Michael Proctor lol, the corrupt state trooper who intentionally broke her tail light and who lost his job, also was best friend with the homeowner and rest of the people who was in the house..
And I don't understand why they left out the fact that the FBI has an open investigation, and that the FBI hired independent experts - the Best - who said that John O'Keefe was NOT hit by a car.
Haha. Yeah he was a foul mouth but don’t make up fairy stories. You sound like the defence. Too much conspiracy shows have got to peoples brains. It’s not rocket science. 12:32am time of the reversal and John never moving again, Karen hammers to John’s house and put her car in the garage. Freaked Kaylee out 4;30am saying something really bad has happened. 5am she said johns dead to Kerry Roberts. 5;07 she’s on camera. Zoom pause as she’s leaving. Slow it all down. Zoom in. Her tail light has a hole in it that you could fit a football in. So you can’t forget the breaking of tailight. By cops or anyone other than Karen at reverse time. It’s not hard is it? Or did cops chase her at 12:32 after the reverse with a hammer and sack to put the pieces in and leave John for another 5 hours😂. Seriously. You can’t just go ridiculous for no reason and make things up. There’s no such things as time machines. It’s not hard.
@@JuiceLife *Did the FKR’ers not get the memo and not aware of the recent public confirmations: 1. (08.22.24) By the FKR main blogger - nothing will ever happen to the Alberts, etc, including no charges being laid. Why would he say this if he’s so sure of the “alleged” third-party culprit, frame job and conspiracy and it was he that started the whole thing off (with KR’s help according to court documents in his case) - go figure. 2. (08.23.24) By Ted Daniel (Boston 25) - the FBI investigation was wrapped up a while ago after the FBI found no crimes were committed (no evidence of KR’s allegations as to a “third-party culprit”, “frame job” and “conspiracy” as per the 3,074 page report (said to be April 24) given to KR and her defense team). 3. (09.03.24) By an ex-FBI agent - there is a weaponisation of social media, evidence has been bastardised to what the true reality is, there are hundreds of communications between KR and the blogger (facing eighteen felony charges), to believe this “pretend notion” that KR has done nothing wrong and the conspiracy they entered into to carry out the allegations of KR, to turn away from the facts and circumstances that KR talked about in her interviews and her lawyer saying from the get go it was just an accident, which will all be ugly and eye opening, and will come out in the civil case against KR (rules are less restrictive) which is a strong case and will be won. *Yet the FKR’ers still continue to repeat themselves with allegations that are unproven, probably won’t even be relied upon at the retrial, and ultimately go nowhere 🥱!
@@JuiceLife 1. The external company (ARCCA - litigation consultants HIRED AND NOT EMPLOYED BY THE FBI) did not conclusively say; that JO was not hit by a vehicle/car/SUV, nor that KR’s SUV did not hit JO, nor that it was impossible, and nor that 100% it did not happen (nor for that matter that it looked like JO was beaten and bitten and scratched by a dog). 2. They said quote: “We concede there simply is not enough evidence to DETERMINE that Mr. O’Keefe was hit by an automobile”. Thus, not enough evidence that THEY had for them to say that JO was hit by KR’s SUV. 3. If they had arrived at the conclusion that JO definitively was not hit by KR’s SUV, that would be exculpatory evidence and the charges against KR would have been dropped by now, and potentially with further indictments/charges being issued/laid against another person/s. 4. The experts admitted: (a). They had only been given a selected quantity of file material and had no say in what was given to them. (b). They had not seen any actual evidence, including KR’s SUV, which has a rear spoiler (sticking out above the rear window/hatch) and only saw photographs, and had not been provided with other related information/material/evidence. (c). Whilst one of the experts (Wolfe) specialises in lighting, optics, visibility and Lexus/Toyota (KR’s SUV) tech stream vehicle data (which verified an accident with KR’s SUV at this time), he did not review the SUV data, nor do any testing or analysis in his areas of expertise. (d). They were told they could only consider what they had been provided with and must not do any outside research, nor seek any further material, etc, from anywhere/anyone. (e). There were no reports or videos of any testing from what I recall. 5. A report/opinion/theory cannot be based on partial information and testing, etc, and is not sufficient to give a 100% accurate account that can be relied upon and cannot be regarded as undisputed scientific facts and just an opinion based on partial information, therefore deemed bogus and junk science. 6. All things MUST be sighted and considered to reach a proper and accurate conclusion. As per this company’s own website and that all data, etc, must be collected in order to create an accurate reconstruction of an accident.
@@stevenprice6957 so how do you explain the German shepherds scratch marks on his arm and then the home owners mysteriously getting rid of their dog couple months later? Oh and Albert goes to a random cop funeral in NYC but not a cop he was hanging w the night he got killed in front of his house…so much more I can put if you want more lol
Such a unique and tragic story..someone inside that house killed this poor man but it most certainly was not Karen..I really hope whoever is responsible is caught 🤞
@@TheBebe2214he died because he was intoxicated and fell twice once on the lawn near the flagpole then he fell on the fire hydrant and suffered head injuries!
@@Logicalreasons1 then why was her tailight broken and there was pieces on him? Why did she think she might on hit him then she backtracks? Why did she drive drunk after having 9 drinks as the bar said? If u watched the full 2020 interview she said she was mad at him and dropped him off at the cop friend house and waited for him to let her know if he was going to stay or go. She said she played way her phone and radio and still didn’t hear back from him after ten minutes so she left. This was the time when she backed up and hit him. The real question is if she hit him intentionally or not but she did hit him and kill him.
The thing is though: 1. Dr. Kenneth Kinsey (renown expert from the Alex Murdaugh trial and also trained in animal marks) has publicly stated the injuries to JO’s arm were not caused by a dog, and no canine DNA was found. 2. The FBI (and calling on a Federal Grand Jury) investigation found no evidence as to KR’s allegations of an “alleged”; third-party culprit, frame job and conspiracy. 3. You say KR didn’t do it. 4. So WHO DID IT? 5. Oh wait ….. “Frosty the Snowman” - surprised he hasn’t been arrested by now .…. 🚔⛄️!
@@honey_bee_33 why are so hell bent on it not being Karen that did it? What else did she break her back light on after she had 9 drinks and her boyfriend never went in the house?
@@TheBebe2214 because when investigating a murder, you should want the police to look at all the possibilities. If you were accused of murder, wouldn't you want that? Wouldn't you want that as a juror so you can rule out any reasonable doubt. Also, the FBI proved he didn't get hit by a car. You'd need 9 drinks to think he did.
* Timeline | KR calls and texts to JO | Immediately after his phone stops moving 1. 12:32 am - JO's phone stopped showing any movement in the area where the SUV dropped him off. 2. 12:33 am to 12:41 am - KR called JO fifteen (15) times as she was driving back to his house (this is straight after (allegedly) just dropping JO off and nothing serious/wrong happening and her stating she left because she had "stomach issues"). 3. 12:37 am (in between the above time) - KR left a voicemail screaming: "John I f'ing HATE you!" 4. 12:41 am to 12:55 am - There are no calls or texts within these fourteen (14) minutes after she gets to JO's house. 5. 12:55 am - KR text JO: "I'm going home" and "I'll see you later". 6. 12:58 am to 1:00 am - KR called JO five (5) times. 7. 01:00 am - KR text JO: "Your kids are f'ing alone". 8. 01:04 am - KR text JO: "I'm back in Mansfield" (which we know from the trial was untrue). 9. 01:09 am - KR called her parents - no answer. 10. 01:10 am to 01:18 am - KR called JO eleven (11) times (this is around thirty (30) minutes or so since (allegedly) just dropping JO off and nothing serious/wrong happening and her stating she left because she had "stomach issues"). * However, for example: 1. KR called and texted JO thirty-five (35) times in less than an hour, but if she was so worried why didn't she try to call any of his friends? 2. If KR just dropped JO off at the party (as she said because she just had "stomach issues"): (a) Why did she start frantically calling him fifteen (15) times after just dropping him off? (b) Why didn't she call someone at the party when he failed to answer his phone? 3. Why didn't KR call the Police for help searching for JO, at any time. 4. What was KR doing in the fourteen (14) minutes after arriving back at JO's when her phone had no activity - did she go back to Fairview Road and see JO on the ground injured, then go back to his house and start panicking? 5. KR's version of events makes not much sense when you review the calls and texts pattern above?
*Did the FKR’ers not get the memo and not aware of the recent public confirmations: 1. (08.22.24) By the FKR main blogger - nothing will ever happen to the Alberts, etc, including no charges being laid. Why would he say this if he’s so sure of the “alleged” third-party culprit, frame job and conspiracy and it was he that started the whole thing off (with KR’s help according to court documents in his case) - go figure. 2. (08.23.24) By Ted Daniel (Boston 25) - the FBI investigation was wrapped up a while ago after the FBI found no crimes were committed (no evidence of KR’s allegations as to a “third-party culprit”, “frame job” and “conspiracy” as per the 3,074 page report (said to be April 24) given to KR and her defense team). 3. (09.03.24) By an ex-FBI agent - there is a weaponisation of social media, evidence has been bastardised to what the true reality is, there are hundreds of communications between KR and the blogger (facing eighteen felony charges), to believe this “pretend notion” that KR has done nothing wrong and the conspiracy they entered into to carry out the allegations of KR, to turn away from the facts and circumstances that KR talked about in her interviews and her lawyer saying from the get go it was just an accident, which will all be ugly and eye opening, and will come out in the civil case against KR (rules are less restrictive) which is a strong case and will be won. *Yet the FKR’ers still continue to repeat themselves with allegations that are unproven, probably won’t even be relied upon at the retrial, and ultimately go nowhere 🥱!
*Did the FKR’ers not get the memo and not aware of the recent public confirmations: 1. (08.22.24) By the FKR main blogger - nothing will ever happen to the Alberts, etc, including no charges being laid. Why would he say this if he’s so sure of the “alleged” third-party culprit, frame job and conspiracy and it was he that started the whole thing off (with KR’s help according to court documents in his case) - go figure. 2. (08.23.24) By Ted Daniel (Boston 25) - the FBI investigation was wrapped up a while ago after the FBI found no crimes were committed (no evidence of KR’s allegations as to a “third-party culprit”, “frame job” and “conspiracy” as per the 3,074 page report (said to be April 24) given to KR and her defense team). 3. (09.03.24) By an ex-FBI agent - there is a weaponisation of social media, evidence has been bastardised to what the true reality is, there are hundreds of communications between KR and the blogger (facing eighteen felony charges), to believe this “pretend notion” that KR has done nothing wrong and the conspiracy they entered into to carry out the allegations of KR, to turn away from the facts and circumstances that KR talked about in her interviews and her lawyer saying from the get go it was just an accident, which will all be ugly and eye opening, and will come out in the civil case against KR (rules are less restrictive) which is a strong case and will be won. *Yet the FKR’ers still continue to repeat themselves with allegations that are unproven, probably won’t even be relied upon at the retrial, and ultimately go nowhere 🥱!
@@bobbylupo1571 I'm not so sure. Showing emotion at the autopsy photos would at least get some people to believe she loved him. She seems so cold in court. As a juror, her smiling, joking as if this weren't a big deal, and lack of emotion where others showed it would absolutely concern me.
@@VintageRed411 she lost her job, car, reputation and bf I’m sure she cried every tear out over the past couple years she needs to show strength and wants to get her life back your making it seem like that’s the first time she saw those photos. And when everyone is corrupt around you including the judge n detectives it’s almost comical like this can’t be happening
John O Keefe Potentially Wearing NIke Shoes 👟 SLIPS On Ice 🧊 & Snow ❄️ Into A Backing SUV Vehicle 🚗 &/or SUV 🚙 Wheels SLIDE Unintentionally : Purely Accidental
* Timeline | "Alleged" third-party culprit, frame job and conspiracy theory 1. Feb 2, 22 - arraignment charges of manslaughter, motor vehicle homicide and leaving the scene of a motor vehicle collision causing death - bail $50k. 2. June 10, 22 - arraignment charges upgraded to second degree manslaughter while operating under the influence of alcohol and leaving the scene of personal injury and death - bail $100k. 3. Sept 22, 22 - AJ joined the defense team. 4. April 17, 23 - KR took deliberate action and provided the blogger with confidential information in more than forty (40) hours of conversations during one hundred and eighty-nine (189) phone calls and via other methods of communication (reports online as to the evidence in the bloggers case and court documents). 5. Further, it's also been: (a). Stated; there are hundreds (100’s) of communications between KR and the blogger, to believe the “pretend notion” of which are ugly and eye opening and will come out in the civil case (ex-FBI agent - 09.03.24) (b). Alleged; KR kept LE waiting for two hours whilst she deleted things from her phone, there is a receipt from KR’s brother’s Lexus/Toyota dealership for the bloggers Lexus vehicle, and Venmo payments made to the blogger, of which LE obtained. (c). Alleged; the defense team also met and had hours of phone calls with the blogger. 6. April 23 - The blogger started spreading the “alleged” third-party culprit, frame job and conspiracy theory. 7. May 3, 23 - The defense team started raising the “alleged” third-party culprit, frame job and conspiracy theory, etc, in court, for the first time (as I understand it) since JO’s passing on 01.29.22. 8. Aug 23 - TODAY KR interview. Raising the “alleged” third-party culprit, frame job and conspiracy theory. 9. Oct 23 - ABC News Nightline KR interview. Raising the “alleged” third-party culprit, frame job and conspiracy theory. * The timing of what is said, is just as important as what is said and why. In these circumstances the "alleged" third-party culprit, frame job and conspiracy theory, was not said from JO’s passing on 01.29.22 (nor via KR’s arraignments in Feb and June 22) until such time as 05.03.23 (when the allegations were first raised in court).
@KnucklSandwich Is that you Karen or her gf/bf (ewww). We get you are upset because the only thing more destroyed than KR’s taillight is her dodgy defense. Try not to let that, and others words and facts, worry you so much. It’s the public that needs to worry if KR does jail time, then gets out, and becomes an Uber driver - talk about depopulation! We know you stand behind her - just not when she’s reversing right! Stay safe out there! ⚖️🙏🏻 for Officer John O’Keefe.
@KnucklSandwich * Did the FKR’ers not get the memo and not aware of the recent public confirmations: 1. (08.22.24) By the FKR main blogger - nothing will ever happen to the Alberts, etc, including no charges being laid. Why would he say this if he’s so sure of the “alleged” third-party culprit, frame job and conspiracy and it was he that started the whole thing off (with KR’s help according to court documents in his case) - go figure. 2. (08.23.24) By Ted Daniel (Boston 25) - the FBI investigation was wrapped up a while ago after the FBI found no crimes were committed (no evidence of KR’s allegations as to a “third-party culprit”, “frame job” and “conspiracy” as per the 3,074 page report (said to be April 24) given to KR and her defense team). 3. (09.03.24) By an ex-FBI agent - there is a weaponisation of social media, evidence has been bastardised to what the true reality is, there are hundreds of communications between KR and the blogger (facing eighteen felony charges), to believe this “pretend notion” that KR has done nothing wrong and the conspiracy they entered into to carry out the allegations of KR, to turn away from the facts and circumstances that KR talked about in her interviews and her lawyer saying from the get go it was just an accident, which will all be ugly and eye opening, and will come out in the civil case against KR (rules are less restrictive) which is a strong case and will be won. *Yet the FKR’ers still continue to repeat themselves with allegations that are unproven, probably won’t even be relied upon at the retrial, and ultimately go nowhere 🥱!
After watching the full 2020 interview it’s clear she was very drunk and hit him with her vehicle. Whether she did it on purpose or not is the question.
Did you see the independent accident reconstruction experts testimony at first trial? 2 people of which has more education than any expert who works at the MSP. They said no way Karen hit him and BTW they were hired by the FBI and DOJ not the defense. Try looking at evidence and not your emotions of how someone looks.
Try watching the actual *full* *trial* . You may change your mind. But I guess you only have time for mass media junk and the attention span of a 5 year-old.
@@gmpick9793 How about you start looking at things objectively: 1. The external company (ARCCA - litigation consultants HIRED AND NOT EMPLOYED BY THE FBI) did not conclusively say; that JO was not hit by a vehicle/car/SUV, nor that KR’s SUV did not hit JO, nor that it was impossible, and nor that 100% it did not happen (nor for that matter that it looked like JO was beaten and bitten and scratched by a dog). 2. They said quote: “We concede there simply is not enough evidence to DETERMINE that Mr. O’Keefe was hit by an automobile”. Thus, not enough evidence that THEY had for them to say that JO was hit by KR’s SUV. 3. If they had arrived at the conclusion that JO definitively was not hit by KR’s SUV, that would be exculpatory evidence and the charges against KR would have been dropped by now, and potentially with further indictments/charges being issued/laid against another person/s. 4. The experts admitted: (a). They had only been given a selected quantity of file material and had no say in what was given to them. (b). They had not seen any actual evidence, including KR’s SUV, which has a rear spoiler (sticking out above the rear window/hatch) and only saw photographs, and had not been provided with other related information/material/evidence. (c). Whilst one of the experts (Wolfe) specialises in lighting, optics, visibility and Lexus/Toyota (KR’s SUV) tech stream vehicle data (which verified an accident with KR’s SUV at this time), he did not review the SUV data, nor do any testing or analysis in his areas of expertise. (d). They were told they could only consider what they had been provided with and must not do any outside research, nor seek any further material, etc, from anywhere/anyone. (e). There were no reports or videos of any testing from what I recall. 5. A report/opinion/theory cannot be based on partial information and testing, etc, and is not sufficient to give a 100% accurate account that can be relied upon and cannot be regarded as undisputed scientific facts and just an opinion based on partial information, therefore deemed bogus and junk science. 6. All things MUST be sighted and considered to reach a proper and accurate conclusion. As per this company’s own website and that all data, etc, must be collected in order to create an accurate reconstruction of an accident.
@KnucklSandwich 1. The external company (ARCCA - litigation consultants HIRED AND NOT EMPLOYED BY THE FBI) did not conclusively say; that JO was not hit by a vehicle/car/SUV, nor that KR’s SUV did not hit JO, nor that it was impossible, and nor that 100% it did not happen (nor for that matter that it looked like JO was beaten and bitten and scratched by a dog). 2. They said quote: “We concede there simply is not enough evidence to DETERMINE that Mr. O’Keefe was hit by an automobile”. Thus, not enough evidence that THEY had for them to say that JO was hit by KR’s SUV. 3. If they had arrived at the conclusion that JO definitively was not hit by KR’s SUV, that would be exculpatory evidence and the charges against KR would have been dropped by now, and potentially with further indictments/charges being issued/laid against another person/s. 4. The experts admitted: (a). They had only been given a selected quantity of file material and had no say in what was given to them. (b). They had not seen any actual evidence, including KR’s SUV, which has a rear spoiler (sticking out above the rear window/hatch) and only saw photographs, and had not been provided with other related information/material/evidence. (c). Whilst one of the experts (Wolfe) specialises in lighting, optics, visibility and Lexus/Toyota (KR’s SUV) tech stream vehicle data (which verified an accident with KR’s SUV at this time), he did not review the SUV data, nor do any testing or analysis in his areas of expertise. (d). They were told they could only consider what they had been provided with and must not do any outside research, nor seek any further material, etc, from anywhere/anyone. (e). There were no reports or videos of any testing from what I recall. 5. A report/opinion/theory cannot be based on partial information and testing, etc, and is not sufficient to give a 100% accurate account that can be relied upon and cannot be regarded as undisputed scientific facts and just an opinion based on partial information, therefore deemed bogus and junk science. 6. All things MUST be sighted and considered to reach a proper and accurate conclusion. As per this company’s own website and that all data, etc, must be collected in order to create an accurate reconstruction of an accident.
@@miltdta *Did the FKR’ers not get the memo and not aware of the recent public confirmations: 1. (08.22.24) By the FKR main blogger - nothing will ever happen to the Alberts, etc, including no charges being laid. Why would he say this if he’s so sure of the “alleged” third-party culprit, frame job and conspiracy and it was he that started the whole thing off (with KR’s help according to court documents in his case) - go figure. 2. (08.23.24) By Ted Daniel (Boston 25) - the FBI investigation was wrapped up a while ago after the FBI found no crimes were committed (no evidence of KR’s allegations as to a “third-party culprit”, “frame job” and “conspiracy” as per the 3,074 page report (said to be April 24) given to KR and her defense team). 3. (09.03.24) By an ex-FBI agent - there is a weaponisation of social media, evidence has been bastardised to what the true reality is, there are hundreds of communications between KR and the blogger (facing eighteen felony charges), to believe this “pretend notion” that KR has done nothing wrong and the conspiracy they entered into to carry out the allegations of KR, to turn away from the facts and circumstances that KR talked about in her interviews and her lawyer saying from the get go it was just an accident, which will all be ugly and eye opening, and will come out in the civil case against KR (rules are less restrictive) which is a strong case and will be won. *Yet the FKR’ers still continue to repeat themselves with allegations that are unproven, probably won’t even be relied upon at the retrial, and ultimately go nowhere 🥱!
Karen Read is Norman Bates in disguise as his own mother. Twisted Karens nose grows by the day. I saw John. With my X-ray vision. I knew it was him because I lost my marbles at 12:32 and was doing my target practice on great man John. Then i thought I’d leave him freeze for a few hours as I needed a nap. Then woke up and thought, a plow hit him would be good fairy tale. Then I’ll just blame anyone and everyone I can.
@KnucklSandwich *Did the FKR’ers not get the memo and not aware of the recent public confirmations: 1. (08.22.24) By the FKR main blogger - nothing will ever happen to the Alberts, etc, including no charges being laid. Why would he say this if he’s so sure of the “alleged” third-party culprit, frame job and conspiracy and it was he that started the whole thing off (with KR’s help according to court documents in his case) - go figure. 2. (08.23.24) By Ted Daniel (Boston 25) - the FBI investigation was wrapped up a while ago after the FBI found no crimes were committed (no evidence of KR’s allegations as to a “third-party culprit”, “frame job” and “conspiracy” as per the 3,074 page report (said to be April 24) given to KR and her defense team). 3. (09.03.24) By an ex-FBI agent - there is a weaponisation of social media, evidence has been bastardised to what the true reality is, there are hundreds of communications between KR and the blogger (facing eighteen felony charges), to believe this “pretend notion” that KR has done nothing wrong and the conspiracy they entered into to carry out the allegations of KR, to turn away from the facts and circumstances that KR talked about in her interviews and her lawyer saying from the get go it was just an accident, which will all be ugly and eye opening, and will come out in the civil case against KR (rules are less restrictive) which is a strong case and will be won. *Yet the FKR’ers still continue to repeat themselves with allegations that are unproven, probably won’t even be relied upon at the retrial, and ultimately go nowhere 🥱!
@KnucklSandwich Is that you Karen (dirty deed) Read (seeing as you are calling people names) or her gf/bf. We get you are upset because the only thing more destroyed than KR’s taillight is her dodgy defense. Try not to let that, and others words and facts, worry you so much. It’s the public that needs to worry if KR does jail time, then gets out, and becomes an Uber driver - talk about depopulation! We know you stand behind her - just not when she’s reversing right! Stay safe out there! ⚖️🙏🏻 for Officer John O’Keefe.
@KnucklSandwich In what regard? What part of the above do you not understand? Also, can’t take the FK’ers seriously: stating, amongst other things, the FBI were going to come charging in to the trial and arrest everyone and LE didn’t have JO’s missing sneaker, belt and cap - all proven untrue 👋🏻
She is 100% guilty. An accident, yes but she did it.
Michael Proctor lol, the corrupt state trooper who intentionally broke her tail light and who lost his job, also was best friend with the homeowner and rest of the people who was in the house..
And I don't understand why they left out the fact that the FBI has an open investigation, and that the FBI hired independent experts - the Best - who said that John O'Keefe was NOT hit by a car.
Haha. Yeah he was a foul mouth but don’t make up fairy stories. You sound like the defence. Too much conspiracy shows have got to peoples brains. It’s not rocket science. 12:32am time of the reversal and John never moving again, Karen hammers to John’s house and put her car in the garage. Freaked Kaylee out 4;30am saying something really bad has happened. 5am she said johns dead to Kerry Roberts. 5;07 she’s on camera. Zoom pause as she’s leaving. Slow it all down. Zoom in. Her tail light has a hole in it that you could fit a football in. So you can’t forget the breaking of tailight. By cops or anyone other than Karen at reverse time. It’s not hard is it? Or did cops chase her at 12:32 after the reverse with a hammer and sack to put the pieces in and leave John for another 5 hours😂. Seriously.
You can’t just go ridiculous for no reason and make things up. There’s no such things as time machines. It’s not hard.
@@JuiceLife *Did the FKR’ers not get the memo and not aware of the recent public confirmations:
1. (08.22.24) By the FKR main blogger - nothing will ever happen to the Alberts, etc, including no charges being laid. Why would he say this if he’s so sure of the “alleged” third-party culprit, frame job and conspiracy and it was he that started the whole thing off (with KR’s help according to court documents in his case) - go figure.
2. (08.23.24) By Ted Daniel (Boston 25) - the FBI investigation was wrapped up a while ago after the FBI found no crimes were committed (no evidence of KR’s allegations as to a “third-party culprit”, “frame job” and “conspiracy” as per the 3,074 page report (said to be April 24) given to KR and her defense team).
3. (09.03.24) By an ex-FBI agent - there is a weaponisation of social media, evidence has been bastardised to what the true reality is, there are hundreds of communications between KR and the blogger (facing eighteen felony charges), to believe this “pretend notion” that KR has done nothing wrong and the conspiracy they entered into to carry out the allegations of KR, to turn away from the facts and circumstances that KR talked about in her interviews and her lawyer saying from the get go it was just an accident, which will all be ugly and eye opening, and will come out in the civil case against KR (rules are less restrictive) which is a strong case and will be won.
*Yet the FKR’ers still continue to repeat themselves with allegations that are unproven, probably won’t even be relied upon at the retrial, and ultimately go nowhere 🥱!
@@JuiceLife 1. The external company (ARCCA - litigation consultants HIRED AND NOT EMPLOYED BY THE FBI) did not conclusively say; that JO was not hit by a vehicle/car/SUV, nor that KR’s SUV did not hit JO, nor that it was impossible, and nor that 100% it did not happen (nor for that matter that it looked like JO was beaten and bitten and scratched by a dog).
2. They said quote: “We concede there simply is not enough evidence to DETERMINE that Mr. O’Keefe was hit by an automobile”. Thus, not enough evidence that THEY had for them to say that JO was hit by KR’s SUV.
3. If they had arrived at the conclusion that JO definitively was not hit by KR’s SUV, that would be exculpatory evidence and the charges against KR would have been dropped by now, and potentially with further indictments/charges being issued/laid against another person/s.
4. The experts admitted:
(a). They had only been given a selected quantity of file material and had no say in what was given to them.
(b). They had not seen any actual evidence, including KR’s SUV, which has a rear spoiler (sticking out above the rear window/hatch) and only saw photographs, and had not been provided with other related information/material/evidence.
(c). Whilst one of the experts (Wolfe) specialises in lighting, optics, visibility and Lexus/Toyota (KR’s SUV) tech stream vehicle data (which verified an accident with KR’s SUV at this time), he did not review the SUV data, nor do any testing or analysis in his areas of expertise.
(d). They were told they could only consider what they had been provided with and must not do any outside research, nor seek any further material, etc, from anywhere/anyone.
(e). There were no reports or videos of any testing from what I recall.
5. A report/opinion/theory cannot be based on partial information and testing, etc, and is not sufficient to give a 100% accurate account that can be relied upon and cannot be regarded as undisputed scientific facts and just an opinion based on partial information, therefore deemed bogus and junk science.
6. All things MUST be sighted and considered to reach a proper and accurate conclusion. As per this company’s own website and that all data, etc, must be collected in order to create an accurate reconstruction of an accident.
@@stevenprice6957 so how do you explain the German shepherds scratch marks on his arm and then the home owners mysteriously getting rid of their dog couple months later? Oh and Albert goes to a random cop funeral in NYC but not a cop he was hanging w the night he got killed in front of his house…so much more I can put if you want more lol
Such a unique and tragic story..someone inside that house killed this poor man but it most certainly was not Karen..I really hope whoever is responsible is caught 🤞
@@queenbea82x what makes you think that?
@TheBebe2214 facts.
@@KarenRead.is.innocent did you watch the whole 2020 interview those were real facts. Karen did it and trying to get away with it.
@@TheBebe2214he died because he was intoxicated and fell twice once on the lawn near the flagpole then he fell on the fire hydrant and suffered head injuries!
@@Logicalreasons1 then why was her tailight broken and there was pieces on him? Why did she think she might on hit him then she backtracks? Why did she drive drunk after having 9 drinks as the bar said? If u watched the full 2020 interview she said she was mad at him and dropped him off at the cop friend house and waited for him to let her know if he was going to stay or go. She said she played way her phone and radio and still didn’t hear back from him after ten minutes so she left. This was the time when she backed up and hit him. The real question is if she hit him intentionally or not but she did hit him and kill him.
Rip Officer John O’Kefe. Thank you for your service and I hope justice is served.
They made damn sure the truth was hidden and the real justice will never be served cos they lie too much.
How long does it take for one to get hypothermia?
Long enough to be dragged out onto a lawn to die in the cold 🥶 at 2:27. -J MC Cabe
She's innocent please she out
The thing is though:
1. Dr. Kenneth Kinsey (renown expert from the Alex Murdaugh trial and also trained in animal marks) has publicly stated the injuries to JO’s arm were not caused by a dog, and no canine DNA was found.
2. The FBI (and calling on a Federal Grand Jury) investigation found no evidence as to KR’s allegations of an “alleged”; third-party culprit, frame job and conspiracy.
3. You say KR didn’t do it.
4. So WHO DID IT?
5. Oh wait ….. “Frosty the Snowman” - surprised he hasn’t been arrested by now .…. 🚔⛄️!
@@rosabarillas8712 she’s guilty. Hopefully jury will get it right next trial.
Here's a crazy thought, maybe look inside the house for evidence?! Maybe just rule out the possibility he went inside?
What a great idea 💡 ❤. What if any would have happened if they had? 😂
@@honey_bee_33 why are so hell bent on it not being Karen that did it? What else did she break her back light on after she had 9 drinks and her boyfriend never went in the house?
@@TheBebe2214 because when investigating a murder, you should want the police to look at all the possibilities. If you were accused of murder, wouldn't you want that? Wouldn't you want that as a juror so you can rule out any reasonable doubt.
Also, the FBI proved he didn't get hit by a car. You'd need 9 drinks to think he did.
Is it just me or does she look like An old Version of AOC
Who’s AOC?
@@ji5gz5fu3g Alexandria Ocasio Cortez
Not even a little bit😅
@@samplexample your either blind or just a cringe fan 😂
* Timeline | KR calls and texts to JO | Immediately after his phone stops moving
1. 12:32 am - JO's phone stopped showing any movement in the area where the SUV dropped him off.
2. 12:33 am to 12:41 am - KR called JO fifteen (15) times as she was driving back to his house (this is straight after (allegedly) just dropping JO off and nothing serious/wrong happening and her stating she left because she had "stomach issues").
3. 12:37 am (in between the above time) - KR left a voicemail screaming: "John I f'ing HATE you!"
4. 12:41 am to 12:55 am - There are no calls or texts within these fourteen (14) minutes after she gets to JO's house.
5. 12:55 am - KR text JO: "I'm going home" and "I'll see you later".
6. 12:58 am to 1:00 am - KR called JO five (5) times.
7. 01:00 am - KR text JO: "Your kids are f'ing alone".
8. 01:04 am - KR text JO: "I'm back in Mansfield" (which we know from the trial was untrue).
9. 01:09 am - KR called her parents - no answer.
10. 01:10 am to 01:18 am - KR called JO eleven (11) times (this is around thirty (30) minutes or so since (allegedly) just dropping JO off and nothing serious/wrong happening and her stating she left because she had "stomach issues").
* However, for example:
1. KR called and texted JO thirty-five (35) times in less than an hour, but if she was so worried why didn't she try to call any of his friends?
2. If KR just dropped JO off at the party (as she said because she just had "stomach issues"):
(a) Why did she start frantically calling him fifteen (15) times after just dropping him off?
(b) Why didn't she call someone at the party when he failed to answer his phone?
3. Why didn't KR call the Police for help searching for JO, at any time.
4. What was KR doing in the fourteen (14) minutes after arriving back at JO's when her phone had no activity - did she go back to Fairview Road and see JO on the ground injured, then go back to his house and start panicking?
5. KR's version of events makes not much sense when you review the calls and texts pattern above?
CAN YOU SORT OUT PART TWO PLEASE.. it’s only a repeat of part 1!!!!
Did... did no one watch the trial? 😅
*Did the FKR’ers not get the memo and not aware of the recent public confirmations:
1. (08.22.24) By the FKR main blogger - nothing will ever happen to the Alberts, etc, including no charges being laid. Why would he say this if he’s so sure of the “alleged” third-party culprit, frame job and conspiracy and it was he that started the whole thing off (with KR’s help according to court documents in his case) - go figure.
2. (08.23.24) By Ted Daniel (Boston 25) - the FBI investigation was wrapped up a while ago after the FBI found no crimes were committed (no evidence of KR’s allegations as to a “third-party culprit”, “frame job” and “conspiracy” as per the 3,074 page report (said to be April 24) given to KR and her defense team).
3. (09.03.24) By an ex-FBI agent - there is a weaponisation of social media, evidence has been bastardised to what the true reality is, there are hundreds of communications between KR and the blogger (facing eighteen felony charges), to believe this “pretend notion” that KR has done nothing wrong and the conspiracy they entered into to carry out the allegations of KR, to turn away from the facts and circumstances that KR talked about in her interviews and her lawyer saying from the get go it was just an accident, which will all be ugly and eye opening, and will come out in the civil case against KR (rules are less restrictive) which is a strong case and will be won.
*Yet the FKR’ers still continue to repeat themselves with allegations that are unproven, probably won’t even be relied upon at the retrial, and ultimately go nowhere 🥱!
FREE KAREN READ
*Did the FKR’ers not get the memo and not aware of the recent public confirmations:
1. (08.22.24) By the FKR main blogger - nothing will ever happen to the Alberts, etc, including no charges being laid. Why would he say this if he’s so sure of the “alleged” third-party culprit, frame job and conspiracy and it was he that started the whole thing off (with KR’s help according to court documents in his case) - go figure.
2. (08.23.24) By Ted Daniel (Boston 25) - the FBI investigation was wrapped up a while ago after the FBI found no crimes were committed (no evidence of KR’s allegations as to a “third-party culprit”, “frame job” and “conspiracy” as per the 3,074 page report (said to be April 24) given to KR and her defense team).
3. (09.03.24) By an ex-FBI agent - there is a weaponisation of social media, evidence has been bastardised to what the true reality is, there are hundreds of communications between KR and the blogger (facing eighteen felony charges), to believe this “pretend notion” that KR has done nothing wrong and the conspiracy they entered into to carry out the allegations of KR, to turn away from the facts and circumstances that KR talked about in her interviews and her lawyer saying from the get go it was just an accident, which will all be ugly and eye opening, and will come out in the civil case against KR (rules are less restrictive) which is a strong case and will be won.
*Yet the FKR’ers still continue to repeat themselves with allegations that are unproven, probably won’t even be relied upon at the retrial, and ultimately go nowhere 🥱!
Crocodile tears and lies. Karen Read is guilty and trying to cover her actions with media spin. Justice for John Okeefe.
she is guilty of dating down. She had to mingle with the corrupt cops
She showed more emotion here than during the trial.
@@VintageRed411 they specifically tell you not to show emotion during trial
This was filmed 18 months ago, and lawyers tell you not to show emotion in a trial .
@@bobbylupo1571 I'm not so sure. Showing emotion at the autopsy photos would at least get some people to believe she loved him. She seems so cold in court. As a juror, her smiling, joking as if this weren't a big deal, and lack of emotion where others showed it would absolutely concern me.
@@VintageRed411 she lost her job, car, reputation and bf I’m sure she cried every tear out over the past couple years she needs to show strength and wants to get her life back your making it seem like that’s the first time she saw those photos. And when everyone is corrupt around you including the judge n detectives it’s almost comical like this can’t be happening
@@VintageRed411😢
John O Keefe Potentially Wearing NIke Shoes 👟 SLIPS On Ice 🧊 & Snow ❄️ Into A Backing SUV Vehicle 🚗 &/or SUV 🚙 Wheels SLIDE Unintentionally : Purely Accidental
* Timeline | "Alleged" third-party culprit, frame job and conspiracy theory
1. Feb 2, 22 - arraignment charges of manslaughter, motor vehicle homicide and leaving the scene of a motor vehicle collision causing death - bail $50k.
2. June 10, 22 - arraignment charges upgraded to second degree manslaughter while operating under the influence of alcohol and leaving the scene of personal injury and death - bail $100k.
3. Sept 22, 22 - AJ joined the defense team.
4. April 17, 23 - KR took deliberate action and provided the blogger with confidential information in more than forty (40) hours of conversations during one hundred and eighty-nine (189) phone calls and via other methods of communication (reports online as to the evidence in the bloggers case and court documents).
5. Further, it's also been:
(a). Stated; there are hundreds (100’s) of communications between KR and the blogger, to believe the “pretend notion” of which are ugly and eye opening and will come out in the civil case (ex-FBI agent - 09.03.24)
(b). Alleged; KR kept LE waiting for two hours whilst she deleted things from her phone, there is a receipt from KR’s brother’s Lexus/Toyota dealership for the bloggers Lexus vehicle, and Venmo payments made to the blogger, of which LE obtained.
(c). Alleged; the defense team also met and had hours of phone calls with the blogger.
6. April 23 - The blogger started spreading the “alleged” third-party culprit, frame job and conspiracy theory.
7. May 3, 23 - The defense team started raising the “alleged” third-party culprit, frame job and conspiracy theory, etc, in court, for the first time (as I understand it) since JO’s passing on 01.29.22.
8. Aug 23 - TODAY KR interview. Raising the “alleged” third-party culprit, frame job and conspiracy theory.
9. Oct 23 - ABC News Nightline KR interview. Raising the “alleged” third-party culprit, frame job and conspiracy theory.
* The timing of what is said, is just as important as what is said and why. In these circumstances the "alleged" third-party culprit, frame job and conspiracy theory, was not said from JO’s passing on 01.29.22 (nor via KR’s arraignments in Feb and June 22) until such time as 05.03.23 (when the allegations were first raised in court).
She keeps her lips puckered so.she can't lie anymore .. She is a evil and I pray she gets locked up
She’s worse than evil
@KnucklSandwich Is that you Karen or her gf/bf (ewww). We get you are upset because the only thing more destroyed than KR’s taillight is her dodgy defense. Try not to let that, and others words and facts, worry you so much. It’s the public that needs to worry if KR does jail time, then gets out, and becomes an Uber driver - talk about depopulation! We know you stand behind her - just not when she’s reversing right! Stay safe out there!
⚖️🙏🏻 for Officer John O’Keefe.
@KnucklSandwich * Did the FKR’ers not get the memo and not aware of the recent public confirmations:
1. (08.22.24) By the FKR main blogger - nothing will ever happen to the Alberts, etc, including no charges being laid. Why would he say this if he’s so sure of the “alleged” third-party culprit, frame job and conspiracy and it was he that started the whole thing off (with KR’s help according to court documents in his case) - go figure.
2. (08.23.24) By Ted Daniel (Boston 25) - the FBI investigation was wrapped up a while ago after the FBI found no crimes were committed (no evidence of KR’s allegations as to a “third-party culprit”, “frame job” and “conspiracy” as per the 3,074 page report (said to be April 24) given to KR and her defense team).
3. (09.03.24) By an ex-FBI agent - there is a weaponisation of social media, evidence has been bastardised to what the true reality is, there are hundreds of communications between KR and the blogger (facing eighteen felony charges), to believe this “pretend notion” that KR has done nothing wrong and the conspiracy they entered into to carry out the allegations of KR, to turn away from the facts and circumstances that KR talked about in her interviews and her lawyer saying from the get go it was just an accident, which will all be ugly and eye opening, and will come out in the civil case against KR (rules are less restrictive) which is a strong case and will be won.
*Yet the FKR’ers still continue to repeat themselves with allegations that are unproven, probably won’t even be relied upon at the retrial, and ultimately go nowhere 🥱!
you pray to the devil, my friend
After watching the full 2020 interview it’s clear she was very drunk and hit him with her vehicle. Whether she did it on purpose or not is the question.
Did you see the independent accident reconstruction experts testimony at first trial? 2 people of which has more education than any expert who works at the MSP. They said no way Karen hit him and BTW they were hired by the FBI and DOJ not the defense. Try looking at evidence and not your emotions of how someone looks.
Try watching the actual *full* *trial* . You may change your mind.
But I guess you only have time for mass media junk and the attention span of a 5 year-old.
@@gmpick9793 How about you start looking at things objectively:
1. The external company (ARCCA - litigation consultants HIRED AND NOT EMPLOYED BY THE FBI) did not conclusively say; that JO was not hit by a vehicle/car/SUV, nor that KR’s SUV did not hit JO, nor that it was impossible, and nor that 100% it did not happen (nor for that matter that it looked like JO was beaten and bitten and scratched by a dog).
2. They said quote: “We concede there simply is not enough evidence to DETERMINE that Mr. O’Keefe was hit by an automobile”. Thus, not enough evidence that THEY had for them to say that JO was hit by KR’s SUV.
3. If they had arrived at the conclusion that JO definitively was not hit by KR’s SUV, that would be exculpatory evidence and the charges against KR would have been dropped by now, and potentially with further indictments/charges being issued/laid against another person/s.
4. The experts admitted:
(a). They had only been given a selected quantity of file material and had no say in what was given to them.
(b). They had not seen any actual evidence, including KR’s SUV, which has a rear spoiler (sticking out above the rear window/hatch) and only saw photographs, and had not been provided with other related information/material/evidence.
(c). Whilst one of the experts (Wolfe) specialises in lighting, optics, visibility and Lexus/Toyota (KR’s SUV) tech stream vehicle data (which verified an accident with KR’s SUV at this time), he did not review the SUV data, nor do any testing or analysis in his areas of expertise.
(d). They were told they could only consider what they had been provided with and must not do any outside research, nor seek any further material, etc, from anywhere/anyone.
(e). There were no reports or videos of any testing from what I recall.
5. A report/opinion/theory cannot be based on partial information and testing, etc, and is not sufficient to give a 100% accurate account that can be relied upon and cannot be regarded as undisputed scientific facts and just an opinion based on partial information, therefore deemed bogus and junk science.
6. All things MUST be sighted and considered to reach a proper and accurate conclusion. As per this company’s own website and that all data, etc, must be collected in order to create an accurate reconstruction of an accident.
@KnucklSandwich 1. The external company (ARCCA - litigation consultants HIRED AND NOT EMPLOYED BY THE FBI) did not conclusively say; that JO was not hit by a vehicle/car/SUV, nor that KR’s SUV did not hit JO, nor that it was impossible, and nor that 100% it did not happen (nor for that matter that it looked like JO was beaten and bitten and scratched by a dog).
2. They said quote: “We concede there simply is not enough evidence to DETERMINE that Mr. O’Keefe was hit by an automobile”. Thus, not enough evidence that THEY had for them to say that JO was hit by KR’s SUV.
3. If they had arrived at the conclusion that JO definitively was not hit by KR’s SUV, that would be exculpatory evidence and the charges against KR would have been dropped by now, and potentially with further indictments/charges being issued/laid against another person/s.
4. The experts admitted:
(a). They had only been given a selected quantity of file material and had no say in what was given to them.
(b). They had not seen any actual evidence, including KR’s SUV, which has a rear spoiler (sticking out above the rear window/hatch) and only saw photographs, and had not been provided with other related information/material/evidence.
(c). Whilst one of the experts (Wolfe) specialises in lighting, optics, visibility and Lexus/Toyota (KR’s SUV) tech stream vehicle data (which verified an accident with KR’s SUV at this time), he did not review the SUV data, nor do any testing or analysis in his areas of expertise.
(d). They were told they could only consider what they had been provided with and must not do any outside research, nor seek any further material, etc, from anywhere/anyone.
(e). There were no reports or videos of any testing from what I recall.
5. A report/opinion/theory cannot be based on partial information and testing, etc, and is not sufficient to give a 100% accurate account that can be relied upon and cannot be regarded as undisputed scientific facts and just an opinion based on partial information, therefore deemed bogus and junk science.
6. All things MUST be sighted and considered to reach a proper and accurate conclusion. As per this company’s own website and that all data, etc, must be collected in order to create an accurate reconstruction of an accident.
@@miltdta *Did the FKR’ers not get the memo and not aware of the recent public confirmations:
1. (08.22.24) By the FKR main blogger - nothing will ever happen to the Alberts, etc, including no charges being laid. Why would he say this if he’s so sure of the “alleged” third-party culprit, frame job and conspiracy and it was he that started the whole thing off (with KR’s help according to court documents in his case) - go figure.
2. (08.23.24) By Ted Daniel (Boston 25) - the FBI investigation was wrapped up a while ago after the FBI found no crimes were committed (no evidence of KR’s allegations as to a “third-party culprit”, “frame job” and “conspiracy” as per the 3,074 page report (said to be April 24) given to KR and her defense team).
3. (09.03.24) By an ex-FBI agent - there is a weaponisation of social media, evidence has been bastardised to what the true reality is, there are hundreds of communications between KR and the blogger (facing eighteen felony charges), to believe this “pretend notion” that KR has done nothing wrong and the conspiracy they entered into to carry out the allegations of KR, to turn away from the facts and circumstances that KR talked about in her interviews and her lawyer saying from the get go it was just an accident, which will all be ugly and eye opening, and will come out in the civil case against KR (rules are less restrictive) which is a strong case and will be won.
*Yet the FKR’ers still continue to repeat themselves with allegations that are unproven, probably won’t even be relied upon at the retrial, and ultimately go nowhere 🥱!
RodBradleyBETHAL is SA CHILDREN ON MISSION TRIPS IN RWANDA
Pakistan ma Christians ki help Kara please help
Karen Read is Norman Bates in disguise as his own mother.
Twisted Karens nose grows by the day. I saw John. With my X-ray vision. I knew it was him because I lost my marbles at 12:32 and was doing my target practice on great man John.
Then i thought I’d leave him freeze for a few hours as I needed a nap. Then woke up and thought, a plow hit him would be good fairy tale.
Then I’ll just blame anyone and everyone I can.
@KnucklSandwichJethro. You still hoppin.
@KnucklSandwich *Did the FKR’ers not get the memo and not aware of the recent public confirmations:
1. (08.22.24) By the FKR main blogger - nothing will ever happen to the Alberts, etc, including no charges being laid. Why would he say this if he’s so sure of the “alleged” third-party culprit, frame job and conspiracy and it was he that started the whole thing off (with KR’s help according to court documents in his case) - go figure.
2. (08.23.24) By Ted Daniel (Boston 25) - the FBI investigation was wrapped up a while ago after the FBI found no crimes were committed (no evidence of KR’s allegations as to a “third-party culprit”, “frame job” and “conspiracy” as per the 3,074 page report (said to be April 24) given to KR and her defense team).
3. (09.03.24) By an ex-FBI agent - there is a weaponisation of social media, evidence has been bastardised to what the true reality is, there are hundreds of communications between KR and the blogger (facing eighteen felony charges), to believe this “pretend notion” that KR has done nothing wrong and the conspiracy they entered into to carry out the allegations of KR, to turn away from the facts and circumstances that KR talked about in her interviews and her lawyer saying from the get go it was just an accident, which will all be ugly and eye opening, and will come out in the civil case against KR (rules are less restrictive) which is a strong case and will be won.
*Yet the FKR’ers still continue to repeat themselves with allegations that are unproven, probably won’t even be relied upon at the retrial, and ultimately go nowhere 🥱!
@KnucklSandwich Is that you Karen (dirty deed) Read (seeing as you are calling people names) or her gf/bf. We get you are upset because the only thing more destroyed than KR’s taillight is her dodgy defense. Try not to let that, and others words and facts, worry you so much. It’s the public that needs to worry if KR does jail time, then gets out, and becomes an Uber driver - talk about depopulation! We know you stand behind her - just not when she’s reversing right! Stay safe out there!
⚖️🙏🏻 for Officer John O’Keefe.
the corrupt McAlberts are going down. Sooner or later. Justice for Sandra Birchmore!
@KnucklSandwich In what regard? What part of the above do you not understand? Also, can’t take the FK’ers seriously: stating, amongst other things, the FBI were going to come charging in to the trial and arrest everyone and LE didn’t have JO’s missing sneaker, belt and cap - all proven untrue 👋🏻
Will the West Bank become a ‘third front’? Tensions are at their highest since the Gaza War
Who cares