they wait for their ball to go out before they challenge? It would save way more time if they just did the challenge and got on with it. I don't care if I played the ball. If the shot prior was out it's my fucking point. Hell if the rally went for 15 shots and I wanted to challenge their second shot in the rally and it's out it's my point. Out is out
Did the umpire apologized to Gauff????
w
Players have a nice sportsmanship only when on the other side is a friend so they can't demand another behaviour from the opponent since they do the same.
Coco was absolutely right and she has her right to call the supervisor.
Goddamn Allison Hughes has gotten massive. She was always heavy but wow
I love the iconic & fabulously fair Allison Hughes, but she's getting way too big. I'm concerned for her movement in and out of the chair. We've got to get her some Ozempic or whatever they use these days. Now, where are my brownies & chips... nom nom!
I love how Kalinskaya said. Yes I am!
Not her problem. No need for storm to confront her. It was her own mistake and umpires decision.
Electronic Line Calling at every hard court tournament would be so much more better for the sport. But then again, we wouldn’t get this content from TA otherwise. 😂
And yet electronic line calling caused issue in this very video.
.
Coco gauff was 100% right but at some point just need to move on and just play you will never win an argument against a referee anyway
The way I would have gotten violent towards that umpire after repeating the same thing over and over, Gauff is stronger than me 😂also are there any repercussions for inaccurate calls especially when they refuse to call the supervisor or reverse the decision cause a sorry cannot be enough
Sounds like you need a therapist then
Coco was right!!!
Ostapenko, watch your diet first, then try to play proper tennis, then argue if you want to.
Replace Gauff for someone like Federer or Nadal or Djoko and that supervisor is there in 10 secs.
Women getting a lot more uppity
90% of the time I agree with the umpires but I think that number is dropping pretty quickly now