@@himagain803 no no, he just mentioned the lobster twice (or spells in American, or used his native way of spelling the word that is pronounced "meter")
My guess is he actually doubled the counting. He was at 110 while only having a few metres left and the final guess was 308 lobsters which could have been 154 windings.
Liza “It’s the sort of thing you dream about when you’re 7”. Cue Tim taking 15 minutes longer than anyone else to get to the caravan because he channelled his inner 7 year old self 🤣
It's a long standing taskmaster tradition for Alex to measure things in non-typical measurements, I'd have just taken the 308 lobsters as a final answer :D
Although Alex asks for the length of the lobster, in the studio results they have allowed for Tim to use "lobster" as a unit of measurement. In the caravan, Tim gives the length of the lobster as "about 30cm" but, in the studio, Alex provides Tim's guess using a different conversion (1 lobster = 1 foot) so we can assume Tim's conversion was not taken into account (the difference between a foot and 30cm is marginal but would make a big difference over a length so long).
@@mikegreen3485 even taking the fairly small difference into account, he was still closest by far... which is impressive luck given that one wrap round the lobster was waaay off a foot or 30cm & he only managed to get lucky based on the number of times he missed the lobster & wrapped his hand instead :p a true triumph of luck over skill.
I had high hopes for Alice, it initially seemed like she was going to apply some science and make a sensible attempt. I guess she didn't notice the lobster.
Or any unit of measurement, really. They just have to adhere to a consistent internal logic that people understand and can measure with. It's like the cup system in the US (for cooking, not measuring bra size). Remarkably simple but effective way of measuring out volumes, all you need is a set of measuring cups and you're away.
Well the metre was meant to be a fraction of the distance of the pole to the equator yet the French managed to get that wrong yet we've stuck with it. Old measurements were based off people. So they're all arbitrary really, yet the metre is technically wrong, you can't say the same about the stone however :P
@@peterclarke7240 No it's not, not at all! It's very easy to convert metric system units into other units. 1 mm = 1000 meter, 1meter = 1 kilometer. 1 squared meter = 1000 liter in volume. 1 ml = 1 liter. Water freezes at 0 degrees and it boils at 100 degrees. Now tell me, how many feet is a square mile? And what are the dimensions of a gallon?
@@taserrr ??? "How many feet is a square mile" Length =/= Area "Dimensions of a gallon" 3xLength =/= Volume Also, you've _completely_ missed the point they were making "They just have to adhere to a consistent internal logic that people understand and can measure with" People who grew up with and have used the imperial measurement system for most of their lives can easily use it Just because you yourself cannot doesn't mean it's impossible that it makes sense to others - especially those from hundreds of years ago who used imperial measurements every day their entire lives
@@Stevo_1998 No they can't I just explained why. Most people that grew up with imperial system don't know how many feet go into a mile or what the dimensions of a gallon are.
It's the same as "this flame". When she read it out, she identified the specific piece of string in question. The answer she gave was to a part of the specific string in question. Kind of clever, but I don't think it should count
Did the instructions specify not cutting the string? Because if not, "measure the string" could start to have an ambiguous meaning after it's cut and it's no longer one string but two. For instance, imagine if Alice had been asking Alex to point at the string that needs measured, and continue pointing even after she cuts it.
isnt the lobster method not SUPER wrong, but due to a mistake super right? He counted 308. 308 times wrapping around the lobster is actually 616 times the length of a lobster because you have 1 times the lenght going head to tail, and then 1 times the length going back tail to head. Estimating the lobster at 1 foot, he should have guessed 616 feet had he used this method correctly. However either his counting or his estimate of the lobster length is so far off, that he actually got really close to the correct answer by accident :D
based on the numbers he was saying, it looked to me like he probably counted to 154 and said 308 at the end to get his final answer, since he was barely over 100 by the time he did the whole ball.
The quickest and most accurate answer is to define the unit of measurement relative to the string. Tell em its 4 Glorfars and then tell em a Glorfar is a unit of measurement defined as that piece of string divided by 4.
I remember this saying rather well. Also the day I got the answer. A little old lady I was talking to responded with “twice as long as it is from the middle to the end”. Wise old lady 👍
Love how Liza has a multitool about her person. She seems like someone who'd bosh up a set of shelves during her lunchbreak without a moment's hesitation. My kind of lady. Plus she's not shy about knowing the best place for a profiterole, and the fastest way of getting it there. 😂
@@Echinacae the UK requires you to have a "valid reason" to carry anything larger than a few inches or anything locking or fixed. in this case using it to cut string seems like a valid reason to have a knife, and imo "so I don't accidentally close it on my fingers" is already inherently a valid reason for knives to lock
During Lisa's attempt you can see her name on the front of the tag 4:41, and as she pulls it through the room with red carpet the tag is upside-down and is BLANK on the back 4:43.
I think so too, I wish they'd shown us what was on it. Either that or there was nothing on it but had any of the contestants noticed it they might have assumed there was and forgotten about measuring and instead tried to pull the string as quickly as possible only to discover they had no answer for all their efforts upon getting it creating a comedic moment of disappointment had it happened. However since none of them got to the tag this moment was never created and so they never showed what was on it beyond showing Lisa's name on one side of it during her attempt. This might be more likely than it actually having the length, if it actually had the length I think they would've shown it at the end of Tim's attempt due to how close he was
Of course Tim would win the task and be stupidly close in such a Tim way 😂 Pretty amazing, I reckon if he’d managed to count that last bit of string at the 10 sec mark he would’ve got it almost spot on. Alice arguably could’ve won it if she’d reasoned well enough “how long is a piece of string? As long as you want it to be” or something similar. Depends on the wording of the task constraints.
I think it was likely a red herring, meant to distract the contestants from measuring if seen only to cause disappointment in anyone who did spend all their time reeling the string in only to discover it has no answer on upon getting it and they'd used all their time and done no counting. I think if it had the answer on we would've been shown at the end of Tim's attempt when he was so close to getting it but seemingly did not notice it. I imagine production probably put a lot of extra red herrings and/or legitimately helpful hidden "tools" into many of the tasks for enough of them to actually get noticed in some of the tasks and for them to get footage of them. There's probably a lot of red herrings/actually useful hints/clues/tools that just never get realised just to ensure that a few do and they get footage of those ones that do. It seems to have been implied before that there are tasks that the footage of never gets used and I imagine they do similarly there with tasks, adding more tasks than they'll use when editing to make sure they end up with enough tasks where the footage is able to be edited into a good outcome
Came here to ask the same. Nobody saw it, and normally when that happens they at least address it at the end ("Look under the table"), but they just didn't.
I think it probably wasn't on it. It was probably a red herring for any contestant who did notice it might've become distracted by it and tried to get all the string into the caravan instead of measuring only to be disappointed. Except since none of them noticed it and/or became misled by it it never amounted to anything. If it had had the answer on the backside (we see the front has Lisa's name on in her attempt) I think it would've been shown at the end of Tim's attempt due to how close he was. I imagine there's a lot of red herrings and/or actual additional clues for many of the tasks that never amount to anything as they must surely have to place a lot of them for contestants to not always just be looking for the "easy" way out in every task but also so that sometimes they do fall for red herrings and they get footage of it
@@georgedaniel1189 no I think it was absolutely there and that's why it teased it to us like 8 times. we're meant to know "okay they all missed it", it doesn't need to say anything more
I wonder how these tasks are being set up while the contestants are presumably already on the premises. Was there a lab-only task before and the crew arranged the string while that was being filmed?
@@yaoitiddieexpert1486 It takes a while yes, but contestants will do several tasks in a single day. So at some point, other tasks are being set up while the contestant is on the premises. They don't just turn up for one task at a time.
If it isn't a lab task, they're probably asked (while being watched) to stay in a certain room or the caravan, so they can't see what's going on. On a number of occasions we've seen them with cups of coffee/tea, so that's one way of keeping them in the kitchen.
There will be a canteen for food and a green room for waiting about. Thew are probably a couple of dozen crew around that need feeding etc. So plenty of places to wait.
@@kevinl3875the question was vague enough to give possiblities to argue. "This piece of string". It doesn't say exactly which piece. It doesn't say 'the whole string before you' or something.
Rhod Gilbert gets away with the ridiculous satsuma in A sock scenario and Alice can’t say how long “the piece” of string is, when it doesn’t say how long is the ball of string.
@@gyroscope915 Yeah exactly this, it also explains why Lee Mack got away with breaking the plates after completing the task but Joe Lycett still got penalised for eating chocolate given Lee successfully made an argument
Can someone post a link, or even a title, of the piece of music at 0:27 ? I assume it's a Horne Section composition but I could be wrong. The show uses it all the time but I haven't found it yet, and it's one of my favorite pieces of background music for TV ever. Even an alternate version would be great.
Probably just blank and was a red herring. If any one of the contestants had seen it, become distracted by it and focused on getting it rather than measuring and spend their time reeling the string in thinking maybe the measurement is attached then the comedic payoff of their disappointment and their time all but having run out without them having done any counting would've been a good pay off. If it actually had the measurement we probably would've been shown at the end of Tim's attempt to demonstrate how within reach the answer was for all of them. I imagine production most throw a lot of extra red herrings and actual useful hints/clues/tools/answers into the tasks to ensure that contestants either get fooled by some of them or find some actually useful clues/tools on occasion and they get footage of it. This is the footage we then see in the edit. But a lot of red herrings and actual clues in many tasks probably just never get realised
I thought this as well BUT judging by the fact that Tim was not off by many "lobsters" I believe that lobster was roughly 15cm in length (looking at the footage that looks right) and the fact that he said 30cm then there was no need to double the amount he counted. He either knew this or really thought it was 30cm but it turned out to work in his favour.. I'm guessing the latter xD
If we are too judge the "lobster" by the same standards of other imperial measurements, a lobster can be whatever the hell Tim wants it to be (see: Paces vs. Steps). As to the other comments about not Alex not actually measuring the plastic lobster: Same As above (see: Barley Corn vs. Inch)
@@Im_Smam No, I think he doubled the lobster count based on how far he was on it. He was in the lower half of the 100s nearing the end of the task, probably got 154 and did x2 on it.
Yeah I thought for sure one of them would've started rewinding the string to few centimetres or something similar aswell Actually ignore me I've just realized they probably meant the whole ball not just the unwound bit😂
Before I watch the rest, I'm guessing that the real answer is how long the entire ball is as it's one piece of string. Probably some set amount like 50/75 meters or something.
Stretch your one arm level with your shoulder....from the tips of your fingers to your opposite shoulder in a straight line is usually about 1 meter in an average adult.
Is there a "behind the scenes" segment where they show you what things they had set up to make the task easier? I feel like I saw another ball of string sitting on the table inside the caravan. I'd have spent 30 seconds rummaging through the caravan to see if there was a measuring tape, and might have found that one.
I noticed they showed that piece of paper at end of string a couple of times and I was sure the sneaky bastards were going to have the answer written on back of it
Yeah, my thought exactly, right when I heard the task for the first time. Even if you only know the weight and can estimate the yarn type you can get a pretty decent guess in.
I would have probably hoped that the string was sold in some kind of sensible unit in the first place and 100m would have been a fairly good guess anyway. Still, I'd be barely closer than Tim measuring in Lobsters.
A piece of string is 3 inches long if it's Simpson's Stringettes, and it's super absobant. Handy for tying messages to pigeons' feet or flogging rats to death.
I'd have looked at the ball of string still attached to the rest of the string, asked Alex if it counted, when told "that's up to you" asked if someone could find the packaging the string came in, and given the total length of the ball of string. probably about 1000 ft, and got ~2 points.
Note that your degree of error with a non-standard unit, in this case "the lobster" is linear. Further your inaccurate use of the instrument "the lobster" depending on how it's used can actually average out. You can use this to your advantage. In that case it introduces exactly one "lobster" of error. That means in total your worse case is an error of 200%. That's pretty good for making up a unit and very sloppily using an instrument. It's actually really a good idea to use these principals in your every day life. Degrees of accuracy are hard to understand. But even with no understanding of what you're doing and making it up as you go as long as you're methodical you'll get a degree of accuracy that's good enough to evaluate yourself. Yeah this is a silly game show meant to appeal to prime time TV but it's actually showing a really really good piece of advice you aren't really taught in school.
commenting because i don't see anyone with my solution: i would have googled on my phone for different packages of string and chosen the one that most closely resembled the remaining spool
Someone pointed this out on the full episode, but the 5 contestants measure in feet, meters, inches, miles, and lobsters.
technically the lobsters was a conversion from centimeters, but still funny.
@@tdarkhorse4 well everything can be a conversion from centimeters
METRES.
@@himagain803 no no, he just mentioned the lobster twice (or spells in American, or used his native way of spelling the word that is pronounced "meter")
@@himagain803 meter is correct
The best part is he counted wrong. Each wind around the lobster should have been counted as 2, due to it running the length of the lobster twice.
+
He could have multiplied the final number by 2, or divided the lobster estimation by 2.
Luckily, he accidentally compensated for that by overestimating the length of the lobster by about 100%
My guess is he actually doubled the counting. He was at 110 while only having a few metres left and the final guess was 308 lobsters which could have been 154 windings.
Truly one of life's unsolvable mysteries
Liza “It’s the sort of thing you dream about when you’re 7”. Cue Tim taking 15 minutes longer than anyone else to get to the caravan because he channelled his inner 7 year old self 🤣
To be fair, I think he's doing that most of the time.
Tim spending the whole series wearing a belt around his middle when he really needed one for his shorts is a mood
reading this is such a mood
@@Romeren replying to you is such a mood.........
What's a mood?
@@robertsandiford6223 A mood is a feeling.
@@squeakyelbows A person wearing a belt isn't a feeling though.
Alex: "Lisa was 21000 lobsters out."
Lisa: "Understandable, have a nice day."
It's a long standing taskmaster tradition for Alex to measure things in non-typical measurements, I'd have just taken the 308 lobsters as a final answer :D
yeah it's messed up that he insisted on converting it. Why are "feet" ok, but not "lobsters"?
Tim should have replied with "It's not part of the task to measure the lobster and no unit of measurement was defined in that task."
Although Alex asks for the length of the lobster, in the studio results they have allowed for Tim to use "lobster" as a unit of measurement. In the caravan, Tim gives the length of the lobster as "about 30cm" but, in the studio, Alex provides Tim's guess using a different conversion (1 lobster = 1 foot) so we can assume Tim's conversion was not taken into account (the difference between a foot and 30cm is marginal but would make a big difference over a length so long).
@@mikegreen3485 even taking the fairly small difference into account, he was still closest by far... which is impressive luck given that one wrap round the lobster was waaay off a foot or 30cm & he only managed to get lucky based on the number of times he missed the lobster & wrapped his hand instead :p
a true triumph of luck over skill.
@@sjs9698 well I mean no one else came close to measuring it accurately anyway
I had high hopes for Alice, it initially seemed like she was going to apply some science and make a sensible attempt. I guess she didn't notice the lobster.
Easy to overlook a lobster in the heat of the moment.
"Lobster" is just as logical as other imperial units of measure like "stone" to be honest
Or any unit of measurement, really. They just have to adhere to a consistent internal logic that people understand and can measure with.
It's like the cup system in the US (for cooking, not measuring bra size). Remarkably simple but effective way of measuring out volumes, all you need is a set of measuring cups and you're away.
Well the metre was meant to be a fraction of the distance of the pole to the equator yet the French managed to get that wrong yet we've stuck with it. Old measurements were based off people. So they're all arbitrary really, yet the metre is technically wrong, you can't say the same about the stone however :P
@@peterclarke7240 No it's not, not at all!
It's very easy to convert metric system units into other units. 1 mm = 1000 meter, 1meter = 1 kilometer. 1 squared meter = 1000 liter in volume. 1 ml = 1 liter. Water freezes at 0 degrees and it boils at 100 degrees.
Now tell me, how many feet is a square mile? And what are the dimensions of a gallon?
@@taserrr
???
"How many feet is a square mile"
Length =/= Area
"Dimensions of a gallon"
3xLength =/= Volume
Also, you've _completely_ missed the point they were making
"They just have to adhere to a consistent internal logic that people understand and can measure with"
People who grew up with and have used the imperial measurement system for most of their lives can easily use it
Just because you yourself cannot doesn't mean it's impossible that it makes sense to others - especially those from hundreds of years ago who used imperial measurements every day their entire lives
@@Stevo_1998 No they can't I just explained why. Most people that grew up with imperial system don't know how many feet go into a mile or what the dimensions of a gallon are.
I think Alice should have gotten more credit for her method in this task, I mean "this piece of string" is vague enough that that should have counted
It's the same as "this flame". When she read it out, she identified the specific piece of string in question. The answer she gave was to a part of the specific string in question. Kind of clever, but I don't think it should count
Did the instructions specify not cutting the string? Because if not, "measure the string" could start to have an ambiguous meaning after it's cut and it's no longer one string but two. For instance, imagine if Alice had been asking Alex to point at the string that needs measured, and continue pointing even after she cuts it.
All depends of the Taskmaster’s decision. Greg said no, so she only got 2 points.
Over a year later and the lobsters bit always makes me laugh
isnt the lobster method not SUPER wrong, but due to a mistake super right?
He counted 308. 308 times wrapping around the lobster is actually 616 times the length of a lobster because you have 1 times the lenght going head to tail, and then 1 times the length going back tail to head. Estimating the lobster at 1 foot, he should have guessed 616 feet had he used this method correctly.
However either his counting or his estimate of the lobster length is so far off, that he actually got really close to the correct answer by accident :D
He nearly doubled the length of the lobster in his estimate
based on the numbers he was saying, it looked to me like he probably counted to 154 and said 308 at the end to get his final answer, since he was barely over 100 by the time he did the whole ball.
to be fair, a lot of the wraps weren't the full length of the lobsters. This meant less string countet as more string.
Liza's attitude to tasks is 99% how I approach most stuff in life.
No wonder UK is going to shits, people just dont give a flying F.
I love how Alice asks for scissors so nicely
1:20 Tim saying ‘pardon’ after the car horn made me laugh way more than I should have done.
The quickest and most accurate answer is to define the unit of measurement relative to the string. Tell em its 4 Glorfars and then tell em a Glorfar is a unit of measurement defined as that piece of string divided by 4.
Or just say it's one string long
Since Alex asked how long a lobster was, he would most likely also ask you how long a Glorfar is.
@@devbom878 It is the length of the string divided by 4
I remember this saying rather well. Also the day I got the answer. A little old lady I was talking to responded with “twice as long as it is from the middle to the end”. Wise old lady 👍
Tim deserved a bonus point for inventing the lobster system!
5:42 the way Alice says “thank you”, I totally fell in love at that point
For some reason, I always pictured the room with the big Taskmaster painting in to be on the first floor, not ground level.
Me too!
First floor IS ground level, isn't it?? Wouldn't upstairs be a 2nd floor??
@@DSW_314 UK numbering is Ground, First, Second etc.
This is the day I realised that my feet are a lobster long...
Just as amusing as the first time I saw it. Lobster on the Vine.
Love how Liza has a multitool about her person. She seems like someone who'd bosh up a set of shelves during her lunchbreak without a moment's hesitation.
My kind of lady. Plus she's not shy about knowing the best place for a profiterole, and the fastest way of getting it there. 😂
Isn't this filmed in the UK? And aren't locking knives illegal in the UK?
@@Echinacae the UK requires you to have a "valid reason" to carry anything larger than a few inches or anything locking or fixed. in this case using it to cut string seems like a valid reason to have a knife, and imo "so I don't accidentally close it on my fingers" is already inherently a valid reason for knives to lock
“Lobsters” seems to be as logical a unit of measurement as any, to be honest.
Definitely better than feet.
_Laughs in metric_
During Lisa's attempt you can see her name on the front of the tag 4:41, and as she pulls it through the room with red carpet the tag is upside-down and is BLANK on the back 4:43.
Glad Tim won this. Not only did he get it right but he was the only entertaining one in this task
Tim vine is just brilliant
I rekon the little bit of paper on the end had the full length written down. Remember, dont start the tasks too quick without looking around
I think so too, I wish they'd shown us what was on it. Either that or there was nothing on it but had any of the contestants noticed it they might have assumed there was and forgotten about measuring and instead tried to pull the string as quickly as possible only to discover they had no answer for all their efforts upon getting it creating a comedic moment of disappointment had it happened. However since none of them got to the tag this moment was never created and so they never showed what was on it beyond showing Lisa's name on one side of it during her attempt. This might be more likely than it actually having the length, if it actually had the length I think they would've shown it at the end of Tim's attempt due to how close he was
Changing from 200 meters to 500 feet is hilarious
Would be except he changed from 210 *feet* to 500 feet.
oh you're right, I have no idea how I misheard that
Of course Tim would win the task and be stupidly close in such a Tim way 😂 Pretty amazing, I reckon if he’d managed to count that last bit of string at the 10 sec mark he would’ve got it almost spot on. Alice arguably could’ve won it if she’d reasoned well enough “how long is a piece of string? As long as you want it to be” or something similar. Depends on the wording of the task constraints.
As bad as Aasm's guess was he was still second 😂😂
it wasn't really a bad guess, it couldn't have been more than 1000. just kinda feel it out how much you walked.
Wouldn't that be a kick if the length was written on the back of that piece of paper at the beginning.
Or on that piece of paper with the pointing finger hanging on the caravan door
Or on the tag at the end of it.
I think it was likely a red herring, meant to distract the contestants from measuring if seen only to cause disappointment in anyone who did spend all their time reeling the string in only to discover it has no answer on upon getting it and they'd used all their time and done no counting. I think if it had the answer on we would've been shown at the end of Tim's attempt when he was so close to getting it but seemingly did not notice it. I imagine production probably put a lot of extra red herrings and/or legitimately helpful hidden "tools" into many of the tasks for enough of them to actually get noticed in some of the tasks and for them to get footage of them. There's probably a lot of red herrings/actually useful hints/clues/tools that just never get realised just to ensure that a few do and they get footage of those ones that do. It seems to have been implied before that there are tasks that the footage of never gets used and I imagine they do similarly there with tasks, adding more tasks than they'll use when editing to make sure they end up with enough tasks where the footage is able to be edited into a good outcome
The greatest twist in television history.
Was the correct answer on the tag at the end of the string?
Came here to ask the same. Nobody saw it, and normally when that happens they at least address it at the end ("Look under the table"), but they just didn't.
I think it probably wasn't on it. It was probably a red herring for any contestant who did notice it might've become distracted by it and tried to get all the string into the caravan instead of measuring only to be disappointed. Except since none of them noticed it and/or became misled by it it never amounted to anything. If it had had the answer on the backside (we see the front has Lisa's name on in her attempt) I think it would've been shown at the end of Tim's attempt due to how close he was. I imagine there's a lot of red herrings and/or actual additional clues for many of the tasks that never amount to anything as they must surely have to place a lot of them for contestants to not always just be looking for the "easy" way out in every task but also so that sometimes they do fall for red herrings and they get footage of it
@@georgedaniel1189 no I think it was absolutely there and that's why it teased it to us like 8 times. we're meant to know "okay they all missed it", it doesn't need to say anything more
The taskmaster card at the end of the string had the precise measurment on it...
I assumed as much, but it's never made clear in the show. I'm guessing you know this as fact? I'd just love to know for sure :)
I wonder how these tasks are being set up while the contestants are presumably already on the premises. Was there a lab-only task before and the crew arranged the string while that was being filmed?
i dont think that they are... the filming of TM takes months
@@yaoitiddieexpert1486 It takes a while yes, but contestants will do several tasks in a single day. So at some point, other tasks are being set up while the contestant is on the premises. They don't just turn up for one task at a time.
If it isn't a lab task, they're probably asked (while being watched) to stay in a certain room or the caravan, so they can't see what's going on. On a number of occasions we've seen them with cups of coffee/tea, so that's one way of keeping them in the kitchen.
There will be a canteen for food and a green room for waiting about. Thew are probably a couple of dozen crew around that need feeding etc. So plenty of places to wait.
There's an unshown room in the house which the contestants use as a green room that they have to stay in between tasks.
Outrageous that Alice didn't get at least second. She measured the piece of string she chose quite accurately.
@@kevinl3875the question was vague enough to give possiblities to argue. "This piece of string". It doesn't say exactly which piece. It doesn't say 'the whole string before you' or something.
Taskmaster rewards you for defending how you did the task. She didn't even try. She could've done a lot better in the series hlif she backed herself
The piece of string is exactly double the length from the middle to the end😅, technically correct and impossible to prove wrong😊
Good to see a tie in with this week's podcast 👍
Rhod Gilbert gets away with the ridiculous satsuma in A sock scenario and Alice can’t say how long “the piece” of string is, when it doesn’t say how long is the ball of string.
"This" piece of string
It's all about how you argue it.
If she had argued more heavily what "This piece" of string meant she could have taken it.
You have to commit
@@gyroscope915 Yeah exactly this, it also explains why Lee Mack got away with breaking the plates after completing the task but Joe Lycett still got penalised for eating chocolate given Lee successfully made an argument
Can someone post a link, or even a title, of the piece of music at 0:27 ? I assume it's a Horne Section composition but I could be wrong. The show uses it all the time but I haven't found it yet, and it's one of my favorite pieces of background music for TV ever.
Even an alternate version would be great.
:30 seconds in you can see the answer on the card as Tim stands infront of the mailbox.
And we all know at the label on the 3nd of the string the exact length was written..
finally the odd TM measuring units come into actual play
I wonder if the measurement was on that little tag on the end of the string
Probably just blank and was a red herring. If any one of the contestants had seen it, become distracted by it and focused on getting it rather than measuring and spend their time reeling the string in thinking maybe the measurement is attached then the comedic payoff of their disappointment and their time all but having run out without them having done any counting would've been a good pay off. If it actually had the measurement we probably would've been shown at the end of Tim's attempt to demonstrate how within reach the answer was for all of them. I imagine production most throw a lot of extra red herrings and actual useful hints/clues/tools/answers into the tasks to ensure that contestants either get fooled by some of them or find some actually useful clues/tools on occasion and they get footage of it. This is the footage we then see in the edit. But a lot of red herrings and actual clues in many tasks probably just never get realised
I’ve watched every taskmaster video on this channel. This was posted already on August 31. I was excited for a new one :(
"How long do you think the lobster is?"
That wasn't the task Alex!
And you didn't specify the unit of measurement.
They did take his lobster measurement seriously though, so even if Tim had miscalculated the lobster's length, he still would have won
The string is about one string long. You didn't specifics the unit!
Technically 1 wrap of the lobster is 2 x the length of the lobster, so Tim’s guess should’ve been double the amount when converted to metric?
I thought this as well BUT judging by the fact that Tim was not off by many "lobsters" I believe that lobster was roughly 15cm in length (looking at the footage that looks right) and the fact that he said 30cm then there was no need to double the amount he counted. He either knew this or really thought it was 30cm but it turned out to work in his favour.. I'm guessing the latter xD
If we are too judge the "lobster" by the same standards of other imperial measurements, a lobster can be whatever the hell Tim wants it to be (see: Paces vs. Steps).
As to the other comments about not Alex not actually measuring the plastic lobster: Same As above (see: Barley Corn vs. Inch)
@@Im_Smam No, I think he doubled the lobster count based on how far he was on it. He was in the lower half of the 100s nearing the end of the task, probably got 154 and did x2 on it.
I was looking for this, thinking nobody caught that
Tim left the caravan!
Surprised nobody cut a length off, weighed and guess "measured" it, then weighed the whole lot, thought Alice was onto that when she got scissors
Yeah I thought for sure one of them would've started rewinding the string to few centimetres or something similar aswell
Actually ignore me I've just realized they probably meant the whole ball not just the unwound bit😂
How would they weigh it?
i cant believe how happy i am the lobster strat won.
Surely, the correct answer is - 'Twice the distance from the middle to one end.'
Before I watch the rest, I'm guessing that the real answer is how long the entire ball is as it's one piece of string. Probably some set amount like 50/75 meters or something.
You could have just googled balls of string and seen what sizes they sell in, then use your eyes to determine which one would be closer.
They probably cut some off in advance
Stretch your one arm level with your shoulder....from the tips of your fingers to your opposite shoulder in a straight line is usually about 1 meter in an average adult.
Know matter how long a piece of string its always double from the middle to the end 👍
Twice the distance from the middle to one end..the exact length of a piece of string
Is there a "behind the scenes" segment where they show you what things they had set up to make the task easier? I feel like I saw another ball of string sitting on the table inside the caravan. I'd have spent 30 seconds rummaging through the caravan to see if there was a measuring tape, and might have found that one.
Anybody curious about the piece of paper at the end of the string ??
I mean, it’s obvious what was on the card attached to the string, still would’ve been nice to see.
If it looks stupid but works, it aint stupid.
Don’t let nasa know about the lobster measurement or they’ll screw that up too!
Tim was an amazing player
I’m the only that thought the answer would be on the back of the label on the end of the string?
I noticed they showed that piece of paper at end of string a couple of times and I was sure the sneaky bastards were going to have the answer written on back of it
I NEED to know what that label said bc that was my thought as well 😅
CM is just abbreviated for Crustacean Meters.
I would have just answered with “very long”. May not be specific, but it’s accurate.
The length of a piece of string is double the length from one end to the centre.
I’d ask Alex where the string was bought and go on their website to check how long it was
any knitter or crocheter would ask for a scale weigh the ball and then measure a portion of that ball and weigh that and multiply.
Yeah, my thought exactly, right when I heard the task for the first time. Even if you only know the weight and can estimate the yarn type you can get a pretty decent guess in.
Keep halving the string until you can estimate the length then X the both. Ask the guy to guide the end for you as you pull it in
The length of a piece of string is exactly twice the distance from the middle to an end
I would have probably hoped that the string was sold in some kind of sensible unit in the first place and 100m would have been a fairly good guess anyway. Still, I'd be barely closer than Tim measuring in Lobsters.
A piece of string is half as long as twice it's length.
What song is being played during the task? It is a catchy tune.
Alex has a band called the "Horne Section", pretty sure they did the intro and most intervals and fillers etc.
Liza Tarbuck is a national treasure.
Took 15 minutes to get to the task but took 5 points off the task
A piece of string is 3 inches long if it's Simpson's Stringettes, and it's super absobant. Handy for tying messages to pigeons' feet or flogging rats to death.
Monty Python? I've heard that before but can't place it.
@@jrd33 It's on the Contractual Obligation album. Also, "I Like Chinese" so much, I married one. Best decision of my life. Married 48 years.
The now string! Simpson's Individual Emperor Stringettes, free from artificial colouring, now used in hospitals.
I'd have looked at the ball of string still attached to the rest of the string, asked Alex if it counted, when told "that's up to you" asked if someone could find the packaging the string came in, and given the total length of the ball of string. probably about 1000 ft, and got ~2 points.
the label you see fluttering as Tim walks in has the length printed on it iirc from the episode itself.
Just silly that Alice didnt get first place. Obviously she did the task correctly, to the letter, and gave the most accurate answer.
I have a similar model if not the same multitool and it has a little ruler on one side lol
I mean. They only sell the string in certain lengths. In England usually 25, 50 and 100 meters. I'm surprised no one just said 100 meters
Note that your degree of error with a non-standard unit, in this case "the lobster" is linear. Further your inaccurate use of the instrument "the lobster" depending on how it's used can actually average out. You can use this to your advantage. In that case it introduces exactly one "lobster" of error. That means in total your worse case is an error of 200%. That's pretty good for making up a unit and very sloppily using an instrument. It's actually really a good idea to use these principals in your every day life. Degrees of accuracy are hard to understand. But even with no understanding of what you're doing and making it up as you go as long as you're methodical you'll get a degree of accuracy that's good enough to evaluate yourself. Yeah this is a silly game show meant to appeal to prime time TV but it's actually showing a really really good piece of advice you aren't really taught in school.
I would say the string is about one string long. I mean, they didn't specify the unit of measurement.
I quite enjoyed Alice's approach.
She just needed to burn the rest of it.
@@johanhalvarsson2148 That would be neat!
Me too! I would have done the same!
A piece of string is exactly half as long as one twice as long as it.!!!
Tim vine Legend 🤘
If it looks stupid, but it works, it's not stupid.
Words to live by.
Can I just say I got this almost to the meter because those balls are sold in 100m 🤷 seemed logical
What was on the peice of paper at the end ? Was it the exact length ?
Yes
Follow this string, 97 metres or 318ft
Knowing what they usually do, almost certainly.
commenting because i don't see anyone with my solution: i would have googled on my phone for different packages of string and chosen the one that most closely resembled the remaining spool
Twice the distance from the centre
Bloody hell thats so funny
I would have used RSU for the unit of measurement.
(Rolled String Units)
All I want to know is if the answer was on that tag on the end of the string
My answer would have been 'Twice half its length' cause the task asked for how long is A piece of string not THIS string
Twice as long as half of it. Done.
Its double the distance of the halved string. You're welcome.
This one's up already. Source: watched all full task clips on this channel in the past week or so...
how long ? twice that of the centre point.
I had the exact same approach to Alice at the start of the video and tbf the instructions says “a” bit of string not all of it?! 😂😂
what was on the tag tied to the end?
The length, I think.
It was each contestant's name. You can see it tied around the end of Liza's when she's pulling it, I believe.
Watching them all fail to get to the label which said the answer :P