Is the NRA Being Sued Out of Existence? | LegalEagle’s Real Law Review

แชร์
ฝัง
  • เผยแพร่เมื่อ 18 ส.ค. 2020
  • ⚖️ Do you need a great lawyer? I can help! legaleagle.link/eagleteam ⚖️
    Is New York really going to dissolve the National Rifle Association? Can they do that?
    Get DEEP SENTINEL, the only security system with real human guards watching your cameras in real-time and get 15% off! www.deepsentinel.com/legaleagle/
    ⚖️⚖️⚖️Interested in LAW SCHOOL? Get my PRELAW COURSE:
    legaleagle.teachable.com/p/pr...
    ©©©©© Need help with COPYRIGHT? I built a course just for you (15% OFF!):
    www.copyrightcourse.com/yt
    ★ A Few of My Favorite Things★
    🕵️♂️My Custom Suits: legaleagle.link/indochino
    👔My Ties: fave.co/2ImLY9I
    📎My Tie Clips/Bars: amzn.to/2WIQ6EE
    🔲My Pocket Squares: amzn.to/2UfsKtL
    💈My Hair Product amzn.to/2Ui2aQx
    📸My Video Camera Setup www.amazon.com/shop/legaleagle
    -------------------------------------------------------------------------------
    Welcome to Real Law Review by LegalEagle; a series where I try to tackle the most important legal issues of the day. If you have a suggestion for the next topic leave your comment below.
    And if you disagree, be sure to leave your comment in the form of an OBJECTION!
    Remember to make your comments Stella-appropriate. Stella is the LegalBeagle and she wields the gavel of justice. DO NOT MESS WITH STELLA.
    ★More series on LegalEagle★
    Real Lawyer Reacts: goo.gl/hw9vcE
    Laws Broken: goo.gl/PJw3vK
    Law 101: goo.gl/rrzFw3
    Real Law Review: goo.gl/NHUoqc
    All clips used for fair use commentary, criticism, and educational purposes. See Hosseinzadeh v. Klein, 276 F.Supp.3d 34 (S.D.N.Y. 2017); Equals Three, LLC v. Jukin Media, Inc., 139 F. Supp. 3d 1094 (C.D. Cal. 2015).
    Typical legal disclaimer from a lawyer (occupational hazard): This is not legal advice, nor can I give you legal advice. Sorry! Everything here is for informational purposes only and not for the purpose of providing legal advice. You should contact your attorney to obtain advice with respect to any particular issue or problem. Nothing here should be construed to form an attorney-client relationship. Also, some of the links in this post may be affiliate links, meaning, at no cost to you, I will earn a small commission if you click through and make a purchase. But if you click, it really helps me make more of these videos!
    ========================================================
    ★ Tweet me @legaleagleDJ / legaleagledj
    ★ More vids on Facebook: ➜ / legaleaglereacts
    ★ Stella’s Insta: / stellathelegalbeagle
    ★ For promotional inquiries please reach out here: legaleagle@standard.tv

ความคิดเห็น • 5K

  • @LegalEagle
    @LegalEagle  3 ปีที่แล้ว +284

    ⚖️ What do you think about the NRA?
    🚨 Get DEEP SENTINEL, for 15% off (exclusively here!) www.deepsentinel.com/legaleagle/

    • @bezretmet
      @bezretmet 3 ปีที่แล้ว +39

      Trump mail fraud attack video next! Is the postmaster really within his rights with what he's doing? we must know!

    • @Digitalhunny
      @Digitalhunny 3 ปีที่แล้ว +12

      Question for you, pretty please. What is the _proper_ way to say the past tense of entering a plea, in court? Is it:
      1. She _pleaded_ not guilty, on Monday. Or
      2. She _pled_ not guilty, on Monday.
      Number 1. hits my ear wrong.

    • @Best2cents
      @Best2cents 3 ปีที่แล้ว +9

      Digitalhunny she pled

    • @thomascoolidge2161
      @thomascoolidge2161 3 ปีที่แล้ว +37

      The NRA was a great organization until it became a lobbying firm for gun manufacturers. Honestly if it returned to its roots it would probably almost remove the need for most of the gun control laws.

    • @Best2cents
      @Best2cents 3 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      I remember hearing back in 2017 that charity organizations was used to influence the electoral college via donations, is this possible given Hillary won with over 3 mil votes? Thx Penny instructor@ofsre.com Love your channel 👏

  • @TalonSky
    @TalonSky 3 ปีที่แล้ว +1197

    As someone very much on the left, if the ACLU was accused of doing the things the NRA has done, you're darn shootin' that I would support them being held accountable and dissolved if need be. Justice is justice, and political views shouldn't play a part in it.

    • @timothyhayes9724
      @timothyhayes9724 3 ปีที่แล้ว +58

      Bless you for your leveled headed approach

    • @boriskoblents8586
      @boriskoblents8586 3 ปีที่แล้ว +25

      how disappointing it would be to learn planned parenthood was stealing millions in funds.

    • @GameByGame
      @GameByGame 3 ปีที่แล้ว +14

      ACLU is not really a left-wing organisation... (Nor is the NRA right wing)

    • @ericeaton2386
      @ericeaton2386 3 ปีที่แล้ว +143

      @@GameByGame Uhhhhh. The NRA spent $30 million dollars in 2016 supporting Trump's campaign. (And that's not even including their other lobbying, like the millions they spend lobbying against stricter background checks.) That puts them pretty squarely on the right.
      By contrast, in 2016, the ACLU spent less than $1 million lobbying, almost all of that going to bills that restrict civil liberties. You could say they're politically active, but they're not obviously left (unless you wanted to argue that civil rights are "left," lol).

    • @GameByGame
      @GameByGame 3 ปีที่แล้ว +6

      @@ericeaton2386 Trump is not right wing

  • @shmoeg
    @shmoeg 3 ปีที่แล้ว +1003

    I saw someone say this and I think it hits the nail on the head:
    *The NRA represents gun manufacturers, not gun owners.*

    • @LJCyrus1
      @LJCyrus1 3 ปีที่แล้ว +21

      It both represents and serves as a direct focused advertising method.

    • @timinator20o0
      @timinator20o0 3 ปีที่แล้ว +4

      ohhhh. Hm. Thankyou.

    • @kohinarec6580
      @kohinarec6580 3 ปีที่แล้ว +6

      Well, aren't gun owners the focus group for gun manufacturers?

    • @shmoeg
      @shmoeg 3 ปีที่แล้ว +4

      @@kohinarec6580 how does that relate to what I just said?

    • @MiketheNerdRanger
      @MiketheNerdRanger 3 ปีที่แล้ว +3

      @@kohinarec6580 how does that mean gun owners are the focus group for the NRA? The manufacturers aren't the ones being shot for legally owning a gun.

  • @AxelQC
    @AxelQC 3 ปีที่แล้ว +301

    If I supported a political charity, and its leaders outright stole my money, I'd be mad as hell and want them arrested and the institution dissolved.

    • @rationalobserver3675
      @rationalobserver3675 3 ปีที่แล้ว +15

      I highly doubt that. The normal response would be to get mad at the administration and want their removal.
      If the higher ups at any political charity you support were accused of similar charges you're actually saying you would want the entire charity dissolved? I think you're full of it

    • @IncognitoSprax
      @IncognitoSprax 3 ปีที่แล้ว +11

      @@rationalobserver3675 "The normal response," accord to whom?

    • @orwellianhater4014
      @orwellianhater4014 2 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      Then you are all for dissolving BLM.

    • @gaminawulfsdottir3253
      @gaminawulfsdottir3253 2 ปีที่แล้ว +4

      And then there's that whole "accepting (lots of) money from a hostile foreign power" thing...

    • @BooserBoi
      @BooserBoi 2 ปีที่แล้ว +2

      @@IncognitoSprax according to any reasonable person.

  • @javonism7746
    @javonism7746 3 ปีที่แล้ว +864

    I love how white collar crime can still hundreds of millions of dollars and get a slap on the wrist. but if a poor person steals $500 and they get the book thrown at them 🤣😂

    • @TheWatchfulWolf
      @TheWatchfulWolf 3 ปีที่แล้ว +192

      Advantages of having money. As disgusting as it is, a poor man works his ass off to make 500$ a week and he's lazy for only working 60 hours a week. Wealthy man has employees do most of the work for him, makes 500$ an hour and 'he earned it.' It's how our society has been conditioned over time.

    • @jimchase3601
      @jimchase3601 3 ปีที่แล้ว +50

      You mean like the white collar crime found in the corporate America? You know, the ones that don't pay taxes and dictate to the Senate and Congress?

    • @jimchase3601
      @jimchase3601 3 ปีที่แล้ว +2

      @@TheWatchfulWolf Then there's the educated that make more and are not Trumpers.

    • @TheWatchfulWolf
      @TheWatchfulWolf 3 ปีที่แล้ว +26

      @@jimchase3601 I don't make more. And I'm not a Trumper. Are you implying being educated means you make more? Nnnot always. Not even usually. Just on average.

    • @jimchase3601
      @jimchase3601 3 ปีที่แล้ว +10

      @@TheWatchfulWolf I'm not implying anything. I'm stating Constitutionalists (second amenders) and Trumpers are basically ignorant and or cowards as a rule.

  • @andrasbiro3007
    @andrasbiro3007 3 ปีที่แล้ว +695

    It's funny how Rudy Giuliani went for a personal attack instantly. And he did it the most ironic way possible, as he was fired from his job for being a bad lawyer, then he became Trump's lawyer and continued to be exceptionally bad at his job.

    • @MultiMcgruber
      @MultiMcgruber 3 ปีที่แล้ว +15

      OOf, didn't even remember that, irony indeed.

    • @10kreviews2020
      @10kreviews2020 3 ปีที่แล้ว +4

      All true, but that makes him an EXPERT on bad lawyers! /s

    • @scunts
      @scunts 3 ปีที่แล้ว +7

      And interview of Rudy, on FOX news. I think only one side of information will ever pass though that mess.

    • @mikewaterfield3599
      @mikewaterfield3599 3 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      never underestimate how much influence one can have over trump for the price of good fellatio.

    • @scunts
      @scunts 3 ปีที่แล้ว

      @@mikewaterfield3599 A sucky is a sucky tbf

  • @thedebatehitman
    @thedebatehitman 3 ปีที่แล้ว +842

    That people are even attempting to defend the NRA’s recent activities troubles me. Financial misconduct is pretty black-and-white and evident to anyone who cares to investigate the matters for himself/herself.
    Firearms enthusiasts need to realize that the NRA is not the Second Amendment. They can support the Second Amendment while denouncing the NRA’s recent conduct.

    • @kavinh10
      @kavinh10 3 ปีที่แล้ว +10

      enemy of my enemy is my friend rings true here. Those people don't care about the NRA's actions and you can't even blame them because they feel attacked from the other side, so why throw to the wolves someone who seemingly is on the same side as them.
      same thing happens on the left all the time.

    • @yunikage
      @yunikage 3 ปีที่แล้ว +49

      ​@@kavinh10 when does that ever happen on the left? as soon as somebody on the left crosses the line they get thrown to the wolves, to use your metaphor.
      do you mean liberals?

    • @tessat338
      @tessat338 3 ปีที่แล้ว +45

      Especially because it is the gun owner's money that the NRA leadership is accused of misappropriating. Politics aside, do they really want their hard-earned money to fund these guys' lavish lifestyle?

    • @edm240b9
      @edm240b9 3 ปีที่แล้ว +19

      There are many firearm enthusiasts that back what the NRA stands for, but do also hate how the current organization works. IE, keep the organization, liquidate the owners. I heard the same thing was done to the Wounded Warrior’s project.

    • @TheGreatDrAsian
      @TheGreatDrAsian 3 ปีที่แล้ว +32

      Basically the only people who still back the NRA are out of touch Boomers who aren't up to date on modern affairs and can't be bothered to learn.
      Everyone else who supports the 2nd Amendment knows the NRA is a corrupt shitstorm that hurts gun culture.

  • @ChristianSandviknes
    @ChristianSandviknes 3 ปีที่แล้ว +288

    "Poor excuse for a lawyer" didn't age very well after Trump lost.

    • @CapitalistSpy
      @CapitalistSpy 3 ปีที่แล้ว +2

      😃🤣

    • @ForrestFox626
      @ForrestFox626 3 ปีที่แล้ว +23

      It was aged poorly the second it came out of Rudy's mouth

    • @moopert86
      @moopert86 3 ปีที่แล้ว +6

      It was obviously a pot kettle situation well before that.

    • @trumptard4135
      @trumptard4135 3 ปีที่แล้ว +3

      tump dodnt lost!
      TRUMP 202ß!!!

    • @timinator20o0
      @timinator20o0 3 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      now it's even worse. holy crap. lol. when does it stop? 🤣

  • @Williamfuchs420
    @Williamfuchs420 3 ปีที่แล้ว +195

    Anybody else Laugh audibly out loud when Rudi questioned her ability as a lawyer. Thats like a penny questioning the worth of a 20$ bill

    • @Buglin_Burger7878
      @Buglin_Burger7878 3 ปีที่แล้ว

      But the worth of it is completely subjective... you could flip their worth and things would continue as normal. People would just throw their 20$ Bills away and keep their pennies.

    • @neutrino78x
      @neutrino78x ปีที่แล้ว +4

      @@Buglin_Burger7878 Rudy's lack of value is far from subjective at this point lmao

    • @LordPadriac
      @LordPadriac ปีที่แล้ว +2

      Okay this just annoys the hell out of me but the goddamn dollar sign goes BEFORE the number, not after.

  • @drewmqn
    @drewmqn 3 ปีที่แล้ว +688

    I bought an NRA lifetime membership when still in college, but I regret it now. Their apathy towards legal gun owners of color in fatal police encounters has shown me their true loyalties aren't with gun owners.

    • @UndyingNero
      @UndyingNero 3 ปีที่แล้ว +127

      True they are supposed to be pro gun owner and defending yourself like with Breonna Taylor's boyfriend. But instead have not said a word about it. It really drives home the point that they just pray upon stupid gun owners and trying to trick people into giving them money under the guise of "protecting your rights"

    • @omnie22
      @omnie22 3 ปีที่แล้ว +23

      this is probably a dumb question but how does a lifetime membership for them work? do you get some kind of discount and a penalty if you cancel? or is it a one time payment?

    • @stufffstufffington
      @stufffstufffington 3 ปีที่แล้ว +88

      Exactly this. I'm a gun owner and die hard supporter of the 2nd amendment. I hate the NRA. They're a racist organization and only seem to care about your gun rights if you are a white conservative

    • @Proamjoe
      @Proamjoe 3 ปีที่แล้ว +82

      Remember that time when groups of armed black panthers assembled in Oakland neighborhoods to oversee police conduct that directly lead to the NRA endorsing gun ownership restrictions being passed in the state of California... in 1967.

    • @sloppyjoes7
      @sloppyjoes7 3 ปีที่แล้ว +8

      The NRA is has no apathy to "gun owners of color."

  • @bg6b7bft
    @bg6b7bft 3 ปีที่แล้ว +382

    If I was donating to a non-profit over something I cared deeply about, I would want it dissolved if its president was spending my donations on hookers and blow.
    The NY AG is doing a favor to gun rights activists. Activists donating to the NRA were basically setting their money on fire while thinking they were advancing gun rights.
    Once the NRA is dissolved, the activists can establish a new non-profit that more effectively leverages their donations.

    • @malcolmholmes2596
      @malcolmholmes2596 3 ปีที่แล้ว +9

      I prefer my hookers with blackjack

    • @Jawmax
      @Jawmax 3 ปีที่แล้ว +3

      Like I asked someone else, will it be in time? The left will pounce on this while a new non-profit is established. By the time things get going legal gun ownership could be an extreme rarity. I'm worried.

    • @darthplagueis13
      @darthplagueis13 3 ปีที่แล้ว +31

      @@Jawmax That assumes that the NRA is the main reason why there aren't more restrictive gun laws in the US. Besides, the Senate still has a republican conservative majority and so does in fact the Supreme Court, so I don't see any stricter regulations happening anytime soon, even without the support of a corrupt but rich lobby group.

    • @aeonamadi
      @aeonamadi 3 ปีที่แล้ว +29

      @@Jawmax The greatest marketing tactic is scaring someone into thinking your product won't be available anymore. When the Obama gun grab scare happened we saw record gun sales across the country. Despite the fear, the only legislation passed on a national level was stricter regulations for the ATF, increased statistical tracking for the NICS, and a safe/responsible gun ownership guide being issued to gun store owners.
      No-one is going to take your guns. They're just marketing fear tactics to get you to buy more of them.

    • @jeckjeck3119
      @jeckjeck3119 3 ปีที่แล้ว +4

      @@darthplagueis13
      It is possible... but come on. Dems are willfully incompetent. They will not pass anything substantial on 2nd amendment.

  • @thatjeff7550
    @thatjeff7550 3 ปีที่แล้ว +204

    "You know it's 2020 when Oliver Frickin' North is the whistleblower...." HAHAHAHAHA!!!! Oh boy, I'm showing my age.

    • @danballe
      @danballe 3 ปีที่แล้ว +7

      Dont worry dude, nobody NOBODY gets any younger!

    • @raybin6873
      @raybin6873 3 ปีที่แล้ว +2

      You very old Fart you! 😆

    • @blackcountryme
      @blackcountryme 3 ปีที่แล้ว +9

      When I heard his name it was like "Hang on, I recognise that name.." I was a kid when the Iran contra affair was all over the news, even here in the UK

    • @EthosAtheos
      @EthosAtheos 3 ปีที่แล้ว +6

      I prefer Oliver War Criminal North, but Frickin' is not to bad either.

    • @militustoica
      @militustoica 3 ปีที่แล้ว +5

      When I saw his name on their letterhead I had to triple take then go make sure it was the same one from my high school history textbooks on the Iran-Contra scandal

  • @gonk1718
    @gonk1718 3 ปีที่แล้ว +48

    Giuliani: she's a poor excuse of a lawyer
    Post election 2020: oh how the turn tables

    • @BoundlessEnnui
      @BoundlessEnnui 3 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      I guess you gotta be one to know one, or projection

  • @slightlycrookedworkshop
    @slightlycrookedworkshop 3 ปีที่แล้ว +2159

    Rudy Giuliani calling someone "a poor excuse for a lawyer" is the epitome of irony. He's the type of attorney that will turn your parking ticket into a murder charge.
    Edit: I'd like to point out how well this comment has aged.

    • @slightlycrookedworkshop
      @slightlycrookedworkshop 3 ปีที่แล้ว +148

      @@Unit-kp8wm I don't see what that has to do with how he handles current legal situations.

    • @Nevertoleave
      @Nevertoleave 3 ปีที่แล้ว +62

      I still find it funny that he butt dialed a reporter

    • @lameduck1690
      @lameduck1690 3 ปีที่แล้ว +7

      @Nospam Spamisham She was chosen because she is in with all the big donors, not because she's black. She brings huge amounts of money to Biden's campaign.

    • @slightlycrookedworkshop
      @slightlycrookedworkshop 3 ปีที่แล้ว +30

      @Nospam Spamisham What does that have to do with Rudy Giuliani?

    • @mothman7270
      @mothman7270 3 ปีที่แล้ว +72

      @Nospam Spamisham 1) You're completely correct about Harris (good job)
      2) It's almost a fact Biden choose her because she is a POC woman but that's more of a reflection of Biden's creepiness than anything else, and focusing on that definitely makes you come off as a racist.
      3) I can't even begin to comprehend the fantasy world you live in that makes you think that black people will join the republican party when the party's current position is to support the systematic murder of black people.
      4) This has absolutely nothing to do with Rudy Giuliani and bringing up the obvious faults of the Democratic party to draw attention away from the faults of the republican party is the very definition of a red herring.

  • @TheNeverposts
    @TheNeverposts 3 ปีที่แล้ว +455

    Imagine being accused of fraud by Oliver North

    • @Comicsluvr
      @Comicsluvr 3 ปีที่แล้ว +38

      Like Charles Manson accusing you of being anti-social...

    • @commondirtbagz7130
      @commondirtbagz7130 3 ปีที่แล้ว +26

      @@Comicsluvr or Harvey Weinstein accusing you of being a perv

    • @bulwinkle
      @bulwinkle 3 ปีที่แล้ว +3

      Poacher turned gamekeeper.

    • @GarthTheMighty
      @GarthTheMighty 3 ปีที่แล้ว +21

      Imagine being *correctly* accused of fraud by Oliver North.

    • @Comicsluvr
      @Comicsluvr 3 ปีที่แล้ว +3

      @@GarthTheMighty IKR?

  • @danielchand944
    @danielchand944 3 ปีที่แล้ว +371

    Re: Your question, “Would you support the dissolution of liberal charities that engaged in fraudulent activities?” (4:15 minutes.) Well, Acorn was dissolved for far less than what the NRA is accused of; and I was fine with that. So yes.

    • @astaiannymph
      @astaiannymph 3 ปีที่แล้ว +52

      Definitely, because I'd worry that there would be no way to trust an organization if it were proven to have the level of corruption or fraud even half of what is alleged for the NRA.

    • @victoriae725
      @victoriae725 3 ปีที่แล้ว +26

      Exactly. This is why I'm not a fan of charity companies. You'd do much more good helping out smaller organizations in your community. At least if the leaders of the smaller communities are fraudulent, they'll have to face their donators every time they walk in a grocery store. 😂

    • @zkeletonz001
      @zkeletonz001 3 ปีที่แล้ว +13

      The alleged victims in this case are the members of NRA themselves, to dissolve the organization would be punishing the victims. The attorneys at the Southern District of New York are notoriously politically motivated. They don't care about the member of the NRA they just want to destroy the NRA itself.

    • @NightRogue77
      @NightRogue77 3 ปีที่แล้ว +18

      Zkeleton Z since the NRA serves no good purpose, i have no issue with it.

    • @bobby8012
      @bobby8012 3 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      What about we dissolve BLM Instead, they're one of the most corrupt organizations but no one bats a eye

  • @AtmaDragoon
    @AtmaDragoon 3 ปีที่แล้ว +51

    "Stop crime before it happens."
    *Minority Report Intensifies*

  • @emilyz4104
    @emilyz4104 3 ปีที่แล้ว +492

    It's weird to me that many people who claim to care about Second Amendment advocacy are still supporting an organization that took money for that purpose and then spent it all on luxury trips instead.

    • @SynchronizorVideos
      @SynchronizorVideos 3 ปีที่แล้ว +48

      The NRA gets a TON of its income from corporate donors, deals from manufacturers & commercial outfits, advertising, and other larger-scale programs. Among individual gun owners, they've lost a huge amount of respect and support. Even in the early 2010s, actual member fees represented a minority of the organizations income, and support has only dropped more since then. They're pretty much a joke among gun owners these days.

    • @destynova4512
      @destynova4512 3 ปีที่แล้ว +40

      I'm super Pro 2A and I hate the NRA, they are too busy lining their pockets than actually fighting Unconstitutional gun laws. Though their gun safety services are pretty good. Children and younger people definitely need more of that than just fear mongering against guns. Far better to teach a kid how it works and proper safety than just teaching them guns are scary and call the cops if you see one. Would definitely cut down on accidents and negligence.

    • @Ivytheherbert
      @Ivytheherbert 3 ปีที่แล้ว +8

      For some of them the second amendment is just an excuse. They like the NRA funneling lobbying money to their favorite political team, nothing more.

    • @jasonr8967
      @jasonr8967 3 ปีที่แล้ว +9

      @Xukuth Waldo Is it the gun or the context around it? People focus on the gun, but ignore the context. If an armed, uniformed police officer is at a school, no one even thinks about it. Why should it be any different for a father in his truck waiting to pick up his child in the afternoon? Why should a man go to prison because he had a handgun in his glovebox while on normal business? Now it is different if someone has a weapon drawn and is walking like they are on a mission. That is definitely something to pay attention to.
      Context is king.

    • @MrSlowestD16
      @MrSlowestD16 3 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      They do it because they know individual voices have no power. If the NRA was to go away the left would bring in massive gun legislation which [they believe] won't affect criminals obtaining illegal guns and committing crimes (because the left would be afraid of disproportionately affecting minorities) but would have a heavy impact on legal gun owners doing nothing wrong.
      .
      The right believes that the left will never bring up legislation that will curb real gun violence, only legislation that will curb legal gun owners from owning guns - so they end up being against all legislation. Having a big organization like the NRA in your corner helps mitigate that and only allow valid legislation, like the bump stock ban signed by Trump, which was supported by the NRA. Without that, they fear draconian legislation. So yeah, they'll support the NRA even if they know the NRA is corrupt, just like the left would support planned parenthood unconditionally, even though there's been lots of reports of "luxury expenditures" on higher ups.

  • @LilleTotte
    @LilleTotte 3 ปีที่แล้ว +200

    2:30 "She's a poor excuse for a lawyer, anyway", a brave statement by Rudy "probably the worst lawyer of all time" Giuliani.

    • @TheWatchfulWolf
      @TheWatchfulWolf 3 ปีที่แล้ว +9

      Y'know, I'm not up to date with the news, but I kinda perked up when I heard that name. When someone like me knows your name it's probably not a good sign.

    • @SportyMabamba
      @SportyMabamba 3 ปีที่แล้ว +11

      Rudy “soon to be debarred” Giuliani

    • @TheWatchfulWolf
      @TheWatchfulWolf 3 ปีที่แล้ว +5

      @@SportyMabamba If he were a candy, he'd be flavored as rotten tomato. Mmm.

    • @Johno3998
      @Johno3998 3 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      this aged well

    • @TheWatchfulWolf
      @TheWatchfulWolf 3 ปีที่แล้ว +3

      @@Johno3998 It rather did, didn't it. Rudy keeps coming unhinged in court. It's funny.

  • @sarahevans9530
    @sarahevans9530 2 ปีที่แล้ว +22

    The clip of Rudy Giuliani calling Tish James "a poor excuse for a lawyer" aged EXCELLENTLY 😂

  • @WTFisTingispingis
    @WTFisTingispingis 3 ปีที่แล้ว +24

    The funniest part about this has to be OLIVER NORTH of all people calling someone a crook.

  • @JABRIEL251
    @JABRIEL251 3 ปีที่แล้ว +1049

    The "thoughts and prayers" opening made me smile from end to end.

    • @kasnitch
      @kasnitch 3 ปีที่แล้ว +25

      instant cheshire :)

    • @omgitzducki
      @omgitzducki 3 ปีที่แล้ว +23

      I had to pause it just to appreciate the flipping beauty of that line!!!!!!!

    • @uniquechannelnames
      @uniquechannelnames 3 ปีที่แล้ว +17

      From ass to mouth? Lol just kidding, but that's what you made me think.

    • @TheTrainwreckTV
      @TheTrainwreckTV 3 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      Recycled Anthony Jeselnik joke...

    • @sophiophiliaphilosophia9664
      @sophiophiliaphilosophia9664 3 ปีที่แล้ว +6

      @@uniquechannelnames YOU NEVER GO ASS TO MOUTH!

  • @cre-k8-ive
    @cre-k8-ive 3 ปีที่แล้ว +429

    AG: We are unbiased and just doing this to enforce the law.
    NRA: This is politics and you just hate us!
    To quote the well known genius Jake Peralta, "Stuff can be two things."

    • @joshuahudgins
      @joshuahudgins 3 ปีที่แล้ว +2

      That is the problem should bad guys be prosecuted. Sure. Should the NRA go away no.

    • @Sorcerers_Apprentice
      @Sorcerers_Apprentice 3 ปีที่แล้ว +37

      If I found out a non-profit for a cause I cared deeply about was wasting the money I donated to them on hookers and blow, I'd at least want my money back and the non-profit dissolved.
      Prosecuting who ever approved the embezzlement too would be nice.

    • @joshuahudgins
      @joshuahudgins 3 ปีที่แล้ว +2

      @@Sorcerers_Apprentice That is all that needs done. Dissolving them is just a way of getting at the whole group.

    • @Sorcerers_Apprentice
      @Sorcerers_Apprentice 3 ปีที่แล้ว +18

      @@joshuahudgins The state's strategy is being designed to keep all the corrupt members from ever serving on the board of another non-profit or charity ever again, as they should.

    • @joshuahudgins
      @joshuahudgins 3 ปีที่แล้ว +2

      @@Sorcerers_Apprentice Not a requirement to shut down the NRA.

  • @Xeth247
    @Xeth247 3 ปีที่แล้ว +22

    This guy has the smoothest transitions into advertisements. It is amazing.

  • @Blake_the_Drake
    @Blake_the_Drake 3 ปีที่แล้ว +10

    As an NRA member, I'm fine with it going away or getting smaller, there are other groups out there that care much more about protecting our second amendment right, such as the GOA, and the NRA going away means tons of money going to them instead.

    • @gageamonette5120
      @gageamonette5120 3 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      yeah I'd much rather see the GOA take the NRA's place

  • @XxThunderflamexX
    @XxThunderflamexX 3 ปีที่แล้ว +280

    "It's perfectly possible for two things to be true at the same time: the NRA is thoroughly corrupt and the NYAG's action is motivated by political animus" This sounds like a great argument for having a democracy - the political bias of one individual would then have minimal impact on policy decisions.
    Sure would be nice to have.

    • @dillonhounshell9786
      @dillonhounshell9786 3 ปีที่แล้ว +41

      However, regardless of the bias that might be present, if there is a crime committed, you act upon it.
      The NRA leaders are effectively committing fraud.

    • @robspiess
      @robspiess 3 ปีที่แล้ว +10

      Wow, what a thought... maybe having `the people` choose a leader from `the people` instead of assuming leadership from an explicit subset of rich elites could help this demo.

    • @curedbytheonomy
      @curedbytheonomy 3 ปีที่แล้ว +4

      Great idea! Then the 51% can exercise their tyrannical majority over the 49%. Democracy is not freedom. Democracy is three wolves and a sheep deciding what’s for dinner. That’s why, if there must be a federal, centralized government, a Republican (and an electoral college) is so important. Simply because there are more wolves than sheep does not mean the wolves should be entitled to enact every machination of their wills against the sheep. The sheep should have equal choice in policy decisions.

    • @Iosifavich
      @Iosifavich 3 ปีที่แล้ว +3

      If individuals committed crimes the AG could goes after those individuals, seeking disillusion of the NRA is a drastic solution.
      For example what if this was the ACLU, would it be more appropriate to prosecute the people that committed fraud and stole from the member or dissolve the entire organization.

    • @O1OO1O1
      @O1OO1O1 3 ปีที่แล้ว +16

      @@curedbytheonomy why does an electoral college equate to equal choice? From what I understand of it, it creates the opposite.

  • @jessinoan
    @jessinoan 3 ปีที่แล้ว +220

    I’m here for the high levels of sass. Learning about the law is a side benefit.

    • @alexisflory6496
      @alexisflory6496 3 ปีที่แล้ว +3

      I'm debating whether the title belongs to Crowley of supernatural or if it should be handed off to LegalEagle. Cause before I found this chanel Crowley was the only King of Sass that I knew of. 😂

    • @kayleearafinwiel8186
      @kayleearafinwiel8186 3 ปีที่แล้ว

      @@alexisflory6496 both is good

    • @Iansco1
      @Iansco1 3 ปีที่แล้ว

      @@alexisflory6496 Techncially, an earlier Mark Shepherd character holds that. James Sterling on Leverage

    • @JaelinBezel
      @JaelinBezel 2 ปีที่แล้ว

      @@Iansco1 I’ve seen a few episodes of that but I’m not sure which character that is. I wanna say the Hacker man?

    • @Iansco1
      @Iansco1 2 ปีที่แล้ว

      @@JaelinBezel no. It was a recurring character. Was in the last 2 of season 1. A few after that. Same actor as Crowley on supernatural.

  • @ReyosBlackwood
    @ReyosBlackwood 3 ปีที่แล้ว +18

    2:32 Rudy calling someone a poor excuse for a lawyer is rich.

    • @MarkSmith-fe5fr
      @MarkSmith-fe5fr 2 ปีที่แล้ว

      Lol yea it is considering that she is still an actual lawyer and he is not !

  • @MrSaundersc
    @MrSaundersc 3 ปีที่แล้ว +39

    Rudy: "Shes a poor excuse for a lawyer."
    Also Rudy: *farts on national television*

    • @njdaveg2
      @njdaveg2 3 ปีที่แล้ว

      What does farting have to do with anything? You dont fart? You never farted during something important to you?

    • @MrSaundersc
      @MrSaundersc 3 ปีที่แล้ว +4

      @@njdaveg2 I've never farted on national television that's for sure.

    • @marcushendriksen8415
      @marcushendriksen8415 ปีที่แล้ว

      Lmao, I'd do it on purpose just for a laugh. Then again, I wouldn't be masquerading as a competent lawyer

  • @mikepotts52
    @mikepotts52 3 ปีที่แล้ว +184

    Negotiating Rights Away. Theyve NEVER helped gun rights. EVER.

    • @TheMelnTeam
      @TheMelnTeam 3 ปีที่แล้ว +25

      You can make a case that it was a legit organization at its time of founding. I'm not sure anybody alive remembers the last time it was though.

    • @alienbob21
      @alienbob21 3 ปีที่แล้ว

      it is their selling point. They have it all over everything. Literally 2nd Amendment pride all over every piece of everything

    • @mikepotts52
      @mikepotts52 3 ปีที่แล้ว +14

      @@alienbob21 No, theyre a Fudd organization. Youre not familiar with their actual actions in the last, oh, pick a number of decades. They take money from gullible hopeful fools and they sell them out to the politician that will offer Wayney boy the most money in funds/favors. Those suits and dinners dont buy themselves. They are the reason for the NFA. They seek to take 100% of the credit for creating NICS as well. All of which are in direct violation of our rights. Theyre as antigun as the current RINO in office now. Fear and panic pushers at best, sellouts throughout.

    • @jasonalbert6251
      @jasonalbert6251 3 ปีที่แล้ว

      mikepotts52
      The NRA is anti gun rights? Oh, how I wish that were true.

    • @mikepotts52
      @mikepotts52 3 ปีที่แล้ว +7

      @@jasonalbert6251 Thats what I said. Their actions have proven it every single year for decades. Theyre fudds. Which is absolutely worthless to us. Theyre a cancer that feeds off the gun community. Compare their actions to GOA and GOA has done more for our rights in the last few years than NRA has attempted to in 2 decades.

  • @ckind2098
    @ckind2098 3 ปีที่แล้ว +44

    hearing the NRA described as a charity gives me physical pain

    • @ethanpoole3443
      @ethanpoole3443 3 ปีที่แล้ว +2

      It is very much a charity...if your name happens to be Wayne LaPierre as it is his own personal piggy bank.

    • @10kreviews2020
      @10kreviews2020 3 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      I think he was being charitable... I'll see myself out.

    • @VolvoxSocks
      @VolvoxSocks 3 ปีที่แล้ว

      They do support the free distribution of bullets to the general public...

    • @mikewaterfield3599
      @mikewaterfield3599 3 ปีที่แล้ว

      kinda how i feel about the NAACP

  • @mattkleman7876
    @mattkleman7876 3 ปีที่แล้ว +14

    Did anyone else notice when he said “rational” instead of “national” when he was reading? Reverse Freud slip?

  • @user-lp3ew1xb5u
    @user-lp3ew1xb5u 3 ปีที่แล้ว +4

    I’m ashamed to admit, I never knew they were a charity.

  • @plucas1
    @plucas1 3 ปีที่แล้ว +254

    There are other, much better organizations like the GOA or the Second Amendment Foundation who actually do what they advertise and advocate for gun owners, gun safety, and gun rights without the mountain of corruption and antagonizing of the victims of gun violence. Let the NRA fold and give those organizations more prominence.

    • @STylerStafford
      @STylerStafford 3 ปีที่แล้ว +16

      Don’t forget the Socialist Rifle Association

    • @timothyhayes9724
      @timothyhayes9724 3 ปีที่แล้ว +14

      @Ross May and what might a poor Midwestern gun owner like myself do against them? Let the whole rotten apple barrel be chucked onto the garbage heap it deserves

    • @zachjollimore4339
      @zachjollimore4339 3 ปีที่แล้ว +8

      Oh and the SRA too
      Don't forget about the real political left. We love guns too

    • @MalrexMontresor
      @MalrexMontresor 3 ปีที่แล้ว +20

      @@zachjollimore4339 and don't forget the John Brown Gun Club. I used to be a member of the NRA, because I supported their gun safety programs, but once they started spending funds on NRA-TV programs that were almost exclusively political attack ads that had nothing to do with guns, I gave up my life-time membership. The NRA is pretty much a Trump campaign financing, Russian money laundering vehicle now.

    • @Croz89
      @Croz89 3 ปีที่แล้ว +6

      I think the concern there for pro-gun supporters might be if anti-gun supporters would use the power vacuum between the transition from the NRA to another organisation to lobby for strong gun control laws that would be hard to undo once enacted. It's probably not possible to simply transfer the political and lobbying power of the NRA to another organisation overnight, it may take months or years to regain that clout, a window of opportunity for anti-gun supporters to strike while their opponents are politically severely weakened.

  • @RabblesTheBinx
    @RabblesTheBinx 3 ปีที่แล้ว +76

    2:29 🤣😂🤣😂🤣😂🤣😂🤣😂🤣😂🤣😂🤣 Rudy Giuliani calling _anyone_ a "poor excuse for a lawyer" has to be the funniest thing I've heard all month.

    • @RamdomView
      @RamdomView 3 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      He used to be a good lawyer in the 1980s when he was prosecuting the Mafia. I can only guess that he's going senile.

    • @KingBobXVI
      @KingBobXVI 3 ปีที่แล้ว

      @@RamdomView - Was he really though? Or was he hiring good people on behalf of the Russian mafia to get rid of the Italian mafia? Because that's what he actually did.

  • @HistorysRaven
    @HistorysRaven 2 ปีที่แล้ว +2

    I'm so glad you talk about the 1977 Cincinnati Revolt. I try to discuss this with people and they either ignore it or look at me like I'm crazy.

  • @cameronhumphreys2309
    @cameronhumphreys2309 3 ปีที่แล้ว +4

    As an Australian I’ve never really understood the gun culture in America, after the massacre in Port Arthur I’ve really never liked the idea of guns in general. I’ve grown less extreme in my views over the years, guns have a place in society, mainly for policing, military and as a recreational activity or sport. I still don’t understand the “need” for guns as a form of self defence, seems to me that if you feel the need to defend yourself with lethal force then your government has failed in its promise of a safe society with laws you are beholden to.

    • @schrodingerscat3741
      @schrodingerscat3741 3 ปีที่แล้ว

      The need for guns (as a right) is primarily to keep the government under control, as in to give the populace the chance to fight back if needed.

    • @cameronhumphreys2309
      @cameronhumphreys2309 3 ปีที่แล้ว

      @@schrodingerscat3741 By that notion what happened on the 6th was just an exercise of constitutional rights, in every other democracy the way the civilian checks and balances their government is through voting, that’s the deal; they get the power to cause change, we get to choose who gets that power. If the threat is I’m going to shoot you and not I’m not going to vote for you that’s how you get dictators like Mussolini and Hitler that use Martial law to remind the lay person, ‘the government has the bigger gun’.
      Edit: should reiterate that being threatened was not the only reason why Hitler and Mussolini used martial law, there is something to be said that both political environments were openly hostile at the time of their ascension but the use of martial law was a result of other political and personal beliefs.

    • @schrodingerscat3741
      @schrodingerscat3741 3 ปีที่แล้ว

      @@cameronhumphreys2309 Making it possible for the population to rise up if the democracy fails is the reason for the amendment. It is not legal or a constitutional right in and of itself, lol.
      If they had been right (they weren't), and the election had been stolen, than January 6th would have been justified (It wasn't). It still would have been horribly illegal.
      Armed rebellion is for when the government takes the power that belongs to the people for itself, and starts taking away their rights. It is a final stop gap measure when all other avenues have failed.

  • @himothaniel
    @himothaniel 3 ปีที่แล้ว +46

    You know you're in hot water when LegalEagle spends 15 minutes just listing the things you did wrong

  • @amp7980
    @amp7980 3 ปีที่แล้ว +227

    Would i support the dissolution of a charity if its guilty of fraud regardless of political leaning? Yes. Because any cause worth taking up will be taken up. And anyone doing it badly is only hurting that cause

    • @leavemealone6261
      @leavemealone6261 3 ปีที่แล้ว +9

      That’s an excellent point of view. Never thought about it that way, but I agree.

    • @Frommerman
      @Frommerman 3 ปีที่แล้ว +12

      He asked whether I would be ok with dissolving the ACLU or Planned Parenthood if they were convicted of similar charges. I reply yes. Absolutely I would. I just have significant confidence that this will never happen because, to the best of my ability to tell, they are run by decent human beings rather than soulless lizard people.

    • @harantzori7976
      @harantzori7976 3 ปีที่แล้ว +13

      @@Frommerman All you need is one power hungry individual to reach high enough to start corrupting an organization, I think it's better to be wary than to say "It'll never happen"

    • @SwtBeat
      @SwtBeat 3 ปีที่แล้ว +15

      @@harantzori7976 Which is why it is SO important to have laws and oversight over charities/non-profits! People will give money to things they are emotionally invested in, without oversight...corruption WILL take over eventually.

    • @keld101
      @keld101 3 ปีที่แล้ว +2

      Wouldn't it be better to just force the leadership to step down and give the company a fresh start? It doesn't appear as though the company itself has passed illegal policies. Leadership have just been ignoring the law.

  • @militustoica
    @militustoica 3 ปีที่แล้ว +3

    This whole debacle is what caused me to leave the NRA. It’s disgusting. And I was primed from the start to believe them, but I can’t say I was surprised someone like LaPierre could’ve done this.

  • @ingridiiris9455
    @ingridiiris9455 3 ปีที่แล้ว +17

    Hey, remember all those times Republicans hamstrung unions because they advocated for their charges properly in a farcical and heavy-handed series of technically legal acts that were politically motivated? I do. Turnabout is fair play, NRA. Thoughts and prayers.

    • @sasquatchhunter86
      @sasquatchhunter86 3 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      Must gun owners don’t like the NRA. Nice try though.

    • @ameyaagarwal1170
      @ameyaagarwal1170 2 ปีที่แล้ว

      Most gun owners call the NRA Negotiating Rights Away. I think that shows that most pro gun people don’t like it.

    • @_Jake.From.Statefarm_
      @_Jake.From.Statefarm_ 2 ปีที่แล้ว

      @@sasquatchhunter86 Not that I have an opinion on the matter, but how do you even quantify that.. That just seems like a massive blanket statement based in bias. If you have any evidence of that, I would be interested in seeing it. Not as to discredit you, I just find it interesting if that is the actual case because it seems very unlikely.

    • @sasquatchhunter86
      @sasquatchhunter86 2 ปีที่แล้ว

      @@_Jake.From.Statefarm_ it’s definitely generational though. Boomers and Gen Xers are going to be the more NRA hunting guns type crowd where the millennials are more geared towards modern gear.

    • @_Jake.From.Statefarm_
      @_Jake.From.Statefarm_ 2 ปีที่แล้ว

      @@sasquatchhunter86 I see your point. More so, I think that most people, at least in today's world put their party over anything and everything. It's almost impossible to miss now. The amount of things that people just regurgitate because their flavor news told them it was true. This goes both ways, and no one will ever take responsibility. It's easier to blame someone else. So why I thought It was far fetched was simply because it's THE thing to do as a modern conservative.. They will support the NRA simply because FOX tells them that they are coming for their guns, and will use the NRA as a mouthpiece for conservatives. I'd like to think it hasn't gotten that bad, but generally speaking, it has. Mind you I'm bringing up conservatives because of the topic, not for head hunting.

  • @IAmNumber4000
    @IAmNumber4000 3 ปีที่แล้ว +325

    Oh dear lord the sheer irony of Olly North being kicked out of the NRA for reporting a misallocation of funds.

    • @GrumpyOldFart2
      @GrumpyOldFart2 3 ปีที่แล้ว +13

      You know only us old farts know WHY that is a heap of irony. I mean, since when did Ollie balk at “misappropriation of funds”, considering he was at the center of somesuch that makes this whole NRA thing look like a tempest in a teapot.

    • @jimbotcb3985
      @jimbotcb3985 3 ปีที่แล้ว +4

      I can't believe you kids don't know about the great patriot Ollie North! th-cam.com/video/lFV1uT-ihDo/w-d-xo.html

    • @MrJohnnyAOA
      @MrJohnnyAOA 3 ปีที่แล้ว +4

      @@jimbotcb3985 I only learned about Ollie from American Dad. They made an episode about supposed hidden treasure of Oliver North from Iraq Contra.

    • @Bot-gy9gx
      @Bot-gy9gx 3 ปีที่แล้ว

      Me and the Bois going to sell to the Iranians

  • @BariSaxGod25
    @BariSaxGod25 3 ปีที่แล้ว +220

    “Stops crime before it happens”
    Someone’s clearly never seen Minority Report.

    • @henrycolestage4249
      @henrycolestage4249 3 ปีที่แล้ว +14

      Not the same. Locking your front door and your car does the same thing but it isn't 'Pre-crime'.

    • @johnsater7334
      @johnsater7334 3 ปีที่แล้ว +2

      it is what it is.

    • @sabin97
      @sabin97 3 ปีที่แล้ว

      that's pretty much the excuse william lane craig gives for supporting genocide and the murder of children.

    • @Treblaine
      @Treblaine 3 ปีที่แล้ว +22

      No YOU haven't seen the film. Minority Report didn't simply STOP crime before it happened... it PUNISHED people for crimes they haven't committed yet.

    • @stephlrideout
      @stephlrideout 3 ปีที่แล้ว

      @@Treblaine lol punishing someone before they've committed a crime also prevents the crime from happening, technically, moral quandary aside

  • @Aaronmizuno
    @Aaronmizuno 3 ปีที่แล้ว

    That was one of the smooooothest segues into a sponsor I've seen in ages.

  • @greghill118
    @greghill118 3 ปีที่แล้ว +46

    Well a right-wing charity that got caught with their hand in the cookie jar what a surprise

    • @aoikemono6414
      @aoikemono6414 3 ปีที่แล้ว

      Free market capitalism. Anything goes.

    • @jfbeam
      @jfbeam 3 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      It's more aptly, they never bothered putting the cookies in the cookie jar.

    • @greghill118
      @greghill118 3 ปีที่แล้ว

      Another person brainwashed by the committee

    • @acoow
      @acoow 3 ปีที่แล้ว

      @@greghill118 You're the brainwashed on if you thing the NRA is the friend of conservative and gun owners.

  • @CrescentGuard
    @CrescentGuard 3 ปีที่แล้ว +71

    As someone who loves himself some speed-shooting competitions, gooooood riddance to the NRA

    • @docmorrell
      @docmorrell 3 ปีที่แล้ว

      100% agree sir

    • @mikewaterfield3599
      @mikewaterfield3599 3 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      who would you suggest someone who is worried about erosion of second amendment turn to. in my home state the state cops act like your a criminal when you present your paperwork for a pistol licence. any blue who claims they respect the second amendment is lying.

    • @SuckerFreeGear
      @SuckerFreeGear 3 ปีที่แล้ว +2

      @@mikewaterfield3599 GOA or JFPO or whatever pro 2nd amendment org is in your state. NRA is not for your 2nd amendment and if you think they are you better go watch the video on their own channel with Chris Cox stating red flag laws are a good thing and also their support of banning bump stocks. Wake up!

    • @mikewaterfield3599
      @mikewaterfield3599 3 ปีที่แล้ว

      @@SuckerFreeGear ive been aware for sometime that theve broken from the original mission. personally if they need to be shut down id rather it be gun enthusiasts who do it. improvement always works best from the inside.

  • @HellecticMojo
    @HellecticMojo 3 ปีที่แล้ว +85

    Considering that they are a gun producer support group, instead of the user support group, I'm happy to see lobbyist disappear from politics.

    • @AuraLT
      @AuraLT 3 ปีที่แล้ว +3

      us gun rights supports are happy too

    • @quinnheller1113
      @quinnheller1113 3 ปีที่แล้ว +2

      Really though, it’s like if I were to donate to planned parenthood, and that money wasn’t going towards women’s health, and instead some rich, probably white guys vacation, dissolve it. I feel like it’d be a little more complicated though, because they give medical services, not political lobbying, if you get what I mean

    • @jeckjeck3119
      @jeckjeck3119 3 ปีที่แล้ว

      @@quinnheller1113
      If they use lobbying it is not illegal, but if they do what NRA does... it is disgusting and a crime.

    • @jeckjeck3119
      @jeckjeck3119 3 ปีที่แล้ว

      @All Things Lawyer
      But sadly, it is not illegal.

  • @teresakusic8308
    @teresakusic8308 3 ปีที่แล้ว

    Thank you for these videos. I'm trying to watch more of these due to this being based on laws that I don't know about and becoming more educated because it also helps with my understanding of these things. Thank you 😊

  • @forgetfulHaWk
    @forgetfulHaWk 3 ปีที่แล้ว

    Love how smooth some of these guys are getting with their sponsors, your videos and badlandschugs are the only ones I actually enjoy because of how good your production is for them

  • @LightStrikerQc
    @LightStrikerQc 3 ปีที่แล้ว +138

    4:15 : Yes.
    What if (insert famous left politician) was guilty of sexual assault? In jail!
    What if (insert famous right politician) was guilty of sexual assault? In jail!
    Laws and justice over party.

    • @mikewaterfield3599
      @mikewaterfield3599 3 ปีที่แล้ว +7

      dare to dream,

    • @Krescentwolf
      @Krescentwolf 3 ปีที่แล้ว +4

      Talking sense here.

    • @katieronnie5741
      @katieronnie5741 3 ปีที่แล้ว +9

      Oh lord please. Let me live in that world

    • @nctpti2073
      @nctpti2073 3 ปีที่แล้ว +2

      Would it be wrong to reply with 22:26 "Installation requires only one screw?"

    • @FNLNFNLN
      @FNLNFNLN 3 ปีที่แล้ว

      Too bad that only ever happens on on side.

  • @SilverKnight16
    @SilverKnight16 3 ปีที่แล้ว +231

    "See what I did there?" He sounded _so_ satisfied with himself, it's adorable.

    • @Of_Neptune
      @Of_Neptune 3 ปีที่แล้ว +6

      Be careful, he may sue you.

    • @punsmith
      @punsmith 3 ปีที่แล้ว +11

      I love Legal Eagle. I mean, I'm a European and don't get much out of the US law kerfuffle, but he's a guy I would like to go out for a drink with!

    • @ae9074
      @ae9074 3 ปีที่แล้ว +2

      His channel would be better if he wasn’t a progressive Democrat. If he wasn’t biased to the Democrat’s his channel would be better. He can’t separate his politics from his channel. It’s hard to watch because he agrees using the law to destroy people he disagrees with. It’s sad

    • @SilverKnight16
      @SilverKnight16 3 ปีที่แล้ว +24

      @@ae9074 Stop playing fantasy football with your politics and start paying attention to what's going on. The NRA doesn't do anything to protect the rights of 2nd Amendment folks, only gun manufacturers. They give gun owners a bad reputation.

    • @Worm-revolver
      @Worm-revolver 3 ปีที่แล้ว +12

      @@ae9074 "agrees using the law to destroy people he disagrees with." Sounds like what the Republican party does. But in all honesty, I'm neutral in political matters and legal eagle tries to be politically unbiased so he's doing much better than anyone else in that front.

  • @philandrewscomedy
    @philandrewscomedy 3 ปีที่แล้ว +4

    I know I’ve become a responsible adult when I enjoy the ins and outs of these videos (I literally yelled, “What!?” when you said his contract was never seen by the board).

  • @sryth1
    @sryth1 3 ปีที่แล้ว +2

    I gotta say that transition into the deep sentinel ad was masterful

  • @kenna176
    @kenna176 3 ปีที่แล้ว +101

    When Devin started reading the NRA charter, I had to stop for a moment because I, an advocate for gun safety and regulation, could totally get behind that company. It’s interesting to look at an example of how a well-meaning group of people can succumb to radicalization.

    • @aoikemono6414
      @aoikemono6414 3 ปีที่แล้ว +15

      Sounds super easy. Antiquated organizations that hold onto old ideals gets paranoid of changing cultural values and becomes very susceptible to fraudsters. No different than Trump's post-election voter fraud fundraising being used to pay off his old debts. The old and the stupid are so susceptible. I honestly don't even care that LaPierre is swindling his donors. Diverting money from the stated "mission" sounds like a cool ruse. Maybe he's actually a conniving liberal in disguise!

    • @merrymartin3335
      @merrymartin3335 3 ปีที่แล้ว +23

      I’m very far left, but I used to be ok with the nra. Many years ago they were about gun safety and had no problem with background checks, locking up guns to keep children safe, etc... . They were totally taken over by an arms industry anxious to unload military grade weapons and emerging militias and criminal organizations eager to keep the channel of relatively cheap weapons flowing. If they dissolve the nra it’ll just reform under a new name - a win for them, because they’re in debt in NYNY and don’t want to take their debts with them when they relocate to Texas or Florida.

    • @maryanneslater9675
      @maryanneslater9675 3 ปีที่แล้ว +11

      If you want a glimpse at how it happened, do a little internet research on Harlan Carter. He helped turn gun ownership into an anti-government and white supremacist plank.

  • @MxRelli
    @MxRelli 3 ปีที่แล้ว +169

    You know a lawyer is talking when “allegedly” becomes* a comma . . .

    • @FieldMarshalFry
      @FieldMarshalFry 3 ปีที่แล้ว +8

      or Ian Hislop
      he's the most sued man in British legal history for a reason!

  • @hazukichanx408
    @hazukichanx408 3 ปีที่แล้ว +3

    Actual human being commits one minor crime in the US: "Not on my watch! Beat 'em up! Arrest 'em! Throw 'em in jail!"
    A corporation and its CEO commit several major crimes in the US: "Uh... so, like, should we do something, or wait a little longer, see if they clean up their act on their own?"

  • @facestheband
    @facestheband 3 ปีที่แล้ว

    I rarely make comments, but I have to say I LOVE YOUR COMMERCIAL TRANSITIONS! They are simply the best, I would listen to your videos just to hear them, so clever!

  • @TwoPairSA
    @TwoPairSA 3 ปีที่แล้ว +43

    16:02 "...hired Powell's wife as an independent contractor, through a newly formed company called SPECTRE"
    SPECTRE? Seriously? They are naming companies after literal Bond villains.

    • @junkmail4613
      @junkmail4613 3 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      TwoPairSA 6 hours ago (edited) 16:02 "...hired Powell's wife as an independent contractor, through a newly formed company called SPECTRE" SPECTRE? Seriously? They are naming companies after literal Bond villains.
      a LOT BETTER THAN CALLING IT "SPHINCTER!"

    • @Kartissa
      @Kartissa 3 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      "Special Executive for Counter-intelligence, Terrorism, Revenge and Extortion"
      What kind of project was Powell's wife contracted for...?

  • @JosephKerr27
    @JosephKerr27 3 ปีที่แล้ว +687

    "Thoughts and prayers, NRA. Thoughts and prayers."
    Liked immediately :)

    • @BlackEpyon
      @BlackEpyon 3 ปีที่แล้ว +11

      Don't forget to write that letter to Santa, and wish upon a star.

    • @phillipsofthedriver
      @phillipsofthedriver 3 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      I heard "tots and pears". Now I want some fruit and deep fried potato product tossed with paprika.

    • @zkeletonz001
      @zkeletonz001 3 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      Nice to see that LE is no longer pretending to be unbiased.

    • @saulcontrerasOfficial
      @saulcontrerasOfficial 3 ปีที่แล้ว +14

      NEW NAME for the NRA!!!
      NRAFCPDDFDPD2A - National Rifle Association of Far-right Conservative Proganda Dedicated to Defecating in the Face of Democracy and Pretending to Defend the 2nd Amendment inc.

    • @paladro
      @paladro 3 ปีที่แล้ว +2

      @@saulcontrerasOfficial nailed it!

  • @ganon1028
    @ganon1028 3 ปีที่แล้ว +23

    Watching America now is like that one arc of a shonen anime where everything is happening at once and you're not sure who's fighting who and if it even makes sense, but you keep watching anyway

    • @aoikemono6414
      @aoikemono6414 3 ปีที่แล้ว

      No it's not. And if you are gonna speak in shonen anime terms, it's one bad guy killing another bad guy who was already half-dead, so he can absorb his power and laugh maniacally at the protagonist.

    • @Matty80822
      @Matty80822 3 ปีที่แล้ว

      where mitch at in the dark room round table scene

  • @anthonyclayden4010
    @anthonyclayden4010 2 ปีที่แล้ว

    I just love your segues into the sponsor’s message. So tongue-in-cheek!

  • @PickleJello
    @PickleJello 3 ปีที่แล้ว +30

    Oliver North: "I can excuse death squads, but I draw the line at misuse of charitable funds!"
    Everyone else: "You can excuse death squads?"

    • @eddiemurphy5566
      @eddiemurphy5566 3 ปีที่แล้ว

      But... He's okay with the misuse of taxpayer funds?

    • @maxxcreese9911
      @maxxcreese9911 3 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      @@eddiemurphy5566 we are truly in a weird timeline.

    • @inwalters
      @inwalters 3 ปีที่แล้ว

      Ollie is just upset that he didn't get his cut of the loot

    • @lostbutfreesoul
      @lostbutfreesoul 3 ปีที่แล้ว +2

      @@inwalters ,
      From the reading of the briefings, it sounds like Ollie was being pushed into a 'figurehead' position and didn't like it.

    • @erggml1887
      @erggml1887 3 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      Don't forget drug trafficking and illicit arms dealing, he had his part in that whole thing.

  • @BJAlexThe4th
    @BJAlexThe4th 3 ปีที่แล้ว +20

    3:59 (Paraphrasing) "If you are politically left would you support dissolution of an organization such as the ALCU or Planned Parenthood if they were convicted of misuse of funds or similar?" - YES, because it would have ultimately failed to provide the service for which it was taking donations, ultimately mislead both donors and those seeking help from the organization, and therefore should be held accountable for misconduct. Why is that so hard for some people?

    • @pixality7902
      @pixality7902 3 ปีที่แล้ว +3

      Yea seriously. If anything their donors should be MORE pissed that they misappropriated the funds. That's how you know who is genuine and who is trash.

    • @jonasstrzyz2469
      @jonasstrzyz2469 3 ปีที่แล้ว

      political tribalism and a dissolution of principles that can be found on both the right and the left.

  • @mauriziopane7714
    @mauriziopane7714 3 ปีที่แล้ว

    I LOVE your channel.. all your videos are informative and easy to follow. Thank you!!

  • @Jantonio2912
    @Jantonio2912 3 ปีที่แล้ว

    Let’s just post here and say. Myself and some law students here!
    We love your channel. We learn and refresh our mind so much thanks to you. God bless.

  • @avocadoexists6226
    @avocadoexists6226 3 ปีที่แล้ว +280

    Honestly, watching America from the sidelines, I may have to break out the Jumbo Popcorn

  • @Sophia-vk5bq
    @Sophia-vk5bq 3 ปีที่แล้ว +332

    "The NRA is being shutdown to hurt Conservatives in the presidential election."
    How exactly does Fox news come to that conclusion? lol Oh brother.

    • @matok2426
      @matok2426 3 ปีที่แล้ว +68

      Same way they come to any of their conclusions, they make it up.

    • @Sophia-vk5bq
      @Sophia-vk5bq 3 ปีที่แล้ว +16

      @@matok2426 wouldn't surprise me.

    • @jamesricker3997
      @jamesricker3997 3 ปีที่แล้ว +11

      Because there are unproven accusations that the NRA was acting as a laundromat for illegal foreign campaign contributions for decades. The state of New York is going to get access to the NRA's financial records. If those accusations are true they will be able to to prove them.

    • @Sophia-vk5bq
      @Sophia-vk5bq 3 ปีที่แล้ว +36

      @@jamesricker3997 They're not just accusations. The attourney general of New York did an investigation that found the group lost $64 million over 3 years due to "mismanagement."

    • @greenpinapple820
      @greenpinapple820 3 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      @Harvey Dustin damn, Harvey droppin' black pills over here.

  • @ignitionfrn2223
    @ignitionfrn2223 2 ปีที่แล้ว +3

    4:20 - Chapter 1 - Federal law
    5:40 - Chapter 2 - New York state law
    9:05 - Chapter 3 - New York non profit laws
    10:10 - Chapter 4 - The lawsuit
    20:25 - End roll ads

  • @craffte
    @craffte 3 ปีที่แล้ว

    This is very helpful for putting things together. Thanks, y'all.

  • @bkayser05
    @bkayser05 3 ปีที่แล้ว +42

    I was wondering, could you do a video on how much power the executive branch, Postmaster General, and Postal Board of Governors have to attempt to dissolve USPS. Also the lawsuits being filed by states against Postmaster DeJoy and the Trump administration's alleged attempts to impede vote by mail or sabotage the mail system.
    As a postal employee, I'm curious to see how an actual attorney views these cases and issues.

  • @JamesSamson487
    @JamesSamson487 3 ปีที่แล้ว +239

    “The 2nd amendment doesn’t save you from the liability of using it.”
    Dude, you totally buried the lead!!

    • @Daytruin
      @Daytruin 3 ปีที่แล้ว +25

      who actually thinks 2nd amendment allows you to get away with murder? (other than crazy people.)

    • @JamesSamson487
      @JamesSamson487 3 ปีที่แล้ว +16

      @@Daytruin I was more thinking of gun-nuts who "need to protect their families" but murderers work too...

    • @filthycasual8187
      @filthycasual8187 3 ปีที่แล้ว +28

      @@JamesSamson487 So the desire to protect your family using the most efficient means possible now qualifies you as a "nut," huh? If this line of thinking is the gold standard going forward then America is dead.

    • @sevenguardians7517
      @sevenguardians7517 3 ปีที่แล้ว +8

      James Samson the sad reality is the government doesn’t give a shit about the people it doesn’t matter who’s in power republican or democrat
      The government only does enough to ensure enough people are complacent to it so that it can continue its own interests
      If the government needs to step on you it will and find a reason to justify it and vilify anyone who says otherwise

    • @JamesSamson487
      @JamesSamson487 3 ปีที่แล้ว +11

      SMB Comix
      1) If houses are getting attacked to the point you can determine the efficiency of you defence, you’ve got bigger problems.
      2) So many people cling to the 2nd as a way to have guns, yet apparently it doesn’t help? Why isn’t there a video about that?!

  • @harosokman
    @harosokman 3 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    @LegalEagle, after coming over from LawfulMasses, I have watched about 6 videos in a row. Fantastic content! In comparison to his channel, I love the step up to very serious political subjects which often many wouldn't dare touch.

  • @laurenragle5228
    @laurenragle5228 3 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    Your ad plugs are so smooth. But yes, "because DC" is accurate for missing packages. I left an umbrella out to dry on my doorstep and someone stole it. A cheap, rusted, $12 umbrella. Because DC.

  • @DevilGeneImbued
    @DevilGeneImbued 3 ปีที่แล้ว +90

    When he said “African hunting trips” I took it the completely wrong way and somehow still believed the NRA did what I mistook that as

    • @SnugglehBunny
      @SnugglehBunny 3 ปีที่แล้ว

      weak

    • @ErebosGR
      @ErebosGR 3 ปีที่แล้ว +7

      I bet that the kind of trophy hunting they did wasn't very legal either.

    • @elijahdage5523
      @elijahdage5523 3 ปีที่แล้ว

      @gamer time What kind of political climate is it?

    • @Frommerman
      @Frommerman 3 ปีที่แล้ว +10

      @@ErebosGR It probably was. A lot of African wildlife preserves allow rich people to pay exorbitant sums to "hunt" old, sick, or needlessly violent animals. If you have a bull elephant who keeps killing other elephants during mating season, it's actually better for elephants and the people protecting them if that elephant gets shot in return for a large pile of cash going directly into the preserve's general fund.

    • @MarkAlcarezBoston
      @MarkAlcarezBoston 3 ปีที่แล้ว

      Frommerman did you watch Adam ruins everything?

  • @nosoysin692
    @nosoysin692 3 ปีที่แล้ว +252

    can you please do a reaction to John Oliver's "Juries" video also HBO's "The Night Of", thanks.

    • @jaojao1768
      @jaojao1768 3 ปีที่แล้ว +8

      Good ideas

    • @triple7marc
      @triple7marc 3 ปีที่แล้ว +6

      John Oliver is painfully unfunny.

    • @braydenborrell
      @braydenborrell 3 ปีที่แล้ว +28

      @@triple7marc Productive comment

    • @Docoloco123
      @Docoloco123 3 ปีที่แล้ว +25

      @@triple7marc Different strokes for different folks!

    • @ChaosMongrel
      @ChaosMongrel 3 ปีที่แล้ว +4

      Would totally watch that!

  • @joesebbag8819
    @joesebbag8819 3 ปีที่แล้ว +13

    React to "Just Mercy" its a great movie about a true story in the 90s concerning a black man being charged with murder and being put on death row

    • @Otherwise88
      @Otherwise88 3 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      Yes yes a thousand times yes.

  • @jamesgulliver2752
    @jamesgulliver2752 2 ปีที่แล้ว +2

    Would love to see a follow up to this video!

  • @cweaver4080
    @cweaver4080 3 ปีที่แล้ว +33

    You know its 2020 when Rudy Giuliani calls the NY AG a "poor excuse for a lawyer anyway".

    • @jasonbrown3925
      @jasonbrown3925 3 ปีที่แล้ว +7

      I'm still waiting for Rudy to make a coherent, logical legal argument.

    • @RamdomView
      @RamdomView 3 ปีที่แล้ว

      He used to make good decisions in the 1980s -1990s when he was prosecuting the Mafia.

  • @michaelheliotis5279
    @michaelheliotis5279 3 ปีที่แล้ว +126

    LegalEagle: *promotes a security system to prevent theft*
    Me, in NZ: *leaves the door unlocked when going to the shop*

    • @PerthScienceClinic
      @PerthScienceClinic 3 ปีที่แล้ว +14

      I'm in Perth, Western Australia, and I sometimes do that too.

    • @LochNessax3
      @LochNessax3 3 ปีที่แล้ว +12

      That’s amazing... I lock both locks on my apartment even when I pick up the mail.

    • @georgebizos944
      @georgebizos944 3 ปีที่แล้ว +18

      You leave the house?

    • @zorakj
      @zorakj 3 ปีที่แล้ว +10

      I want to move to NZ or Canada.

    • @Nico-od4yv
      @Nico-od4yv 3 ปีที่แล้ว +15

      I think that Depends more on where you live in a country than on the country. In a smalltalk town where everyone knows each Other Things are usualy safer than in big citys:) e.g. I am from germany and I do this sometimes in my hometown but I Would never do that in Berlin or Köln

  • @everentropy
    @everentropy 3 ปีที่แล้ว +4

    I would love an update on their planned bankruptcy and whether this is actually a normal move for them to make, and the other implications of their imminent move

  • @EcoCentrist
    @EcoCentrist 3 ปีที่แล้ว

    Ok I'm starting to love this channel, funny and informative!

  • @brwnkd
    @brwnkd 3 ปีที่แล้ว +139

    This video deserves a billion likes just for the “thoughts and prayers” opening...

  • @MLIOGJXNUYAT
    @MLIOGJXNUYAT 3 ปีที่แล้ว +212

    Giuliani: "She's a poor excuse for a lawyer." Wahahahahaha! Takes one to know one, I guess.

    • @ikb9386
      @ikb9386 3 ปีที่แล้ว +4

      This made me laugh

    • @supergluehotty
      @supergluehotty 3 ปีที่แล้ว +14

      Well Rudy is an expert at bogus lawyering and cousin diddling. Guess I'll hear him out on the lawyering.

  • @SheyD78
    @SheyD78 3 ปีที่แล้ว

    I like the segue to the promotion at the end. Very smooth. Somehow I doubt the kind of people you really want to deter would be put off by someone yelling at them. Then again I've never had that issue so what do I know.

  • @DeactivatedCharcoal
    @DeactivatedCharcoal 3 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    LegalEagle: The definition of butter smooth segue! I had to ask myself wait, is this a commercial?

  • @ddoyle11
    @ddoyle11 3 ปีที่แล้ว +35

    You know you’ve screwed up when the likes of Oliver North accuses you of malfeasance.

  • @warrenlehmkuhleii8472
    @warrenlehmkuhleii8472 3 ปีที่แล้ว +38

    It seems actual pro 2A people like me, and anti 2A people can agree on something...
    The NRA needs to go.

    • @electrified0
      @electrified0 3 ปีที่แล้ว +4

      What about people who are pro 2A but interpret "a well regulated millitia" differently from "anyone can buy any gun they want"?

    • @warrenlehmkuhleii8472
      @warrenlehmkuhleii8472 3 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      electrified0 Well I take “a well regulated militia” to mean the militia regulates itself, why would we have an organization that is there to potentially overthrow the government, be regulated by the government. Also, the people are the militia, hence “the right of the people to keep and bear arms shall not be infringed.”

    • @kennetic9196
      @kennetic9196 3 ปีที่แล้ว +3

      @@electrified0 then you don't understand well regulated militia and aren't actually pro-2A

    • @Clay3613
      @Clay3613 3 ปีที่แล้ว +4

      Very few actual Americans are against the 2A, I'm rather for reinterpretation and assessment of the amendment. Within the past 50 years the culture of gun ownership in the US has become so toxic and dangerous.

    • @warrenlehmkuhleii8472
      @warrenlehmkuhleii8472 3 ปีที่แล้ว

      Clay3613 If anything it is the opposite, in terms of what is available to the general public we are sort of a declawed kitten. Ok maybe not that far, but we used to be able to buy literal Machine Guns via a Sears catalog.
      Also how are we dangerous, have you been to a gun range or store, we don’t point our guns willy nilly.

  • @andrewthemaroon8608
    @andrewthemaroon8608 3 ปีที่แล้ว

    Man you have the most smooth segue into your sponsorships.

  • @Wayne-fe1ed
    @Wayne-fe1ed 3 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    That was a fantastic segway to the sponsor. So smooth.

  • @nerdlingeeksly5192
    @nerdlingeeksly5192 3 ปีที่แล้ว +30

    "Stops crime before it happens"
    What dystopian movie have I heard this from before?🤔

    • @EliStettner
      @EliStettner 3 ปีที่แล้ว +4

      1984????

    • @nerdlingeeksly5192
      @nerdlingeeksly5192 3 ปีที่แล้ว +9

      @@EliStettner I was thinking Minority Report

    • @Quintinohthree
      @Quintinohthree 3 ปีที่แล้ว +2

      @@nerdlingeeksly5192 It's the plot device of one and an element of the other.

    • @erikburzinski8248
      @erikburzinski8248 3 ปีที่แล้ว

      @@EliStettner i need to watch that movie

    • @A_Single_Clap
      @A_Single_Clap 3 ปีที่แล้ว +3

      The plot of Captain America The winter soldier

  • @seahawkdragon9355
    @seahawkdragon9355 3 ปีที่แล้ว +9

    I grew up in Idaho in the 1950s and 1960s. In a hunting family. Back then the emphasis of the NRA was on training, & the safety and care of (mostly) long guns. Big on safety! I could shoot rifles and shotguns, and my big brothers taught me how to shoot a pellet gun (pistol). Assault weapons were NEVER a consideration! A gazillion years later, my youngest son qualified as an Expert when he was in the Army. To this day he does not find it necessary to own a gun.

  • @GaryPhoenixAlien8
    @GaryPhoenixAlien8 3 ปีที่แล้ว +2

    Hey @LegalEagle. i was wondering what your thoughts about the John Oliver piece on Juries and if you were planning to make a video about it.

  • @jakob.k_design
    @jakob.k_design 3 ปีที่แล้ว

    Gotta say that sponsor ad at the end was smooooooooooooooooth

  • @mbgal7758
    @mbgal7758 3 ปีที่แล้ว +30

    If I found out the ACLU had a whole culture of stealing donation money I would support some type of punishment. If the corruption was just too widespread then I would support dissolution.
    Do you remember when the slightest hint of even just an affair would ruin a politician’s career? Those were the days.

    • @Molenir
      @Molenir 3 ปีที่แล้ว +3

      There are quite a few political charitable organizations known for this kind of malfeasance. The Trump Foundation obviously, but we can't forget the Clinton Foundation either. Its not just a left/right thing, its a politician thing. Just the fact that New York is a Blue state, means they tend to scrutinize political enemies, and where possible, ignore their friends. Possibly why it took so long to finally getting around to investigating Epstein, who was so close to the Dems and their causes.

    • @Aaron-lc8nf
      @Aaron-lc8nf 3 ปีที่แล้ว +4

      ​@@Molenir Epstein was jailed in New York. He wasn't being tried by the state of New York though, it was a federal case...
      This kind of equivalence doesn't actually hold up to scrutiny, one example vs another example doesn't make them equal in all instances.

    • @Momo-hh6er
      @Momo-hh6er 3 ปีที่แล้ว +2

      Politicians always had scandals. Before the internet and smartphones many were able to cover their tracks. Now we just accept that all politicians are messed up like the people they represent.

    • @ginawhiteley8834
      @ginawhiteley8834 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      The ACLU is not honest. Amber Heard was their spokesperson for abused women because of bedroom politics. Did she ever donate the money she pledged yet.?

  • @QuestionEverythingButWHY
    @QuestionEverythingButWHY 3 ปีที่แล้ว +64

    “Older men declare war. But it is youth that must fight and die.”
    ― Herbert Hoover

    • @FinRL
      @FinRL 3 ปีที่แล้ว +8

      Why don't the presidents fight the war? Why do they always send the poor?
      Getting system of a down vibes here

    • @QuestionEverythingButWHY
      @QuestionEverythingButWHY 3 ปีที่แล้ว +14

      @@FinRL Also, “When the rich wage war it's the poor who die.” ― Jean-Paul Sartre. It used to be and still is like this.

    • @WanderingWriter
      @WanderingWriter 3 ปีที่แล้ว

      @@QuestionEverythingButWHY Linkin Park used that line in their song Hands Held High

    • @QuestionEverythingButWHY
      @QuestionEverythingButWHY 3 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      @@WanderingWriter Yeah they did. Just listened the song. Thanks for letting me know. Had no idea. Linkin ParK was my fav while growing up.

    • @KamikazethecatII
      @KamikazethecatII 3 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      Fin because it’s not sensible to put your military leaders on the front lines anymore

  • @sasotadic7032
    @sasotadic7032 3 ปีที่แล้ว +4

    "poor excuse for a lawyer"
    Such prophetic words from Guliani

  • @smnkm4ehfer
    @smnkm4ehfer ปีที่แล้ว +4

    Gotta love lawyer that doesn't respect a constitutionally recognized and inalienable right such as the 2nd amendment.

    • @crunch4743
      @crunch4743 ปีที่แล้ว

      one of the worst rights too

  • @justinianthe1st790
    @justinianthe1st790 3 ปีที่แล้ว +47

    The NRA being gone would be the only good thing to come out of this year.

    • @BiteTheHook
      @BiteTheHook 3 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      I know. We need to make way for better organizations like the GOA.

    • @jakesullivan9179
      @jakesullivan9179 3 ปีที่แล้ว

      My issue is that it's the New York attorney general sueing, New York issues before national organizations.

  • @macdaddy1149
    @macdaddy1149 3 ปีที่แล้ว +55

    “Thoughts and Prayers!” That was great! As a believer in the 2nd amendment I do agree with regulations on the 2nd amendment. Remember what these people were saying about “ illegal immigrants” they said “ If you break the law you should pay the price.” That goes for everyone, right? The NRA broke the law so they need to pay the price. Or are you hypocrites too?

    • @atashgallagher1631
      @atashgallagher1631 3 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      there already are limits that no sane person would disagree with, I cannot legally purchase a fighter jet with missiles and a minigun. I cannot own a tank with a functioning cannon, I cannot purchase a 30killowatt laser turret, I cannot purchase an ICBM, I cannot own an effing truck-mounted 50cal machinegun, I can't put a flak turret on my property. those are weapons of war and have no use in self-defense or hunting. and we should all agree we don't want some gun nut getting hundreds of grenades.

    • @andrewmoore7022
      @andrewmoore7022 3 ปีที่แล้ว +3

      @@atashgallagher1631 actually you can on a flak Cannon and I'm also pretty sure you can own a vehicle mounted HMGs you just have to find one that was registered pre-87

  • @surly74
    @surly74 3 ปีที่แล้ว

    This is probably the most underrated channel on YT.