Wheels on a trebuchet?
ฝัง
- เผยแพร่เมื่อ 12 ก.ค. 2018
- NOTE: the efficiencies I mention are actually the MOMENTUM efficiencies of the trebuchet. The actual energy efficiency of this final design on wheels is 46.7%. The actual energy efficiency of the fixed frame was 37.4%.
Physics tracker software: physlets.org/tracker/
Enjoy my videos? Want to see more? I upload bonus footage/extra information to my Patreon page: / tomstanton
3D Printer filament sponsored by 3D Printz UK: 3dprintz.co.uk/
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
My Other Equipment:
Main camera - amzn.to/2vlvlC6
Main lens - amzn.to/2gMrhru
Main tripod - amzn.to/2tqRjBt
Secondary Tripod - amzn.to/2t1NkMh
Microphone - amzn.to/2uuv9n0
Audio recorder - amzn.to/2v3mjcG
Banggood affiliate: www.banggood.com/?p=LT0710618...
---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- - วิทยาศาสตร์และเทคโนโลยี
![[MIRRORED] LISA - ROCKSTAR 🎸 MV version #LISA #BLACKPINK #ROCKSTAR](http://i.ytimg.com/vi/-U58DuCCtZk/mqdefault.jpg)
Some poor farmer's going to be incredibly confused when they find a bunch of tennis balls in their field.
12:41
Snaily and craters from wherever they landed
@David It makes more sense to compare efficiency. He could jack up the weight and it would go a lot farther.
It would be worse if he found only one and then got pelted by 5 supersonic tennis balls though. Then he would run to yell at tom, and have a heart attack thinking he was a time traveler. Imagine that video.
@@wheelslifts851 The balls were no where near supersonic speeds though. The speed of sound is 343 m/s and the balls were launched at roughly 55 m/s but I bet that farmer would be yelling of pain anyway and come after Tom anyway lol
Any truth to the rumor that this will be available from IKEA sold in a flat-pack? Will they call it Flingå?
IKEA names is not random. Beds are named after places in Norway, outdoor furniture after Scandinavian islands etc. Though some things that doesn't fit nicely in one of the categories are named after some Swedish word that is somehow related to it's function. So unless trebuchets is considered garden furniture, it could be called "kasta" (throw) or "skjuta" (shoot).
I don't think "flingå" is a word in Swedish, but "å" is a word for river in Scandinavian so it could hypothetically be a river.
@@SteinGauslaaStrindhaug r/ whoosh
@@burkhardtniec3653 No, I know it's a joke. I'm just being needlessly pedantic
@halnywiatr made me laugh
@Stein Gauslaa Strindhaug floored me with knowledge. Well done.
Stein Gauslaa Strindhaug. Doesn’t pedantic inherently mean “needlessly pedantic?”
You should enter the "Pumpkin Chunkin'" contest. I'm not sure if they have international contests though. They have trebuchets and pneumatic cannons and spinning arm pumpkin tossing competitions. All these seem right squarely in your field of study!
Oh hell yes!
I always thought those were really cool
Last I checked, that event had been cancelled. I'm not sure they'll be coming back. There was a personal injury lawsuit after someone was hurt.
Evan M. Jones rip
The worst part is the guy who sued was hurt riding a quad bike and it had nothing to do with chunkin punkins. What an asshat.
A friend of mine made a trebucket (it is when he's made it). I think he got about everything wrong then he saw your vid with the whip trebuchet. How could something so wrong go even "wronger". The trebucket is now precisely balanced and set up to launch a cricket ball nearly a foot straight down into the ground.
XDXD This made me laugh my ass off! I need to see this!
@@ericolens3 Hes calling it a trebucket probably because he used a bucket for the counterweight.
😂
Can you please optimise it a little more so it's 69% efficient... that is all.
Matthew Evans 69% efficient is not shoddy.
68% is shoddy, 69% is perfect, 70% is too much :)
Add just enough weight to the frame to increase it to 69%. Reduce the little bunny hop it does, thatll get it to 69% haha
Spencer Coleman cast iron wheels
This is where 6 9 started
I've been teaching people about synchronizing the stall points for years. Nice to see it quantified.
Me Too!
Your video should be required viewing for Physics 101 classes. The presentation is great and your enthusiasm is infectious. It also makes dry concepts much more exciting.
might as well, modern "scientists" don't seem to be learning anything anyway..
I was waiting for your best English pronunciation... and it didn't even happened!
Well done Tom, you truly know how to explain things.
Oh yes pronouncing words is hard 🍄
Amazing work, dude! Really nice! 😀
Thanks man!
you still need the frame weights with the wheels, supposed to roll, not jump in the air
Jusb1066 noticed that too
This is a test I'd be interested to see. Will a weighted, wheeled frame break 70% efficiency? Can we get the tennis ball to 140?
If the frame has more weight, it would take more energy to move it the same distance forward, which is the distance required so the counterweight falls directly down the whole time
But there's already wasted energy in the jumping around of the frame. The weights may damp that. Or not.
Yeah but if the frame is weighted to resist jumping, it might end up being less wasted energy. I think it's worth a test.
Launch a gopro!
Bill Codey Yes!
Good idea, even though in practice it'll end up a little complicated. This will require a lot of stabilisation if we want to see a smooth image rather than a shaking hell
It d be epic. Just add a spherical frame and fins to make it stable.. Otherwise a gyroscope inside the spherical frame
And add a parachute.
And fins to stabilize it.
A lot of maker videos are no longer explaining things, but instead show montages, etc. I love that you’re videos actually still dive into a subject. Loving this. BTW, Winston Moy has nice videos on CNC; in one of the previous videos you struggled with frizzy edges-you might want to look at his upcut, downcut, compression end mill video. Love the sound of the trebuchet. 👍
Time for a castle siege, I think we're ready.
the wheels also increase the hight, so unless the cross bars get in the way, that means you should be able to increase the length of the arm as well.
A old NOVA special covers this in great detail.
The wheels are originally intended for a fixed weight arm. The basket arm does most of what the wheeled fixed arm accomplished.
On a fixed arm, the weight falls in an arc like a pendulum. The wheels allow the frame to move forward, allowing the fixed arm weight to fall in a vertical line, taking out the arc of the pendulum. The vertical drop gathers more force than the arc.. it’s not the trebuchet moving forward... it’s the weight falling “faster.”
Amazing video dude! I have been trying to find videos on youtube about the physics of trebuchets and couldn't find a good insightful infomation about the specifics of how to build an efficent trebuchet until you started the trebuchet project. KEEP UP THE GOOD WORK!😄
I really like your work on this. Thank you. I wanted to add something. I heard that wheels were added to medieval trebuchets to reduce the strain on the support frame, aka 'the crushing lurch.' Fewer repairs, greater lifespan, etcetera. Of course, they were working on a much larger scale, under very different circumstances, but it's still worth mentioning. Thanks again for all your great videos and careful, skillful work!!
This is the video that introduced me to the Tracker software, and I've gone and introduced it to my team when developing the Mars helicopters. Thanks!
The entire arm from sling pouch to counterweight is a lever. At the ideal launch moment, the counterweight is behaving like a fulcrum. With a fully extended arm (moment of synchronized stalls), mark the counterweight as “A”, the arm’s pivot on the frame as “B”, and the pouch as “C”.
Take the wheeled frame’s speed of 1.2 m/s, divide it by distance AB, and multiply it by the distance AC. It should come close to your total speed improvement.
I hope that's a cup of tea you are drinking at 5:46. Tea has powered British ingenuity for centuries.
Gotta make one with my daughter for a yr 7 project/competition in Australia.
Very glad to have come across your work!.
Very impressive!.
I agree with a comment you received about showing the full journey of the payload for a bit of action.
Love it!.
Thanks mate!.
Hi Tom, I watch all your videos the day they come out...and today I joined your patreon. No idea why I haven't joined earlier. Keep the fantastic work up. I absolutely love your calm and analytical way of beeing fascinated.
Greetings from Switzerland
For the wheels, the suggestion probably comes from people who saw the PBS special on trebuchets and they got a great improvement from adding wheels - in that case it was more critical due to the massive size and risk of damage if wheels don't help dampen the rocking of the machine.
Great video, as always. I catch myself looking forward to the weekly video on Friday, by far my favorite channel. I should probably sign up with Patreon so you don't run out of tennis balls. Thank you for another high quality and proper engineering video.
Very well done, I enjoyed the journey through these videos. Your reveal of the result with the wheels was great. Thanks.
Wow, this is actually amazing. I don’t think research of this kind has been done on TH-cam, and it’s a mind blower. Keep up the fantastic work!!
This is bloody good work mate, keep it up!
This is my favourite TH-cam vid for a long time. Bloody well done!
The really good trebuchet vids that I’ve seen (MIT) use a stationary frame, but only the axle of the arm is on wheels. This allows the weight to drop nearly vertical. If the weight had no horizontal speed, then the potential is transferred more efficiently. You don’t have the mass of the frame being accelerated.
I really enjoyed watching this video, great work!
We need more Trebuchet stuff! Your videos are great!
Great video! I appreciate all the effort you put in this project.
Holy crap, dude! This is a brilliant series! And I am new to your channel! And I did subscribe/all! I am... like since yesterday you popped from “never heard of him” to “Top 3 TH-cam channels”. Seriously.
This has been WICKED cool... thank you for making my weekend better.
thank you for the technical bits, facinating
Physics is awesome! Very well done Tom, and i hope to see more like this :)
That was all jolly interested and clearly explained. It's good to see the proper detail in the way you went about designing and improving this trebuchet. I was actually sceptical that the wheels would help but I was wrong. It's always interesting to be wrong.
You have earned yourself a subscription.
THIS IS AMAZING! GREAT WORK!!! Adam Savage and Jamie Hyneman would be proud! Great experimenting and controlling the variables to make your trebuchet more efficient!! I really enjoyed watching this!
it looked so clean! no bouncing or anything. you can really see that its really important to sync up the stall points of the arm and the counterweight and the release of the ball.
I love your dedication to the scientific method, really great video!
Really been enjoying the trebuchet vids, cheers!
Love these engineering related videos, keep it up!
Great additional research and presentation!
That was really interesting! I'd watch more of these analysis videos. Still interested in watching more air pressure machines, but I'd also be interested in watching you throw some heavier items, like fruit or pumpkins.
Truly excellent video and project. A hearty thumbs up for doing replications and showing some data!!
Brilliant Video! Fantastic work!
Educating and entertaining, well done. I enjoy your videos very much!!
This is one of my favorite channels. He actually thinks about how he does his projects and learns things.
Great video Tom! Keep up the maths and that software!
You introduced that tracker software to me, and it's changed the way I analyze my PhD research! Thank You
Did you succeed in getting that PhD? 🍄
@@davidbergmann8948 I quit with a masters because my boss was an insufferable narcissist!
Build a set of rails for the wheels to roll on. That'll greatly reduce your rolling resistance and should allow the frame to accelerate faster. Also, maybe bearings on the wheels?
Awesome! Addressed questions I had myself after watching the first video
Nicely shaken down, Tom!
This was awesome! Perfect blend of engineering and fun.
This hurts my brain, but I can't stop watching your videos! Good stuff!
This is awesome! Real science and craftsmanship in practice. I gotta build me one eventually.
Excellent, fascinating - very happy to be a Patreon supporter :-)
This was the best and most inspiring mechanics lesson I ever watched.
Wow. That's awesome. Thanks for your work
Great set of videos! Trebuchets rocks. You may try a launch with the counterweight fixed to the arm, as the wheels will make the counterweight do a vertical fall instead of a circular movement.
very well-done. thank for your work.
What a cool series on mechanical optimization!
That's very interesting! Great work!
I have always been a fan of the trebuchet and I have really enjoyed your science. Well done, Tom! Can we have another video with more emphasis on the ball and the target? Thanks again!
Tom Stanton the reason why the wheels increase efficiency is not due to the velocity of the trebuchet moving forward, but what the moving forward allows the counter weight to do. Without the wheels the counterweight does more rotation, but with wheels the counterweight drops directly down decreasing the amount of energy lost due to it rotating back upward like a pendulum. It is the same reason why having the counterweight fixed to the arm is less efficient then having the small piece of wood as a go between. I drew a picture to illustrate the idea i.imgur.com/NjUtqmM.jpg track the weight with the aplet you are using to see the differences in the actual counterweight.
So it's similar to a floating-arm treb?
exactly my thought too. I was suprised nobpdy Else commented on the same
I hope he sees this comment because other people have comented other things that makes no sense. This is the true explanation
@@caracaes but he explained it quite well in the video. As he puts it the stall point of the weight and the arm are synchronized.
There are many ways to explain the same thing. All you want is as little energy left as possible.
This encompasses both explanations. Synchronizing the stall points means that at some point neither the arm nor the weight as much kinetic energy left. Having the weight drop straight down (as oppose to swing that wide circle) also means the weight has less kinetic energy left (otherwise it'd keep swinging).
See, in a way the video's explanation encompasses more than the one you so want him to see.
Coming in very late on this, I first came across the wheels-on-a-trebuchet issue many years ago in a Scrapyard Wars-type programme where the challenge was to throw a Mini. The reasoning given then was that with a simple trebuchet for best efficiency the weight needs to be able to drop vertically, hence the frame need to be able to move.
6 shots within 4 meters? That is some tight grouping, amazing accuracy!
This is just awesome! I realy enjoyed that.
I’ve been following your channel for a while, I’ve never felt compelled to comment before this video. It is both informational and entertaining… I was thinking he better do a slow-motion shot... Then there it was :-)! Cheers!
5:45 tea. He needs his cup of Tea.
Great work, Tom 🍄🍄🍄
Really interesting stuff!! Thanks for the video.
I see a future for you as a great physics teacher. Well explained
I've seen designs where instead of having the main arm attached with a fixed axle, you add wheels to that as well, and let it roll on a track on top of the frame. That way more energy is transferred.
Hey, nice video. I just need to add is this: 1m/s velocity change of an object traveling at 1m/s needs less energy compared to an object traveling at 2m/s. If you use 1/2mV^2 formula it's really easy to see. This is called Oberth's effect. You need less energy to make a slower thing go faster.
I've always thought it was because it let the counter weight fall straight down instead of in an arch which to me makes sense since the shortest distance between two points is a straight line your counter weight is using the same amount of energy over a shorter amount of time thus it would go faster.
By moving the frame forward you actually move the point of rotation of the arm as well. Look at the footage, the point of the rotation now closer to the weight which means you have a longer leaver to throw the projectile. +1 ms at the frame multiplies to +5 ms at the tip of the arm
Try building a fixed frame with the central Axle/arm assembly on a wheel - If the wheel is scaled well, then as the counter weight falls the whole thing will roll forward as the arm raises, and you waste less energy shifting the counterweight backwards before the arm reaches release point. You can bulk up the supporting frame to keep things stable without having to put any energy into moving said frame forward when firing.
Very educational! Awesome video(s)!
Great video, great analyse ! thx
I loved this series. My first building project was a trebuchet so it strikes a soft spot
The wheels are also moving the fulcrum (the hinge that the throwing arm spins around) forward which simulates a longer throwing arm. You could add the distance between where the hinge starts and where the hinge is when the projectile releases and I would guess that would be close to the distance between the end of the arm when stationary release and when its rolling release. Still awesome work Tom!
Gotta love that golden spiral the projectile makes.
That was very interesting. Thanks!
Tom, awesome videos. But since its summer and cricket season is on, can you do a launch of a cricket ball and see if you can thow it a 90mph, or thow it back in from the boundry line?
Plausible
The frame moving forward is not loosing energy, compared to not moving you are just not moving the planet as much. With regards efficiency of the device with wheels, the counterweight does move backwards as part of the rotational path, if instead of the weight moving backwards the fulcrum moved forward the lighter end of the arm gains more forward momentum. ie by adding wheels you are effectively changing the rotation point of the whole arm, moving the effective fulcrum closer to the counterweight and increasing the throw arm length just as it approaches the release. (see moving fulcrum trebuchets)
If you put markers on the arm you will see that the arm no longer rotates precisely around the axle but slightly closer to the counterweight as the frame moves forward.
To get even more energy out, try getting just the axle to move rather than the whole frame by putting it on a track on top of the frame.
great stuff ... learning loads
Amazing work
This video was worth watching to behold the extreme tidiness of that workshop, alone.
Adding the wheels doesn't delay the stall point of the counterweight, it increases the speed of the throwing arm so that it is in the vertical position when the counterweight stalls. Like a hoola-hooper has to rock back and forth at the right time to add speed to the hoop, the rocking of the trebuchet adds energy and speed to the arm.
This series has been excellent. So well presented and explained. Looks like it was fun, but quite a lot of work...
This is awesome dude, and very useful to know about tracker! downloading :)
tenacity patience and thoroughness
I endorsed - wheels and weights- or wheels restrained in channels to prevent frame lift
Very, very informative. Really love math based videos like this. You should tranfer some of this knowledge, software and physics basis to RC!!!
awesome video mate
Great instructional, thanks
Dang, that's pretty sick. It feels like a scratch I can't itch when you don't show how far the ball goes but this series was pretty great non the less.
Great work and research Tom.
The amazing fact to me is that the original designer of this machine achieved all this without the aid of modern day computers to analyse the performace. They would have had wheels to transport and manouver the machine into the attacking position. You certainly wouldn't want to be standing behind one when it was loosed....
Jeezus Tom, this could have been an educational video, like on e by Tom Scott or Veritasium. Well done dude. Incredible analysis.
Making the frame able to smoothly move during operation allows the counterweight to follow a more consistently vertical path from release to stall _and_ alleviates disruptive motion in the frame, effectively acting as a damper for the frame which simultaneously decreases unnecessary wear on the frame, improves accuracy and consistency, and improves the efficiency.
I mean, you're converting the gravitational potential of the counterweight into kinetic energy. ANY lateral motion of the counterweight is wasting that potential energy, so allowing the entire mechanism to move around it to ensure that the counterweight follows a perfectly vertical path will always improve the efficiency. The trick is in ensuring as much of that converted energy ends up in the projectile, of course.
Wheels add efficiency because it allows the weight to fall in a straighter line. Measure the horizontal motion of your weight with and without wheels. This is especially pronounced for fixed-weight trebuchets. Forcing the weight to move in a curve takes up a lot of kinetic energy.
Great video, just as always.