Whats better than one Thunder cat?? 2 THUNDERCATS!

แชร์
ฝัง
  • เผยแพร่เมื่อ 19 ธ.ค. 2024

ความคิดเห็น • 55

  • @zx9green791
    @zx9green791 หลายเดือนก่อน +2

    I absolutely love your channel! My current cat's are 2009 M8, 2009 M6, 2005 M5. I grew up with the 1990's Cats. The first Arctic Cat I ever rode was a 1996 ZRT 600 mountain cat 136 inch track. It blew my mind!

    • @OldSchoolArcticCats
      @OldSchoolArcticCats  หลายเดือนก่อน

      Thank you so much for your support! I love sharing my passion of Old School Cats with everyone. I appreciate the comment!

  • @mross302
    @mross302 17 วันที่ผ่านมา +1

    From experience, 350hp is no problem for a diamond drive, I know of and had the pleasure of working on a smart car that was swapped with a z1 turbo engine and diamond drive on slicks with a wheelie bar and parachute with a 350hp tune and he has never broken it.

  • @brunosclassiccargarage1968
    @brunosclassiccargarage1968 20 วันที่ผ่านมา +1

    i have never blown a diamond drive even on my turbo sleds but i always change the oil every 2 rides to the mountains that way i can see if there is any glitter like material which is bearing material then you know its time to replace the bearings. hopefully you didnt spike the rpm when the track blew. that can take out the crank on a 1000. great videos. these old diamond drive cats are the easiest sleds to do a track change

    • @OldSchoolArcticCats
      @OldSchoolArcticCats  20 วันที่ผ่านมา

      The diamond drive system was a good system. They could take a lot of HP & torque. Maintenance was key. Thanks for the comment.

  • @larrywarner9314
    @larrywarner9314 หลายเดือนก่อน +2

    Diamond drive was a great setup if you did the regular maintenance on the unit

  • @gregmulfort9577
    @gregmulfort9577 หลายเดือนก่อน +2

    The diamond drives were great. Lighter weight, lower center of gravity, less rotating weight. Extremely reliable. The zr900 used a funny collar connection to the driveshaft instead of the 16mm bolt and that connection was a problem, but all the gear cases were solid. I've had a zr900 since new, I put 8,000 miles on a z1 turbo with 260hp, my buddy has a 2010 f8, all good diamond drives!
    When you take the driveshaft out, be sure to check the bearings in the caliper for the shaft. There are two bearings. One can be bad and the shaft still spins nice but there's only one good bearing instead of two. Those caliper bearings can go, I replaced one in my zr900. Only found it because I had shaft out and checked it. Those bearings will never fail at a convenient time.

    • @jeffreyhagelin3672
      @jeffreyhagelin3672 หลายเดือนก่อน

      @@gregmulfort9577 My concern would be with the minimal clearances for the drivers, requiring a tighter than normal track and little to no application of the brake.
      Studs drive themselves into the bulkhead and disastrous results like we've seen.

    • @gregmulfort9577
      @gregmulfort9577 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

      @jeffreyhagelin3672 I don't understand your concerns at all. My z1 turbo would skip drivers on the track but that wasn't a diamond drive issue, that was the single ply track stretching no matter how tight you set it, would still stretch under load. New 2 ply fixed that. But even with track skipping bad, never did any damage. The diamond drive brakes the driveshaft, so you always have brakes as long as you have a track (unlike the old jackshaft sleds). You always want the track to be tight enough where it's not moving up the drivers anyway, if it's moving up them, that's friction and wasted energy. And I don't get the stud comment, studs can be pulled out on any application, diamond drive doesn't make that issue worse.

    • @OldSchoolArcticCats
      @OldSchoolArcticCats  หลายเดือนก่อน

      Thanks for sharing your experience, the diamond drives were great. 👍

    • @jeffreyhagelin3672
      @jeffreyhagelin3672 หลายเดือนก่อน

      @@gregmulfort9577 The physically short length of the diamond drive is the issue. This has nothing to do with track selection, the Artic Cat brand or election interference in Georgia.
      I merely stated that a change over to a drop and roll conversion would alleviate the problem, along with adding higher performance through less rolling resistance.. Perhaps this is why we no longer see the diamond drive in production.

    • @jeffreyhagelin3672
      @jeffreyhagelin3672 หลายเดือนก่อน

      Higher track speeds on a studded track places high centrifugal loads causing the track to balloon inside the the tunnel, particularly at both ends as the track tries to bend itself into a circle. This is where the studs will try to pull away from the driver's seat hit the bulkhead unless the track is tightened higher to adjust and compensate. I'm referring to racing speeds approaching and exceeding speeds of 100 mph

  • @jameskirk5906
    @jameskirk5906 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

    Love the Thundercat rockets!

  • @kollinspencer847
    @kollinspencer847 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

    Happy that Eric is doing better. That green thunder cat is rad! You should post a short of it idling I bet those psi pipes sounds awesome.

  • @anger806
    @anger806 หลายเดือนก่อน +2

    That 00 tcat has what looks like 2002 running boards

  • @Chadsstickystuffakaglue
    @Chadsstickystuffakaglue หลายเดือนก่อน +4

    Have you ever tried changing the springs in the clutches. My grandpa used to put in different springs for better lunch an higher speed on his thundercat an it was a nasty sled very fast an no one could ever keep up with his sled an he would change the springs an add dots or different color to keep them guessing. Miss the sled had nos on it as well

    • @OldSchoolArcticCats
      @OldSchoolArcticCats  หลายเดือนก่อน +1

      Your grandpa sounds like a real cool guy!

    • @Chadsstickystuffakaglue
      @Chadsstickystuffakaglue หลายเดือนก่อน

      @@OldSchoolArcticCats thank you he was legendary for sure an loved speed. He had a 93 thundercat an build a turbo 580 powder special that was scary fast when it was on boost

    • @crsracing1313
      @crsracing1313 27 วันที่ผ่านมา +1

      My dad used to know a guy about 20 years ago that around 10 years prior (so now 30 years ago) was a cat mechanic for the #1 race team in the country, and idk the exact specs but one of his tricks was using Polaris weights when he clutched his cats. My dad had a 99 tcat, clean sled. Never cracked the heads but he had aftermarket can on it, ripsaw track, reeds, and studs. He dropped it off to that guy and he rejetted his carbs, gutted the airbox, did a 3° timing key, and worked his magic with the clutches… my dads sled was never beat as far average trail sleds went. Polaris weights man… wild stuff. Whole point is sounds like your gramps was on to something for sure.

    • @Chadsstickystuffakaglue
      @Chadsstickystuffakaglue 27 วันที่ผ่านมา +2

      @crsracing1313 thank you he was all about speed an going fast. An tuning. Thank you for telling your story. Stay ski side down an flat out

  • @fasterdura1772
    @fasterdura1772 หลายเดือนก่อน +5

    Every cat that has a 3 pitch track needs a antistab kit. You will never have a track fail again.

    • @jeffreyhagelin3672
      @jeffreyhagelin3672 หลายเดือนก่อน

      @@fasterdura1772 They all fail eventually.

    • @fasterdura1772
      @fasterdura1772 หลายเดือนก่อน

      @ agreed. I’ve been around the sled scene from day 1. We all seen our stupid mistakes but more human error. We’ve beat tracks till lugs come off. A track snapping is 2/10. Trust me. I’m old. Like raisin. 😱😂. Everyone loosens them dam limiters opening a sunlight to a large hole that invites a nice worn out rail tip. 💣

    • @jeffreyhagelin3672
      @jeffreyhagelin3672 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

      @@fasterdura1772 I'm old too.... Old enough to realize lifting the skis is a waste of horsepower and the first sure sign that' showing off means they're going to be the first ones to get beat

    • @fasterdura1772
      @fasterdura1772 หลายเดือนก่อน

      @ amen brother 👏😂😂😂😂

  • @jonholland581
    @jonholland581 หลายเดือนก่อน

    I think the other reason that they ditched the diamond drive was to save weight. Having the engine just run in reverse versus a whole gearbox

  • @larrywarner9314
    @larrywarner9314 หลายเดือนก่อน +2

    I owned four of them.

  • @jeffreyhagelin3672
    @jeffreyhagelin3672 หลายเดือนก่อน +2

    You need a drop and roll chain case to get more room between the sprocket driver and the bulkhead..at the expense of losing the diamond...
    I'm certainly not trying to rattle anybody's cage I'm just trying to explain why the D drive with it's shorter overall length might hinder performance characteristics at racing speeds approaching and exceeding 100 mph.

  • @davidbrennan5
    @davidbrennan5 หลายเดือนก่อน

    Pulled about 70 Cats off the lake with diamond drives, 04 was the worst. I think they did some updates in later years but still saw many that blew and a lot of them had 700-1300 miles or so. The drive axle splines fail or they fail internally. They can take big power but gear changes are not easy and its expensive for the parts. I would not run one personally.

  • @rickparadis9926
    @rickparadis9926 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

    that hat is killer. i have a 2000 t-cat and my son has a 99 t-cat. where can i find 2 hats.

  • @Kq750.
    @Kq750. หลายเดือนก่อน +1

    What do you think about 98 tcat??

    • @OldSchoolArcticCats
      @OldSchoolArcticCats  หลายเดือนก่อน +1

      I think they are awesome. I would debate that the 99 was a little faster… Same HP lighter chassis with an aluminum bulk head..

    • @Kq750.
      @Kq750. หลายเดือนก่อน

      @@OldSchoolArcticCats iam in Ontario Canada one for sale 2600.00

    • @OldSchoolArcticCats
      @OldSchoolArcticCats  หลายเดือนก่อน

      I think that is a great price, depending on the condition of course..

  • @joshpitts7256
    @joshpitts7256 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

    XCR 800

  • @larrywarner9314
    @larrywarner9314 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

    They made them for two years 1979 and 1980

  • @skulldigger5056
    @skulldigger5056 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

    New vid, hell ya

  • @slickpete8997
    @slickpete8997 หลายเดือนก่อน +3

    I mean no harm and not talking shit but I can just about promise you that sled is no where near 230hp. I’ve been around some very fast drag sleds and I know a good running Prostock 1000 is right around 220 to 230hp. I’d say if you got 200hp you are making a lot of power with that sled then.

    • @joshgessinger4509
      @joshgessinger4509 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

      Actually a 1000 Suzuki twin makes 220 easy with pipes reads heads. Makes 188hp with just a Y pipe. Can look it up on dynotech research but it $30 a year.

    • @clintbruderer2278
      @clintbruderer2278 หลายเดือนก่อน +2

      You just admitted a good running Prostock 220 plus. Thanks for verifying what Rocky said. This engine is far from stock and runs 112 octane

    • @codyflowers9804
      @codyflowers9804 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

      A fully race ported 1000 twin has the potential to make those numbers but it takes someone that has alot of time porting and tuning these motors to make that in race form. A trail form twin piped 1000 is maybe making 180. These motors were only 165 hp stock. You aren’t adding 65 horse with pipes and a boondocker

    • @slickpete8997
      @slickpete8997 หลายเดือนก่อน

      @@clintbruderer2278 you obviously know nothing about making HP in a two stroke engine. If his sled makes that much power he ought to bring it to a real drag race like Haydays and find out where he stands amongst the rest of the sleds that make 220hp plus.

    • @clintbruderer2278
      @clintbruderer2278 หลายเดือนก่อน +2

      @@slickpete8997 I obviously no nothing lol. I’m a former Professional racer RMSHA 1000 Improved and 800 Improved as well as 2nd in points in a Pro drag circuit. I’m a business owner and hundreds of Snowmobile dealerships and shops sell my products. Have you heard of D&D racing? They sell my products. Have you heard of Western Power Sports? They are my wholesaler. Have you heard of Rocky Mountain Atv MC? They sell my products. I’m sure you’re a great guy and I appreciate your comments!

  • @yoshy4072
    @yoshy4072 หลายเดือนก่อน

    Well you got the wrong ones, the 98 was the fastest of them all.

  • @joshkoltes
    @joshkoltes หลายเดือนก่อน +1

    Rmi not bdx

  • @billreichheld4839
    @billreichheld4839 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

    m 1000 162 horsepower